The Environmental Group Limited (ASX:EGL)
Australia flag Australia · Delayed Price · Currency is AUD
0.2200
+0.0125 (6.02%)
Apr 28, 2026, 3:02 PM AEST
← View all transcripts

Earnings Call: H1 2025

Feb 20, 2025

Operator

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Environmental Group Limited First Half-year 2025 Financial Results Presentation. All participants are in a listen-only mode. There will be a presentation followed by a question-and-answer session. If you'd like to ask a question today via the webcast, please enter it into the Ask a Question box and click Submit. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Jason Dixon, CEO. Please go ahead.

Jason Dixon
CEO, The Environmental Group Limited

Hi, everyone, and welcome to the call. It's obviously the first half financial results presentation. I'm also joined by Paul Gaskett, Chief Commercial Officer, and Andrew Bush, our Chief Financial Officer for company financial questions. I'll run you through the result, hopefully over the course of about half an hour, and I'm happy to answer questions live on my screen or at the end, whatever you prefer.

Results highlights, I actually thought it was a pretty good result myself. I fully acknowledge we had the AUD 1.2 million one-off within Baltec , but at the same time, purely organic growth in revenue actually grew 16% for the period, up to AUD 54 million. If you took away the AUD 6 million or AUD 7 million that's no longer in the lithium sector that we used to earn before that sector collapsed, we're actually up about 23% in organic top-line growth, which is a great outcome.

Obviously, we're disappointed there, but our number, as I said, due to that AUD 1.2 million Baltec issue. I think what you need to bear in mind, though, is put that AUD 1.2 million back. You're at AUD 5.1 million. At the same time, as I've clearly identified to the market, we're going to invest heavily in Tomlinson's growth in this period as well. We spent nearly AUD 400,000 on training.

That result is obviously far stronger than what it appears on those raw numbers. Now, AUD 8 million cash in hand, which is terrific to help grow the business, and no change to our guidance of about a 10-15% increase in EBITDA for financial year 2025. I'll take you through the individual operating units. Very pleased with two of them.

Once again, not pleased with the error within Baltec, but to achieve top-line growth of nearly 85% in this type of business, an absolutely extraordinary result, up to AUD 19.7 million in revenue. You can see the EBITDA lag up AUD 14.9 million. Add back the AUD 1.2 million to that, you're seeing incredibly strong numbers at very good margins. Again, unfortunately, an error didn't allow that to be achieved.

Full process review has been completed. Appropriate measures of controls have been implemented and completely expected to be a one-off incident. Noise attenuation continues to be a growing industry issue, and our technology in silencers, the work with the only ones that can last the life of a peaking load turbine, continues to be a big advantage for us in the market. A pipeline for sales growth remains particularly strong still at this point in time.

You're all well aware that the demand for peaking power to work in conjunction with renewables is now, I guess, unquestionably needed by the market. I guess five years ago, people would have been saying, "Well, it's all going to be renewables, and it's going to be net zero, and we're going to achieve this by these target dates." That's completely, obviously, not true and will not occur for the next 20, 30, 40 years.

That means any of the turbines that are running in base load, to be economic in that type of renewables environment, they need to be able to run as peaking load turbines. The demand for our technologies and our engineering skills to be able to convert those turbines over is very, very high, hence the level of growth. In that marketplace, our pipeline very strong, as I said, out to 2030.

We expect a continued very good outlook for Baltec, which is great. Second business unit, EGL Energy. Clearly, in my view, for a business that's 130 years old and the oldest boiler company in Australia, to be able to grow the top line by 34% on the prior comparable period is an outstanding result again. Now, you'd be aware of the drivers hopefully behind that.

Obviously, our increased installed capacity means we keep growing our base of recurring revenue by servicing what we've installed by putting in service-level agreements for five years when we sell new boilers, and we've had a good period selling new boilers. As expected, and I hope the market was clear on this, our margin declined 2.1% on the prior, and that was the cost of associated onboarding, the new 10 staff that we talked about.

We hired 10 additional service staff during the period to support the top-line growth. We identified back in, I think it was about May, that there was additional demand above what our current service levels were. We made the conscious decision to invest into that. It takes approximately three months for the training of a new staff member within that boiler service division to become a qualified boiler service technician.

If you do pretty simply 10 people at AUD 150,000 a head for a quarter, that's about AUD 400,000 that's gone into that investment. If we had not chosen to grow that way, the result would clearly be higher with a lower top-line growth, but we made the decision to continue to penetrate that market to grow our service and recurring revenue, which in total across the whole of EGL is now up to 52%.

That strategy has been very, very successful. Secondly to that, we secured a deal back with Fulton Boilers to be their exclusive distribution company in Australia back in May, and we commenced our sales initiative. Very pleased to report that that's exceeded our expectations and grown faster than what we expected it to. At the time we secured, I spoke about achieving $2 million-plus in sales in the first year, hoping to build it up to AUD 6 million-AUD 7 million over the coming two or three years.

We're probably annualising closer to an AUD 4 million mark in Fulton Boilers right now. That strategic initiative did not cost us any capital. We did the deal with Fulton Boilers to do it in Australia. It's worked very well for them because they've increased their sales significantly, and it's worked very, very well for us.

Those two strategic initiatives we employed to grow have come through fantastically for us. Obviously, the bottom line will now catch up to the top line in terms of its growth, but we've certainly increased our market share throughout that segment. The fact that we're the only single 24/7 service provider nationwide means for those tier one clients we're a very, very attractive proposition.

A very simple example of how that product range has worked for us, we're currently talking to one fast-moving consumer goods company, about an 8 MW boiler, as well as four small electric boilers. The reason those FMCGs are interested in those smaller electric boilers is they can tick the green box that they reduce their carbon footprint and move to a type of boiler that's not burning hydrocarbons. That strategy has been terrifically successful for us.

We'll continue to grow that business, and as I said, you'll see the margin catch up over time in that business. EGL Clean Air, as I flagged back in last year's results and at the AGM, always going to be very, very challenging market conditions. Margins decline in the half with several projects going on hold or being postponed. You guys in the market, you'd be aware of what's going on.

I think we're doing work on Pilbara Minerals pilot plant, but I'll have examples that that's going on hold as with many others. If you look in that prior comparable period into 1H 2024, we had about AUD 7 million in revenue in the lithium sector in that period, or maybe AUD 6.5 million in lithium, which has now completely declined, of course.

We strategically purchased Airtight Solutions back in May of 2023, looking at the EGL Clean Air business unit and saying, "Well, it's highly leveraged into the mining sector, and that brings certainly cyclical risk." We purchased a company to move into air pollution and dust, in particular, matter unrelated to the mining sector, but much more around the commercial industrial sector, which has diversified our revenue base and helped to mitigate that single sector risk, which we were facing, albeit you'd have to go through the pain of that cyclical downturn.

It is really good to note now that trading conditions with that dust, in particular, matter sector appear to be a lot stronger. Since we bought it, there is obviously the big downturn in the building sector and the joinery sector, which was hurting its results. We are now seeing that start to turn around, which is great.

A very good example of generally in that business, work on hands around AUD 2 million over the course of the last couple of months, work on hands increased by 50% up to AUD 3 million. We are really starting to see the strength of that coming through. The other ones, new products we have also introduced. We introduced a dust suppression technology to go onto waste sites, largely working above shredders.

We are using the technology associated with compressed air to stop the dust getting out into the broader environment within that waste recycling plant inside the building. That technology, it is US technology that we have gained, we have got in Australia, has gone particularly well. It is now been trialled, I believe, at around three sites. One of those customers has already purchased a unit.

They've indicated they've got interest in purchasing another four or five, and it's been trialed at another two sites that are strongly interested. Us introducing those new technologies, similar to what we did with Fulton, appears to be going to pay dividends very much within that business. I'm expecting we've seen the bottom now in air, and we've faced the pain of that lithium cycle, and we'll start to see some improvement, I would hope.

EGL Waste, very, very pleased with what's going on. We've had exceptional success from our large tender pipeline in the period. We haven't announced these. We're waiting for the investor briefing this morning, but we've won a construction demolition plant up in Queensland, which is terrific. We've received notification of being preferred supplier for materials recovery plant in New Zealand.

We're moving forward to a period now of negotiation and finalizing that contract. We'll see that move forward quite soon. There are a number of others that are out there as well. There are probably another roughly three tenders that are due for notification of preferred supplier or contract award within the next eight weeks. Some of those are quite imminent now. We're aware of the fact that we're last two in a couple of those.

I think after a couple of years of fairly hard work into this sector and hard work in developing that tender pipeline, it looks like it's going to have a very good payback for us in this second half of the financial year. You're aware that it's commission that we get initially on the sale. We get the immediate profitability from those sales coming through. As I said, looking very, very promising.

We've already landed one. We're about to land two and potentially another couple coming straight through. Expect to see very good results from waste services in the second half. We've still got a pipeline after we've taken those couple of wins out of AUD 108 million. Still a very strong pipeline coming through. The other thing I'd note, we talked about landing the Kadant PAAL distribution agreement in Australia.

I think that was about February or March of this year. We're now getting involved heavily in that market. We're now doing servicing of Kadant PAAL balers. We're doing the spares for them. We've got a couple of boilers that we've priced for tender and sales at this point in time. They're a high-value item. They're EUR 600,000-EUR 700,000, so over AUD 1 million that we make very good margins on.

The revenue at USD 600,000, obviously not big yet, but within that, it's just pure service revenue. We're now doing $100,000-$120,000 a month in servicing our customers, building up that recurring revenue base as we continue to grow. I can't emphasize enough that our waste clients contribute material revenue across the whole of the EGL businesses. We don't book it into waste.

If we sell a dust suppression system, it goes into EGL Clean Air. If we're selling autoclaves to deal with medical waste, it's going to EGL Energy. Very promising half and very promising outlook, which is terrific. EGL Water, much of the same. Ironically, it's taken roughly the same time to get the business into these positions. Significant milestone just before Christmas of getting the draft approval from the EPA. We're still waiting final approval to come through.

I'm sure that's shortly, but the EPA, unfortunately, seem to take a long time doing everything. That's got no impact on where we are currently with the business. We also got the patent out of the United States, which ironically came quicker than we expected, which is another significant milestone for us. I guess what's more important is where we are on the commercialization of the PFAS separation technology that we've been working on.

We've continued to progress it very well. Board approval for a detailed business and marketing plan and committing the resources required to develop this technology. By that, I mean that we'll be putting on a direct sales force to continue to penetrate that market. We've identified over the last six months in the work we've been doing that we've got interest from the liquid waste treatment facilities.

We've got interest from landfill owners, and we've got significant interest from water authorities. When I'm talking about water authorities, there's something in the order of five waste streams, different waste streams within a water authority that all need treatment for PFAS. We've executed as recently as yesterday further NDAs with water authorities to be able to treat all five of those waste streams and let them know the results of how they've gone.

Level of interest in the product is high at the moment. We'd have four or five pricing tenders sitting in front of clients that we're highly engaged with. We're on client sites twice last week looking at the final design of what they've required for their PFAS plants to retrieve the treatment. We've taken sample loads from them. We've run them through our technologies. We've provided them the results.

As I said, we're now in that final design phase. I think you can expect to see a bit more excitement and some good results coming through this segment at the moment. As I said, it's taken a while. It's been very hard work, but we've really got it up and going now. The bottom line's an important one. The PFAS remediation trials of soils and biosolids, it's very, very important to us that we continue to move through that.

Part of the board approval was also investing in materials handling plant on top of our core technology to be able to do biosolids. The reason that's so important is a lot of the PFAS, its final resting point is at the sewage treatment farms.

That is either because it is being discharged via trade waste into the industrial sewers or it is being picked up through groundwaters, going into the network and other sources of getting in there. It is pretty basic. It is about, what, 28 million people need to use the bathroom in Australia. All of that waste, the biosolid waste, is accumulating at these facilities.

Traditionally, it has been dehydrated and sold as a biosolid, as a product to go to farmland, as I think it is called a soil enhancement product. It is allowed under a part of the EPA Act that says if something can be beneficially reused, then it is done.

All of that immense amount of biosolids has been put onto farming land. Unfortunately, now there is so much PFAS that is coming through our sewer networks and ending up at those sewage treatment plants that those biosolids are now contaminated.

You can imagine the sheer volume of those contaminated biosolids that now cannot be put onto farmland. That is a new and very large problematic waste stream that needs sorting. We have worked on testing those results. We have very, very good results coming through on what we have been able to achieve with biosolids.

I think part of what we are signing up with these water treatment companies will be indeed being able to work through biosolids and do some large trials on biosolids. Very, very promising times now in EGL Water. It has been bloody hard work, but I think we are at the point now where we are going to start to move forward with what we have worked so hard on commercially. In terms of outlook, it is much that I have already spoken about. Baltec, of course, have to have very strong performance.

As I said, revenue up 85% and a very good sales pipeline supporting it going forward. Obviously, that increased support to renewable energy that we need to do. Peaking load turbines. When the sun doesn't shine, when the wind's not blowing, you need to turn on those gas-fired generators. You've probably seen the ads to that effect on your television. We're aware of turbines now that are being turned on and off up to four to five times a day.

Our world-leading technology and being able to have silencers that will work in conjunction with those peaking load turbines has put us in a great position. As I mentioned in EGL Air, conditions remain difficult, especially in the lithium sector. Our strategy is to introduce dust extraction and help to grow the business, diversify those revenues.

We're really seeing green shoots and improving market within that dust extraction sector. EGL Water won't cover again and waste, but suffice to say, exciting. Half expected with the tenders that have been awarded. Baldwin Distribution obviously exceeded expectations, and the additional staff will continue to grow the revenue within EGL Energy. For us, I guess it's really been that extended product offering, whether it's Fulton, whether it's Kadant PAAL boilers and other opportunities that we're now looking at in the pipeline. We're not spending any capital.

We're introducing very high-value licenses to the company and driving that growth. ERP, you're probably aware we're going to implement over the next 12 months to improve the efficiency and the accuracy within the business. Our guidance remains unchanged that we expect to increase approximately 10-15% on the prior year.

I've had a couple of questions come in that I'll try to respond to now. You're certainly welcome to put in more questions. Thanks for your time today. Baltec, looking beyond the aberration this year, are you comfortable getting back to FY2024 type models?

Yes, we are. Why do I have conviction in that is I know what price we're tendering these jobs at, literally to the percent. I know exactly what our overheads are.

If you're tendering a certain price, you're winning a certain gross margin. You understand your overhead. No issues at all with saying we'll be able to get back to the prior EBITDA. In my mind, this was a one-off event. It was a mistake made, unfortunately, by a member of staff that was made because of very, very unusual circumstances. There's nothing we can do about that.

We're just going to be with it and move on and try and ensure it doesn't happen again. Bear in mind that it's always going to be a slightly lumpy business because different jobs that you're working on are going to go into new financial periods or might get delayed a little bit. It won't always be absolutely smooth sailing. When your question is to my conviction around that, my conviction is very, very high that we'll be able to achieve that.

Energy continues to be the standout here. Walk us through where the more stuff. Look, the answer is probably yes. Ironically, we could probably go beyond the 10 that we increased at this point in time. We're clearly taking market share off our competitors. Clearly, the Fulton has also damaged some of our competitors.

One of our competitors, quite a large competitor, has actually pulled out of servicing within their own home state where they were quite strong. I think we'll continue to grow the amount of people that we have servicing that sector and continue to grow the business that way. It's great margin, great recurring revenue. For those of you who don't know, for every boiler that's over 2 megawatt, it needs to have an inspection performed every five weeks.

We've now got, I think, over 1,000 on our books that are being serviced 11 or 12 times a year, inspected and serviced 11 or 12 times. He said something like 14,000 services we now undertake. Phenomenal recurring revenue. What year-on-year sales growth can this do and margin-wise? I guess it's a bit hard to look forward on that. Margin's always been around that 14-15%.

I've sort of articulated that there was a 2% for the AUD 375,000 we'd spent in training this half. Opportunities in wastewater, I think I've covered fairly well. Haven't heard much from EGL's inlet filtration system to fall apart. That is an absolutely fair and reasonable point. The installation is going on, I believe, at the moment. It's been delayed two or three times.

The big cyclone that went through, whatever it was, one or two weeks ago, has caused it to be pushed back with the flooding in the area. We always knew a February installation brought a risk with that. Hopefully, that product will be installed fairly quickly, and then we'll be able to use it as our flagship going forward.

It hasn't been the, in all honesty, it hasn't been the easiest project to get done to get your first one down out at Chichester in the middle of the Pilbara. Probably was quite a tricky way for us to go ahead on. It is underway now, and hopefully will be completed fairly soon. Any PFAS tenders to convert in second half? The answer is absolutely yes. We've been working very hard on them in close consultation with our clients.

As I mentioned, we're out on their sites just last week talking about the final design with two of those clients. Working, of course, as fast as we can to get that done. I would guess that yes, they'll fall in this half, in my view. Guidance implies a bit second half result. I presume that's the typing is meant to be a big second half result.

How much of the result is covered by work known in hand? Work in hand projects versus still having to secure wins. I guess around 80% would already be known. Maybe close to 85% would already be known in work in hand. We've obviously fallen out pipeline for Baltec, so that's already done. Work in hand for Tomlinson boilers is at extremely high levels. I know energy. Sorry, I know energy's done.

The work in hand, as I mentioned, has gone up by me in air, so that's pretty well comfortable. Secure wins in waste and water. Yeah, that's absolutely true. As I've mentioned, we've already secured two in waste that we've just announced today in this result. One we've done the contract on, the other one we're finalizing. That's two of them done already with another three in the pipeline.

Of those three, we know we'll prefer tenderer. Sorry, we know where the last two are in two of those, and we're expected to know those within the next two to three weeks. Once again, it might be literally in our hands now, but very, very confident on that going forward. We know these customers well. We've worked with them very closely for two years. We've got a pretty good idea on where we are.

Repending waste tenders to EGL expect revenue growth from both in commissions and installings. Yes, no, that's absolutely correct, that question. We do expect revenue growth. The immediate sugar hit is the commission. If we sell a $20 million plant, we get a $400,000 commission, which is 100% profit made straight up, which is great. For us, though, it goes well beyond that.

It goes to the other things that we can sell into that plant. Generally, we'll then do the structural steels for that recycling facility. We'll do the ladders and platforms. We'll do the dust suppression systems, hopefully through the new dry fogging systems that we've got. We'll do their dust extraction systems through EGL Clean Air. If they've got medical waste or pathogenic waste come in, we'll do boilers and autoclaves for them.

We will service. Our balers, I should mention, it's not good of me to mention balers. If you're doing a MRF for a plant with an SRF line, then they'd also be looking to buy a Kadant PAAL baler off us as well. Yes, we'd expect that to grow from the current AUD 120,000 a month run rate. Do not forget, we book a lot of that revenue.

If it's a dust control system, we'll get booked to air division. If it was boilers and autoclaves, it'd get booked into the boiler division. Yes, I think if we sell a plant for around AUD 20 million-AUD 25 million, we'd expect to get AUD 3 million-AUD 3.5 million in additional sales out of that plant. As I said, we're really starting to crank up our servicing in Australia.

Next one, sorry. Do you expect D&A as percentage of sales next year? Still low single digits. Can you also let me know? No, there's no material CapEx planned. We're not a CapEx-heavy business. The CapEx in Baltec is absolutely minimal. CapEx in waste and water, very minimal outside of building plants before they're sold. It's only working capital. Tomlinson does use a little bit of capital, but not particularly much.

If we go through the example of the 10 people we put on, it means that we've leased 10 more utes, and we would have given each one of them $10,000 worth of tools. That's roughly the CapEx. The only CapEx planned is simply the ERP that we're processing we're going through at the moment. That's in the order of AUD 500,000-AUD 600,000. That will be a blend of FY2025 and FY2026 if we go through the market.

No, I wouldn't expect D&A to go up as a percentage of sales. Bearing in mind, of course, now that leases do get booked in part to depreciation amortization, so the amortization on things is about 80% of our lease costs and about 20% goes through to the interest line or something like that. What testing requirements do clients have to confirm PFAS waste streams? We'd expect.

Yeah, no, that's a good question. Pretty easy one. Generally, there's twofold. Before a client will move forward on ordering a plant, they'll give us samples of their PFAS waste streams. We'll take them to the facility. We'll process those streams and make sure that we can achieve the outcomes that are required on those waste streams, which is obviously then when they get interested in talking commercially on a plant, and we've been able to achieve that, I think, with most waste streams that we've looked at.

How do they? It's through the inspect. Before you're allowed to discharge to sewer, liquid waste treatment plant facility, you've got to test what's contained within those liquids, of course, because it's not just PFAS. It'll be hydrocarbons. It'll be the pH levels, total dissolved solids.

You take samples prior to discharge, which would include, of course, PFAS before it's discharged. Yeah, it's absolutely checked before that happens. Next one. Appreciate all the hard work. It's always been a trying year. Thank you. Reaction today says the market is struggling regarding forecast credibility. I think that would be quite a remarkable take on things.

We've upgraded every year for three years in a row our guidance, and we've had one single issue on a one-off. People want to take that view about forecast credibility. That's their decision, not mine, but it would be an incredibly short-term view, in my view. I'm not saying the guidance is conservative. Oh, sorry, let me read it. Conservative sales growth can continue. Sales growth certainly in FY2026 can continue. Clearly, we'll get the full year benefit of the additional staff and energy.

We intend to grow full sales even further again. I indicated originally I thought that would be worth AUD 6 million or AUD 7 million to us, so it is still almost another 50% growth in there. I certainly believe or hope that we are at the bottom of clean air in that cycle. I do not think lithium is coming back in a hurry, but there is no more lithium to take away from us.

Yes, we will continue to achieve growth in FY2026. We have worked extremely hard to grow the top line in this current market. It is 16% when you have had negative 6% taken out through lithium. It is actually quite a remarkable achievement for the company and an absolute credit to the company and what has been achieved. We own our mistaken, and that is life, and we cannot change that.

How many other businesses are growing their top line at that level at our size in these types of industries? I'm not sure you'd find that many. Cash conversion lag in one age given inventory built in contract assets. Yes, you're absolutely right on that. Inventory, because of the Fulton, etc., I think we've increased stock by about AUD 3.5 million during the period.

Andrew's more than welcome to chip in and answer that. Yes, contract assets have gone up significantly. That's works that are already underway that we have not invoiced, so that will swing very significantly the other way.

Andrew Bush
CFO, The Environmental Group Limited

Inventory increased due basically to, like Jason said, Fulton's plus increase in the stock availability in our site. Also, contract assets will generate increased cash flow in the second half. Jason.

Jason Dixon
CEO, The Environmental Group Limited

Thank you, Andrew. Okay, next one.

PFAS is the current municipal water effort focus on water, wastewater, sludge, pre-smoked technology, and economically insured of treating contaminated catchment. The contaminated catchment water is not actually a real issue in Australia, to be honest. It makes the media, you've heard about a dam in New South Wales. It's effectively not a market in Australia, in my view.

We largely drink rainwater in Australia that's collected in dams. Generally, our dams are very, very clean. I'm only aware of three that have got minor levels of PFAS contamination in them. Your reference is very different in the U.S. market. In the U.S. market, depending on where you are, 40-60% of drinking water comes from groundwater. That's why they have such concerns about the drinking water in the U.S. Completely different market for over here.

The big issues over here, wastewater, contaminated wastewater, that's a big issue. Biosludge is a very big issue. Leachate that's coming out of landfills is a massive issue where the products are broken down in the landfill. It's rained, and then it's been collected in that rainfall catchment. Given there's over 1,100 landfills in Australia, that's an enormous area that requires improvement, requires treatment. We're very successful in treating leachate.

We'd almost call that our sort of number one preferred product, if you like, as much as landfill leachate's bloody awful. We get exceptionally good results on that. The market's growing all the time. At the moment, as I said, we're talking to one waste authority about doing effluent, an airport, biosludges, groundwater, and something else with Paul Gaskett might be able to come in and help me out with. Bigger purpose.

Paul Gaskett
Chief Commercial Officer, The Environmental Group Limited

Yes, soils.

Jason Dixon
CEO, The Environmental Group Limited

Soils as well, sorry.

Yeah, it's a very, very wide market in Australia, but drinking water is certainly not a big issue in Australia, in my view. Operator, I don't seem to have any further questions at this point in time.

Operator

Thank you. If there are no further questions at this time, this does conclude our webcast for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Jason Dixon
CEO, The Environmental Group Limited

Cheers. Thank you, everyone, for listening. Appreciate it.

Powered by