Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the second quarter results 2024 analysts' conference call of FUCHS SE. This conference will be recorded. As a reminder, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity for the analysts of FUCHS to ask questions. May I now hand over to Lutz Ackermann, Head of Investor Relations at FUCHS SE, who will start the meeting today. Please go ahead.
Yeah, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. On behalf of FUCHS SE, I wish you a very warm welcome to today's conference call on the half-year figures. With me on the call today is Isabelle Adelt, our CFO, and as always, Isabelle will run you through the presentation in a second, and then we will have the Q&A session afterwards. All the documents you can find on the IR section of our homepage since 7:00 A.M. this morning. Having said this, I would like to hand over to Isabelle. Isabelle, please go ahead.
Thank you, Lutz, and a warm welcome from my side as well. We are delighted to guide you through what we believe are good numbers for the first half year of the FUCHS Group. So looking at the highlights of what we present today, we have some very good KPIs, which are perfectly in line with what we predicted in the beginning of the year, despite some adverse developments you can read in the newspapers or see on TV, and obviously what is currently happening all over the world. But we are delighted that we can confirm the outlook for this year. So some highlights of what we saw in the last three months and the first six months of the year: sales are slightly down, but this is only driven by price adjustments due to lower raw material prices.
But as you can see, of course, more moderate than what our input cost did. This is why, despite lower sales, we were able to up our EBIT by EUR 18 million or 9% year-over-year compared to where we were at the same time last year. This, of course, helps us as well to contribute to our mid-term EBIT margin target. We are now 12.4% compared to 11% at the same time last year. This is a very good development because looking at top line, we can see we are back to volume growth. Sales prices are down more moderately than our input costs, and we have some adverse currency effects due to the relatively stronger euros, a euro especially compared to U.S. dollar, Chinese RMB, but a couple of other currencies as well.
But at the same time, we were able to really hold on to the good margins and manage our costs very diligently. So we are satisfied with how the results turned out. All of this led to an earnings per share, which is significantly higher year-over-year. And we're happy to report that we are very close to completing the share buyback. So just to remind you, we announced that we want to buy back 4 million of each share class, which we've done as of last week for the preference shares. And we are about to conclude the ordinary shares in the next couple of days. Free cash flow is lower than last year, but according to our expectations, a major contributor to the difference we see is the net working capital build-up.
So what we see now is that we are back to a more normal pattern in terms of development. If you remember last year, we concluded 2022 with a net working capital over sales of 25%. So we put a lot of effort into reducing safety stock and really getting everything to a normal level. This year, we see the normal pattern we've had in pre-COVID years too, of a build-up in the first half of the year and then a subsequent ramp down in the second half of the year. One highlight to mention before we go into the numbers in a little more detail is the closing of the LUBCON acquisition. We already announced that in our last call that we signed the deal.
And now we're happy to report that as of July 26, we closed the deal, and we can now full throttle include what we believe is a very nice addition to the portfolio to the rest of the group, as well as include the LUBCON numbers, obviously, into our group numbers as of August 1st. So now looking into the numbers in a little bit more detail, sales, as said, we are down year-over-year, but flat over last year. So what does that mean? In total, we already said prices are down a little bit, majorly driven by our price variation clauses. Plus, we have a negative impact from foreign currency, which would, in the conclusion, mean, of course, would be a negative impact overall. We are flat because we had more volume in Q2 this year than we had in Q2 last year.
This is what we already discussed and what we promised you in Q1. We had a slight deviation end of Q1 due to the Easter break being early, but we caught up even a little bit more than that during Q2. In terms of EBIT development compared to last quarter two of 2023, we are up 14%. And I think this is a very good achievement with, of course, different contributions. But I think for me, what is the highlight of this number and why is it so high? There's contribution from all regions. Last year, I think it was more the pattern. We always said EMEA is developing very strongly, and the rest of the world is rather flattish. This has turned this year.
So EMEA yet again had a very strong contribution, but the same is true for China, for Australia, for India, for the U.S., for Mexico, and a lot of other countries. And this is once again stressing the strength of the group and confirms that the decentralized setup we are having is the right one for us as a group. To shed a little bit of light into where actually the decline in sales comes from, on the next slide, you see that, as announced, we do not have any external impacts yet. This will come starting Q3 with the acquisition and the integration of the LUBCON group. But if you look at where the deviation comes from, the organic part of -1% is a combination of high volumes, yet slightly lower sales prices.
On the other hand side, a little bit of headwind from currency because compared to the beginning of the year, the euro is significantly stronger compared to a lot of other currencies. This is what is obviously reflected in the numbers as well. Looking at the P&L in summary, for me, this is a very sound picture. Sales slightly down, obviously, but big step up, especially in gross margins. Compared to last year, at the same time, almost three percentage points. This is due to a variety of reasons. One is really good price realization. One is a lot of focus we put onto procurement, into procurement, procurement conditions. And one is operational excellence, so becoming more efficient, more effective in how we utilize our factories.
All of that combined led to a better gross margin, significantly better gross margin at the end of the first half of the year. At the same time, we were able to manage our other functional costs quite diligently. We have a little bit of tailwind from lower freight and lower energy costs compared to the year before. But of course, we were not able to offset all of the personnel expenses increases given that we saw relatively high labor cost growth rates over the last 2 years especially. But in total, the higher margin we generated, the higher profit was able to offset. This is why we are happy to report a step up in terms of EBIT margin of 1.4 percentage points compared to last year and a step up in EBIT total of EUR 18 million.
CapEx is a little lower year- over- year, but this is only due to timing. So we still stand by the commitment we made that we want to invest basically the same amount we depreciate every year. So this is what we're targeting at for this year too. Then net working capital, we briefly talked about already. So this is the normal seasonal pattern. We usually see the ramp up in terms of receivables and inventories over the first half of the year and then subsequent decline over the second half. Shedding a little bit more light on the different regions. As already stated, EMEA is developing nicely again. So very strong performance, similarly strong as what we saw last year in terms of growth rates. In terms of sales, they are down a little bit more than the other regions. But this is majorly driven by the price variation closes.
Compared to the other region, EMEA has more OEM business. This is why we had to adjust prices accordingly, but nothing really to worry about. The negative currency impacts in EMEA, they're, let's say, almost non-existent. This is due to the fact that we have a lot of different currencies in the EMEA region. While South Africa and Eastern Europe especially were a little bit weaker and we got some headwind from currency, the U.K. gave us some tailwind, and those somehow added up quite nicely. When we now move on, as already said, what for me is one of the biggest highlights this first half of the year is that we have a positive contribution from all three regions. This includes APAC as well. If you look at this, we are looking at organic growth volume-wise as well as price-wise.
We only have slightly lower sales because of the high FX impacts we are looking at. This is majorly China and Australia, obviously. Compared to the first half of last year, China developed really nicely. Our management team there has done a fantastic job really positioning us and repositioning us in the market, given the overcapacity we see there. We are back to very, very nice growth rates. The same holds for India and Australia, although Australia, especially the first quarter, was a little weaker due to the heat and the lower agricultural activity. This was partially at least compensated by high mining activity in the country. Compared to last year as well, we see a step up in terms of EBIT as well as EBIT margin. This story nicely continues looking at North and South America.
We're looking at organic growth rates as well with very good contributions, especially from the specialty lubricant business in the U.S., with a big contribution from our acquisition Nye , as well as very favorable development in Mexico. The high negative currency impacts, this is only partially U.S. dollar. A good portion of that is contributed by Argentina as well. Whilst our Argentina business is still very small, of course, high inflation accounting has basically its negative flip side on that too. So this is why we see a relatively high negative impact on top line. Major contributor to that would be the Argentine peso. But compared to last year, I think as well, very consistent picture, slightly lower sales only due to currency impact. So this is a translational impact only, no transactional effect. Much higher EBIT, so resulting in a much better EBIT margin.
Looking at how our net liquidity developed, I think most of that has already been said. Higher earnings after tax than we had at the same time this year, basically at the same point in time in 2023. CapEx is slightly behind expectations, but we believe that this gap will close throughout the course of the year. Net working capital, we are where we expected to be mid of this year. So we will see this Net working capital build up in terms of total value as well as in terms of percentage of revenue unwind throughout the rest of the year. And those other changes, I think very consistent picture too. This is majorly accruals and provisions for bonus payments and for tax payments. So given they're usually at their highest end of the year, most of that has been paid in the first half of the year.
Now we're slowly building up the provisions for 2024. This number will likely turn into positive throughout the remainder of the year. Of course, other impacts on net liquidity since December were the dividend we paid after our shareholder assembly as well as the share buyback. As just indicated, the share buyback will be concluded, and we will then basically be through with that. No additional big further cash out planned throughout the remainder of the year. To give you a little bit more insight into working capital, I think here you can see that quite nicely. We usually have the low point of working capital end of Q4, and we then see a sequential step up in Q1 and Q2, and then basically a further reduction in the second half of the year. This is what we've seen this year as well.
We are comfortable with that development and reiterate our free cash flow guidance since we expect the unwind effect we see every year in the second half of the year. If you look at the numbers, they are still relatively moderate. To remind you, we said we are guiding for a net working capital level on average in between 21%-22%. We are perfectly in line with that expectation. To give you a little bit insight on how pricing played out and how it developed. In Q2, combined with Q1, we saw a slight uptick in Group I and Group II in terms of base oil, while Group III is still slightly down. But we expect that to stabilize or even slightly pick up in the rest of the year.
I think same almost holds for additives and other raw materials we buy for production, although this is a relatively wide field given the number of materials we buy and the number of geographies we operate in. So this will be the picture, what we expect to happen in the second half of the year, pricing being stable or slightly up, really depending on the region, depending on the material we are looking at. But from what we see now, we do not expect any real spikes in terms of raw material costs, but rather a modest and flattish development. So putting all of what we've just heard together, I think we are very confident reiterating our guidance. Given that we are at half year, we hit the half year mark more or less in terms of sales and in terms of EBIT.
So despite the adverse environment and the macroeconomic conflicts we are all aware of, we are very confident to reiterate what we promised to deliver in March and what we reiterated in Q1 as well. In terms of free cash flow, this is the normal seasonal development. So we continue the guidance of slightly above 80% in terms of cash conversion towards EUR 250 million since we expect point one, the positive impact from the unwind of the working capital, and point two then the positive contribution come year end of the provisions for bonus accruals and for tax accruals. So all of this will contribute, and we are confident we can hit or possibly even exceed those targets come end of the year. And before we move into Q&A, some more update we promised to you in our Q1 call.
So we now fixed the location for our capital market day, which will take place in December. And we are delighted to announce that we will hold the capital market together with one of our strategically very important clients, DMG MORI. We will meet at their location, basically at their customer center in Pfronten, which is in the south of Germany, closest to Munich. Registration and more details will come soon. But please already block your calendars. We will have a dinner on December 4, and then the main event will take place together with DMG MORI on December 5. So having said this, I will hand back to Lutz, and we can start the Q&A session.
Yes. Thank you for that, Isabelle. And we can directly go into the Q&A. So moderation maybe, or please moderator, operator take over for the moderation of the Q&A session. Thank you.
Thank you. To ask a question, you will need to press star one and one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A queue. Our first question comes from the line of Michael Schaefer from ODDO BHF. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yeah, thanks for taking my three questions. The first one is on EMEA. I wonder whether you can shed a bit more color on, let's say, the key drivers behind the EBIT recovery despite the flat organic sales. So if I recall correctly, we had something like -7% organic decline in the first quarter, then it was flat now in the second. So how have volumes evolved primarily given that you have a very strong OEM exposure there?
Key drivers would be really helpful. The second one is on Americas, which looks like the key outperforming region. I wonder, we look for almost record margins in the second quarter in the Americas. If my math is right, then even record levels on a quarterly basis in terms of EBIT contribution in that region. You pointed to Nye and the Mexican business. How sustainable is what we have seen in the second quarter, in the upcoming quarter? This would be my second question. The third one is overall on your group seasonality. I recall previous calls where you basically pointed to the typical seasonality that the third quarter is the peak quarter of the year. Therefore, we should expect basically a ramp-up throughout the year. I wonder whether this is still valid and whether the seasonality picture you've provided before. Thankyou.
Yeah, thanks for your questions, Michael. Happy to shed a little bit more light into that. So looking into EMEA first, you asked for key drivers. So I think what is a very important statement to make is that FUCHS is much more than just OEM business, obviously, right? So we have a very diverse customer base. We are exposed to a lot of industries. And this is really what is helping us to grow in terms of volumes. So in total, EMEA volumes are up year over year compared to what we did last year. And I mean, of course, there's a lot of different contributors, a lot of different countries. So it's quite difficult to give you a general statement like what is the main industry or what is the main driver.
But what we can say is that EMEA found the same strength they had last year with good contributions for almost all countries. So of course, everybody's looking at Germany, and Germany is developing very nicely, especially in terms of price realization. But we have amazing contributions yet again from Poland, which is currently the fastest growing market we have in FUCHS for us. We have good contributions from Italy, from Spain, from the Nordics, from Great Britain, from South Africa. So really, I think across the board, all geographies, and then really playing out the strength, our exposure to so many different end markets. I think, of course, automotive industry is an important market, but it's not the only one. And when we look at automotive, we, of course, have quite a big portion of automotive aftermarket as well, which is independent from the auto production.
Because as long as a car is on the street, you need to exchange our products quite frequently. And this is, I think, really what makes the EMEA region that strong. Looking at Americas, if you ask me if this is sustainable development, for sure. But I mean, when you recover what we discussed in Q1, is that we said our specialty business is really strong. And this is majorly Nye , but ULTRACHEM and our normal specialty division as well. So this is performing really nicely. And especially for next year, we see a little bit more upside to that too. Because what we still see is that our normal, I would say, the bread and butter business we have for the metalworking or the industry business is doing okay.
But there's still this little wait and see mode to see really how the elections turn out and where investment should be made. So this is something we really expect to come back next year. And then last but not least, Mexico. I think we have a fantastic management team in Mexico who is very good at acquiring new customers and bringing in additional volumes. So there we see a growth where we believe this is sustainable. And especially if even more U.S. companies decide to invest in the U.S., we usually follow them. So we can have a good contribution there as well. In terms of profitability, so we are happy U.S. or Americas in total for that sake is back to the good margins. But this is, honestly speaking, nothing we haven't seen before.
So what I would rather like to frame it, they're back to old strength with the entire portfolio they have now, with a little wider geographical distribution with more legs to stand on. Plus, our procurement department in the U.S. has done a fantastic job, really including the U.S. and more corporate contracts so we can benefit from much better purchasing conditions than we could in the past. And regarding seasonality, for me, there wouldn't be any reason to say it's changed compared to previous years. So what we usually see is a ramp-up throughout Q1 up to Q3, but then usually a relatively weaker Q4 due to the Christmas break, to the China Golden Week break, Thanksgiving in the U.S., and so on and so forth. And this is what we would currently expect for the rest of the year too.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
We'll now move on to our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Martin Rödiger from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yes, hello. Good afternoon. I have also a few questions. Starting with the momentum in the second quarter, I saw that obviously volumes plus 3% Q2 while it was flattish in Q1. So obviously, there is an improvement. Do you see that already during the quarter, that month-over-month it's getting better and better? And that means also that at the beginning of Q3, what do you see in terms of demand? Is that trend, also the favorable trend, is that continuing at the beginning of the third quarter? That would be my first question. Secondly, coming back to the EBIT margin in Americas, which was quite strong. But I have the impression that the region is highly contrasted.
North America very strong, including the United States and Mexico. In South America, very weak because of Argentina. So would it be fair to say that there is a quite huge gap in profitability between North America and South America of, let's say, 1,000 basis points in EBIT margin? And the third question is on freight costs. You mentioned in your speech that they went down, I guess, also in Q2 year-over-year. But we hear right now that freight costs for container shipping are rocketing as we speak. Is that a concern for you? Thank you.
Thanks for your questions, Martin. So happy to shed a little bit more light on that. So I mean, I think we've seen a nice momentum in terms of volume growth, and this is what we invested into over the last couple of years.
So we are very happy we can finally start to harvest those fruit. In terms of momentum, month-over-month, it's a little difficult to say, honestly speaking, given the different number of working days in the month. We have national holidays, for example, a lot of national holidays in Europe in May. We've had the Easter break in March. We've had the Chinese New Year break in February. So it's a little bit difficult to really give you some kind of guidance in terms of month-over-month improvement. But what I can confirm, what we currently see in our order books and what we see, like how the market is developing in all of our big markets, it's a favorable development. And we expect that trend to continue throughout the rest of the year.
Although it's really difficult to say every month we're getting better because there are different things to consider. For example, now to come the summer vacation in a lot of days. So for some weeks, it will be a little slower. When we have upcoming, we have a Chinese Golden Week beginning of October. So there are so many facts to consider that we say we're confident to confirm that this trajectory of volume growth will continue from what we've seen in our order books. But it will not be sequential like every month more than the month before. There's some seasonality in there too. In terms of margins in the Americas, you're perfectly right. So of course, when you look at the numbers, I would say more than 90% of the Americas result is the region North America, which includes Canada, our three U.S. entities, and Mexico.
This is by far the strongest profit contributors for that reason. Looking at South America, I think to put that into perspective, our South America operations is very small. We only have bigger locations, or you can even call them bigger, in Brazil and in Argentina. I mean, if you read the newspaper, both of the countries are not in the most favorable macroeconomic environment and political environment for that matter. I think this is why it's fair to say that sales development as well as margin development is not as good in South America as in North America, where we have a much more stable environment to operate in and much more legs to stand on, honestly speaking, than in South America. Regarding freight costs, it's true they came down. You're correct as well that freight for container ships increased.
But luckily, I would say more than 90% of what we do is road and rail. So we are not really that much dependent on neither container ships nor air freight. And this, of course, you need to look into the different industries. But on average, this came down quite a bit in the first half of the year.
Thank you.
Thank you. We'll now move on to our next question. Our next question comes from the line of I sha Sharma from Stifel. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hi, good afternoon. I have two questions left, please. We saw a bit of volatility in terms of segment margins. So could you please help us reconcile regional trends that you saw from Q1 to Q2? We saw, of course, EBIT margin getting better in EMEA, but also Americas, whereas it was weaker in Asia.
How should we think about it in the second half and in that perspective for the full year, please? And then could you please also talk about what you see currently in the market into Q3 so far in terms of end mark ets and regions, please?
Yeah, sure. Happy to take that, Isha. So in terms of regional development, you're correct that overall we had a favorable development. But of course, just looking at margins, step up in EMEA versus Americas, while APEC was slightly down. But I think, I mean, major contributor to that was honestly normal seasonal effect. So the margin, especially in China, was stronger in Q1. But this is always the month or the time ramping up to Chinese New Year is usually the strongest month the entire year for China. And we had the entire January this year.
So this is just a normal seasonal development and not an indicator that we see a downturn or anything in the APEC region. And I think what we expect to see is very similar development to the years before. So hopefully another step up in the direction towards our target margin in Q3. And then historically, a little weaker margin in Q4 due to the fact that we will have holidays all over the world with Thanksgiving, with Christmas. We're usually looking at slightly lower volumes, lower sales compared to the other quarters, and thus a little lower margin. But this would be the expectation for all regions. And from what we've seen, there's nothing that we say one region is developing stronger or there's any cause for concern in the APEC region.
This is just the normal seasonality of Chinese New Year given how big a share China is in that region. What we currently see in Q3, I would say, is more or less continuing the trend we've seen in the last quarter. So I think very good development in all regions, good order intake. And I think, again, good contribution from a variety of different industries, especially, of course, the specialty segment we've mentioned a couple of times, which has exposure to semiconductors, to medical technology, to aerospace. We are now really looking forward to the contribution of the LUBCON Group because this gives us exposure to some very interesting end segments too, such as railway business, medical as well. But they are very strong in the building industries like MDF plates, cardboard boxes, all of that stuff, which will be very cool.
Automotive aftermarket has been performing really strong. Industry has grown nicely. So I think this is really what I would put in as basically our many legs to stand on, help us to continue this growth trajectory in almost all locations.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. We'll now move on to our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Rhea Kutteh from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hi, good afternoon. I've got two questions, please. My first one is a follow-up on a question before, and that's about the business development through the quarter. Can you give us an idea of the exit rate of the second quarter in terms of volumes? And more specifically, speak a little bit about June.
The reason I ask that leads to my second question, which is, can you give us a bit more detail on the drivers for FUCHS' volume growth that was mid-single-digit % in the second quarter relative to the Western European market for autos that was down double-digit % and seemed from the industry production data like it really deteriorated in June? And I appreciate that FUCHS has many different end markets and also didn't see a huge spike up when there was a strong autos market. But is there a reason that you think explains the divergence between the company's volumes and the underlying market? For example, are you gaining share or are there some bright spots end market-wise? And on a more midterm basis, would there be a reason why that business development wouldn't reflect the underlying market in that sense? Thank you.
Sure. Happy to take that on.
So a lot of questions. In terms of, I would say, business development, volume development, this has been relatively steady, I would say. So of course, April compared to the year before was a little stronger. But that, again, was just the Easter break. So the year before, it was in April. This year, it was in March. And then for May and June, I think we saw good order intake. And I couldn't really name one of the months that was stronger or that we saw a decline. And we see this nice trend now really continuing well into July. So there's nothing that you could say was slowing down in June, if even, I would say, we saw a mild pick up. Drivers of the volume is really from across the board, I would say, from a lot of different geographies into a lot of different end markets.
From that, honestly speaking, I wouldn't even exclude the auto market. Maybe to try to give some perspective on this. Of course, what we do is much more than just passenger cars and new car production. We have a lot of aftermarket business. This has grown really nicely in the first half of the year. The same is true for agricultural production, for trucks, for heavy-duty vehicles. While, of course, passenger car production was a little weaker, but not that we see that as a significant contributor to the business. On the other hand side, especially the specialty applications were really strong in the first half of the year. Medical technology, renewable energy, semiconductors, just to name a few. I think for us, this gives us very good confidence that we can continue this growth.
If you remember, especially last capital market day, we talked a lot about our segmentation approach so that we really strategically and in a very focused way start to look at end markets, start to understand what our position is, how big the market potential is, and just use what we already know how to do in the group in different countries. And I think this is what you can see now as well. So those are the fruits we now harvest in terms of just somehow copy and paste what we've done in other markets already to new locations. And this is what is giving us a lot of tailwind in what is the difficult environment. But I mean, as you rightfully said, so even when the auto market was up, we didn't profit from it as much as you would have expected.
The same as now, passenger cars are down. But for us, it's not, I would say, a market that is big enough to really have an impact on the entire FUCHS Group, and especially not overshadowing all of the effort we put into the segmentation approach, the development of the specialty business, and basically the broad base we can grow from in terms of automotive too.
Thanks. That's really helpful. I've just got one follow-up question, please. And that's on looking forward into Q3 and beyond. I know the company has got some pretty close relationships, especially with the German auto OEMs on the first-fill business. So can you give us any color or anecdotal information on what your key customers are saying about volumes going into the third quarter and beyond?
There's been news articles and anecdotal evidence from other places in the markets that say that there might be extended summer shutdowns that might be an impact on the Q3 production rates. So just wanted to hear what your thoughts are and what your conversations with your customers suggest. Thank you.
So I think from, I mean, from what I can share and what we hear in the market when we talk to our customers, of course, I mean, the atmosphere is not bullish and they're not overly ambitious. But we do not see huge reductions in volumes yet. So the order books are still filled pretty well. Of course, a little slower than what we've seen in the last two years, especially when they were still working on getting rid of the backlog. But from what we currently see, the market is still pretty much intact.
And I mean, you cannot forget that when we talk to the OEMs, we do a lot of what we call genuine brand or white label business for them as well, which is what they use in their shops. And this business is still running really nicely. So I think overall, the market is in shape quite well.
Okay. That's really helpful. Thanks so much.
Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one and one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. Our next question comes from the line of Konstantin Wiechert from Baader Helvea. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yeah. Hi. Thanks, Isabelle, for taking my question. If I may, you talked a lot about right now about the OEMs.
I see I have another one on that. I think you invested increasingly amounts of R&D into also products for your battery electric vehicles, especially in the high-performance area. So I would just wonder if there would be any slowdown, further slowdown from what we currently heard in the first half in Europe so far, how that would impact maybe your midterm growth projections if rates of or if the share of ICE stays longer than previously expected and shares of electric vehicles consequently lower. Maybe also second one, you also again expressed confidence on the APEC region for the third quarter. Nonetheless, I think that was also a sizable part of your bridge to your 25 EBIT target.
So if you could also give some more color here how you currently see the consumer behavior in China and whether that still looks for you like this part of the bridge can be achieved from the APEC region or whether that's becoming more challenging?
For sure. Happy to shed some light on that, Konstantin. So I mean, you're right. We invested quite a bit of R&D work and especially strategy alignment work and how do we want to position ourselves for e-mobility. But openly speaking, we are happy as long as the number of cars sold goes up. And we don't really mind what kind of drivetrain we are talking about. So if it's an ICE, battery electric car, even fuel cell. So we have products that go into all of those cars. So as long as the number of cars is going up, we are good.
What we currently see, especially in Europe and the U.S. and the more mature market, is, as you rightfully said, the number of cars, of e-cars, not picking up as fast as everybody would have wished for. This is a lot of infrastructure restrictions, not enough energy available, what have you. For us, honestly speaking, it's nothing to concern about given, I mean, we have products in all of those drivetrains. We have a lot of aftermarket business, which go away much slower than the first-fill business, obviously. So I think we are in a very good position. And I think to add to that, of course, we are in a lucky position compared to a lot of other tier one, tier two suppliers that we do not really need to have a lot of CapEx and adjust our machine park out production lines for e-mobility.
I mean, look at it like this. We are a batch manufacturer for something like the EDFs or the thermal fluids. We can use the same production lines we already have for engine oils, for gear oils right now. So it's really just a question of batches coming in, maybe small tank here and there for new products, but that's basically it. So we have a much higher flexibility due to our low, basically our low value equation we have in-house. Given we just buy the products, we then blend for those kind of applications. So for us, I mean, either way, as long as the number of cars and the car population is growing, we are very happy about that development. Looking at the APEC region, I mean, that's a big region with a lot of different trends in all the countries. Maybe let's pick out the biggest three.
So I think in China, I think everybody knows it's not as easy to do business in China anymore as it used to be pre-COVID. But I think now really our strategy of in China for China with a very strong independent management team has really paid off. So they managed to win over a lot of new domestic business. And we are currently starting with an initiative on key account management for the big Chinese players, especially in the e-mobility and the wind market. So for us, this has turned out really nicely. But I think you're right. So I think consumer behavior and consumer sentiment in China is still a little depressed. And they're suffering from overcapacity. But this is why a lot of those Chinese players are now looking to expand and to internationalize. And we are currently positioning ourselves as partners for them to do so.
So what we currently see is more the role of China shifting towards in China for China, from in China for the world to help us develop those markets and those accounts when, for example, BYD, now everybody knows that, expands their factories to Mexico and Hungary, that we can be their partners and be there with them to support them with those ambitious plans. What we currently see is that we have nice growth rates in India as well. So of course, still significantly smaller than China. But in terms of growth, it's our fastest growing country we see over the last couple of years in that region. And for us, looking into the future, this will be a more and more interesting market too.
I think we are really happy that we now added another small factory in India with a LUBCON acquisition so we can really be closer to the market than we could before that. Then to complete the big three in the APEC market, I think Australia mining activity is still pretty much intact. So for us, given that most of the business we have in Australia is mining business, it's a nice growth driver for the future as well. So I'm still very confident with the APEC contribution we had in our midterm strategy.
All right. Thank you so much.
Thank you. We'll now move on to our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Oliver Schwarz from Warburg Research. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen. Just one question from my side.
I'm wondering about the contribution of holding consolidation, which came down quite a bit from last year's numbers. Is there probably something amiss when it comes to who contributed what? Because that coincides a bit with the huge increase in profitability in the U.S. And given your recent acquisition, last year's acquisition there, you stated that you want to export more from the U.S. to other regions. So what is the mechanic behind that? That would be my question. Thank you very much.
Thanks for your question, Oliver. So first time, very easy answer to that. So what we show is really segment results. So all of the intercompany profits that are within one region are already eliminated, but not, rightfully said, for example, when we deliver from the U.S. to China.
The main impact behind that was just higher elimination of intercompany profits in our inventories and our warehouses. We expect that number to come down by year end too. I would say major contributor was really the internationalization of the Nye business. Formally, most of that was driven out of the U.S. As we saw that it developed so nicely in the U.S., we said, "Okay, the local management teams need to be more in charge." We shipped inventories to other locations, like China especially, but like Germany too. Those still sit in the inventories partially. As you can imagine, nice margin development, nice intercompany margin development too. This is actually the only influence factor there.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. We'll now move on to our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Anil Shenoy from Barclays. Please go ahead. Y our line is open
Hi. Good morning. Just a couple of questions, please. First question is on raw material prices. Now, they've been very volatile between 2020 to 2023. But in the last few quarters, they haven't seemed to move a lot. And FUCHS' earnings have become much more predictable now. You even stopped giving the graph in the presentation where you give the prices for each of the base oils now. So are we to understand that we have reached a stage where we can now stop worrying about the base oil or additive prices and assume that if there is a 5%, 10% kind of a change, then it'll be offset with higher prices? So that's the first question. Second question is on seasonality that we can expect in Q3. Last year, we saw a 16% jump in EBIT from Q2 to Q3.
The jump was pretty much in all of the regions. So is there a chance that we can expect that kind of a jump between Q2 to Q3 in 2024 as well? Thank you.
Thanks for your questions, Anil. So regarding raw material pricing, well, I think this is the $1 million question anyways. So I think, I mean, what we've seen in especially 2021 and 2022 was unprecedented with the 70% price increase in only 18 months. And this is when we started to plot the graph to somehow guide you a little bit how pricing developed. And you could see really ups and downs all over the place. So what we've seen in the last couple of months or even quarters is that we are back to a more normal situation. But still, of course, prices are still on a very high level currently.
This is why, to be fair, I think nobody right now can give you any real guidance if that's it now and we're in a more normal new situation where prices will somehow relax a little more at one point in time. I think from what we've seen over the last, let's say, last 4 or 5 quarters, we are back to a much more normal development than where we've been in 2021 and 2022, given that we rather see developments of, let's say, like 2%, 3%, 4% up and down, but not those huge spikes of 15% here, 20% there anymore. We somehow expect at least start this year that this kind of trend will continue, maybe a slight uptick, but not crazy double-digit growth rates again.
And this is why we said at one point in time, this graph we started to plot in the beginning of 2022 became meaningless because you had those huge spikes and suddenly everything else was flat. So as soon as we see any new developments that we are worth reporting, we might think about how to change that going forward in terms of how we report on it. In terms of seasonality Q2 to Q3, so you're correct that we usually see a step up in Q3, although I think last year was really extraordinary when you look at the step up, especially driven by China for sure. I mean, given that the first half of the year was still comparatively weak with everybody trying to bounce back to COVID and trying to navigate the new normal, but we had some swings and roundabouts in other regions too.
So I think we are expecting a step up, but not order of magnitude the same percentage as we saw last year, because otherwise any guidance would be a little shaky, obviously.
Thank you. We'll move to our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Martin Rödiger from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yes. Just a follow-up question. Based on your charts you have provided in the past, your sales to the highway vehicle manufacturers is 15%, and this is cars and trucks. And your exposure to vehicle components manufacturers that are tier one to two clients is 18%. But they also supply products to the car industry. So I would like to understand what is your exposure to OEM cars if you combine your direct sales and your indirect sales?
So I mean, I think it hasn't really changed in the long run. So we usually look at that. We say we have something like 40%-45% of our total sales go to the automotive industry. Maybe we say roughly half of that heavy duty, half of that passenger cars. But this includes obviously everything from first fill, from really tier one, tier two, where we have a lot of specialty greases, to automotive aftermarket with our own aftermarket brands, as well as the private label, the white label business. So I think this hasn't changed compared to the last few years.
The reason I'm asking was to figure out to which extent your aftermarket business performed so well that it compensates for the weak OEM business.
I mean, Martin, our, as we say, really passenger car business, roughly 20% of our sales, which includes aftermarket business. And still, I mean, of course, passenger car business is a little weaker, but it's not down completely. And you cannot forget we are operating in a lot of different regions. For example, when you look at China, the volumes are up currently from what we see. And this, I think, taking all of that into account is where we are not suffering as much from what everybody is talking about than some people would anticip ate.
Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Well, thank you.
Thank you. There are no further questions at this time, so I'll hand the call back to Lutz for any closing remarks.
Yeah. Thank you for your participation. With this, we have come to the end of today's conference call.
If there are any more questions left, don't hesitate to contact me. Otherwise, we speak next time when we release the Q3 figures, which is on October 30. Until then, have a nice summer, and you may now disconnect.
This concludes today's conference call.