Earnings Call: Q3 2018

Oct 19, 2018

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Aker BP's 3rd Quarter Presentation in 2018. And I'm used to saying this, but this has been another eventful quarter for Aker BP. And as we announced a couple of weeks ago, we have ended up with a production of 151 1,000 barrels of oil equivalents in the quarter. This was somewhat below expectations and I'll come back to the main reasons for this later in the presentation. In the exploration area, the quarter was characterized by quite high activity as we see exploration activity both in Aker BP and on the Norwegian continental shelf picking up. We had 3 dry well cat wells in the quarter, but the appraisal wells on Hans was encouraging and GECO, which I'll come back to in a little while, was very encouraging. I'm also pleased to report that the Aholdi development project, the many development projects that are progressing in Aker BP is going according to plan. And as Alexander will revert to, we now expect CapEx for 2018 to end up lower than previously assumed. On the financials, I guess the numbers are largely where they should have been given the production volume, the oil and gas prices that we've seen in the quarter. But just to remind you, EBITDA was $736,000,000 up 1,000,000 from Q2 and at an all time high for the company. Free cash flow ended up at a solid 2 $40,000,000 or $0.67 per share, more than 2x the $0.31 per share in dividends in the quarter. And when it comes to dividends, when we have paid out the last dividend in 2018, we would have delivered on our $450,000,000 dividend payment in 2018. And as I am sure you are aware, we intend to increase this by 100 dollars 1,000,000 each year going forward until 2021. We have also made 2 acquisitions recently, which we will cover in more depth a little bit further in the presentation. And finally, we will give you a glimpse of for the first time of the Ula redevelopment plan, where which all the development project in Nula is tied into inclusive of the new acquisition of King Lear. But now I will give the floor to Alexander, who will walk you through the financials. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. This quarter, we recorded income of US1 $1,000,000,000 on a production of 151,000 barrels of oil equivalents per day. We realized an average oil price of $77.88 per barrel in the quarter, which is up 2% from the previous quarter. And we had a gas price of $0.30 per square cubic meter, which represent an increase of 8% from Q2. We also booked a one off tariff compensation at Eula of $23,000,000 this quarter and this is included in other operating income. Production expense was $165,000,000 in line with the previous quarter. Overall, we had a production cost per barrel of $11.90 a small increase from $11.40 in Q2. In the Alvheim area, we had production costs of $30,000,000 or $5.60 per barrel. On Iberosen, we had costs of $19,000,000 This equals $8.80 per barrel and is slightly below the average year to date, which is $8.90 Vallhalla and Hud production costs amounted to $57,000,000 slightly up from Q2 when we had some non recurring credits. Production cost per BOE for the quarter was unchanged at $17 at Valhall. Now despite the lower production we've seen on Skarv in the quarter, production per BOE for the quarter was actually down $1 to $11.30 This equals a cost of $24,000,000 and the reduction here is mainly driven by less workover in the quarter. And finally, production costs at Eula Tambor increased by 4,000,000 dollars this quarter ended at $32,000,000 and this is equivalent cost of $34 per barrel. This gives us an EBITDAX of $830,000,000 And the exploration cost for Q3 was $94,000,000 This is an increase of 18,000,000 dollars The increase is mainly driven by the fact that we had 3 dry exploration wells this quarter compared to only one dry exploration well in the previous quarter. Also, we had booked additional costs relating to the Nuaka field evaluation this quarter. We've also expensed $30,000,000 in seismic acquisitions for new surveys this quarter. This is the same level as in Q2 and most of the seismic acquisitions in the Q3 is around existing hubs in the North Sea, but we've also acquired some new seismic up in the Norwegian Sea. In addition, we had the usual area fees and other exploration costs that make up the balance of the $94,000,000 EBITDA was then 736,000,000 dollars Depreciation this quarter was $189,000,000 or $13.60 per barrel. We had net financial expenses of $58,000,000 This is higher than in Q2, when we had some positive FX changes then, and we also had some realized and unrealized losses on derivatives this quarter. Profit before taxes was SEK 490,000,000 and taxes amounted to SEK365,000,000. This gives us a more or less unchanged tax rate of 74.5%. With the positive development in oil prices, our tax rate levitates towards a marginal 78% tax rate. The tax effect of uplift reduces the tax rate for Q3 down from 78%, but the tax effect of financial and other items taxable at 23% drives the tax rate up. So the tax expense here is made up of payable taxes of 219,000,000 and a change in deferred taxes of 146,000,000 €125,000,000 for the quarter. When we turn to our balance sheet, we see that there are no significant changes in goodwill or other intangible assets. Net of depreciation, the total PP and E balance increased by $204,000,000 to $6,000,000,000 in the quarter. Receivables and other assets were 752,000,000 at the end of the quarter, a decrease from the previous quarter of $68,000,000 The $1,600,000,000 tax loss that we acquired from Hess Noriga is sitting as a short term tax receivable, and we are still expecting to see a disbursement of this tax loss in the Q4. Cash and cash equivalents were $127,000,000 at quarterend. In total, our assets amounted to $12,400,000,000 at September 30, which is approximately the same as we last quarter. Equity was SEK3.1 billion at the end of the quarter. This is an increase of SEK 19,000,000 during the quarter with a positive net results for the period of SEK 125,000,000 and a positive currency translation adjustment through OCI of 6,500,000 was partially offset by the 112,500,000 dividend payment. Other provisions for liabilities increased slightly to SEK 3,000,000,000. Deferred tax amounted to SEK 1,670,000,000. This reflects an increase of SEK 146,000,000 from the previous quarter. This quarter, the change can be primarily explained by capitalized exploration cost, interest and actual decommissioning costs that are expensed for tax purposes and a higher tax depreciation versus accounting depreciation. Book value of interest bearing debt consisting of bonds and bank debts was SEK3 1,000,000,000 at quarter end, while other liabilities were relatively unchanged at SEK857 $1,000,000 Our accrual for tax payable was $754,000,000 at the end of Q3. The most significant items here are the 2018 tax payable of SEK 508,000,000. Dollars We had a remaining tax payable for 2017 of $42,000,000 that we expect to pay in the Q4 and we had a accrual for uncertain tax positions of 202,000,000. Cash flows from operations were $697,000,000 in the quarter. Cash flows from investing activities totaled $457,000,000 of which around $340,000,000 are investments in fixed assets. Johan Sverdrup was the largest contributor with $97,000,000 Then we had Vallal Hod, which accounted for $90,000,000 and Alvheim, which saw $61,000,000 of investments. We also recorded the commissioning payments of $72,000,000 mainly related to the Maersk municipal rig doing P and A work at Valhall and we also capitalized exploration expenses here of SEK45 1,000,000. Thus, free cash flow was $240,000,000 in the quarter. This free cash flow for the quarter more than covered the $112,500,000 dividends payments and a $50,000,000 repayment on the RBL. At the end of the quarter, our cash balance was SEK 127,000,000. Book value of net interest bearing debt was SEK 2,850,000 and we now have SEK3.6 billion of committed undrawn capacity on our SEK4 billion bank facility. Net debt over EBITDAX was lowered again and is now just under one times. So with 9 months of the year behind us, we are making some slight adjustments to our full year guidance. We are still expecting production to average between 155,000,160,000 barrels per day. However, we see the risk skewed to the downside of this range and into the lower half. Production cost is expected still to be around $12 per We anticipate spending to be higher coming into the Q4, but due to a mix of strong performance and phasing of projects, we reduced our CapEx guidance to approximately $1,250,000,000 When it comes to spending on abandonment, we reduced our estimate from 350,000,000 dollars to 250,000,000 the last time we met in July. The Mexican Linswil rig has completed its current P and A scope by the end of this quarter with spending so far this year at $226,000,000 There is not much abandonment scope in the Q4 and therefore we expect spending here to come within the 250,000,000 mark. Then when it comes to exploration activities, we increased our estimate from SEK 350,000,000 to SEK 425,000,000 earlier this year on the back of the success that we had seen in the Frosk area and the fact that we secured a rig that would drill additional wells in the area. Due to late arrival of said rig, we anticipate that one of the wells here will likely slip into next year, therefore decreasing the spending in the current year. Our revised guidance is therefore set at SEK 400,000,000. So in totality, we are then at a total spending of SEK 1,900,000,000 versus our initial guidance of SEK 2,000,000,000. So before I turn it over to Carla, just a couple of words on the recently announced transaction. Since mid July, we have announced 2 asset acquisitions. They both represent attractive opportunities for Aker BP and they strengthen our position in strategic areas around our existing production hubs. All licenses acquired have tie in potentials to our own hubs. In July, we announced an acquisition of 11 operated licenses from Total for a consideration of 205 $1,000,000 This acquisition adds more than 80,000,000 barrels of oil equivalent of resources net to Aker BP. Trel and Trina are 2 discoveries that we plan to tie back to the Alvheim FPSO, while Rind is a discovery that is part of our Nuaka development scope. The Alvheimur discovery represents an opportunity for a tieback to Skav FPSO in the Norwegian Sea. Then earlier this week, we announced the acquisition of 77.8 percent of the King Lear discovery in the Southern North Sea. Total consideration was $250,000,000 and we expect that the total resource potential from this transaction to be in excess of 100,000,000 barrels of oil equivalent net to Aker BP. Our plan is to tie this discovery back to Ula, thus providing injection gas to the Ula field and this will increase oil recovery from Ula. Now I will turn it back to Karlan to walk you through some of the operational highlights. So thank you, Alexander. So I think I'll start doing my usual tour of the assets and licenses, but I will this time spend some more time on a few exciting topics. So first of all, let's move to Alvheim. Alvheim continues to be a significant success story for Aker BP. When it comes to operational performance in the quarter, this was a very solid quarter despite a very high activity level across the license and we delivered a production efficiency of 96%. There are of course lots of things to say about Alvheim, but I think that this time I'll draw your attention to a recently drilled well, the Chameleon infill south well, which we are about to tie back to Alvheim and expect production to commence shortly. Now this was the first well drilled by the Floater Alliance, which you may remember consists of Aker BP, Odfjell and Halliburton. And it is a significant step change in performance and technology over the wells delivered on Alheim in the past. This is the first well drilled with wire pipe, which meant that we could increase drilling velocity and drilling speed in the reservoir section. And this well was drilled with up to 90 meters an hour in the reservoir section, which is approximately 3 times the 30 meter an hour limit that we have on usual technologies. This is the first use of gas traces to get better control over the gas flow in a multilateral well, and it's 2 of the longest branches ever drilled on Alfven. More than 10 meters of reservoir section was actually drilled in as well and 7,920 meters of lower completion was installed. The well was completed 11 days below our initial estimates. And more importantly, as work was carried out with the Diepzistelwager, which is a 6th generation rig, we have saved approximately 30 to 40 days over the usual 3rd or 4th generation rig that we usually have used on Alvheim. So in my mind, this actually proves that the strategy we have chosen with an alliance to drill these wells, shorten well planning time and to choose high end 6th generation rigs is really successful. Then we are working to develop Tral and Trina that we recently bought and then Alexander walked you through as a tieback to the Alvheim FPSO. This will most likely be carried out as a fast track project. However, the development needs to be seen in conjunction with the GECO appraisal that we just drilled. And this, of course, is a brilliant segue into the next generation of Alvheim successes. So approximately a year ago, we drilled the Frosk exploration well or the Frog exploration well, if you want, which was significantly more volumes than we expected and being currently in the range of 30 to 60. We have also in the second quarter talked about a test well in this discovery and we are now announcing that this has been approved and will be drilled in the upcoming drilling campaign. We will drill a bilateral test producer into Srog Main and drill 2, possibly 3 pilots with exploration potential in addition to the test producer. In addition, we will shortly commence on a in the other prospects in the area, the Frog Leg and Tadpole. And just to reiterate the numbers, Frog Leg will have a predrilled range of 44,000,000 to 153 1,000,000 barrels of oil equivalents and Tadpole 45,000,000 to 147,000,000. The chances are in the range of 40% to 60%. The Frog Leg will commence in 2018, whereas the commencement of the Frosk test producer is determined by the arrival of the long lead items in the lower completion. 2, possibly 3 pilots into Frog Leg Northeast and Frog North, all delivered within 1 year and again demonstrating the power of the Subsea Alliance ability to turn around and deliver these Alvheim. We have recently completed an appraisal well on Alfheim. We have recently completed an appraisal well on Gekko and the results, I must say, is extremely encouraging. Very good reservoir qualities, a thicker oil column than we predicted, around 6.5 to 7 meters of true vertical depth and good reservoir properties. We see the resource potential as being in the range of 40,000,000 barrels and it's very likely that this will be tied back to the Alvheim field. Just to put it into context, this is approximately twice the size of Bola and 4 times the size of Skogel that was sanctioned last year. The most likely development solution will be 2 multilateral wells tied back to a manifold and we see breakeven of this project below $30 per barrel. At Valhall, the operational performance has been decent in Q3 with a production efficiency of 80 8% and production increased to 36,000 barrels, up approximately 7% from Q2. Most of the reduction in production efficiency was related to well work and the plant itself has performed very well in the quarter. However, the production is slightly below our plans and the reason was delayed start up of new wells. This delay was caused by technical problems during testing of a new well stimulation method, where the new equipment got stuck in the well. The problems have now been solved and we are back on track to deliver more production growth at chalk reservoir, which need fracking or fracturing to produce oil. The well cost is distributed approximately 60% towards drilling of the well and approximately 40% towards the fracking of the well. The traditional method is very time consuming and each frac stage needs to be done separately using coiled tubing. We have been looking for ways of accelerating this significantly in order to increase the number of wells drillable on Valhall, increase the resources and increase the economic performance. And we have taken inspiration from the U. S. Shale. The single trip multi frac method is designed to perform multiple fracking stages in one operation, which means shorter time to production, lower cost per well and allow for more fracking stages per wells and hence higher well productivity. Theoretically, we see an opportunity to reduce time consumption of fracking operation with approximately 90% or down to oneten of the time, which when you account for the fact that this is 40% of the total well type is a significant saving, a step change. And the step 1 is to get the single trip multifactor work and step 2 that allows for optimization and debottlenecking of logistics and other parts of the value chain. So in total, we're really excited about this technology and we'll continue to develop it in order to increase production and resources and reserves on the Valhall field. Now talking about continuous improvement. We have now completed the P and A campaign at Walhalla and the results are on the chart that you can see right now. You can see a very visible continuous improvement strategy at Hall. This program, as previously announced, was concluded earlier this month and the rig is now back to drilling on Walhalla Flank North. The average time on the left side of the chart here is 62 days. The average on the right hand side of the slide is 29, which basically means a doubling of efficiency. And this takes into account that the gray bar accounts for the most complex P and A wells on Valhall, which we obviously left for last to maximize learning effects. Now as I said, the rig has moved on to Valhall Flank North, where it's drilling water injection well as a part of a project to increase oil recovery by approximately 8,000,000 barrels. The water injection is planned to start in Q2 next year after pipelines and rises have been installed. And of course, the Valal Frank North injection project is organized and executed according to Aker BP's alliance model. Now moving on to the last development project on Valhall, the so called Valhall Frank West. It's progressing as planned with excellent performance, excellent HSE results and well within budget. The current engineering and construction activities is focused on supporting the top side construction of the wellhead platform at Vardal Norway. And the project remains on track for installation in the summer of 2019 and production start in the Q4 next year. Now moving on to Ula. We will give you a first glimpse of the Ula redevelopment plan. I will come back with more detail in the Capital Market Day in January. The ambition is to expand the Ula Lifetime to beyond 2,040 and by a combination of IOR measures, tie ins, exploration and lifetime extension significantly increase remaining potential. We see a potential to more than double the existing resources by this new program. And as you can see, there are many activities in this program. Some have already commenced. We have already tied a new flotel into Ula to accelerate maintenance and construction activities to allow for lifetime extension. We have already placed gravel packs near Ula to tie a rig into a jackup rig into Ula in 2019. And there are also other activities ongoing. We are planning for new wells on Ula between 5 to 6. It's a combination of IOR wells and a redistribution of the VOG scheme. In addition, there is a Triassic horizon at Ula, which currently have only 1 producer in it. We plan to expand that. And we plan to tie existing discoveries in the area, particularly the Kark and the Ula Noor back to Ula. And then finally, we plan to tie King Lear back to Ula both to utilize capacity but also to utilize the gas for water alternating gas injection. And then, of course, as we've done on every single other asset, we also plan to explore having completed our assessment of the region. Now moving on to King Lear, the key issue with King Lear is the perfect synergies it has with Ula. So first of all, Ula consists of an excellent tie in opportunity with sufficient lifetime, sufficient export capacity and more than enough infrastructure capacity to carry out the King Lear production. The resource range, we are reporting in the range of 60 to 170 gross volumes that is. NPD is reporting at roughly like 100. The gas to liquid ratio is 60 to 40. And we have, as Alexander already talked about, acquired 77.8% interest from Equinor inclusive of the operated stake. The reason that we are so engaged in getting this tie back to Ula consists of the fact that this is a rich gas. So the rich gas will have significantly better properties when it comes to water alternating gas ejection schemes than the dry gas that are currently used on Ula for this purpose. In fact, the efficiency is more than double of the rich gas versus the dry gas that we're currently using. And as previously announced, we actually see this as a significant uptick in the resource potential connected to the King Lear acquisition. All this will be explained in detail in the Capital Market Day, but I think the highlights is very clear. Long life duration than 2x the existing resources as potential for the new expansion program and a significant activity level is needed to deliver this expansion program. Now this is exactly the same recipe as we've used on Wallhall previously and is currently ongoing at Valhall. Moving on to Ivarossen, the production has been relatively stable in the quarter. The platform itself has an excellent uptime of 98% and production efficiency ended up at 92% and the discrepancies are negatively impacted production efficiency by power generation issues at the Edvard Grieg host. We have also completed drilling of 2 new water injectors in Iverossen, which have increased mass balance and we're now at the positive mass balance at Ivarossen, which have reduced GOR and increased production somewhat. During the quarter, we have also drilled an appraisal well at Hans. The well basically confirmed confirmed the pre drill estimates, which we and Hans will be developed as a tieback to Eevaossen. The investment decision is planned for next year and we currently anticipate production start in 2021. Moving on to Skov. Production was down roughly 15% from Q2 to Q3 and this was mainly driven by gas volumes. The liquids volumes were far more stable. In Q2, we experienced some technical issues with the gas injection system, particularly related to the gas injection motor. And this led to temporarily higher gas exports in Q2 than in Q3. However, in Q3, we have injected more gas than normal to reestablish reservoir pressure and hence gas exports was slightly down in Q3. The Afro development is progressing as planned. The first phase currently in execution includes 3 new wells in the southern part of the field tied back to the Skov FPSO using a trace heated pipe in pipe flow line, actually the first and the longest one of its kind. Addition to the existing A1 test producer in Afl. Now production from these new wells are planned to begin late 2020, where the second phase of the development is now being matured towards the Concept Select in Q1 2019. Alexander previously talked about Alvenur, which is among the discoveries that we recently bought from Total. Alvenur is located north of Skav or Afjul and we see this as an obvious tieback candidate to Skav to be matured following the Afun project. Johan Sverdrup is continuing steadily and Phase I facilities are now at 93% complete. The operator Equinor announced in August at ONS that the Phase 1 CapEx was reduced by NOK2 billion and are now standing at NOK86 1,000,000,000. The Johan Sardebrup reserve estimate was increased by approximately NOK100 1,000,000,000 and the most likely estimate now stands at NOK2.7 billion. And we're also finally seeing a 1 month acceleration of expected production start. Now the production start is expected in November 2019. Moving on to Phase II. We expect CapEx for Phase II to be estimated at NOK41 billion and Phase II start up in the Q4 of 2022. Moving on to Nuakka. As also discussed previously, we have increased our interest in the RIN discovery from 30% to 92% through the Total transaction. This is roughly in line with our ownership in the other licenses in the South of Olenaaka area. And we continue to prepare for a concept selection by the end of 2018. It is, however, fair to say that alignment of interest between the different licenses in the Nork area is less than optimal and this has slowed down the decision process. However, we remain convinced that our proposed development solution with we'll continue to work with our partners, suppliers and authorities to realize this concept. Now moving on to exploration. It has already been a good year with the frog discovery and the GECO upgrade, and we still have some very interesting wells left for the final quarter of the year. Hopefully, within the next month, we will start drilling the Frog follow-up wells on Prospect's Frog Leg and Tadpole. We see this as very interesting targets with relatively high probability of success and significant volume estimates. These wells will all be drilled with rig Skarabeo 8. Skarabeo 8 will then move on to drill the JK prospect in the neighborhood of Johan Sarderup and Iverossen. This is another very interesting well, although the chance of success is not as high as in the Fosk area. The spud date of JK may move into 2019 depending on rig arrival and the time it takes to complete particularly the Frog Leg and Tadpole wells. We also have 2 non operated wells coming up in Q4, including the large Jorgosun prospects near the Russian border operated by Equinor and the Cassidy project, which is located in the Oda license in the Ula area operated by Spirit. So in total, it seems like a very interesting exploration there. And of course, one more thing. We have not forgotten our digital 5 main crews focusing on production optimization, digital work, which basically means our ability to use digital tools in the yards and the front end of the business, smart maintenance, subsurface and drilling data architecture and improved HSSE performance. The digital lab in Stavanger is currently manned with approximately 60 professionals from Aker BP, Cognite and vendors and startups and other partners. There is significant digitalization work going on within drilling and wells, particularly related to autonomous drilling and automatic well planning and in projects related to the field of the future. All these crews work after the new so called agile method and develop continuously and a lot of interesting projects is already seeing the light of day. We continue to be extremely optimistic when it comes to the effect that these digitalization programs will have on Aker BP, our vendor space and the industry as large. And with that, I think the Q2 presentation is completed and we'll open for questions, first here in Oslo and then on the web. So I'll advise invite Alexander back on stage with me. Halvor Nygard from SEB. A question on the AbEx guiding. I know you're not changing your guidance today, but is it any reason why we shouldn't see AbEx come below €250,000,000 when it's no or low activity on the ecom in Q4? Yes. So spending thus far has been SEK 226,000,000. And in the Q4, the rig was a couple of days into and there are some other planning activities, etcetera. But we say it's going to be within 250. So if it's slightly below or but it's hard to see it go above the €250,000,000 So somewhere in between 226,000,000 and 2 would be my estimate. And a question on capital structure as well. With the current gearing and leverage ratio below 1, getting the tax loss and the cash from the Hess transaction in Q4, that will take down the leverage even further. And maybe you will have a too solid and maybe too robust balance sheet in some one size. Any reflections on the gearing level and an optimal capital structure and optimal leverage? Yes, sure. That could be a lengthy discussion. So the problem, if you will, of having a too low leverage ratio will I think we'll manage and we'll deal with it. But as you said, there's the rather significant 1,500,000,000 dollars bridge loan to finance that the tax part of the acquisition, which we hope to have resolved before Christmas And future and how that capital structure will look will Well, you've seen what we've done in the past. You've seen how we have developed that balance sheet and how we've managed it and how we've addressed different sources of capital in order to diversify. And for now, I think you should just expect us to continue on that path and keep developing that balance sheet. But no concrete thoughts on futures issuances at this point in time. And if you remember back in the capital markets in 2016, we also stated that we will work to get the gearing down and get the company last One last question maybe on the M and A market. You've done the King Lear deal earlier this week and the Total deal this summer. With the price environment now in a more healthier environment and also new entrants maybe bringing up competition. Is it harder for you to do the smarter and good deals? Or have you become a pure consolidator on the shelf, meaning you have access to other transactions or other deals that no one else has? Well, I think there are no answers to that question, right? But one way of looking at this transaction at least is that we're building on the access to infrastructure and the operated strategy that we have had around our hubs for quite a few years now. And that, of course, gives access to other ways of developing these fields and other upsides that you wouldn't normally see in an M and A market. And then secondly, we've always tried to be value driven when we think about these transactions. So that means that we will not go into transactions where we do not see industrial value regardless of whether that price environment is going up or going down. And we've kept that very simple view now through the down cycle and we'll keep that view also in the up cycle. And then of course, there's a lot of activity in the M and A space. But as the last transactions have proven, we have also demonstrated our ability to find value accretive transactions even in a high competitive environment. Taylor Nielsen, SP1 Markets. First a question on King Lear. Could you be more specific of expectations on potential first oil and development costs? Yes, I could, but I choose not at this point in time as we've just announced the acquisition. And as I said, we'll come back with more details in the Capital Market Day when we put all these plans together. Okay. Assuming that you will take a decision during next year, Karilijiket, how long time we should expect from this decision is taken until you will have first oil? That's basically the same question. But I think the generic answer when you look at the field development process that we've done elsewhere is that from the time we make a decision to a concept selection decision to 1st oil is somewhere in the range of 36 months. Okay. Thank you. Esker. And looking into 2019, as you highlighted, the remaining part of 2018 exploration program is exciting. For 2019, should we expect even more wells than what you have drilled in 2018? We haven't concluded on the drilling program in 20 18 and that's largely because some of this will depend on the discoveries in the last part of 'eighteen. But as a planning assumption, we are planning basically a flat activity program when it comes to wells from 'eighteen to 'nineteen. Okay. And then finally, just a minor question on the slight change you had on production guiding. Is that mainly related to the weak SKYY production in Q3 or other factors that close into that equation? We expect the Skagreb issue to level out over time. So we don't expect that to have a significant impact on the overall production in 2018. Most of the discussion around the risk is now related to delays of getting new wells on stream related to the testing of the single trip multi frac on Valhall. Yes. Then we have quite a number of questions from our web audience. First one is from Johan Charantong in Societe Generale and he has three questions. The first one is on CapEx. At this stage, would you be able to say what are the implications of both Nuaka related developments so far this year and recently announced deals with Total and Equinor for your 2019 CapEx and Expex budgets? I think it's a bit early to say. We would we will come back, as Karl alluded to, when we had a bit of time to incorporate our thinking in bit more detail on the newly acquired newly acquired assets. I think we are in the somewhat fortunate position to have lots of robust projects that we think are going to meet the $35 breakeven thresholds that we have. So there's good internal competition for capital, but we are in the midst of going through that process and will revert with more details when we get to the Capital Markets Day in January. Next question from Johan is on tax payable. Could you please provide some granularity on the $754,000,000 tax payable as of end of Q3? How much of this amount is related to uncertain tax positions? And I guess that was already answered in your talk, Alexander. So NOK754 1,000,000 that is sitting as booked as a tax payable in the balance sheet. NOK508,000,000 of this is related to the production and the account so far in 2018. Then SEK42 1,000,000 is a tax payable related to 2017. So the difference between what we paid and what is now due and that is expecting to be paid during the Q4. Then we have booked SEK 202,000,000 that's an estimate for uncertain future tax cases. The timing of those may not necessarily be within 12 months, but that is the estimate. Of that estimate, those are legacy cases from BP Norway, from Hess Norway and there are other typical you have uncertain tax cases. I think around 130 of those are related to Hess and then some from BP where there's a recourse against the seller in that case. So that's the mix that makes up that tax balance. And the third question from Joao is on changes in other current balance sheet items. Can you please tell us what items impacted the 3Q's $81,000,000 positive contribution from changes in current balance sheet items other than inventories, payables and receivables? So working So working capital changes between each quarter is somewhat challenging to estimate and give guidance on because there's lots of variables going into this. And it's us on behalf of partnerships and how we do the cash calls and how we plan for that and vice versa on the other side of the balance sheet. And in this quarter, we also had adjustments for over lift and under lift balances that go into this, accrued income. And there's also there will be prepayments that varies between each of the quarters. So very hard to pinpoint how that is going to play out in future quarters. But those are typically the items that goes into the working capital column in a company like Aker BP. Next question is from Alvin Thomas of Exane BNP Paribas. Is there any risk to you receiving the $1,600,000,000 tax rebate or is it purely a matter of timing? Okay. So let's just remind everyone that the 1.6 1,000,000,000 tax loss from Hess, that is historical tax losses. And that could either be monetized through normal course of business offsetting taxable income or in this case, we are asking that you can have that paid out in one go. So either way, that is the tax loss that we will be able to utilize in Aker BP. The timing is not necessarily given, but we still believe that through the normal course of how you do the tax returns in Norway and coming up to November December that we do not have any indication that we shouldn't see a payout of that tax loss. Yes. There is also a tax related question from James Jose of Barclays. On cash taxes, can you provide any guidance on what the cash tax payment will be for 4Q and for 2019 at current commodity prices? Yes. Lots of interest about tax. It's good. Tax is important. So, yes. So, back in May, June, we have to estimate what the tax the next 6 tax installments are going to be. We make an estimate then and saying for 2018, our estimate was that the 6 installments would be NOK1.25 billion. So on today's FX, that is around $160,000,000 There's 3 installments now in the second half of twenty 18, 1 in Q3, 2 in Q4 and then there's another 3 in the beginning of next year, every other month. So those will be the tax installments if we just follow that estimate. There's an opening that in January based on your experience and how you've seen this play out in 2018 in January, you can adjust the last three tax installments that you're paying in the beginning of next year. So those are the estimates. Then in addition, in 2019 we'll go again. Then based on 2019 you make 3 estimates for the latter part of 2019 and then 3 more into the beginning of 2020 and on and on. So that's the guidance on the tax. And then I also mentioned on the last tax question that there was $42,000,000 that we are expecting to pay now in the Q4 for 2017, just like we all do when you get your tax returns and there's a plus or a minus. Yes. And then there are actually a long list of questions. Many of them are related to guidance for 2019. And I guess it is a bit early to be precise on that. But do you have any general comments on your outlook for 2019 at this point? At this point in time, we'll there's so much happening both in terms of activity level, in terms of acquisitions that have recently been announced and in terms of our planning for 2019 and onwards, that I think will come back when it comes to guiding as we usually do in the Capital Markets Day presentation in January and prepare more details around activity plans and the impact it has on guiding in terms of expects, CapEx and OpEx for 2019 as we usually do. Yes, thank you. I think we'll draw the line there and to those on the web who have not got their questions answered, please contact us in the IR department after the presentation and we'll do our best to follow-up. Thank you. And an excellent day to everybody both here in Oslo and also those viewing from the web. Thank you.