Trelleborg AB (publ) (STO:TREL.B)
Sweden flag Sweden · Delayed Price · Currency is SEK
396.80
+14.00 (3.66%)
May 6, 2026, 2:44 PM CET
← View all transcripts

Pre-close call

Mar 27, 2026

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to this summary call we do each quarter, just before winter, our silent period. You all know the purpose of this call is to make sure you are all aware of what we have communicated throughout the quarter, especially trends we see in our organic sales. For those of you who have called in before, you know the premise. In this call, I will not give out any news or figures that we have not previously communicated at conferences and seminars and other events throughout the period. You also all know that as the quarter ends later next week, you should also be aware that I'm not privy to the full quarter developments, and while I've seen the performance in January and February, the full March numbers will not be available until a week into the new quarter.

Obviously, in today's call, I cannot go into the fine details in all sub-segments, so I will, as per usual, paint with broad strokes and save the detail for when we report our results on the 23rd of April. Let's begin, as we always start this call, and that is our guidance for Q1, which we-

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Martin is-

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

As we said in our Q4 report. In late January, in connection with our Q4 report, we said that we expected the demand trends for our products and solutions to be more or less developed sideways in Q1. As a reminder, the group organic growth in Q4 was +1%. That number was dampened by the pushbacks of the project orders in industrial solutions. Despite all the world events that are happening around us, we stand by this guidance. Moving on to the business areas, we'll start with industrial solutions. In Q4, industrial solutions had an organic sales decline of 3% with a margin of 16.5%, and the decline we said was all related to project delivery pushbacks due to customers working at full capacity.

In Q1, we still see that the product sales are not really picking up from Q1, and the trend is similar, i.e., everything but the project sales are doing pretty good but hampered by this pushbacks. Now, if I should just mention some highlights among the segments I've seen so far, I can say that aerospace is doing very, very well. Automotive for this business area is actually doing okay. Then we have a very solid development for our water infrastructure, which is, by the way, a new business unit in Industrial. It's been you know, carved out and stands on its own legs in Industrial Solutions. We'll talk more about water infrastructure in the coming quarters.

Again, the decline is then coming from project sales within gaskets in commercial construction or infrastructure construction, which is down, and that is very much due to what I mentioned already, i.e., our customers are working flat out and cannot take accept more deliveries from us until they have pushed out their own sales through the factories. That goes also for port and marine projects. All in all, I could say that some of these projects are quite profitable. Since we have a little bit of a worse mix here, I expect the sales, the organic sales to be similar to what could be slightly better, I don't know yet, but that's my feeling now.

The margin will probably come down due to the sales mix, i.e., we have some high margin product sales which we expected to deliver in Q1, but it looks as if it's going to be pushed back. I cannot, at this point, say exactly when we will deliver these pushback projects, but it will take place this year at least. It shouldn't have any impact on the year as a whole. It's just variations between the quarters, if you will. I should also mention that we have a really good book-to-bill in the quarter so far in Industrial Solutions, which then goes to show that it's not the underlying markets that are deteriorating. On the contrary, we are on very solid ground here.

If anyone has any particular questions that I may be able to answer, please raise your hand, and I'll see if there's any questions on Industrial? Yes, Vivek.

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Hi, good afternoon, Christofer. Thank you for taking our questions. My question is just around the growth dynamics you highlighted. You know, we've still got these pushbacks impacting you. The comp is slightly easier in the quarter. You have about 2 percentage points easier comp. And so just thinking about that, you're saying that the book-to-bill is developing well. In terms of-

... the underlying deliveries, I mean, is the underlying level of deliveries slightly weaker in Q1 just given that you have the easier comp?

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

I mean, the comp is not always, you know, related to the project sales, of course. It's the full business area. I couldn't really say anything about that at this point.

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Okay.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

If you read between the lines, I said, you know, we had a -3% in Q4, and I expect similar, but I also alluded to the fact it could be slightly better.

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Good. Okay, cool. Thank you. Thank you.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Still negative, but you know, we're talking about small numbers here from that point of view.

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Okay.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Okay.

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Great. Thank you.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Upen.

Speaker 5

Hi, Christofer. It might just be I wasn't clear. Do you mind just explaining the margin expectations just for the quarter? Is it sort of negative mix from the energy projects and therefore potentially lower margins in the quarter?

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Yeah, a little bit. I expect a little bit lower margins, and that is something we have said throughout the quarter at seminars and conferences also. We mentioned it also at the conference we attended last week in London. A little bit lower margin, but again, this will then be all related to some high margin project pushbacks. This is for, just to make clear, this is just for this business area. Any further questions on industrial? Okay. I'll move on then to Medical Solutions. In Q4, i.e. in January, we said that we saw that Medical Solutions had an organic sales of a very solid 5%, had a record margin of 21.9%. In Q1 so far, these are some of the trends that we've noted.

The Medical Device North America, i.e., the largest business unit, is still growing slightly but still sees softer demand compared to Medical Device in Europe, which is smaller, but it's growing at a very nice clip currently. We have the small or the smallest third part of this business area, which is the Life Science segment, and that explains about some 15% of the business area, and that is enjoying very strong growth currently. I would say that this solid growth of 5% we had in Q4, you know, the developments we've seen so far is very similar to what we saw in Q4, i.e., I would expect the growth to be similar in Q1 as compared to Q4.

However, I also have explained many times that we are focusing on a relatively few number of customers in the MedTech and Life Sciences segments, i.e. we are focusing on the 70 largest customers. If we compare that with Sealing Solutions, which has more than 10,000 customers, then of course there are variations of between the quarters. The underlying growth we've said for this business area should be around 5%+, and that is what we expect for this quarter as well. Now, in terms of margin, I believe there will be slightly lower than the record high 21.9% we saw in Q4. That was abnormally high, to be honest, I believe at this stage.

We have also some factory openings that we are ramping up during the course of this year. For instance, we opened up, inaugurated Costa Rica in December, so the ramp-up will take place during 2026. Not a major impact on the margin, but on balance, it's a little bit dampening. Now, still good clip in terms of growth for this business area and we have, as we've said many, many times, we have quite big ambitions with Medical Solutions, i.e. we want to keep the margin about above 20%, and we want to grow this at the clip of more than 5%, and we are on course to achieve that also in this quarter. Any quick questions on Medical?

Again, I cannot go into more details really. Until we release the report, this is just a summary of what we've said so far this quarter. Any medical solutions questions? Raise your hand if you have it. Okay. It doesn't appear to be any questions on medical solutions. Hopefully, everything is clear. I move on to our largest business area, which is Sealing Solutions. In Sealing Solutions in Q4, it had an organic growth of 5% with a margin of 20.2%. What I've seen so far in Q1 is that the industrial segment is improving a little bit. That is, if I break it down on the regions, I do see that it's growing basically organically in all three major regions.

In MEA, though, this small growth we see in MEA is driven by price increases rather than volume. Volume looks to be flattish. In Industrial APAC, organic is actually growing due to higher sales volume. We see a real pickup there. Now, in Industrial Americas, it's actually on a positive trend here due to price increases and slightly higher volume also. From the Industrial segment, yes, it looks good. The automotive segment, our second-largest, explaining about 28% of the business area, that is weaker. This is due to the weak, especially the weak aftermarket sales for damping, which we've been talking a lot about.

You know, we are producing those in Kalmar in Sweden. It's one of the very few products we actually ship across the Atlantic or to Asia. Due to the tariffs, we've lost some business there. It's the same story as in the previous quarter. This is a high-margin product, so of course, that has a little bit of an impact on the margin due to it's being down. Is it worse than in Q4? No. It's probably a little bit better, but it's still negative. Then we come down to the Aerospace segment, and we see very strong sales in Aerospace and both organically, but we have also made some acquisitions here. We have done some price increases, and we see higher sales volumes across all segments.

This then boils down to, for the business area, that we see an organic sales growth similar to Q4 when it was 5%. We also see, due to the mix with the very strong aerospace segment, slightly higher margins in Q1 compared to Q4. Also here, I should mention that the book-to-bill is strong. Now, any questions on Sealing Solutions? Please raise your hand if you have any. No? Good. Let me then summarize on the group level. Yes, from an order book perspective, we continue to grow the order book. The book-to-bill is good. We have a strong basis entering 2026.

What's happening in the war in Iran and the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, we don't really see any direct impact on us, but it could very likely dampen customers' order pattern if the war is dragged out. Of course, we are not immune to the situation, but we don't see any real impact, direct impact on us. As you hopefully know, we are very local for local, which means we also source locally. I would say from a group perspective, our local sourcing is probably up there at 85%-90% of everything we source comes from our local markets. If we summarize what I've said about the business areas, I believe you will find an organic sales development in Q1, which is very similar to Q4.

I also believe that we will have slightly lower margins due to the project sales pushbacks than we achieved in Q1. That's the overall view. Of course, I haven't seen the latest situation or the last two weeks now in March and the coming week in March. There could be some variations on what I've seen to what I've said today compared to what we will see in a couple of weeks' time when I get the final numbers. I hopefully have given you enough feedback so that you can do your calculations correctly. Any last chance now to ask any questions. We have an AGM coming up, by the way.

We do expect the AGM to approve of continued buybacks and to the tune of, you know, what we've said before. Okay, we have some questions here. Vivek again.

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Thanks very much for taking the follow-up. I just had a question about the broader impacts of the Middle East situation, thinking about raw materials, oils, and so on. Oils is an input into polymers, and so the potential cost impact there. Also, when we try and do screens around different companies' energy usage, I guess the energy intensity of your productions may be towards the higher end of some of the capital goods companies. So I was just wondering if you might be able to give us some thoughts around what potential cost scenarios we can work with. You know, what sort of lead times you have before we can get price increases through. How should we think about those as gross and net impacts? Thank you.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Yeah. I can divulge that our energy cost is around EUR 50 million, which is, you know, quite limited. I'm not really sure if it's much bigger than anyone else. On the contrary, it's actually lower according to what I've seen and... It's very manageable. Yes, of course, it's not good if the prices go up very much. As you know, Vivek, our very strong positions in these small niches where we operate and the fact that we don't have any list prices that are revised every six months. As soon as we see prices go up, inflation go up on raw materials, then we pick up the phone and call our customers, and very, very often, if not always, we are able to push that increase onto our customers.

That is why we don't see any major impact from the energy cost. Of course, transportation and so forth, yes, shipping and etc. I think, considering that we are local for local and, you know, we don't ship much on ships from one continent to the next, I think we are relatively unharmed by the much higher cost. Of course, you have cost for trucks, you know, for diesel and fuel and so forth, and that is something that we are pushing on to our customers. Yes, that's what I mean by not having seen much impact from the situation so far. We are more wary about how it, you know, will affect the mood of our customers, i.e. an indirect impact going forward if this war is dragged out. Minimal impact so far.

Yes, we are wary it could impact our customers' ordering pattern going forward. You had some additional question also, I believe. Yes. You mentioned the oil, synthetic rubbers and so forth are oil derivatives, but this is raw material increases. We, you know, we, the amount we purchase of synthetic rubber is quite limited in relation to our total COGS. So, it's actually less than you know, we have so many different prices to watch, hundreds of different materials that we buy in, chemicals, textiles, metals, and so forth. I wouldn't say that the synthetic rubber stands out in terms of in weight of our total cost, if you will, for COGS.

Yes, we have not lost sleep over this situation because we know from experience that we are able to push on higher raw material prices onto our customers. Now, some of you know, we've said it many, many years, that we actually prefer when raw materials go up because we are priced at a very high level, premium price compared to competition, which means that the competition, when the raw materials go up, they are forced from a percentage point of view to raise their prices more than we do. Very often we benefit from rising raw material prices, and it also gives us more of a good motive to raise our own prices. I hope that's a way-

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

That's clear. Thank you very much.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Thank you, Vivek. Yes, Agnieszka?

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yes. Thank you. I'll just turn on my camera. Yeah. Maybe I didn't catch it really. On Sealing Solutions, if you can repeat what you expect in terms of organic growth in Q1. Will it be at, you think, similar level in Q4, or is there any reason that it shouldn't be as good?

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

No, we expect similar. I could say actually, just to summarize again.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yeah

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

... from Industrial Solutions, we expect similar growth, a negative-

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yeah

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Perhaps slightly better, but I still don't know because it's, you know.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Mm-hmm

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

deliveries of projects. It was -3%, we expect similar.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yep

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Slightly better. In Medical, we had 5% in Q4 organic, and we expect the same in Q1. In Sealing Solutions, we grew organically by 5%, and we expect similar in Q1, which then gives us this, you know.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yes

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

overall guidance of having a similar development for the group in Q1 as we had in Q4.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yeah, correct. Then also on Sealing, with that growth, organic growth that you do see and expect now, why shouldn't we expect a bit, maybe better, you know, conversion margins and improvement in margins?

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Well, I did say that we expect the margins to improve a little bit in Q1.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Yes.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Yeah. Mm.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Okay. Thank you.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Thank you. Uwe, your hand is raised.

Speaker 5

Hi. I think Vivek kind of covered my question, but just to check, any price increases you saw in the quarter, did that kind of relate to any inflation you're already seeing, or that was just

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Yes. I mean, that is of course to cover for some inflation we've seen in some energy prices and some in raw materials. We're covering ourselves and perhaps then some in a few business units, but I cannot really give any more clues on that. We'll have to wait until the 23rd of April. Yeah. Vivek, you still have your hand up. Do you-

Vivek Midha
Equity Research Analyst, Citi

Apologies.

Christofer Sjögren
Head of Investor Relations, Trelleborg

Do you have an addition? Yep, no. Okay. All right then, I'll try to sum this up. I, of course, will be much more available and discuss much deeper once we have reported. I just want to give you some flavor of what we have communicated at conferences and seminars, and I thank you all for your attention, and have a great weekend. Thank you.

Agnieszka Vilela
Analyst, Nordea

Thank you.

Agnieszka Vilela
Research Analyst, Nordea

Thank you.

Powered by