Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to Quess Corp H1 FY 2025 earnings conference call hosted by IIFL Securities Limited. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star then zero on your touch-tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Balaji Subramanian from IIFL Securities. Please go ahead, sir.
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning, and thank you for joining us on the post-Q2 FY 2025 results conference call for Quess Corp Limited. It is my pleasure to introduce the senior management team of Quess Corp who are here with us today to discuss the results. We have Mr. Guruprasad Srinivasan, Group CEO; Mr. Kamal Pal Hoda, ED and Group CFO; Mr. Kushal Maheshwari, Head, Investor Relations and Strategic Finance; Mr. Lohit Bhatia, President, Workforce Management; Mr. Gurmeet Chahal, CEO, GTS; Mr. Anand Sundar Raj, President, OAM. We will begin the call with opening remarks by the management team, and thereafter, we will open the call for a Q and A session. I would like to now hand over the call to Mr. Kushal Maheshwari to take the proceedings forward. Thank you, and over to you, Kushal.
Thank you, Balaji. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining Quess Q2 FY 2025 and half-yearly FY 2025 earnings call. The information, data, and output shared by the management during the call is forward-looking and subject to prevailing business conditions and government policies. All forward-looking statements are subject to economic growth or other risks faced by the company. The results and the presentation have been uploaded on our website. Please refer to slide number two of investor presentation for the safe harbor clause. With that safe harbor, I will now hand over the call to our Group CEO and ED, Mr. Guruprasad Srinivasan, for his opening remarks. Over to you, Guru.
Thank you. Thank you, Kushal, and wishing everyone Happy Dhanteras and thanks for joining us today. Let me start by giving you an overview of this quarter before moving on to respective platforms. I am pleased to share that during the quarter, we crossed 6 lakh head count, which is a milestone achieved by very few companies in private sector in India. We were at 3.5 lakh levels during COVID in FY 2021, and since then, we have grown the business organically at a remarkable scale and added close to 2.5 lakh associates. Coincidentally, this also marks our 17th anniversary, and we take pride in scale which we have achieved, particularly as one of the youngest companies in the world to reach at this level. Over the past few quarters, we have been consistently delivering predictable financial performance, along with broad-based growth across platforms.
We have been delivering healthy revenue growth accompanied by margin expansion, which has resulted in nonlinear growth in profitability. Over the past year, we have identified key improvement areas and growth streams in our business segments. These focused initiatives have helped us to boost productivity and strengthen our key financial metrics. Moving on to quarterly financial performance, I am delighted to share that we have delivered a steady performance with revenue of INR 5,179 crore and an EBITDA of INR 196 crore. EBITDA margin expanded on year-on-year basis by 23 basis points. Moving on to key financial highlights for the quarter. We reported a consolidated revenue of INR 5,179 crore, a growth over 9% year-on-year. We delivered an EBITDA of INR 196 crore, a growth of 16% year-on-year.
Our year-on-year improvement in margin was led by reduction in foundit cash burn levels and outcome of productivity and improvement initiatives leading to cost optimization. For the half year period, we delivered a revenue of INR 10,182 crore and EBITDA of INR 384 crore. Margin for this period was 3.8%, reflecting a year-on-year improvement of 27 basis points. Key financial highlights for H1. We added 42,000 in headcount and closed H1 with about 6.09 lakh employees on rolls. Our net addition of 42,000 in first half of this year is significantly higher than the net additions of 56,000 that we added whole of FY 2024. We recorded a consolidated revenue of INR 10,182 crore, a growth of 9% on year-on-year basis.
We delivered EBITDA of INR 384 crore, a growth of 17% on year-on-year basis. As of H1, Quess had its lowest gross debt levels of INR 253 crore with a reduction in gross debt by INR 117 crore and net cash position of INR 334 crore at H1 closing. Operating OCF to EBITDA conversion improved to a healthy 86%. Let me now walk you through specific platform-wise updates. I would like to start off from Workforce Management. The platform headcount grew to 498,000 with around 15,000 associates added during the quarter. This includes approximately 40,000 employees who are serving notice period. In over last three and a half years, headcount in workforce has been doubled from 239,000 in end of FY 2021 to the current levels. Revenue for the quarter increased by 13% year-on-year and 3% quarter-on-quarter.
EBITDA margin remained stable at 2.44%, with the top line growth driven primarily by general staffing. The platform added 128 new clients during the quarter, contributing to an overall ACV of INR 100 crores. I would like to share some more details specific to the general staffing. The business added 15,000 associates to its headcount during the quarter, largely led by demand from BFSI, logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors. The pace of headcount addition was slower, mainly because of delay in festivity season hiring in Q2. Typically, the season starts in August, but this time we witnessed that the season actually picked up in mid of September. At the end of Q2, we have 22,000 open mandates as we exit Q2. We have open mandates, which is about 22,000, largely from manufacturing, telecom, and BFSI segments. General Staffing business added 74 new logos during the quarter.
During the quarter, we also completed our vertical restructuring, both in terms of leadership and process. We will continue to invest in strengthening our sales, account management, and sourcing across each vertical. As I mentioned in my previous discussion, this approach helps us to augment our ability to offer customized sourcing, improve customer retention, and optimize fulfillment, creating a competitive advantage in the industry. Approximately 70% of our growth addition in Q2 came from tier two cities and beyond. This is an indication of our industry-leading geographic presence and sourcing capabilities that we have developed across India. We have made significant progress with Jobspot, which we had called out in our previous quarter as well. This is a mode to serve recruitment hotspots for prospective job seekers around key manufacturing clusters. Jobspot in Hosur, Narsapura, and Chakan are fully operational.
We have opened a new Jobspot in Tirupati in early October. We are witnessing strong interest from employers due to the proximity of Jobspot offices to industrial areas, as well as the candidates, since we facilitate easy walk-in. Going forward, we plan to expand this to other supply states in eastern and northern parts as we believe manufacturing vertical will be a major driver of headcount growth. The other major business as part of workforce is the IT staffing. Headwinds in IT/ITES sector continued in Q2. To an extent, it affected our hirings as well. However, we reported a growth of net addition of 240 that was supported by GCCs. Over past years, GCC has increasingly established their presence in India. We streamlined our GCC operations by verticalizing key industries and strengthening our sales and delivery expansion.
In the current environment, when IT staffing remains subdued and demand appears to be stabilizing, we continue to focus on GCC and niche hiring to enhance our margin profile. Our open mandates are robust, exceeding about 1,400, which is three times our monthly onboarding rate. In terms of Overseas Staffing, we experienced a muted quarter, mainly because our largest market, Singapore, is undergoing headwinds due to visa restrictions that is affecting our headcount growth. In contrast, our other major business region, which is Middle East, registered strong growth. We remain optimistic that given our strong presence and agile leadership in regions we operate, we will see upward trend in near term. Let me now move on to Global Technology Solution platform.
GTS achieved a revenue growth of 2% sequentially and 7% year-on-year basis with an EBITDA margin for the quarter at 17.5%, comfortably within our target range between 17%-18%. The highlight of the platform are as follows. The customer lifecycle management business continues to follow a strong trajectory, achieving 18% year-on-year growth and 4% sequential growth, driven by domestic and international operation. Also, CLM vertical registered a robust growth with over 70% of its business coming from international market during the quarter. While services in connect clocked a growth of 14% year-on-year led by demand from BFSI clients. Investments are made to strengthen the automation, analytics, and GenAI capabilities since CLM is expected to drive significant growth going forward. The non-voice BPO business remained flat year-on-year but experienced an 8% sequential increase following seasonal week in Q1. The collection business demonstrated a good growth momentum.
Going forward, the margin improvement will be a key focus area. The EXM payroll business processed about 4.3 billion payslips in Q2, with 6% quarter-over-quarter growth and 13% year-over-year growth. The platform secured an order book over about INR 117 crore ACV, added 53 new customers in the process. Key driver for this growth was specifically from e-commerce and the BFSI segment. Moving on to operating asset maintenance management. The OAM platform recorded a revenue growth of 9% and an EBITDA growth of 6% year-over-year. Over the past years, the platform has strengthened its leadership and sales capability. Although margins have declined on year-over-year basis due to these investments, there has been a quarter-over-quarter improvement in margins as well from the sales penetration and push. Driven by growth in margin-effective business such as F&B and telecom active infra segments.
I would like to share some more key highlights of OAM business. The OAM platform added a total 48 new customers, resulting into ACV of INR 44 crore in Q2. IFMS vertical was primarily driven by education and ITES sectors. The F&B also improved as educational institutions resumed post their academic breaks. The telecom active infrastructure business recorded its highest ever quarterly revenue, experiencing significant growth to the development of 4G and 5G networks by the telecom operators. Moving on to Product Led, which is now largely representing foundit on the platform. foundit business registered a healthy growth of 11%, while also decreasing its cash burn levels year-over-year basis. We are also experiencing significant traction and positive feedback on the foundit 2.0 platform from both candidate and recruiters. Recruiters have expressed their confidence and witnessed highest ever job on the platform, reaching nearly 9 lakh.
CSAT score remains healthy at 90% on the candidate front, and number of active users from past six months have increased to 25 million. I have an interesting announcement to make. We are excited to welcome Jasprit Bumrah, India's leading fast bowler and top-ranked player in ICC men's player ranking across all three formats of the game, as brand ambassador for our staffing vertical. His exceptional journey in cricket, driven by relentless dedication, resilience, and pursuit of excellence, aligns with the value that we champion at Quess Workforce Management. Our demerger plan are progressing as per schedule. We have received NOC from stock exchange, and the first motion with the NCLT has been completed with shareholders and creditors meeting scheduled on December 9th.
Since the announcement of our demerger in February, we have been strategically investing in people, technology to enhance our leadership capabilities, driving improvement in both sales and internal process within each platform. With these investments and healthy financial and operating performance, we are confident that each of these three entities, Quess, Digitide, and Bluspring, will become the market leaders in their respective industries. I will now hand over call to Kamal to give you more updates on financial for the quarter. Kamal, over to you.
Thank you, Guru. I will first take you through headline financial numbers before delving into segmented performance and other topic updates. During the quarter, we delivered a revenue of INR 5,179 crores with a growth of 9% year-on-year and 4% quarter-on-quarter. EBITDA stands at INR 196 crores, a growth of 16% year-on-year and 4% quarter-on-quarter. Our operating margin is at 3.8%, which is 23 basis points higher on a year-on-year basis, driven by business improvements and focus projects carried out in last one year and reduction in foundit burn. On a sequential basis, the margin held steady. Profit after tax increased by 32% on year-on-year basis, owing to growth of EBITDA and reduction of interest costs. While it declined 15% on quarter-on-quarter basis to INR 94 crores due to one-off gain from divestment of LMC business and interest on tax refunds in the previous quarter.
EPS for the quarter is INR 6.1, a 26% increase on a year-on-year basis in line with the tax growth. For the half year period, EPS was INR 13, up 63% year-on-year. One of our core focus areas in optimizing capital structure and improving sustained operational efficiency is our commitment towards debt reduction. As of H1 FY 2025, gross debt stands at INR 253 crores. We repaid INR 117 crores in H1 FY 2025. Net cash position stands at INR 334 crores, improving 142% on a year-on-year basis. Our operating cash flow improved 78% year-on-year to INR 245 crores, with operating OCF to EBITDA conversion at 86% on a half-year basis. Moving on to platform-wise updates. Starting with Quess Workforce Management, we delivered a top line of INR 3,747 crores, which is a 13% year-on-year and a 3% quarter-on-quarter growth, driven primarily by General Staffing. IT staffing was steady, led by BPO hiring.
EBITDA for the quarter for this platform is at INR 92 crores, a growth of 5% year-on-year and 4% quarter-on-quarter basis. On a year-on-year basis, EBITDA margin has contracted by 18 basis points to 2.44%, due to muted growth in Singapore market and wage inflation, and an increase in General Staffing revenue mix, which stands at 84% from 82% a year ago. Moving on to Global Technology Solutions platform. The platform clocked a revenue of INR 625 crores, an increase of 7% year-on-year basis and 2% quarter-on-quarter basis due to robust growth in voice and platform-led businesses with improvements in the non-voice business. EBITDA margin was largely flat on a sequential basis at 17.5%. We continue our focus on higher growth from international geographies in CLM and on margin improvements in non-voice businesses. Coming to Operating Asset Management platform.
It delivered a revenue of INR 768 crores, a growth of 9% year-on-year and 6% quarter-on-quarter. Growth were attributed towards Foots and Telecom Infra. Operating margin for the quarter is at 4.84%, declining 14 basis points on a year-on-year basis due to investments towards sales and leadership, while it improved 4 basis points sequentially. In the Product-Led business, adjusted for our divestment in QDP, revenue for the quarter was INR 39 crores, a growth of 12% year-on-year. foundit sales growth was 11% on a year-on-year basis. EBITDA was a INR -8 crores with cash burn at significantly lower levels on a year-on-year basis. Moving on to demerger updates. We are progressing on track towards the proposed three-way demerger of Quess Corp.
After we filed NCLT application in August, post stock exchange approval, NCLT on 22nd October disposed the first motion application, giving directions for convening meeting with equity shareholders and unsecured creditors on 9th December. Strengthening our internal processes and leaderships are the key work streams before the demerger, and we are hopeful of completing the entire demerger process by Q1 of next financial year. With this, I conclude our financial results and pass back to the moderator for taking your questions. Thank you.
Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wish to ask a question may press star and one on their touchtone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a minute while the question queue assembles. The first question is from the line of Mr. Balaji Subramanian from IIFL Securities Limited. Please go ahead, sir.
Congrats on a good set of results. My question was, while your consolidated EBITDA growth is 16%, looks quite healthy, but I can see that a lot of it is driven by the loss reduction in the PLB platform and the other three segments, the EBITDA growth is just in mid-single digits, like 5%-6% on a year-over-year basis. That is probably because of the OAM and GTS Solutions seeing single-digit revenue growth. How do you expect What is the outlook going forward? Once the PLB business turns EBITDA positive later this year, how do you see the console EBITDA trajectory in future? The second question is on the core to associate ratio. There has been a steady deterioration on that count. What exactly is happening here and going forward, how should one think about it?
Sure. I will take this one. Balaji, hi. I think both the questions are interrelated, so let me take the first part of it. I mean, you are right. Product-Led business, if you look at it, our burn is in line to the plan, and it is coming. Last full financial year, we had a cash burn of about INR 56 crores, and this year by H1, we are in a range of about INR 16 crores- INR 17 crores. As we enter Q3, it should further come down and exit of Q4 is when I think we will definitely be in a breakeven state. So we are on course to our plan there. Of course, it is also helping us to better our overall EBITDA percentages and back to EBITDA there. Coming back to specifically on the question that you asked for the growth from WFM and GTS.
Let me start with WFM. WFM has been by headcount, if you look at last full year across Quess, we added about 56,000, of which almost, I would say about 90% comes from WFM, which is specifically General Staffing there.
This year, by H1, we have added about 42,000, of which, again, in the same ratio, comes specifically from the General Staffing business. While we are mindful that quote-to-associate ratio has to be healthy. However, the size where we are, and we got to invest more onto our sourcing engine, because on an average, we lose anywhere between 5%-6% through attrition and backfill has to be done. We have built this engine almost 10 years + now, very aggressive engine across in terms of capability of hiring faster, quicker to our customers, and we continue to invest in that phase a lot. Few specific callouts there. One, of course, due to being seasoned, we have increased our recruiter base in General Staffing. So 100 + recruiters incremental that we have added.
Plus, we have Jobspot that we have been calling out, investing, specifically focusing on to be precisely closer to the customers in manufacturing segment. So there, we are investing. Plus verticalization that we have done. As I called out in my previous Q1 as well, vertical strategy is extremely important, and we have to be more precise to the boundaries and boundaries that customer operates. For example, BFSI, we have 120,000 people. Manufacturing, we are close to 70,000 people. Consumer retail is almost about 200,000 people. So we are also building a tower specifically to focus and also focus growth by vertical. That's how we measure each of our businesses internally. From that standpoint, these investments that we are doing, we are confident that it is going to realize well as we move forward. This is an interim that it will bring down the quote-to-associate.
However, as we move forward, each of the pillar in itself will have its strengths to grow at a different percentage and phase as we move forward into FY 2026. Coming back to GTS, they are on course. GTS has been growing on high single digit, and that's also in line to our plan. We're not seeing any surprises there. Their ACV, if you look at for Q1 as well and Q2, pretty strong. The number of logos, almost INR 100 crores of ACV that they have signed in Q2 itself. Q1 also, we had called out almost about INR 83 crores. So they're on course in terms of their plan. Hope this answers quote-to-associate as well as foundit and WFM question that you asked.
Yeah. That more or less answers my question. That is it from my side. All the best.
Thank you.
Thank you, Balaji.
Thank you very much. The next question is from the line of Vikas from Antique. Please go ahead.
Hi, sir. Very good morning. I have a couple of questions. The first one is, this quarter, headcount addition was lower than usual 15,000 hires we typically see each quarter. Was this mainly due to we hired more than 20,000 in Q1, so there were some base effects. How should we anticipate headcount trend in the second half of the year? That is number one. Secondly, on IT staffing, in the presentation, it says GCC contribution in Q2 is at a 68% by revenue. It has actually declined from 70% to 68%. I thought in the opening remarks, you said GCC again did better than IT staffing. I was little confused here. Can you please explain on that as well?
All right. Vikas, with regard to the headcount, yes, Q1 definitely was a good opening, and we added 30,000 +. Q2, I think I specifically called out this time we have seen season start a month later, so generally we would have ramped up. The mandates would have come in July and ramped up. The deployment would have happened in the month of August. We saw a slight delay there, and the actual onboarding was done in the month of September. It also benchmarks to the Diwali around. Because post-Diwali, after three to four weeks of Diwali, there will be a rehiring also that will happen. So specific hiring that came in. To your question, first and foremost, a month delay. So that has impacted the onboarding, and hence we were able to achieve about 11,000 net adds.
While we have done 11,000 net add, the gross add will be at least three times of that. So 3+x . So net add is what we will consider in terms of reporting. In addition to that, the sector that has given us a boost specifically for Q2, is logistics supply chain. BFSI, we have seen slightly slowed down, and manufacturing also slightly slowed down. So manufacturing should be interim. It should pick up in Q3 for us. So we are seeing mandates coming up from manufacturing for Q3. On a quarter-to-quarter basis, I think overall Quess, we have been able to grow anywhere between 4% - 5%, and we would still continue to see that because both GTS and OAM will have a stronger Q3 and Q4. So from that standpoint, I think we will be doing good in terms of our growth overall perspective.
Specific to IT, to clarify our mandates which are coming in, majority mandates, almost 74% comes from GCCs. It is from GCC. We are not still seeing any green shoots coming in from ITES and IT services. Part two is, GCC contributing to the revenue is about 52%. Sorry, 68% GCC contribution to the overall revenue. We still see as we step into. In fact, we are ahead of plan specifically to IT staffing back in when we measured the business. Q3 also, we are seeing the net add and quality mandate which are coming in. So from that standpoint, the slowness in WFM is only from international staffing, as I called out, specifically from Singapore. Otherwise, India IT staffing, on back of GCC, I think we are quite confident.
Yeah.
Lohit, would you like to add some more color on IT staffing?
Sir, just one clarification also, the GCC contribution in the presentation is 68%, and last quarter it was 70%. I wondered that disconnect that why the contribution has dropped by 200 basis points for GCC.
68% is the overall contribution as it stands at the end of Q2. However, what Guru was mentioning was 74% of the new business is coming from GCC. I think every quarter that number you would see that it would eventually go up as the mix changes. I would also like to add a few more points. I think we had mentioned in the previous calls as well, that the entire mix for us is changing. If you notice from the last four years, from the pre-COVID time to today, I will just give you some estimated numbers. From 8,300 headcount, today we are close to about 6,000 headcount in the IT business. However, from the niche profile and from the higher margin profiles, from a low base of less than 3% contribution then, today the contribution is over 15%.
When I say contribution from higher niche margins, 15% means almost close to about 900 + headcount out of the 6,000, which contributes upwards of INR 50,000 and INR 100,000 gross margin PAPM. Our blended gross margin PAPM from this business is now at a record high of INR 19,000 per person per month. In comparison, you would remember that the General Staffing business hovers between the INR 680- INR 700 mark.
Okay. I will take it separately with Kushal. I think in last presentation it says GCC now contributes 70% of total domestic IT revenues, and it says now 68%. I was just getting confused there. I will take this offline. My second question is, last quarter we indicated that EBITDA was impacted by seasonality and wage hike. Then we guided for margin improvement in Q2. Can you break down where specifically we have missed on margin improvement as we only saw a marginal uptick? Also last year, we saw better margin performance in the second half of the year compared to the first half. Do we anticipate a similar trend this year as well? What are the key drivers if that is the trajectory going to take?
Vikas, Kamal this side. I will take up the margin questions. You pointed out rightly, so quarter three and quarter four are better quarters to us from margin standpoint. The reasons are primarily that in quarter one and quarter two, some of our high-margin businesses go through a cyclicality. The food business in the Operating Asset Management business, the telecom infra business, again, in the Operating Asset Management business, which are better margin business within the platform, go through a bit of a downhill in Q1 and Q2 due to the nature of the business, and then they come back strongly in Q3, Q4, which also we are confident of basis the present pipeline. Similarly, in our GTS business, in connect, the connection business does much better in Q4 and also the payroll business in HRMS business in all tech does better in Q3 and Q4.
Combination of these factors give us better margins in Q3 and Q4. Hence, we are hopeful that from the present 3.8% margin levels that we are reporting right now, we should inch towards 4% as we move into H2.
Vikas, does that answer your question?
Yes, it did. Just one small clarification. The improvement in margins we have seen, which is a marginal this quarter from Q1 to Q2, this is what we were anticipating or initially we thought the improvement is going to be much better. I just need one small clarification here, and thanks a lot and happy festive season to the management.
Thank you, Vikas.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Deep Shah from B&K Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thanks for the opportunity. One is actually a motivating question on the reclassification that we did between employee cost and finance cost. I did read the note, but if you could explain a bit better and then if this is going to be the way ahead or why was this done? That is first. Second, sir, we've seen a lot of noise or some substance on the GenAI affecting your BPO, BPM business. Could you provide some more clarity on what are the first interactions you're having? Is it affecting your pricing power? Is it affecting number of seats? How do you actually see this going ahead? Yeah. Thank you.
Sure, Kamal. This side. I will take the re-class and then on the generative AI question, I'll ask Gurmeet to step in. We did this reclassification after benchmarking of how good governance organizations are presenting it. The accounting standards do allow a choice of accounting policy in terms of presentation of the interest cost on the defined benefit obligation to show it either in employee cost or to show it under finance cost. We have chosen the latter as a change in accounting policy. We have done this change, and it has been done with a retrospective effect because all accounting policy changes have to be done with a retrospective effect. It has had no impact on our profitability. It is just a change of presentation.
To the extent that it has impacted employee cost, it has had a very similar effect on the finance cost. From a profitability standpoint, this has had no impact on the profitability of the firm. From a presentation standpoint also, we have reclassified all our prior year numbers to give effect of this change so that the numbers are comparable for all prior periods. On your question on GenAI and its impact, I would request Gurmeet to respond.
Hi. Thank you. This is Gurmeet here. For us, GenAI is an opportunity. That's how we are approaching it. As an organization, as you know, customer lifecycle management is a significant part of our business. We manage about 1 billion customer interactions every year. That means about three per second, 24 by 7, 365 days. There's a lot of experience that is within the organization. What we are doing is we are leveraging that experience, keeping the human in the loop, and building AI assets around it. We will be launching an overarching offering called Pulse.AI, which to start with, will have eight, think of it as Lego blocks, which could be used in unison or individually. We believe it will address a couple of challenges that the industry sees in this regard.
First of all, it will help us bring elastic capacity into operations because of the predictability. Second, 2x improvement in go-to-market for our e-commerce customers, up to 3x growth in sales. We believe with the improved customer service of 30% uplift in NPS and of course, all of this will also be able to deliver about 30%-40% cost savings, depending on how mature your underlying data assets are. Hopefully that addresses the question.
Deep.
Yeah. So, sir, you plan to launch this, so will it be rolled out over the next one year? How is the rollout plan and does it cater to a large client or it is something that anyone can use it or these are just very early conversations?
We have been doing the POCs for the last six months. Based on those POCs, we have been refining our offering. We plan to launch the first set in the coming quarter itself, and then gradually we will roll it out.
Sure, sir. Thank you so much. All the best.
Thank you.
Thank you, Deep.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Amit Chandra from HDFC Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks for the opportunity. My first question is on the margins for the WFM segment. Obviously you have provided the clarification, but from my understanding, the margins year-over-year has been down and sequentially also it has been almost flat, right? Despite the increasing contribution of GCC, which I suppose it is at a higher margin. Can we assume that the core General Staffing margins have been coming down and still there is no respite to the margins for the core segment within WFM? Also, the sourcing component has been going up, okay? The transfer component has been coming down. In general, if you explain whether the higher sourcing can also lead to lower margins.
Sure. Amit, to start with the margin, we were, I mean, 2.6%, and we partially cut down to about 2.4%. There are multiple pointers there. One is of course, as part of the demerger process, we are also strengthening each of the platforms. So we are, A, hiring the capabilities for the back office and all of that for each of the platforms. Number two, specifically for WFM, I spoke about verticalization. We have been investing because we believe the investment for future in terms of
How each of these vertical are going to represent and will have its trajectory of growth. Just to give you an example again, for us, the manufacturing is about 70,000. We intend to drive this, and it has an opportunity in itself to cross about 200,000 over a couple of years from now, right? To build that, you've got to get the right structures in place, the processes in place, the challenges that between segment to segment is very extremely different. So we got to make those investments in IR, being closer to customers, specifically when I take manufacturing. Then consumer retail hiring is extremely different than what we do for manufacturing. So from that standpoint, from future standpoint, we are strengthening the verticals. So verticalization will help us to get the competitive edge as we move forward. So that's the second investment post the demerger. Third, GCC.
Hiring for GCC versus hiring for IT services is extremely different. The quality of recruiters, we do not hire freshers here. They are minimum upward of about three to eight years of experience. To hire them, to get them to a striking ratio in terms of onboarding is something that you need a better quality of recruiters to handle it. The last one here is the international mix in terms of. Just to give you an overall, if we take overall WFM EBITDA, 50% comes from General Staffing, 50% comes from all other staffing. Of which balance 50%, which comes from all other staffing, 23% comes or 21% comes from international. International comes at a very high EBITDA margin level. Singapore currently not hiring has also got few basis points down in terms of the EBITDA margin.
From margin perspective, the levers for us to work on to continue is, A, of course, international recovery. B, as we get volume coming in coming quarters, it should come back to the levels where we were, and then slowly we should see how we can graduate from thereafter. I will pass on to the next question that you had.
On sourcing versus.
Basically on sourcing versus.
Transfer.
Yes, we have seen. Sourcing engine is doing well. I will hand over to Lohit to take this question.
Yeah. Thank you, Guru. Before I come to the sourcing versus transfers, let me put some perspective because I think there seems to be a concern on WFM margins overall. At 2.44%, we are slightly softer by about 15, 20 basis points against our medium term last couple of quarters at about 2.6%. Having said that, the business has largest 84% contribution coming from the general staffing India business. At 2.44% margin, we are already beating industry averages by at least 2x. The nearest anybody in the industry would be performing would be at half the margin rates of what Quess is delivering at almost 50% higher headcount and revenue both. That is the first part. Let us keep that in mind in context to the delivery from Quess. The second point, which I must add, as a team, our WFM long-term margin trajectory North Star remains at 3%.
We have not moved away from that North Star, but that is a long-term North Star for us. Where do we want to get into the medium-term is back to the 2.6%, 2.65%. What contributes is three large levers for us. The General Staffing business, which hovers between the 1.92% margin. The International business, which erstwhile about a year ago, prior to the regulatory and visa tightness in Singapore, internationally used to contribute between 6%- 7% EBITDA margin. India, which used to again contribute between the 6% - 7% for professional staffing. The good news here is that while the decline of Singapore has completely been overtaken by our focus and advent into GCC, as far as India professional staffing is concerned. Today, our India IT business is contributing upwards of 9% EBITDA margin, which is a record high for us for this business.
Unfortunately, it happened at the times when international or mainly Singapore has declined from 6.5% to 4.5%. What would have otherwise aided in a 20 basis point margin expansion has just offset what has happened in Singapore. I just wanted to give that perspective. Guru is right about the verticalization, the investment in sourcing and the other things. I will come back to the point on sourcing versus transfers. Transfers always add to immediate uplift in gross margin. It may or may not aid your margin percentage expansion because generally large transfers also come at flat fee and those flat fees, typically if it is a collect and pay, actually drags your margin downwards. Sourcing on the other hand is more sticky.
Once you do sourcing, the customer cannot easily replace or that account cannot be easily replaced by somebody else because that's the investment that we are doing on those majors. The third element that we must add here is Quess has been looking into the manufacturing space for the last three years in a very serious manner. Today we have about 70,000 - 75,000 people just in the manufacturing space, thanks to our verticalization. 265 dedicated core resources work here. As we expand in manufacturing, while our margin percentage might go up a bit, our core to FT ratios and other ratios might come down.
I'm sure all of you understand when we are dealing with services customers, managing 400 - 500 associates with one core is possible, but when you're managing manufacturing, typically you have to give shift supervisors, you have to give IR and ER professionals, you have to manage compliances at the factories. A typical core to FT ratio comes down to 1: 200. So it's a blended mix. Quess WFM is almost at the cusp of 500,000 professionals. Our long-term vision is to be 1 million. To be able to do that, we need to focus on our verticalization. This is not a short-term game. We are in here for the long term, so I hope you can see it with that perspective.
Yes. Thanks for the elaborate answer. It is clear now. The second is on the foundit segment. Obviously, I know firstly on the breakeven part, earlier you mentioned that you're going to break even this year. In the first half, there is an EBITDA loss of around INR 16 crores. So how are we going to navigate that? Secondly, on the investments and the sales growth. Some more clarity on how we are seeing, because the sales have been almost flat sequentially and year-over-year also it's not that encouraging, but how the various metrics are panning out and how we can compete with giant here, because in platform business it's very difficult to establish yourself when there is such a large player that is there in the system for so many years.
What initiatives we have taken and where we are there in those initiatives and with those investments, how we plan to break even?
Sure. Amit, first and foremost, we keep getting this question specifically on winner takes the market, which probably, I think we are not seeing that to be really true. What happens is the job seeker needs a job, and they do not specifically go after one specific platform. Wherever they can maximize, they will come onto that, which is also kind of proof in terms of the profile updates that is up by 61% year on year since foundit, from almost 3 million to we have touched almost about 7 million in terms of the profile updates. Our job postings have gone up by 141% year on year.
The 2.0 application that we have launched, we have done quite a lot of pilots and the large customers have been migrated on this, received very well, and our CSAT pipe from the candidate side is also almost 90% + up. These are a few, I would say, positive indicators why the platforms will do well, and it is also reflecting on our burn reducing by actual revenue increase that is happening year on year. We have grown about 12%. Having said that, you are right. It is also slightly soft because of few factors. 60% of our revenue comes from the IT sector, which in itself has reduced its hiring. IT services contributes a major and even that segment has, I think 60% has come down.
The second is placement agencies who are the second largest set of subscribers who come onto this. Smaller staffing companies are still not spending as before. That is the second call-out that we have seen. Singapore market again has an impact on foundit because we cater to the Asia market as well. Still we see caution in terms of spending. It is also leading to longer sales cycles. Plus, of course, with the candidate services which continues to grow, we have seen in India specifically the candidate services growing, and new product launch which has been received well. IT services about 60% slowing down has impacted on our growth. It can do better as we release, I think as we step into the upcoming quarters. We are seeing good order book coming in for this.
A, winner takes all market, we have seen the other way around, so we are really not stressed about it. B, we are waiting for IT services to open up for this segment as well as the international boundaries as well. Otherwise, we are confident from the order book to see how the Q3 and moving towards the break even for Q4. Just to give you a little math there, our cost is around INR 45 crores per quarter, and we are hovering around INR 39 crores, INR 38 crores-INR 39 crores of revenue, so we are not too far from the break even. Hope that answers your question.
Yeah, sir. Thanks and all the best for the quarter.
Thank you.
Thanks, Amit.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Deep Modi from Equirus Securities Private Limited. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks for the opportunity. I have couple of questions. Based on the commentary given by several IT companies in recent result calls, there is a gradual recovery in demand led by the decreasing interest rate. Whether we see improvement in demand in IT service within Quess Workforce Management going forward as well? Is there any chances to improve the margin within Quess Workforce Management led by this?
More or less, Deep, this question has been answered. I will ask Lohit to give you some more color on IT staffing and the margin for Workforce Management. Lohit, if you can just give us some more input.
Like I was mentioning, there are three large businesses that we have split into. There is the General Staffing business, which is just hovering around a little sub 2% EBITDA margin. However, it still continues to be nearly 2 x the industry average of the nearest competitors. The second large business for us is the international or the APAC business. International and APAC used to be hovering between 6%-7% EBITDA margin. However, subdued because of the last one year of regulatory and visa compliance issues in the Singapore market. The third mix in the business is the IT staffing in India. IT staffing currently in India, we have about 6,000 resources. But consistently for last four years, we have been working towards higher-end niche segments. We have changed our customer mix. We have gone after GCCs in a big way.
Hence, the slowdown of the IT services industry has not really impacted us. Rather, we have changed our mix towards the IT niche segments from the GCCs itself. Today, our average open mandate and open book in IT business is about 1,500. You would be glad to know that about 75% or three-fourth of them primarily come from higher margins, and GCCs itself is the open book, and that is almost 3x of our monthly onboards. So our monthly onboards being at about 500, we have an open mandate, open book of about 3x that size.
Okay. Yeah, it clarifies. Thank you. My second question is, how we leverage our opportunity on government's focus on job creation, which was held in the month of July in the Union Budget. Is there any update on the fine print from government side, and how we see the impact of same in this staffing business?
The employment-led incentive schemes, as announced by the government in July, have undergone massive amount of consultation. We have participated as industry leaders and as part of industry bodies with the government at various levels in various forums. According to our understanding, the government has taken consultation from all the industry players, aggregated all the points of view. Obviously, their focus continues to be to move from informal to formal. More importantly, the government is focused towards the right measurement, that once the rules are out, and hopefully they should be out very shortly. Once the rules are out, the measurement has to be very simple, and it should be from one source of truth. That's what the government is working towards. At this stage, I would not be able to answer on behalf of the government.
I can only say that the industry consultations have happened at appropriate levels, and we feel that we should hear about the rule guidance very shortly.
Okay. Thank you very much. Wish you all the best. Thank you.
Thank you, Deep. Thank you, Lohit.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Chintan Sheth from Girik Capital. Please go ahead.
Yes. Thank you for the opportunity. Just a bit on the DSO days overall, we have seen from March to this quarter, first half has increased a bit by three days or so. Even the collection has been pretty robust and our cash flow has been pretty strong. Secondly, on the government incentive scheme that you talked about a bit just before that. It's still not implemented fully? What is the expectation in terms of that incentive scheme also one of the contributor to our overall margin profile going forward?
Sure, Chintan Kamal here. I'll take the question. On DSO days, the DSO days actually has been flat. In fact, on a quarter-on-quarter basis, we have seen a one-day increase in DSO, but on a March to September basis, it has been flattish. We have had internally active working streams across all businesses, and from back of that, we've been able to report an 86% OCF conversion to EBITDA. Which has actually led to a significant reduction of our debt levels. We mentioned our commentary that INR 117 crores of debt repayment that we have done. So it's not at a very alarming level and as management, we are confident of bringing the DSO days further down.
On the government incentives, I think Lohit did explain that so far we are still awaiting the detailed guidelines from the government, and hence there is no portion of our present reporting numbers which includes these proposed government incentives because the detailed guidelines of the ELIs are expected next month, and that is when it should start impacting the business results. So in the present H1 numbers, there are no impact of any government incentive schemes.
But by year-end, you expect this to get implemented and some benefit to start accruing in our numbers. That's fair to assume?
Chintan, as we explained on the call, there has been massive consultation post the budgetary announcement, and we are hopeful and awaiting the detailed guidelines as to when it comes. The major impact is towards first-time employment, and it's also towards the direct benefit transfers, which should happen towards the fresh employment. Being the largest player in the industry in this space, we believe that it should benefit our business. But we await the detailed guidelines, and once the guidelines are out from the government side, we'll be able to comment more on this.
Okay. If we look at the change in the accounting on the employee and in finance cost, if we axe that or reverse that, the EBITDA numbers will further have some flat on a sequential basis, but the improvement won't be that large. What is reported after the adjustments which we have reported during the quarter. One thing I also observed was the SG&A spend, which was a little elevated this quarter, largely related to the job postings and the hotspots which we have talked about. It's part of that SG&A. Is that correct understanding?
Sorry, can you repeat your last question again?
The SG&A spend for WFM has increased to 6.2%, versus it was hovering around 5.8%.
SG&A.
SG&A, right.
Yeah. Chintan, let me again-
That trend to continue, how should one look at it?
Yeah. On the interest and the classification of interest cost on defined benefit obligation from employee benefits to finance cost, I think I explained in one of the previous question as well that it has had no impact on our profitability.
Correct. Data entry.
In the accounting policy also, we have had a retrospective application. The quarter-on-quarter EBITDA growth that you see is apple-to-apple comparable because in all our prior year numbers also, we have done a reclassification. On the SG&A cost going up, I think both Lohit and Guru briefly covered that the investments that we have made in the verticalization across our sectors and also due to festive hiring, the additional recruiters that we hire leads to a bit of an increase in our SG&A cost towards Q2 and Q3, and then it gets normalized back in Q4. We don't expect it to be at these levels, and we hope that it will come back to the previous levels reported. Some of these also include investments that we are doing as part of our strengthening of the leadership and sales owing to the demerger process.
It's a combination of three, four things that we explained over the call, but we are hopeful that we should be able to pull back the SG&A cost to the normal levels in the upcoming quarters.
That cost will also aid our margin.
Yeah.
That can be even. Got it. I will join back in case. All the very best. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. As that was the last question from the participant, I now hand the conference over to management for closing comments.
Over to you, Guru.
All right. Thanks to everyone for joining us again for this Q2 earnings call. Your question and feedback have always been valuable, and I would like to reiterate that we remain committed to grow the business across all operational and financial metrics while unlocking value for our shareholders. Before we conclude the call, I would like to wish each one of you and your families a joyful festive season ahead. Thank you.
Thank you very much.
On behalf of IIFL Securities Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.