Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to KPIT Technologies Limited Q1 FY 2021 earnings conference call hosted by Dolat Capital Markets Private Limited. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen only mode and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star then zero on your touchtone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Rahul Jain from Dolat Capital. Thank you and over to you, sir.
Thank you, Neil. Good evening, everyone. On behalf of Dolat Capital, I would like to thank management of KPIT Technologies for giving us this opportunity to host the call. Now I would like to hand the conference over to Mr. Sunil Phansalkar, who is AVP and Head IR at KPIT to do the management introductions. Over to you, Sunil.
Thanks, Rahul. A very good afternoon and a warm welcome to everybody on the Q1 FY21 earnings call of KPIT Technologies. I hope all of you are continuing to take good care and staying safe. Today on the call, we have Mr. Kishor Patil, the CEO and MD, Sachin Tikekar, President and board member, Priya Hardikar, Senior Vice President and Head of Finance and Sunil from the IR team. As we do always, we'll have the opening comments by Mr. Kishor Patil on the performance of the company and the way we look the year ahead. Then we'll have this floor open for questions. Once again, a very warm welcome and I will hand this over to Mr. Kishor Patil.
Good afternoon. I would like to take you through the highlights of earnings for quarter one. First coming at the revenue. Our revenues dropped 9% year-over-year, quarter-over-quarter and 14% from the last quarter, Q4 to Q1. The way we need to look at this is in view of a few factors. Number one, most of our customers, their revenues dropped by more than 50% on an average globally. Number two, if you look at all the engineering service providers, most of them in automotive and transportation, their revenues have dropped somewhere between 12%-35% quarter-over-quarter across the globe. It includes European, Indian and other players. In light of this and in light of the guidance which we have provided for the last quarter of reduction in revenue of 15% over Q4, we did a shade better by doing a 14%, restricting the growth to 14%.
I would like you to give some little more information in terms of the details in terms of revenues. One is the strategic customer. As you know, the T25 is our backbone of our revenues as we have T21 as of now. The overall portion of revenues from these customers increased to 86%. What it means is our all the key customers and our the main customers continued to hold stronger during this time. The other important thing as we have seen and which gives a lot of confidence is, I must say that wherever there has been cuts in the spending the customers have done, the cuts done with KPIT have been lowest among the vendors. From that perspective has helped us to increase our market share with our strategic customers.
In addition to that, I think the key highlights includes the large deals we have been in a position to conclude during this time. Last quarter also we announced one large deal. During this quarter also we have one significant deal in excess of $60 million over the next five years. What we have seen is some of, I mean, these deals take some time to conclude, but this gives us a visibility over a longer term and it really underlines the relationship KPIT forms in a strategic way with some of these customers during this time. This is the second consecutive large deals we have concluded in this year and we have few in the pipeline.
In addition to this, we have closed four to five deals which includes three with OEMs across our practices, electric powertrain, autonomous, connected and also we did a couple of deals with tier ones. Overall as we could see is there has been winning of the deals across the geography, across the practices and customer segments. Coming back to the margin. I think the key part of that is we have been in a position to maintain EBITDA of 13.4%. Basically what it means is the overall the margins have been intact and as the growth comes back, the overall profitability of PAT will go up. Two things I would like to mention is in this, the PAT has decreased by 35% over Q4 and in spite of the EBITDA being this stable.
There are few reasons for that and I would like to go into detail of that and the main reason has been depreciation. If you look at the overall depreciation, which is INR 330 million for the quarter, INR 125 million is on account of lease. More than one-third part of this is because of the lease. Just to put it in the perspective, even during this year as compared to the last year, last year our CapEx was INR 60 crores or INR 600 million. This year, our total CapEx will be INR 480 million. Overall, our CapEx is going to reduce, but the depreciation has gone up because of the lease. If you really look at how it is going to pan out for the next year, in Q2 it will go up by 8%, basically the depreciation.
Q3 it will reduce by 8%, and Q4 it will reduce further by 10%. Overall, we feel that our depreciation will be, you can consider at little less than 6% at quarter four and continue to be at that level as a model. While there will be some variations, that's how we see that. We have not really incurred any significant expenses in CapEx, neither we intend to do that in any near future. It is only on account of lease, why this has happened. The reason it will go down is basically because during this quarter, as we have said, that we have taken a large facility, we established a large facility in Munich. The consolidation of other facilities in Germany to the Munich site as well as in consolidation of facilities in India, that will happen maybe by the end of quarter three.
The full impact of this can be seen only in quarter four. Overall, again, to say that overall CapEx for this year will be INR 48 crores as compared to INR 60 crores last year. Coming to the cash and liquidity, we have INR 394 crore net cash, which is an addition of INR 66 crore during the quarter. This is free cash to EBITDA ratio is 125%. We continued significantly for last six quarter, the cash generation has been very strong. While our debtors have increased from INR 66 in Q4 to INR 72 in Q1, it is on account of extended payment terms granted to two customers specifically, and that will be settled, I would say, in latest by Q4, if not in Q3. I think the overall liquidity and debtors is completely according to plan. During this quarter, we established our Germany presence.
It is very strategic for us for multiple reasons. As you know, the KPIT's vision, reimagining mobility and to establish ourself as the leading software integrator across the world. It is very important that we have the global presence and deep domain knowledge. From that perspective, we have established this office, which has more than 700 capacity. We will consolidate our other offices here as well as most of the new deals we will be executing, the large deal builds we'll be executing from this office. This is very important because this allows us, one, to be close to customers and be a part of critical, I would say, for German companies, in their critical programs, to participate to attract the best talent across the Europe, and outside too. As I have mentioned in our press release, people from 25 nationalities work from Germany office.
The third thing is it actually positions us well, in terms of a global player with a deep domain knowledge as the customer all over the world do not visit only in India, but most of them do come to Germany office to see what is the latest there. Many of our practices are actually run out of Germany. Coming back to practices, electric powertrain, ADAS, connected continue to be our areas of growth. Is supposed to grow further during the year. Our pipeline is stronger in these areas. The software integration is a very critical positioning for us, and that is important in all these domain. We believe that niche will help us to really win these large deals. Many of these large deals we have won are in the area of the software integration across the domains.
In terms of people, which is of course the backbone of the company. We continue to invest into building the competence with the people. During the last quarter, we had more than 20% of the people going through significant training during the quarter and really getting them ready for the assignments or the new skills. Now we also conducted a survey across work from home because more than 98% of our people were working from home. There were key highlights of it. With all our customers, we have been sharing the data, productivity data, and I would say more than 95% of the people are very comfortable with the productivity, what we have shown. Our people are very happy to work from home, and they have shown good productivity. They think it is a productive way. However, we have also understood some gaps.
As this work from home will continue beyond the corona, we want to really make sure that we establish very strong processes for this, and ensuring that the productivity goes up when people work from home. Overall attrition has been around 11%, that seems to be on the lower side as in view of our expectation, we expect this to go down further for some time. Going forward, I would like to give a glimpse of the rest of the year. Of course, we will not share specific number, this will give you some idea about how the year will pan out. In quarter two, we expect the cost savings to be whatever the cost savings we have taken the steps for, we will get this for the whole of the quarter. We will save money in the cost.
There will be higher depreciation, as I mentioned, 8% more than quarter one, because our Munich facility depreciation will be there for the whole of the quarter. Overall, this will be a flattish quarter, Q2, in terms of revenue as well as profits. In terms of Q3, if you look at, we'll have increase in the offshoring. The utilization will go up. As we had mentioned in the past, that we have restructured the salary of many of our employees. We will basically restore the salary structure. We will bring back the salary to normal levels. During this quarter, we are expecting revenue growth, the margin improvement even after absorbing the salary restoration, and there will be marginal improvement in EBITDA post-salary restoration. In Q4, we further are looking forward to more offshore revenues, better operational efficiency, lower depreciation due to consolidation and other points I mentioned.
We expect the revenue to go up, EBITDA to go up further. PAT to go up further. This is how the year will pan out for us. I think we feel in a much better place from the last quarter. We have a better visibility. We have been encouraged by the response from the customers as well as our employees. We have these wins. Based on that, we are in a position to give you this outlook. Thank you. We are ready for questions.
Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question, you may press star one on your touch-tone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking the question. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. Anyone who wishes to ask the question, you may press star one. First question is from the line of Nitin Padmanabhan from Investec. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, good evening, and congratulations on the second consecutive large deal win and strong cost management. I had a couple of questions. One is, you did allude to there being a pipeline of a few more large deal wins. Any color you could give us on those. Are these of similar sizes? Of the deals that we have won so far, is there any element of vendor consolidation or any such thing that we have gained during the quarter?
Thanks, Nitin. I think I would say that we have few deals in pipeline of similar nature, I would say, and the sizes. Every deal is, of course, unique in its own way. First thing, I would say that these deals sell across the practices, largely in EPT and autonomous. Largely in EPT autonomous, but we are very confident that in connected also, we'll see some deals. One of these deals is like a vendor consolidation. It is based on that, and specifically what we talked about this quarter. Most of the time, that happens basically not only from the cost perspective, but from a value proposition perspective. Basically our value proposition for some of these vendor consolidation is improving their productivity, better quality, and making them successful with their customers.
I think when the clients are in a position to see that, I think they are amenable to this idea. Certainly there one was on this. The other two I see are very significant also and strategic in other way, where many of the customers are looking of disaggregation of hardware and software. As I said, they are looking at independent software integrator, other than the hardware player. That is where we have established ourselves or positioned ourselves as a very strong player. That is where some of these deals have come from. To your point, there are two, three ways in which we are looking at large deals. One is some of these trends, some of vendor consolidations, and the third is in terms of many of these customers are looking at owning of the software or having a better control on the software.
That's where we are trying to work out propositions where we have a lot of assets. That really ensures them, one is quicker time to market, better quality. I think these are our propositions for the large deals.
Sure. I had two more, if I may. One is, if you look at our pipeline today versus how you would have seen it maybe a quarter ago, do you think that it's sort of come back up quite well? Two, in terms of whatever cuts we saw from clients during the quarter in terms of spending, how much of that do you think would be short term in nature, which will probably come back through the course of the year?
Hi, this is Sachin Tikekar. Let me answer the second question first. Out of the cuts, we have line of sight to more than 60% as we speak, to come back during the course of the year. Obviously we are not going to let go of the remaining 40%. We'll keep tracking it, but we keep tracking it every week. Right now we believe more than 60% will come back during the course of the year. Sorry, Nitin, what was the first part of the question?
The first part of the question was, how does the pipeline look versus maybe a quarter or a year ago? How does it look in terms of visibility and confidence, basically?
I think, easy answer for quarter one is it's much, much better because, even though we want to be optimistic, we are going to be cautiously optimistic given the overall scenario. It's much better than what it was a quarter ago. Like I said, we remain cautiously optimistic. If the pandemic continues to be stable the way it is today, it's not going to go away. If it doesn't throw up other challenges, things should get better during the course of the year.
Sure. Great. That's very helpful. Our last data point question is, CapEx for the rest of the year would be around INR 15 crores. Is that correct?
Total CapEx for the year would be about INR 48 crores is what we have said.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes. I ask this, Sunil, because last year, at least if we sum up the CapEx from the investor updates, it works out to INR 110 crores.
Yeah.
There's a difference between that and what we suggest. I was just wondering, is it something?
That number includes the right-to-use assets number and the real CapEx was INR 60 crores last year. If we exclude the right-to-use lease CapEx.
Sure. Fair enough. Thank you so much. All the best.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Next question is from Baidik Sarkar from Unifi Capital. Please go ahead.
Gentlemen. Hi, thanks for the opportunity. Two broad questions. I understand we don't disclose and discuss order book per se, but given the significant deal wins we've had in just the last two quarters, about $110 million in just two client accounts. On a YY basis, how much better off does our order book look? Given that we expect H2 to be significantly better than H1, are we in a position to kind of comment that we could go back potentially to the $70 million, $75 million run rate by, say, the end of H2? Just wanted your broad comments on that.
No, I think it's a good question. As I mentioned, even though things have stabilized to some extent in the last few weeks and we remain cautiously optimistic, the world is still not out of the woods. It's very difficult to predict beyond a point. All we can say is right now things are definitely looking up. I think as per my earlier answer, we should see more the pipeline getting better as we get deeper into the year.
Sure, Sachin. For the rest of the year, which is basically H2, are we better off in assuming a mid-single digit kind of a sequential growth? Because, I mean, we do have some kind of visibility as far as our ramp up in offshoring and all that is concerned. Would a mid-single digit assumption be way off the mark, or would it be too aggressive?
I think we would choose not to give any numbers. I think you can see that we are pretty confident because we are going for a salary restoration in quarter three. We are seeing after that we will be in a position to increase our profitability, and Q4 it will improve further. To give you, again, I can only give you directionally this. Our pipeline is much, I won't say significantly more, but it's about the similar what it was in the last year or so, and qualitatively much better. That's how I would put it. We see that, as Mr. Tikekar mentioned, we hope it will improve as we go deeper in the year.
Sure. I appreciate that, sir. Which means in terms of our margins, obviously pre-COVID, our aspiration was closer to 15% and we ought to have exited last quarter, which is Q4, at about 14%. Is it probable that with some support from top-line coming in towards the end of this year, our Q4 exit can be closer to 14%-14.5%? Is that a number that we would aspire to, realistically?
Yeah, if you look at we are at 13.4%
Yeah
13.4%. We have said that it will improve over the next couple of quarters.
That's a fair assumption. Okay. Lastly, on your other income. Frankly, the carry that we see on your other income, it doesn't tally with the significant cash that is built up on your books. If you just explain, how the mechanics work and given the significant accretion we expect for the rest of the year as well, how should one model for other income for the rest of the year?
Other income.
today is less than 2%.
Yeah, other income typically will have Forex gains or losses. These are of two types. One is, of course, on the hedging part, but the second is on the conversion of foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. If the closing rates for these two consecutive quarters, the gap between the closing rates is not very high either way, the overall other income doesn't change. Last quarter, actually, if you look at Q4 and the quarter earlier, the difference in the closing rates was much higher and hence there were conversion gains. Whereas if you look at this quarter and the last quarter, the gap in the closing rates was not very high, and hence those gains on conversions did not come to the profit and loss account. That is the reason why other income has gone down as compared to the last quarter.
It is basically the conversion of foreign currency assets and liabilities. Of course, there is interest income part in it, which, if you notice, has been increasing gradually over the last four quarters, and it will continue to do so going forward.
Yeah. Actually, Sunil, my question was more on the latter part, which you alluded to, because assuming a INR 400 crore net cash balance, even at a very conservative 5% yield, I think our quarterly carry on that alone should be closer to four or five crores, which is not the number that we're seeing on our treasury income today.
I would just like to cut you short there. When we see a gross cash of INR 400 crores, we have actually given a breakup of how much is in investment accounts and that too how much is in India and how much is outside. As you know, we have subsidiaries around the globe, and it is not pure subsidiary of development centers outside. The cash is also required to be maintained in those centers. If you look at the breakup, I think we have been increasing the quantum of cash in investment accounts, and we will continue to do so. You'll see a gradual rise in the amount invested and hence the yield on the cash invested.
Sure. What kind of an effective tax rate should we assume for the next nine months?
The tax rate will not change significantly from the previous year, so it will be in the same range of about 18%.
All right. Thanks. All the best. I'll come back in the queue for more questions.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Next question is from Vimal Gohil of Union Asset Management. Please go ahead.
Yes, gentlemen. Thank you and congratulations for a good set of numbers in a challenging environment. Sir, sorry, I joined a bit late, so pardon me if I'm repeating some of this. If you could just highlight this INR 48 crores of CapEx, where exactly is this going to be spent on?
This INR 48 crores will be mainly spent on our hardware and software intangibles, which is our routine course of CapEx for the business.
Okay. The second question was just to understand the rationale behind the Munich facility. Is this facility largely to consolidate your other smaller facilities? If I were to look at the current context of work from home gaining a lot of importance, my intuition would really tell me that there would be a lot more focus on greater offshoring because as it is, you're having a very good productivity while working from home. Just wanted to know the management's rationale on having another facility overseas, which will probably even entail more costs. How are you planning to sort of manage that?
Two, three things. Of course, as we have said in our IR update, that this includes a consolidation of our facility. Certainly some of these deals which we are signing, these are pretty, I would say, new business model, I would say these are one-of-its-kind of deals and pretty intense in terms of domain and technology. This will have a reasonable onsite to offshore ratio, so it will require some significant presence on-site. Looking at the few deals which we have signed and few deals in the pipeline, I think we will require that going forward. As I said, I'm not looking at it only from this. We are almost looking at Germany as our second corporate office, and that is very important to really establish ourselves in the leadership position globally. It is very important, and we can leverage it in multiple way.
All our basically improvement in the profitability, et cetera, is after considering this. As you know, over last three years, I think we have substantially outgrown in terms of industry growth rates. It is important for us to be in the market specifically for some of these significant deals. From that perspective, we have established this. Lot of domain knowledge which is required is not available to that extent outside many places. That place seems to where you can attract the talent across.
Sir, when you say that this facility will help you consolidate the smaller facilities, what will be then your total seat count in Germany, in Munich after adding this particular facility? What is the increase?
About INR 700.
Okay. This INR 700 is entire incremental, but would this not include consolidation of the facility?
Of course it includes consolidation.
Okay. Now you have 700 seats total in Germany at this point in time.
Yes.
Okay. Sir, my second question was on this MicroFuzzy amount that you have mentioned in the presentation. Could you highlight what is that all about?
This was a deal which we did three years ago. There is an earn-out payment where every year we acquire a part of the ownership there. We have currently owned about 95% in MicroFuzzy. There is still about 5%, which we will do at the end of this calendar year.
What is the approximate outlay for that?
It should be around EUR 3 million.
EUR 3 million. Okay. Sir, my last question was on the rationale of keeping cash in overseas subsidiaries. If you could just highlight what probably holds us back on keeping cash in some of the stable liquid funds that some of your peers do. If you could just explain that.
What happens is, during the end of the quarters, unexpectedly, the receipts come in in those subsidiaries, and some of the operational cash flows are required to be maintained in those subsidiaries for the first week of payments towards employment and other tax payments. Those operational cash flow availability needs to be maintained at the subsidiary level, and therefore, they are at the outside India entity.
Let me also add a little bit. If you know the history of KPIT, after the demerger, we had less than INR 70 crore of cash to start with. From there, we have reached about INR 400 crores over this period, about five quarters.
Five quarters.
That's a significant cash generation over five quarters. Initially, I think we had to settle and all that merger, demerger, there were multiple things we had to do in terms of entity restructuring and et cetera. We could not really deploy them for a long term in terms of cash. Actually, we have started doing that only from the last quarter and more from this quarter. Of course, we are also looking at how we can improve our yield also. We will see that certainly some of this impact going forward. We are improving the overall global cash management as now we have more flexibility with us.
Going forward, we will see more amount of cash being deployed domestically in maybe risk-free assets.
Yes.
Got your point. Sir, last question from my end. If you could just highlight out of your total employee workforce, how much is deployed overseas and how much is deployed here back in India?
Around 1,200 people are working outside India.
1,200?
Yeah.
Okay. Thank you, sir. All the very best.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Next question is from Mohit Jain from Anand Rathi. Please go ahead.
Hi, sir. Two questions. First is there a reclassification of strategic or top 25 accounts in this quarter? How should we assume it going forward? Like, the account will move to T21 or will it be back to T25?
What we have done is this time, of course, the strategic accounts are T25, but the relationships that we have established, we believe are T21. As we add to that T21, this number will change. There is no change in the number of accounts or the composition of those accounts. It is just that the T21 are where we believe we have good strategic relationships, and that's the number that we have mentioned.
Sir, the revenue breakup that you have given is from T21 or T25 ?
T21.
Last quarter it was T25, right?
Yes. We have given it. We have changed it for last quarter and we have changed it for the earlier quarter.
Can you give me 25 number for this quarter? We have a time series forT 25.
I will have to see it. I'll give it to you later.
Okay.
We'll put it on the website.
That will help.
Yeah.
Sir, second thing is on your thoughts, specifically on dividend payout, given that now CapEx requirements are frozen and they appear to be low, and your business stabilizing. What should we expect in terms of payout for FY21?
I think our payout policy is not very different, at the same time, till our salary restructuring for employees in effect, we will not do any dividend payment. As I said, in quarter three, we will restore the salary restructuring. Till that time, I don't think it proper to pay dividend.
No, sir. I'm not talking about quarterly payouts, but in general, like you plan to increase payout ratio in sync with the industry-
No, no. We have a payout ratio in mind, and as we have always talked about, closer to 25%. We take a view in terms of any specific needs around it. Roughly, we have been in a position to do the payouts in that range.
25%?
Yes.
Thank you, sir. That's all from my side.
Thank you very much. Next participant is Madhu Babu from Centrum Broking. Please go ahead.
Sir, just on the EV theme, I think a lot of players emerging from China as well. Could you talk about the new clients that you've settled on China and all that in terms of the EV theme? Obviously, there are a lot of other companies coming trying to focus on the EV. On that, how can that be a driver? Second, in terms of-
Madhu, there is a disturbance. If I'm not mistaken, your first question was, any customers or new customers, new wins that we are seeing from China as a geography. Was that the question?
Yeah, on the EV, electric vehicle side.
On the electric vehicle. Okay.
I'll answer this question first and then we'll take your next question. In general, as you know, China is the first one to bounce back. It was the first one to be impacted. We have seen a weak kind of a recovery in China, at least for a short period of time, for sure. We are very optimistic about our growth in China. At this point in time, there are enough opportunities and enough conversations that are going on that gives us the confidence that during the course of the year. We have already added three new clients in China in the last one month. We'll build on the existing clients that we have and we'll also build our business based on the new acquisitions.
Coming specifically on the electrification side, the business that we are getting, it cuts across all the three areas, largely on the autonomous side. There is the middleware component for the electrification, where we are extending help, and some opportunities on the connected side as well. It's a fairly balanced business, the opportunities that we are seeing in China. Does that answer your question? I wasn't sure whether we understood your question properly.
Yeah. That was the question. Second, on the capital allocation, just any plans for adding another adjacent vertical, because I think vertical concentration has, though it is a good vertical to be in, but on the semiconductor or anything on that, or why not explore a buyback? Because the current stock price is a bit undervalued, and this could be the right time for looking at a buyback, a one-time buyback.
Two, three things. Number one, I feel that the reason we came out of a substantially larger entity to a smaller entity is to focus and become the best in this globally. That's what is our passion and vision. That's exactly what we are going to do. We believe there is a huge headroom for it. There are certain, of course, some temporary times, we believe that there is a lot of work and lot of opportunity for us in multiple ways. One is even the number of strategic customers. We are very careful that we work with really the best one and who have a high market share and are dominant in a particular segment in passenger cars. Commercial, actually, we started last year, we brought a focus on commercial. We had a good success. We believe that will also grow over the period.
It may not necessarily be this year, but beyond this, we see a significant opportunity in technologies like autonomous, et cetera. People think that that's where it will get deployed first. There are multiple areas in that. In the new mobility sectors also, or micro-mobility, or there are many other areas which are evolving. We call it new mobility. I think we believe there is a lot to achieve. We'll be focusing on this and we'll make the investment which are necessary for this. We will not be, right now, focused on any other way apart from this. To your second question, we are not looking at any other capital structuring or buying back or et cetera.
Okay, sir. Thanks.
Thank you, Madhu.
Thank you very much. Anyone who wishes to ask a question, you may press star and one. Next question is from Dipesh Mehta, from SBICAP Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks for the opportunity. A couple of questions. First, can you help us understand how much impact in Q1 was because of supply-side issues? Where because of the challenges which we face in terms of work-from-home kind of setup as well as client approval, and because we have a lab-related requirement which impacted our revenue?
To answer your question, the impact because of work from home, that was negligible. I think for us, the transition was very good. Nothing that was not significant to even mention.
Okay. Even from client approval perspective, no kind of implication, only that is largely reflected weak demand kind of thing.
As Mr. Patil explained earlier on, our clients have had a rough quarter with almost seeing 50% year-on-year degrowth. It was a tough period for them. Yeah, our clients decided to obviously reorganize their expenses, and we are tracking all of those, and we believe that 60% of that will definitely come back before the end of this year.
Understand. Second question is, I think some of your peer indicated about some of the autonomous-related programs spending is showing some kind of cut and unlikely to return back sooner. If you can help us understand what we are witnessing in autonomous program, and how the spending pattern and clients' priorities, whether any change we are witnessing?
Yes, Mr. Patil explained earlier on, autonomous will be an area of significant growth for us going forward. All of our existing conversations about the future programs are still on. Especially in Europe, it's a priority for many of the OEMs and also the tier 1s. We think that it will be an area of growth for us from our perspective.
Just to add a little bit on this. Autonomous includes level 1 to level 5. Most of these programs which are postponed are level 4 and level 5. There is enough work for till level 3, which is called ADAS, driver assistance. There is enough work in that area. We believe actually next three, four years, there will be more work in ADAS scene.
Okay. Second, another question is about the consolidation opportunity, which we highlighted last time. We are seeing some of the consolidation opportunity. What progress we have made, and if you can help us understand size of such opportunity, because I think the two large deal which we suggested seems to be new business kind of thing, rather than we have replaced someone.
No, I think I don't know whether you joined a bit later, but I talked about the current quarter's deal, which includes consolidation of vendors. Of course, it includes means some displacement. Of course, our value proposition seems to help us for customers to go with us for that reason.
Understood. The last question is about this MicroFuzzy. I heard you suggested about 95% right now, which we own. This quarter, how much we incrementally bought it for the consideration which we paid roughly around INR 17 crore?
We bought about 12.5%.
The remaining 5%, it would be proportionate, or there are some milestone and payment term might be different?
We have said that the maximum payout for that balance 5% would be about EUR 3 million.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Next question is from [Ankit Puraria] from VEC Investment Management . Please go ahead.
Thank you for the opportunity. I hope everything is well at your end and with all the entire team. Just wanted to get a hands on, if you could throw some color on typically what is a forward guidance on any contracts that come up for renewal or completion for FY 2021, if you could just give us some color.
There is nothing significant in that. There are, of course, programs come for renewals and this, but there's nothing significant. Most of our renewals for some large contracts are in place. We cannot call out any significant renewal, which is coming in the next few quarters.
Okay. Thank you. Sir, could you throw some color on other expenses? Typically, what line items are contributing heavily on other expenses? Would the R&D expense also be part of the other expenses? What typically quarter on quarter are we incurring for R&D expense? If you could just give some color on that.
Other expenses do not include R&D expenses. Other expenses include typically what we incur on our facilities and some of the other expenditure on staff. The R&D expenditure for the company ranges between the same percentage as we had in the last year, and it is not part of the other expenses.
The majority of our R&D cost is people cost, and that is captured under the head Employee Costs.
Okay. Sure. Any patents that we filed in the last quarter or the quarter before?
Patent.
Not really. Last quarter, we have not filed any patent.
Okay, sure. Thank you. That is from my end, and all the best.
Thank you.
Thank you
Thank you very much. Next question is from Senthil Kamaraj, ithought Financial Service Consulting. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. First is on the powertrain. Could you give some color of share between ICE and the electric, and just overview about how electric powertrain is driving the growth?
Overall, electric powertrain portion is higher than conventional powertrain. I think, of course, electric powertrain business is growing very fast. On the normal conventional powertrain, we have been in a position to maintain the business with more in some kind of hybrid business also. Hybrid technology is also part of that as well. We see that in markets like U.S., it is still quite significant. I don't know whether you saw Audi's announcement last month, which talk about they expect at least two revisions to their powertrain technology. It is still there, and we just ensure that we have a higher share and maintain our business, but the growth is primarily coming through electric powertrain.
Okay, sir. Second question is, considering the current stress in the auto sector, do you see any opportunities for acquiring companies or any plans to do any inorganic acquisitions?
We will do an acquisition only if we think it will give us a significant strategic advantage. I think we have the ability to get to a customer in a very short period. Any customers, we are confident that due to our competence and the niche, we will be in a position to get to any customer. Unless we see a significant area of specialization by the company, and which we believe we will not be in a position to quickly match. I think that remains the only area where, if and when we do it. It is not a real focus of the company. As and when it comes along through certain opportunities, we will look at it. We are not looking aggressively in terms of acquisition strategy.
Okay, sir. Yeah, thanks.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. A reminder to all the participants, you may press star and one to ask the question. Next question is from Vimal Gohil from Union Asset Management. Please go ahead.
Yes. Thank you once again. My question was on MicroFuzzy. If you could just highlight what is the total outlay for this particular asset, and what has been the revenue for MicroFuzzy over the last couple of years?
The total outflow would not be more than EUR 23 million, including the last one that I talked about, which is about maximum about EUR 3 million. That's going to be the maximum outflow for MicroFuzzy.
What would be the total revenues here?
It's difficult because when we did the acquisition, the revenues were under EUR 10 million, and we have grown multifold those revenues over the years. Today it is difficult to say what is MicroFuzzy revenue, what is KPIT. I mean, it is completely integrated. Most of our electric powertrain practice contains those revenues, but it is integrated with KPIT revenues.
In a short way, I can say it is more than four or five times for sure.
Absolutely. Okay. Thank you, sir. All the best once again.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Next question is from Rahul Jain of Dolat Capital. Please go ahead.
Yeah, hi. I wanted to understand if you could tell us about how most of your key clients are positioning in terms of their own spending. You were talking about that in most cases you are winning market share. How do you see their overall pie shaping up for this year and plans forward? Also, in terms of their own, any change in their overall thought process? Initially we were more looking towards shared mobility, and now probably the new trend could be personal mobility. Any change in stance by the vendors also, clients also, in terms of how they want to repurpose their future plans on products launches and anything else?
Let me answer that question in terms of the three sub verticals that we have, because all of them have different strategies. When it comes to passenger cars, obviously their prioritization today is the future technologies. It's electrification connected, the three things that we do. That is their prioritization. They're prioritizing their spend on software, at the expense of the other spend that they have. That's a clear trend that we have seen in all passenger car OEMs. When it comes to commercial vehicles, I think commercial vehicles have also started to follow the same trend. Mr. Patil talked about commercial vehicles bringing autonomous vehicles. That has become a priority for them. Essentially, again, software is becoming the center for them, too. The last vertical is new mobility, micro mobility.
I think what COVID has done is it's turned the whole model upside down, and now people are trying to figure out what's the right model going forward that will benefit the consumer. At the same time, it makes sense, it becomes in terms of business, a viable model. That wasn't the case pre-COVID. Things are unfolding, and we are also trying to see what it means to our business and where we can create value for them. Those are the three distinct, sort of across the three verticals, those are the kinds of trends that we see. In a nutshell, software continues to be the center of their spend. They have to prioritize the spend on the newer technologies, and somehow do more with less when it comes to their other expenditure. Does that answer your question?
Yeah, it does. Primarily what I can conclude is, they are indecisive on the new mobility side, and it's more like a status quo on the passenger and commercial side. What I was also looking, maybe it's a bit premature right now, but the way, I don't know, of course, this is not the right indicator, but the way our market is also valuing our businesses in the auto industry, which are more futuristic versus the conventional players, is also maybe indicating that there is a trend toward lesser mobility overall and whatever limited is probably toward electric or autonomous side. With this thought process in mind, do we see any significant opportunity as well as challenges in the way our, this T21 customers are looking into their own future?
As far as these T21 customers are concerned, clients, all of them belong either to the passenger cars or commercial vehicles at this point in time. I think the whole reason why KPIT decided to de-merge was to really focus on the future of the technologies in the automotive mobility part. We believe that trend will continue. Nothing has changed due to COVID. I think people have reprioritized. Some things have gotten accelerated. That's the only shift that we have seen. Other than that, as you pointed out, the two trends, and there is a third one too, which is electrification and autonomous. I think people will continue to push that. The third one is the connected part, which actually goes hand in hand with autonomous, right? There is no autonomous unless there is connected. The value of that decreases substantially.
We believe that the trend to spend more on these three things at the expense of others will continue, both across passenger cars as well as commercial vehicles.
Just a small bit. If you see some of the news flow around 5G technology also, wherein probably it get bit deferred because of the pandemic factor, do we see any impact of the adoption of this technology hampering the way people would like to work on the autonomous side? Or you think even the higher level spends would not be any way linked to this infrastructure? Or you link the two because level 4, level 5, as Kishor said.
Yeah
are postponed?
Yeah. I think it's a very valid question, and you answered the question. Essentially, the spend on autonomous 1 to 3, especially what we call 3, will continue, and I think it'll get prioritized. People are going slightly slower on the level 4 side and definitely much slower on the level 5 side. Level 4, level 5 is where you actually need 5G. For the first 3, I think the existing infrastructure is adequate.
Fair enough. Thank you. That's it from my side.
Thank you.
A reminder to all the participants, you may press star and one to ask the question. Next question is from [Ankit Kororia] from VEC Investment Management. Please go ahead.
Hello. Sorry. Thank you for taking my question again. Just wanted to get a head around, if you want to look at your forecasted EBITDA margin, would it be better to look at it from the eyes of the verticals or the practices that we have?
We look at them from both sides. I think it's important for us to have a very granular view on both sides. We'll continue with that. That's how we've been doing it for the last one and a half years. We'll continue to do so going forward.
Sure. Could you give us some color on what would be, say, if you were to look at, say, passenger vehicle versus commercial vehicle, would we be able to granularly say that passenger vehicle tends to be more accretive than, say, commercial vehicle and the same in terms of our practices?
To be honest, it's hard to differentiate. I think there are similarities, and the margins are also similar. Now, new mobility is a different ballgame, and our business right now is very small in that area. Between commercial vehicles and passenger cars across the practices, they behave very similarly from our profitability perspective.
Okay. Sure. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you
Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for today. I will now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments.
Thank you for your participation on the call, and you take care and stay safe. Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. On behalf of Dolat Capital Market Private Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.