Good morning and welcome to Aker Solutions' presentation of our second quarter and half-year results. My name is Preben Ørbeck, and I'm the Head of Investor Relations. Joining me today are our CEO, Kjetel Digre, and our CFO, Idar Eikrem. They will take you through the main developments of the quarter and the first half of 2025. After the presentation, we have time for questions. Those of you who are following the webcast can submit your questions via the online platform. With that, I leave the floor to Kjetel Digre.
Thank you, Preben. Welcome to everyone tuning in. As always, let me start the presentation with the main messages for today. First and foremost, I'm pleased to see that we continue to deliver solid financial results. The second quarter revenue was NOK 15.2 billion, which is a growth of about 20% compared with the same period last year. The EBITDA margin for the quarter was 8.3%. I'm especially impressed by our lifecycle segment delivering 30% growth with improved margins. This is a result not only driven by strong execution, but also continuous focus on improvements. In the renewables and field development segment, the legacy lump sum projects continue to be a drag on margins. The projects are scheduled for sail away in the second half of 2025, and commercial discussions with clients and subcontractors are ongoing. During the quarter, we continued to have high activity across our locations and markets.
The Aker BP portfolio is progressing as planned, with several important milestones met in the quarter. I would also like to highlight our achievements in the CCS market, where we celebrated the official opening and the first successful capture of CO2 at Heidelberg Cement's plant in Brevik this quarter. Lastly, we continue to have high activity within tendering and early phase studies, where we are maturing projects within oil and gas, decarbonization, and renewables markets. It is also inspiring to see how we are applying new technologies to solve energy challenges, for instance, during our operations with autonomous drones for inspection on Aker BP's Edvard Grieg platform. This is a clear testament to the innovation culture of our people and organization.
Speaking of people, I would like to take the opportunity to thank all our 12,000 employees for their continued dedication and hard work that has led to some great achievements in the period. Next, let me go deeper into some of the operational highlights of the quarter. I'd like to start with the Aker BP portfolio, which consists of four new platforms with a combined weight of more than 90,000 tons, as well as several projects within modifications and manufacturing of subsea equipment. A lot of the high activity that we are currently seeing at our locations comes from these projects. I'm glad to report that we met all key milestones in the period. One of these milestones happened at our yard in Verdal, where the large substructure for the Valhall platform was completed in June and later installed in the field.
This is another great achievement by Verdal, delivering complex steel structures safely and efficiently. I also want to highlight the work done at our site in Sandnessjøen, which recently celebrated its 50-year anniversary. In June, the 110-meter-long Hugin A flare was successfully lifted and moved out of the fabrication hall. Finally, at Stord, both the Hugin A and Valhall topsides are taking shape with the lifting and installation of several pre-assembled units completed as planned. To safeguard the delivery of these projects, Aker Solutions has invested in new technologies and digital solutions. These are not ends in themselves, but rather means of improving efficiency and safety in execution. By using Cognite Data Fusion as the main hub for our data ecosystem, we have been able to implement new ways of working, improving the project's ability to accelerate deliverables and mitigate risk.
Across the Aker BP portfolio, the Aker Digital Alliance has delivered on its ambitions to realize the target savings of about NOK 1 billion. This is quite an achievement. Going forward, the focus is shifting from the EPC phase to operations. Here, we see great opportunities to improve efficiency and reduce costs by using the Common Data platform and innovative industrial software applications. All in all, I'm very happy to see that Aker Solutions and our partners are making solid progress on the Aker BP portfolio. The achievements of the Alliance are a clear testament to the value of working closely together with aligned incentives, delivering quality projects with faster time to first oil. Let's move over to carbon capture and storage, a market where Aker Solutions has been present since the early 1990s.
Norway is one of the frontrunners in this market, supporting the development of a complete CCS value chain through the Longship project. In Aker Solutions, we are proud to play a key role in designing and building all the critical infrastructure for this important development. As mentioned, we recently celebrated the official opening and first capture of CO2 at Heidelberg Cement's plant in Brevik. This is now the first cement plant in the world with full-scale carbon capture capability. We have also started the work for the Carbon Capture and Storage facilities at Celsio's Waste-to-Energy plant in Oslo. Both the Heidelberg and Celsio projects are executed in collaboration with our strategic partners, SLB Capturi. On the storage side, Aker Solutions is currently engaged in the Northern Lights Phase 2 project, where the target is to increase storage capacity from 1 million to a minimum of 5 million tons per year.
OneSubsea, where Aker Solutions owns 20%, is also engaged in this development, delivering the subsea CO2 injection systems for the project. Going forward, we see interesting opportunities within the CCS market, where we can leverage our long-term experience and strong partnerships. According to the International Energy Agency, global capture of CO2 and the capacity of that is expected to increase almost tenfold over the next five years. However, this depends on the entire industry working together to reduce costs across the value chain. This is exactly what we are working on at Aker Solutions. For example, we recently launched an R&D initiative to improve cost efficiency through standardization, which is being implemented in live projects such as at Celsio's plant in Norway. While we are on the topic of cost, another way to reduce cost is to apply new technologies.
Aker Solutions recently reached an important milestone in the utilization of remotely controlled drones for offshore operations, and we have some footage we can show you. The drone operation took place on Aker BP's Edvard Grieg platform, while the drone operator controlled the mission from Aker Solutions' onshore control center in Stavanger. The resident drone system is located on the offshore platform and has autonomous navigation capabilities and advanced sensors and cameras collecting high-resolution data during inspection rounds. This achievement sets a new standard for the use of robotics, artificial intelligence, and digital technologies in offshore inspection and maintenance. Going forward, we see great opportunities to develop and scale this offering, enabling sizable cost savings for our customers. I think this is a good example of how Aker Solutions has always been a frontrunner when it comes to employing new technologies.
This innovative spirit is one of the differentiators we have when positioning for future opportunities. This takes me to the tender pipeline, which remains stable at more than NOK 80 billion. The pipeline is dominated by opportunities in Europe, representing more than 90% of the tender volume. We are also seeing increased local activity in the APAC region through our engineering hubs in India and Malaysia. We continue to see a good mix between traditional oil and gas, transitional solutions, and renewables opportunities. Within oil and gas, we are in the process of renegotiating several important long-term frame agreements. We are also working with our clients to mature future greenfield opportunities. Within renewables and transitional solutions, ambitions remain high. As mentioned, we see a lot of interest in our CCS capabilities, both in Norway but also abroad. Beyond cost, another key enabler is a functioning market for carbon trading.
An interesting observation in that context is that our client, Celsio, recently announced the sale of 1.1 million tons of permanent carbon removals to Microsoft over a 10-year period. Such agreements are critical for the commercial success of CCS, enabling new projects both in Norway and abroad. To summarize, I'm pleased to see that we continue delivering solid financial results while positioning the company for the future. We have a substantial order backlog for execution in 2025 and onwards. Together with our partners, we focus on delivering predictable project execution. We are active in tendering across segments, which allows us to choose carefully the opportunities we pursue. Finally, our financial situation is robust. This gives us a strong foundation to develop the company and generate solid returns for our shareholders. I will pass the word to Idar, who will go over the numbers in more detail. Thank you.
Thank you, Kjetel. I will now take you through the key financial highlights for the second quarter, our segment performance, and run through our financial guidance. As always, all numbers mentioned are in Norwegian kroner. Let me start with the income statement. The second quarter revenue was NOK 15.2 billion, up 18% from the same period last year. The underlying EBITDA was NOK 1.3 billion with a margin of 8.3%. If we exclude the income from OneSubsea, our underlying margin was 7.2%. The underlying EBIT was NOK 901 million with a margin of 5.9%. The underlying net income was NOK 693 million. Lastly, earnings per share was NOK 1.46. Next, let us have a look at the cash flow. Our financial position remains robust, with a net cash position of NOK 2.1 billion. Operational cash flow in the period was around NOK 400 million.
This was mainly driven by our EBITDA contribution from our operating segments and reversal of working capital of about NOK 520 million. CapEx in the period was NOK 135 million, or slightly less than 1% of revenues. The quarterly dividends received from our 20% stake in OneSubsea was NOK 145 million, in line with previous guidance from the company. Lastly, we paid out dividends of about NOK 1.6 billion, or NOK 3.3 per share, to our shareholders. This is in line with our ordinary dividend policy. Now, let's take a closer look at our segments. For renewables and field development, the second quarter revenue was NOK 10.8 billion. The underlying EBITDA was NOK 829 million, with a margin of 7.7%. As Kjetel mentioned, the legacy lump sum project continued to be a drag on the margins.
If we look at the order intake in the quarter, it came in at NOK 7.9 billion, or 0.7x book-to-bill. This mainly relates to the contract for steel substructure for the second phase of the BalWin HVDC project, as well as growth in our existing portfolio. The secured backlog was NOK 46.4 billion at the end of the quarter. Based on the backlog and market activity, we expect revenue in this segment to grow by 5% to 10% in 2025. For the lifecycle segment, the second quarter revenue was NOK 3.9 billion. This is a 30% growth from the same period last year. The underlying EBITDA in the quarter was NOK 275 million, with a margin of 7%. Order intake was NOK 2.9 billion, or 0.7x book-to-bill. The backlog was NOK 20.3 billion, dominated by long-term frame agreements and reimbursable modification projects with long-term customers.
Based on the secured backlog and market activity, we expect revenue in lifecycle to grow by about 10% in 2025. To sum up, in the second quarter, we continue to deliver solid financial and operational performance. As we have said before, the legacy lump sum projects have been both operationally and commercially challenging. These projects are all progressing for sail away in the second half of 2025. We have ongoing discussions both with clients and subcontractors to solve these commercial challenges. Based on our secured backlog and market activity, 2025 revenues are expected to exceed NOK 55 billion. The EBITDA margin is expected to be between 7% and 7.5% in 2025, excluding net income from OneSubsea. OneSubsea has the ambition to distribute more than $250 million to its shareholders in 2025.
At the current exchange rate, this implies a dividend to Aker Solutions of more than half a billion Norwegian kroner. CapEx for 2025 is estimated to be between 1% and 1.5% of revenue. Lastly, working capital is expected to normalize to between -NOK 4 billion and -NOK 6 billion over time. Thank you for listening. That was the end of our presentation. In a few moments, we will open up for questions.
It seems that there are no... There just came in a question from Victoria McCulloch in RBC. A few questions. Can you give us an idea of what some of the key milestones are for Aker BP this year? And how are they expected to impact the margins?
Yeah. We have a lot of projects with Aker BP, both offshore on the existing installations, subsea scope, which we are doing together with OneSubsea, but then also milestones linked to progressing the four platforms. Part of that has been to make sure that the substructure produced in Verdal is progressing well. Two of the two biggest ones are now installed offshore. The rest of the milestones are linked to gathering components and structures at our yard in Stord and Verdal to complete the topsides.
The commercial setup there is obviously to progress and have revenue around it, but then also some of the milestones are incentivized. So far, we are meeting the milestones.
Yeah, the last part of your question, how does it impact the margins? It's also, just to repeat, this is in the Alliance contract with Aker BP. We are well underway on that one. However, there are quite some incentives that normally you will see incentives of successful delivery at the end. We expect more the incentive part to be concluded in 2026 rather than in 2025.
Thank you, Idar and Kjetel. Following up on a few questions on the tender pipeline, what is the magnitude of CCS tenders? We can also follow up on what is the magnitude of traditional offshore oil and gas installations?
Without mentioning percentages , just comment on the CCS. I think one important fact is that we are now into what we can call version two, generation two of our project execution within the CCS space, with Klemetsrud for Celsio in Oslo after Brevik, and then also the Northern Lights Phase 2 together with Equinor and partners. That is really perhaps the main takeaway that we are developing and delivering there. The CCS market is super interesting and growing. With this credibility, we are relevant for not only studies, but also having studies being sort of pulled through into feeds and potential execution. It's picking up and increasing. We have a good starting point with the projects that we have executed. On the oil and gas side, again, not mentioning percentages , we have a lot of projects linked to decarbonization, particularly on the Norwegian continental shelf with electrification.
We have a lot of the larger frame agreements with our key clients that are up for renewal, which we are working with. Some of the oil and gas projects are quite sizable. With or without them, they will obviously sort of dominate the percentage . We do have then greenfield opportunities as well that we are going for.
Maybe moving on to a question from Njål Kleiven in ABG. The $94 million loss provisions that were reported in the first half, is everything related to the legacy projects? What is the relative split between the first quarter and the second quarter?
As we have presented in our report, the legacy lump sum projects are all coming to a sail away now in the second half of this year. The changes that you see here are changes in estimates that we have done now at the closing of the second quarter, so first half.
Maybe a follow-up on lump sum. Indicate the share of lifecycle contracts in the tender pipeline, if you can go to that one, Idar. Lifecycle, what is the share of lifecycle contracts, the frame agreements in the tender pipeline?
Yeah, that is quite a significant share of what is under the tender pipeline. We expect this to be concluded towards the end of the year.
Yeah, a follow-up question is on how do you think of the backlog margins for renewable projects versus oil and gas awards?
Margins in that space have been for the legacy projects one thing with the lump sum approach. I think what we see now with our clients that we are working with in the renewables vertical is a different kind of dialogue. Focus on maturing projects together, understanding the risk. When you are approaching actual execution, make sure that we are sharing the risk and have the right kind of terms and conditions around that so that the right sort of player in the setup handles the risk that they can deliver on. I think that's a lot more mature and open dialogue around that. It's really healthy in all the settings we are. As we always say, we have a lot of opportunities that we are discussing. Because of that, we can be selective in which client we go with and which projects we then commit to.
Just to follow up on that one, I think it's important to understand that our sort of legacy lump sum project was awarded and taken on board in the middle of the COVID period, and then topped up with the Ukraine war. That has created quite some significant challenges. Also, the pricing format on what we have taken on board after that is completely different. Our requirement for margins for both oil and gas and renewables and other low-carbon solutions, they are competing for the same sort of resources that we have. The margin requirement on both oil and gas and renewables is basically the same. We are not taking on a renewables project just because it's renewable. They need to compete and have the same healthy margins as oil and gas projects.
Thank you, Idar. Maybe moving on to another question from Njål Kleiven. Did the milestones, meeting the milestones from Hugin A and Castberg, affect the Q2 numbers in a meaningful way?
I mentioned earlier on that we do have incentive mechanisms also linked to completing this and delivering on milestones. I would say, Idar, that we didn't have any big surprises there. We delivered and got the right kind of compensation for that.
Yeah. Moving on to a question from Mick Pickup in Barclays. On the legacy projects, are there any challenges left? If you can give an update.
We have projects that we are very close to delivering. When you're on the project, you know when you are getting close to that delivery milestone, you are in a countdown mode. There are no big challenges there. Our focus is to make sure that these products and topsides are coming from our yards in a fully completed version so that we can control the offshore phase in a good way. In parallel with that, you always have a commercial closeout that we are doing. We have open dialogues and constructive discussions with all the clients there.
Another question from Mick Pickup on the volatility in oil prices. Have you seen any changes in your clients' attitudes?
I think if you take it holistically, what we see with the fluctuation and also the opportunities we have together, particularly on the NCS, we have a Norwegian industry with clients with the likes of us and also our partners and subcontractors that are focused now on improving this further. We are really collaborating on how that improvement approach and agenda shall be done together to lift the different opportunities on NCS. I think that is over and above the fluctuation in oil prices. No big changes, but improvement pressure and ambition together.
I think that was a good conclusion. That was the end of the questions that have been posted. From all of us here, I would like to thank you for listening and wishing you all a good summer.
Thank you.
Thank you and goodbye.