Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. On behalf of BASF, I would like to welcome you to our conference call on the first quarter 2022 results. Throughout today's recorded presentations, all participants will be in listen-only mode. The presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. If any participant has difficulty hearing the conference, please press the star key followed by zero on your telephone for operator assistance. This presentation contains forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current estimates and projections of the board of executive directors and currently available information. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of the future developments and results outlined therein. These are dependent on a number of factors. They involve various risks and uncertainties, and they are based on assumptions that may not prove to be accurate.
Such risk factors include those discussed in opportunities and risks of the BASF Report 2021. BASF does not assume any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation above and beyond the legal requirements. On the call with me today are Martin Brudermüller, Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors, and Hans-Ulrich Engel, Chief Financial Officer. Please be aware that we have already posted the speech on our website and also the slides at basf.com/q1 2022. Now, I would like to hand over to Martin Brudermüller.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Today, I would like to start with a few thoughts and concerns about the war in Ukraine. We are deeply appalled and shocked by Russia's brutal attack on Ukraine. With each day, the Ukrainian people are subjected to unspeakably barbaric acts that cannot go unpunished. Our thoughts are with all those suffering as a result of this war. We all hope that the war will be ended very soon. As a company, however, we must prepare for a long war with all consequences. It is exceptionally challenging to take the right decisions for a company in such circumstances. We are seeing considerable regional differences, supply chain interruptions, high raw material and energy prices, as well as serious geopolitical tensions. In such disturbing times, it is difficult to simply move on to the agenda, but this is our task for today's conference call.
On April 11, BASF released preliminary figures for the first quarter of 2022. Today, Hans-Ulrich Engel and I will provide you with further details regarding our business development in Q1 2022. This slide summarizes the current market environment for industry, customers, and consumers. The overall macroeconomic environment is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and volatility caused by the war in Ukraine, the ongoing pandemic, as well as supply chain shortages. We are facing strong price increases for all input factors. Drastically higher energy, high industrial raw materials, and logistic costs are the main reasons for the elevated price levels. Furthermore, production and exports of agricultural products from Ukraine and Russia are already impacted and will be further substantially reduced by the war, which is causing prices for grain and food to rise globally.
Due to the reoccurrence of the coronavirus in China and the country's zero-COVID strategy, economic growth in China is softening. In Q1 2022, China recorded year-on-year GDP growth of 4.8% compared with 4%, year-on-year growth in Q4 2021. This was stronger than expected by analysts, but does not yet fully reflect the impact of the current COVID-related lockdowns in many Chinese cities. Furthermore, automotive production is limited by shortages in semiconductors, and now additionally by the shortage of wire harnesses. For 2022, IHS Markit has thus cut its outlook for global automotive production to 81 million units, a reduction of around 3 million units.
To sum up, the key challenges and downsides for 2022 are direct and indirect effects originating from the war against Ukraine, pandemic-related lockdowns in China, as well as the persistent shortages affecting the automotive industry. Let's now turn to BASF's business development in Q1 2022. We had a strong start to the year and delivered an EBIT before special items of EUR 2.8 billion, an increase of 21% compared with Q1 2021. All segments contributed to the strong earnings growth, except for Surface Technologies, where shortages continued to limit demand from the global automotive industry. In the first quarter of 2022, all segments achieved price and volume growth, again with the exception of Surface Technologies.
The downstream segments, Nutrition & Care and Agricultural Solutions, implemented considerable price increases and improved their earnings compared with the prior year quarter. I would like to add that the positive business development in the first quarter of 2022 also continued in April. Our order book looks solid except for the automotive industry in China. All in all, we are still confident about our performance in 2022, but have to prepare for changes in the economic environment from a possibly long war in Ukraine. We are monitoring the current developments very closely, and we already feel negative impacts on the supply and prices of energy and raw materials, as well as on the participation of Wintershall Dea. I will dive deeper into these two topics in a moment.
The war has led to a drastic price increase for energy and various raw materials in Europe. A high level of uncertainty regarding future supplies. So far, however, the supply of BASF key raw materials such as natural gas or naphtha is not limited. To avoid disruptions, we are coordinating closely with our suppliers, network operations, and government agency as the case may be. Moving on to our participation in Wintershall Dea. First and foremost, it is important to note that no sanctions apply either to Wintershall Dea, to the minority shareholder, LetterOne, to Wintershall Dea's operation in Russia, and to its midstream business. At the beginning of March, Wintershall Dea decided not to pursue any additional gas and oil production projects in Russia, and stopped all planning for new projects.
Furthermore, Wintershall Dea has recognized impairment charges in the first quarter of 2022 that BASF included in its net income from shareholdings on a proportional basis with around EUR 1.1 billion. These impairments were caused by the war in Ukraine and related political consequences and concerned in addition to the Nord Stream 2 loan, assets in Russia, and in the gas transportation business. We are sticking to our strategic decision to withdraw from the oil and gas business. However, we are aware that an IPO is difficult in the current market environment. It is not yet possible to indicate what the impact of the war in Ukraine will have on our exit as a whole and on the timeline. I will now provide you with further details regarding the impact of the drastically increased gas prices in Europe.
Compared with the first quarter of 2021, the additional costs for BASF European sites amounted to EUR 900 million. Compared with the first quarter of 2020, the increase was EUR 1.1 billion. To mitigate these higher costs, we implemented several measures. On a global scale, and particularly in Europe, we have increased and will further increase our sales prices to pass on higher natural gas prices. At our European sites, where technically feasible preparations to substitute natural gas by alternative feedstocks are ongoing. For example, our modern combined heat and power plant in Schwarzheide can be operated with natural gas or other oil-based feedstocks. We are also proactively developing scenarios to optimize our production at European sites in the event that Germany is forced to allocate natural gas.
In doing so, we are focusing on processes that are very energy-intensive or that use large amounts of natural gas as raw material. One product in focus is certainly ammonia, a key building block for various value chains such as fertilizers, plastics and fibers, and resins and glues. We take these developments very seriously and have set up teams to monitor the situation around the clock. Let's now briefly look at the macroeconomic environment before we turn to the volume development of our segment. According to the currently available data, global chemical production increased by 3.7% in Q1 2022 compared with the prior year quarter. The growth was most pronounced in North America with 9.4%. In the prior year quarter, this region recorded a decline due to the freeze of the U.S. Gulf Coast.
In Europe, the growth rate was 2%. In China, chemical production increased by 4.7% despite a strong comparison base. In Asia, excluding China, chemical production decreased by 1.9%. Moving on to the volume development by segment. In the first quarter of 2022, sales volumes of BASF Group declined by 0.8%. This was due to the considerable volume decline in the Surface Technologies. Lower precious metal trading volumes accounted for around 70% of the volume decline in this segment. Excluding the precious metal trading activities, BASF's group sales volume grew by 3% in the first quarter of 2022. On a segment level, the volume growth in absolute terms was most pronounced in the Agricultural Solutions, Industrial Solutions, Materials, and Nutrition & Care segments.
Now I would like to hand over to Hans for further details.
Thank you, Martin. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Let me start with our sales and earnings development in Q1 2022. At BASF Group level, sales increased by 19% to EUR 23.1 billion. Sales prices rose by 15.5%. Currency effects of +4.2% also contributed to the positive sales development. As already mentioned, BASF Group's EBIT before special items reached EUR 2.8 billion, an increase of around EUR 500 million compared with Q1 2021. On a segment level, chemicals contributed most to the increase in earnings. Compared with the first quarter of 2021, EBIT before special items rose considerably, mainly due to higher margins in both divisions. The intermediates division significantly improved margins in North America and Asia Pacific.
Lower margins in Europe as a result of sharply increased gas prices were therefore more than offset. Improved income from shareholdings accounted for using the equity method also contributed to the earnings growth. Key drivers for the earnings growth in Petrochemicals division were higher margins in the propylene and butadiene value chains, as well as for styrene monomers. Lower margins for cracker products due to higher raw materials and energy prices were more than offset. EBIT before special items in the Materials segment also increased considerably compared to the prior year quarter. This was mainly driven by significantly higher EBIT before special items in the Monomers division.
Which in turn was primarily due to increased margins in the.
Please hold the line. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for holding. The conference will begin shortly. Please hold the line.
Can you hear us again?
Yes, we can hear you again. You can continue.
Sorry for the pause. We had a technical issue. Hans, I suggest you start with the segment you just began.
And that was the-
Industrial Solutions.
Industrial Solutions segment. Also in the Industrial Solutions segment, EBIT before special items was considerably higher than in the first quarter of 2021. Both divisions, Dispersions & Resins, as well as Performance Chemicals, increased earnings strongly due to positive price and volume developments. Compared with the prior year quarter, EBIT before special items in both divisions of the Surface Technologies segment declined considerably. The main reason for the decline in earnings in the Catalysts division was a significantly lower contribution from the precious metal trading activities. EBIT before special items in the Coatings division decreased mainly due to higher fixed costs and weaker margins on the back of higher raw material prices. EBIT before special items of the Nutrition & Care segment was considerably above the first quarter of 2021.
In the Care Chemicals division, EBIT before special items increased mainly as a result of the positive volume development. The earnings growth in the Nutrition & Health division was due to increased margins. These more than offset higher fixed costs, which mainly resulted from higher depreciation following the start-up of the vitamin A plant expansion in Ludwigshafen in the second quarter of 2021. Since the end of January 2022, we are again selling regular commercial volumes of Lutavit A. We will continue to ramp up our production volumes throughout 2022. EBIT before special items in the Agricultural Solutions segment grew slightly compared with the strong first quarter of 2021. This was predominantly a result of the sales increase. Higher fixed costs dampened the positive earnings development.
In the following, I will turn to the financial figures of BASF Group in the first quarter of 2022 compared with the prior year quarter in more detail. I will start with EBITDA before special items and EBITDA, which both reached EUR 3.7 billion compared with EUR 3.2 billion in Q1 2021. EBIT before special items came in at EUR 2.8 billion compared with EUR 2.3 billion in the prior year quarter. Special items in EBIT amounted to EUR -34 million compared with EUR -10 million in the first quarter of 2021. EBIT increased by 20.5% to EUR 2.8 billion in Q1 2022. Net income from shareholdings decreased from EUR +68 million in Q1 2021 to EUR -797 million in Q1 2022.
The decline was driven by impairment charges relating to assets of Wintershall Dea. Net income amounted to EUR 1.2 billion compared to EUR 1.7 billion in the prior year quarter. The decrease was mainly driven by the impairment charges I just mentioned. The tax rate was 29.6% compared with 19.4% in Q1 2021. The increase in the tax rate was particularly driven by the loss in net income from shareholdings, which is an after-tax position. This led to a lower income before income taxes without affecting the income tax. Reported earnings per share declined from EUR 1.87 in the prior year to EUR 1.37 in Q1 2022. Adjusted EPS rose from EUR 2 to EUR 2.70. Cash flows from operating activities improved compared to the prior year quarter.
Let's look at the details of our cash flow development in Q1 2022 compared to the prior year quarter. Cash flows from operating activities amounted to −EUR 290 million, an improvement of EUR 235 million compared to the prior year quarter. The improvement was mainly driven by the better operational performance and comes despite the high cash tied up in working capital resulting from increased input costs and strong sales growth. The non-cash effective impairments at Wintershall Dea are eliminated in miscellaneous items together with the regular at-equity results. If the impairments had instead been eliminated in net income, net income would have been roughly EUR 600 million higher than in the prior year quarter.
Cash flows from investing activities amounted to -EUR 579 million in the first quarter of 2022, after -EUR 435 million in the prior year quarter. Payments made for property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets rose by 32% to -EUR 603 million. Cash flows from financing activities amounted to EUR 2.7 billion, an increase of almost EUR 2 billion, mainly due to higher financial and similar liabilities. Free cash flow improved by EUR 88 million to -EUR 893 million, sorry, in Q1 2022. Turning to the balance sheet, where we see the following compared with year-end 2021. Total assets increased by EUR 6.6 billion to EUR 94 billion.
Non-current assets amounted to EUR 51.3 billion, a decrease of EUR 1.1 billion, mainly resulting from the impairment charges related to assets of Wintershall Dea. Current assets increased by EUR 7.7 billion to EUR 42.7 billion, primarily due to higher trade accounts receivable. These rose by EUR 3.4 billion, mainly due to the seasonal effects in the Agricultural Solutions segment. In addition, cash and cash equivalents, other receivables and miscellaneous assets, as well as inventories contributed to the increase. Net debt increased by EUR 1.9 billion to EUR 16.3 billion at the end of March 2022. The equity ratio was 45.3% compared with 48.2% at the end of 2021. With that, back to you, Martin.
Thank you, Hans. The global macroeconomic outlook is currently subject to very high uncertainty. In particular, it is impossible to predict the further development of the war in Ukraine and its impact on the prices and availability of energy and raw materials. Consequently, we are currently maintaining our macroeconomic assumptions for the 2022 business year. BASF group sales and earnings forecast for the 2022 business year, as published in the BASF report 2021, is being maintained. Sales between EUR 74 billion-EUR 77 billion, EBIT before special items between EUR 6.6 billion-EUR 7.2 billion, ROCE of between 11.4%-12.6%, and CO2 emissions of between 19.6-20.6 million metric tons. We are now glad to take your questions.
Yeah, ladies and gentlemen, I would now like to open the call for your questions. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star, followed by one on their touch-tone telephone. For the best sound quality, we kindly ask you to be sure to unmute your phone and use your headset when asking your question. Please limit your questions ideally to only one or maximum two at a time so that everybody has a chance to ask their question, since we need to finish this call on time today because our annual shareholders meeting will begin at 10:00 A.M., Central European Time. We now have a first question from Christian Faitz. We will then have Chetan Udeshi and then Andrew Stott. Now Christian Faitz, Kepler Cheuvreux, please go ahead.
Yes, good morning, everybody. Thank you very much for taking my one question. Can you in any way qualify or even better quantify how much of your operations in China are affected by the lockdowns at present?
Yeah, good morning. Can you hear me, Christian?
Yes.
Okay, good. We have a bit of a problem here with our microphone. That's a very good but difficult to answer question. When going through our businesses, we have businesses in China which are unaffected, and we have businesses which are heavily affected. I give you the example of our catalyst automotive catalyst business in China, which in the month of April, and this is information from the beginning of this week, has roughly volume-wise sold 60% or delivered, I have to say, 60% less bricks than in the prior year months.
We have other businesses, which are unaffected because they are not in a lockdown area because they have access to the logistics they need to have access to, and also their customers are not affected. Overall, it's difficult to quantify that effect at this point in time because we don't have the full set of numbers that I would need to qualify it or quantify it. It's clear that in the month of April, we will see a measurable effect from the lockdowns in China. The question is how this will continue going into the month of May then.
Christian, maybe I quickly add on this. I mean, I think there is the general deadlock position that the Chinese government cannot really escape from their zero-COVID strategy. They would have to ask for the Western vaccines to actually milden the situation. That is a little bit a difficult situation how to get out of that. On the other hand, you know, I lived there for 10 years, and I'm quite sure they will take the appropriate measures to turn that around when it's getting really critical for China. I think over the next weeks and maybe 1 to 3 months it will be more difficult, and we will see that volumes will go down.
I think already the pictures with the ships in front of the Shanghai Harbor will also tell us that this is something that goes beyond China, because there will be also in and out of China parts be missing that will have impact on a global level. On the other hand, and that is also China, I just wanted to tell you, not only in our plants, but also with certainly many other companies, we have our employees who have actually not been locked down, taking their sleeping bag and everything they need, and they sleep in the plants in the BASF sites now for four weeks.
First of all, imagine that commitment is nowhere else in the world, and you could not imagine in Europe. They keep all our plants running, so we don't have any single one shut down in the moment. As Hans said, you have then certainly also supply chain, and you have to coordinate with your customers. That also shows you that there will be countermeasures. I think it is very, very difficult to calculate or quantify that in this moment of time.
Sorry.
As always, thanks.
Move on then.
Yeah. Go ahead. Sorry.
Okay. Now, Chetan Udeshi from JPMorgan, please.
Hey. One is, can you remind us how much of BASF production is in Europe in terms of production capacities or volumes? How much of production today is in Germany? Just for us to know. The second question, I mean, of course, there are a lot of uncertainties today. Based on what you can see in your current order book earnings environment, can you give us some sense of are you comfortable with what you see in terms of Q2 consensus or full-year numbers which are probably at the low end of your guidance range, based on current trends? Thank you.
Yeah, Chetan, this is Hans . Thanks for your two questions. First of all, production is order of magnitude 40%-45% in Europe of the global production. If I think Germany, now this is a rough number that I'm giving you, that is 50% plus of the production in Europe. Order book. The order book is strong, is solid, as Martin has already said in his speech. There are two weaker spots. The one is automotive for the known reasons. The other one is China.
As we said with respect to China, when you read about China and the lockdowns there, and you look at the order books, you don't see reflected, let me say, the intensity of the lockdowns in our order books. That is something that may change. Other than that, the order book, as I say, robust, solid. As always, we have a very good look for the next 30 days, which reflect about 60% of total orders. We then have for 30-60 days, we have round about 30% in the order book.
Looking at all of that, as I said, this is solid and robust, with the two just mentioned exceptions. Yes, we had a very strong quarter, no question about it. You can calculate the percentage compared to guidance. I think what is important to see, and the first two questions, your question and the question of Christian already indicate that, there is so much uncertainty out there, that at this point in time, we simply said, we'll stick to the guidance, that we gave in the end of February.
We now move on to Andrew Stott. In a minute, we will then have Matthew Yates, Mubasher Chaudhry, and then Jaideep Pandya. Now it's Andrew Stott, UBS, please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks, Stefanie. Morning. Martin, you mentioned in your speech that you know you're looking at what you can do in the scenario that Germany is forced to allocate natural gas. You're also looking where, as you said, technically feasible, you can actually substitute natural gas. Can you talk more about that scenario planning? Is it sort of shifting more to Antwerp and other sites? Are you building inventory at the moment? Yeah, just thoughts on what you're actually looking at here as plan B, plan C, et cetera. Thank you.
Yeah. Andrew Stott, maybe I'll start and focus a little bit on Ludwigshafen. What? Oh, there's an echo now. Andrew Stott...
I can hear you clearly, Martin. Thanks.
Okay. Good. Good. I focus on Ludwigshafen, which is about 70% of our gas usage in Europe. We have about 4% of Germany, so we are the industrial user. You see the enormous numbers here. Just to give you an indication, about half of that is actually the energy production. That means steam and electricity in the cogeneration plant. Then the next largest product is actually ammonia, and then it's acetylene for BDO, and then you have the large consumers. The first thing is that we actually continue to accelerate and try to accelerate the energy transformation or transition into the renewables, because that would give us the opportunity to partially reduce the gas-fired power plant. That would be definitely helpful.
As I said, the big lever is actually ammonia, because ammonia is the largest consumer, and that is, on the other hand, a global commodity. You earn quite nice money with it in the moment because it is short, but that is also something where you, in the long run, could think about buying ammonia, substituting own production. You could even go for green ammonia over the time, which would reduce also your CO2 emissions and then save investment costs. These are the kind of things we are looking into. The more trivial thing is actually you look on your cogeneration plants today and we, for example, find out you have some 15% of the fuel which you can substitute by directly, immediately by oil. You use all these kind of levers. We have some tars.
We shift the task to reduce the consumption, and we have actually gone to a technical limit, which is about 50% of the gas consumption in Ludwigshafen. If it would go significantly below that, it actually means that you have to shut down the site. I think that is. I made this very popular and very transparent, I think for good reasons, because first, you as investors have to know about that because that's a major risk. On the other hand, also the German government has to know it because they are the ones who would allocate the gas in certain scenarios, and they also know then what that means if BASF would not produce and what it would mean for the value chains.
In Antwerp, the situation is much less gas, but there it is even more pronounced. We have about, roughly 50% of the gas consumption is ammonia. You see one of the key considerations, short-term and long-term going forward, will be actually the production of ammonia and how you arrange around that. You see there are many levers, and I can only say we are very happy that we have the wind park already. We are going for other projects. We have the heat pump project. That will all help us to reduce natural gas. Yes, I would have loved that we are one or two years advanced, but I can only echo here what I said also in the media. It is not possible in a large amount to reduce the gas consumption.
That is something that we have to live with this uncertainty for quite a while.
Okay. Thank you for that. Are you prepared to build inventory, if customers require it, considering all the supply chain issues?
Well, you always certainly look into this, and I think as already in the pandemic crisis, the coordination and the communication to your customers is really intensified. People talk about and know about what they need, where they are concerned, and certainly we try to adapt our stocks over there. I think also the customers have raised their stocks because of rising prices. They have been going for securing materials, also, over the recent months and weeks. Yes, you can imagine that we are as flexible enough to adapt on that opportunity.
Thanks for your thoughts.
We move on to Matthew Yates, Bank of America now.
Good morning, everyone. Maybe two questions. The first one, you've left your guidance unchanged, which is totally understandable given the uncertainty out there. Specifically on the oil price assumption, if you were to mechanically move from $75 to $100 a barrel, do you think that would impact your profit guidance, or is the tightness in the market sufficient to pass that through? The second question was around agriculture. You had a nice 10% year-on-year increase in profits there. Given the backdrop we have of crop prices, I'm not sure if you would have hoped for even more profit growth. Are you seeing any sort of demand destruction on the crop protection side as farmers allocate money towards fertilizers?
Is there any issue here around timing and perhaps we're gonna have a strong Q2 to look forward to in ag? Thank you.
Matthew, I take the first one, and Hans maybe take the second one. I mean, on the first one, that is this magic formula between strong demand and pricing power. I promised you, Hans promised you, in the last call that we are heavily going for price increases, and I am actually quite proud what the BASF team did. If you see now in the Q1 numbers, we have actually everywhere, even also in the downstream area where we said we are in a delay by the pricing mechanisms. We have significantly increased the prices. You ask now if we're going to have these high oil prices and then what that would mean. I mean, it would strongly depend on the demand part.
If the demand continues to be strong and there is maybe shortage and we have a reasonable or good demand supply, then actually I think you can also live with these high raw material prices and energy prices, and they don't like it, the customers, maybe, but they pay for it. If on the other hand the demand would really go down because we would now run into a recession in Europe because Ukraine and Russia is 8% of GDP and the shortages and the supply chain disruptions would really take down GDP globally significantly, then certainly the pricing power at the absolute level where we are will be going down. I mean, then the resistance of the customers will go up.
In the current moment, I would say, yes, no one likes it, but we are actually quite successfully handing over, and it certainly starts very nicely and quick in the chemicals and Materials segments. That's why they also contributed again in this environment so much. Again, I'm really happy, and we promised this to you. We have also made significant inroads on the downstream segments to go increase prices. As long as economy is not collapsing and we don't get into stagflation, you have a strong inflation and then growth going down, then I would say that has a good chance to go on for quite some months. Hans, on the second?
Yeah, Matthew, happy to take your question on ag. I think with respect to price and price increases, there's a 7.7% price increase. We have roughly 10% volume increase, so with respect to demand destruction due to increased fertilizer prices, increased other input costs that farmers have to digest.
I think there is a strong appetite going into the season in the northern hemisphere based on everything that we can see on the farmer side, and this is explained by the development of the soft commodity prices. If you look at soy prices, wheat prices, corn prices, all on an elevated level, actually on higher levels than what we've seen in the years 2012 through 2015. I think this is despite the really strong increases on input costs, that's a good background for a strong AgSolutions business at BASF. I think Q1 has shown that.
Q1 with EUR 60 million improvement on EBIT before special items basis from EUR 800 to EUR 860 comparing to a very strong quarter already in Q1 of last year is good proof of what the business can deliver in the current environment.
Very good. Thank you both.
Okay. We move on to Mubasher from Citi now.
Hi. Thank you for taking my question. Just the one left, please. Could you provide some comments around the gas price assumption that you're making for the rest of the year? Just trying to understand kind of what the impact could be. Thank you.
Yeah. Yeah, Mubasher, that's a great question. I mean, in the month of March, we've seen. We do this strange thing in Europe. We look at gas prices in euro per megawatt hours. I'll build the bridge in a second while I try to build it to dollars per million BTU. We've seen in euro per megawatt hour gas prices at a level of EUR 85 low and EUR 360 intraday high. So that translates in US dollars per million BTU to something in the order of magnitude of, let's say, round about $100 per million BTU high and $25 per million BTU low.
Now, giving a reliable gas price forecast for the remainder of the year in the current situation is almost impossible. We have a base case assumption, which I will not disclose here, because a month from now you may call me a fool, because I told you what kind of gas price basic assumption we are using. I hope that the kind of volatility that I just described lets you understand how difficult it is to forecast gas prices in the current environment.
Everything depends on whether we can hand it over. That's the critical point.
Sure, sure. I did, yeah, I just wanted to get because you disclosed the oil price assumption. I was just wondering if there was something for the gas price as well. Anyway, that's very helpful. Thank you.
Sure.
We will now have Jaideep Pandya from On Field Investment Research, and then we have four more participants in the queue. That will be then Peter Clark, Andreas Heine, Markus Mayer, and Laurent Favre to conclude. Now it's Jaideep Pandya, On Field Investment Research.
Thank you. Firstly, I would just want to understand, sort of, you know, what is your naphtha purchases out of, if you are purchasing any naphtha, which is Russian origin, and how difficult or easy is it to replace that? You know, are you seeing any problems with regards to sourcing naphtha or for that matter LPG in Europe? And then, sort of in light of that, with higher ethane prices, higher LNG exports out of Europe, do you see sort of a tough time for the global sort of cracker landscape? That's my first question. And the second question is just really understanding what is your worst case or plan B scenario, for the oil and gas business?
I appreciate you know, you can't IPO it right now, but, you know, if you can't IPO it forever, then what would that mean for BASF? Thanks a lot.
Jaideep, thanks for the questions. Naphtha, so when I look at the years, let's take 2021 as a year. In 2021, we didn't source any naphtha directly from Russia. We're sourcing naphtha via traders in Europe. The Russian share in 2021 is in the high 30% range. Nobody can say that exactly, but this is if you think about the traders we are dealing with and their respective portfolios, you know, where the ships are coming from. That's the order of magnitude, just short of 40% in 2021.
We've reduced this in the first quarter, maybe more specific, starting from the beginning of March, already by a measurable amount. The clear target is to reduce further and to get to zero Russian sourced naphtha as quickly as possible. Our team and procurement is working on that heavily. We consider that as doable. It's a different situation than the situation that you have with natural gas in Germany and in Europe. You have a different market. Transportation is different, obviously by ship, mostly and not by pipeline.
That is comparable actually to the oil situation, where it is also easier to become less dependent on Russian supply in Europe. It comes or may come with higher prices for naphtha in Europe. When we look at Q1 and in particular the months of March, we see that our cracker business in Europe goes strong despite the naphtha prices which are on an elevated level. I think on average, we were at $900 per ton in the months of March for naphtha. Hope that helps to put things in perspective. On the Wintershall Dea side, as Martin said, the strategic decision is clear. We will find ways to implement that.
An IPO in the current situation is obviously extremely difficult, not to say impossible. I can guarantee you that we are working on that and we will find a way to implement the strategic decision that BASF has taken.
Thanks a lot for the increased disclosure, on the natural gas side as well. Thank you.
Sure.
Okay, now Peter Clark, Société Générale, please go ahead.
Yes, good morning, everyone. It's this question I think for Martin. You talked about the strong demonstration of pricing downstream. If I take coatings, your 3.9% Q4 to 8.6%, very apparent there. It suggests to me you're even getting traction on the auto OEM side now quite significantly, but you've still got some catch up. I'm just wondering where you see the inflection point on the margins in something like coatings. You talked about still pricing power for the next few months. Will we be looking at the second half, maybe margins turning on the margin on the coating side?
I mean, first of all, you mentioned already, and if you look on the segment numbers here, I think from the price increase, and I think we explained the Surface Technologies and the particular situation over there. All the others in particular downstream really did a good job, 21% in Nutrition & Care, Industrial Solutions, 19%. In the Coatings area, yes, we were able to significantly increase our sales and have been rising prices due to higher raw material costs. Certainly if you have lower number of cars produced, your pricing power is more limited. This is exactly what I said. It goes hand in hand.
If I just take the numbers here, actually, from the planning from the IHS, who actually expect this 81.6 million cars to be produced. It's roughly a 6% increase. The fact is that year to date is -5%. With that, you see basically that lower number of cars are produced, and with that the pricing power in Coatings is limited. They increase because everyone knows that there are higher prices for everyone, but you could not really increase to significantly increase your margins over there. I think in that particular part where you're talking about in Coatings, it will only come if actually the limitations in car productions are reduced, because then it's booming again and then certainly you have also pricing power.
I think that is this magic formula, which now in automotive is very clear by the production numbers, but that is going through all the different segments. You can see actually from the part, and that is also emphasizing the words of Hans when it comes to order books and everything. We would have not been so successful in all the other segments if there would actually not be a strong demand. I hope that answers your question, Peter.
Yeah. What you're suggesting is the auto OEM pricing is still very sluggish compared to the other two bits of that business.
Absolutely. This is the area where this is most difficult for the reasons I said.
Got it. Thank you.
We move on to Andreas Heine, Stifel.
Yeah, two quick ones, please. Thanks for having the opportunity. At first, chemicals, at least I was most surprised seeing that segment being so strong in Q1. Looking on the margins, what you see in the second quarter, how do they develop sequentially? That's the first question. And the second, in agro, there's quite some wording on crop protection side, but in the first quarter, the seed business is most important. Could you give some insight what you see in price and volume for your most important seed areas, so canola, cotton, and soybean? Please.
Andreas, this is Hans. On your second question with respect to ag business and then particular seed, very strong start in Q1 with the seed business both on with respect to top line, but then also with respect to earnings. Good strong development there. As I say, better than what we had in Q1 of 2021. One thing comes to mind that I should have said when one of the earlier questions came on the ag business. With respect to seed, this is obviously primarily a Q1 business. The remainder of the ag business, so the good old crop protection business is Q1 and Q2 business. Their timing can always play a role.
That's something that I forgot to say. With respect to your question, on seed, a good strong business, better than in Q1 of last year. This is actually the big part of the season in Q1 for ag, Northern Hemisphere.
Andreas, maybe a quick comment on the margins in the chemical arena. I mean, first of all, if you look on all our crackers, they actually run in the very high 90s%. So very, very strong utilization, which underlines the order book and then also the demand on the market. If you take then some single product, like for example, an acrylic acid, yeah, margins have been coming down a little bit from the peak. If you compare that with the five-year average margin, you are still at a very, very high level.
Same is also true if you look in MDI and TDI, where actually, particularly MDI, this is still ranging out to the areas where we have been last year. That really shows that it is this underlying demand which is still very strong and which really allows you to hand over all the increases from the raw material side as well as from the energy side. Because certainly if you look into several of the products, whether this is ammonia, whether this cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, I mean, you know all these products, they've actually increased their pricing significantly. Based on the strong demand, you can really hand over the increases impartially in the one or the other, really also hold the margins.
In the April margin in the chemicals is still very, very high.
Thanks a lot.
Now we have Markus Mayer, and then the final participant to ask questions will be Laurent Favre. Markus Mayer, Baader Helvea. Please go ahead.
Yeah, good morning, Martin Brudermüller, Hans-Ulrich Engel, and Stefanie Wettberg. Two questions which circle basically around this kind of change of your supply sources. You said that already in the beginning that you now focus more also on renewable sources. My question is, given the new situation of very high oil and gas prices, have you all had also changed your timeline for becoming CO2 neutral or switched to renewable sources like fermentation-based chemicals? And also, in this regard, have you also tried to get more renewable suppliers, or you are pushing your own fermentation capabilities more in this direction? That would be my first question. Sorry for this long question.
The second question is also if you had also several kind of thoughts in previous conference calls on green hydrogen, and that might become also a business case. Or hydrogen in general is kind of a business case for BASF. Given this very high energy cost level you have right now, is this business case or these business cases become now more economically sensible to you?
Maybe on the first one, Markus, the problem is in general, I mean, I think we talked about this several times, there is no way that the whole chemical industry can switch from fossil to bio-based raw materials because that would really stretch all the markets, and you immediately have interference with food and feed markets. That would be very difficult. As we have said in the Capital Markets Day, our example from Henkel. This is actually a customer by customer piece, where you have customers that are very ambitious in sustainability, and they push you, and they do projects like this, and then you try to secure the volumes. I would say in general, for the one or the other solution, fossil-based may be increasing faster than the bio-based.
They're giving in the one or the other area also a case where you could now step in, and that's actually what some of the customers do. We take then these mass balance approaches to facilitate that. That I would see now a massive acceleration of that trend, I would not really say so. There's a lot of stuff going on in that with single customers on single product lines. The most prominent and biggest one was now this Henkel part. Even after we announced the Henkel part, some of the competitors got a little bit nervous and stepped up and said, "We want to do similar things." I would not say that there is now a dramatic change. Green hydrogen, that is also a very difficult situation because overall that is still very expensive.
You might have seen in the news, at least here in Germany, there was a study between done by German government, I think, Australian partners for this green hydrogen. Actually what they said with the full transportation cost to Europe, that would be actually EUR 6.50 per kilogram of hydrogen. If you compare that, in the times before we had the energy prices rising with about something like EUR 1.8 per kilogram in steam reforming, maybe now you are quite significantly higher, certainly with the gas costs. You see how big the gap is in between this. There is no way in the moment, also with the capital you need to install all that and to be invested, that this is really a business case where your customers pay for.
This is why I said we are very much going on direct electrification. Hydrogen has a lower rank in terms of lever of reducing our CO2. The big lever is actually the green hydrogen, the green ammonia. This is what I mentioned earlier. That is the big volumes. That is also of this 1 million tons of hydrogen BASF uses in the group worldwide. Most of that is actually used for ammonia. You could think about these kind of projects. I think there are some areas in the world that getting interesting if you have solar at very low cost, and then maybe even gas in the future where you can use our methane pyrolysis.
That is definitely something worth to look into, with respect to European operations to look into energy costs, but also the rising CO2 costs. That's why, Markus, we are not really super jumping now on this green hydrogen. It's in our considerations, but it's not the prime lever on our way to decarbonize. I think that it's also what we made clear in the Capital Markets Day.
Okay, perfect. Thank you so much for this information.
Now I would like to hand over to Laurent Favre, BNP Paribas.
Thank you, Stefanie. Good morning, all. I'll try another question on Wintershall Dea, income from the dividend, which was cut to the statutory minimum of EUR 6 million. Martin, you said yourself that Wintershall Dea is not directly or indirectly sanctioned. I think there's been changes at the board and at LetterOne as well, and financial performance is, well, I guess pretty obvious to all of us. But then so I think Wintershall Dea said that a dividend could be reinstated depending on circumstances. I was wondering if you could shed a bit of light on whether it's related to governance, operations or something else. Thank you.
No, Laurent Favre, I'm taking your question. Dividend decision was due actually, as always, end of February. You know what kind of a situation we were in at the end of February, and the decision was simply made to postpone the dividend decision to a later point in time. I don't know whether you participated in yesterday's call of Wintershall Dea. You've seen and heard then what the cash position of Wintershall Dea is. I would describe that as rock solid.
I hope that we'll have a bit more certainty with respect to overall developments economically, geopolitically, and that then will put the shareholders in a position to come to a conclusion on the dividend. The timing, my expectation is probably Q3, at the latest beginning of Q4 of this year.
Yeah. Thanks to all of you. Okay. Maybe just one final word from my side. I mean, first of all, I think you saw we really started strong into the year. I think, I hope you also saw that we keep a cool head in this situation. I think this is what you have to have. As you also know that the BASF team is always at its best performance when we are in crisis mode. Be assured that we really leverage everything we can within the sites, within the regions, also within the value chain. That's also the time when you are very close to your customers. We can see that also by the response from our customers, our satisfaction on the customer level. Nevertheless, they have to pay high prices, satisfaction is at a very, very high level.
For that reason, I think, we are now running a little bit on site, so we have to see how it develops. I think there's also good reason to assume that the next month to come could actually be very strong.
Okay, ladies and gentlemen, this brings us to the end of our conference call. As mentioned at the beginning, we will hold BASF Annual Shareholders Meeting right after this conference call, as of 10 A.M. It is, again, an entirely virtual shareholders meeting. On July 27th, we will present our second quarter results. Should you have any further questions at this time, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the BASF IR team. Thank you for joining us this morning.