Ladies and gentlemen, good day and Welcome to HDFC Bank Limited Q2 FY 2027 earnings conference call on the financial results presented by the management of HDFC Bank. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during this conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star then zero on your touch-tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Srinivasan Vaidyanathan, Chief Financial Officer, HDFC Bank. Thank you, and over to Mr. Vaidyanathan.
Okay. Thank you, Nirav. Good evening and a warm welcome to all the participants. Today, we have with us Sashi, Anup and Kaizad. Without much ado, we will get the meeting started with Sashi for your opening remarks first, please.
Thank you, Srini, and thank you, everyone. Let me start with the economic environment. The GDP growth in Q1 FY 2027 has been better than anticipated in high frequency indicators such as industrial production, strong e-way bill, cargo activity, credit growth reflects sustained momentum. Retail consumption growth has also been robust with passenger vehicles, two-wheeler sales all growing upwards of 30-plus percentage. Even consumer durables grew at about 11% YoY. This all bodes very well for the economy, especially with the festive season underway. The broader policy environment has been supportive of economic activity. Alongside this, measures in the form of credit guarantee support to MSMEs have also been effective. RBI's proactive response through measures like the special FCNR swap window generated record inflows, about $133 billion, and helped stabilize the currency. With that background, let's take a quick look at how the business has been shaping up.
We continue to strengthen our liabilities franchise, and it has been delivering with great vigor. Deposits increased 18.8% YoY on a reported basis, including a 4 percentage point lift from special FCNR window. As you will see in our published deck, CASA grew at about 10.8% on an overall basis, and within this, retail CASA growth was about 11.2% YoY compared to 9% year ago, reflecting improving momentum. We added about 1.7 million liability relationships in the second quarter, which is 25% higher than Q1 and 33% higher than the fourth quarter of last year. Building on these new acquired relationships and deepening our existing relationships will enable the liabilities engine to step up further in the coming days, even as we keep adding newer relationships at a rapid pace.
The asset side of the balance sheet also continued to get stronger. Total AUM grew 15.3% year-on-year, including a 1.9% impact of FCNR leverage, with SME and retail assets leading the charge. The pace of retail disbursements is accelerating and has crossed INR 90,000 crore during Q2 FY 2027 as against INR 76,000 crore in Q1 of this year. Growth has been balanced across all lines, whether it is personal loans, the wheels business, gold and agri, and other MSME business as well.
This is also reflected in the rising growth trend in EOP loan book, especially for retail assets ex-agri. September 2026 annual growth is about 11.2% compared to 9.1% as of June 2026 and 7.4% as of March 2026. New credit card issuances at 1.4 million have grown by nearly 19% quarter-on-quarter, indicating the expansion of the growth runway. On the MSME and mid-market business, growth momentum is also improving rapidly.
September 2026 EOP loan growth has grown 23.5% year-on-year compared to 17%-18% year-on-year growth level seen in the last few quarters. Of course, this quarter, we have the ECLGS 5.0 scheme that also created significant opportunities we successfully leveraged. Our ECLGS disbursements of INR 41,000 crore were highest across all banks, and as of August 2026, when the scheme achieved targeted levels. What is driving this momentum? Since May of 2026, the entire retail and MSME business and channel supervisory architecture across the country have been focusing on daily operating rigor across frontline, the credit and operations and service verticals, all working from one view across products and across all channels to ensure a same day, same time resolution of delivery of products and services, queries, and complaints as well. The focus has been on digital adoption and straight-through processing, which is moving up significantly.
The turnaround times on product deliveries have come down anywhere between 10% and 15% in a short span of time, while service delivery TATs have come down by 30% during the quarter. Which means the front line can touch more customers within the same work hours. This is reflected in the customer visits per resource per day going up significantly compared to the prior quarter, almost up by about 50%. This will have an impact on growth, and that is pretty much reflected in the early signs that we have seen on the momentum. For example, the savings accounts per branch per day have gone up by 19% in the last few months, between a Q2 and a Q1. Core incremental deposits per branch per day is up 2.3 times from Q1.
Sometimes, of course, extraordinary one-off outflows may mask this underlying momentum, but at some point in time, this will start to reflect as we move forward. Daily disbursal run rate of key retail and MSME products are up by 10%-20% versus the prior quarter. Our asset quality remains pristine, with GNPA at 1.11%, 13 basis points lower than year on year. Credit costs remain low at 44 basis points. The risk weights total assets at 69%. Our industry-leading asset quality metrics reflect the top quartile credit quality choices we have consistently made. The bank's well-balanced performance translated to ROA of 1.8%, which has been the range that we have been there for a very long time, and quarterly PAT of INR 19.5 billion, which is a growth of 12.7% approximately if you exclude the trading gains. We have a solid platform to reap the. Sorry.
On technology, I would like to spend some time. HDFC Bank has always incorporated cutting-edge technologies into its operations, and we are now bringing AI into the heart of how the bank operates. In the quarter gone by, we introduced applications and apps and features in various areas that will help enhance customer experience and protection. In the area of digital safety for customers, we introduced Edge Security. Very mindful of the fact that a lot of our citizens in the country are being subjected to digital frauds. I think this is going to be a game changer in terms of cutting-edge technology that we can offer to customers. A unified protection stack and tools like Kavach and Secure Lock. We launched several apps to increase customer convenience, including product journeys, AI conversational banking, and AI collections bot that helps customers stay repayment-ready.
We also strengthen our real-time fraud prevention capabilities as well. As my long innings at HDFC Bank come to an end, I would like to say that it has been an absolute privilege to lead this organization that brings together some of the most brilliant minds and over 200,000 extremely committed and focused professionals. A cutting-edge technology, a solid brand that binds the 100 million customers, and the collective zeal to consistently deliver top-class results for all our stakeholders. While leaving this organization is an emotional moment for me personally, I take comfort the fact that I'm leaving behind a solid platform which has demonstrated strength and resilience to navigate regulatory embargoes and unprecedented COVID event, a large complex merger when the economic outlook warranted monetary tightening, and other governance matters of the recent past having been settled completely.
A platform where we invested over the past few years in re-architecting and reinforcing our technology from the core to AI layer, ready to be harnessed in our product and service deliveries. A distribution strength which will deliver as a vintage of branches mature. An optimism stemming from the fact that the net interest margins, which in recent times has borne the brunt of faster repricing of assets and a lag in cost of funds in a down rate cycle, is also positioned for a reversal as we enter the upward rate cycle. This will get further enhanced as the proportion of retail and MSME assets outweigh the proportion of corporate and home loans over a period of time. I'm sure that the bank will keep scaling greater heights, which will be a matter of immense pride for all of us.
I'll also leave behind the hands of an able team spread across various levels in the organization throughout the country, led by a new and an able leader, and I welcome Anup at this juncture heartily to the institution as well. Thank you for all the support over all these years, and I wish you and families a very happy Dussehra and festivities, and I'm sure you will continue to provide the same kind of support and affection that all of you have showered on us over these 30 years to the new leadership team, and take it to its rightful glory over a period of time. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Thank you, Sashi, for that very passionate and a good recount of recent and the decades that you have served the bank. Thank you very much for all of that. Now we have with us today Anup. We are delighted to have you, sir, here with us. Welcome, and over to you for a few sentences that you want to share.
Thank you, Sashi. Thank you, Srini. Thank you, Kaizad. I am really grateful to the board for the trust placed in me as MD and CEO. I look forward to working with the board, chairman, leadership team, and colleagues across the bank and the group to build on the group's very strong foundations. It is indeed a privilege and a responsibility I hold with deep respect.
The group's rich legacy, market leadership, and reputation within India's financial ecosystems are exceptional. I thank Sashi for his impactful six-year leadership, successfully navigating the post-pandemic phase, completing the landmark HDFC Limited merger, scaling our branch network, and strengthening the core technology capabilities. The clear long-term goal is to deliver sustainable long-term value for shareholders, employees, and clients. In the near term, I will engage with regulators, customers, shareholders, and other stakeholders to gather insights that will be a key input to our organizational priorities.
As macroeconomic dynamics evolve and AI technology and digital infrastructures accelerate, we will focus on capturing these opportunities with prudence and discipline. I will soon present a perspective on growth, margins, quality, and productivity built on disciplined capital deployment and a strong execution culture grounded in governance excellence and trust. I look forward to all your support. Over to you, Srini.
Thank you, Anup, for that, and welcome again. Hearty welcome again. We look forward to, as an organization, partnering in delivering all that you drive too. Thank you. With that, Nirav, let's open it up for question and answers, please.
Thank you very much. We'll now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touchtone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. A request to all the participants. Kindly limit yourself to two questions per participant and rejoin for a follow-up. First question is from the line of Mahrukh Adajania from Tara Capital Partners. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, good evening. Thank you, Sashi, for all the guidance and interactions. Thanks a lot, and congratulations, Anup. I had a few questions on the results. Firstly, Sashi, you did outline the various efforts and progress you've made on retail deposits, savings, core deposits. When do you see the proportion of retail deposits inching up now? Because it's come off a bit over the last few quarters. When do you see that proportion inching up? That's my first question. My second question is that you do have a sizable agri book. There have been droughts, so any impact you see either on your small business loans or on your agri/agri-related loans from that? My third question is for Anup. I know it's early days, but if at all he sees any strategy changes in HDFC Life.
Okay. Let me answer the first part of it, Mahrukh. As I had mentioned, the kind of rigor that the institution is undertaking in terms of building better customer interactions and engagement and trying to step up new account acquisitions. The fact of the matter is, a lot of our distribution, which has doubled over the last five years, will start to mature as we move to the next five years. The fact of the matter is that we are trying to enable a lot of product and service delivery journeys, which can help in having a one-click experience, including on bundling of products, depending on the needs of the customer. All this from a foundation and structural perspective, is going to have a massive impact as we move forward.
As I mentioned as well, sometimes you do have some amount of extraordinary outflows that happen because as you say in retail, we mean at the branch banking level, there could be at the catchment, some amount of small MSME customers or government deposits or some of the inherited deposits, such as what we had in the past, some leverage FCNR(B), old FCNR(B) leverage deposits, or some of the deposits that we inherited from the erstwhile HDFC Limited. This quarter, we did have a kind of an outflow of some of these large deposits in multiple such segments, which I've just alluded to, which is actually masking it. So in reality, you will see at some point in time when some of these extraordinary outflows sort of become smaller, you will start the momentum coming about very well.
I think in the presentations which the team has displayed, you will see the productivity of the branches, which is deposits per branch, continues to be very healthy and probably best in class in the banking system. As I am sure Anup in his next weeks or a couple of months time will unveil his strategy, and one of the things is how do we create less pressure on the system to minimize the intake or inflow of corporate liabilities and then ensure. These are some of the things that will be a part and parcel of his thought process as he unveils to the world at large, including yourselves, in probably a month's time or so. Fundamentally, the institution is extremely strong. The distribution is very strong. The rigor is very strong in the right direction. The underlying core momentum is very encouraging.
That should sort of reflect in a very strong momentum as we move forward. Because our balance sheet is extremely large and the fact of the matter is we have a good demand across segments, whether it is corporate, whether it is MSME or retail, the need to pick up some of these non-retail liabilities is a given. I think as we restructure and have alternate strategies on the balance sheet, including some amount of non-deposit strategies, I think we probably will have the proportion of retail becoming larger and larger, and it will have a kind of a downstream impact on multiple metrics as well.
Thank you, Sashi. Like I said, Mahrukh, in the near term, I will engage with the regulators, customers, shareholders, and all other stakeholders to gather insights, and that will be the key input into our organizational priorities. I think
Yeah
FEMA is very, very strong and we are aware of the general strategic imperatives that are required. Sashi spelled it out, and I will come back to all of you soon on those.
On the agri piece, I would like Kaizad to just step in.
Yeah. On the agriculture piece, I think we are all aware that we have had a shortfall in the monsoon, which has been also not very uniform given the peninsula as well as Northern India. Having said that, the actual sowing for the kharif season has more or less remained constant with a marginal decrease of about 1.5% or 2%. It has not had that kind of impact where the sowing is concerned. Consequently, if we look through that, one would believe that the crop therefore should have the output, give or take a variance of about 3%-5%. As of now, as of September, compared to June, our gross NPA on agri has remained largely constant. We have not seen any signs of concern or deterioration. It has held steady. We will observe the situation as it unfolds.
But as I said, what is encouraging is that the sowing has largely been about 108 or 109 million hectares, which is just a marginally lower level than previous year.
Okay. The book growth is also moderated well at this time. It is still not in a double-digit growth. A single-digit growth considering all of the-
That's right. Yeah.
mentioned. Yeah.
Yeah.
Thank you, Mahrukh. Nirav?
Thank you.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Kunal Shah from Citi. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks for taking the question and congratulations, Anup, and thanks, Sashi, for all the interactions over the years. Firstly, with respect to margins, again, margins are down to 3.32%. When we look at it, in fact, the corporate book growth is not as substantial sequentially as we see with the other banks. But the impact on NIMs for us has almost been similar, in terms of the quantum, maybe compared to the banks which have been growing faster on the corporate side. So what is ideally leading to this? The related question is on interest expense side, particularly this time, there is a sequential uptick in the absolute term, okay? It appears like the cost of funds have actually gone up quite significantly sequentially, at least when we do the average of period end. So what is actually driving that cost further up? Yeah.
I can take that. One is coming on the interest expense side. You will see that the cost of funds has flat quarter-to-quarter at about 4.4% last quarter to this quarter. Sequentially, it has remained flat. Ideally, we would have expected that to be better. Better means lower. It didn't because of the mix of the FCNR deposits that came in. So if you look at the deposit growth that we have had, INR 1.57 trillion, almost INR 1.3 trillion is a growth in time deposit. So that outweighs from an overall cost mix point of view and has offset the kind of a repricing on any of the back book that was coming in. So that is why the cost of funds is flat.
Also one other aspect that in the cost of funds that you see is also some relief from the AT1 bonds that were called in August on the callable date. That was a relief, but then that relief was also through other because we did have a borrowing for our leverage. We did have that borrowing offset that. That is why you see at an aggregate level, the cost of fund remained flat.
That means the numerator by the denominator, you are looking at perhaps only the numerator of interest expense. But when you look at both, it is 4.4, which is on one of those pages which is published there. The second aspect of it that you asked about is the mix of the corporate bank. Yes, sequentially, the corporate bank has grown 2.8% in this quarter. Year-on-year it is about 16.4%, which you are seeing in one of those pages, page 10 or something that you are seeing.
Yeah.
But if you are asking about how that mix will evolve over a period of time, I think both Sashi had mentioned it, but Kaizad, you want to take that to say?
Yeah, sure. If you see in the slide which is there already in the investor deck, you have seen how we have brought back the entire retail space. And I had talked about it in April and then again in July on responding to questions as to where do you see growth coming from and what is going to be the focus area. I think if you look at that chart, it clearly shows you that year-on-year from 7.9 or 8%, in a year, we have grown that to 12, and we have grown also business banking significantly out over there, which consists of the MSME largely. If I take just a business banking component, it has grown very handsomely at 28%.
This, of course, has been supported by the fact what Sashi mentioned, that we had the benefit of the ECLGS 5.0. Where the bank did obtain the leadership position and we had the significant coverage, which aided the substantial growth going into the 28% year-on-year. So you will see the retail which has come back in the last year and certainly in the last three quarters. You will see business banking continuing to grow. We see the momentum there. We are seeing it in the economy and the mid MSME is certainly doing well out there. Coming to the corporate side, we have a significant presence across corporate and a good footprint. It is not that we will not grow corporate. I think we have grown it at about 16.5, 17%. Other players have been a couple of percentage more.
But we continue to approach it with a good mix of working capital term and project finance so that we have a good build in the portfolio, as well as we are cognizant of the returns on the portfolio. I hope I've given you, along with the charts, how we have evolved and what we had said, and I think this is a journey that will continue, where we will participate both in the investment part of the cycle of the economy as well as on the consumption side.
Yeah, absolutely. I understand maybe the question was particular. I do appreciate the traction on retail and SME and even within the corporate, we are cognizant of the overall mix. The only question was maybe why still our margin decline is similar to what other players are, why we are not outperforming even on a low base compared to where the other players are. The decline in margins for us is almost similar. That's the only question. Yeah.
I think you will see a change because there is a large amount of the back book which comes into play in retail. Typically given that retail, most products are up to four years and therefore about 20% - 30% of the book runs off every year, you are seeing the back book effect play itself out. Therefore, I think going forward, across the next two quarters, you will see that change coming through as we also grow the volumes in retail and MSME.
Thank you. Kunal, I request you to come back for a follow-up. I request all the participants, please limit yourself to two questions and rejoin for a follow-up question. Next question is from the line of Rikin Shah from IIFL Capital. Please go ahead.
Good evening, and thanks. I had a couple of questions. First one, wanted to understand, how are you deploying the FCNR funds? How much of it will be used to retire wholesale borrowings? At what incremental yields are you able to lend or invest in the money markets until you find the loan deployment opportunities? That's the first one.
Yeah. Rikin, maybe I should go ahead. Rikin, the FCNR deposits, you can take it as deployed because we do need to deploy it as soon as possible. That is why you will get the benefit of the ANBC in the following cycle for comparison for PSL purposes. It's not just about getting an FCNR deposit. The FCNR deposit needs to be deployed to get that benefit of PSL. It has largely happened because money is fungible, as you know that. You don't need to mark, identify, tag this with that. But overall, at an aggregate level, we did have a deposit growth of INR 157,000 crores. And we had a loan growth of INR 158,000 crores in this quarter. So you can take it that the sources and users are largely matched within the quarter.
Got it. The second one is on margins, right? Directionally, I do understand where the trend can look like, but specifically in the next quarter, with the full quarter FCNR impact on your cost of funds, how do you think the margins move? The cost of funds have started to move up. So directionally, what happens in the next quarter for you in margin? Because the repo increase which has happened, that pass-through may happen only from 4Q onwards in your P&L. An extension to that is if you could just share the split of your loan book in terms of repo and MCLR and fixed, please.
I'll start, and Sashi, if you want to jump in, you do that. One is that the floating rate book is approximately 70% of the total book. The 25 basis points change that has happened in October should largely be factored in by December. Not for full quarter, for part of the quarter it should be factored in. So that's one. So there is a tailwind coming from the rate change that will be positive. The full quarter impact of the FCNR will be a headwind that will offset, but I don't want to call it a headwind. That is part of how the businesses are structured to operate. There will be some funding that will come and the choices that we make, and so there will be an offset to that through that process.
Net of that, we still think that can be neutral to positive on the margin as we go forward. I don't want to get to whether what is the next quarter and the following quarter and so on, but from a trajectory point of view, I think that it is at the bottom and will start to. You want to add something?
No. Perfect. I think you have answered that. The trajectory will be upward from the next quarter onwards.
Thank you. Next question is from line of Parag Thakkar from Fort Capital. Please go ahead.
Hello. Yeah. Am I audible?
Yes, sir. Go ahead.
Yeah. First of all, I would like to congratulate Sashi, sir, and Kaizad sir also, and great welcome to Mr. Anup Bagchi. I am a core, hard shareholder of the bank, so I wish you all the best. My basic question was, one is definitely that because of the rate cycle itself, I think for almost all banks, I think Q2 should be the bottom of the margins, right? That is what you alluded to, right? That Q2 margin is the bottom for us also, right? Like for all banks, because repo rate hike cycle has already started.
Yes. By all account, Parag, that is what we were alluding to say, that the rate cycle having already kicked in earlier in October, that is a good tailwind on repricing 70% of the loans which are floating. Large part of that is repo and some of that is other methods, but mostly it is repo. So it is already kicked in and by December it should be in. I do not want to give you exactly how much and what and how it moves, but directionally, yes.
Yeah. It should start improving from Q3 itself, right? That is something which I think everybody wants to know because all our peer banks are also hinting at that.
I don't know if you're asking for one number. That's not something that
No, not number. From Q3 onwards, it will be uptick from Q2, right? That is what I'm asking for.
Right. These are the items that are in play, positives, and the headwinds will be some full quarter impact of whatever has come through in Q2.
Okay. As Kaizad sir also highlighted that already we have seen started the growth in business banking, gold loans, personal loans, and such areas where the yield on advances are slightly higher, and while the corporate growth versus peers was slightly calibrated in this quarter itself. Can we think like that now that is the trajectory to increase our margins going ahead because that is what others have also done and demonstrated without compromising asset quality. For example, yesterday, PNB result I saw that they reduced their lower-yielding advances by INR 68,000 crore in a quarter, and they gave it to places where there was a higher yield, and that is how they were able to improve their QoQ margins by 8 basis points. Something like that can be the trajectory going ahead for HDFC Bank also?
You have to look at it in a more wholesome manner. This is not something where on a quarter-on-quarter basis you keep shifting the goalposts. There are relationships which you as a bank have to value and nature and for a 10 basis points more in a portfolio or thereabout, you don't walk away. Having said that, yes, there is a clear move as already demonstrated, and I referred to it a little earlier while responding to a question. You will see us having certainly come back with more rigor on our retail assets and MSME space. Some of those products within retail assets give you sometimes the same return as some of your products in wholesale banking. It's not to generalize it with one brush.
There are certain products in consumer bank which give you a higher yield, and we will take a calibrated approach in getting a little larger market share in those products whilst keeping our presence across each of our business segments that we operate in.
Thank you, Kaizad. One other point I do want to mention, Parag, for you to note. It's there in the detailed disclosures in our 20-F, where you will see the return on asset by broad segments. Whether it is a wholesale segment or retail segment, the return on asset is very similar and comparable. The reason is there will be certain products with high margin, some products with low margin, and then it compensates itself through cost dynamics, which are going in the opposite direction of what the margin offers. Similarly, the credit cost dynamics also operates in the opposite direction of what the margin provides, so that the return at the end of the day, the return on asset, when you look at it, is comparable.
As Kaizad said, to the extent that it is about relationship building from a returns both ROA and ROE, it would be appropriate to have the right mix there. Yeah.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Piran Engineer from CLSA. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. And thank you to Mr. Jagdishan and Mr. Bagchi for leading the bank since COVID. And congrats to Mr.
Piran, sorry to interrupt. Your voice is not clear. Can you speak through the handset, please?
Yeah. Is it better now?
Yes. Thank you.
Yeah. Hi. My first question to you is on MCLR. In the last rate cycle, HDFC Bank cut their MCLR much more than ICICI and Axis. Just wanted to understand the reasons behind that, and in a rate hike cycle, could we expect the same?
See, there are several nuances on MCLR. It operates on certain rate dynamics that exist on the last day of the prior period, not necessarily representative of a month or a quarter or anything. Such nuances are there. You operate with day's data when you look forward and do. The second thing is also that MCLR also has got a component of the cost. You know that our cost to assets is at about 1.74, 1.73 thereabout, which again, is low. Similarly, the credit cost also plays into the dynamics of determining what the MCLR is. Having given you all of this theory of what MCLR is, the proportion of our book that is priced to MCLR is minuscule, single digit.
Understood. Okay, so you're saying you factor in the credit cost also, or the outlook on credit cost also. Sorry, am I audible?
Yeah. Go ahead.
Okay. Got it. My second question is really on asset quality. Now we are seeing slippages improve on a YoY basis for the last four, five quarters. Just wanted to understand, is it really a function about loan mix changing towards corporate? Or is it more a function that in each cohort we are seeing better slippage outcomes?
We are seeing better-
Yeah. Sorry.
Please go ahead.
Yeah. We are seeing better across most of those portfolios on the slippages.
Not a mix.
It's not mixed. That's why if you look at page 19 that we produce, we just don't do ratios, we also put numbers. We just put absolute value of slippages where you see that. Yes. If you look at the percentages, then the denominator of a low risk or a highly rated book could weigh. But we are looking at an absolute number there, which you see on page 19. So it's a combination across all of those books that contributes to that slippages. And the credit environment has also been benign for a long time and continues to be benign.
Thank you very much. Next question is from the line of Chintan from Autonomous. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thank you for taking my question. Firstly, congratulations to Sashi, Srini, and Kaizad for a long, successful career at HDFC, and I am sure the next chapter will be equally fascinating for you. And congrats to Anup for the new role. My question would be, as Anup comes into the role, what would be your guidance to him in terms of, with hindsight, what were maybe one or two or three mistakes that have happened over the last three to five years? I would not say mistake per se, hindsight is a cruel reviewer. But with hindsight, what could have been done differently, and what would you recommend Anup does differently? Would love to be a fly on the wall of that conversation. Then my second question would be on pricing policy.
I think when we started the last cycle of, say 2022, when we had the big credit boom, the industry and perhaps you as well, probably assume that CASA ratio will come back for the industry. It just has not come back. So all the calculations you do in terms of anticipating ROEs for future business probably has been out of whack for the full industry. You have many a times highlighted that pricing has been irrational in the market. Do you think that on the current spreads that the industry is making, the industry is able to make an ROA above cost of equity? Or there is a need for industry to think about repricing its cost of funds into its customer spreads. Thank you so much.
Want me to start and, yeah. Chintan, thank you for that. I will start and then I think the others will join in. Your question of whether the cost of funds opportunity through better CASA mix, is it capped at this stage due to whatever customer behavior and market situation? I do not believe so. I am not going to talk about the industry as a whole, but I am going to talk about our bank. For our bank, with the distribution that we have done and with the statistical models that we see in terms of how it progresses through the maturity model, we do think that the space to get more customers, more balances, increase the market share in certain of the districts out of the 765 districts that we are in.
More than 54% of the districts, a significant opportunity exists because we are 2-3 percentage points lower than our average market share in those markets. So those are nascent branches. When you look at whether household deposits do exist in those markets, that is what you go to look for. You may have a market share opportunity, but is it household deposits? Yes, it is the household deposits that are available in those markets to take. If you look at the companies or the banks that are there, currently incumbent banks which are there, these are some legacy banks which are there, who have been ceding market share over time, and we are confident of continuing to impress upon those customers to get to us.
I just want to leave the thought saying that it is not a saturated play, but at least the statistical model shows that there is a space there.
See, if you really look at it properly, it is not in the public domain as yet. But when we split the deposits into retail and non-retail, and you look at the retail CASA ratio, it is a very healthy number. It is in the late 40s, and that has been a kind of an average, which is pretty much stable over a long period of time. It is just that the balance sheet is so large, and the fact of the matter is that over the last three years, we have had to substitute the borrowing maturities of the Erstwhile HDFC Limited, which is almost nearing about INR 2.6 lakh crore, which necessitated the institution to take more time deposits, substituting that.
Effectively, apart from that, as all of us seen and as you have alluded as well, the incremental accretion to low-cost current and savings accounts in the system is becoming smaller and smaller due to the fact that there is a structural shift that is happening in the household savings behavior. When you put all this together, structurally, I think this is going to be an issue in the system over a period of time. But having said that, which Anup and team will unveil it in the near future, there may be certain structural adjustments that one may have to do on a, not just on a one-time basis, but maybe on a continuous basis on the balance sheet side, which will ensure that we continue to have patronized core retail deposits.
He will find alternate ways of trying to see how to keep the funding requirements to the bare minimum, which is far more affordable and far more, which does not stretch the system, which will necessitate us to take on high-cost liabilities. Hence, the CASA ratio may be protected in future. These are all blue-skying thoughts since you mentioned that this is something that, what is it that one would need to do? Having said that, why conjecture that? Anup is here. He will probably talk to you all in about a month's time to both the sell and buy side analysts. As I said, I am sure you will hear from him directly, but give him some time. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. Next question is from Nitin Aggarwal, from Motilal Oswal. Please go ahead.
Hi, good evening and thanks for the opportunity. I would like to firstly thank Sashi, Kaizad, and Srini for the valuable leadership and all the insightful interactions all these years. Also, congrats, Anup and convey my best wishes for the journey ahead. So first question is on the manpower requirement. If I look at HDFC Bank over the last three years, our employee base has been the same, which is partly the way the trend has been for all private banks to some extent. But how do you look at the trend over the next two, three years? Will the operating leverage, will the gains from digitization continue to drive a similar trend or you see some changes happening to the employee hiring run rate over the coming years?
Nitin, you will be risking asking me this question, and I hope I do not put Anup in a spot. But having said that, the view I have is, I think the technology investments is on the cusp of being harnessed much more than what we had. I think it is coming out of the investment phase. So that is part one. That is pretty much reflected in the fact that a fair amount of our product and service journeys are becoming far more straight-through, which means that the turnaround times for the deliveries of products and services has been coming down, which means that the capacities are increasing.
The way I see it is that as we see the adoption move up, as we see the overlay of AI on top of these applications becoming far more mature, the need for enabler functions, whether it is firstly the business enabler functions, whether it's the operations or the credit verticals, and maybe in future, the corporate enabler functions, will not need to have that kind of a capacity in their verticals in future. But having said that, we are still about 11%-12% of the market, which means that the runway for growth is massive. We have said this in the past, and I continue to believe, and I am sure Anup will also sort of look at these aspects. We believe there would be a kind of a mixed change in our employee composition.
We'll have more and more people in the frontline customer-facing roles, and we have lesser and lesser people in the back end. Maybe there'll be some who will move on to technology as well because technology investments are going to be extremely intense and large going forward. As we see that kind of a transition that keeps happening and which is still some more time to go, I believe the institution will try to maintain the staff count and try and move more and more people to the front line. But there will be an inflection point. The fact of the matter is when the opportunity is pretty large, they will start to hire incrementally even in the front line and maybe at some point in time, even at the back end.
I think India is going to be blessed and so will the institution, whoever adopts the digitization and AI in a very significant manner. I would say that this would be the trajectory where it'll remain flat and probably it'll start to increase over maybe three, four years' time. Anup, he says that he's also on the same page. I will now ask him as an investor like you all.
Sure. Thank you for that. Nitin, one thing, don't lose the sight that if you look at our resources headcount addition, you're talking about last one year or two years where it is modest. Any growth that we've had over a one-year period, which is at 15% or over a two-year period when you look at it, probably still in double digit, that is fully productivity realizing. But when you look at a longer period, let's say, take a five or a six-year period, we have added 10% compounded annual rate of growth on headcount. 10% we have added, and we've got volumes which are high teens, 18%, 19% thereabout, which means we've realized productivity which was single digit when you look at a long period. In the recent period, double-digit productivity. So more room there to realize the productivity there. That's what he's saying.
There are tools that he talked about that will give, but even without tools, the productivity is still in store to be realized there.
Right. Got that. The other question is on the liabilities because I believe that a liabilities accretion is something that has the most important because even this quarter, if you see the LCR ratio, CD ratio, this is a quarter wherein banks benefited from FCNR deposits, but these ratios have still not moved in the right direction. Can we really rely on to the branch productivity metric that we have historically seen over the long period in a very changing market environment? There are banks who are not investing in as many branches, but playing on rates probably and generating pretty healthy liability accretion. What all initiatives, what are levers can we pull to accelerate liability growth over the coming years? Again, this question is open both to you, Sashi and Anup.
Do not go by a quarter phenomena, Nitin. The fact of the matter is I alluded to it as well. Whilst the underlying momentum is very encouraging, unfortunately you had some large one-off outflows, which is not within our control, some planned, some unplanned as well. Which necessitated the institution to take resort to some of the Non-retail deposits which have a lesser LCR cover, and which is the reason why you are not seeing commensurate improvement in the LCR ratios.
But the institution is seized, and I am sure that over a period of next couple of quarters, you will see a strategic thought process as to what one would like to do and what they will be doing in terms of not only ensuring that the core liability momentum continues in a strong manner to what are the balance sheet adjustments one needs to do to ensure that the LCR coverage is also very healthy. Mind you, whilst you are looking at an LCR, there is another metric called liquidity, may not be visible to you all, but the institution's liquidity is extremely comfortable and probably slightly more than comfortable. I just want to leave that thought to the larger world and the audience that a low LCR does not mean a low liquidity. The liquidity is extremely comfortable.
But having said that, we hear you, and you will see a kind of a thought process in the near future from Anup and team on what they're planning to do in improving core liability momentum and the LCR flight path as well.
Thank you. Next question is from line of Ankit Bihani from Nomura. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thank you for the opportunity. I had a question on LCR again. So at this level now we are at 113%, will this become a constraint on your incremental loan growth going ahead even if the deposit mobilization remains relatively weak? And further towards the FCNR thing, we have still seen HDFC Bank be quite active in the CD market. Why is it so? And given that what I understand is that certificate of deposits are kind of LCR positive, given that their run-off is 100% only on the month they are maturing. So if you could shed some light on that. And my second question is on the draft insurance norms. Any analysis that we have done, what could be the impact on our bank insurance income there? And the third is on the PSL front.
We have seen on the SMF side, the shortfall has widened. What are we doing to address that? Yeah.
First is the LCR question. Yes, we would like to operate between 110 and 120, which we have told you over last few years, somewhere probably in the middle, 115. Yes, we are at 113 or so. That's part of how time to time space on growth that one has to use. You know that the regulatory standard is 100 but we do want to operate between 110 and 15. Yes, we do need to keep that at that kind of a level for us to keep growing. That's one. Your thought process and assumption that we do need to use that as an important kind of a floor somewhere around that level so that we are able to grow is correct. The next question you asked is about the PSL-
CD issuance.
CD issuance, that's part of what market opportunities exist and Sashi alluded to certain outflows that we manage. Replace one large ticket with another large ticket. If you look at our total deposits, branch-driven deposits is at about 80% or so of the total, which is on one of those pages that we have published, you will see that. So within that, whatever the churn that happens has happened, and again, we'll be opportunistic to take whatever is available and at a price that is suitable there. The third one was relating to PSL-
Draft insurance.
Draft insurance policy that is there. As you know, it is still in a draft form, calling for comments by end of, sometime in November, I think the comments are due. Once that settles, we will know where it is. But one thing, yes, indeed, the cut down in the commission rates is quite high. There are three other things that one need to work with to see, as soon as we know where that commission rate settles. One is what kind of a persistency pickup it will provide. So that could be kind of a positive effect to that. The other one could be this whole exercise of better commission rates, so thereby lower cost of insurance is the goal.
It is not about the commission, it is about how does the end consumer have a cost of insurance which is low, which means higher levels of participation, which means more volumes. That's the second thing. And the third thing is, of course, the cost structure itself. One has to address if some of the commission structures are changing, we'll have to address it through some cost structures, too, right? So in terms of what do you have in terms of certain programs that we could combine and bring some efficiency there, both on our side as well as the manufacturer side. We need to work on that because there is also expense of management targets there. And for us also when the commission goes, we'll look at our structure of what we spend, particularly certain variable related. So we do have certain levers to work.
But yes, in its current form, when you look at only the commission, it is pretty strong, pretty high impact.
On the PSL, the question on PSL.
See, our PSL achievement is at aggregate level about 50% or so. At aggregate level, we are quite okay. The place where we always scramble around to make it is the last 2 mi on the small and marginal and weaker section, that we have a dual qualification. The small and marginal farmer, to the extent it's available, we are there to take, either originate organically in our book or buy it in the market. It's very scarce. It's not available. The cost is high, right? That's true. We are in the market to buy, and we are short by a few percentage points. We are trying to address it in whatever way we can, to the extent it's available. If you have anything your organization can broker to sell, we'll be happy to buy.
Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, we will take that as the last question, and now hand the conference over to Mr. Vaidyanathan for closing comments.
Yeah. Thank you, Nirav. Sashi, over to you for final remarks.
Yeah. As we were in the call, I think the world would have just got another notification to the exchanges that a dear colleague, Kaizad, has requested for early retirement by end of December. I would like to really place on record his wonderful contribution of Kaizad to the institution. He's been a founding member, he's been one of the key architects of the USP of the institution, which is the credit architecture. Then moving on to a fair amount of areas of business, now handling the entire asset side of the balance sheet. It's going to be a big loss to the institution, but obviously, he has done it for the right intentions and for the love of this institution. I think we'll all miss him, but my best wishes to him and his family for such a wonderful stint at the institution.
Thank you, Kaizad, and thank you. Very best to you.
Thank you, Sashi.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. With that, we will sign off. Any other questions, comments, or other inputs that you all need, please reach out to our investor relations team and we will be happy to join and participate with you to discuss. Thank you. Bye-bye.
Thank you. On behalf of HDFC Bank Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.