Earnings Call: Q4 2020

Feb 4, 2021

Good morning and welcome to this presentation of PGS 4th Quarter 2020 Results and our 2021 Market Perspectives. My name is Barn Stenberg, Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications in PGS. This presentation was originally planned to be a webcast, but has been transformed into an audio cast unfortunately. With us from management today are President and CEO, Rune Olar Pedersen and CFO, Gottfred Langset. Before we start, I would like to give some practical information. Participants on this audio cast can submit their questions via the on the Orocast platform and we will respond to them after management's concluding remarks. I would also like to draw your attention to the cautionary statement and the risk factors disclosed in our 2019 annual report and the Q4 2020 earnings release. Agenda for this presentation is that Gottfred will start by presenting Q4 and preliminary full year 2020 results. Biruni will continue with our review of 2020 and give you our perspectives for 2021. Then Godtfred will round off by giving our 2021 financials. So with that, it's my pleasure to give the word to Godfred. Thank you, Borr. I will on the following slides focus on And Q4, the seismic market remained challenging in the Q4. There was a limited new program activity globally, which led to weak vessel utilization. Client spend was muted due to the significant reduction of 2020 budgets implemented by clients early in the year. Despite this, we achieved a 70% sequential revenue increase from a very low third quarter. The increase is driven by MultiClient Revenues. We saw a usual year end increase, Perce again from very low levels in earlier quarters. We also benefited in the 4th quarter from sales related to license round activity in West Africa and Brazil. On cost, we had low cash cost in the Q4, we revert to that 80 €500,000 of quarterly cash cost. We saw an order book increase in the Q4, which points towards improved vessel utilization into 2021. Lastly, on this slide, our agreements with lenders are now moving towards completion, Following the court sanctioning of our scheme of arrangement 2 days ago on January 2nd February 2nd. A high level look at the financial summary shows a sequential improvement of segment revenues, EBITDA and EBIT. At the bottom right, the cash flow from operations does not show the same improvement. However, This is primarily due to our revenue profile collection period and intra quarter distribution. The cash Flow in Q4 is primarily driven by the revenues we generated in the Q3, which as you can see from the illustrations were quite low. On key financial Numbers or figures, the Q4 segment revenues and other income was $172,800,000 a 40% decrease from Q4 'nineteen. 172,800,000 of revenues is 15,000,000 approximately higher than the segment revenues we had in our pre announcement in January. Yeah. The reason for this is that we've recorded $15,500,000 of estimated government grants as Other income in Q4. Segment EBITDA was $129,600,000 a 33% reduction from Q4 'nineteen. We had a positive segment EBIT of SEK 20,500,000. And lastly, Revenues on an as reported basis, which I hope you know is dependent on exactly when the surveys are completed and delivered under IFRS was higher than the segment revenues in the Q4, but they were lower for the full year. Moving on to some specific matters impacting the Q4 financials, we recorded €30,000,000 impairment on seismic vessels in the quarter. This additional impairment was driven by an increase of the estimated weighted average cost of capital or WACC used for impairment calculations and it was increased to 12% from previously approximately 11%, Which has an impact on the valuation of long lived assets. We also recorded SEK 18,200,000 of MultiClient Departments in the quarter. I mentioned already the government grants by Q3, we had recognized NOK 23,200,000 As other income in Q4, we have recorded additional SEK 15,500,000. With respect to our debt rescheduling, which I will revert to in much more detail later, A couple of points impacting the Q4 year end financials. All the debt involved is classified as short term at December 31. The debt will be reclassified to long term in Q1 when the transaction is completed. Also, we have charged to expense 4,200,000 of previously deferred debt issuance cost. I go to then go to Q4 operational highlights, we had contract revenues of NOK 20,800,000 in the 4th quarter, 8% of our total vessel time was used for contract acquisition. And this related to a 4 gs survey in West Africa. The segment multi client revenues amounted to 131 point 1,000,000. We had a prefunding of 185 percent, impacted by sales of surveys acquired earlier in the year, but still in the processing phase. Late sales for the quarter was 70,100,000. On vessel utilization, we had low utilization in the quarter, 49% of we had 49% active vessel time in the quarter based on statistics of 5 vessels. The utilization will improve significantly in Q1 2021. Moving to the balance sheet, a liquidity reserve of 156,700,000 At year end, book value of the MultiClient library of SEK 616,100,000 based on IFRS or as reported and 546,400,000 according to our segment reporting. Note that the book value under IFRS, which is Steitel Hijer than the segment book value should be seen in the context of deferred or not recognized revenues of SEK188 1,000,000 at the end of the year, which will be Recorded as revenues when the processing is completed and data delivered to the prefunderer. Then cash flow, we have a lower cash flow from operation both in Q4 compared to last Sohir, and for the full year, this is this reduction is driven by significantly lower revenues primarily. The working capital at year end is impacted by approximately €30,000,000 of Q2, Q3 sales with payment agreed early 2021 as earlier disclosed, this will obviously then benefit the Q1. Lastly on this slide, I wanted to mention that other Cash flow relating to other investing activities includes a legal deposit of €17,700,000 relating to a and I will pause here and give the word to Rune Olad. Thank you, Gottfred, and good morning to everyone. My talk this morning will revolve around the following themes. I will speak a little bit about 2020, a summary or recap of what we have been through this year. And I will give some comments to the market outlook for 2021 and onwards. And also, we will talk a little bit about EGS' strategic direction and how it fits in with the energy transition we are currently experiencing. And lastly, I will come back to guidance. But let's start with a 2020 review. As you know, 2020 developed very differently than expected. It became a very challenging year for PGS. We went into the year optimistic and had just refinance in the beginning of the year. Then COVID-nineteen Kym and we have experienced a 30% revenue reduction caused by the COVID-nineteen pandemic and our clients reaction to it. We had to respond swiftly to this challenge and we did and we have through the year substantially reduced our cost. We have reduced our CapEx by 50% Both versus what we expected to spend this year or last year, sorry. And we have, as Gottfred touched upon, Refinanced and extended maturities on most of our debt. Well, In spite of the COVID-nineteen pandemic, we have been able to Maintain strong vessel and imaging project execution and I am both impressed and proud to say that our Operations department have been able to keep our vessels going, complete crew changes in spite of tremendous challenges in this year. Further, we have, in spite of the challenges we have experienced, also continued the digital transformation Agenda and we have delivered several milestones during the year. And as I will come back to and show you we have also been able to capitalize on our integrated offering being the only company with Wessel and a large multi client business and an imaging business. So being integrated and operating through the value chain in seismic. Well, then to 2021. So So how do we view 2021 and onwards? Well, it is clear that we have started an energy transition in the world. It is accelerated through 2020. But it is also clear that the world will need oil and gas for decades still and therefore also need seismic for decades still. And the best indications of where seismic spending moves from a low level is to look at the oil price. And the current oil price and outlook supports a market recovery. We have a cash we have an oil price sitting well above $50 currently. And as you can see from the lower graph, The breakeven oil price after capex and dividend for our clients is sitting around $50,000,000 Now we have seen several investment houses and analysts and our oil companies Showing that the increase or the overall E and P spending is expected to increase very limited and maybe even when you look at the Overall offshore E and P spending dropped somewhat in 2020 versus 2020 sorry, in 2021 versus 2020. And I would like to remind you all that seismic typically is an early cycle mover. And 2018 can here serve as an example, A year where offshore E and P spending dropped 70% and seismic spending increased 5% as we showed in the Capital Markets Day for 2018. So we expect with this oil price and as I will show you on the next slides and What we are seeing happening in the seismic industry to see a gradual recovery into 2021 from 2020. And are we seeing it in our business? Yes, we are. We are are seeing bids and leads withdrawn from the market in 2020, reemerging for execution in 2021. And the slides you see here, which is the bids and leads curve, given an indication of the bids we have in house now and the Leads that we are recording currently. If you look at that in combination with the fact that the industry Order books are increasing. This is a positive sign. We also see a trend of increasing 4 d activity, which is a typical Early cycle sign, we also saw that into 2017 from 2016 and into 2018. So what we are currently seeing in the seismic business is early indications of moving upwards. For PGS, we will have a majority of our vessel capacity allocated to contract acquisition in 2021. And as I alluded to, the order book is up quite a bit from Q3 to Q4. And we as of year end, we had an order book of US202 $1,000,000 89,000,000 of those related to MultiClient. And we have added further backlog to the order book after quarter end. And based on this, as of end of January, the vessel booking sits as follows. We are fully booked on our 5 vessels in the Q1. We have booked 13 vessel months in the 2nd quarter and we have already booked 10 vessel months in the Q3 of 2021, which obviously is a A significant improvement to the vessel booking we saw at the end of Q3. Now we get a lot of questions on regarding the energy transition. Is it possible to make money in seismic if The demand never comes back to the earlier highs we have seen because of the energy transition. And the answer to that, in our view is yes. We believe that 2020 was a likely low point for the marine seismic industry. You see the supply side in the seismic industry has dropped continuously more or less from 2013 to 2020. We believe, as I said, 2020, late 2020, early 2021 represents a low point And that seismic supply will start to increase slowly again from the summer season of 2021. In 2013, there were 60 seismic vessels operating worldwide. Today, Well, we could probably say there is approximately 15, operating, worldwide. In the same period, our PGS' operating costs are significantly down. So We acknowledge and realize and hope that there is an energy transition. We expect it to Part of the energy mix for decades to come, and there will be a need for seismic. And It is important to realize we do not need a return to the 2013 demand levels for PGS to generate Healthy future cash flow. In fact, the seismic industry will not be able to cope with a return to 20 13 levels. So with the reduction in seismic supply, The adjustment of the PGS organization, we are positioned to deliver healthy future cash flow Even if the seismic world and the seismic demand and the demand for seismic never returns to its earlier high. And a few more words on the energy transition. So what does it do to seismic demand except for reducing it? I think it's clear that the energy transition drives the oil companies, our clients focus from Frontier Exploration to the field and more mature hydrocarbon basins. As you can see from the drawing we have made here with the arrow indicating typical segments in the seismic Industry, if you could call it that, or at least different types of work, starting on the left with Frontier Exploration, which is typically 2 d For, you know, sparse 3 ds over large areas, this is almost exclusively done as MultiClient. And It is not important to own vessel or technology in this market. Then if you move one step To the right you get to what we have called targeted exploration. These are large high density 3 d multiclient surveys in proven hydrocarbon basins for exploration purposes. Now the importance of technology is increasing and owning your own vessels can be a benefit or not depending on the market conditions you are in. If you move one step further, you get to near field exploration or in license exploration. And this is where the marine contract Business model typically starts to play. Here, as I will show you, you could play both Contract, it's in the license, it's near the field. Or you could do MultiClient as we do, typically with strong prefunding. And obviously then, the importance of technology and owning a vessel is increasing, because You cannot do contract work if you are not owning your vessel. It just doesn't simply doesn't work that way. And then when you move to the 4 d, which is the last dot there, Which is production optimization, production seismic, seismic over a producing field, repeated seismic over a producing field. You have to have a vessel. It's always contract and technology is of high importance. We believe, as I said, that the demand for seismic will more and more switch towards, Let's say the right end of this scale away from Frontier Exploration, which we believe will not grow going forward and all the way to the 4 d market, which we actually expect to grow going forward. And access to high capacity vessels and differentiating Technology will be important as we see this energy transition You could almost say that the development we expect because of the energy transition and will play into the strength of the PGS strategy. We are a leader in production 4 d seismic with our high capacity vessels, with multi client, no sorry, multi sensor streamers on all our vessels. We are deploying a joint contract and multi client approach, allowing us to play on every specter. And I will show some examples of how we have utilized Steistat last year. We will, in our MultiClient strategy, grow our MultiClient library, improve in hydrocarbon Besens and we will do it, continue to do it with high prefunding. We do believe that optimizing operating cost and Increasing efficiency will be important as energy transition continues. The number of companies applying 4 d to 1 or more fields have increased fivefold in the last ten-twelve years. We have been a leader in 4 d for this entire period. We did acquire the world's largest 4 d Baseline survey in 2019. And I think it's fair to say that all new major discoveries generally consider 4 d Production optimizations early in the development cycle now. We expect this market to grow going forward. Now if you look at the bottom left graph, you see the number of 4Ds and you see in dark The number of 4 ds is being done by Multi Sensors and then Multi Sensors streamers like GeoStreamer and you see the number of 4 ds being done with conventional streamers in light blue. As you can see, multi sensor technology dominates and takes a larger share of the 4 d streamer market all the time. The GeoStreamer technology was the 1st multi Sensor Streamer Technology and is regarded as a benchmark for 4 d Acquisition Systems. And it is important to note that if a 4 d has been shot with a multi sensor baseline or even just once, it will for the remaining Life of that field remain a multi sensor 4 d acquisition or campaign. We have not seen examples of people going back to conventional streamers after first having done a MultiSensor streamer. And as most of you will know, we have Multi sensors technology on all our vessels and we have a very large market share of multi sensor technology in the world. So we believe we will retain a large market share in this growing part of the market. Now over to why it is important to deploy a joint contract and multi client Proch and I will give 2 examples. The first example is from Egypt. Now Egypt This summer awarded 7 large blocks primarily to supermajors. All these blocks or licenses need seismic on them. So we are facing what we will call in license Exploration. PGS have won all of this work. We have done Several of these blocks under a MultiClient model where we use the light I utilize the PGS MultiClient Permit in the area and we've done one of these surveys as a contract program. As I said, this acquisition primarily cover held acreage awarded in recent Licensing rounds. And then you could ask, well, why are they then MultiClient? Well, because we have a MultiClient permit, we were able to start Acquisition immediately after block ratification. This was important for several of these Supermajors to get going as soon as possible and then avoid a lengthy tendering process. And therefore, We were able to use that and get in and find a commercial model that worked for them and worked for us. Now the late sales potential here obviously come from Farmins Etc. These are very large blocks and there are few members in each of them. The contract survey we are currently doing, they were not so keen to starting early and they were more picky on the technology that they are deploying and therefore we wanted more on that basis. So we won 15 vessel months for Titan class acquisition in the latter part of 2020, and we will be in Egypt well into A second example is Angola. We have been and we still are the key seismic player in Angola. We're a trusted industry partner. We've been there for years. We've invested Been there for years and we operate in Angola all the way from supporting licensing rounds, doing proper multi client With low prefunding just in front of a licensing round and then supporting the round with seismic, We are currently generating revenue from the Namibe licensing round that happened last year and we expect to generate more revenue from that multi client campaign In a very mature basin, we have done near field exploration and in license exploration similar to the Egypt Tug Sampel as we are currently shooting a large block in the MultiClient under the MultiClient business model once again for early access. And we've done several 4Ds in Angola. So a good example of where the integrated model plays to our advantage. Now on to the MultiClient, which is kind of the next topic. So how will The energy transition impact our MultiClient strategy. As you can see here, we have a MultiClient library in all Proven hydrocarbon basins in the world more or less and less so in frontier areas. And it is clear, as I said, going forward, we will only to a very limited degree invest in Frontier Area. Our main focus will going forward be mature and proven hydrocarbon basins for investing in the MultiClient library. And the areas where there are activity is what determines where to invest and where we should expect revenues. And what you see on this slide are some of the activities we expect for 2021, Which are of importance to PGS, either because we may consider to invest there or because we already have invested there and have a library I will comment on a few of them, starting maybe in the West, in the U. S. GOM. Well, there is considerable uncertainty, at least I find it considerable uncertain what will now happen in the USGOM As President Biden has frozen activity, so to speak, for 60 days in the U. S. Gulf of Mexico. And the last thing I heard was that there is the March licensing round is expected to be delayed at least. We don't have large exposure to the U. S. Government, which I will come back to. Of greater interest to us is what is happening in Canada, and where there will be a call for bids in Labrador South. And we expect to be back this summer for further acquisition in Canada and these jobs are always highly pre funded. Further south, we can move to Brazil, A very exciting area for us. The 17th round was moved from 2020 to October 2021 And we have during 2020 and we are currently acquiring most of the blocks in the Campus Basin, which will be Part of the 17th licensing round in Brazil. We are currently on-site acquiring that. So The outcome of that round will be exciting for PGS. And then over to Norway, obviously, we have the APA round just announced, which was active. And then we have the 25th licensing round coming up mainly for blocks in the Barents Sea. And it's going to be interesting to see the tax changes which supports an investment and activity how that plays out for the seismic industry. Egypt, I have talked about. We expect that to remain active during this year. Angola, The Namib licensing round carried out last year is still in the process of being finalized and we expect to see revenues from that going forward. Which has announced the licensing run-in Sabah and one in Sarawak. And as you know, we have a fairly large multi client Library in the Sabah Basin. So quite a lot of activity around the world, which will be important for our multi client investments and also for the investments we have made earlier and potential late sales. Now, where did we do surveys in 2020? As you can see, we did surveys in Canada, Brazil, Norway, Egypt, Angola mainly proven and rather mature hydrocarbon basins in line with our strategy. And I will skip to more on what did our MultiClient business generate our revenues and what do we look like compared to our competitors. As you can see from the net book value and Q3 and the segment revenues in 2020, we have a fairly large share of the total MultiClient libraries, a little bit more than 25%, to put it that way. And when you look at the revenues, it is important to note that revenues in MultiClient and then particularly late sale revenues Will fluctuate from quarter to quarter and from year to year, as we have always said. And last year, we had a relatively Weak year when you compare to our competitors, while we were relatively much Stronger in 2,008. And when you look at what we have been doing in 2020, we are once again relatively and we are compared to our peers performing quite strongly. And we are the largest multi client player in Q2, Q3 and Q4 of 2020. So we are quite satisfied with the investments we have done in earlier years and how we have played the multi client market this year. You see the revenue over investment ratio, Dropping 2020 was a very challenging year, but we are satisfied that we were able to maintain Pre funding level very close to 100 percent also in a very challenging year as 2020 was. In 2020 and Europe and Africa, the main contributors to late sales revenue in 2020. And when you look at this, you see that The various regions where we have library continue or contributes in various degree in various quarter and this will fluctuate also going forward. Speaking to the importance of a geographically diversified library like we have in PGS. The Gulf of Mexico, as I mentioned, after President Biden came to office, He has put a freeze on activity, if I can put it that way, for exploration activity for the U. S. Gulf of Mexico. So we thought it was important to inform you that we obviously have very limited revenues from the US Gulf of Mexico, which accounts for 1% to 3% of our annual MultiClient revenues from 2016 to 2020. And we have not acquired seismic data in the Gulf of Mexico since 2014. And that is obviously out of our books by now. And we do have a segment MultiClient book value related to the U. S. Gulf of Mexico of SEK 19,200,000 as of year end. And this is a reprocessing exercise we did on our Flexvision data set. So it's never good to see freeze on activity, which is important to Seismic, but it will have limited or no impact to PGS. Once again, we show this as we normally do every year. What you see, we have solid multi client diversity and client mix. Larger and smaller oil companies of the world are obviously our clients. Then moving away from our MultiClient business and on to digitalization. As I said earlier, we continued to focus on digitalization and digital transformation I would say of PGS through this difficult year. We've had substantial progress on cloud based multi client sales platform. We have Now uploaded most of our post stack multi client data to the cloud. And we have, As you know, announced a strategic partnership with TGS and CDG for a shared multi client marketplace. It's going to be interesting to see how the 3 of us can utilize the MultiClient asset once it is available on the web and in the cloud. We have had tangible results in optimizing vessel operations. We're seeing effect on energy translation and we are increasing our vessel speeds because we have been able To take the data which we generate on our vessels, on our streamers and put it into context and push it out to the vessels again so that they can use these software tools based on machine learning algorithms and all the data we collect to optimize efficiency and Speed. And we've also entered into predictive maintenance primarily on our streamers. And the picture you see on the Bottom left is from that program where we try to predict which streamer sections are about to fail so that we can switch them out while we are deploying before they fail when they are in the water. And we're also looking into how we can improve HSEQ Through this, so here we have done a lot in 2020 but there is a lot more to do and I'm looking forward to taking out further benefits of digitalization in this area. Another area where we have progressed significantly is imaging or Processing in the cloud. We have typically processed all the multi client data we acquire and data for external clients using supercomputers we have purchased. That is about to end. We are moving the processing from Our own computers and on to the cloud, giving us flexible and scalable compute capacity at obviously much lower and obviously much lower capex exposure as we do not have to buy these supercomputers. We will simply use the cloud when we need it and we will use how much We need at any time. We have also deployed machine learning and artificial intelligence in the processing sequence and accelerating therefore for the time from data acquisition to delivery to the clients. So here we have done a lot during the year and you should expect us to do quite a bit more over the next years. Now on to guidance. We expect group cash cost to be below $400,000,000 in 2021, they are with 5 vessels active throughout the year. We expect MultiClient cash investments to be approximately US150 $1,000,000 And we expect to use approximately 45% of the active three d vessel time in MultiClient acquisition. CapEx, we expect to be approximately SEK 40,000,000 in 2021. So in summary, we have proactively addressed a very challenging 2020 seismic market. We believe that 2021 is likely to show a gradual or slow recovery versus 2020. We base that on higher oil price, giving positive cash flow amongst our clients and that deferred activity from 2020 is coming back In 2021, and we have seen obviously booking and backlog increase quite a bit in the earlier part of 2021. So we are positioned for earnings improvement with low cost and lowest Industry supply for decades. As I've spoken to, the integrated service offering position PGS for the energy transition. We believe the energy transition plays to that strategic model and we have used 2020 to kick start or kick off the digital transformation to accelerate strategy execution such as more efficient and and with that, I give the word back to Gottfred to take you through more of the financials. Thank you, Rune. Starting first with Our financial strategy is to deliver profitability before growth. Our primary focus will be on cash flow and Profitability and we will be moderate on CapEx as we go forward. We aim to deliver a return on Capital employed higher than our cost of capital over the cycle. And a key priority is To reduce debt and get to a capital structure that will sustain future downturns, we will therefore apply our cash Generation, primarily to reduce debt with a target of the net debt level to be below €500,000,000 to €600,000,000 So our financial strategy remains unchanged from what we talked about earlier, but The developments that we have experienced in 2020 have extended our expected timeline to deliver on this strategy, including the targeted capital structure. Moving to our rescheduling of debt maturities. In the Q4, we agreed amendments to our loan agreements With all parties to the export credit facilities and all except one lender to the RCF and TLB Pilates. Therefore, we had to move through a scheme of arrangement in UK to make these amendments effective for everyone. The scheme was sanctioned by the court 2 days ago, and we are now proceeding to close the transaction, which is expected to happen during February. The agreements in short defer all scheduled debt maturities and amortizations to September 2022 beyond. The fees that the agreements provides for the lenders It's SEK 8,000,000 of cash fees to the lenders and SEK 8,400,000 of so called PIK or payment in kind fees to those lenders and payment in practice means that the fees amount is added to the loan balance and repaid together with the loan. Lastly, on this slide, we will issue NOK 116.2 million NOK Convertible Bond, NOK 67,000,000 of that will be Settled for or has been subscribed for by exchange of a corresponding RCF TLB amount, so that those loans will reduce correspondingly. And the remaining NOK 49,000,000 will be issued against cash Payment to PGS. More details on the main terms on the next slide, I would seek to be Relatively quick on this, the 35,000,000, 350,000,000 RCF that we have had For some time will be converted into a TLB. So the facilities will now be combined into a Term loan maturing in 2024 at a total amount of $873,000,000 which takes into account The peak fees and the addition of the peak fees and deduction of amounts exchanged into the convertible bond. And this TLB will have an amortization profile as shown on this list with the first amortization, SEK135,000,000 starting Through to second half of twenty twenty two is deferred, total of approximately 106,000,000 and that will then be repaid over 1 year approximately starting December 2022. There will be an excess cash or excess liquidity sweep, which applies to liquidity above NOK 200,000,000 Until the first installment on the TLB and the deferred ECF amounts have been repaid. Beyond that date, there will be a Similar sweep for liquidity reserve over SEK 175,000,000 at each quarter end. The financial maintenance covenants have been amended, particularly the leverage ratio It's increased to start at 4.5x and then gradually reduce to get back to 2.75 times by 2023. Yes, I move on to the next slide. And very short slide shows the changes to the amortization profile. And as you can see, We're eliminating all maturities through the first half twenty twenty two, and those are then recaptured shared over the period from September 22 to March 2024. I included a slide on capital leases. Some short comments as of now or start 2021, the recorded Lease liability is SEK 159,000,000. The amortization or repayment For 2021, it will be approximately SEK40 1,000,000, which is less than what we had for 2020. Most of the lease liabilities Related to vessels approximately 70% and most of the liability again is dominated in US dollars. We then move to cost and the quarterly cash cost illustration, SEK 80,000,000 of cash cost in the 4th Quarter, you'll see that there is a strong reduction over the 3 last quarters of 2020. So The Q4 captured all of the effects from our cost savings and also It was impacted by low vessel utilization or survey activity level. Therefore, also The SEK 80,000,000 we had in Q4 is below our run rate cost with normal utilization, and we will have a On the annual numbers, the 2020 gross cash cost ended at 4.26 and as we have pointed to earlier. This is a reduction from the initial plan and what we said on last year's Capital Markets Day, euros 600,000,000 so close to 100 and 75,000,000 reduction for this year. The run rate reduction is more than 200,000,000 as we expect 2021 Cash cost to be below €400,000,000 with 5 vessels. The cost estimate here is based on the market Pricing and exchange rates and similar applying at the start of this year and of some importance, the Chrome dollar exchange rate, we have applied this 8.55 and the oil price Used for fuel cost estimation is approximately $55 Brent. We move then to CapEx, dollars 36,000,000 of CapEx for the full year 2020. We expect or plan for a slight increase in the generation GeoStreamer. We expect the gross depreciation to be approximately SEK 150,000,000. A portion of that will be capitalized as we use vessels and imaging equipment for And MultiClient projects, approximately SEK 50,000,000 expected to be capitalized. Then on the MultiClient Financials, we have a solid track record of delivering prefunding in or above our targeted range, as you will see from the illustration To the top left, for 2020, we had the prefunding of 98% on 222,000,000 of investments. We plan to invest less in the coming year as Rune has pointed to approximately $150,000,000 and using approximately 45% of our vessel capacity. I move to tax. This graph shows our cash tax payments over recent years. We operate our largest vessels in the Norwegian tonnage tax regime. Our current tax or cash tax typically is determined by withholding taxes in Countries where we acquire surveys or where we are a seed tax resident and have no carry forward tax Kloss is typically varied between €10,000,000 €35,000,000 per year. I move to foreign currency and sensitivity. This is probably non territory, but Fairly significant portion of our cash cost and CapEx is in non U. S. Currencies. Obviously, majority is in U. S. Dollars, but there is a significant portion of Norwegian krona and British pounds, Most importantly, we, therefore, in a way, strong U. S. Dollars, as has been the case Throughout 2020 mostly benefits our reported costs and vice versa. A 10% change between A 10% change of this dollar krona exchange rate has a 10,000,000 to 12,000,000 Full year effect on our EBIT and similar 10% change for British pounds against the dollar has approximately half of that effect. We do not hedge leasing commitments in Norwegian corona since we see that as close to being natural hedges. Then I am at my last Slide and to sum up, we have achieved an extension of debt maturities and amortization to September 2022 and beyond, and we're very satisfied with that. We do focus on cash flow to reduce debt and to manage the new maturity profile that we have established with the ongoing amendment. We have reduced our cash cost run rate with more than $200,000,000 or more than 33 percent. CapEx has been reduced by 50%. We will continue to exercise cost and CapEx discipline as we move forward. We have some questions already from the audience. So we have the first question from Jeroen Lunde in Danske Bank. You seem to plan for a higher contract allocation in 2021. Can you just explain Why you do this and also link this to the prefunding levels you are currently facing? Yes, I can comment on that. The reason for that is quite simply what we have Currently booked and what is sitting in our backlog versus the MultiClient programs we are currently planning. So it's it is, of course, driven by the market demand that we see for our services currently. And in that, there is of course an estimation of what we will do in The parts of the year, the Q4 and parts of the Q3, which we have not booked, which may of course change, but this is the way we see it right now. There is no, let's say, link to do pre funding here. Let me put it that way. It's linked to, As I said, the demand for contract services and when we believe we will do and how we will allocate our resources in MultiClient. Then we have another question from Aris Konvik. Do you plan to take out other vessels from Leyap? Well, we are currently planning on operating 5 vessels through 2021. But it is also clear that we have experienced significant booking. We're fully booked for the Q1. We have strong booking both in the 2nd and third quarter. So I will not rule out the possibility of introducing a 6th vessel to the summer season, but that is a decision we will take if and when demand is there for such a vessel. Yes. Now we have some questions from John Olaisen in ABG Sundal Collier. Polarcus has initiated a sales process of its vessels. It will be interesting to hear some comments from you on this situation. And then he also asks, are you interested in acquiring the Polarcus vessels? First of all, I just say we have quite a few vessels in PGS, as I indicated also in the last Question in EAP. I don't think I will comment too much upon the product situation. It is quite sensitive and a challenging situation for Polarcus as a company. Yes, let me further some questions related to Polarcus. Have you been have you seen any effects of the Polarcus situation, For example, oil companies contacting you to take over some of the jobs that Polarcus was supposed to undertake in 2021. And do you think the Polarcus vessels will be out of the market? Potentially, there will be only 2 significant vessel Owners left in the market PGS and Sharewater. How will this lead to improved industry discipline, higher utilization and better pricing? Well, a lot in one. I can say that it is clear, Polarcus has as was announced broken off From the operations they had and as far as we understand informed clients that they will not be performing The work they had in their backlog and yes, we have been contacted by clients in this respect, I think is that is what I can say. Basically after the announcement, this came as a shock to us as it did to everyone else. With respect to the market development, I think you summed it up in your question. There is a chance that there will be only 2 players in the market. We have both of us significant vessels. It will be how whether this will be More discipline or what they will do to supply side is both a function of the vessels and a function of what is available of streamers obviously both within BGS in Shearwater and on the Polarcus vessels. I don't know how long the Polarcus vessels will stay out of the market. But And when Dolphin were put in a similar situation, those vessels were out for approximately a year. So at least It is, I guess it's reasonable to expect that in the short term, these vessels will not be part of the seismic market. Jurgen Landa. He says 45% of active fleet allocation to multi client is a move towards less multi client and more contract. Is this a deliberate strategic shift or just a minor effect of the short term opportunities? And then he also wonders whether it will be possible to give some indications of expected 2021 prefunding levels. Yes, on the prefunding levels, And we will not say anything more than that. We expect to stay within 80% to 20% sorry, 80% to 120% Range also in 2021 and also linked to my comments that we will focus on high prefunding also going forward, I guess, could support that statement. With respect to the 45%, I think it is You should assume that if the market remains as it is, we will be around fifty-fifty. And it will be More opportunity, call it, opportunistic swings between around the fifty-fifty mark, depending on market demand and Where we have vessel, how that fits with where the demand is and whether we do some of these Surveys as MultiClient or contract in these near field exploration in license and exploration may also affect this. So it's I don't think it's a deliberate move towards more contract going to 45. We had more than we expected of MultiClient last year and now we're gravitating more to back to the fifty-fifty mark, which we have Binat. Next question is from Christopher Mullenkin in Carnegie. You talked about the demand for 4 d surveys, but 4 d surveys tend to be relatively smaller in size. Wouldn't your large Ramform vessels be Competitively disadvantaged versus smaller seismic vessels. No. And I think the history shows that that's not the case. Yes, some of the 4Ds and maybe as I referring to the 4Ds in The North Sea are of smaller size. But obviously, the 4Ds that we see moving forward are also of Very large sizes and I refer to the largest four d we have done in 2019. It was Several months of Ramform Titan acquisition. So this varies. But I think it is To his point, it is important and we have stated it is important before to have a diversified fleet. And we would hope to be able to introduce over time More of our vessels so that we have some vessels that are smaller and some vessels that are larger, which brings a better balance because Different surveys require different configuration and sizes of vessels. Next question is from Stig Erik Schirchkeide in Kepler Cheuvreux. You have 100% coverage for Q1 and 77% coverage combined for Q2 and Q3 Very careful commenting on prices and what we see on pricing. I think I will limit myself to seeing that the prices we have seen hasn't dropped this time as far as it dropped in 2015 and 'sixteen when there was An abundance of seismic vessels in the market and the demand dropped. It was more dramatic then in terms of pricing and what we see now and other than that I will be careful in our very consolidated industry to comment on pricing. The Nier further asks, can you update on timing to reactivate and the related CapEx for the 3 vessels taken out in 2020? Yes, we can we it will only take weeks, maybe to introduce the first, maybe a Hans. So we can delay that decision to fairly close to when we see we have sufficient work for that vessel. Then it takes a little bit more time for the for, let's say, the 6th, 7th vessel and probably even more time for the 8th vessel. And depending on how long it will take before we, let's say, introduce the 8th, we may need a new streamer set for the 8th vessel, If it takes quite a bit of time before that is reintroduced. And then obviously, the lead time is longer for that vessel. But as I said, if we go to the 8th and if that is in a, let's say, in a year or 2 or whenever that may be, we will probably need new streamer sets of what $40,000,000 And CapEx guidance is that it is based on the industry environment as is or does Take into account a gradual improvement in the seismic market during 2021. And the MultiClient Guidance is based on, as I said, how we see the industry right now. And how we, first of all, What we have booked, what we see there and then what we have not booked in the Q4 and in the second and third quarter and what we I think we are then going to do with our vessels. So I'm not sure it Is it correct to say it takes into account a gradual recovery? It more or is a reflection of what we currently see. If we can elaborate a bit on our expectations and plans in terms of cooperation or cooperating with Ocean Floor Geophysics. Yeah, this is a company where we have an ownership share. They I have taken over our EM equipment and our you know everything suitable to do an EM business. So we will of course To the extent possible help them generate revenues from that business, I don't think I will comment too much about what other plans we may or may not have together with them. We think they are an Interesting company with good people and interesting ideas, which we may cooperate with on also one of the things. Not a material part of your MultiClient book. As you say, you seem to have had the foresight to reduce investment in that region. What are your thoughts on other governments that might put more tighter restrictions on new leases and exploration. It's obviously a difficult question to answer and this came as a Price to me, I should say, as well as probably everyone else, although we had noted President Biden's comments in his campaign, obviously, as I'm sure our competitors had as well. What will happen in other regions? We try to follow the political debate in the Most active areas where we operate and we take that into account when we invest. But it is a very, very mixed picture around the world. And I'm not On aggregate, not very concerned that a lot of governments We'll impose this to the extent that it will have a very large impact on the global seismic industry in the near term at least. But it's a difficult question to answer I must say. Another question from Amy Wang. On your joint venture with TGS and CGG, could you talk more about the timeline, client reaction and material investments in the platform? No, I think I will be cautious there. We will of course, The 3 of us, I mean, we are in this together. So I will be cautious commenting in too much on it alone and in respect for the other 2. So we will try to announce make announcement to the market as we progress. I have not heard anything negative from many clients After this, the clients of PGS are generally very excited about what we are doing in the digital space, including And the fact that we're moving our MultiClient library into the cloud and making it available electronically, which obviously allows for a different way of consumption of the MultiClient library, different way of transferring Library, immediate access, etcetera, etcetera. And this is a development very much supported by our client and the cooperation on the market Platform with CGG and TGS is a step in this direction. So far we've only received Positive feedback on the PGA side. Then we have another question from from Malorlaken in Carnegie. What would be a fair assumption for vessel steaming and yard stays and standby for Q1 2021. I don't think we want to be this specific. I think It is on average over the years, we have used 2% to 4% of our time on the yard and A bit over 10% on streaming and I don't think we will go into with specific indications on specific quarters. Next question is from Mick Pickup in Barclays. You talked of next Generation GeoStreamer. What does this bring? Yes, it is First, I would say first and foremost, it brings a much cheaper streamer in production. It will be cheaper to produce the actual streamer and quite significantly cheaper than what it is today. That is the first benefit. And it is more operational solid, so that it will be less subject to wear and tear. And therefore, hopefully, it should also be cheaper to operate. And we would We try to address the operational challenges on it. So it's more on efficiency and cost of production Than it is to, let's say, improve image. There are also, obviously, if you talk to our experts, some improvements to what we can do on on the imaging side and things like that, but for this perspective it's more on cost and efficiency. Thank you, Rune. At this moment, we don't have any further questions. So we can pause for a moment to allow people to type in Jens, if there is any last minute questions from the audience. As there are no further questions, that concludes this presentation. So thank you for participating and goodbye.