Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to the Larsen & Toubro Limited Q1 FY25 earnings conference call. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during this conference, please signal an operator by pressing star and then zero on your touch-tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. P. Ramakrishnan, Head Investor Relations from Larsen & Toubro Limited. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Thank you, Darwin. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. A very warm welcome to all of you into the Q1 FY25 earnings call of Larsen & Toubro. The earnings presentation was uploaded on the stock exchange and then our website at around 6:30 P.M. As per the normal practice, instead of going through the entire presentation, I will take you through the important highlights for the quarter, followed by our financial performance summary for the same quarter in the next 30 minutes or so. And after that, I will be taking the Q&A.
Before I begin the overview, the customary disclaimer, the presentation that we have uploaded on the stock exchange and our website today, including the discussions we may have on the call now, may contain certain forward-looking statements concerning L&T Group's business prospects and profitability, which are subject to several risks and uncertainties, and the actual results could materially differ from those in such forward-looking statements. I would request you to go through the detailed disclaimer, which is available in slide two of our earnings presentation that we have uploaded today. To start with, the Indian economy continues to display a strong growth momentum despite the global headwinds. With the conclusion of the general elections in the country, we expect policy continuity going forward. The Union Budget for FY25 that got announced yesterday has reaffirmed the government's commitment towards enhanced public Capex in the medium term.
The central government budgeted CapEx at ₹11.11 trillion, is around 3.4% of the GDP. Further, to promote state government CapEx spending, an amount of ₹1.5 trillion has been set aside as long-term interest-free loans. With a combination of improved domestic demand conditions, a good availability of bank credit, further backed by government's incentives for manufacturing, and finally, with the election risk behind us, the stage is set in a way for a revival in overall CapEx in the country. The government budget yesterday also mentioned about promoting private investments in infrastructure through a Viability Gap Funding and enabling policies and regulations. In our opinion, the Union Budget strikes a fine balance between prudent resource allocation and achieving fiscal deficit reduction at the same time. Elsewhere, the countries in the Middle East are continuing to focus on investments in oil and gas, infrastructure, industrialization, and energy transition.
Before I get into the details, let me share some important highlights for the quarter. Two coveted global credit rating agencies, Standard and Poor and Fitch, have assigned triple B plus rating to Larsen & Toubro. This rating, with a stable outlook by both the two rating agencies, is two notches above the country's sovereign ratings and essentially underscores the company's exceptional credit quality and robust financial health. Secondly, MSCI ESG Research has also upgraded L&T's rating from double B to triple B on account of company's improvement in various parameters, including ESG. Thirdly, L&T Semiconductor Technologies Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary, has entered into a share purchase agreement this month for acquisition of 100% stake in SiliConch Systems, a Bangalore-based company.
This subsidiary has also signed a master collaboration agreement with Aditya Infotech Limited to develop and supply state-of-the-art systems on chip, that is, SoC and other system solutions for CCTV cameras. Coming to the financial services business, that is, L&T Finance, we are happy to report that the company has achieved, that is, L&T Finance Limited has achieved a 95% utilization as of June 24 of its loan book. The retail book and the retail disbursements for Q1 FY25 have registered a growth of 31% and 33%, respectively. The company also reported an entity-level PAT at INR 686 crore for Q1 FY25 that has registered a 29% growth over the corresponding quarter of the previous year. I will now cover the various financial performance parameters for Q1 FY25. This quarter was a quarter of robust performance across the various financial parameters.
Our group order inflows, revenues, and PAT for Q1 FY25 are up by 8%, 15%, and 12%, respectively. Our working capital to revenue, NWC to revenue, at 13.9% in June 2024, registers a sequential increase of 190 basis points, whereas on a Y-on-Y basis, it has improved by 310 basis points. Moving on to the individual performance metrics, our group order inflows for Q1 FY25 at ₹709 billion registered a Y-on-Y growth of 8%. Within that, our products and manufacturing businesses secured aggregate order inflows of ₹544 billion for Q1, reporting a growth of 8% over the corresponding period of the previous year. Our Q1 order inflows in the products and manufacturing portfolio are mainly from infrastructure, hydrocarbon, and the precision engineering businesses.
During the current quarter, our share of international orders in the products and manufacturing portfolio is at 40% as compared to 35% in Q1 of the previous year. During the quarter, orders were received across multiple segments, subsegments like offshore vertical of hydrocarbons, renewables, transmission and distribution, roads, nuclear power, hydrogen and tunnels, ferrous metals, health, and the precision engineering business. Moving on to the prospects pipeline, we have a total prospects pipeline of ₹9.07 trillion for the remaining nine months of this financial year as compared to ₹10.07 trillion at the same time in the last year. This represents a drop of around 10% on a Y-on-Y basis. This decrease is primarily due to a fall in the hydrocarbon prospects pipeline. The broad breakup of the overall prospects pipeline for the remaining nine months of FY25 would be as follows.
Infrastructure is at INR 6.02 trillion vis-à-vis INR 5.86 trillion last year. Hydrocarbon is INR 2.17 trillion vis-à-vis INR 3.48 trillion as of June 2023. Energy power is at INR 0.45 trillion in and around the same as the last year. The Heavy Engineering and the precision engineering and systems businesses in aggregate have ordered prospects pipeline of INR 0.31 trillion vis-à-vis INR 0.25 trillion last year. The green energy business has started off an order prospects pipeline of INR 0.10 trillion vis-à-vis INR 0.04 trillion last year. Moving on to the order book, our order book as of June 2024 is at INR 4.91 trillion, up 19% vis-à-vis June 2023 of last year. The products and manufacturing business, since it is largely India-centric, 62% of this order book is domestic and 38% international.
Of the international order book of ₹1.86 trillion, around 92% is from Middle East, 1% from Africa, and the remaining 7% from various countries, including Southeast Asia. Like I said earlier, the various countries in the Middle East are continuing to focus on investments in oil and gas, infrastructure, industrialization, and energy transition. The breakdown of the domestic order book at ₹3.05 trillion, which I said earlier at 62% of the overall order book, is as follows. Central government orders share is 14%. State government contracts account to 28% of the domestic order book. Public sector corporations or state-owned enterprises have a share of 37%, and private sector at 21%. Approximately around 18% of this total order book of ₹4.91 trillion is funded by multilateral and bilateral funding agencies. Against this total order book of ₹4.91 trillion, 90% of that is coming from infrastructure and energy.
The details of this are already there in the presentation slides. During Q1 FY25, we have deleted orders of INR 6 billion from the order book. And as of June 24, the slow-moving orders is well less than 1% of the order book. Coming to revenues, our group revenues for Q1 FY25 at INR 551 billion registered a Y-on-Y growth of 15%. International revenues constituted 48% of the revenues during the quarter. The strong execution momentum in infrastructure, hydrocarbon, and the precision engineering and systems within the products and manufacturing portfolio enabled the overall group revenues for the quarter. The revenue for the products and manufacturing business for Q1 FY25 is at INR 386 billion, up 18% over the corresponding quarter of the previous year. Moving on to EBITDA margin, the group-level EBITDA margin without other income for Q1 FY25 is 10.2%, at the same levels as Q1 of the previous year.
The breakup of the EBITDA margin business-wise, including other income, is given in the annexes to the earnings presentation. You may note that the EBITDA margin in the products and manufacturing business for Q1 FY25 is at 7.6% as compared to 7.4% in Q1 FY24. I will cover the details a little later when I talk about the performance of each of the segments. Our consolidated PAT for Q1 FY25 at INR 28 billion is up 12% over Q1 of last year. This PAT growth is reflective of improved activity levels, partly offset by lower other income. The drop in other income is a function of lower treasury investments in the current quarter as compared to the corresponding quarter of the previous year. And here again, the drop in treasury investments is largely due to the share buyback concluded by the company in the previous financial year.
The group performance, the P&L construct, along with the reasons for major variances under the respective functions, is provided in the presentation. You may go through the same for further details. Coming to working capital, our NWC to sales ratio has moved from 12% in March 2024 to 13.9% in June 2024, mainly due to the build-up in the gross working capital during the quarter. However, on a Y-on-Y basis, the net NWC sales ratio has improved from 17% in June 2023 to 13.9% in June 2024. The group-level collections that exclude L&T Finance for Q1 FY25 are ₹459 billion as compared to ₹439 billion in Q1 FY24, this itself registering an increase of 4% on a Y-on-Y basis. You may go through the cash flow statement as part of the annexes to the earnings presentation.
Our cash flow from operations for Q1 FY25 is at INR 5 billion vis-à-vis INR 9.9 billion in Q1 FY24. Finally, the trailing 12-month ROE for Q1 FY25 is 14.7% vis-à-vis 12.8% in Q1 FY24, an improvement of 190 basis points. The improved profitability with every passing quarter, along with the return of capital to shareholders in the form of the buyback, is contributing to this improvement. Very briefly, I will now comment on the performance of each business segment before we give our final comments. First, infrastructure. Coming to order inflows, this segment secured orders for INR 401 billion for Q1 FY25, largely flat on a Y-on-Y basis. During the current quarter, the orders were largely received in renewables, transmission and distribution, roads, nuclear power, hydrogen and tunnel, ferrous metals, health, and the precision engineering sectors.
Our order prospects pipeline in infrastructure segment for the remaining nine months is INR 6.03 trillion vis-à-vis INR 5.86 trillion during the same time last year. This represents an increase of 3%. The infra prospects pipeline of INR 6.03 trillion comprises domestic prospects of INR 4.27 trillion and international prospects of INR 1.76 trillion. The subsegment breakup of the total order prospects in infra is as follows. Water and effluent treatment share is 20%. Power transmission and distribution, including renewables, is at 22%. Transportation infra is 23%. Buildings and factories are 12%. Heavy civil infrastructure is 18%. The share of minerals and metals, the residual, is 5%. The order book of this segment is at INR 3.25 trillion as of June 24. The book build for infra is around three years.
The Q1 revenues are ₹269 billion, registered a strong growth of 22% over the comparable quarter of the previous year, largely aided by the strong execution progress across international jobs. Our EBITDA margin in this segment for Q1 FY25 is at 5.8% vis-à-vis 5.1% in the corresponding quarter of the previous year. The margin improvement is primarily explained by execution cost savings. Moving on to the Energy segment that comprises hydrocarbon and power. Hydrocarbon received multiple domestic offshore orders that enabled to increase its order book. The segment has a strong order prospect pipeline of ₹2.62 trillion for the remaining nine months of the current financial year. The breakup of this ₹2.62 hydrocarbon comprises ₹2.17 trillion and energy power prospects of ₹0.45 trillion. The order book for this Energy segment is at ₹1.18 trillion as of June 24, with hydrocarbon order book at ₹1.13 trillion and power at ₹46 billion.
The Q1 FY25 revenues for this segment are INR 85 billion, registering a healthy growth of 27%, mainly driven by execution ramp-up of international projects in the hydrocarbon subsegment. Lower revenues are power, which is largely reflective of a lower order book. The Energy segment margin in Q1 FY25 is at 8.7% vis-à-vis 9.1% in Q1 FY24. The hydrocarbon margin in Q1 of current year is reflective of jobs in the early stages of execution, which is largely in line with our original plan for the year. The energy power margin improves on account of a favorable claim settlement accrued during the quarter. We will now move on to the high-tech manufacturing segment that comprises the Heavy Engineering and the precision engineering and systems businesses.
The receipt of a shipbuilding order contributed to order inflow growth in the precision engineering and systems business, whereas Heavy Engineering business order inflow is largely in line with that of the previous year. The order book of this segment is at INR 338 billion as of June 24. Our order prospects pipeline for the remaining nine months in this segment is around INR 320 billion. Strong execution momentum drove revenues in the precision engineering systems business, whereas Heavy Engineering revenue was impacted due to a lower opening order book consequent upon order deferrals and jobs in the early stages. Coming to margin, execution cost savings helps the margin improvement in the precision engineering systems business, whereas Heavy Engineering margin benefits from a favorable job mix.
Since we are on this heavy high-tech manufacturing segment, I would once again like to reiterate that the precision engineering systems business does not manufacture any explosives nor ammunition of any kind, including cluster ammunitions or anti-personnel landmines or nuclear weapons or components for such ammunitions. The business also does not customize any delivery systems for such ammunitions. Moving on to the next segment, that is the IT technology and the technology services that comprises the two listed entities, LTIMindtree and LTTS. The revenues for this segment are ₹115 billion in Q1 FY25, registers a modest growth of 6%. This is largely in line with the subdued global macro conditions impacting discretionary IT spends. Despite the ongoing macroeconomic concerns, the deal pipeline for this segment is healthy with good visibility across all the subsegments. The segment margin variation vis-à-vis the previous year is explained by a lower operating leverage.
As both the companies in this segment are listed entities, the detailed fact sheets of the performance are already available in the public domain. We move on to the financial services segment, represented by L&T Finance, one of our other third-listed subsidiaries. Here again, the detailed results of the company are available in the public domain. But very briefly, to sum up, the Q1 revolved around strong retail disbursements, improved profitability, and better asset quality. Further, the balance sheet is strong on the back of adequate provision coverage ratios. L&T Finance Limited today is well ahead of meeting its Lakshya 2026 targets. The retail book growth, asset quality, and the return on assets are highly satisfactory. The business is building itself on the five pillars of growth, that is, enhancing customer acquisition, sharpened credit underwriting, implementing futuristic digital architecture, improved brand visibility, and capability building.
And finally, sufficient capital in the balance sheet is available to pursue the growth in the medium term. Moving on to the development project segment, this segment includes the power development business comprising of Nabha Power and Hyderabad Metro. You may be aware that the company on April 10, 2024, concluded the sale of its stake in the erstwhile L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited, which was a holding company that was engaged in the toll road and the transmission line business. Coming back to the current quarter, the majority of revenues in the development project segment contributed by Nabha Power. The improved ridership in Hyderabad Metro and a higher PLF in Nabha Power contributed to the segment revenue growth, whereas lower interest rate expense in Nabha Power aided the margin improvement at a segment level.
Some ridership statistics for the Hyderabad Metro asset: the average Metro ridership has marginally declined from 4.42 lakh passengers a day in Q4 FY24 to 4.32 lakh passengers per day in Q1 FY25. On a Y-on-Y basis, the ridership improved. The ridership in Q1 FY24 was 4.22 lakh passengers per day. The Metro, at a packed level, we have consolidated a loss of INR 2.14 billion in Q1 FY25 vis-à-vis a loss of INR 3.35 billion in Q1 FY24. Moving on to the other segment, this segment comprises realty business, industrial valves, construction equipment, mining machinery, rubber processing machinery, and a small residual portion of the smart world and communication business. The Q1 FY25 revenue degrew by 37% over the corresponding quarter of the previous year. This has largely contributed to a lower handover of residential units in the realty business.
The sale of commercial space in the realty business and increased sales volumes in the realty business enabled the segment margin improvement. Coming to the last part of my presentation, the outlook: India's domestic activity has remained resilient, with manufacturing activity continuing to gain ground on the back of strengthening domestic demand. The service sector maintained its buoyancy, as evident from the available high-frequency indicators. Private consumption is the mainstay of aggregate demand, recovering with steady discretionary spending happening in the urban areas. The revival in rural demand is getting a fillip from improving farm sector activity. With an expected normal southwest monsoon, the kharif production is likely to get a boost, and the reservoir level is likely to be replenished satisfactorily. With the union elections behind and the likely political stability, the government's continued thrust on CapEx and business optimism bode well for investment activity.
However, the pace of infrastructure progress could slow down due to skilled labor shortage in certain sectors. The Indian economy is at an inflection point in its path towards greater transformational changes that will bring about more stability and growth. The Union Budget presented yesterday a detailed roadmap for the pursuit of Viksit Bharat by 2047. The Budget has sustained efforts on the nine different priorities in order to create ample opportunities for all. Number one: productivity and resilience in agriculture. Two: employment skilling. Three: inclusive human resource development and social justice. Four: manufacturing services. Five: urban development. Six: energy security. Seven: infrastructure. Eight: innovation and R&D. And lastly, nine: next-generation reforms. It is good to note about the government's emphasis on the all-round development of the eastern part of the country through the Purvodaya scheme.
A plan will hopefully get formulated for the development of states like Jharkhand, Bihar, West Bengal, Odisha, and Andhra Pradesh. Secondly, the government is also likely to facilitate the development of investment-ready plug-and-play industrial parks with complete infrastructure in near 100 cities. Thirdly, promoting water supply and sanitation projects in partnership with the various state governments and multilateral development banks is the need of the hour. Finally, a policy for promoting pumped storage is also in the works, and since nuclear energy is expected to form a significant part of the energy mix going forward, there is a plan to develop small modular nuclear reactors as well. Moving on to the other part of the world, the global economy is expected to witness a rebound, though the run-up to the U.S. presidential elections in November can exhibit economic volatility.
With the change of government in the U.K. and a hung parliament in France, the concern about European economic recovery remains. China's economic recovery remains a little off-sided with rising trade tensions threatening to overshadow growth in the exports. The central banks in the West are closely tracking inflation data and may announce a couple of rate cuts later in the current calendar year. Also, regional conflicts remain contained as of now without having major adverse implications for the global economy. The countries in the Middle East, like I said, are continuing to focus on investment in oil and gas, infrastructure, industrialization, and energy transition projects. However, headwinds continue to linger around geopolitical conflicts, supply chain disruptions, and commodity price volatility. Amidst all of this, the L&T will continue to focus on profitable execution of its very large order book in the backdrop of a relatively stable environment.
It is well positioned to exploit the emerging opportunities across its diversified business portfolio and limit its exposure to non-core businesses. The company remains committed to maximizing sustainable value for all its stakeholders.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for the patient hearing. We can now commence the Q&A.
Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the touch-tone telephone. If you wish to withdraw yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to please use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. The first question is from the line of Mohit Kumar from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Yes. Good evening. Congratulations on a very good set of numbers, especially the order inflow.
My first question is the order prospect. I think you mentioned that the order prospect declined QOQ. I think this is a very large drop. And also in the annual report, I think there was a comment that Saudi Aramco is postponing the CapEx program, which could have led to this decline. Can you confirm that this decline is primarily related to Aramco? And does it in any way impact the order inflow guidance for this asset?
Okay. So thanks, Mohit. Yes, at the start of the year, the order prospects that we talked about were around ₹12 trillion, and now it has come down to ₹9 trillion. The drop is largely witnessed in the hydrocarbon segment. And I would not like to specify the answer to a particular customer. I think there has been some amount of tendering that has happened where we have not secured.
Some of the projects have been shelved, and some of them have possibly been deferred. But this does not have any color in terms of whether there is any potential change with respect to our guidance for the order inflow for the full year. We still maintain what we gave at 10% order inflow. That guidance is still being maintained. But you can have some amount of order prospects getting deferred, and something we have lost also in that particular segment. However, I would not like to comment on specific customers, please. Understood. My second question is a news article in the Mint. It stated that L&T is eyeing the opportunity to make investments worth $50-$60 billion in projects converting oil to chemicals and petrochemicals in the Middle Eastern region. Are we looking to invest in those businesses?
Are we looking to invest in equities in some form? Is it the right understanding?
We are pursuing EPC opportunities in the oil to chemicals environment in the Middle East, which we believe will have overall investments made by our clients of the amounts that you are referring to. We're not looking to form any JV, blah, blah, blah. Is that right understanding? As far as the things stand, with specific reference to oil to chemicals, it is all the customers' investment, which is a sort of EPC opportunity for L&T.
Understood, sir. Thank you, sir. Thank you. All the best. Thank you.
Thank you, Mohit. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Sumit Kishore from Axis Capital. Please go ahead.
Good evening. My compliments on our start of the fiscal.
My question is, has there been any outreach by Andhra Pradesh to revise the Amaravati contracts that were dropped from L&T's order book in the past? And any expected roadmap for Amaravati going forward?
So, Sumit, yes, there has been, I think, initial discussions with the state government has commenced. But at this juncture, too early to comment on the exact how it will shape up. Hopefully, I think by the time we end September Q2, I think we will have a better visibility in terms of the revival of the various opportunities in Amaravati. But at least the discussions have commenced.
My second question is, your exchange filing has mentioned that your renewable EPC portfolio was of 18 gigawatt cumulative capacity, comprising solar and wind generation projects already commissioned and in the making.
So I just want to understand what is the size of renewable EPC, solar EPC in your order book presently, and what is the size of order prospects or opportunity that you see for RE EPC in the Middle East specifically?
So in terms of solar renewable, the order book, I think the approximate share would be anywhere in the range of ₹55,000 crore-₹60,000 crore. And as far as opportunities are concerned, that would be in the range of a similar number of ₹60,000 crore in the near term.
So in the order prospect, you have roughly about ₹600 billion for the balance three quarters?
Yeah, for the balance nine months. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Understood. Just one question on the color on the rationale of the ESG upgrade by MSCI to BB from BB.
Is there anything to do with your defense exposure, which they have taken a different view on? Or is that something else?
As far as we know, the rating rationale of changing from BB to BBB is on the back of an improved, I would say, environmental and the safety statistics that L&T has been pursuing. I think that is one of the reasons which has enabled us to get this rating upgrade. Insofar as our exposure through the precision engineering systems business to defense, I don't think there has been any change in the outlook of MSCI and that.
Got it. And this reconditioning of the energy power segment to carbon light, does it mean you will not bid for coal power projects? Or how should we read that?
So we are looking to focus on carbon capture projects and whatever manufacturing facility technical talents over a period of time will get into taking opportunities on those segments, Sumit. Having said this, we still have an order book of almost 5,000 crores in the thermal power business, which we will execute. And we will look at opportunities which are, like for example, we will continue to focus on any gas-based power plant opportunity that may come and any other cleaner fuel opportunities that we will be able to leverage our current manufacturing in. As far as the coal-based equipment are concerned over a period of time will get repurposed.
Understood. Thank you, and wish you all the best.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Aditya Bhartia from Investec. Please go ahead.
Hi, good evening, sir.
My first question is on the reduction in prospect pipelines, especially on the hydrocarbon side. Now, given that we are having a 10% reduction in overall prospect pipeline and we require almost like a 10%-12% kind of a growth in order inflows to meet the guidance, where exactly are things changing? Are we anticipating a much better strike rate in the domestic business, which it appears had fallen a bit last year?
Or is it that we are seeing competition being a little lesser on the domestic side this time?
Okay. So as I said at this juncture, no, Aditya, it's not correct for me to give a colour. I mean, overall, the prospects for the nine months, which kind of orders will enable us to maintain the order inflow growth guidance?
But I wish to tell you, given the fact that we still have a ₹9 trillion of order prospects, okay? And that is more or less balanced because last year, of course, the hydrocarbon part of the business did have a good set of orders. It's not necessary that every time you can have the same business having the same run rate. But given the fact, if you look at just basic arithmetic, if I have to come out, if I have to talk about meeting our order inflow guidance, what we see from the order prospects, I think a 22%-23% conversion or a hit rate will enable us to reach there. And this 22%-23% is not that something which is theoretical. We have demonstrated that in the recent past as well. Sure.
Just the second thing, you've spoken about labor availability issues and the potential of that to be slowing down execution. Where exactly are we seeing challenges? And have they worsened over the last year or so?
Okay. So two things. Let me be a little, I would say, topical here. In the Q1, when we have given the overall guidance on revenues of 15%, it had baked the fact that the Q1 would have been a little subdued for the larger part of what we call the infrastructure of the construction business in India because of the, I would say, because of the general elections. And you know very well that all this labor have the tendency to go back to their respective natives and vote. And plus, this was further worsened because of the very, very hot weather that was prevalent in large parts of the country.
So, this we hopefully, with the start of monsoon, of course, the monsoon has had a good start. This also has some implication into labor going into working on the agriculture side. But as far as we are concerned, I guess we should see back the normalcy of labor coming back to fulfill our execution of our order book. I think the point that is coming up is as India goes on expanding into investments in infrastructure or any industry, there is a time that we are looking at a shortage of skilled labor because it's also important while the country goes into a CapEx mode or an investment board across the investments of all these sectors, it is also important that we have a steady supply of skilled labor to ensure that the projects are getting completed on time. Now, that has a developing implication.
Now, as far as L&T is concerned, we are focusing to ensure that whatever labor we have through the various subcontractors, we continue to engage with them because we have a large order book, and simultaneously, we are also taking up steps to also ensure that the future inflow of labor is appropriately skilled because the order book that we are looking at, given the positive investment climate that we are witnessing in the near term, I think it is important that the labor doesn't become a constraint in the GDP growth of the country. To that extent, I think the government also has realized it, and if you see the Honorable Finance Minister coming out in her pronouncement in yesterday's budget, there is also sufficient mention of how they managed to bring this particular important resource.
Last but not the least, one more development is it's not that the labor is only working here in India. Some part of the labor is also getting exported to the neighboring countries, especially Middle East, given the set of opportunities. So we are working at, I would say, not necessarily an optimum level. But yes, if things persist like this going forward, there could be an implication. Understood, sir. And last bit, anything that you can share on the potential of monetization of Nabha Power or Hyderabad Metro? At this juncture, nothing to share. We are pursuing as far as I mean, it is still going on. As far as Nabha is concerned, Nabha Power is doing well. It is back on to, I would say, a reasonable set of profits it is doing. We are evaluating, but nothing to comment at this juncture.
Sure, sir.
Thank you so much.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Amit Mahawar from UBS. Please go ahead.
Hi, PS. I have just two quick questions. First, on the Middle Eastern market, can you throw some light on the execution positioning in the last six-to-eight months? Have we seen some delays in execution on most of the large Saudi Arabia project? Things are on time, and I want to broadly understand your comment on the competition, especially from the Korean and Chinese players, given that European and Japanese are not very active. That's one.
Okay. So in the Middle East today, Larsen & Toubro primarily, I would say, is engaged in hydropower projects and solar renewable projects.
As it stands now, the Q1 execution momentum that we have witnessed, there is nothing for us to bring to your attention to say that there is something unusual, increase or decrease. So it is as business as usual. Okay? So as far as competitive intensity is concerned, I would like to mention here that we believe that the size of the market, which markets are we referring? We are referring to the renewable part of investments that are happening and also the hydropower plants. And possibly going forward, there could be major investments happening on transit, be it on metro packages or rail packages. I think going forward, there is a large, I would say, investment activity expected to happen. And I feel that given the large size of the pie, each of the contractors have a fair share.
So, it's all a question of in some quarter we may get, in some quarter other competition may get. But structurally, I don't think there is any change for us to comment from the earlier comments that we made in the month of May.
Clear, clear. Thank you. And the second question is more on the core margins. If I see we've started the year with a good 60-70 basis point margin expansion in the infra side. And the reason we've given is execution cost savings. Is this execution cost saving maybe one-off quarterly in nature, or do you think for the full year we have a much better margin expectation? Anything on that, PS? Thank you.
So Amit, let me tell you, I think I did conclude on the speech saying that we are on track to more or less meet our targets at this juncture.
I think we have started off very well as far as the margins are concerned. The overall P&L margin last year was 7.4%. So we have managed to bring a 20 basis points improvement. And that improvement is actually coming from a, I would say, a reasonably large improvement that we have seen in the infrastructure segment. But as you're aware, the project business, the quarter on quarter, the job mix, the projects going into recognition threshold, completion of projects still keep on happening. But we have had a good start. And hopefully, I guess we should be maintaining the slight improvement in the margin momentum. But too early to comment on any change in the guidance. Kindly, I think maybe another two quarters before we finally see where the margin will likely end in the current year.
Thank you, PS, and good luck with the entire team. Thank you.
The next question is from the line of Priyankar Biswas from BNP Paribas Exane. Please go ahead.
Thanks for the opportunity. And congratulations to the team. So my first question is, PR, if you can explain about since we have a FY26 ROE target of 18%, and so we are kind of just a little below 15%. So what is the bridge from this current 14.5-15% levels to attaining this 18% level? If you can shed some light on that first.
So Priyankar, I guess this we have been talking in multiple calls like this and also in the investor meetings. So today, if you talk about, I guess if I have to make it very simple, the 1% increase would be if Hyderabad Metro were to make zero profit, zero loss. So as I was talking, that particular investment had a loss of almost ₹214 crores in Q1.
Over a period of time, if you are able to bring that down, so that will demonstrate at least a 1% increase in the ROE. The second 1% would be, as we have been talking about, that the L&T is looking at, given the fact that we are having a cautious approach to increasing the size of our balance sheet. We are also looking at keeping the balance sheet a little more leaner, which also means we are looking at a 1% improvement on the account of higher payouts to shareholders. Now, in what form, I guess that we have to see, especially in the development in the budget yesterday. We have to look at it. But definitely, 1% can be attributed to, I would say, payouts to, I mean, capital restructuring in terms of larger payouts.
The last 1% is the overall margin improvement in the P&M part of the traditional business of Projects and Manufacturing. I just give a simple explanation of the bridge from 15%-18%. In what forms what happens, only the next two years will see.
So since last year, particularly the payout levels were quite high. So should we be expecting? I am not going into what form of the payout, but similar payouts like last year?
I have given you our bridge. You asked me a question about the bridge, which I have given you. Now, when the payout will happen in what form, I guess only time will tell.
And P.S., just one more question from my side. So there has been this news of the collaboration for Saudi Aramco projects.
We have also seen that if Saudi Aramco's own CapEx guidance for this year, they seem to have factored in a YoY increase, especially with the gas projects. So is there any reason why the Middle Eastern hydrocarbon projects have been cut? Prospects have been cut down. So what exactly is it derived from?
So of course, I wish to tell you that structurally, I believe Saudi hydrocarbon spend for FY24 is almost $48 billion. And next year is going to be around $60 billion or so. And this is as per the public domain, whatever messages are coming out. Yes, there can be some reallocation of projects in that overall pie. Maybe the percentage of oil could come down, oil exploration and production. But as far as gas-based opportunities are concerned, oil-to-chemical opportunities are concerned, I think all those plans are still on.
We are working with the clients like any other contracting company, closely with the client. And hopefully, we should get some of those opportunities in our favor in the near term.
So, yes, my question was more like on the outlook for the Middle East hydrocarbon prospects. So since you highlighted the Saudis, it's actually going up. So here the prospects going down. So I'm just trying to reconcile that. So is it from Saudi?
No, no. This is a point. So Priyankar, it is for the next nine months, okay? It's for the next nine months. No. So we also are working closely with the various clients. Let's not stick to only Saudi Arabia. We are also looking at other countries as well, be it UAE, Qatar, also some of the oil-producing countries in North Africa. There are some opportunities out there.
But I feel it is specific to one quarter, this has come down. But I don't think this is any at this juncture for us to say there is a structural drop in the overall opportunity landscape.
Okay. Thanks, PR. That's very clear now.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Parikshit Kandpal from HDFC Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi PR. Congratulations on a decent quarter, sir. So my first question is on increasing exposure of international in the order book. So will it have any impact on the margins? So given that we have given 8.2% of guidance for P&M margins for FY25 and the share of international has been increasing. So will that impact our guidance on P&M, sir?
So PR, I think Parikshit, yeah, the only thing which I would like to mention is all the international projects are largely fixed-price contracts.
If we continue to perform in line with the completion deadline of those contracts and the input costs remain what they are, so I think the margin trajectory should not at all worsen. In fact, if you are able to complete the projects on time, I don't see a reason why margins, even for these fixed-price contracts, can improve. But as it stands now, since we refer to margin guidance to the extent of that particular year, this year, based on the construct of the various projects that are getting into execution more across the segments, across the geography. We have maintained the target at 8.2%-8.25% for FY25. Q1 has started off with a, I would say, good start. In fact, if you see the margins for the Energy segment, actually has come down.
But it is only because of the state of execution of the jobs in the segment. So hopefully, I guess you should see an improvement out there as well. But I wish to tell you that if you are able to complete the jobs on time on the international order book, definitely margins could be more positive than what we are looking at today.
Okay. And the second question was on domestic ordering, domestic prospect pipeline. So some of the segments we are seeing that government may increase the PPP share. So government intent is to increase the PPP share. Like in T&D, we are already seeing the TBCB, and then in roads, BOT is getting revised. So do you think there is a case for you? And maybe in railways also some kind of PPP may emerge.
So is there any case for you to come back and have a relook at equity way of investing into these projects, given that it may reduce your prospect pipeline if you don't do that?
Parikshit, the order prospects that I've given for construction part of the business, no. They are all what we are planning to bid for. And these are all projects that are on out-and-out EPC basis. There aren't any, I would say, significant BOT opportunities. And I think L&T has made a clear statement that we would not like to pursue the investments onto the concessions part of the business.
Okay. This is the last question on the arbitration bid.
So, I mean, we have, so if you can help us quantify what would be the total arbitration claims or currently in progress, and do you think some point of time in this year, if the Amaravati thing plays out and there's some revivals, do you think there could be some tailwinds to a margin uptake positively with the claims coming back by the government? So if you can help us understand a bit or give some more color on the arbitration thing.
So, Parikshit, I think I answered to this question as far as Amaravati jobs are concerned. Discussions have started. That itself is a positive development. And hopefully, I guess the discussions have commenced itself is positive. Now, how will the discussion pan out in terms of revival of which part of the projects, recovery of which part of the money?
I think it's still too early to comment upon, but this is a very, very positive outcome. Now, its impact on margins and all of that, how arbitration awards whether coming in our favor, going against us, I think it's a part of the overall contracting business, but specific to Amaravati thing, it is a positive development.
But what will be the overall arbitration pipeline? Because I understand EP alone was about, if I remember, in some past calls you mentioned about, I think 1,500-1,600 crores was the pending receivables. So correct me if that is still the number. And overall, what could be the arbitration pipeline right now in terms of the overall company?
So Parikshit, I think if we have to really give a data statistic of how much of claims that the company is pursuing against its various projects with its customers.
And it's also important that some of the customers also have counterclaims on L&T. So this all goes into a negotiation mode. It is very, very inappropriate for me to come out with a call to actually put out a number. It is only when we believe that a claim is coming out to a place where the customer and L&T have in principle agreed to settle. At that point of time, it is reckoned in the P&L.
Okay. And just on the Hyderabad metro, if you can help, I mean, because of this government issue. So how are you chasing it now? So how do you think that ridership will play out? And in terms of government support, has anything come in versus the last quarter support which was supposed to come? So if you can update us on that.
Yeah. Okay. So the ridership in Q4 was 4.32.
Sorry, Q1. This current quarter was 4.32. Some amount of impact is there because of the free bus scheme to ladies. But definitely, one of the reasons for a small drop in ridership with compared to Q4, which was at 4.42, is because Q1 was just summer months and holidays and so on. So as we are getting into Q2, the average ridership on a weekday, that is Monday to Friday, it goes up to almost ranging between 4.8-5. And during weekends, it comes down to maybe 3.5-3.7. So there will be a steady increase in ridership. But I guess the ridership improvement is not resolving the issue that we have. I think it's more to do with the fact that how do we reduce the current debt of almost 12,500 crores to the entity?
So, up till now, we have received around INR 900-odd crores from the government in terms of that soft loan. Hopefully, I think the government should be proactive enough to provide the balance, INR 2,100 crore of loans that has been cleared in the assembly in the last year or so. So I guess still discussions are happening. Once those things come, definitely will enable us to bring down the current loans and lower the interest cost and thereby at least reduce the losses.
Okay. Sure. Thank you. Those were my questions. I'm sure that does.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Nidhisha from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Hello. Am I audible? Yes, you're audible.
Yes, you're audible.
Thank you so much for taking my question and congratulations on an amazing quarter. So I have two questions.
Firstly, what do you think about the offshore wind business in the medium term? As per the annual report, it looks like the company is pursuing bids in offshore projects globally. That is the first one. And the second is that how is green hydrogen opportunities panning out? Are the discussions progressing like we had hoped? And are there more closures of projects in the near term?
Okay. So Nidhi, as a start, no. I guess during the current quarter, we did get an offshore wind project because an international project that is almost just about $100 million or so. I think it's the first foray for L&T to get into this business where we are leveraging primarily our offshore skills in the hydrocarbons part of the business into this offshore wind part of the business. So it's one of the first orders.
I think it's a good thing to start with having got such an order from a very prestigious client. And we believe that this part of the business is a little more complicated than any other normal wind business. I think we have to be careful, and it's a little more CapEx intensive. We will pursue these opportunities because we feel that this is a sustainable, I would say, CapEx that is going to happen in this particular renewable Energy segment, not necessarily like in emerging markets. India is also talking about it. But I guess some of the European markets will definitely look into these kinds of investments that augurs well for us. But to start with, as I said, we have secured one of the first orders. So hopefully, I think we should be getting more and executing them properly as well.
Your second question was on – I missed that.
Green hydrogen. How are the opportunities panning out? Are the discussions progressing like we had hoped? Are there any new closures on projects on specifically green hydrogen?
We did get a first project opportunity from green hydrogen with a private sector client to set up an electrolyzer unit. We are evaluating various options and various opportunities. In terms of what we call a meaningful opportunity, it is the IOCL tender that we are looking to bid through our joint venture with IOCL itself, IOCL and ReNew. It is too early days in terms of trying to look at the overall size of this market. As I mentioned, the order prospects pipeline as of June for this green energy part is still around, I would say, INR 10,000 crore-odd.
It's too early stage, but we believe that this will get scaled up in the next one and a half to two years to something much more meaningful. Because all the players, be it the developers or be it the customers, all of them are evaluating the opportunity in terms of the scalability, the saleability of the end product. Because obviously, there is some amount of cost that has to be higher than what is the current end product, which is using either a black or a blue hydrogen. I think it will be a transition phase. But we are looking at both domestic and also adjacent geographies for EPC solutions in this particular area.
All right. And you mentioned the IOCL project. So what is basically the progress on the bidding part of it?
When this gets tendered out finally, what do we expect the timelines to be on this?
The bids have been opened. It is a 10-KTPA kind of a project. There are two bidders, I believe, I mean, ours and another bidder. The bids have been submitted. It is up to IOCL to take the next steps on this.
All right. At this point, there is no visibility on when the bids could be closed and when the contractors will close.
As I said, the bids have been submitted, the price bids. There are two bidders. The customer will have to take a call, which I believe should be in the near term. We cannot comment on the timelines per se.
All right. Thank you so much.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Amit Binde from Morgan Stanley.
Please go ahead. Amit, the line for you has been unmuted. You may proceed with your question. As we're not receiving a response from the current participant, we will proceed to the next question, which will be from the line of Pulkit Patni from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Hi PR. Just one question. This has been a quarter where the dominance both on top line as well as the order inflow has been by the international business. And your margins have at the margin improved a little bit. So any read-across on how we should look at margin in the next few quarters, given that domestic should actually come back in terms of its bigger contribution on the overall revenue footprint? So any sense on how we should look at margins in the next few quarters in light of what we saw in Q1?
Pulkit, if you were to break up this P&M revenue into domestic, international, I think the international part of the business did well, considering that there were no constraints per se. Whereas on the domestic side, there were constraints in terms of the heat and also the election season. Going forward, I guess we will come back to, I would say, complete normalcy. Not that when we gave the guidance of revenues of 15%, we were not aware of this aspect, that the domestic part of execution could be a little more subdued in Q1. All of that is baked into our guidance. Insofar as margins are concerned, margins would be a combination of the project mix and whatever we talk about, utilization, execution, ramp-up, some of the projects to cross the margin recognition threshold.
All of this is an aggregate, including favorable claim settlements or settlements of the clients on the other side. So it's a combination of those. We have had a good start into Q1 as far as the margins are concerned. The P&M margins, as I said earlier, have improved by 20 basis points. And I believe that we don't have anything for us to comment for the balance nine months where we have an indicator to say margins could be a little softer than what we have demonstrated in Q1. But too early to comment on the landing part of the yearly FY25 guidance on margins. But at this juncture, we have had a good start.
Sure. No problem, PR. That's the only question. Thank you.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Bharanidhar Vijayakumar from Avendus Spark. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Good evening, sir.
Am I audible?
You are, Bharanidhar.
Okay. Great. So can you brief us on your capabilities on nuclear and what are the upcoming opportunities there? There was a recent Karnataka order that was just bagged by. So can you just talk on that nuclear portion?
So the nuclear, see, okay. As far as nuclear is concerned, we cover almost, I believe, the length and breadth of a nuclear power plant right from full-scale construction, including the turbine island, the nuclear island, and all of the balance of plant. So of course, there can always be hits and misses in the highly competitive landscape that we have. But as far as the construction part is concerned, going forward, I think the order prospects that we have in the nuclear construction part, I think, would be in the range of maybe around INR 7,000 crore to INR 10,000-odd crore.
The near next nine months of prospects in this particular part.
Okay. And this would be largely NPCIL's project?
Nuclear in India is largely NPCIL. Second question is on this aspect. What I said was nuclear power plant construction and related mechanical works. When it comes to specific, because the government is also talking about diversifying into the smaller and modular reactors, the BARC reactors and all, these all will be opportunities besides this. Beyond this, what I just gave you, 7,000-10,000-odd crores relating to only the further projects of NPCIL in this particular segment.
Right. So the upcoming initiatives by the government and its plans, so where would we come in in that? Where would we be contributing? Is it significant?
I think, as I mentioned earlier, we do have a full-scale capability in this segment, having worked very closely with NPCIL across most of the nuclear power plant installations in the country. I think it's a question of joint effort, and we will be able to meet up to those requirements. Incidentally, our Heavy Engineering division, which is forming part of our Projects and Manufacturing, is already pre-qualified on the smaller and modular reactors to supply them. So technically, they are qualified. So all the question of when the customer wants to start investing on those.
My final question is on Saudi Arabian opportunities. So are we looking at these NEOM projects like New Murabba, The Line, these kinds of projects apart from hydrocarbon and renewables?
The focus of Saudi Arabia, I mean, as far as the Middle East is concerned, we continue to focus on renewables and hydrocarbons apart from road and railway projects. Road project means I'm referring to railway projects and also metro packages in various parts of the Middle East.
Understood. So basically, these other urban infrastructure projects like The Line, the New Murabba, so that we are right now not focusing on.
The order prospects that I talked about with respect to the international order prospects, largely factors that kind of proposals that I just now referred to.
Okay. Understood all of it.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Nikhil Nigania from Bernstein. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thank you for taking my question. I had just one question.
Now that we have such a big exposure to the Middle East, we have been talking about the local employment requirements. But what we read from other EPC companies globally is that there are local sourcing requirements as well. So wanted to check, does L&T also have local sourcing requirements, and do we see a risk of delays due to these requirements in the Middle East?
So Nikhil, I mean, as we have grown big in many of these places, I guess we are also in line with the requirements that are being put forward by these jurisdictions. In fact, most of our Saudi orders are actually getting awarded to the local subsidiary of L&T there. It's not getting awarded to the parent L&T and the group in India.
And as part of the local subsidiaries, I would say capabilities, there is need to put up proper project management, resource staffing. Everything else is being done. And all of this is getting appropriately priced in the contract.
Understood. So you don't see broadly risk of delays given your experience there and given the setup there. That's what I should take a look at?
At this juncture, no.
Understood. Got it. Thank you. That's all I wanted to ask.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Srinidhi Karlekar from HSBC. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thank you for the opportunity and congratulations on a good set of numbers. Couple of questions from my end. PR, just wanted to hear your thoughts on the domestic private Capex cycle with election uncertainty behind us. How is L&T seeing from this end market?
So Srinidhi, the domestic private CapEx that we are looking at and we see a lot of traction, I think, is first in the area of real estate. Okay? Now, when I talk about real estate, I take all the colors of real estate from residential to commercial to, I would say, hybrid city development or to even data centers. I guess there has been a big jump into this particular segment, and all of that is happening through private sector CapEx itself. As far as the other part of private CapEx is concerned, one can look at only either two areas. One is the concessions part with the public-private CapEx, and the other one is investments into pure industrials or new age sectors.
As far as investments in the industrials are concerned, all the entities that are directly related to the construction part of the overall infrastructure space, that is cement, steel, paints, fittings, and all, all the end manufacturers are looking to increase their capacities, either greenfield or brownfield. And in some of those expansions, L&T also has got, I would say, some amount of contracts. Having said this, the value of such contract of building a factory building will be in the range of, say, INR 200-300 crores. So that's not going to materially move the needle for us. But I would like to reaffirm that segments that are directly related to the overall infrastructure, especially on the real estate, I think there is a positive momentum.
The one aspect where the momentum, which is possibly a little subdued or possibly even missing, would be the public-private CapEx part because that is the large investment. Now, in that case of investments happening, L&T also has a good chance to bid for such kind of projects as an EPC contractor. I think that is still some time away. But having said this, I believe going forward with the continuity and the stability of the government's focus on investments on the GDP led through investment-related growth in the next five years or so, I guess we could see some large-ticket investments happening into the new age sectors. Apart from data centers, which is again an extension of real estate, but into data centers.
But new age sectors like electronics manufacturing or semiconductor manufacturing, those things could come up in sizable amounts, but it is still early days for us to conclude on that.
Right. So good to hear. And sir, what I wanted to also ask is on the Hyderabad Metro TOD pipeline. Last year, we had good numbers. How is prospect pipeline for the TOD monetization looking like for this financial year?
So we still have TOD monetization of almost 14.9 million sq ft. But each of those monetizations requires the prior approval of the government. So out of this 14.9, we already have a 1.3 million developed infrastructure in terms of either malls or commercial establishments. We will be looking forward to monetize them over a period of time.
Upon receipt of the approval, that particular transaction will get consummated in that specific quarter, like the way it happened, I think, in Q2 of the previous year.
Great. And the last one, if I may, so you gave a number on the solar EPC backlog that you have. May I ask you to please repeat that? It's 60,000 crores, around 60,000 crores as a backlog. And other prospects also in and around the same value. And sir, how is this split across domestic and international?
Largely international. So what is really happening that in domestic solar EPC, L&T seems to be less aggressive or say less active in winning the bids?
So the kind of solar or renewable packages international, the sizes are large. Okay? Whereas we don't get such kind of large parcels in India for this kind of investment.
So obviously, then it becomes sub-optimization of your entire resources. So we are focusing on the renewable international opportunities only on the solar side. As far as renewables are concerned in India, I guess for the benefit of all, what we are looking at something as a good investment that are happening, which L&T also is getting, I would say, some amount of traction in terms of orders, is on pumped storage projects.
Great. Well, thank you for answering my questions and all the very best
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Girish Achhipalia from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, sir. Girish here. Sorry, we had a technical issue and dropped off. Sir, the question was, and sorry if I'm repeating it. So you mentioned that domestic revenue growth was weaker because of possibly two things. One was heat wave and excess heat wave.
And secondly, also because of the election cycle. Now, quarter two is also having a lesser number of construction dates possibly because of all the excess rain that we are seeing right now. So is it possible that the domestic revenue execution likely picks up more in second half? And then I had just one follow-up question on the prospect list.
Okay. So Girish, while we gave a guidance of revenue uptick on the 15% group level, in fact, the Projects and Manufacturing part of the portfolio also will be in and around the same levels itself. [It] has factored subdued domestic growth in Q1, a little more improved traction in Q2, and H2 will be the best second half as far as revenue or execution of projects in India is concerned. Okay? So that is built in.
Hopefully, I think the Q2 conditions is far more better than what we have seen in Q1 because Q1, we had the twin problems of shortage of labor due to elections and also extreme heat. Although we tried to bring down the effect by having shifts early in the morning and late in the afternoon, but that will not enable the full productivity for a continuous working eight or nine hours at the site level. So Q2 should be better, and hopefully, H2 will take the line share of the growth as far as domestic is concerned. As for international is concerned, I guess Q1 was like any other quarter, and I don't foresee per se unless there are other geopolitical events that we are not aware of happen. I think the ramp-up of execution and the international side will be more or less equal over the four quarters. Perfect.
Understood. Sir, because you do a bottom-up analysis of the prospect pipeline, if it's comfortable to share on a year-on-year basis for the first quarter ending now, prospect list in terms of how central versus state versus private versus how that is moved and for international, any delta around country level, whether it's Saudi Arabia or it's Qatar, if you can share any qualitative colors or quantitative colors here.
So, Girish, I think the amount of construct or breakup we are giving between domestic, international, and across the subsegment, I thought, is quite detailed enough. Now, if you were to talk about construction.
The reason I asked is because, as you know, I mean, this is a shortened year. I was more focused around how states are behaving versus central PSUs. That was largely it.
If any colors that you can provide at a country level and international, that will just help.
So as far as India-based prospects are concerned, if I had to break up the India-based prospects, then the central-state PSU and private, I think we don't see anything unusual other than 15, 25, 35, 25 combination, which is 15% central government-sponsored projects. State government projects account for almost 25%. Public sector corporations or state-owned companies, 35%. And private sector in largely the real estate and some of the various sectors that I'm looking at is at 25%. Okay? That's the way, as far as the India prospects are concerned, the breakup.
Now, in terms of the international prospects, which I talked about, which is almost INR 3.87 trillion as for the balance nine months, I think the major share of that is almost 50% of that is coming from hydrocarbons. And the balance is largely coming from a combination of the various subsegments under infra, but led through the power transmission distribution. So going through that methodology, one can say if you are to take a breakup of the geography out of this 3.87, almost 45% could be from Saudi.
Okay. And sir, one small follow-up, bookkeeping. Other income has dropped sequentially by 12%. I don't know if you've covered this, but is there any one-off in the base quarter in Q4, or how should we read the Q1 number at INR 920-odd crore?
So we have given that other income has dropped in Q1 of the previous year because of the drop in investments that we had as standal
one. Okay. It's dropped sequentially also. But is it because of yield, or is it just the number of the cash balance being the way it is?
It's more of a cash balancing. Other income, as far as Q1 of previous year is concerned, at the standalone, there is almost a drop of almost 10,000-odd crores in surplus between June 2023 to June 2024 because of the buyback. That had an impact on the other income drop.
Okay. And the CapEx number for this year would be about 3-3.5 thousand crores?
Around that range. Yeah. Around 4,000. Yeah. 4,000. Yeah.
Okay. Okay. Thank you so much, sir.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we have no further questions.
I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. P. Ramakrishnan for closing comments. Over to you, sir.
Thank you, everyone, for attending this call at this late hour. It was our pleasure to interact with all of you. Good luck and wishing you all the very best. Good night. Thank you. On behalf of Larsen & Toubro Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you all for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.