Good day. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Aecon Group Q1 twenty twenty one Earnings Conference Call. This time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. I would now like to hand the call over to your host, Adam Bogarty.
Please go ahead.
Thank you, Felida. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for participating in our first quarter twenty twenty one results conference call. This is Adam Borgatti speaking. And presenting to you this morning are Jean Louis Servranx, President and CEO and David Smales, Executive Vice President and CFO. Our earnings announcement was released yesterday evening, and we have posted a slide presentation on the investing section of our website, which we will refer to during this call.
Following our comments, we'll be glad to take questions from analysts. We ask that analysts keep to one question and a follow-up before getting back into the queue to ensure others have a chance to contribute. As noted on Slide two of the presentation, listeners are reminded that the information we're sharing with you today includes forward looking statements. These statements are based on assumptions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Although Wacom believes these expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the expectations will prove to be correct.
I'll now turn the call over to Dave.
Thanks, Adam, and good morning, everyone. I'll briefly summarize Aecon's consolidated results, review results by segment and then address Aecon's financial position before turning the call over to Jean Louis. Turning to Slide three, revenue for the first quarter of $754,000,000 was $7,000,000 or 1% higher compared to last year. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of twenty one million a margin of 2.8% improved by $2,000,000 or 8% compared to adjusted EBITDA of $19,000,000 a margin of 2.6% in Q1 last year. Diluted loss per share of $0.31 in the quarter compared to a diluted loss per share of $0.19 in the same period last year, largely due to interest related to the Bermuda Airport concession that is now being expensed rather than capitalized.
Reported backlog of $5,900,000,000 compares to backlog of $7,000,000,000 a year ago. Now turning to results by segment. As noted on Slide four, construction revenue of $744,000,000 in the first quarter was $9,000,000 or 1% higher than the same period last year due to a higher volume of nuclear refurbishment work in Ontario and an increased volume of gas distribution and telecommunication work in the utility sector. Partially offsetting these increases was lower revenue for road building and mainline pipeline work. Adjusted EBITDA from construction of $22,000,000 a margin of 3% increased by $5,000,000 compared to $17,000,000 a margin of 2.2% in Q1 last year, primarily from higher volume and gross profit margin in utilities and higher volume in nuclear.
These increases were partially offset by lower volume and gross profit margin in industrial operations. New contract awards of $200,000,000 in the first quarter were $696,000,000 lower than last year, largely due to an award of $465,000,000 in the 2020 for the Patuho Bridge replacement project in BC. Turning to Slide five, concessions revenue for the first quarter was $11,000,000 a decrease of $16,000,000 compared to the same period last year, primarily due to much reduced activity at the Bermuda International Airport. Adjusted EBITDA in the Concessions segment of $10,000,000 is $4,000,000 lower than last year due to the COVID-nineteen impact on airport operations in Bermuda. Turning to Slide six, Aecon's financial position, liquidity and free cash flow remained strong.
At March 31, Aecon had $31,500,000 of cash on hand, excluding cash and joint operations and restricted cash and a committed revolving credit facility of $600,000,000 which was undrawn other than $7,000,000 utilized for letters of credit. In the first quarter of this year, the performance security guarantee facility provided by EDC to support letters of credit has increased from $700,000,000 to $900,000,000 bringing Aecon's committed credit facilities for working capital letters of credit to $1,500,000,000 Aecon has no debt or working capital credit facility maturities until the 2023 except equipment loans and leases in the normal course. At this point, I'll turn the call over to Jean Louis.
Thank you, Dave. Turning to Slide seven. Despite the impact of COVID-nineteen on Aecon's first quarter results, we continued to deliver solid results. We remain confident that Aecon's balanced and diversified portfolio, strong financial position and agile culture will enable us to successfully respond to the unknown impact of COVID-nineteen going forward. The construction segment is aligned to the significant infrastructure investment commitments by all levels of government across Canada, as well as by the private sector, providing essential services across the market sectors in which we participate.
The Concessions segment is pursuing a number of large scale infrastructure projects and targeting innovative development and private finance opportunities in industrial power, fintech and other related markets as well as participating as a concessionaire on the five P3 projects identified on the slide. Turning now to Slide eight, backlog recurring revenue programs and the pipeline of bidding opportunities for new work remain at strong levels across Canada despite the challenges of a pandemic environment. Backlog at the end of the first quarter was $5,900,000,000 which does not include the Eglinton CrossFound West Extension advanced tunnel project in Toronto, where an Aecon consortium has been named as first negotiations proponent and which is expected to be awarded in the second quarter of twenty twenty one. We expect demand for our services to remain healthy for the foreseeable future as the federal government and provincial governments across Canada have identified investment in infrastructure as a key source of stimulus as part of economic recovery plan. Aecon is pre qualified on a number of large project bids due to be awarded during 2021 and 2022 and add a robust pipeline of opportunities to further add to backlog over time.
Trailing twelve months recurring revenue was up 5% versus the prior period, primarily from growth in utilities operation. Recurring revenue is expected to continue to grow based on the capital investment plans of a number of key clients, particularly the telecommunications and power sectors as well as from the recovery of aviation traffic at the Bermuda International Airport. Turning now to Slide nine, earlier this week, Aecon released its second annual sustainability report, Building Better Together, outlining our progress and key accomplishments in responsible ESG practices. The report includes a comprehensive greenhouse gas inventory of direct emissions from all our operation in 2020, the best in class practice and a significant step in the evolution of Aecon sustainability program. Aecon has proudly announced that it has set a target to reach net zero emissions by 2050 with an initial interim target to achieve a 30% reduction in direct CO two emissions by 2030 as compared to 02/2020.
This positions Aecon as an industry leader and underscores our commitment to harness innovation, reduce waste, boost efficiency and consistently improve business performance. The sustainability report is available on our website and we welcome you all to view it and see why we are so Aecon proud. Turning to Slide 10, Aecon's overall outlook for 2021 remains positive despite the ongoing background of COVID-nineteen. The pandemic is expected to continue to have some impact in moderating overall revenue and profitability growth expectation in 2021, either due to client decisions related to schedules or operating policies or due to broader government directives to modify work practices to meet relevant health and safety standards. In particular, in the concession segment, commercial operations at the Bermuda International Airport continue to be challenged by COVID-nineteen related travel restrictions, which have significantly impacted the aviation industry.
Global air traffic is expected to improve meaningfully until significant portions of the global population have been vaccinated and existing travel restrictions are lifted. The bright spot for Bermuda is that The US is by far the largest source market for passenger volume followed by The UK, both countries that are leaders in vaccine rollouts. So we are optimistic the 2021 will see meaningful improvement. As I stated earlier, the overall outlook for 2021 remains positive as construction continues on a number of projects that ramped up in 2019 and 2020. The level of backlog in new awards during 2020 and the strong demand environment for Aegon services, including recurring revenue programs.
Thank you. Stay safe, get vaccinated and follow the advice of public health authorities. We will now turn the call over to analysts for questions.
At this time, if you would like to ask a question, press 1 or your telephone keypad. Press 1 to ask a question. And there is a question from the line of Yuri Lynk with Canaccord.
Hey. Good morning, everyone.
Good morning, Eric.
Just wanted to dig in
a little bit on the new awards. I get the tough year on year comps, but $200,000,000 in new awards, I think that's the lowest level I've seen in looking back about eight eight years or so. So, know, Louis, any anything to call out in terms of, you know, what happened on maybe on on the smaller awards? Sometimes, you know, you're you're quite successful in in booking a number of small jobs. And more importantly, you know, does is is this a is this a low for for the backlog for for this year?
Do you see it increasing by by the end of the year? Any color would be appreciated. Thanks.
Okay. Yuri, as we have already and always say, I mean, to look at backlog evolution only on a three month period, I mean, is not always relevant. I mean, we as you can see, we have 5,900,000,000 of backlog plus the 500,000,000 of recurrent backlog. We will have some quarterly backlog at the moment, I mean, during the weeks to come. It means for me that it's not a real issue so far.
I always say that between 6,000,000,000 and 7 including recurring revenue, I mean, we are comfortable. If you go to Slide eight, I mean, and you have a look at the central figures about what is going to be burned in the next twelve months, You just realized that at the end of Q1 twenty nineteen, the figure was €2,300,000,000 At the end of Q1 twenty twenty, 2,500,000,000.0 increasing. At the end of Q1 twenty twenty one, 2,700,000,000.0 increase. It just means that you can anticipate revenue growth, I mean, in the year to come. For the long term, which is beyond twenty four months, I mean, there's plenty of time.
And I just remind you, Yuri, that this was the plan. The plan was about discipline on major projects and balancing our activities, especially growing utilities within our backlog. We say it constantly during the last twenty months and we did it. We are focused on delivering our ongoing important projects, but of course, we have an eye on the very important pipeline. I mean, you see in the following slides, 40,000,000,000 expected.
We are answering to prequalification five from owners, I mean, every month. And in one year, only on one project, we have not been prequalified. I mean, it's overwhelming success for being prequalified. You know about it. I mean, line, Seville, Ontario line, RECCOM, which is a rolling stock and signaling, REL three, which is a huge job, Virel maintenance facility both in Toronto and Montreal, REM Airport Station, ANASYS channel.
Probably, had a look at the budget in BC for the first time, it's written again, George Massey Bridge, which is all tunnel, which is a very important job. I remind you that we were the pre trade bidder, I mean, a few years ago on this one. Laurentia Port, Quebec LRT, the prolongation of REM where obviously we're going to be pre qualified. We are executing at the moment, first phase of of REM. It it just means that it's not a real issue.
We have an eye on it. Quality is extremely important, and we are extremely focused on it.
Okay. That's that's great color. I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks again.
Your next question comes from the line of Frederic Bastien with Raymond James.
I'd like to get a bit more color on sort of the successes you've had on the utility side. You do flag sort of the telecommunications sector and also power related work as sort of very encouraging. So would you mind just expanding a bit further on that? Yeah.
We are extremely happy with our utility sector. You you probably realized about it. I mean, as as I've just say to Yuri, this was the plan, and and we did it. Telecommunication is is going extremely well. I mean, TELUS and Bell have a lot of new CapEx program in place.
You've probably heard also about CIB, about all around broadband. But Enbridge in gas distribution also is extremely active district heating within downtown geothermal. I mean, is moving in the right direction in terms of electricity. I mean, we had noticed the the the trend just emerging in terms of transmission and distribution. This is why we did this acquisition of voltage.
We are very happy about this activity. In addition, the contractualization of this kind of revenue is different, is very much interesting. It gives a lot to loyalty with our customers, to our professionalism. And this explain, I mean, why utility is one of our top performers today.
Thank you. And I read that that represents about 25% of your top line. As you continue to gain a fair amount of success there, is there a potential for that that part of the business to increase further from 25%?
I would say yes and no. Yes. Because we like this business, and it's it's quite a good complement to our roads and bridges works to our heavy city, urban transportation and nuclear. On another hand, you remember that I'm always focused on having a balanced activity. And each time I close a price, before bidding, I'm careful about it.
I think our balance activity is one of the main reason of our strengths and our resilience. So we will have a look at it, but every opportunity that we can take with profit generation in utility, we're gonna make it.
Awesome. Okay. Thank you.
Your next question comes from the live line of Bennett Poirier with Desjardins Capital.
Yes. Good morning, everyone. Jean Louis or yes. Jean Louis or David, I was wondering if you could provide more color about the expectation for Qs in the coming quarter. My understanding this was not material in Q1.
And in terms of capital deployment, maybe how do you see buyback versus M and A at the current point in time and also the maximum financial leverage you would be willing to consider under M and A? Okay. So I'll try to remember the different elements to that. I'll start with shoes and if you have to remind me, Benoit, then come back to me. I think going forward, we expect shoes to be even lower than it was in Q1, in Q2, and Q3.
The program was initially meant to end on June 5, and the federal government, on Monday announced that they were going to extend it to September 25. But for that extension period or at least from July to the September, the subsidy rates start to reduce fairly significantly over that period of time. So that will reduce any subsidy just because the rates are lower. But we're also comparing revenue to periods last year that were obviously heavily impacted by COVID. So the first hurdle is, are you eligible on a revenue decline basis?
And given those periods we're comparing to, we're not expecting, much if any of our business to be eligible and even to the extent we are, the rates are going to be quite low. So, SUES, we expect to be pretty much a non factor in 2021. On the capital allocation side, obviously, we remain open to tuck in type acquisitions. We think there's still opportunity, you know, going back to the previous question around utilities, you know, we've done a number in that space, and we think there's still opportunity there, but also in other areas as well. So that remains something that we're focused on.
Obviously, we increased our dividend, last quarter, for the full year. And as far as share buybacks, that's something that we'll continue to monitor, but nothing in place at this point in time. And then I think you had a question on leverage as well, Benoit? Oh, just in term of M and A, assuming something more larger could come at one point in time. Just wondering how do you see the financial leverage, the optimal level you would be willing to go at, David?
Yes. So, I mean, obviously, we we're in a nice position today where leverage is is very low, you know, in and around one times, EBITDA. We're very comfortable, anywhere up to two times. Obviously, the the focus for us is having the performance security capacity, whether that's bonding, that's LC facilities, to support growth, and to support the prequalification process for what we expect to be a huge pipeline of opportunities continuing to commence over the next couple of years. So preserving that balance sheet strength is important.
In terms of a larger acquisition, we think up to three times is certainly manageable, without impacting any of that capacity in terms of performance security and growth and much further than three times, we would start to see that being something that wasn't sustainable for any lengthy period of time. That's great color. Thank you very much for the time. Thanks, Pima.
Your next question comes from the line of Jacob Volk with CIBC.
Good morning.
Good morning, Jacob. Good morning, Jacob.
Hoping you can provide an update on how much work has been pushed out due to COVID over the past twelve months. I think you said at twenty twenty end, you said it was around $390,000,000 And then how is this reflected in backlog and as we think about kind of year on year cost of the backlog?
Yeah. I mean, the it's exactly what you say, Jericho. I mean, we we consider that something like 400,000,000 have just been pushed to the right. And it's a sort of timing issue, and and we can see it today. What is important to note is that no project, future prospect has been deleted after this COVID pandemic.
So it's not it's not a worry for us. We have noticed this around q three last year, and it's exactly, I mean, what was what was expected.
Okay. Maybe just a a follow-up. You've committed now to a 30% reduction in in direct CO2 2030 net zero by 02/1950. Can you talk about ESG as a criteria in the procurement process? Is there any any talk of this happening right now?
And, does
it differ between private sector and and government?
It's a very interesting question. I mean, for the last ten years, I'm coming from Europe. Probably remember in September 2018, I arrived in Canada. I mean, Europe is it it's more advanced than North America on these topics. But for the first time within the last ten years, I'm just convinced that the wave is coming.
It means that more and more of our discussions are about ESG. With our clients, you imagine that they also are on their way to disclose their commitment for 02/1930, medium term, and 02/1950. And by contracting with Aecon, we are committed to ambitious achievements with this. I mean, it just helps them. You probably remember that you have three group when you speak about greenhouse gas emission.
The first one is a direct and the two other one are rather indirect. But when an owner contracts with Aecon and Aecon makes a lot of effort to reducing its GLG emission. I mean, it's good it's good good for for him. So we are trying to have as much as we can criteria for being awarded, which are linked with our efforts, I mean, related with ESG, and it's coming. I just can see that it's coming.
Thank you.
Maybe I can add something else. I mean, all these efforts of good mean, of course, it's good for the earth. It's good for the planet, but it's good for Aecon. I mean, at the end of the day, we just realized that it's just about working better. It's just about eliminating waste.
It's just about consuming less to have the same reason. So it's just about being more more efficient, and this is why we we are embarking, I mean, with a lot of enthusiasm in this movement.
Your next question comes from the line of Michael Tufone with TD Securities.
Thank you. Good morning. Good morning, Michael. My first question is just when I look
at the
construction segments beyond the productivity challenges that have been, an issue to one extent or another throughout the COVID-nineteen pandemic, based on what you know today, can you provide some commentary on the extent to which you expect any COVID-nineteen related restrictions, be they government directed or client directed to affect the business in Q2 and beyond if you have any visibility? And so specifically, thinking about the fact that there were some restrictions in BC in the first quarter. I'm not sure what the status is as far as those projects. And then we've had some recent announcements in Ontario. I know that relates to nonessential work, but just looking for any commentary on all of that, please.
To make it simple, I mean, basically, we are still essential services in all provinces. It means that we can go on working. There may be some restrictions, but we are essential service. We have to work. Seven point, we are just getting better and better with this COVID-nineteen in terms of organizing our work, in terms of protecting our employees.
I mean, in terms of screening, in terms of rapid testing each time we have an alert on a job, we're just, I mean, becoming very good. There is a need for vaccination. I mean, obviously, so that COVID can get out from the landscape as soon as possible. So there will be in the future some consequences about some other restriction. I just say we can now cope much better about it.
Okay. Well, that's helpful.
Thank you. Second question relates to the nuclear operations. Nuclear activity in the construction segment appears to have picked up in the first quarter after having been slower in 2020. And I'm just wondering if is the nuclear work you're carrying out, is that still ramping up further from here or was the level of activity you were running out in the first quarter, is that representative of what we should expect over coming quarters?
K. Basically, we have more activity now because we are working on two units, two reactors. I remember that during the last two years, we were working only on one unit in Darlington. The work has been achieved. The reactor has been connected back to the grid, a great success.
Now we are working on the second reactor plus the turbine generator, in Darlington, and we are working on the first reactor of Bruce and the first steam generator replacement. This explain why we have more activity. I remind you that we have a contract for four reactors at Darlington. And at Bruce, we have a contract for one with an option for the five remaining. We are working on this on the on the remaining one with with Bruce Power and then discussing about the condition of execution.
So this will give you a trend for the, I would say, for the year to come. Regarding the much longer term, I would say we have three areas of great interest. I mean, the first one is about waste treatment. All all of these major component replacement on these two nuclear power plant just produce a lot of waste. Waste has to be treated and treated efficiently, and we are working on this.
Second part, I would say, small modular reactor. This is going rather fast. OPG has selected three technical partners. Have an association, and we are partnering with the three of them. And it's a it's a very, very interesting future opportunity for us.
The last one is about dismantling. You you know that Pickering will be dismantled in in the year to come. We are actively working with OPG preparing this big job. So nuclear, I mean, it's not only a problem of short term, it's about medium term and and and longer term for us.
Okay. No. Thanks for that, and and I appreciate the the commentary on the longer term. That's that's helpful. Thank you.
Your next question comes from the line of Mona Nazar with Laurentian Bank.
Good morning. Congratulations on results, and thank you for taking my question.
Good morning.
Good morning, Mona.
Good morning. So I understand the last year has been a complete whirlwind for you guys. I'm just wondering, from your perspective, and I understand these things change, but currently, what are the greatest levers that could positively impact you? Obviously, the vaccine rollout. But is there anything else that perhaps, you know, we're not putting enough weight on?
And then conversely, what are the most significant risk factors? I know, Jean Louis, you just spoke to the productivity on the productivity front and getting better and better. But is there anything else we should be cognizant of or something that's top of mind for you? Thank you.
So, obviously, you have begun with COVID. COVID is still a risk. I mean, people are still dying from COVID. We we we do we don't have to forget it, and and we we we we cannot lower our guard on on COVID. In terms of improvement, I mean, evidently productivity is extremely important.
I mean, we have been speaking a lot about continuous improvement program about how I mean, I wanna put Aecon in the position of delivering better than any other infrastructure company in this country. At the end of the day, the result of Aecon is just the sum of the result of its project. And and on each project, execution is the key is the keyword. We are also working a lot on our design integration capacity. It mean being able to streamline the design at the beginning of the project, being able to optimize in terms of quantity and to optimize in terms of constructability.
We're still seeing there is a lot of improvement to obtain from there. Of course, you need to, I mean, definitely the growth of population in Canada. I mean, the standard is about half a million newcomer every month. I'm just noticed last week an announcement by the government of Canada about easing and streamlining some permanent resident requisite for a certain number of categories. I mean, the movement is there.
The trend is there. All these people, I mean, need means of transportation. They need power. They need clean water. They need energy.
And and this is good this is good for Aecon. Risk, as you have noticed, I mean, COVID is a risk. And obviously, on each job, we can always have some competitors that that decide to have some, I would say, reckless attitude, and we have to be careful. We are extremely disciplined. We know what our targets because they are the ones fitting perfectly with our strength, and this is what we are looking at to prevent this risk.
Okay. That's great. Thank you. I'll step back in queue.
Your next question comes from the line of Sabaat Khan with RBC Capital Markets.
Just a question on sort of the pipeline of work and the mix of your revenues right now. In terms of projects that you're sort of seeing in the pipeline, I guess, and some of the infrastructure announcements that have come through, is it more shorter terms or book and burn projects? Or is it longer term projects that are taking a little bit to come through? And secondly, is there any sort of implication of that on your mix of fixed cost versus cost plus projects? Seems like that's run up a little bit into the 60% range over the recent quarters.
Just wanna get an understanding of the type of projects that are out there in the pipeline.
Okay. First question, short term, midterm, long term, I would say it's much more about midterm and long term activities. Short term is is just being fed, I would say, naturally. Those projects, I mean, there's always a time to bid, a a time for evaluation of our bid and and financial close when it's a design bid finance or design bid finance operate and maintain. And and and then after you just begin with some design activity, utility relocation in most of our jobs.
Big term and long term is the is the is the real answer. Your second question was about the mix of our activities, and and we are extremely focused on on balancing as per our sectors as I've said, but we are also interested in balancing the size of our project, the geography of our project, and the mode of contractualization. I'm not I'm not worried about the mix. It it's still under what what we like. I just remind you that it's not as simple as to say fixed price is difficult and unit price is easy.
I mean, just go for example, for the normal bread and butter job with the Minister of Transportation of Ontario, they are all unit price job. You have 14 competitors. You have to be extremely wise and smart about your competitive advantage. They are hard projects and you cannot make any mistake during execution. Some lump sum, I mean, have just two at the end of the process to compete.
So I'm comfortable with what we have at the moment in our backpack.
Okay. And then just a quick housekeeping one. Just looking at the expenses here, and it looks like the materials line is down about 25% year over year from q one of last year to q one of this year. Would just wanna get an understanding of is that sort of like a onetime thing, or is there some sort of cost savings in there as we try to forecast this
out for the rest of the year?
Yeah. Hi, Saba. The biggest driver of that mix is is really the project profile that has been worked on in any particular quarter. Some projects in some periods have a higher content of subcontractors versus our labor. Some projects, if they're ramping up, will have a higher materials component in the earlier phases.
It's really just a timing thing quarter to quarter and it's very difficult to get any read through as to what that means in subsequent quarters. It isn't really a driver of our overall profitability or impacts on our cost base. It's just, you know, one cost replacing another type of cost in any particular quarter based on the activities that are underway. So, yeah, I wouldn't read too much into that. Okay.
So I guess
for the full year, should
have been normal course and shouldn't swear the expensive line in either direction there.
Well, in any given year, again, it it it can skew more to one cost category than another depending again on the type of work. But that doesn't really play into our margin profile or anything like that because these are all costs that have a job. And whether a job has a higher material component or higher subcontract component, it's all part of the overall price of the job. And so, it doesn't really impact anything from an overall margin perspective. But having said that, generally, over the course of the year, yes, it kind of evens out, all else being equal in terms of the the kind of portfolio of projects we have underway.
Okay. Great. Thanks so much for the color.
Your next question comes from the line of Devin Dodge with BMO Capital Markets.
I wanted to ask about your facility with Export Development Canada. Could you provide some color on what projects that can be used for and maybe the reasons behind increasing it? I think the last time we saw Aecon increase that facility was shortly after you were awarded that contract, for the Bermuda Airport. Just wondering if there's some additional international work that you're looking at.
Yeah. Hi, Devin. The EDC facility primarily, is used to support, larger p three type projects within Canada or internationally. It can also, use to support projects that have, an indirect export element to them. So if it's to support project within Canada that will be used to increase trade with The U.
S, for example, Gordie Howe Bridge, would be a good example of that given that it's a P3, it would be included anyway. But even if it wasn't, that would still qualify, or a manufacturing facility that was designed to ship products overseas. So anything with really an export angle or a P3 type project. Having said that, given the COVID, issues last year, EDC did extend the applicability of the performance security guarantee that they provide. So it can be applied to any project, at this point in time.
But at some point that will revert back to just P3s and export related, so not necessarily, international. And the reason for the increase is really, we've talked, already on this call, but, also in the materials and on previous calls about the strength of the market we expect, going forward. And, we want to build the capacity now, as opposed to trying to build that capacity once, once we're awarded those jobs. So this is really just about continuing to, build our capacity for performance security ahead of the growth that we see coming over the, over the next few years based on the strength of government investment programs and infrastructure.
Okay. Okay. That's helpful. Thanks for that. And maybe just sneak in a a quick modeling question for you, Dave.
You know, pretty notable, cash tax payment, in q one. Just can you help us understand what drove that and how we should be thinking about cash taxes for the balance of the year?
Yeah. That's primarily a one off in the first quarter. It's really a consequence of the fact that, through 2020, obviously, we have to make installment payments, through the year, and those installment payments in 2020 are based on the mix of profits from 2019, where we obviously had a significant contribution from Bermuda, which is tax exempt. That mix changed in 2020 where Bermuda obviously was significantly impacted by COVID, but we, had the the benefit of the SEWS program in 2020, which is fully taxable. And so those installment payments that are made during the course of the year, which is set kind of at the start of the year, were not sufficient to take into account that change in mix.
And so in the first quarter of the following year, you have to kind of top up those installment payments to the extent you need to, and that's what happened in the first quarter. Going forward, we're just back to the regular, installment payments that we have to make.
Okay. Thank you. I'll turn it over.
Your next question comes from the line of Ian Gilles with Stifel.
Okay. Good morning.
Good morning. One of the
interesting disclosures
that you're
not pursuing a project in, not just at Seattle with Roadworks. I'm just curious on if there's anything about that particular market that made you choose that one or what what perhaps is, pulling you into that market in the to take a look at?
I I mean, the the first part of your question, I I could not understand. There was a problem, in my audio. Can you do it again, please?
Yeah. I was just curious as to whether or what may be pulling Aecon into bidding on a project, in and around the Northwest US, specifically Seattle, and if there is anything, I guess, pulling you there.
Okay. Got it. United States is ready to embark in a very ambitious program about infrastructure, so we we we cannot not have a look at it. The main parameters for us to go, would say would be two. The first one is that it has to be within the core competency of Aegon.
I mean, I'm not gonna change country and change competency. It has to be on the scope of work that we perfectly master in Canada. And the second parameter is about partnering either with peers of the same categories as us or with local companies to be sure that we can make it and we can make it profitably. This is the way we are going to look at, at the market of, infrastructure renewal in, in United States.
And then switching gears maybe a little bit here. I mean, I think everyone's well aware of all the infrastructure spending. When do you think some of the that spending will translate into new project announcements that that may not yet be known by the market or and those sorts of things.
Are you speaking about United States or Canada?
Canada specifically.
I think, we have a fair knowledge of what it's coming. It means that you you probably remember the when COVID emerged, there was a lot of talk about shovel ready projects. And in infrastructure, this doesn't work like this. It means that you you cannot on Friday decide that you're going to begin to build an infrastructure job on Monday. This doesn't work.
You have a lot of preparation. You have a lot of environmental assessment, right of way, permits, utility relocation. And so we have quite a good visibility on the specific projects. And we also have visibility on the global envelope from the provincial government, from the CIB, from the federal government. So I would not expect surprises.
I mean, we just have to focus on the right project in front of our strains, find the right partners, the right designers, the the right team, and make it happen.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Your next question comes from the line of Chris Murray with ADP excuse me, ATB Capital
Thank you. Good morning.
Generally, you've you've talked a little bit about, vaccinations, in your workforce. I'm just I guess a couple of parts to this question. You know, one, do you have the ability to to kind of track which of your employees at the local level are actually been vaccinated? And I guess the other thing, you know, what's your expectation as we as we go later into the year? Do you do you foresee there'll be certain jobs where there'll be restrictions that everyone on the site might have to be vaccinated in order
to be able to do the work?
Okay. I mean, just to smile at the beginning, I've been vaccinated because of my age. I'm between 59 and 60 within the last days, and I'm very happy about it. Now, no, we don't know, and we cannot force our guys to be vaccinated evidently. What we can is just it's not only about education, but it's about communication.
It's about promoting and just explaining through our internal channels, the benefits of being, of being vaccinated. And and then, I mean, obviously, for our activities, I mean, the quicker, the better.
Alright. But and then I guess the other part of the question is, I know certainly the the health regulations keep changing, but, you know, you start thinking about things where where folks will be working maybe in remote areas and have to be working out of camps and things like that. Do you foresee any anything that might mandate that anyone working on those sites would have to be vaccinated?
So far, no. But for example, on-site c, the authorities of BC just provided with quite a number of vaccine and have begun some vaccination campaigns. Site C is a campsite. So this is a trend at the moment and we shall see, I think, within the next week what is the evolution and how ACON can participate as proactively as it can depending on on laws and regulation to this movement.
Alright. Alright. I'll leave it there.
Thank you very much.
Okay. Your final question comes from the line of Najee Baydoun with Industry Alliance.
Hi. Good morning. Good I just wanted to get your thoughts on a couple of ESG related priorities. First off, can you talk about any long term opportunities you see from additional construction work on, you know, new decarbonization initiatives? Just wondering how you're thinking about your approach and positioning to capitalize on on new opportunities, infrastructure related, you know, on new lower zero emission projects in Canada.
Evidently,
is a trend and and I would say sort of supplementary pipelines that we just begin to see emerging about all those jobs, especially in energy. I mean, battery storage, for example. But but also, I mean, geothermal is is is rising. District heating is is rising. That shows the difference of temperature between some preaptic level of water or lake lake water and the the atmosphere.
There's quite a number of very interesting and technical projects. What is also interesting is that there's a big chunk of them that go through private initiative within the public areas and we like it. There may be some concession schemes. There may be public private partnership. And it's very important for us.
We have a team only dedicated to track and assess all those new project coming.
And and do you think, that team, is sort of where you want it to be, or do you think you need to make more investments either in, in capabilities or people to be able to to sort of best position yourself, to capitalize on those opportunities?
We will have to recruit in addition to what we have at the moment. We have a dedicated team at the moment, but as I was saying, I mean, twenty minutes ago, the wave And I think it's not going to be stopped. So we have to be ready and we are extremely proactive. You have seen, I mean, with our second sustainability report about our disclosure, about our commitment.
So we have to stay at the forefront of the construction industry in Canada. And most probably we will add more capacity to be there.
Okay. Yeah. That's that's good to hear. Thank you. And just a follow-up to that, to to your, to your last point, the need the second sustainability report, very clear new environmental targets, clearly helps elevate your age profile versus your competitors in the construction sector.
Just wondering if you have any thoughts on additional targets that you're thinking about either on the environmental side or maybe on the social or governance side.
I don't know what I can do better than a zero net in 2050 and 2050 far. What it shows that we are totally focused today on 2030 and trying to make the good decision to be able to to go there. So I think we have set up our targets now. And and and from this, I mean, we are relentlessly working to make it happen.
Okay. Appreciate that. Thank you.
There are no other questions at this time.
Thank you very much, everyone. As always, if there's any follow-up questions, feel free to reach out, and we wish you a good rest of your day. Stay safe, and we'll speak to you on the next call. Take care.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.