Hello, everyone, and welcome to Azul's third quarter 2019 results conference call. My name is Beatrice, and I will be your operator for today. This event is being recorded, and all participants will be in a listen-only mode until we conduct a question and answer session following the company's presentation. Should any participant need assistance during this call, please press star zero to reach the operator. I would like to turn the presentation over to Andrea Bottcher, investor relations manager. Please proceed.
Thank you, Beatrice, and welcome all to Azul's third quarter earnings call. The results that we announced this morning, the audio of this call, and the slides that we reference are available on our IR website. Presenting today will be David Neeleman, Azul's Founder and Chairman, and John Rodgerson, CEO. Alex Malfitani, our CFO, and Abhi Shah, our Chief Revenue Officer, are also here for the Q&A session. Before I turn the call over to David, I'd like to caution you regarding our forward-looking statements. Any matters discussed today that are not historical facts, particularly comments regarding the company's future plans, objectives, and expected performance, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are based on a range of assumptions that the company believes are reasonable, are subject to uncertainties and risks that are discussed in detail in our CVM and SEC filings.
During the course of the call, we will discuss non-IFRS performance measures, which should not be considered in isolation. With that, I'll turn the call over to David. David?
Thanks, Andrea. Welcome, everyone, and thanks for joining us on our third quarter 2019 earnings call. As always, I would like to start by congratulating our crew members and thanking them for another great quarter. We certainly couldn't do it without them. Thanks to their efforts, we continue to deliver on our IPO promise of expanding margins. What we didn't highlight enough at the time of the IPO is that in addition to expanding margins, we have also increased revenue by more than 70% since the time of the IPO. This year alone, revenue should increase by more than 25% compared to last year. The combination of expanding margins and a growing revenue base has led to an EBITDA more than double since our IPO in 2016. That's incredible. Like I said, we always try to expand margins.
I guess we forgot to tell you that part, we were going to grow. The bottom line is really growing. More importantly, we have demonstrated our ability to grow while maintaining our operational excellence and great customer service. This quarter, for the third year in a row, readers of Melhores Destinos, one of Brazil's largest travel sites, elected Azul as the best airline in the country and TudoAzul as the best loyalty program, a true testament to our commitment to customer satisfaction. We're also proud to be ranked number one in all categories by [Inaudible] , a customer satisfaction website, including best airline, best loyalty program, and best travel package program. What I'm most excited about this quarter was the delivery of our very first E2. We've been talking about that for a while. The first one's finally here.
We have another 50-plus on order to be delivered over the next few years. The E2s, as we've been telling you, have a lower trip cost that is 14% lower than the E1s. We're actually getting better fuel performance than we even anticipated. It comes with 18 additional seats. Lower trip cost, 18 additional seats. That's nirvana for the airline business. It also gives us flexibility to connect dots that have never been connected before in Brazil. These are long, thin routes that, like I said, have never been flown before. Just tons of flexibility. We can also add additional frequencies in our business markets. Very exciting airplane. By the end of 2020, we should have 76 next-generation aircraft in our fleet, including A320neos and the E2s, representing 61% of our ASKs.
As we have been telling the market, with the addition of the E2s and the A320neos, we will continue to reduce unit costs while producing more revenue per aircraft. As you can see on slide four, we still have a long way to go in our margin expansion story. The best news is that we are less than halfway completed. As I just mentioned, we have just started switching E1s with E2s in October, and we have roughly 500 flights a day to replace. We're also thrilled with the growth of our business units, Azul Cargo, TudoAzul, both which grew more than 40% in the quarter. On slide five, you will see our latest network. We now fly to 114 destinations, incredible, and have more than 900 daily flights.
I've asked Abhi when we're going to hit that 1,000th flight, and he guarantees me it's coming up in the not-too-distant future. In Q3, we also started flying the air bridge between São Paulo and Rio with 14 daily frequencies. This is the fourth largest market in the world and the largest in the Americas in terms of passengers. We are very pleased with the results we are seeing on this route. In summary, we continue to deliver on our promises of expanding margins while growing our top line by double digits. Our network is as strong as it has ever been, and I couldn't be more excited about the opportunities that lie ahead of us as we continue to benefit from our fleet transformation. I'm certain that it will create great value for our shareholders, crew members, and customers.
With that, I'll turn the time over to John to give you more details on the quarter.
Thanks, David. I also want to thank our crew members for all their hard work during the past quarter. Thanks to them, we continue to deliver great results. As you can see on slide six, we grew our top-line revenue by 25% to over BRL 3 billion in the quarter, and also expanding EBIT margin to 18.5%.
EBITDA reached a record BRL 936 million, up 24% year-over-year. RASK, on a passenger adjusted basis, increased 1.7%, while CASK decreased 1.5%. Excluding the impact at the end of the payroll tax relief program, CASK would have fallen 4%. We had net income of BRL 441 million, up 57% year-over-year, if you remove the non-cash impact of currency variation. Moving on to slide seven, our cargo business maintained a strong growth, with revenue increasing 42% year-over-year, benefiting from the expansion of our network and fleet. In August, we signed a commercial agreement with Mercado Libre, Latin America's largest e-commerce player, becoming their exclusive direct provider of air shipments for e-commerce in Brazil. Through this partnership, Mercado Libre will have the fastest shipping times of any e-commerce player, reaching more than 3,700 municipalities nationwide, with the support of our extensive network.
E-commerce represented almost 20% of Azul Cargo revenue in 3Q 2019, up from 9% in the same period last year. In addition to the growth in e-commerce, we're also growing our corporate customer base, reaching a domestic cargo market share of 22%, the second highest in Brazil. TudoAzul also had a great performance during the quarter, with gross billings ex Azul increasing 40% year-over-year. This is TudoAzul's fourth consecutive year with over 30% growth. As David highlighted, it is once again elected the best loyalty program in Brazil. Congratulations to the entire TudoAzul team for their great work. Moving on to slide eight, I'm proud to report that we ended the quarter with a strong liquidity position, representing 41% of our last 12 months revenue, and this is while growing revenue by 25% year-over-year.
Our balance sheet is further protected against currency fluctuations through our assets, such as our security deposits and maintenance reserves, totaling $1.6 billion. These are not included in our cash balance. On the right side of the slide, we show an evolution of our leverage, which reached 3.3 in July. With the new accounting standard, when a new aircraft arrives, we immediately see an increase in debt, reflecting the full term of the lease without the benefits of the EBITDA these aircraft will produce. Adjusting for these five aircraft that we added during the quarter, our leverage would have been three. We expect this timing effect to level off as these aircraft become fully productive.
On slide nine, you can see that in addition to the improvement of our operating results and solid balance sheet, our operating cash flow was almost BRL 1 billion, and we generated free cash flow of BRL 187 million in the quarter. Moving on to slide nine, we wanted to highlight the significant investments we're making in our future, adding new aircraft, hiring pilots and flight attendants. We added 14 aircraft year to date, including five planes in the third quarter. In Q4, we expect to add 12 next-generation aircraft. We also elected to convert some of our prior A320 orders to A321s, allowing us to further upgauge our fleet in a margin-accretive way. Next week, we will receive our first A321neo, and we plan to receive a total of 12 by 2022.
As you know, we've been actively marketing the E1s to accelerate our transition into an all next-generation fleet. We sold one E1 in the third quarter and also sold one in the fourth quarter. We're happy to share with you that we've recently signed an MOU with an airline for the sublease of up to 32 E1s over the next few years. The E195 served their purpose at Azul, but once new technology came out, it's important we transition as quickly as possible. Consistent with our aircraft sales, the sublease will most likely result in a non-cash one-time book loss in the fourth quarter. We will finalize the exact amounts over the coming weeks, and we'll update you as soon as the number is final. Also consistent with the aircraft sales, given the great economics of the next generation aircraft, this transaction is cash positive and margin accretive.
We also invested in the construction of a new hangar, one of the largest and most modern in Latin America. The facility accommodates up to 8 A320neos or 2 A330s and will help reduce our maintenance costs as we'll be insourcing all of our narrow-body C checks. We're also excited with our investment in TAP as it continues to make progress on its own fleet transformation plan. The recent consolidation events in Europe further reinforce the value of our investment, given TAP's strategic location and leadership position in traffic between Brazil and Europe. Today, we've submitted for shareholders approval a proposal for our commercial joint venture with TAP, which we believe will be revenue accretive for both carriers in the coming years. Wrapping up on slide 12, we present our updated 2019 outlook.
We expect our capacity to grow approximately 20% through 2019 and remain confident on the expected operating margin for the year of around 18%. In summary, we are building the best airline for our crew members, customers, and shareholders. This is a multi-year margin expansion story. I'm excited with what the company will look like one year from now, three years from now, and even five years from now, as we continue to build and invest in the best airline in the world. Just keep in mind, we still have 500 daily flights being flown by E1s. Finally, I would like to thank our shareholders for their continued support. We will work to keep your confidence and expect to continue making progress on growing our business profitably. With that, David, myself, and Abhi and Alex are here to answer any of your questions. Let me turn it over to the operator.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you have a question, please press the star key followed by the 1 key on your touch tone phone now. If at any time you would like to remove yourself from the questioning queue, press star 2. For those following the call via webcast, you may post your questions on the platform, and they will be either answered during this call or by the Azul investor relations team after the conference finished. Our first question comes from Savi Syth, Raymond James.
Hey. Good afternoon, everyone. The capacity for 2019 coming at the towards the lower end, I was curious if that's a function of aircraft timing or if you're just reacting to the environment. It seems to imply maybe a bit of a moderation in the fourth quarter. Should 4Q RASK be at a similar level to what you're seeing in 3Q? Thanks.
Hey, Savi. I'll answer the first part and then pass it over to Abhi. Airbus as well as Embraer has experienced some delivery delays from what they originally gave to us. That's primarily the difference in capacity as we look in the fourth quarter. Airbus has not yet caught up, and even Embraer has been delayed a bit on some deliveries. That's really what the difference is from what we had previously forecasted.
Hey, Savi. Abhi here. Yeah. We had the deliveries that John talked about. We also have a couple of Embraers starting to exit the fleet for the exit process. That's happening in 4Q. It was mostly fleet-related, some exits, two aircraft exiting the fleet to begin the exit process, and the new airplanes coming in with the dates sliding around. There also is a minor impact with the timing of the November holiday. The holiday is on a Wednesday. We've made adjustments around that. It's mostly fleet stuff in terms of why the ASK guidance has come down to the lower end. In terms of unit revenues for 4Q, yeah, I expect them to be close to zero again. Keep in mind, we have two very strong effects when it comes to year-over-year RASK.
The first one is you have a very high base from last year. Last year, every month, August, September, October, November, were all record months for Azul in terms of our RASK. It was a very high base that we're trying to get even higher this year. We have the impact of the aircraft mix that we talked about at Azul Day. Just the fact that our A320s now represent so much more of our network than they did last year. They give up about 100% in capacity year-over-year. They fly double the stage length, and they're 50% bigger. This effect is not really included in the stage length adjustment. The fact that they fly much longer, they're much bigger, on absolute terms, they have a lower RASK. The mathematical effect of the aircraft mix is a 7 to 8-point system-wide RASK impact.
I think in 4Q, we'll be again RASKs very close to zero as well. In actuality, we're actually up 7-8 points because we're making up for the effect of the aircraft mix. Hopefully that answers the question.
That makes sense. Helpful. Just given the new E1 announcement, any color on how we should think about growth next year? Is that still pretty consistent, or should we think about slower or faster growth next year?
Yeah, I think you can expect growth for next year very consistent to what you have this year. It's going to bias more towards the E2s. Obviously, this year was more towards the E1s. Because the E1s are primarily in our network, in our hubs, in our corporate markets, the swapping out of the E1 to E2s is going to be focused in our network, in our largest corporate markets, where we have nine, 10, 11 flights a day out of Campinas, out of Belo Horizonte, out of Recife. The focus next year is going to be E2s. The ASK number is going to be similar to what we have this year, and it's going to be just focused on swapping E1s for E2s.
All right. Thank you.
Our next question comes from Mike Linenberg, Deutsche Bank.
Oh, hey, just a few housekeeping questions and then a bigger picture question. The A321neos, how many seats are they going to have?
Hey, Mike. Abhi here. A321s have 214. 2-1-4.
Okay, 214. Okay, great. That's also going to include your exit extra room up front type product that you have on the.
Yeah.
Okay, great.
Yeah. It's a domestic A321 with extra legroom up front.
Okay, great. Just a quick second here. I saw that you were reporting earnings per ADR, and I know in the past, I think it was per ADS. Did you have any sort of legal change on the share structure? I realize this is kind of minor.
No, we use those interchangeably, ADRs and ADS. There is no difference.
Okay, great. Alex, actually, since you answered that, a quick question just on the accounting. The difference between your reported loss and then you had net income as adjusted, you added back the foreign currency exchange hit. Are there any tax implications, though, as a result of adding that back? Is that just a straight add back, or should we assume, apply some sort of tax rate to getting to a true after-tax number? Maybe it's not even applicable. You wouldn't even apply taxes to that.
Yeah, no, it's a pretty straight add back of the impact of FX to our dollar-denominated debt, which isn't real debt, as you know, these days, Mike. It's mainly the capitalized leases, right? Unfortunately with IFRS 16, the volatility to earnings with FX are going to increase because all of those lease cash flows.
Get capitalized on a balance sheet, and they get translated to reais every quarter.
Yeah
based on the foreign effect. When you calculate taxable income, that FX volatility does not apply, right? For taxable income, the revenue service already kind of disregards the FX volatility, and so you don't need to worry about tax impact when you add it back to net income.
Okay, great. That's helpful. Just lastly, maybe this is more of a question to David. You referenced recent consolidation in Europe. We now have another marker out there for a carrier, which in this case, it is a carrier that had a decent presence between Latin America and Europe. Yet when I look at the numbers, I believe TAP is actually a larger carrier, maybe a point or two of share larger than Air Europa. Just thoughts about that transaction and how you think about it vis-a-vis TAP.
Absolutely. I think Air Europa is maybe a little bit stronger in the rest of Latin America, and TAP's really strong in Brazil.
If you were to take what we have scheduled for next year between this JV between TAP and Azul, there's 100 weekly departures going to Europe from Brazil, which is far and away the largest carrier. We have about 30% of all of the passengers that fly between Brazil and Europe, which is quite amazing. Nobody even comes close to that, including Air Europa, if you even added them to IAG. No, I think it's great. Air Europa has sales of BRL 2.1 billion. That's what I read. TAP this year is going to be close to BRL 3.5 billion.
Oh, wow.
We're significantly bigger. The price that was paid, there's not equivalency. Maybe the debt's a little bit different or something, but it certainly was encouraging for us. We thought it was a great transaction and interesting, the antitrust implications of that, with both the carriers being in Madrid. Obviously, they feel confident that that's going to be approved. Certainly makes our investment more valuable, no doubt about it. We're pretty excited about it.
Yeah, no, absolutely. It is great to see another marker in the marketplace. Good job this quarter, everyone. Thank you.
Thanks, Mike. Just remind everybody that if you were to take the shares that Azul owns, the convertible and all that, it's about 48% of TAP. It's a significant amount, by far away the largest shareholder. When you tackle those numbers, you can take about half of that, and that's what Azul's value in TAP shares.
Our next question comes from Dan McKenzie, Buckingham Research.
Well, hey, thanks. Abhi, I wonder if you could talk about the velocity demand that you've seen over the past couple of months. What I'm getting at is we've had some pretty big developments in Brazil, including the passage of pension reform, and it seems the privatization of state-owned companies has picked up here. I'm just wondering, what does that all mean for Azul? Are you seeing a more confident consumer or a less confident consumer? I'm just wondering how that all filters down to Azul.
Yeah. Hey, Dan. Yeah, we felt pretty good about demand. Obviously, we reported our October traffic yesterday. It was very strong. Strong internationally and very, very strong domestically. I think the industry is feeling pretty good about it overall. Combining that with good capacity discipline, good fare discipline as well. Not seeing too many strange things or aggressive things on the corporate discounts and the private fares and all those kinds of games. Yeah, I think that the corporate demand has been good the second half of the year. We're expecting now October was pretty good. October last year had elections, so we actually had a good comp as well for October. November, we have a very difficult comp, but November has started out well also.
Certainly, I think on the domestic front, we're seeing strong numbers, and I think the numbers you will see from our friends in the domestic market are going to be good as well. Certainly reasons to be optimistic here on the domestic side.
Dan, just to highlight, this pension reform is a big deal for Brazil, and the states will be included soon. One thing that we saw is we saw Brazilians going to the streets asking for pension reform. That's unheard of in Latin America and people pushing for it. I think there's a newfound optimism in the country. I think the economic team and the ministers that are in place right now are doing all the right things for Brazil is headed very much in the right direction. The fact that we're seeing this demand and our flights being full and able to add this capacity before Brazil takes off, right? We believe that Brazil will start to grow again over the next couple of years, we're really poised to take advantage of that growth.
Just to reiterate, Dan, this was our second-best-ever third quarter RASK in the history of Azul, and we just missed it by 0.5%. On by far our largest ever ASKs. That gives you an idea of the demand is there for this capacity.
Yes. Yeah. Just to follow up here on the cost side. Alex, I wonder if you can just clarify the pressure, the FX pressure that put on CASK ex fuel. If we could just look at cost or CASK excluding fuel on an FX neutral basis, what would that have looked like in the third quarter?
It was a unique quarter, Dan, in which the average FX rate was fairly flat year-over-year. The final FX rate, the end of quarter FX rate was pretty big year-over-year and also quarter-over-quarter, right? For operating expense, the average FX rate is more of a good indicator as to how our expenses are affected by FX. Year-over-year, I don't think FX is as big of either a headwind or a tailwind for operating expense. There was some help from oil prices, right? Fuel prices in dollars were down, and that helped. Even if you adjust for FX, which didn't have a lot of effect, fuel and the payroll tax, we did see a decrease in CASK, what we call normalized CASK, normalized for these kind of out of our control factors.
Our CASK would have gone down by about a point and a half, right? Which is just the natural result that you would expect from our up gauging, right? The fact that we're bringing in aircraft that has essentially the same trip costs or lower trip costs, but a lot more seats, right? Which naturally reduce CASK, right? I think this quarter, we didn't talk too much about the normalized CASK because the normalized CASK, which we always point to try to control for all these macro factors, was pretty similar to the accounting CASK, right? One, one and a half % reduction, I think that tells the story of what's happening with our operating expense.
That's right. If I could just squeeze in one last one here. The 500 departures with the E1s, it would be helpful to know what % of the revenue or the flying that is. Because the way to think about that obviously is, you got a chunk of revenue. I don't know if that's 20%, 10%, or 30%, where you're going to see margins improve. I think if you can help size the part of that margin improvement story, that would be helpful. Anything you can share there?
Dan, I'll get back to you on the exact number, these departures are in our hubs. In Viracopos, for example, we fly 11 times a day to Curitiba or 10 times a day to Porto Alegre, and things like that. In Belo Horizonte, in Recife, in Cuiabá. A lot of big corporate markets that have higher than average yields, higher than average RASKs. It would be a higher than average for sure revenue representation than just what the ASKs are. These are our highest yielding corporate markets with the high frequencies. I don't have the exact number, it'll be a higher representation in terms of revenue than it is in terms of our ASK. It's going to be very significant when it comes down to our bottom line.
Yeah. Again, just to reemphasize, it's not just the revenue side. Obviously, you're talking about revenue, it's the cost side. If you take 500 flights and you take 15% or so off of that cost of all those 500 flights, that's really significant. Then you add the revenue on top of that because you have 18 more seats. We've got some numbers internally that are pretty eye-popping, and obviously most of the newer flights significantly on our margins, and that's why we're expediting the E1s as quickly as possible and taking delivery of the E2s as quickly as possible, as we've been talking about for a few quarters now. Now we're actually doing it.
Understood. Thanks for the time.
Thank you, Dan.
Our next question comes from Andressa Varotto, UBS.
Hi. Thank you very much for taking my question. I would like to understand better the depreciation decrease quarter-over-quarter. We saw that depreciation decreased at around 5% quarter-over-quarter. At the same time, we have seen increases in PP&E and rent payments. If you could provide some color on that, would be very helpful. I just have one second question regarding the competition outlook on regional routes, especially after the start of operations of Passaredo and MAP. That's it from my end. Thank you.
Great. I'll start with the depreciation, and I'll be able to take the regional routes. Yeah. Depreciation, as you can see, obviously went up year-over-year. Some of it from the fleet transformation, more of it from maintenance. The truth is, it kind of takes a while for new aircraft to really start impacting depreciation significantly. The way IFRS 16 works, you're taking the present value of all the payments that you're going to have over the course of 12 years or 144 months. You're calculating the present value of that using our discount rate, which is higher than the risk-free rate. That gets you a smaller number, you divide that by 144. You can do the math, you'll see that as each aircraft gets added, it doesn't really impact depreciation all that much.
It impacts debt more significantly because the debt takes the full brunt of the present value. Also it affects leverage, as we always talk about, because you get the debt impact on the leverage, but you don't get the EBITDA generation yet, right? That will come over time. You shouldn't expect a huge growth quarter-over-quarter. Certainly not as we're seeing in the growth of ASKs, for example. Like I said, it takes a while for these new aircraft to start impacting depreciation. Also this year, what we did is because we had the change in IFRS, we have all these new aircraft coming in, we made a small change to the timing of when we start recognizing the depreciation of a new aircraft. That change was all
Within the year of 2019. That's why you're seeing Q2 higher than Q3, because we've changed that policy in Q3. What it really means is Q1 was a little bit higher than with this new policy, Q2 a little bit higher than with this new policy, and then we reversed that in Q3, and that's why you see the reduction in Q3 versus Q2. When you look at the full-year number, it's all consistent.
Regarding the question about the regional routes, yeah, we have Passaredo just starting some regional routes out of Congonhas. In terms of our direct overlap with them, we still have very, very little direct overlap with them. I believe maybe one or two routes total. We're not seeing any impact from their flights in our numbers. It represents a very small percentage of our network, and so it's not something that is a big impact that we are seeing, not something we are noticing on a day-to-day basis. We're watching it, but in terms of the impact, we're not seeing anything significant to report or to notice.
I just want to put it in perspective. I think Passaredo has five to six ATRs, and MAP had two to three ATRs. You're talking about in total, seven to nine ATRs, and a lot of them, they've dedicated to the Congonhas Airport to fly the new schedule, exit a lot of routes that MAP was flying in Amazonas. When you fly in Congonhas, it's important for you to keep the schedule there. A lot of the markets that they fly are local markets that we don't compete with them on. Like, for example, Congonhas to Ribeirão Preto, and I think they have direct competition with LATAM on that route, but we don't fly it. Very small airline overall. Even after combining the two airlines, it's very small, and so it's pretty insignificant in the big scheme of things.
I think, keep in mind, we're taking 12 aircraft in the fourth quarter that are three X the size of their largest aircraft. It's pretty small relative to the business that we have.
That's very helpful. Thank you very much.
Our next question comes from Stephen Trent, Citi.
Yes. Hi. It's actually Brian Roberts on for Steve Trent. Thank you for taking the question. If we could go back to your stake in TAP through the converts, is it fair to say that Azul could monetize this holding if approached by a strategic suitor, or if TAP were to decide to IPO?
Of course. Yeah, absolutely own it. We own it as an investment, and we think it certainly is continuing to increase in value. As John mentioned in his script, TAP's undergoing the same kind of fleet transformation that we're doing here. They're replacing their A330-200s for A330neos. They only have 15 they've done this year. They'll exit the year with, like, 75% of their new generation airplanes on the wide body fleet. They're starting the narrow body. They started flying the A321LR. 321 stood for Long Range, but we changed it to Lisbon Range because it works best for Lisbon than the other capital in Europe until the A321XLR comes along. We started flying that to Belém and started flying it to Washington for the off-season. We're seeing expansion on margins with those airplanes.
Things are looking great, TAP, and so we're excited about our investment there. We're also excited about the strategic value of having this joint venture that we announced today that was approved by our board yesterday. There's going to be huge synergies between both of us being able to coordinate schedules and coordinate fares and do all those things. Also it's an investment, and if somebody invests in it or purchases it, we certainly have upside for all of that because of our ownership stake.
Yeah. I think it's important that having the commercial agreement and the joint venture in place means that we can monetize the asset and still have all of the strategic value associated with it. That's why the sequencing is happening as it is. It's very important for us to get the commercial joint venture in place before we talk about a few of the alternatives for liquidity that you address.
Great. Thank you. If we could just switch gears. Given your partnership with [MELI], is it possible that we might see other partnerships with other e-commerce companies like Amazon, et cetera? Thank you.
We're not naming Amazon or any of the other players right now, we are significantly investing in our logistics network in Brazil. Right? We'll continue to invest. A lot of our management time is focused on it, I think you'll hear a lot about this over the coming year or so. We're very excited. It's a new phase in Brazil, the fact that we can deliver packages in 3,700 municipalities in the country is very powerful. Our network is our greatest strength, we're going to leverage that as much as we can in the e-commerce space.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from Josh Milberg, Morgan Stanley.
Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for the call. You guys have already covered a lot of ground today. I wanted to ask about the issue of hidden assets that Alex had touched on at your Investor Day and just the potential for prepaid maintenance expenses to go down longer term.
I think it's maybe not too surprising to see that that line in your balance sheet was up this quarter, but I was just hoping you could give a little more perspective on how it could evolve in the next few years or how we might project that upside. Thanks.
I think the way to project it, Josh, is I think our fleet plan is probably a good proxy because the payment of maintenance reserves is by and large a phenomenon from our old E1 leases. That's why we're confident that they will go down over time because, as the E1s leave, and they will leave, it's just a matter of time, we will see that line going down. The reason why it may go up or down until then is more of a question of the maintenance events that the E1s will go through or not. In some quarters where you have a lot of maintenance events, we may dip into that balance to pay for the maintenance events.
If there's a quarter with not a lot of E1 events that we may have the payments for the maintenance reserves that go together with the lease payments, but not the drawdown. I think the way we haven't had a lot of E1s leaving, but we're very excited about the recent progress that we've made with the E1s because we sold one in Q3, we sold one in Q4. We have the MoU to start accelerating their exit, and that's when you're going to see that balance start to come down. The other thing that drives that balance is FX. Not only to hit an asset in terms of prepaid cash that has already left the company, but that balance is all in dollars. As the currency fluctuates, you will see that balance going up and down as well.
Josh, one of the benefits you get with the subleasing of these 32 E1s is that the redelivery conditions now transfer to the new lessee. That's one of the benefits that you have is they use the aircraft for the remaining term of the lease. They're responsible for their portion of the return conditions.
Okay. Very clear response. Thank you very much.
Our next question comes from Pablo Monsivais, Barclays.
Hello. Hi, guys. Congrats on the results. I have one follow-up question. Can you please share with us what is putting some pressure on unit revenues in the third quarter and probably in the fourth quarter of 2019 that is causing your lower margin guidance despite better unit cost performance? Is there anything incremental here that we should be aware of? Thanks.
Hey, Pablo. Abhi here. As I kind of talked about earlier in the call, there were sort of two effects that are putting pressure on RASK on a year-over-year basis. One is the higher base from last year. We had a record month almost every month last year, the second half of the year, including September, October, November. The biggest effect that we're having is the effect of the aircraft mix. The A320s are flying double the average stage length, and they are 50% bigger. On an absolute basis, that aircraft has a lower absolute RASK than the other aircraft. If you look at our RASK for each and every equipment type, they all actually went up year over year. Our A320s went up in capacity 100%, and our RASK was up more than 5% on the A320s.
However, because they have a lower absolute number, as they become a larger and larger percentage in terms of ASK weighting in the network, that brings down the overall RASK of the airline. That's why we're looking at 3Q and 4Q RASK of close to zero. Close to zero actually means that we are recovering 7-8 points of RASK that's a headwind due to the aircraft mix. I actually think revenue is doing very well. We're able to implement the capacity, and the demand is there. As I said, this is our second-best-ever third quarter in the history of Azul, with by far the most ASKs in the history of Azul. The revenue environment is strong. We're just having the effects in terms of year-over-year RASK due to the strong base last year and the effect of the aircraft mix.
I'd also say, we never promised to forever increase RASK. In fact, these new generation aircraft can allow us to reduce RASK over the coming years and expand margins. That's the whole key of bringing in an aircraft that has unit costs that are 25% and 29% lower than our actual aircraft. It's really going to strengthen the network as we move forward. The fact that the market was able to accept all the capacity that we put into it and to have RASK up 1.7% on a stage length adjusted basis, I think is a strength to the network that we have.
Of course. Perfect. Thank you very much.
Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you would like to pose a question, please press the star key followed by one. Our next question comes from Lucas Barbosa, Morgan Stanley.
Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. My question is on the A321neos. Can you walk us through the strategy for these aircraft? I can imagine they will be allocated in the highest density routes in the domestic market, but any color you can give on where they will be allocated will help a lot. Also, if you could give any color on how their unit costs compare to the A320neos, that would be great. Thanks very much.
Hey, Lucas. Yeah, in terms of where to put these aircraft, I'm obviously very excited to have this airplane into our network. One of the unique benefits that we have in our network is we have a hub in São Paulo, in Campinas. We have a hub in Belo Horizonte. We have a hub in Recife, all of which are very meaningfully sized hubs. Recife approaching 80 departures a day. Belo Horizonte approaching 100 departures a day to 45 destinations. Of course, Campinas with 160 departures a day. Just connecting the hubs to each other is going to be the first mission of the A321. This not only helps the economics of those routes, but it helps the economics of all of the other routes that connect. We're able to drive a lot more connectivity with each one of those flights than we were before.
Similar to what we did with the E1 to the A320, we can now do with the A320 to the A321. The first job is just to connect the hubs to each other, and then, of course, we have our focus cities like Cuiabá, like Belém, like Curitiba, like Porto Alegre, that they themselves have connectivity within them. There's a lot of opportunity as well. Given how broad our network is and how broad the platform is throughout the country, there's just a lot of opportunity for us with the A321s. In terms of the cost economics, we're very excited. We think that the trip cost of the A321 is just going to be slightly higher than that of the A320, and that's with 40 additional seats. You're going to see additional unit cost leverage for us as we use this aircraft.
It's going to help us lower our unit cost further. Given the strength of the network and how broad the network is, I'm very confident that we can protect the revenue and actually improve revenue across the network with this airplane.
Okay, thanks very much. That makes a lot of sense.
Our next question comes from Savi Syth, Raymond James.
Savi.
Excuse me, Savi. Your line is open.
Hi, sorry about that. Hey, if you could follow up on the MOU for the E1. Just how quickly do you envision those aircraft leaving the fleet versus kind of the prior expectation now that you have this?
Yes, Savi, there's as many as 10 next year alone in 2020. Then we have our natural lease returns as well. As Alex said, we've also sold one in the fourth quarter of this year. It's going to be a significant transition out of the E1s. As you look at 2021 to 2022, I think you're going to see almost all of our E1s exiting our fleet in that period of time.
Yeah. Savi, one thing that I think is good to clarify, thanks for the question, is the fleet plan that we have on our institutional deck, that's our expected delivery time. That's not the contractual time. The success that we've had, it may accelerate one year, but a lot of it is already incorporated. I think, like John said, there's such a big exit in 2020 that maybe we're going to kind of beat the fleet plan in 2020. That's already an objective of ours. That's not the contractual delivery schedule. It's actually what we believe we can accomplish with all the marketing effort that we're doing in order to sell our owned E1s and to sublease the leased E1s.
Embraer has the ability to pull forward our deliveries.
For the E2s, correct.
E2s.
Makes sense. With the Airbus, do you expect some catch up next year, or do you expect some of these delays kind of continuing into the following years?
It's got to get better, right? We've been hearing that for a while, but we expect them to get back. I think the A321s have been a lot more delayed than the A320neos. Hopefully we're down to a two, three-month delay as opposed to six months delayed is what we've seen.
Embraer is pretty flexible. If we are able to get rid of E1s quicker, even in 2021, they can give us more E2 deliveries to speed that up even quicker. We're working really hard to do that, not just with this MOU, but with others as well.
Got it. All very helpful. Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you would like to pose a question, please press star one. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's question and answer session. I would like to invite John to proceed with his closing statements. Please go ahead, sir.
Thanks for joining us today. We appreciate your support and look forward to talking with you over the next couple of days if you have further questions about our results. Thanks, everybody.
Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the Azul audio conference for today. Thank you very much for your participation, and have a good day.