Good morning everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, we are providing an update on our Q3 performance and outlook for the remainder of 2026. BetMGM delivered another quarter of controlled, disciplined execution. Our Q3 performance was driven by a strong summer and a solid start to football season, seeing us on track to hit our full-year targets. Importantly, our underlying business fundamentals and player value metrics continue to be healthy, supporting positive cash flow and adjusted EBITDA. While it's Gary and me on the call with you today, I want to recognize that our performance is only made possible with the dedication and drive our BetMGM colleagues show every day. So a big thank you to all of our BetMGMers, as well as the support provided by both of our parent companies.
Q3 delivered net revenue of $710 million, and that's up 7% year-over-year and generated adjusted EBITDA of $86 million. The quarter benefited from a strong July, including the World Cup, and solid performances in both August and September, including encouraging player engagement during the first month of the football season. I will talk about our Q3 performance in more detail in a moment, but let me give you a headline summary first. iGaming continued to deliver top-line growth supported by our ongoing player management efforts and differentiated content. In online sports, Q3 delivered year-on-year growth in both handle and player values. Despite the highly competitive operating environment, we are pleased with our performance through the initial weeks of the NFL season, with pre-season enhancements to our sportsbook meaningfully improving the customer experience.
As we've previously highlighted, the competitive environment remains intense, particularly due to significant investments by unregulated and illegal operators offering sports betting. Consistent with our strategy, we've remained nimble and disciplined, leaning into BetMGM's strengths and where we can achieve the most attractive returns. This has seen us increase our focus on iGaming, multi-product states, Nevada, and most recently Alberta, as well as higher-value, higher-staking players, particularly in OSB, while also reducing investment in certain lower-return OSB-only markets. This more targeted approach is working. Our continued optimization of media channels, geographic targeting, and marketing mix is driving strong customer acquisition at attractive ROIs. Across both iGaming and online sports, player values continue to improve as we maintain our focus on value over volume. We're delighted that in Q3, our approach delivered higher than expected first-time depositors while maintaining some of the strongest paybacks we've seen all year.
We're also encouraged by the early performance of several growth initiatives, including our launch in our newest multi-product market, Alberta. In Alberta, we're seeing attractive ROIs and per-player metrics, with several KPIs trending better than those post-Ontario's launch. We're also pleased with the early success of our Borgata brand relaunch. In fact, in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, where our Borgata app is live, average daily actives are up 28% versus our pre-launch benchmark in February of this year. Alongside our continued enhancements to product and content, Alberta and the refreshed Borgata brand strengthen our position as we look to the remainder of 2026 and beyond. As I mentioned earlier, our Q3 performance puts us on track to deliver our full-year 2026 guidance.
We continue to expect net revenue between $2.9 billion- $3.1 billion and adjusted EBITDA between $300 million- $350 million, with both anticipated toward the lower end of their respective ranges. This is consistent with our guidance post-Q2 results. We remain laser-focused on delivering profitable, sustainable growth and EBITDA, and we believe our year-to-date performance is evidence of that commitment and the success of our strategy. Accordingly, we continue to see a path to $500 million of adjusted EBITDA sometime beyond 2027. Those are the highlights. Now let me provide more detail on our Q3 performance by segment. Our iGaming business generated $483 million of net revenue in Q3, and that is up 6% year-over-year. NGR per active increased 4%, while active players grew 2% during the quarter.
As many of you know, approximately 70% of our business comes from iGaming, and we remain focused on strengthening our differentiated offering here. Our market-leading content strategy remains a key driver of our iGaming performance. During Q3, we debuted our new Game of Thrones franchise in the U.S., following its successful Canadian rollout last quarter. This has been our most successful game launch of all time across our markets, and we are excited to introduce additional titles within the franchise over the coming months. Of course, all exclusive to BetMGM. We also launched our progressive SideBet Jackpot feature in Michigan and West Virginia, giving customers additional ways to win while playing eligible casino games. We expect to introduce the feature in all our gaming markets through the remainder of the year. In New Jersey, we released a new live-streamed slots experience in partnership with Awager.
The experience combines the convenience of digital play with the authenticity of land-based slot machines. Lastly, we also launched several sports-branded casino games ahead of the NFL season, including content connected with our new multi-year partnership with the Minnesota Vikings, which we know will be particularly enjoyed by our Canadian players in Ontario and Alberta. Turning to Sports, online sports generated $216 million of net revenue in the third quarter, and that is up 7% year-on-year, while retail sports generated $11 million, and that is up 5% year-over-year. It is worth noting that year-on-year comparisons for OSB in Q3 are impacted by sports calendar differences, with this year including the World Cup in July, but also having one fewer weekend of NFL and college football activity in September.
Digesting this calendar point, OSB handle grew 3% in the third quarter, and more importantly, player engagement and player value metrics remained attractive, particularly among the high-value customers at the center of our premium mass strategy. Handle per active was up 13% year-over-year, while NGR per active grew 18%. As expected, average monthly actives were down 9%, consistent with our continuing refinement of our player base as we focus on player value over volume. Some more detail on the sportsbook enhancements I mentioned. We significantly improved speed, stability, and responsiveness of the app. We also expanded cash out and bet tracking capabilities, expanded smarter betting insights, provided more ways to build customizable bets, as well as improved our rewards hub. September saw strong reactivations among high-value customers, demonstrating the effectiveness of this focused approach.
We have also seen a continued increase in bet mix from parlays and SGPs, which has driven a slight uptick of our margin. However, our Sports business continues to face competitive pressures from both regulated and unregulated operators. We expect these dynamics to persist at least into mid-2027. We will remain agile, adjusting our operating and capital allocation plans accordingly. Despite these headwinds, the underlying fundamentals of the business remain healthy. Our lower player count is entirely as expected and reflects our intentional decisions around customer acquisition and marketing investment. Each active customer is contributing greater handle and NGR, with our pullback in OSB-only marketing, also generating operating efficiencies and improving our unit economics. We are also encouraged by the continued benefits of our omni-channel proposition in Nevada, with OSB handle growing at 8% in the quarter.
As we look ahead, we are excited for the heart of the NFL season in Q4. We continue to manage the business with discipline, investing behind our most valuable customers and strongest markets, while continuously adapting to the competitive environment. Moving on to our financials. As mentioned, Q3 net revenue was $710 million, generating adjusted EBITDA of $86 million. As a reminder, we began paying parent fees to Entain and MGM Resorts earlier this year for licenses and services provided to BetMGM. These fees are recorded in our P&L as an operating expense and are calculated as a percentage of revenue. For Q3, we are paying $18 million to our parents for parent fees. BetMGM's other avenue of returning cash to its parents is through cash distributions. In addition to the parent fees of $18 million, we distributed $50 million.
Therefore, total cash to parents for the third quarter was $68 million. These payments demonstrate the continued cash-generating capacity of the business. In summary, Q3 was a pleasing start to the second half of the year. BetMGM enjoyed a strong late summer and a solid start to the NFL season, and our underlying player fundamentals for both sides of the business continued to be healthy. Execution of our strategy is working. We are putting full force behind BetMGM's areas of strength and where we generate the most attractive long-term returns, while at the same time continuing to optimize marketing investment and drive operating efficiencies all across the business. We are therefore pleased to reaffirm our full-year guidance and remain confident in our ability to drive sustainable, profitable growth and return cash to our parents this year and beyond.
With that, I thank you, and I will hand over to the operator to open the line for questions.
As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. We do ask that you limit yourself to one question only in order to enable as many people to participate as possible. Please stand by while we compile the Q and A roster. Our first question is from the name of Ed Young of Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question. Ed Young of Morgan Stanley, please proceed with your question. We will move on to our next analyst, and we will come back to you if we can. Thank you. Our first question is from Jordan Bender of Citizens. Jordan, please proceed with your question.
Everyone, good morning, and thanks for the question. Adam, Gary, I am looking at promos both for iGaming and Sports Betting. I am looking at that as a percentage of GGRs now increased for the last couple of quarters. Albeit maybe Alberta is maybe having an impact in the 3Q. As you continue to fight for players in now fairly mature states, how do you think about the catalysts of actually starting to bring the promotional intensity within your business down moving forward? Thank you.
Hello. Firstly, thank you for the first question. I am happy we got the tech working. Your observations are absolutely right. The competitive environment has been, over the recent months, really challenging, very competitive. We have seen some new entrants some months ago now, but the impact on the market remains elevated, particularly in iGaming. Some new entrants to some of our iGaming states. We have also, as you say, had the launch of Alberta. We have had the latter stages of the World Cup. So there have been what I would consider one-off or not sustainable events which have had an impact on that promo level. Having said that, this year versus last year, we have invested a little bit more into players at the start of the season.
We should actually see the balance between marketing and promo shift over time as our focus increasingly is on our retained base of players and fewer new players. As I say, so a number of factors to consider. One-off events in this year, the fact that we have invested more concertedly at the beginning of the season. We think over time, our GGR promo level should ease from current levels, but not massively so.
Great. Thank you very much.
Your next question is from Ben Shelley of UBS. Ben, please proceed with your question.
Hi. Good morning, and thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to ask about iGaming market growth. It looks like the U.S. iGaming market slowed a little bit in August. Judging by Q3, did September then accelerate? More broadly, how are you thinking about the growth outlook for the U.S. iGaming market from here? Thank you.
Yes, it does seem that the market data indicates, as you say, Ben, that August was slower. We have been very happy with how September went for BetMGM, and our momentum has continued into October. I think if there is the outlier from the seats we're sitting in, the outlier is August.
Thanks very much.
Good.
Your next question is from Barry Jonas of Truist. Barry, please proceed with your question.
Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my question. Following the recent CFTC verbiage on a prediction market casino product, I am curious if you see that as no longer a risk now. Just general thoughts there. Thank you.
What an interesting question, Barry. I do not think it is no longer a risk. I think if anything, the risk has been stayed for some time. I think what is happening now is cosmetics in pursuit of survival. I am very much looking forward to this whole ambiguity being clarified by the Supreme Court. The overwhelming majority of cases being now determined in favor of states and AGs and tribes, we expect that outcome from the Supreme Court. We hope to see that in the 2026, 2027 session. I think to the extent prediction markets survive, I think it is just a matter of time before the casino-like products reemerge in some other incarnation or some other form. Just as easily as the rules were made or are being attempted to be made now, they can be undone and changed in the future.
I think the key test is whether this was the intent of Congress, and I think that will be shown to not be the case.
Thank you very much.
Good.
Your next question is from Ed Young of Morgan Stanley. Ed, please proceed with your question.
Hello, can you hear me?
Hello, Ed. Yes.
He is back.
Back.
Wonderful. Look at that. We made it work. Adam, you spoke about lowering investment in your low-return areas, which has been a theme for some time and obviously contributed to the really strong drop-through you have seen on incremental revenue. Essentially, everything has gone to the bottom line this quarter. How do you think about the balance there of what you reinvest back into growth momentum versus what you are achieving at the moment? How do you get the balance right, particularly given on a market level and for your business, we are seeing iGaming, which is obviously your mainstay decelerating, whether we are looking at that on an overall basis or on a per active basis. How do you calibrate that, and how should we think about that as you go through Q4 forward into 2027?
Yep. Thanks for the question, Ed. Look, we think about these things distinctly between acquisition and retention. On acquisition, we have our response curves, a lot of work done on efficiency of spend. We talk a lot about the deliberate flexibility that we have in how we allocate capital in the world of marketing, focused on acquisition. The north star is payback periods, ROI. We drive that obviously in two ways. One is how much it costs us to acquire a player, and then, of course, tracking their value over time. We are continuing to invest in two parts of that. Obviously, one, optimize and reduce the cost of acquiring a player, and then, of course, looking after our players to drive the return side of that equation.
Now, what's been very good for us in recent weeks, in fact, since back end of the World Cup, is the acquisition environment has, for BetMGM, improved a lot. So our CPAs have meaningfully reduced, and our predicted returns, as measured in months to pay back, we haven't seen returns this favorable, frankly, for months and months, since the beginning of the year, back end of last year. So the acquisition environment is favorable, and we will continue to invest as long as the returns are attractive. On the retention side, it's really just a manifestation of our strategy, the execution of our strategy. We are putting money, we are reinvesting in player retention. As our states mature, we are hyper-focused on making sure that we look after our premium players in both sports and gaming. That's it. This question of under-investing, we spend no time thinking about it.
We are driving towards positive outcomes and efficiency of spend and the most efficient capital allocation, and that's how we run the business for both acquisition and retention. So your question around the lower investment and have we— I think it's have we gone too far, and we don't believe we have. Our north star is profitable revenue growth over time, generate cash and EBITDA for our shareholders, and that's what we're executing against, and it seems to be successful. As I said, the external environment seems to be more favorable to BetMGM today than it's been for some time.
Look, remember, we've been at this for seven, eight years now. We've figured out the tools and methods that make marketing more efficient. So some of the reduction is just from our wisdom over time.
Look—
Very useful. Thank you both.
Just to punctuate, Ed, and this is an important point. Notwithstanding quarters now, quarters under our belts of progressively easing marketing investment, our market share has remained really solid. Coming out of 2025, our record-breaking 2025, our market share in both sports and gaming has remained at 8% and 20% respectively. I think that is testimony to the achievement and the efficiency, the effectiveness of our marketing drive for marketing efficiency. We have been able to maintain market position while spending a lot less, and that is the recipe for our future profitability.
Understood. Thank you.
Our next question is from Joe Stauff of Susquehanna. Joe, please proceed with your question.
Good morning, Adam. I wanted just to ask a refresh question in terms of the percentage of your iCasino actives that also bet on sports. Is it fair to assume, I guess, at this point that Nevada really is your largest, say, customer acquisition pathway for new sports customers.
Sorry, Joe, I've got the first question, which was around iGaming OSB cross-sell. I didn't hear the second part that was Nevada. Would you mind repeating that, please?
Yeah, of course. On Nevada, it seems as though, outside of likely Alberta, Nevada is really the biggest source of new customer acquisitions, obviously originating in sports, and then obviously you manage those based on the source markets that they come from. Will Nevada continue to be the biggest area of acquisition of new customers going forward for you?
Got it. Okay. First question is about cross-sell. In a regular week, about 55%-60% of our sports players also enjoy playing in our gaming side of the business. In reverse, it's about 15%-20% of our iGamers first also participate in OSB. So that's the two-way view. On the Nevada question, it continues to be, as I think I mentioned off the Q2 results, we generate thousands of new registrations and first-time depositors on a weekly basis out of Nevada. As you say, they go back to their source markets as they do. Nevada will continue. I see no meaningful slowdown on that rate of acquisition. Now, of course, repeat visitors to Nevada should, in theory, reduce that potential base of new first-time depositors over time. We're not seeing that in a meaningful way yet.
We are still seeing very healthy new player acquisition from Nevada. As to whether or not that will continue to be the biggest source of traffic. In isolation, it is not our largest source of traffic. In isolation, we will recruit directly in our multi-product states. We are actively recruiting directly for premium mass OSB through the myriad channels that are available to us. Nevada, while important, is only a component of our long-term acquisition strategy.
Thank you.
Got it.
Our next question is from John DeCree of CBRE. John, your line is now open. Please go ahead. John DeCree with CBRE, please proceed with your question. We will move on with our next analyst and try to come back. Our next question is from Charlie Muir-Sands with BNP Paribas. Charlie, please proceed with your question.
Thank you very much. Good morning, guys. Adam, thank you for taking my questions. It is Charlie from BNP Paribas. I have questions on the newer competition, the prediction markets. Firstly, your improvement in customer acquisition costs you said you have seen since the latter stages of the World Cup. I think previously you flagged that things were becoming tougher because of increased marketing spend by rivals, including the prediction markets. Is it an easing off of the competition on spend that is making that more efficient? On those, a couple of the leading players have, well, at least Kalshi had to implement geo-blocking in a couple of states now. I just wondered since that has been put in place, whether you had seen any particular change in competitive trend in those markets where they are no longer able to operate. Thank you.
Thanks, Charlie. You rightly reference some of my comments earlier in the year around the impact of prediction markets spend. The first observation is that there has been no change in prediction market spend. Prediction markets continue to spend heavily in the category. I know what we are seeing now is more a function of the work that we are doing day to day, week to week, month to month at BetMGM. It is a testament to our marketing strategy. Our marketing strategy, as I have said before, I think, is that we want to remain as flexible as possible to respond to market conditions as they evolve and change over time. The distortion that has been introduced and remains by prediction markets is just one of the macro factors that we have to respond to.
Credit to the team, they have absolutely done exactly that, looking for new pockets of opportunity, looking for unexplored areas that have been less impacted by the prediction markets. The impact on our CPAs and payback periods have been very gratifying. I think what it demonstrates is that, I do not want to say in too emphatic terms, but what it demonstrates is that almost regardless of what happens in the external environment, we will find a way. That is what we are demonstrating now. Now to the second part, which is around the impact of geo-blocking. Nevada is a good example. Nevada is a difficult example, however, because there are some nuances to the Nevada market around how players sign up, where you are able to sign up, which mean that the impact is not as linear, is not as direct.
As a result of that, it is a difficult question to respond to with any degree of clarity. I do expect, however, the directional impact to be positive. Nevada is not alone. We see a number of other states, as you have been following, a number of other states which are going to follow the ninth circuit and the sixth circuit rulings. We should see a progressive reduction of the addressable TAM for prediction markets as we wait for the Supreme Court to decide whether to take the case or not.
Great. Many thanks.
Our next question is from John DeCree with CBRE. John, please proceed with your question.
Hi, everyone. Can you hear me now?
You are back.
Hey, John.
Oh, wonderful. Sorry about that. A question, Adam, on iGaming exclusive content. You highlighted it a few times and of course on past calls, being a key differentiator for you. I know SideBet in more states coming, Game of Thrones successful launch, but could you speak a little bit to pipeline in iGaming, how much kind of exclusive content you'd expect to deploy over the next 12 months? Or really just some insight into what you're thinking the product roadmap for iGaming and content looks like over, say, the next 12 months or so.
Yes. So thank you for that. As you'd expect, it's something that is particularly competitively sensitive. What I will say is we had a BetMGM Board meeting just last week, and there was a whole section of the presentation dedicated to this topic. How we make our iGaming business better, stronger. One of the critical components, of course, is our content strategy. We have a very rich pipeline. At BetMGM, we own the category of entertainment. October is legendary spook month, so we're leaning into the Halloween theme this month. Really, we're following seasonal moments and building around those seasonal moments with our content offering. You rightly called out Game of Thrones. We've talked about the success of that game. We have follow-ons to that game coming. We've just launched The Traitors in one of our markets. SideBet Jackpot is proving to be very attractive to our players.
We don't have it rolled out in all of our states. It's only now live in two of our states. So before the end of the year, we should see improved impact of that product. It's a high-margin product relative to our aggregate margin in gaming, so that should offer a lift. But it's not just content, and this is the important part that I wanted to share also. It's not just content. We've got a lot of improvement still ahead in relation to speed and stability, the navigation experience, the discovery experience, the personalization and recommendation engine. All of these areas we have plans in the very near term to make progress against. So while our content strategy is very much one of the anchors of our differentiation strategy in iGaming, we have a lot of goodness coming around that.
Fantastic. Thanks, Adam.
Sure.
Our next question is from Ben Chaiken with Mizuho. Ben, please proceed with your question.
Hey, how is it going? Thanks for taking my question. Maybe another follow-up on costs. You hit the marketing point fairly well in a prior question. I would like to talk about the contribution profit, though, which sits above the marketing expense, I believe, and flow-through was close to 100% there. Is that an area you see as having more leverage, or are there items specific in the quarter? I also bring this up because I believe that is where the $ 18 million parent fees would sit, presumably, to get it.
Gary?
Thank you.
Yeah. Gary, would you mind?
Yeah, sure. We put the parent fees actually below in G&A when we looked at it that way. Remember, we are moving the parent fees out of the adjusted EBITDA anyways when we look at it from an adjusted EBITDA standpoint. For the operating cost, the general operating cost, it is a tough environment in some ways. We have managed to get some reductions in our payment costs as a percentage of revenue, but those are always hard-fought. There is a tension in the business between having flexibility for customers and them then using that flexibility to move money in and out of the platform, which can drive up costs. So our unit costs on payments have gone down, but sometimes that can be undone by some of the movement velocity in and out.
We have data fees, we have content fees, as Adam was just talking about with the casino content. We have a world in which sometimes our fees will go up as a result of the exclusive content. Sports data, it is not something that tends to go down in cost very often. Taxes tend to be going upwards rather than downwards. So when you get into the blunt parts of the direct costs, it is a battle to get leverage there. We do find operating leverage in terms of staffing and where AI will take us, and some of our work on promotional, how we optimize across states can drive some better improvements on taxes as a percentage of revenue. In this quarter, the overall flow-through is being driven by the reduction in marketing compared to last year.
We expect even into next year, we will see some of the benefit from changes in the marketing strategy.
Okay, thanks.
Our next question is from Pravin Gondhale of Barclays. Pravin, please proceed with your question.
Hello, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I would like to revisit the full year EBITDA guidance here. You clearly flagged your discipline on promotional and marketing spending there. Could you talk about the other components of the higher EBITDA drop through implied in your full-year guidance for FY 2026? Is the previous decided around 40%-50% EBITDA drop through guidance still holds true for outer years? Thank you.
Starting with the latter point, yes, the sort of low 40s is a run rate, all things being equal, target on flow through. As we've had different moments where we've stepped down our investment in marketing, that's caused an increase in the flow through, which we've now seen for a couple of different periods in a row. The other benefits we're getting to drop through this year is we have had some efficiencies on payment processing. We've had a couple other things just in our operating costs, some of the minor gains and the ones I was just talking about on the last answer. The big driver of the high flow through this year is our year-over-year stepped out of the marketing costs.
As Adam said at the up top, we feel comfortable that the guidance we have given and what we have seen in the health of our cohort so far this year and where we are going into fourth quarter, we are in a good place to meet the guidance.
Thank you. This is very clear. Thank you.
Our next question is from Sam Nielsen of JP Morgan. Sam, please proceed with your question.
Hey, thanks for taking our question, and congrats on a strong quarter. Could you talk about what you have seen maybe from a handle growth perspective for the NFL season thus far and maybe kind of your latest thoughts on any change in PM cannibalization there?
We've seen small year-over-year increases in handle. We've also seen small upticks in the bet mix to a favorable margin profile. We had a big sort of first four weeks in terms of hold for the house on the NFL, which has a suppressive impact on handle because there's less recycling, so now we have to look the numbers through. This last weekend was our first sort of bad house results weekend of the year, which I expect we'll see some increase in handle as a result. But it's been similar with the rest of the year in terms of the handle growth. As Adam alluded to in the remarks, we have a value over volume approach to the player management. We've seen upticks in our NGR per active, but we've seen year-over-year declines in the number of players in the book for Sports.
That increase in revenue is coming from higher handle per active.
Look, Sam, just to add to that.
Thank you very much.
I'm delighted with the handle performance. Let's step back and put things into context. We have meaningfully reduced investment directly in OSB marketing, player acquisition, and this is a few quarters mature now, this approach, as you know. That notwithstanding, we've seen in Q3 handle growth at BetMGM, despite both reduction in marketing indirectly towards OSB and the prevalence and growth in investment of prediction markets. We're really pleased, actually, with the shape of continued momentum as well as the resilience of our business.
Makes a lot of sense. Good luck.
Thank you.
Our final question comes from Richard Stuber with Deutsche Bank. Richard, please proceed with your question.
Thank you. Good morning. Just a quick one from me on Alberta. It has been live for most of the quarter. Can you just quantify how much impact that had on both revenue and EBITDA this quarter? Presumably, it was still loss-making. Secondly, what would the annualized impact of live in Alberta be? Thank you.
Well, let me start with this. For the first quarter it was live, it has a negligible impact on revenue and sports. It has probably 2 percentage points of growth impact on the iGaming business. From an acquisition standpoint, about 20% of the new players we acquired in Q3 were from Alberta, so we have had a really good burst out of the gates there. We modeled in our own forecast for Alberta to sort of mimic a trajectory takeoff that we had in Ontario a few years back. We have ramped up faster and higher than that trajectory, so that is positive. We are exceeding our daily targets. We are all good there. In terms of the longer-term outlook, obviously that will grow. We will see what we are going to look at for next year at this point.
Thank you.
Sure.
Thank you. That concludes the Q and A session. I will now turn the call over to Adam for his closing remarks. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. Thank you all for joining us today. We are very pleased with our Q3 results, and we look forward to a strong finish to 2026. We remain focused on disciplined execution, profitable growth, and building long-term shareholder value. Once again, thank you for your time. Thank you for joining us, and we look forward to reconnecting next year. Have a great rest of day. Bye-bye.
This concludes today's business update. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.