Good day. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Aecon Group Q1 2021 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentations, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you require any further assistance, press star zero. I would now like to hand the call over to your host, Adam Borgatti. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Felita. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for participating in our first quarter 2021 results conference call. This is Adam Borgatti speaking. Presenting to you this morning are Jean-Louis Servranckx, President and CEO, and David Smales, Executive Vice President and CFO. Our earnings announcement was released yesterday evening, and we have posted a slide presentation on the investing section of our website, which we will refer to during this call. Following our comments, we'll be glad to take questions from analysts. We ask that analysts keep to one question and a follow-up before getting back into the queue to ensure others have a chance to contribute. As noted on slide two of the presentation, listeners are reminded that the information we're sharing with you today includes forward-looking statements. These statements are based on assumptions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties.
Although Aecon believes these expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the expectations will prove to be correct. I'll now turn the call over to David.
Thanks, Adam, good morning, everyone. I'll briefly summarize Aecon's consolidated results, review results by segment, then address Aecon's financial position before turning the call over to Jean-Louis Servranckx . Turning to slide three. Revenue for the first quarter of CAD 754 million was CAD 7 million or 1% higher compared to last year. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of CAD 21 million, a margin of 2.8%, improved by CAD 2 million, or 8%, compared to adjusted EBITDA of CAD 19 million, a margin of 2.6% in Q1 last year.
Diluted loss per share of CAD 0.31 in the quarter, compared to a diluted loss per share of CAD 0.19 in the same period last year, largely due to interest related to the Bermuda Airport Concession that is now being expensed rather than capitalized. Reported backlog of CAD 5.9 billion compares to backlog of CAD 7 billion a year ago. Turning to results by segment.
As noted on slide four, construction revenue of CAD 744 million in the first quarter was CAD 9 million or 1% higher than the same period last year due to a higher volume of nuclear refurbishment work in Ontario and an increased volume of gas distribution and telecommunication work in the utility sector. Partially offsetting these increases was lower revenue for road building and mainline pipeline work. Adjusted EBITDA from construction of CAD 22 million, a margin of 3%, increased by CAD 5 million compared to CAD 17 million, a margin of 2.2% in Q1 last year, primarily from higher volume and gross profit margin in utilities and higher volume in nuclear. These increases were partially offset by lower volume and gross profit margin in industrial operations.
New contract awards of CAD 200 million in the first quarter, were CAD 696 million lower than last year, largely due to an award of CAD 465 million in the first quarter of 2020 for the Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project in B.C. Turning to slide five. Concessions revenue for the first quarter was CAD 11 million, a decrease of CAD 16 million compared to the same period last year, primarily due to much reduced activity at the Bermuda International Airport. Adjusted EBITDA in the concession segment of CAD 10 million was CAD 4 million lower than last year due to the COVID-19 impact on airport operations in Bermuda. Turning to slide six. Aecon's financial position, liquidity, and free cash flow remain strong.
On March 31st, Aecon had CAD 31.5 million of cash on hand, excluding cash in joint operations and restricted cash, and a committed revolving credit facility of CAD 600 million, which was undrawn other than CAD 7 million utilized for letters of credit. In the first quarter of this year, the performance security guarantee facility provided by EDC to support letters of credit was increased from CAD 700 million to CAD 900 million, bringing Aecon's committed credit facilities for working capital and letters of credit to CAD 1.5 billion. Aecon has no debt or working capital credit facility maturities until the second half of 2023, except equipment loans and leases in the normal course. At this point, I'll turn the call over to Jean-Louis Servranckx .
Thank you, David. Turning to slide seven. Despite the impact of COVID-19 on Aecon's first quarter results, we continued to deliver solid results. We remain confident that Aecon's balanced and diversified portfolio, strong financial position, and agile culture will enable us to successfully respond to the unknown impacts of COVID-19 going forward. The construction segment is aligned to the significant infrastructure investment commitments by all levels of government across Canada, as well as by the private sector, providing essential services across the market sectors in which we participate. The concession segment is pursuing a number of large-scale infrastructure projects and targeting innovative development and private finance opportunities in industrial, power, clean tech, and other related markets, as well as participating as a concessionaire on the five P3 projects identified on the slide.
Turning now to slide eight, backlog recurring revenue programs and the pipeline of bidding opportunities for new work remain at strong levels across Canada, despite the challenges of a pandemic environment. Backlog at the end of the first quarter was CAD 5.9 billion, which does not include the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Advanced Tunnel Project in Toronto, where an Aecon consortium has been named as first negotiations proponent, and which is expected to be awarded in the second quarter of 2021. We expect demand for our services to remain healthy for the foreseeable future as the federal government and provincial governments across Canada have identified investment in infrastructure as a key source of stimulus as part of economic recovery plans.
Aecon is pre-qualified on a number of large project bids due to be awarded during 2021 and 2022, and have a robust pipeline of opportunities to further add to backlog over time. Trailing 12 months recurring revenue was up 5% versus the prior period, primarily from growth in utilities operations. Recurring revenue is expected to continue to grow based on the capital investment plans of a number of key clients, particularly the telecommunications and power sectors, as well as from the recovery of aviation traffic at the Bermuda International Airport. Turning now to slide nine. Earlier this week, Aecon released its second annual sustainability report, Building Better Together, outlining our progress and key accomplishments in responsible ESG practices. The report includes a comprehensive greenhouse gas inventory of direct emissions from all our operations in 2020, a best-in-class practice, and a significant step in the evolution of Aecon's sustainability program.
Aecon Group has proudly announced that it has set a target to reach net zero emissions by 2050, with an initial interim target to achieve a 30% reduction in direct CO2 emissions by 2030 as compared to 2020. This positions Aecon Group as an industry leader and underscores our commitment to harness innovation, reduce waste, boost efficiency, and consistently improve business performance. The sustainability report is available on our website, and we welcome you all to view it and see why we are so Aecon Proud.
Turning to slide 10, Aecon's overall outlook for 2021 remains positive despite the ongoing background of COVID-19. The pandemic is expected to continue to have some impact in moderating overall revenue and profitability growth expectation in 2021, either due to client decisions related to schedules or operating policies, or due to broader government directives to modify work practices to meet relevant health and safety standards.
In particular, in the concession segment, commercial operations at the Bermuda International Airport continue to be challenged by COVID-19 related travel restrictions, which are significantly impacting the aviation industry. Global air traffic is not expected to improve meaningfully until significant portions of the global population have been vaccinated and existing travel restrictions are lifted. The bright spot for Bermuda is that the U.S. is by far the largest source market for passenger volume, followed by the U.K. Both countries are our leaders in vaccine rollouts, so we are optimistic the second half of 2021 will see meaningful improvement. As I stated earlier, the overall outlook for 2021 remains positive as construction continues on a number of projects that ramped up in 2019 and 2020, the level of backlog and new awards during 2020 and the strong demand environment for Aecon services, including recurring revenue programs. Thank you.
Stay safe, get vaccinated, and follow the advice of public health authorities. We will now turn the call over to analysts for questions.
At this time, if you would like to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. That's star one to ask a question. There is a question from the line of Yuri Lynk with Canaccord.
Hey, good morning, everyone.
Good morning, Yuri.
Just wanted to dig in a little bit on the new awards. I get the tough year-on-year comp, CAD 200 million in new awards, I think that's the lowest level I've seen in looking back about eight years or so. Jean-Louis, anything to call out in terms of what happened on maybe on the smaller awards? Sometimes you're quite successful in booking a number of small jobs. More importantly, is this a low for the backlog for this year? Do you see it increasing by the end of the year? Any color would be appreciated. Thanks.
Okay. Yuri, as we have already and always said, to look at the backlog evolution only on a three-month period is not always relevant. As you can see, we have CAD 5.9 billion of backlog plus the CAD 0.5 of recurrent backlog. We will have some quasi-backlog at the moment, during the weeks to come. It means for me that it's not a real issue so far. I've always said that between six and seven, including recurring revenue, we are comfortable. If you go to slide eight and you have a look at the central figures about what is going to be earned in the next 12 months, you just realize that at the end of Q1 2019, the figure was CAD 2.3 billion. At the end of Q1 2020, CAD 2.5 billion, increasing. At the end of Q1 2021, CAD 2.7 billion, increasing.
It just means that you can anticipate revenue growth in the year to come. For the long term, which is beyond 24 months, there's plenty of time. I just remind you, Yuri, that this was the plan. The plan was about discipline on major projects and balancing our activities, especially growing utilities within our backlog. We said it constantly during the last 20 months, and we did it. We are focused on delivering our ongoing important projects. Of course, we have an eye on the very important pipeline. You see in the following slides, CAD 40 billion expected. We are answering to pre-qualification five from owners every month. In one year, only on one project we have not been pre-qualified. It's overwhelming success for being pre-qualified. You know about it. Ontario Line, Civil Ontario Line, RSSOM, which is a rolling stock and signaling.
RE, which is a huge job. VIA Rail maintenance facility, both in Toronto and Montreal. REM Airport Station, Annacis Tunnel. Probably had a look at the Budget BC for the first time. It's written again, George Massey Tunnel, which is all tunnel, which is a very important job. I remind you that we were the preferred bidder a few years ago on this one. Laurentia Port, Quebec LRT, the prolongation of REM, where obviously we're going to be pre-qualified. We are executing at the moment first phase of REM. It just means that it's not a real issue. We have an eye on it. Quality is extremely important, and we are extremely focused on it.
Okay. That's great color. I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks, guys.
Your next question comes from the line of Frederic Bastien with Raymond James.
Hi. Good morning, guys.
I'd like to get a bit more color on sort of the successes you've had on the utility side. You do flag sort of the telecommunication sector and also power-related work as sort of very encouraging. Would you mind just expanding a bit further on that?
Yeah. We are extremely happy with our utility sector. You probably realized about it. As I've just said to Yuri, this was the plan, and we did it. Telecommunication is going extremely well. Telus and Bell have a lot of new CapEx program in place. You've probably heard also about CIB, about all around broadband. Enbridge in gas distribution also is extremely active. District heating within downtown geothermals. Everything is moving in the right direction in terms of electricity. We have noticed the trend just emerging in terms of transmission and distribution. This is why we did this acquisition of Voltage Power Ltd. We are very happy about this activity. In addition, the contractualization of this kind of revenue is different, is very much interesting. It gives a lot to loyalty with our customers, to our professionalism, and this explain why utilities is one of our top performers today.
Thank you. I read that that represents about 25% of your top line. As you continue to gain a fair amount of success there, is there potential for that part of the business to increase further from 25%?
I would say yes and no. Yes, because we like this business and it's quite a good complement to our roads and bridges work, to our heavy civil urban transportation and nuclear. On another hand, you remember that I'm always focused on having a balanced activity, and each time I close a price, before bidding, I'm careful about it. I think our balanced activity is one of the main reasons of our strength and our resilience. We will have a look at it, but every opportunity that we can take with profit generation in utility, we're going to make it.
Awesome. Okay. Thank you.
Your next question comes from the live line of Benoit Poirier with Desjardins Securities.
Yes. Good morning, everyone.
Good morning.
Jean-Louis or David, I was wondering if you could provide more color about the expectation for CEWS in the coming quarter. My understanding, this was not material in Q1. In terms of capital deployment, maybe how do you see buyback versus M&A at the current point in time, and also the maximum financial leverage you would be willing to consider under M&A?
Okay. I'll try and remember the different elements to that. I'll start with CEWS, and if you have to remind me, Benoit, then come back to me. I think going forward, we expect CEWS to be even lower than it was in Q1, in Q2, and Q3. The program was initially meant to end on June 5th, and the federal government, on Monday, announced that they were going to extend it to September 25th. For that extension period, or at least from July to the end of September, the subsidy rates start to reduce fairly significantly over that period of time. That will reduce any subsidy just because the rates are lower. We're also comparing revenue to periods last year that were obviously heavily impacted by COVID. The first hurdle is, are you eligible on a revenue decline basis?
Given those periods we're comparing to, we're not expecting much, if any of our business to be eligible. Even to the extent we are, the rates are going to be quite low. CEWS, we expect to be pretty much a non-factor in 2021. On the capital allocation side, obviously we remain open to tuck-in type acquisitions. We think there's still opportunity. Going back to the previous question around utilities, we've done a number in that space, and we think there's still opportunity there, but also in other areas as well. That remains something that we're focused on. Obviously, we increased our dividend last quarter for the full year. As far as share buybacks, that's something that we'll continue to monitor, but nothing in place at this point in time. I think you had a question on leverage as well, Benoit?
Oh, just in terms of M&A, assuming something more larger could come at one point in time. Just wondering, how do you see the financial leverage, the optimal level you would be willing to go at, David?
Obviously, we're in a nice position today where leverage is very low, in and around 1x EBITDA. We're very comfortable anywhere up to 2x. Obviously, the focus for us is having the performance security capacity, whether that's bonding, whether that's LC facilities, to support growth, and to support the pre-qualification process for what we expect to be a huge pipeline of opportunities continuing to come at us over the next couple of years. Preserving that balance sheet strength is important. In terms of a larger acquisition, we think up to 3x is certainly manageable, without impacting any of that capacity in terms of performance, security and growth. Much further than 3x, we would start to see that being something that wasn't sustainable for any lengthy period of time.
That's great color. Thank you very much for the time.
Thanks, Benoit.
Your next question comes from the line of Jacob Bout with CIBC Capital Markets.
Good morning.
Morning, Jacob.
Morning, Jacob.
I was hoping you can provide an update on how much work has been pushed out due to COVID over the past 12 months. I think you said at 2020 end, you said it was around CAD 390 million. How is this reflected in backlog and as we think about kind of year-on-year comps for backlog?
Yeah, it's exactly what you say, Jacob. We consider that something like CAD 400 million have just been pushed to the right, and it's a sort of timing issue, and we can see it today. What is important to note is that no project future prospect has been deleted after this COVID pandemic. It's not a worry for us. We have noticed this around Q3 last year, and it's exactly what was expected.
Okay, maybe just a follow-up. You've committed now to a 30% reduction in direct CO2, 2030 net zero by 2050. Can you talk about ESG as a criteria in the procurement process? Is there any talk of this happening right now? Does it differ between private sector and government?
It's a very interesting question. For the last 10 years, I'm coming from Europe. You probably remember in September 2018, I arrived in Canada. Europe is more advanced than North America on these topics. For the first time within the last 10 years, I'm just convinced that the wave is coming. It means that more and more of our discussions are about ESG. With our clients, you imagine that they also are on their way to disclose their commitment for 2030, medium-term, and 2050, and by contracting with Aecon, who has committed to ambitious achievements with this. It just helps them. You probably remember that you have three group when you speak about greenhouse gas emission.
The first one is a direct, the two other one are rather indirect, when an owner contracts with Aecon and Aecon makes a lot of effort to reduce its GHG emission, it's good for him. We are trying to have as much as we can, criterias for being awarded, which are linked with our efforts, related with ESG, it's coming. I just can see that it's coming.
Okay. Thank you.
Maybe I can add something else. All these efforts of good, of course it's good for the Earth, it's good for the planet, but it's good for Aecon Group . At the end of the day, we just realize that it's just about working better. It's just about eliminating waste. It's just about consuming less to have the same result. It's just about being more efficient, and this is why we are embarking with a lot of enthusiasm in this movement.
Your next question comes from the line of Michael Tupholme with TD Securities.
Thank you. Good morning.
Good morning.
Morning, Michael.
My first question is, just when I look at the construction segments beyond the productivity challenges that have been an issue to one extent or another throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, based on what you know today, can you provide some commentary on the extent to which you expect any COVID-19 related restrictions, be they government directed or client directed, to affect the business in Q2 and beyond, if you have any visibility? Specifically, I'm thinking about the fact that there were some restrictions in B.C. in the first quarter. Not sure what the status is as far as those projects. Then we've had some recent announcements in Ontario. I know that relates to non-essential work, but just looking for any commentary on all of that, please.
To make it simple, basically, we are still essential services in all provinces. It means that we can go on working. There may be some restrictions, but we are essential service. We have to work. Second point, we are just getting better and better with this COVID-19 in terms of organizing our work, in terms of protecting our employees, in terms of screening, in terms of rapid testing. Each time we have an alert on a job, we're just becoming very good. There is a need for vaccination, obviously, so that COVID can get out from the landscape as soon as possible. There will be, in the future, some consequences about some other restriction. I just say we can now cope much better about it.
Okay. No, that's helpful. Thank you. Second question relates to the nuclear operations. Nuclear activity in the construction segment appears to have picked up in the first quarter after having been slower in 2020. I'm just wondering, is the nuclear work you're carrying out, is that still ramping up further from here, or was the level of activity you were running at in the first quarter, is that representative of what we should expect over coming quarters?
Okay. Basically, we have more activity now because we are working on two units, two reactors. I remember that during the last two years, we were working only on one unit in Darlington. The work has been achieved. The reactor has been connected back to the grid, a great success. Now we are working on the second reactor, plus the turbine generator in Darlington, and we are working on the first reactor of Bruce and the first steam generator replacement. This explain why we have more activity. I remind you that we have a contract for four reactors at Darlington Nuclear Generating Station, and at Bruce Nuclear Generating Station, we have a contract for one with an option for the five remaining. We are working on this, on the remaining one with Bruce Power and discussing about the condition of execution.
This will give you a trend for the, I would say for the year to come. Regarding the much longer term, I would say we have three areas of great interest. The first one is about waste treatment. All those major component replacement on these two nuclear power plant just produce a lot of waste. Waste has to be treated, and treated efficiently, and we are working on this. Second part, I would say, small modular reactor. This is going rather fast. OPG has selected three technical partners. We have an association, and we are partnering with the three of them. It's a very interesting future opportunity for us. The last one is about dismantling. You know that Pickering will be dismantled in the year to come. We are actively working with OPG preparing this big job.
nuclear, it's not only a problem of short term, it's about medium term and longer term for us.
Okay. No, thanks for that, and I appreciate the commentary on the longer term. That's helpful. Thank you.
Your next question come from the line of Mona Nazir with Laurentian Bank.
Good morning. Congratulations on results. Thank you for taking my question.
Morning, Mona.
Morning. I understand the last year has been a complete whirlwind for you guys. I'm just wondering from your perspective, and I understand these things change, but currently, what are the greatest levers that could positively impact you? Obviously, the vaccine rollout. Is there anything else that perhaps we're not putting enough weight on? Then conversely, what are the most significant risk factors? I know, Jean-Louis Servranckx , you just spoke to the productivity on the productivity front and getting better and better, is there anything else we should be cognizant of or something that's top of mind for you? Thank you.
Obviously you have to begin with COVID. COVID is still a risk. People are still dying from COVID. We don't have to forget it, and we cannot lower our guard on COVID. In terms of improvement, evidently, productivity is extremely important. We have been speaking a lot about continuous improvement program. I want to put Aecon Group in the position of delivering better than any other infrastructure company in this country. At the end of the day, the result of Aecon Group is just the sum of the results of its projects. On each project, execution is a key word. We are also working a lot on our design integration capacity. It mean being able to streamline the design at the beginning of the project, being able to optimize in terms of quantity and to optimize in terms of constructability.
We still think there is a lot of improvement to obtain from there. Opportunity, definitely, the growth of population in Canada. The standard is about half a million newcomers every month. I've just noticed, last week, an announcement by the government of Canada about easing and streamlining some permanent resident requisite for a certain number of categories. The movement is there, the trend is there. All those people need means of transportation. They need power, they need clean water, they need energy, and this is good for Aecon Group . Risk, as you have noticed, COVID is a risk. Obviously on each job, we can always have some competitors that decide to have some, I would say, a reckless attitude, and we have to be careful. We are extremely disciplined.
We know what our targets, because they are the one fitting perfectly with our strengths, and this is what we are looking at to prevent this risk.
Okay. That's great. Thank you. I'll step back into you.
Your next question come from the line of Sabahat Khan with RBC Capital Markets.
Hi, thanks. Just a question on sort of the pipeline of work and the mix of your revenues right now. In terms of the projects that you're seeing in the pipeline, I guess, and some of the infrastructure announcements that have come through, is it more shorter terms or book-and-burn projects, or is it longer-term projects that are taking a little bit to come through? Secondly, is there any sort of implication of that on your mix of fixed cost versus cost plus projects? Seems like that's run up a little bit into the 60% range over the recent quarters. Just want to get an understanding of the type of projects that are out there in the pipeline.
Okay. First question, short-term, mid-term, long-term, I would say it's much more about mid-term and long-term activities. Short-term is just being fed, I would say, naturally. Those projects, there's always a time to bid, a time for evaluation of our bid and financial close when it's a design-bid finance or a design-bid finance operate and maintain. Then after you just begin with some design activity, utility relocation in most of our jobs. Mid-term and long-term is the real answer. Your second question was about the mix of our activities, we are extremely focused on balancing as per our sectors, as I said, but we are also interested in balancing the size of our project, the geography of our project, and the mode of contractualization. I'm not worried about the mix. It's still under what we like.
I just remind you that it's not as simple as to say a fixed price is difficult and unit price is easy. Just go for example, for the normal bread-and-butter job with the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, they are all unit price job. You have 14 competitors. You have to be extremely wise and smart about your competitive advantage. They are hard projects, and you cannot make any mistake during execution. Some lump sum, we are just two at the end of the process to compete. I'm comfortable with what we have at the moment in our backpack.
Okay. Just a quick housekeeping one. Just looking at the expenses year-end, it looks like the materials line is down about 25% year-over-year, from Q1 of last year to Q1 of this year. Just want to get an understanding of, is that a one-time thing or is there some sort of cost savings in there as we try to forecast this out for the rest of the year?
Yeah. Hi, Sabahat. The biggest driver of that mix is really the project profile that is being worked on in any particular quarter. Some projects in some periods have a higher content of subcontractors versus our labor. Some projects, if they're ramping up, will have a higher materials component in the earlier phases. It's really just a timing thing quarter to quarter, and it's very difficult to get any read-through as to what that means in subsequent quarters. It isn't really a driver of our overall profitability or impacts on our cost base. It's just one cost replacing another type of cost in any particular quarter based on the activities that are underway. Yeah, I wouldn't read too much into that.
Okay. I guess for the full year, it should just be normal course, I'm sure I'm swiveling the expenses line in either direction then?
Well, in any given year, again, it can skew more to one cost category than another, depending again on the type of work. That doesn't really play into our margin profile or anything like that because these are all costs that are part of a job, and whether a job has a higher material component or a higher subcontract component, it's all part of the overall price of the job. It doesn't really impact anything from an overall margin perspective. Having said that, generally over the course of a year, yes, it kind of evens out, all else being equal in terms of the kind of portfolio of projects we have underway.
Okay, great. Thanks so much for the color.
Your next question comes from the line of Devin Dodge with BMO Capital Markets.
Thanks. I wanted to ask about your facility with Export Development Canada. Can you provide some color on what projects that can be used for and maybe the reasons behind increasing it? I think the last time we saw Aecon increase that facility was shortly after you were awarded that contract for the Bermuda International Airport. Just wondering if there's some additional international work that you're looking at.
Yeah. Hi, Devin. The EDC facility primarily is used to support larger P3 type projects within Canada or internationally. It can also be used to support projects that have an indirect export element to them. If it's to support a project within Canada that will be used to increase trade with the U.S., for example, Gordie Howe International Bridge would be a good example of that. Given that it's a P3, it would be included anyway, but even if it wasn't, that would still qualify, or a manufacturing facility that was designed to ship products overseas. Anything with really an export angle or a P3-type project. Having said that, given the COVID issues last year, EDC did extend the applicability of the performance security guarantee that they provide, so it can be applied to any project at this point in time.
At some point, that will revert back to just P3s and export-related, so not necessarily international. The reason for the increase is really, we've talked already on this call, but also in the materials and on previous calls about the strength of the market we expect going forward. We want to build the capacity now, as opposed to trying to build that capacity once we're awarded those jobs. This is really just about continuing to build our capacity for performance security ahead of the growth that we see coming over the next few years based on the strength of government investment programs and infrastructure.
Okay. That's helpful. Thanks for that. Maybe just sneak in a quick modeling question for you, David. Pretty notable cash tax payment in Q1. Just can you help us understand what drove that and how we should be thinking about cash taxes for the balance of the year?
Yeah. That's primarily a one-off in the first quarter. It's really a consequence of the fact that through 2020, obviously, we have to make installment payments through the year, and those installment payments in 2020 are based on the mix of profits from 2019, where we obviously had a significant contribution from Bermuda, which is tax-exempt. That mix changed in 2020, where Bermuda International Airport obviously was significantly impacted by COVID. We had the benefit of the CEWS program in 2020, which is fully taxable. Those installment payments that are made during the course of the year, which is set kind of at the start of the year, were not sufficient to take into account that change in mix.
In the first quarter of the following year, you have to kind of top up those installment payments to the extent you need to, and that's what happened in the first quarter. Going forward, we're just back to the regular installment payments that we have to make.
Okay, thank you. I'll turn it over.
Your next question comes from the line of Ian Gillies with Stifel.
Okay. Good morning .
Morning.
One of the interesting disclosures that you're not pursuing a project in Seattle with respect to roadworks. I'm just curious on, is there anything about that particular market that made you choose that one, or what perhaps is pulling you into that market in the U.S. to take a look at?
Ian, the first part of your question, I could not understand. There was a problem in my audio. Can you do it again, please?
Yeah. I was just curious as to what may be pulling Aecon into bidding on a project in and around the Northwest U.S., specifically Seattle. If there is anything, I guess, pulling you there.
Okay, got it. The U.S. is ready to embark on a very ambitious program about infrastructure. We cannot not have a look at it. The main parameters for us to go, I would say, would be two. The first one is that it has to be within the core competency of Aecon Group . I'm not going to change country and change competency. It has to be on a scope of work that we perfectly master in Canada. The second parameter is about partnering, either with peers of the same category than us or with local companies, to be sure that we can make it, and we can make it profitably. This is the way we are going to look at the market of infrastructure renewal in the U.S.
Switching gears maybe a little bit here. I think everyone's well aware of all the infrastructure spending. When do you think some of that spending will translate into new project announcements that may not yet be known by the market and those sorts of things?
Are you speaking about United States or Canada?
Canada, specifically.
I think we have a fair knowledge of what is coming. It means that you probably remember when COVID emerged, there was a lot of talk about shovel-ready projects. In infrastructure, this doesn't work like this. It means that you cannot, on Friday, decide that you're going to begin to build an infrastructure job on Monday. This doesn't work. You have a lot of preparation. You have a lot of environmental assessment, right of way, the permits, utility relocation. We have quite a good visibility on the specific projects, and we also have visibility on the global envelope from the provincial government, from the CIB, from the federal government.
I would not expect surprises. We just have to focus on the right project in front of our strengths, find the right partners, the right designers, the right teams, and make it happen.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Your next question comes from the line of Chris Murray with ATB Capital Markets.
Thank you. Good morning. Jean-Louis Servranckx , you've talked a little bit about vaccinations in your workforce, and I guess a couple of parts to this question. One, do you have the ability to track which of your employees at the local level are actually vaccinated? I guess the other thing, what's your expectation as we go later into the year? Do you foresee there'll be certain jobs where there'll be restrictions that everyone on the site might have to be vaccinated in order to be able to do the work?
Okay. Just to smile at the beginning, I've been vaccinated because of my age. I'm between 59 and 60, within the last days, and I'm very happy about it. No, we don't know, and we cannot force our guys to be vaccinated, evidently. What we can is just, it's not only about education, but it's about communication. It's about promoting and just explaining it through our internal channels, the benefits of being vaccinated. Obviously for our activities, the quicker, the better.
All right. I guess the other part of the question is, I know certainly the health regulations keep changing, but you start thinking about things where folks will be working maybe in remote areas and have to be working out of camps and things like that. Do you foresee anything that might mandate that anyone working on those sites would have to be vaccinated?
So far, no. For example, on Site C, the authorities of B.C. just provided with quite a number of vaccine and have begun some vaccination campaigns. Site C is a campsite. This is a trend at the moment, and we shall see, I think within the next week, what is the evolution and how Aecon can participate as proactively as it can, depending on laws and regulation to this movement.
All right. I'll leave it there. Thank you very much.
Okay, your final question comes from the line of Naji Baydoun with Industrial Alliance.
Hi, good morning.
Morning.
Just wanted to get your thoughts on a couple of ESG-related priorities. First off, can you talk about any long-term opportunities you see from additional construction work on new decarbonization initiatives? Just wondering how you're thinking about your approach and positioning to capitalize on new opportunities, infrastructure related, on new low or zero emission projects in Canada.
Evidently, there is a trend, and I would say supplementary pipeline that we just begin to see emerging about all those jobs, especially in energy, battery storage, for example. Also, geothermal is rising. District heating is rising. That is the difference of temperature between some phreatic level of water or lake water and the atmosphere. There's quite a number of very interesting and technical projects. What is also interesting is that there's a big chunk of them that go through private initiative within the public areas, and we like it. There may be some concession schemes. There may be public-private partnership, and it's very important for us. We have a team only dedicated to track and assess all those new projects coming in.
Do you think that team is sort of where you want it to be, or do you think you need to make more investments, either in capabilities or people to be able to best position yourself to capitalize on those opportunities?
We will have to recruit in addition to what we have at the moment. We have a dedicated team at the moment, but as I was saying, 20 minutes ago, the wave is coming, and I think it's not going to be stopped. We have to be ready, and we are extremely proactive. You have seen with our second sustainability report about our disclosure, about our commitment. We have to stay at the forefront of the construction industry in Canada, and most probably we will add more capacity to be there.
Okay. That's good to hear. Thank you. Just to follow up to that, to your last point, the second sustainability report, very clear new environmental targets clearly help celebrate your ESG profile versus your competitors in the construction sector. Just wondering if you have any thoughts on additional targets that you're thinking about, either on the environmental side or maybe on the social or governance side?
I don't know what I can do better than a zero net in 2050, and 2050 is far. What is sure is that we are totally focused today on 2030 and trying to make the good decision to be able to go there. I think we have set up our targets now, and from this, we are relentlessly working to make it happen.
Okay. Appreciate that. Thank you.
There are no other questions at this time.
Thank you very much, everyone. As always, if there's any follow-up questions, feel free to reach out, and we wish you a good rest of your day. Stay safe, and we'll speak to you on the next call. Take care.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.