Good morning, everyone, welcome to this presentation of Essity's Half Year Report 2023. I'm Johan Karlsson. I'm the Head of Investor Relations here at Essity. With me here today, I have Magnus Groth, President and CEO of Essity, also Fredrik Rystedt, CFO and Executive Vice President here at Essity. We will start today with a presentation of the report, after that, we will go into the Q&A. During the Q&A session, I would like to ask you to limit yourself to one question each. With that, I would like to hand it over to you, Magnus. Magnus, please go ahead.
Thank you, Johan. Good morning, everyone. Just before coming into this Q report, I was reflecting on the last 2 and a half years and all the hard work that our organization has done to come through the pandemic in a very successful way, to manage the raw material tsunami that we had during the last 18 months, of course, also all the supply chain challenges. I feel that our organization is more motivated, more engaged, and more energized than they've ever been before. This is because we're seeing now a very, very positive trend in terms both of sales and results, and we'll talk more about that, of course, during the quarter.
We have the 3 quarters of continuously improving sales and margins. Actually disregarding the energy peak last year, it's 7 quarters now that we've seen this very, very strong growth and profit growth consecutively, and we expect this to continue also in the coming quarters. A very strong momentum in the group. I'm happy with the results that we have this quarter. There are many strengths in here, and we'll talk more about them. Good progression, high level of activity, many good progress in many areas. Here are some highlights. Of course, one highlight is that we exited Russia. We're one of few companies, according to the Kyiv School of Economics, that keeps count of non-Russian companies leaving Russia.
We're one of very, very few companies, actually less than 10% of the companies that had business in Russia at the time of the invasion of Ukraine, that have actually left, and we are one of them, and we will present that achievement soon. The strategic review of our ownership and our future relation to Vinda and our private label division in Europe for consumer tissue are progressing according to plan. We continue, of course, with the underlying, maybe most important of all, development of the business, not least, launching sustainable innovations, and this quarter, we had a very high pace, 10 innovations. We're also doing many other good things in the company, not least, also seeing a higher pace of savings in the quarter.
All of this together leads us to progress to our ROCE target of achieving above 17% return on capital employed by 2025. Another good step in that direction. Looking then at the results, sales growth of 8.7%, most of that coming from price and mix, a very positive mix again, in all 3 business areas, 0.6% overall. Volumes were down 3.6%. This is a combination of lower market volumes, but also decisions that we have taken, especially in Professional Hygiene, but also in some other areas, actually, to step out of underperforming contracts where we don't see the opportunity to get the margins and the rate of return that we are expecting going forward.
We're still very much focused on improving margins at the expense of volume, but of course, keeping that balance by investing in our brands and launching new products and increasing our AMP spend, as we'll see. Acquisitions, the ones included here, Knix, Modibodi, doing really, really well and contributing with 1.3% to growth. If you look at the numbers there to the right, they're quite different compared to a year ago. Adjusted EBITA is up nearly 50% to SEK 4.7 billion. It's one of our best quarters ever, and adjusted EBITA margin compared to a year ago is up 240 basis points.
Adjusted return on capital employed, also big step compared to a year ago towards our long-term goal of 17% by 2025, and we're now at 13.2. When you look at the adjusted EBITA margin, as I mentioned, increased to 10.7%. If you do the exercise and exclude the parts of our business that are under strategic review, the adjusted operating margin would actually be 12.5% as a reference. Most of the difference there actually comes from Vinda, as you will be able to calculate, looking at the Vinda numbers. A very positive development, again, sequentially and year-over-year.
The adjusted EBITA margin bridge, I think it's important to highlight that, the impact on gross profit margin contributing to most of the improvement comes very much from self-help, so higher prices, better mix, and again, and we'll talk more about the significant cost savings, something that has been challenging previously due to supply chain disruptions and COVID shutdowns and so on. I think it's important to note that raw materials and energy are still very negative, even compared to a year ago, 490 basis points negative. All of that is, of course, overcome with the positive things I just mentioned. We also have a negative impact from lower volumes and salary inflations in cost of goods sold.
AMP is contributing to, of course, our development, and we're spending more in AMP, but the contribution to. It's having a negative impact on our EBITA margin, and that's because we see the benefits long term of doing this, while SG&A is contributing positively. Even though we have higher total costs for SG&A, as a percentage of sales, it's coming down, and thus as a positive contribution to margins. Again, here in SG&A, the difference is very much salary and to some extent, also travel. As expected, and as you know, we were flagging to have a somewhat higher salary inflation numbers in this quarter because of the salary adjustments that also go back to the Q1 and cover the Q1.
My favorite slide, one of my favorite slides, as you know, the other one is about our innovations, the quarterly development when it comes to sales and profitability, and I think these numbers talk for themselves, and we expect to see a positive trend also in the next coming quarters. An exception there in Q3 of last year, when it comes to adjusted EBITA, is all relating to the energy shocks that we had there during the beginning of the war in Ukraine. Overall, step by step, moving up. The exit of Russia, something I'm very, very proud of. The organization has done a fantastic job here. We exited on the 17th of July, so very recently, but the work began already a few weeks after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Russia accounted for approximately 2% of group net sales.
The purchase price in the end was SEK 1.2 billion on a cash and debt-free basis. This leads to an earnings impact of around half a billion SEK. Already last year, we did a write-down of SEK 1.7 billion. This will be reported as an item affecting comparability in the Q3 of this year. That's done. We're completely out, a big achievement, especially when you follow in the press what's going on recently with non-Russian companies that are still active in Russia. Efficiency improvements, very important. We have been challenged here. It's been difficult to work with efficiency improvements on the last years during COVID and then supply chain disruptions. It's easier again now.
We see great potential in the areas mentioned here, and in the quarter, we had significant gross savings that actually were even higher than our inflation, so that we showed net savings on from efficiencies of SEK 90 million in the quarter. A big step forward, and we expect to see further savings going forward. Much of this is now coming from savings on raw materials, on material rationalization, but also from all the other areas that you see here. We're working very focused to improve efficiencies and cut costs in all these areas, and it's easier to do now than it was a few quarters ago. Innovations very much focused on sustainability and strong market trends. This is one example, the Tork and Libresse Period Care Dispenser.
There's a strong trend towards having dispensers in workplaces, universities, schools, public buildings, where you can actually then have access to free pads and liners, femcare liners. You can see it on the picture, the dispenser we have here, and we have a strong development in this area in a few markets, among others, Australia and the U.K. Another example of the 10 innovations that we had in the quarter is something we're launching in Latin America, and this is then reusable pads and liners. It's really extending what we've been doing now in washable, absorbent underwear, and also having them washable, absorbent reusable, and washable pads and liners. Something we're excited about and that keeps driving our femcare business in a very, very positive way.
I mentioned that our AMP investments are up, and where we see especially positive developments is in femcare and in TENA retail, so what we call intimate hygiene and fueling innovations like these. Before handing over to Fredrik, there's one thing more I'd like to mention, and this is the restructuring that we're continuing in Professional Hygiene. In the previous quarter, we announced a major restructuring of Professional Hygiene in Europe, and this quarter we are announcing a big restructuring in the U.S., and the aim is to cut out the lowest margin. It's a kind of bigger cure or kill exercise. We're cutting out the lowest margin, most commoditized, oldest assortment, and actually then following with taking out production capacity and cutting costs.
What we announced last quarter for Europe will have a positive impact on margins for Professional Hygiene, of about 1%, and what we're doing now in the U.S. will add another 1% of margin, approximately. 2 examples of initiatives that are really contributing to our journey to 17% return on capital employed in 2025. Let's dig into the numbers. Fredrik, welcome.
Thank you, Magnus. I will be glad to do exactly that. I'll start with Health & Medical, which is approximately 16% of our total net sales in the quarter. As you can see from this slide, we continue to have a really strong organic growth, 8%, as you can see, and this was driven by price mix. If we look at price, approximately 10.5% in the quarter, and we were actually able to achieve sequentially 1.5%. You know that we've talked about that a lot, that Health & Medical is somewhat later in the curve when it comes to price increases, so you can clearly see that we have continued to execute on that agenda also in this Q2.
Mix continued to be positive, so quite a good quarter. Obviously, volumes were down, and this is a consequence of our focus on profitability ahead of volume, and we have left unprofitable contracts primarily in continents. Of course, that has been the main explanation to that. That doesn't mean that it's permanently out of those contracts, but of course, for now, it's more profitable not to do that business. If we look at input costs, and Magnus alluded to it, if we look at comparable to last year in Q2, we have a significant increase still. Actually, when it comes to Health & Medical, different to the other 2, we also have a slight sequential increase.
Of course, despite that, margins have improved, and that is a consequence of the price cost gap performance and of course, also efficiency. If I then go to consumer goods, and this is about 60% of our total net sales, continued strong growth there, 8%, including the acquisitions of Knix and Modibodi that we executed during the H2 of last year. Of course, as before, the price increases were the main drivers, mainly executed in previous quarters. Cause if you look at sequentially, in this area, prices are somewhat down sequentially with a couple of percent, and this is mainly related to Asia and seasonal promotion that is typical for the Q2 relating to shopping festivals in Asia. This is the main contributing factor to the sequential price decline.
As you can see, mix was actually marginally positive, and we are very proud of that, not least given the fact that we see, and of course, this is not a surprise, a continued down trading in many places. Of course, despite that fact and due to the innovations, partly what Magnus talked about before, we've continued to maintain a marginally positive mix. Volumes also in this area are down. You know many of the reasons, so the exits of diapers in Latam, Russia, and then the exit of one of the contracts when it comes to baby retail brand in the European market. We also have some lower volumes in consumer tissue, and this is because we prioritize margin over volume.
What is really, really good to see here, and you can see it here, that incontinence and feminine, so intimate hygiene in general is really, really performing well, both from a volume and price standpoint. Just maybe as a attached to that intimate hygiene, Knix continues to perform super well with more than 20% growth in the quarter, so really, really good. Input cost and SG&A, still much higher than last year, a significant impact, a negative impact on margins compared to Q2. Here we now see a more positive trend. We can see a bit on the input cost, not on SG&A, but on the input cost, sequentially a bit lower. Of course, the improvement that we see in EBITA margin is achieved in the same fashion as before.
Price increase is better mix, and as Magnus talked about, also efficiency. Good performance there. If we talk about then our final area, so this is about 24% of our net sales, we are very happy as with the performance, and it's strong growth, it's strong profitability. We had 11.2% growth, and this is very much impacted by price increases, but of course, also a positive mix. In this case, price increases in the quarter compared to last year, roughly about 14.5%, mix positive with nearly 2%. If we look at sequentially, the price development here, largely flat.
Of course, that, from that, you can deduct that the volumes, as you can see, were negative, and this is partly due to the restructuring measures in Europe that we announced last quarter and that Magnus talked about. All of that sums up to a significant improvement of both the absolute EBITA, but also the EBITA margin. We are, as you can see, above 15%. Also here, better prices and better mix, the primary drivers. As the same as for the others, higher, much higher cost for raw material in the quarter. In this case, we also saw a slight sequential decline. We talked about of course, the...
Magnus, you mentioned that, the restructuring now that we are doing in the United States, involving the closure of 2 plants, one converting, paper-making plant and one converting plant, we will take that restructuring charge in the Q2. Of course, the cash impact there, roughly about SEK 350 million from that restructuring. As is the case with the restructuring we're doing in Europe, over time, we will replace that with higher volumes in system-based products like, for example, Peak Serve. Let me just end, not specifically related to Professional Hygiene, but rather to the group as a whole. As you will remember from last quarter, we do this on a sequential basis.
I'll give you a bit of our outlook in a few areas relating to what has been happening in Q2, so Q3 versus Q2. If I start with the input cost, if I take then the raw material, we expect lower cost for raw materials sequentially, and this is mainly the case for consumer goods. When it comes to energy, and this may come as a bit of surprise, but we expect it slightly, actually, higher. Of course, with the knowledge we have at present relating to the spot prices, time will tell, needless to say. What we can see at this point of time, slightly higher, and this has to do with the prices that we have within our energy hedges.
We're hedged to roughly about 70% on gas and electricity for the Q3, and what we can see then, slightly higher cost. When it comes to the final part of input, so distribution, we expect that to be largely flat. Talking about SG&A, you saw a sequential increase as we flagged in Q2 versus Q1. Looking forward, however, we don't see that increase, so roughly flat cost for SG&A here in Q3 and Q2. When it comes to pricing, we don't comment on specifically pricing because it has to do, of course, with cost development. But as we have talked about it before, the price-cost gap will need to continue to increase, and that is, of course, specifically related to Health & Medical, to a degree, but also to Asia.
On volumes, it is impacted, as you have heard now, it is impacted by our choices that we have done, either in exiting contracts or when it comes to restructuring in Professional Hygiene, as a few examples there. It's always difficult to estimate individual quarters as we have said. We do expect, of course, volume to be a bit lower, but gradually over time, improve as we go forward. Of course, in the longer perspective, reaching our 17% target volume growth is, of course, part of that equation. With those words, Magnus, I'll leave back to you.
Thanks, Fredrik. This is our last slide before opening up for questions. We are committed to achieving 17% return on capital employed by 2025 at the latest, and as you can see here, another big step, we're now at 13.2%, so the gap is narrowing quarter-over-quarter. We have a really energized organization, and everyone's laser-focused on moving towards this long-term target through all the measures that you can see here on this slide. Very high activity level, many things going on. In addition, and on top of this, the strategic initiatives that we announced in the last quarter. Thanks for listening to our presentation. Operator, let's open up for questions.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to ask a question, to redraw your question, please press star 2. The first question comes from Victoria Nice, calling from Société Générale. Please go ahead.
Morning, everyone. My first question's on price levels, which were lower sequentially versus 2019 at group level. I know it's difficult to be too specific, but what can you tell us at this stage to help us think about the evolution of pricing from here? I guess in this context, were there any additional impact on volumes from any potential destocking ahead of any price decreases? If so, is this something that could reverse? If I could just sneak another one related to this in, please, do you still expect stable to slightly growing volumes for the full year? Thank you.
I'll start. Price levels. What we're focusing on here is now the price-cost gap, and it will look very different in different geographies and for different categories. As Fredrik mentioned, we have promoted slightly more on consumer tissue in Europe, for instance, which then has a negative impact on price. On the other hand, this is the area where costs have come down the fastest. It's all about managing the specific situation in that category, in that market, at that point in time, and to make sure that we come out with higher margins than before. Of course, giving away as little price as possible and adding a positive mix component continuously.
Really difficult to give a more clear answer, which I can do regarding your second question, de-stocking. No, we don't expect that there has been de-stocking really among our customers and consumers here in the Q2, so no kind of positive reversal from that area. However, when it comes to your last question, of course, it will be challenging to have flat volumes on an annual basis since we're down 3.1% after the H1 year. Part of this, as Fredrik mentioned several times, is actually also subject to that we are focusing on margins before volume also. Having said that, we believe that we will gradually improve here throughout the rest of the year, but also from a volume perspective.
From a kind of high level overall perspective, it is more important for us to focus on the margin expansion ahead of volumes. Of course, it's a fine balance. I want to add there that we're naturally also really following market shares, and overall, that's looking quite good, actually. We're gaining market share in approximately 40% of our branded positions, and we're stable in over 40% of our branded positions. That's looking quite good in spite of the strong focus we have on price cost, the price-cost gap.
The next question comes from Celine Pannuti, calling from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. Thank you. My question is regarding cost outlook. First of all, I was a bit surprised that the cost was still quite elevated in the Q2. Could you help us understand the moving part of where you see inflation? Magnus, you mentioned that costs had gone down the fastest, I think, in Europe. We've seen that pulp prices is down in the 20%-25%. I'm a bit, yeah, a bit even surprised about your lower cost sequentially guidance. Can you say whether it will be a deflation in the Q3 or not yet? Thank you.
Fredrik, I'll leave that to you.
Hi, Celine. Thanks for your questions. I think I got it right, but if I start with the first one, you're surprised about, if I understood it, the cost development here in Q2, and of course, it is, it's quite observable, and you are quite aware of course, the lag impact. A market price adjustment in, for instance, pulp takes roughly about 3 months or a bit more than that to actually flow through. Of course, that has to do with shipment times and of course, process times and inventory and all of that. That's the reason. There is no kind of secret there. Of course, that lead time is longer if you take SAP or nonwoven or other oil-based products as an example.
It's not strange. When you look at the overall picture, when it comes to sequential development, I think I mentioned that when it comes to raw material, we will see that lower in Q3 compared to Q2. In on that question, I can confirm, I think, what you actually said there.
The next question is from Charles Eden, calling from UBS. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just one other one from me, and it's actually on Vinda. Can you help us understand what's going on there, please? I appreciate it, Guillaume Delmas, you see pulp prices falling dramatically in China, yet the gross margin fell slightly sequentially for Vinda in Q2 to 25%. The EBIT margin was only 10 basis points higher. If there isn't an ability to recover profitability in this environment, like you've seen, I guess, in the balance of Essity's business, it's difficult to see how it will improve. Could you just help me understand the dynamics in, for Vinda and in China, please? Thank you.
Yeah, thanks for asking that, Charles. I think it can partly also answer Celine's question because, of course, this was a disappointment also for us. What we're seeing with Vinda, and I know that this is also what they stated when they reported earlier today, is that they did in order to secure supply actually build a pulp stock towards the end of last year. That's quite significant and priced on very high levels. Due to slower than expected growth in China, they are still producing from this pulp stock, which leads to these elevated costs that are impacting not only Vinda, but the entire group, and of course, having a quite negative impact on Essity's overall margin.
I mentioned at the beginning of my presentation, if you would take out the businesses under strategic review from the margin calculation, the rest of Essity would be at 12.5%, and most of that gap difference down to 10.7% is actually attributable to Vinda. Of course, that's not good in the quarter. Going forward, I think that Vinda mentioned also in the call that they expect positive gradual margin progression, and this is by working through that pulp stock, actually. And of course, also working very much with price increases and managing prices in a good way. That's the basic reason for the performance of Vinda in the Q2.
Next question is from Jeremy Fialko, calling from HSBC. Please go ahead.
Hi. Hi there. Just got a couple of questions on consumer tissue. The first one is, obviously the organic growth there slowed down very dramatically from Q1 when we look either on the sort of branded or on the private label side. Could you talk a bit about the factors behind the slowdown? The second thing is, you mentioned in your comments that there's been a little bit more promotion in kind of consumer tissue in Europe. Again, can you give us a bit more details about that, and whether you are budgeting for a kind of, you know, continual increase in promotion levels as you go through the H2 of the year? Thanks.
Yeah, we are budgeting for higher promotional levels also to balance volumes and the market shares. Consumer tissue Europe is one area where we have seen some down trading to private label and to lower value products, actually, in the quarter. We are working to counter this now going forward with some more promotion levels, but also with an extensive kind of launch program, where we are relaunching our product assortment to focus more on kind of the cost efficiency from a user and consumer experience. Having said that, again, we're very much focused on the margins and, you know, when there's a question, we stick to defending the margins over volume. We expect to see an improving balance here going forward.
Of course, as Fredrik referred to also, having help from lower raw material costs here in the coming quarters in consumer tissue. That gives us more room to maneuver in this area.
Perhaps we can add there, Magnus, also, that if you look at the general market, Jeremy, it's actually also down. It's not just us, it's actually the market is down for various reasons now in the Q2, and of course, that will gradually stabilize.
The next question comes from Karel Zoete, calling from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please, go ahead.
Yes, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I have a question on cash flow, actually, which was not very strong in the H1 of the year, despite a significant increase of the Operating Profit. Can you speak a bit about the cash flow generation, and particularly, what's going on in the Networking Capital, and how you see that evolving in the rest of the year? Related to that, the exits from Russia, do you actually how do you get the cash out of the country? Will we actually see a cash in in Q3 of SEK 1.2 billion? Thank you.
Yeah. Yeah, I'll just give the short answer, Fredrik.
Okay.
The short answer on cash flow is that we expect a strong cash flow during the H2 of the year, and to see the result of this strong performance in operating profit and revenue generation. That's the short answer. The short answers about Russia, we have the money, so it's in the bank. Then I hand over to you-
In Europe.
In Europe.
It's already done.
It's already done.
Yeah.
Yeah. That's why we waited so long for the announcement. We wanted everything to be done and registered and completed before announcing. Over to you, Fredrik.
Yeah, I can comment a bit on cash flow. I think the short version is, of course, that we will improve quite significantly here in Q3 and 4. And technically, in what has basically happened here is that, referring to what Magnus said earlier, when it comes to the significant pulp purchases in China, that Vinda did in the end of last year, they have been repaid. The movement you are actually seeing in cash flow is all related to working capital. If you look at it specifically, it's mainly relating to payables. We see slightly lower production volumes in Europe, which actually has a negative impact when it comes to payables, and the same as I mentioned, for Vinda.
It's mainly payables, and maybe just to add on that, it's actually just a temporary impact. When it comes to inventory, we are having actually a good development there. This is why we are so confident when it comes to cash flow as we go forward. It's more temporary nature.
We did build some excess stock over the last year or 2 when we had supply chain disruptions and were focused on keeping high service levels. We are reducing stock levels again to levels that we saw more closely to what we saw before the pandemic and the issues last year. A positive development expected in the H2.
The next question is from Faham Baig, calling from Berenberg. Please, go ahead.
Hi, good morning, guys. Thanks for the questions. A couple of small ones on Professional Hygiene, if I may. Are you able to quantify the restructuring efforts on volumes in Q2 versus the end market demand? Should we assume the restructuring efforts double as you exit businesses in the U.S. in Q3? Secondly, on the business, the returns of the business have improved pretty impressively over recent quarters and now stand at around 23%. Historically, I think, if I'm not mistaken, you were targeting the division to reach a ROCE of 18%-20%, and that's far exceeded your expectations.
What is the end goal, do you think, the returns of this business could reach, particularly as you ascribe to another 200 basis points of margin improvement coming from the restructuring efforts?
Thanks for highlighting Professional Hygiene, because it's such a well-performing business. I always say that this is an area where we have such great opportunities going forward because we are the global number one, and it's an area that's, to some extent, less competitive than others. No one is investing as much as we are doing behind systems, strategic products, dispenser systems, as we are. Really kind of having momentum there. Partly what we're actually seeing in this quarter and the very high returns is benefits from pricing ourselves out of some of the lowest margin, basic product assortments in anticipation of the restructuring.
The way we've gone about with this is to just raise prices as high as we can, and as we start to lose volumes, we can then restructure. This actually gives a kind of boost to the margins already in this quarter. Going forward, the volume impacts of the restructuring efforts. Fredrik, do you want to? Yeah, Faham, we said when it comes to the European restructuring, that it's low single digit impact for Q3 and the first part of 2024, and that's actually been the case already in the Q2 here. We've had that low single digit impact. And of course, the impact for the U.S. restructuring, as we have outlined now during this call, is about the same.
If you kind of add that together, it's mid-single digits, roughly. Of course, highlighting the obvious, Faham, the profitability impact is quite strong.
Next question is from Oskar Lindström, calling from Danske Bank. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. First off, just like to revisit this, what's happening with prices, especially in consumer goods and for consumer tissue. I mean, we've heard announcements from several retailers, that they are cutting their toilet paper prices up to, I think it was 12%, starting July. Now, my, my question here is, I mean, are these the types of price declines in line, you know, on the shop shelves? Is that in line with what you're, sort of, facing for your consumer tissue business in Europe?
You know, is there a risk that just as your price increases lagged cost increases when pulp was going up, that we're now sort of in a situation where your price, you know, prices will be going down quicker than your costs come down as pulp costs come down? Also, was there any negative impact from revaluation of finished goods inventory from lower pulp prices impacting results, you know, in this quarter?
Thanks. Okay, I'll start with the first 2 questions. We can't comment on specific percentages, and of course, it looks quite different in different markets. Yes, we do expect the increasing promotions. Having said that, we know that the retailers have fully compensated themselves throughout the last year or 2, and that they have been actually having quite reasonable margins in our categories. It's, I mean, that's the starting point, just to mention that. Secondly, the price cost gap, we're getting back to that. We are firmly convinced, with our strong brands, our strong market positions, our go-to-market, the trust we built with the retailers, that we can increase that gap so that we can manage prices, so that even if they come down, they come down less than the cost, thus expanding our margins.
That's absolutely our focus, and that's also a reason why we're talking so much about, you know, prioritizing margin before volume. That's what we're doing, that's what you're seeing in the improvements in margin quarter-over-quarter, and that's what we're going to continue to do. Then when it comes to the revaluation, Fredrik?
Thank you so much for that question, Oskar. I'll be happy to answer it. Just to add maybe to the previous one there, that we have been able, and that, we've said many times, we have been able to increase prices a lot in consumer tissue. To a large extent, the price cost gap has been managed there.
Mm.
We have one big exception, and, we've already alluded to it during this call, and that, of course, relates to Asia or to China, in more specific terms, where we still have quite some distance to travel. Of course, there, we need to continue to improve.
Mm.
When it comes to revaluation, this is a technical accounting issue. That's why I said what I said just a second ago. Of course, this is just the lag impact. Yes, there are negative impacts from stock revaluation, but this is just due to the fact that we buy, and we process, and then we sell. We don't have the actual spot prices for pulp the same day we sell. Of course, we have bought the pulp that or whatever material in a previous occasion in compared to when we sell it. We always have that lag impact. You shouldn't think so much about stock revaluation, Oskar. It's just that this is the cost we have for the products we sell at this point in time.
Of course, yes, in our books, and we talked about that when Celine asked her question before, they will gradually come down, so our cost will kind of approach market prices over time.
Can I ask you, Fredrik, when there is big swings, rapid movements in the underlying input costs?
Yeah
this becomes more noticeable.
Absolutely.
Is that correct?
Let's just.
Oscar, I'm supporting you here.
Yeah.
Okay.
Yeah. It just takes time for us to get to realize the actual cost. It's no more difficult than that, Oskar.
Next question is from Patrick Folan, calling for Barclays. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. You mentioned volumes are lower but improving over time. I'm assuming that's still within the full year outlook of flat to slightly up volumes for 2023. From my understanding, there was a destocking impact in the quarter. Is it possible to quantify how much of that impacted the top line volume decline of minus 3.6? Should we expect any destocking impact in Q3, especially considering where prices are going within consumer tissue? Thanks.
... Yes, sorry, then I was unclear. No, we did not see really any destocking impacts in the Q2. We don't expect to see that in Q3 either. Actually, now that we've seen lower volumes of 3.1% in the H1, of course, it's very challenging then to recover all of that in the H2 of the year. What we expect now is to see improving volume development in the H2, but I think on the full year now, it's quite challenging to see flat to increasing volumes. This is also to not a small extent due to that we have this strong focus on pricing over volume. I hope I was more clear now.
The next question is from Oscar again. Oskar Lindström calling from Danske Bank. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you for taking my second question here. I realize we're busy today, but just on Ukraine, I mean, I read somewhere before that Essity had been placed on Ukraine's blacklist for not having left Russia. 2 questions on this. I mean, number 1, are you now off the Ukrainian blacklist? Second, I've also read that Russia is forcing companies who want to exit to pay, I think it's a 10% contribution to the sort of war budget fund, from the sales price or face a deferment of payment. Were you forced to make such a payment? Those were my two questions.
No, we have not made such a payment. To your first question, because there's such a massive misunderstanding here when it comes to this so-called blacklist, and now I'm, my blood is flowing here, Oskar. I'll spend 2 minutes on this. At the time of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Kyiv School of Economics, they put up a list of all foreign companies active in Russia, 3,350 something companies, and urged them to leave. All the companies who have had activity at the time of the invasion are on that list, all 3,300. There's no blacklists where companies are coming and going. It's the list of companies in there.
Now, looking 1.5 years later after they created that list, 7% of those companies have fully exited, and Essity is 1 of them. We're 1 of the first companies. We're really proud about that. It's been a huge effort, very complicated. We have the money in the bank, we have all the registrations, we have not paid any fee. I think this will be big trouble for many of the companies that are still there. If you include with those who have exited, the 7%, those who have significantly reduced their business or are stating that they are aiming to leave the country, that's about 1/3 of these 3,300. The rest are still active in the market.
I'm really, really proud that we are one of the first, and we've done it in a successful way, and we had a deal where everything has been approved, from a sanction perspective, 10 times in 100 different jurisdictions. Done and dusted, and there is no blacklist.
Very good to hear. Thank you.
Okay, you can look at leaverussia.org and look at the numbers for yourself and check for different companies.
Thank you. I will do that.
Okay.
The next question is from Tom Sykes, calling from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Morning, everybody. firstly, back to pricing again, sorry. I think you previously said the waterfall of pricing coming down with the energy-related cost coming down first, then promotions up, and then list prices, if they came down, would be coming down last. Where on that waterfall would you put yourselves at the moment, please? On the volume side, I think you had some pre-buying last year, and I know you're saying there's no destocking, but have you got delayed buying at the moment because of potential price decreases, and how significant is that at all, please? just on the energy costs, you released last year, reported last year, of probably a max in Q4 energy subsidy of around SEK 200 million-SEK 250 million.
Obviously, your grants and subsidies reported were higher than that in the annual report on a full year basis. I just wondered whether the sort of energy subsidies and government grants, whether you had a view on how large that would be for this year, and also where your energy trading-related revenues would be versus the circa SEK 700 million you made last year, please.
Okay. Yeah, when it comes to the pricing waterfall, what we did is that we Of course, we raised prices, and then we also added the energy surcharges. All the energy surcharges are gone. The last ones in Professional Hygiene went out in July. We're not expecting that that will have a significant negative impact going forward because much of that was converted into normal price increases in the normal contracts. Of course, now with the declining raw materials, we see that our customers, distributors, retailers, are coming back to us and, you know, talking about that price cost gap. Those are the negotiations we're in, and where we are working very hard then to increase that gap and increase our margins as raw materials comes down.
It's a bit different in the different, 3 areas. In consumer tissue, it's ongoing, as we already mentioned, very much. In personal care, in consumer goods, it's more stable. In Professional Hygiene, there are some negotiations here, not that extensive. In Health & Medical, we're actually still in an price increase move, price increase momentum because there has been a delay due to the contract structures, but also a delay in how raw materials have moved up and down over the course of time. Slightly difference there, but overall, of course, now with the quite rapid decline we're seeing in costs in many areas, the negotiation is not anymore to raise prices, but rather to manage prices and the margin. I hope that answers your question.
The pre-buying, we saw some pre-buying, I think, in the beginning of the year, but not really in the second, in the Q2. We saw that at the end of last year and the beginning of this year, but not in the Q2. We don't expect that to have a negative impact on the Q3. Energy subsidies, I don't think we are planning to have any energy subsidies. Those were extraordinary subsidies due to the extraordinary situation last year. We don't have anything that in our books. That SEK 700 million, I leave to you, Fredrik.
Yeah, I'm a little bit unsure, actually, what you were referring to when it comes to SEK 700 million. I can just confirm that we just don't have any specifics when it comes to energy cost in the quarter, so there is no trading gains, and we don't really trade in energy from that perspective. There are hedges, as I referred to earlier, but we don't have any trading gains, and there are no subsidies here in the Q2. I think one other question you asked there was relating to potentially delayed purchasing, which is not dissimilar to destocking. As you referred to earlier, Magnus, we don't see a lot of that in the Q2, to our knowledge, at least.
Okay. Yeah, thanks.
The next question is from Kari Rinta, calling from SHB. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks. Kari from Handelsbanken. I have a question on your fixed cost. You mentioned the words salary inflation 16 times in the report today. As you have seen, many global companies have made quite significant reductions in their headcount, and they have been amply rewarded by your actions. I acknowledge that you are making these efforts, these sort of focused efforts in Professional Hygiene and in some other parts of your business. The question is that, how are you thinking about your, sort of, white-collar employee base, given that you have made these investments into IT systems in recent years, and the pandemic must have sort of accelerated some of the efforts to make increased flexibility in your system?
Are you comfortable with the level of your fixed costs, given what you know about volumes and what you know about the expected demand for the coming quarters?
We're quite comfortable with how things are progressing. We are continuously taking out costs, both in cost of goods sold, when it comes to staffing levels, and also in SG&A. There are many efforts ongoing, and many kind of smaller programs and projects in different parts of the group. We are definitely seeing efficiencies from digitalizations. There's no doubt about that, and also efficiencies coming from our shared service centers that we established a few years ago in Portugal, in Lisbon, and in Santa Fe, in Mexico. There are a number of initiatives ongoing. Actually, overall, I don't see that we have a big challenge here, so maybe we actually mentioned too many times in the report.
We had a one-time impact now in the Q2, as we have many times from... in this quarter because of that's when the salary increase for the Q1 also accounted for. Other than that, I think we will have good control, and we'll continue to have good control also going forward on these costs. Anything you want to add there, Fredrik?
No. Yeah, maybe, Kari. First of all, thanks for reading our report so thoroughly and even counting words there. It is, I think, important to mention here that the increase of cost is related to inflation and not actually to headcount increases, so I think that's worth actually mentioning. I think there is one other factor. We spent considerable amounts, and we have been talking about that many times before on not revitalizing, but building a new IT platform, which has been very successful. We've implemented the pilot, and we are now proceeding with the updated versions, and over time, we'll roll it out completely. That's a very good project, and over time, that will enable quite sufficient or quite large efficiencies as we also go forward.
From that perspective, I think we are actually taking a lot of action in line with what Magnus was talking about, and we will continue to do that. Then we have further potential as we roll out our IT environment. I think we are in a good shape when it comes to SG&A resources.
Okay, I think we have 5 more minutes now, so, we have time for a few more questions.
That's right. Yeah. Next question is from Mikheil Omanadze. Sorry for the pronunciation. BNP Paribas Exane. Please go ahead.
Hi, Mikheil Omanadze here from BNP Paribas Exane. One question from me. Can you please comment on the competitive environment, particularly in tissue? In your view, has private label already recovered its profitability to the levels where they can engage into meaningful price concessions and still make money at all? Thanks.
Again, I think where we have a challenge is in China with consumer tissue in Vinda. Clearly, as you also can see from their report. In Europe, I feel that we have a very, very good and stable starting point. We have long relations with the retailers, partnerships, we have high service levels, good quality products, and we have quite margins that we think are where they should be, and that we will be able to protect and work with those margins going forward as we see raw materials coming down further here in the next quarter.
Very clear. Thank you.
Maybe just to add, I guess the private label division, as we have created it, has, quite good margins in.
Mm
general, so it's performing really well.
You said it more clear than I did, Fredrik.
Yeah.
Okay.
Maybe.
You might be on mute. It's your turn. Please go ahead.
Sorry. Thank you for taking my question. My question is on Russia. I know you stated that it's only about 2% of group sales last year. Can you share how much it was of profitability? I'm just guessing that you probably were not investing much for growth in the market, so we could see a bit of a margin drag from the deconsolidation of that business from Q3. Any detail you can give there, that'll be great. Thank you.
Fulvio, I can... I mean, once again, Russia is a couple of % of our net sales, or I should say, was a couple of %. The margin impact on the group level from taking Russia out is absolutely negligible, so it doesn't have an impact, in short. Though we've had, of course, volume impacts as we have reported on, so there's been gradual negative volume impact, and we have told you about that every quarter. From that perspective, from a sales growth perspective, it has been negative before, but from a margin perspective, really no impact.
Thank you.
Let's take 2 more questions, we sum up.
The last question here is basically from Simen Aas, calling from DNB Markets. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Good morning, guys. I have just one question, that's regarding: could you just remind us what are the underlying volume development, if you adjust for Russia and all the ongoing restructuring efforts, just to get a feel for how much the underlying volumes are down? Thank you.
I can't really do that because it depends on what you mean by underlying. If you exclude Russia and the diapers business there, that has an impact on the overall volume of roughly about 0.6%. Of course, in addition to that, we have, as we have reported, exits of contracts in baby, we have the PH restructuring, and we have exits of various contracts that have had much too low profitability. Of course, that also has another impact that we haven't actually quantified. If we just take the diapers in Russia, it's roughly about 0.6%.
Okay, it's still fair to assume that it is negative, right?
Yeah, the underlying is negative, yes.
Yeah. Okay, thank you.
There are no further questions, so I will hand it back to you host to conclude today's conference. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you for a good discussions, good questions. We are progressing. We have good momentum. Our organization is motivated, energized. It's great to be out of all the conundrums we had over the last couple of years with the market challenges. And we are in good shape, taking many actions to continue towards our long-term target of ROC above 17% by 2025 at the latest. Thank you for listening.