Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to the JSW Energy 2QFY26 earnings conference call, hosted by Motilal Oswal. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star and then zero on your touch-tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Abhishek Nigam from Motilal Oswal. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Yeah, thank you, Sharad. Hello, everyone. Good evening, and thank you for joining JSW Energy 2QFY26 earnings call. Tonight, we have with us Mr. Sharad Mahendra, Joint MD and CEO, Mr. Pritesh Vinay, Director of Finance and CFO, and Mr. Vikas Choudhury, Head of Strategic Finance and Investor Relations. And now, without any further delay, I will hand it over to Mr. Sharad Mahendra for opening comments. Over to you, sir.
Yeah. Yeah, good evening, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for JSW Energy's Quarter 2 FY26 earnings call. The second quarter of this current fiscal has marked a pivotal turnaround for the power sector. We have witnessed a 1.6% decline in Quarter 1. We witnessed a significant uptick in power demand in Quarter 2, which witnessed 3.3% year-on-year, 449 billion units, and H1 demand by 0.8% on year. The resurgence was driven by a healthy uptick in industrial activity and improving economic sentiment, further supported by a favorable base effect.
Remarkably, this uptick came despite an uptick, sorry, despite an extended monsoon, underscoring the resilience of India's power sector demand. Peak demand during the quarter reached 230 gigawatts in August, remaining consistent with levels seen in the corresponding quarter on the previous year. Sorry. India's total installed generation, excuse me, over the past 12 months, 48 gigawatts have been added, with 33 gigawatts in 16 gigawatts commissioned in H1 and Quarter 2, respectively. Renewable energy continues to lead this expansion, contributing 25 gigawatts during the half year, 22 gigawatts from solar, and three gigawatts from wind.
For thermal, the current installed capacity is 245 gigawatts. Considering the bidding of 15 gigawatts of projects awarded in FY25 and approximately 35 gigawatts of capacity under construction, all these capacities shall be commissioned in the next five to seven years. With this, India's total thermal capacity in FY32 should reach close to 300 gigawatts. We have witnessed thermal bids from various states totaling to 11.6 gigawatts this half year. As you are aware, we have backed Salboni 1,600 megawatts last fiscal and have additional optionality of 1,800 megawatts of brownfield expansion at KSK.
Recently, we have received an LOA of 400 megawatts for our 700 megawatts Utkal plant, which is currently an open capacity. Once this LOA is converted to PPA, it will further enhance our cash flow predictability and our open capacity from currently at 8% to 5%. For the country, renewables accounted for 18% of total electricity generated during this quarter, up from 15% in the same period last year. Wind generation saw one of its strongest performances, with nation's PLFs rising from 31.7% to 34.9%. Hydro generation also surged, reaching 68 billion units, a 13% year-on-year increase, thanks to better hydrology and a favorable monsoon.
The merchant market remained soft, with day-ahead prices averaging INR 3.92 per unit on exchanges, declining both sequentially and annually, impacted by record capacity additions and muted demand. As shared in the previous call, we have proactively de-risked our portfolio by tying up our imported coal-based Vijayanagar plant with our group company, JSW Steel, and others. This strategic move has significantly reduced our exposure to merchant volatility and ensured stable returns. Further, the recent LOA of 400 megawatts at Utkal will reduce our exposure to the merchant market going forward.
Even on our current untied capacity, our domestic coal-based exposure is 788 megawatts out of total merchant exposure of approximately 1.1 gigawatts. This ensures feasibility of the plant to generate attractive dark spreads even at lower merchant prices. Coal prices continued to moderate, averaging $91 per ton during the quarter, down from $110 per ton in Quarter 2 FY25. Post-quarter-end, prices have further softened to around $81 per ton. This should help us. Our imported open thermal capacity to record better Dark Spreads, benefiting from the lower fuel cost.
On the RE bidding front, the first half of FY26 saw cumulative generation bids of close to five gigawatts and storage bids of approximately three gigawatts. On the macro environment, the recent GST rationalization has been a welcome reform. For renewables, it lowers capital costs and will translate into more competitive tariffs. For thermal power plants using domestic coal, the removal of INR 400 per ton of Compensation Cess and the streamlined GST structure will reduce fuel costs and improve overall generation economics. These changes will strengthen the financial health of DISCOMs and support long-term sector sustainability.
From a regulatory standpoint, there are some anticipated changes from recent renewable consumption obligations framework and new draft amendments of the Electricity Act, which are sector positives. At JSW Energy, our strategic focus remains on both energy security and energy sustainability with disciplined capital allocation. To share with you the highlights of our performance for the quarter, which has been marked by significant progress across multiple fronts. In the current quarter, our generation saw a robust increase of 52% year-on-year, rising from 9.8 billion units to 14.9 billion units.
Further, our H1 FY26 marked a 60% increase in generation year-on-year, from 17.7 billion units to 28.4 billion units. This is at a time when the industry has registered a subdued demand growth of 3.3% year-on-year during the quarter and only 0.8% year-on-year in H1. Acquisition and integration of KSK and O2 Power, along with organic capacity additions in the areas of solar, wind, hydro from our Kutehr unit and Ind-Barath unit 2, has expanded this generation base for us. Over the past 12 months, we have added 5.5 gigawatts of capacity, including 3.3 gigawatts of renewable and 1.8 gigawatts of thermal, which has significantly contributed to our EBITDA growth.
This includes inorganic capacity of 1.5 gigawatts renewable and 1.8 gigawatts thermal. During the current quarter, we successfully added 443 megawatts of new capacity, and thus taking our installed capacity to 13.2 gigawatts. This represents a remarkable year-on-year growth, approximately 71%, up from 7.74 gigawatts in the same period last year. Among these additions, I am proud to highlight the commissioning of our greenfield Kutehr 240 megawatt hydro generation plant, wind capacity commissioning of 148 megawatts, and solar of 56 megawatts.
Earlier, we had commissioned 5 megawatts of agrivoltaic in Vijayanagar, and now we commissioned our first 20 megawatt floating solar project again in Vijayanagar. This showcases our ability to deliver long-term sustainable innovative energy solutions. Further, our 240 megawatt Kutehr hydro power plant is one of the fastest greenfield hydro projects to be completed in India. We'd like to highlight that despite facing challenges such as COVID-19 disruptions, lockdowns, and extreme weather conditions, we executed this project in under six years. The timing of the commissioning allowed us to capitalize on the high generation season in Quarter 2, resulting in an impressive 58% PLF from this plant for the operational days of the quarter.
Looking ahead, our under-construction portfolio remains robust. We are currently building 12.5 gigawatts of generation projects, all of which are fully tied up under long-term power purchase agreements. Upon completion, our installed capacity will nearly double to approximately 26 gigawatts. This includes new PPAs signed during the quarter for 230 megawatts under SECI FDRE 4 and 100 megawatts solar plus 100 megawatts of battery energy storage system. In our hydro portfolio, Karcham Wangtoo and Baspa plants exceeded design energy generation by 16% in Quarter 2 and 13% in H1 of FY26.
As highlighted earlier, our newly commissioned Kutehr plant further strengthens our hydro capabilities and unlocks new synergies. We had earlier guided a capital expenditure of ₹130,000 crores by 2030 to achieve our Strategy 3.0 capacity announced at 30 gigawatts, along with 40 gigawatt-hours of energy storage. The opportunity of growth in this sector is immense, and we are committed to pursuing it in a calibrated and strategic manner. To ensure predictability in execution and to reaffirm our unwavering commitment to deliver value to all our stakeholders, we continue to take deliberate steps towards organic growth, both in RE and thermal.
This approach aligns with our recent partnership with SANY for wind turbine manufacturing and our decision to pause our solar module manufacturing plans. I am pleased to share three strategic developments during the quarter. First and foremost is the acquisition of GE Power India's boiler manufacturing unit. We have entered into a scheme of arrangement with GE Power India to acquire its boiler manufacturing business. This acquisition significantly enhances our in-house capabilities with both technology and people, which is very critical for equipment manufacturing and supports our thermal power expansion plan.
Next is the majority stake in KSK Water Infrastructure. After the acquisition of KSK Mahanadi, we have successfully completed the acquisition of a majority stake in KSK Water Infrastructure. This entity currently supplies raw water to our 1,800 megawatt KSK Mahanadi thermal power plant and is equipped to support an additional 1,800 megawatt, ensuring readiness for our future expansion. Next is the battery assembly plant in Pune. As previously communicated, we are in the process of establishing a battery assembly plant in Pune with a rated capacity of 5 gigawatt-hour per annum.
This facility dedicated to supporting battery energy storage systems is expected to be operational in the current quarter, that is, Quarter 3 of FY26. It will also enable us to meet domestic content requirements for BESS as and when they are mandated by Government of India. As part of our continued strategic growth, I am pleased to share that we have signed a definitive agreement to acquire 150 megawatt Tidong Hydro Power Plant from Statkraft at an enterprise value of INR 1,728 crores. This plant is at a very advanced stage of completion and expected to be commissioned by October 2026.
This plant has a 22-year power purchase agreement with Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation for 75 megawatts, while the remaining capacity offers attractive potential in the merchant power market. This acquisition will not only strengthen our hydro portfolio but will also bring in a highly skilled team with deep expertise in hydroelectric power. Their experience will be invaluable as we advance our pumped storage projects. We are already the largest IPP in the hydro sector, and this acquisition further cements our leadership position. In our energy products and service segment, we signed battery energy storage agreements for 680 megawatt-hour, taking our total locked-in capacity to 29.4 gigawatt-hour.
Also, the trial runs for our 3,800 tons per annum green hydrogen project at Vijayanagar are near complete, and we expect the commissioning very soon in the current quarter of FY26, that is, Q3 of FY26. Looking ahead, we continue to integrate the recent acquisitions of KSK Mahanadi and O2 Power into our operations, significantly strengthening our capabilities. With 2.3 gigawatts of capacity already added in H1 of FY26, we are well positioned to achieve our generation capacity target in excess of 15 gigawatts by end of current fiscal. Lastly, I want to reiterate our focus on execution excellence, efficient capital allocation, and stakeholder value creation.
With a high quality, largely tied up under-construction portfolio, we are confident in our ability to sustain this growth trajectory and deliver superior returns. Thank you, and with this, now I pass on to Pritesh to talk about the financial performance for the quarter. Thank you. Thank you very much, Sharad, and a very good evening to all of you. As Sharad mentioned, there's been a significant addition in our installed capacity on a year-on-year basis. September last year, we were at 7.7 gigawatts of operational capacity, whereas we ended September 25 at 13.2 gigawatts.
And all of this has led to the net generation for the quarter being up by 52% year-on-year, which translated to a total revenue which was up by 55% at over INR 5,300 crores. And the EBITDA for the quarter went up by 67% to just under INR 3,200 crores. With the additional capitalization of newer assets that have come on the balance sheet, there is a higher interest and depreciation commensurately, which has led to the profit before tax being down by 35% for the current quarter compared to the last year. I'm sorry, the profit after tax actually being down by 17% compared to last year at about INR 705 crores.
But more importantly for us, the cash profit generation was up by 27% year-on-year at over INR 1,500 crores. From a half-year performance point of view, for the first half of this year, we have already crossed the EBITDA that we generated in the entire last fiscal year, and the EBITDA for the half year stood at over 6,200 crores. Our profit after tax for the half year was up by almost 5% to close to 1,450 crores, and the cash profit after tax stood at more than 3,000 crores. From a balance sheet point of view, the net debt at the end of September quarter stood at close to 62,000 crores.
It has sequentially gone up by about 2,500 crores compared to June end. The total amount of CapEx that we have spent in this quarter is about 3,500 crores. We've also capitalized some amount of ongoing projects like Kutehr and some RE projects, because of which the total net debt, which is stuck in capital work in progress, has marginally come down by about INR 400 crores during the quarter and stood at about INR 12,500 crores, so if we look at the operational assets, the total debt to the total EBITDA on a TPM basis stood at just under five times.
The weighted average cost of debt has marginally come down with a reset of some of the current facilities and went up by close to 10 basis points sequentially. We expect this trajectory to continue in the next couple of quarters as more facilities reach their reset date, so the easing up of interest rates that we've seen in the markets will start translating into our borrowing cost as well. The receivables trend continued to be very healthy. The total amount of outstanding receivables at the end of September was INR 3,500 crores, which translated to a day's sales outstanding of 64 days.
This was an improvement compared to 70 days at the same time last year. With that, I'll stop here and operator, if you can take we can open the floor for Q&A, please. Thank you. Thank you so much. We will now begin with the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and then one on the touch-tone phone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and then two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles.
Participants are also requested to ask only two questions each and rejoin the queue for any follow-up questions.
Our first question comes from the line of Mohit Kumar from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good evening, sir, and thanks for the opportunity. My first question is on the financials. Is it possible to explain the lower EBITDA at Karcham and Baspa during the quarter? The EBITDA came at INR 3.8 billion. However, we believe the generation was better compared to last year.
So Mohit, you must be aware, and there's a Supreme Court order on the Karcham side, on the free power. So on a YOY basis, the incremental amount of free power, which earlier last year we were selling in the merchant market, is now being supplied to the Government of Himachal Pradesh under the implementation agreement, right? So that is a primary reason why, from an EBITDA point of view, at the hydro business, you are seeing a lower YOY trend, yeah?
On the Ind-Barath EBITDA, is it lower QOQ? Is it primarily due to merchant impact, or is there any one-off?
You see, in case of Ind-Barath, there is a scheduled shutdown of the units, keeping in mind the same. That is the only reason. There is no other reason. All the annual maintenance, annual overhauling is complete. So second half of the year, keeping in mind to take care of the seasonal demand, which is better normally in H2, so it was a seasonal annual shutdown only, which is a planned shutdown.
Understood, sir. My last question is, what is the purpose of acquiring GE Power assets? Is it possible to manufacture the complete boiler or only pressure-pot for the boiler? What is the strategy to utilize this asset to build our own thermal power plant? Yeah.
See, one thing we have to understand is the way we have seen in last maybe about 18 months, the amount of thermal bids which are coming in and the PPAs with the way it is getting signed. There definitely has been a constraint in terms of timely supplies to meet the PPA timelines from the existing suppliers for boiler turbine generator. So keeping that thing in mind, this is a facility which is a technology which is very well established and a presently running facility, though not making new pressure like the pressure parts or the parts for the new boiler, but servicing the existing customers, which has the full facility to produce a new.
So yes, always, whichever boiler plant, whether it is of any other company or GE, it is a mix of pressure parts mostly being made within the plant. The non-critical and other things, normally there are, it is outsourced also. This is the way other companies like BHEL or others also operate. So all the critical parts, pressure parts, will be manufactured here. And lastly, our strategy was to ensure the timely supplies of the boiler for our, especially the Salboni plant, which we have PPA, which we have signed. So it is the technology is there, the skill set to do the people are there, the engineering team is there. So these are the prime reasons, strategy reasons that we have gone for this.
Understood, sir. Thank you, all the best. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Sumit Kishore from Axis Capital. Please go ahead.
Good evening. My compliments on a strong operating performance in Q2. My first question is, over the past one year, there have been fairly strong additions to the installed capacity led by solar, as you mentioned in your opening remarks, accompanied with relatively muted power demand growth. So in this backdrop, are you seeing any instances of grid curtailment for RE capacities during solar hours? And is this likely to be a risk for the sector in coming times? That's my first question.
See, Sumit, one is, of course, this phenomenon with this so much of capacity addition, which is happening especially in solar during solar hours, there is a capacity evacuation challenge grid has started facing. But we have to remember what the regulation says, based on the connectivity. One is the T-GNA, which is a temporary connectivity, and one is the GNA. So I think it is, if the scheduling system is proper, agile, vigilant, and the timely scheduling and proper scheduling is happening, this can be minimized or avoided. Till now, at least, we have not faced any such challenge in terms of curtailments, and we will keep.
But yes, this is one phenomenon. A watch needs to be kept, but not, I will say, on a permanent basis, temporarily, maybe for next one year, two year, three year, till the time the new connectivity, the work in progress, which is there, comes, and the evacuation is there. But it is protected in terms of if there is a PPA with an entity, and if the scheduling is within the PPA terms, even if there is a curtailment in the grid, the regulation protects the developers, and they get the money. There is a process, which can be explained by the IR team in case that those details can be shared with you separately.
Okay. So your payments would not be affected as the must-run status of that RE plant would be? Provided the only - sorry, I'll come in here. So just for the sake of clarity, what Sharad was trying to say is, provided your asset is already operating under GNA. GNA. Right? But if there is any asset which is operating under TGNA, if there is a curtailment, there is no revenue protection mechanism, yeah? And your capacities are under GNA?
Yes. Yes.
The second thing is operating capacity. You will typically have TGNA for part commissioning of capacities. So conceptually, the way to understand this is that if, suppose I'm building a 100-megawatt plant, right, and only 30 megawatt or 40 megawatt or 50 megawatt is commissioned, the evacuation of that power is allowed under T-GNA, right? But your project SCOD will only be achieved when the entire 100 megawatt is completed. Once the 100 megawatt achieves SCOD, you move to GNA. The T-GNA goes away. And that is when your, so to say, the meter of counting your 25-year PPA starts, right? So effectively, under T-GNA, one was earning excess revenues even before the start of the PPA. So there is no compensation mechanism for that, right? I hope that is clear.
Yeah, that is very clear.
My second question is, in the first half of the fiscal, you have added more than one gigawatt of organic capacity addition, and you had talked about a 3-4 gigawatt addition target on an organic basis in FY26. You have also shown photographs in your presentation of 3.4 gigawatt solar, 2.3 gigawatt wind, which is under construction at various sites. So, I mean, are there any impediments to achieving this target? Because when I see your CapEx incurred in the first half, it seems that there should be a decent pickup in the second half if you are to achieve these targets. I mean, how should we think about CapEx and your capacity addition?
So, Sumit, one is, of course, whatever the project work in progress is there, there are no impediments to complete and commission this because connectivity, land, which are the two major challenges in execution, all are well in place. Then only the work on the projects have started. And, of course, in terms of we normally see lesser lower activity, and especially in the current year in the first half with the extended monsoons, the project pace, execution pace was much slower. And now, in the second half of the year, the projects want the capacity, which, as I've indicated also, that in excess of 15 gigawatt will be closing the year.
So maybe close to about 2 gigawatt further is to be added. So definitely, in terms of CapEx also, as compared to what has been witnessed in H1, it will be more than that.
Okay. That is very clear. I join the, thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ketan Jain from Avendus Spark. Please go ahead.
Hello. Hi. Good evening, sir. Thank you for the opportunity. My first question is on the Karnataka LOA for Ind-Barath. What would be the terms of realization for this, or was it a competitive bid, and how was the tariff decided for this LOA?
See, this tariff, again, this is a bidding, and this is in public domain. The tariff for this is at the regional periphery at CTU. You can say at plant periphery. It is INR 5.78 is the tariff. Understood. For this. So you can do the calculations in terms of the fuel cost. Our Ind-Barath plant, Utkal plant, is very close to the mine. MCL, it is just a few kilometers only from there, from where we are getting bulk of the fuel. So it is quite attractive pricing.
Understood. Also, I just wanted to check, did we have any one-off in our renewable EBITDA from either of the sector projects, or is it all of the organic EBITDA?
Yeah, hopefully organic. Yes, yes, yes, yes. No, nothing one-off significant, anything to be reported. Nothing.
Understood. Thank you. I'll come back to my other questions and answer.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Atul Tiwari from JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
Yes, sir. Thanks a lot. So my first question is an industry-level question. So we have just seen five gigawatts of RE builds in the first half. And obviously, we have been hearing about news of curtailment, etc., and slow power demand is now a reality. So do you think that this is the new normal, like five, 10 gigawatt more in the second half, or can we still achieve the ambitious target of 40, 50 gigawatt RE bidding on an annual basis?
See, it's a very, I will say, a very, very pertinent question which is being sent. We have to understand two things. I don't see this is very, very temporary. I am seeing two things which have been witnessed is what we have seen in the last two years, the amount of bidding which is close to 100 gigawatt which has happened. So the pile-up, close to 40 gigawatt of bids for which the PPAs are still pending, and in which there are significant portions of plain solar and plain wind also, with the grid challenges which are being faced, we have seen one big significant change in the current year H1 is that plain vanilla solar or vanilla wind bids are hardly any.
They're not there. More it is coming is either hybrid. Hybrid also is much lesser. It is FDRE or other majority is solar plus battery energy storage to discharge during the evening hours. So we are seeing this temporarily to hold on because there is enough in the country to be executed going forward in the next three years, the PPAs which have been signed or the unsigned bids which are there. So we see that current year we expect the overall bidding volume what we have witnessed in the last two fiscals is expected to be lower in the current year. But as I again said, this is temporary.
Again, once the backlog starts coming down and the connectivity visibility is there, I think this will again face maybe from next financial year is what is expected. Okay. And my second question is on Salboni project. So fair to assume now that the boiler will be done in-house with the acquisition of GE Power boiler assets, right? Yes. Yes. Okay. And just to kind of obviously, you will be hopefully bidding for new coal-based capacity as well. So what is the maximum capacity of boilers you can do in-house in this facility? See, as I said that clearly, when you see that the boiler plant doesn't work that we say that, okay, two or one boiler.
It's not that it is one. It is a single unit, and it delivers one in a year. See, this has a capacity of almost 1.5 boiler worth of component manufacturing. And it doesn't mean that it will give 1.5 in one year. It is a span to complete one boiler is almost 18 months in terms of supplies from the zero date. So it is a cycle which is there, and we have time. It is meeting the timelines. My commissionings are in 2030 as per the PPA terms in Salboni. So effectively, you can say once the plant is fully functional, it will give a material worth 1.5 boilers, you can say, per annum this will be giving.
Okay. And so the turbine generator will be with JSW Toshiba for the plant. We have a joint venture with Toshiba, which is an old joint venture, and they have already made and supplied this 800-megawatt TG in India beforehand also to NTPC and others.
So yes, the turbine generator will be from Toshiba JSW, the joint venture company.
And so what is the annual capacity of JSW Toshiba as of now?
JSW Toshiba can produce comfortably two turbine generators in a year.
That is about 600 megawatts.
Again, as I said, because last few years, they have not been producing turbine generators, though the technology equipment is there with them. The start year to deliver will be three years from now, which again matches absolutely with our schedule. And then after that, from third year onward, once they deliver the first, every year they can deliver two TGs.
Two TGs of 800 megawatts each?
800 megawatts, which means 1.66 gigawatt every year with a potential to go to 2.4 also.
Okay. Okay. Good to know. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Karan Gupta from Karma Capital. Please go ahead.
Yes, sir. Thank you for the opportunity and sending these greetings to everyone. Two quick questions. Can you just talk about the alignment of the depreciation expense that is booked and the economic life of the underlying assets? So in other words, can these assets continue to generate cash flows even after they're depreciated to zero? And secondly, you've always spoken about netting ROEs. So are those on a cash basis or a net basis that you're looking at?
Can you repeat the second part of your question, please?
Yeah. So during past calls, also management has always guided that capital allocation decisions are based on netting ROEs. So are those netting ROEs on a cash basis, or are those on a net of depreciation expense?
So the first part of the question is that depreciation is a straight-line method, right? So yes, the economic life of the assets are typically longer than the depreciation with a very big caveat provided your operation and maintenance and upkeep and overhauls are proper, right? So there are a lot of cases in India across different kinds of asset bases where the asset life with some nominal RNM, which is renovation and modernization CapEx, can be elongated. The economic life can be elongated beyond the depreciation, right? So that's the first part of the question. The second part of the question is the capital allocation decision does not change.
It is a levered equity IRR, right? Because we are allocating capital for the cash flows for the life of the asset, right? And therefore, when you're talking about a levered equity IRR, you will be able to do when you do the FC calculation, you will be able to arrive at that, right? So ROE is, I think, easily understood. It's more backward-looking or at a certain point of time. But given where you are in the stage of your Capex cycle or where you are in the life of the asset, your ROE trajectory typically for an RE business, for example, in the initial years will be lower because the debt is still to be repaid.
And typically, once you hit the 10, 11, 12-year mark is when the debt is getting paid faster than so the accrual at the numerator, which is your reported profit after tax, is higher, right? So the ROE starts bunching up in the back end of the economic life of the asset. Whereas capital allocation decisions are on a long-term cash flow forecasting. So it's a netting equity IRR on a levered basis. I hope I'm clear.
Yes. Really appreciate that. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Amit Pandey from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you for the opportunity, sir. I just wanted to understand your thought process on the 1,800 KSK Mahanadi plant. Would that be operationalized by 2031?
Sorry to interrupt. Amit sir, may we request you please repeat your question once again? Apologies for the static.
Yes, sure. Sir, I wanted to understand whether we'll be aiming to start the remaining 1,800 megawatts of KSK Mahanadi by 2031. Would that be in your plan?
See, yes, we have been maintaining that this is a 1,800 megawatt operational plant and 1,800 megawatt of which the balance of plant is fully ready and maybe the fourth unit, 40% of the work is complete and also six units of minor work has already been completed. So definitely, we have plans to complete this before 2031.
Right. Okay. Right. Got it, sir. Yeah, that was my question. Remaining questions have been answered. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Shrinidhi Karlekar from ASK Investment Managers Private Limited. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thank you for the opportunity. Sir, I wanted your perspective on what is really driving uptake on state PPAs from various different states and how is the pipeline looking like?
See, state PPAs, if you see one thing what we have witnessed in some of the states is in thermal space, states are looking for signing PPAs for fresh capacities in thermal space and giving a preference of setting up the plant within the state. Promoting, encouraging investment and employment in the state is one of the strategic shifts which we are seeing in the states, whether in the recent bids if we see whether it is in the state of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, or West Bengal, or even the recent bid in Assam or in UP. These are the five major states and Maharashtra, six.
This we've seen the state, barring Maharashtra. Every state has asked for the setting up the unit in the respective state only, which in a way we feel is good in terms of grid challenges what we are witnessing till the time and this will support. This is what we are witnessing, that states are encouraging this. In RE space also, for two reasons which are driving some of the states which are friendly in terms of setting up solar or wind capacities, wherein Karnataka is one of the leaders and Maharashtra, that setting up within the same state, it insulates them from the ISTS connectivity, which is a challenge, and also the obligations in terms of the connectivity charges, which have been free, which we have started implementing in the current year from first June.
Every year, there will be incremental transmission charges. So these two factors are driving in the states which are RE-friendly to set up the capacities within the state.
Right. And sir, is the pipeline still strong or it was just a patch of a year or two where we saw a lot of bids in terms of thermal PPAs?
So if I can come in here, see, typically the way it works is you have to look at it from a procurer's point of view, right? So every distribution utility does what is called their demand curve forecasting, right? And then commensurate with their demand curve forecasting, which is typically on a medium to long period average basis, they will do a resource adequacy plan that, where will this curve, what different modes of generation will it be met with, right? And then, based on their internal analysis and decisions, they decided, okay, X% from this mode and Y% from that mode and all that.
And that is how then, what is the typical gestation period for each of the mode, and then that is how they do it, right? So in the last 18 months, most of us who have been in the power market have been surprised with the greenfield long-term PPAs for thermal projects, those bids coming back. So clearly, you are now asking us to crystal ball will this trend continue or not. We have a very poor track record of calling something like this out. We would not trust our views on this, right, on the light or not. But I would believe that the pace at which we've seen the bids, so at least it is less likely that the current states should call for the states which have already done a bid, maybe some brownfield or some additional from those, but the states which have not may come back one year or two years from now, right? So there is no visibility.
Nobody gives out these kind of guidances, right? You play it by the year. That is how it works.
Right. Understood. Quite clear. And one last one, if I may. So you're putting up this BESS assembly plant in Pune. Wondering, is it for largely captive needs or you plan to service external demand as well?
See, our captive portfolio is also significant. It is for captive, but the kind of capacity which we have put a 5 gigawatt hour per annum, and it takes time to ramp up this capacity. Maybe by second year of operation, we should be reaching the full capacity. So we'll be open too because the way MNRE has been focusing in terms of ALMM for solar modules and then cells also, which is in discussion, and also for wind also, which is there. So ultimately, there is a focus for Make in India, even in this area. So we feel that there will be opportunities even to cater to the requirements of outside also.
So we'll be open to both for our captive technically and also if there is any requirement, then we can cater to the outside requirements.
Understood, sir. Thank you for answering my questions and all the very best.
Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Darshan from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Hi, sir. Congratulations on good set of numbers. Just wanted a small clarification. If we look at the page 35 of our presentation, the utilization for solar and wind is 19% and 41% respectively. However, it was the same for 2Q FY25.
Sorry, what's the question?
Am I audible?
Yes, yes, yes. What was your question?
So if you look at the CUF for solar and wind, for 2Q FY26, it's 19% and 41% versus 24% and 26% as mentioned in this PPT. But if you look at the 2Q FY26.
No, no. You're mixing the rows. 99% and 91% is the total of hydro. Solar is 24% versus 99%. And wind is 26% versus 41%. Yeah. So basically, what you like you are asking for, you want to understand the change which is there over last year quarter two?
No, sir. For the current quarter, it's 19 and 41, right? Solar and wind?
Yes, yes.
All right. Because if I look at the last year quarter two presentation,
it was 24 and 26.
Okay. Okay. No problem. Thanks.
Yeah. It is there.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Aniket Mittal from SBI Mutual Fund. Please go ahead.
Yes, sir. Thank you for the opportunity. Two small questions. One is while we see the recovery in wind PLFs, if I look at the EBITDA number for Mytrah, it's actually fallen on a YY basis. Given that Mytrah is a fairly wind-heavy portfolio, I just wanted to understand the reason for that.
Can you repeat? Mytrah, you say that despite the increase in the PLF?
So wind PLFs are higher. Mytrah is a wind-heavy portfolio, but the EBITDA number on a YY basis is actually showing a decline in. How much?
Yeah. By how much?
I think it's slightly down, down over 51 crores, 50 crores.
I'll tell you, five crores. See, wind speed is better. We have to understand the Mytrah portfolio by design. It's an old portfolio which has machines starting from 850 kilowatt. So even with the higher wind speed, they have also demonstrated wind portfolio has performed better. But the amount of benefit of a higher wind speed and what we get in larger machines, whether it is 2.7 or 3 gigawatt, as compared to that, the incremental EBITDA from wind portfolio in Mytrah is limited. But solar, we understand that solar, because of the extended monsoon, the solar skew in general has been lower.
But if you see H1, H1 EBITDA of Mytrah, if you compare over H1 of last year, when H1 solar was performing well, is 1,021 as compared to 892 last year. Right. Right. So we did see a very marginal, and it is primarily, though solar is only 422 megawatt, it is wind-dominated, but the impact of solar because of the lower radiations and the extended monsoons, solar in general in the country has not performed well in this quarter. So that impact is only this minor change in quarter.
Got it. And just on Barmer, right? The sharp fall in EBITDA in Barmer on a YY basis.
So Barmer, if you recall, Aniket, the same thing was happening last year with hydro. In regulated return businesses, at the end of 12 years, your rate of depreciation changes, and correspondingly, your capacity charge goes down, right? Because debt repayments have happened and all that, right? So Barmer completed its 12 years last year. So this year onwards, there's a step down under the regulatory trajectory of the capacity charge recovery because of the change in the rate of depreciation. You would have seen this in Q1 also compared to Q1 of last year, right?
So this will happen in all four quarters of this year, and then this becomes the base for the next year onwards, right?
Yeah. Understood. I think the difference in one Q was slightly lower than this, and that's why I understand.
No, so there would be backgrounds. There would be PLF changes. There would be impact of station heat rates, SOX consumption, all of that. Those plus minuses will happen. But fundamentally, the step change is because of this. Yeah?
Got it. Those are my questions. Thank you.
Yeah.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mithil Jain from CRISIL. Please go ahead.
Hi, sir. Thank you for the opportunity, and a happy Diwali to everyone. My question is with regards to unit economics for battery energy storage system. There's a point number one. What is the current CapEx per megawatt hour in BESS? So since we have read in multiple media articles that it has come down from 105 kilowatt hour to 55 kilowatt hour. So what is the current cost which we are incurring in India, the landed cost for one megawatt hour of BESS? And the second question is with regard to the tariff which we charge for our standalone BESS and storage plus solar tariffs. Thank you.
So I am struggling how to respond to this because when there is a sourcing or a procurement decision, a lot also depends on A, what is the prevailing price at that point of time? What is your negotiating strategy vis-à-vis multiple suppliers? What kind of framework agreements, if at all, or volume commitments, if at all, you can give? And hence, every player's negotiation ability will be very different. I'm afraid there is no one-size-fits-all. Yeah. And also, we have to understand that when you are asking for in terms of when the BESS supply and also in terms of BESS project, saying that this is the standard tariff is not possible because solar plus BESS, which geography it is being put, whether it is a two-hour discharge or a four-hour single discharge or two-hour discharge morning and two-hour evening.
So the project is to be designed, the battery container solution is to be designed that way. Apart from that, my energy plant, at what price I'm procuring this LPAC? So there are a lot many factors. So maybe saying that 110 to 55 or giving any straight line number will not be possible. There are many variables which need to be closed before arriving at a number. And just to complete the second part of the question, it's a competitive bidding process, right? So it is like they say, beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. So I'm sure the prices that are being discovered for the standalone battery energy storage systems where we are now seeing 15, 20, 25 bidders in a single auction, I'm sure for some of those players, those numbers are making sense, right?
So that number is publicly known, so you know what it is, right? But it also depends on the risk appetite and the returns. And just to end with what Pritesh said, that we have been maintaining from the very beginning and is still maintaining very clear our benchmark hurdle rate any bid if it is not giving. We are just for the sake of building a portfolio, we are not going to build a portfolio mid- to high-teens IRR is our hurdle rate that has to be maintained, then only we go ahead.
Yeah. Okay. So just one thing, if you can give us just upper and lower band of the Capex per megawatt hour, so because we needed to check whether now whether the tariffs for BESS have been lower than PSP or it is still in the similar ranges or PSP is a little cheaper than BESS. So broadly, your view on this?
No, I'm sorry, we will not be able to do that here. It's a competitive market. And it is not in our interest to speak publicly about these things. Yeah. But what I will suggest is in case you need any discussion, any more information, you can approach our IR team. They will definitely be happy to provide whatever more information or any guidance which needs to be given.
Sure, sure, sure. Thank you.
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Mahesh Patil from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah, hi sir. So my question is on our renewable LOA. So out of the 2.6 gigawatt that is still pending for PPA, can we expect over the next six months, that is by the end of this year, we'll be able to sign those PPAs? How do you see that?
\See, the thing is, as we discussed some time back also, and I replied to one of the questions, that there is a pendency of 40 gigawatt of bids which LOA issued and PPA pending for signing. So we are not, we cannot give any timeline for this, whether it is three months, six months, one year. We are just waiting for the right time if the opportunity comes. But without that also, we are well on track of our reaching the 30 gigawatt capacity. We are absolutely confident. So we don't see, and for us, it is the total capacity for which we have received pure solar, which we see as a challenge, is only 900 megawatt out of our total four gigawatts which is there, which is a mix of many.
But total solar, if you see, is 900 megawatt of capacity which is pending, which is contracted and not signed.
Okay, sir. But have you seen the situation, the overall scenario here? Any improvement in that compared to last quarter?
Sorry, can you repeat that question?
Sir, I was asking, have you seen any improvement in the overall scenario, the situation that was with regards to DISCOMs and PPAs signing last quarter? Have you seen any improvement over the last four, five months?
We are not seeing any specific improvement. It is the same what has been observed in the last six months' slowdown in signing of PPAs. Thermal, there is an uptick we all are seeing, and also there is more keenness on solar plus battery energy storage, both in the C&I segment as well as in the utility scale.
Okay, sir. Got it. Thank you. Thank you so much.
Operator, that was the time we had. If we can wrap it up, please.
Certainly, sir. We will take that as a last question for today. I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments.
Yeah. Yeah. Thank you, everyone, for being with us today. And from our side, from JSW Energy side, I wish you and all your family members and close ones a very, very happy and prosperous Deepavali and New Year. And thank you once again for being with us.
Thank you. On behalf of Motilal Oswal, that concludes this conference. Thank you all for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.