Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Ballard Power Systems Q4 and full year 2021 results conference call. As a reminder, all participants are in a listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing star and zero. I would now like to turn the conference over to Kate Charlton, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you operator, and good morning. Welcome to Ballard's fourth quarter 2021 financial and operating results conference call. With us on today's call are Randy MacEwen, Ballard's CEO, and Paul Dobson, Chief Financial Officer. We will be making forward-looking statements that are based on management's current expectations, beliefs, and assumptions concerning future events. Actual results could be materially different. Please refer to our most recent annual information form and other public filings for a complete disclaimer and related information. Given the growing number of research analysts covering the company, we will again keep our prepared remarks relatively brief to leave sufficient time for questions. I'll now turn the call over to Randy.
Thanks, Kate, and welcome everyone to today's conference call. These are extraordinary times. As we look back on 2021, the existential threat posed by our global climate crisis was building to decarbonize our global economy. With this backdrop, there were important developments for the hydrogen sector, including global policy initiatives, increasing net zero targets, deeper pools of capital moving to the energy transition and hydrogen and unprecedented market engagement. Now, amidst the atrocities of the war in Ukraine, the geopolitics of energy have profoundly and irreversibly shifted. The prioritization deck has been reshuffled. Both energy security and decarbonization have jointly galvanized a global worldview that we must accelerate the clean energy transition. Notably, last week, the European Commission released a plan to accelerate the development of secure and sustainable energy with a focus on cutting dependence on Russian gas before 2030.
Within this plan is a specific initiative to create a hydrogen accelerator to develop additional infrastructure and significantly increase clean hydrogen production and importation plans. An increase in clean hydrogen development directly impacts the cost competitiveness and TCO breakeven thresholds for hydrogen fuel cell applications, particularly in a world of rising hydrocarbon fuel costs. We see a strong foundation supporting the global energy transition, and at Ballard, we too continue to lay the foundation to be the long-term market leader in PEM fuel cells. Before we talk about 2022 expectations and outlook, I'd like to take you through some of Ballard's current focus areas and 2021 highlights. Our focus continues to be on the medium and heavy-duty motive mobility markets of bus, truck, rail, and marine, with product leverage in select stationary power market segments.
The total addressable market for these verticals in our medium and heavy-duty motive markets continues to grow with the evolution towards a net zero world. In our 2020 Investor Day, we outlined a 2030 estimated TAM of $130 billion for the bus, truck, rail, and marine markets. Based on current estimates, we now estimate this to be over $250 billion. This does not include the rapidly growing opportunities in the stationary and backup power, light duty, and off-road markets. We expect these additional markets to account for a meaningful proportion of our near and long-term revenue growth. We plan to provide TAM estimates on these additional verticals at our Investor and Analyst Day this fall. I'd like to walk through each of these key verticals and the 2021 highlights.
Throughout the year, we grew our European and U.S. bus business significantly. This growth was supported by repeat orders from key customers, including New Flyer, Solaris, and Wrightbus, as well as entrants in the new regional bus markets with Tata in India and Global Bus Ventures in New Zealand. In the truck market, we executed against our development programs with MAHLE and our Weichai Ballard joint venture programs, while also announcing new collaborations with Hexagon Purus, Linamar, and Quantron. Regarding the progress with MAHLE, we delivered the 120-kilowatt fuel cell engine to the MAHLE team in December on time with the development schedule. This concept engine will now be integrated with their components for the next phase of testing.
The parallel go-to-market strategies of partnering with tier one suppliers and vehicle integrators not only enables us to span various classes of trucks, but also addresses different market demands in stages of maturity. The tier one suppliers act as long-term channel to global truck OEMs, while the vehicle integrators accelerate nearer term demand of fuel cell trucks by bringing early stage fleets to market. You can expect us to continue to address the truck market with this strategy through 2022 and beyond. We expanded our opportunity set in rail, signing new projects with CP Rail, Sierra Northern Railway, and Talgo, while transitioning our Siemens development program to initial product sales for train development in Germany. In the marine vertical, we delivered our first FCwave modules to customers in a number of exciting marine applications, including Norled's hydrogen ferry program.
In stationary and backup power, we increased our revenue and announced an important new partnership with Caterpillar and Microsoft for the data center market, while HDF announced the start of its multi-megawatt baseload hydrogen power plant, deploying Ballard large format fuel cells. On the technology and operational front, we exceeded our internal 2021 goals for our 3x3 stack cost reduction plan and are on track to achieve our 2024 target. We also launched our FCmove-HD+ fuel cell engine and achieved a field experience milestone with vehicles powered by Ballard fuel cell technology, aggregating an industry-leading 100 million kilometers of on-road service. In corporate development, the strategic equity investment in Forsee Power and the acquisition of Arcola Energy are two examples of how we're thinking of expanding across the value chain and increasing our technical capabilities.
With the acquisition of Arcola Energy, now named Ballard Motive Solutions, we have in-house fuel cell powertrain and vehicle integration capabilities, allowing us to reduce customer adoption friction points while strategically expanding across our value chain opportunities. We ended the year with a strong balance sheet and cash position to further deploy as accretive and strategic opportunities arise. Now looking at our key regions. As we highlighted on our Q3 call, we continue to see significant growth in the European market. Our 2021 European revenue increased nearly 20% year over year. In the power product segment specifically, we saw an increase of over 50% in fuel cell sales. This is highlighting the continued maturity of the European bus market and the growth in other fuel cell applications of truck, rail, marine, stationary, and power.
In North America, orders from Cat, CP Rail, and continued follow-on orders from New Flyer are driving the over 300% year-over-year growth in the heavy-duty motive revenue in the U.S. and Canada. Moving to China. Our strategy in addressing the China market remains on track, and we assess the best routes to market as additional clarity around subsidy frameworks becomes available. In mid-January, a second batch of demonstration city clusters was announced. In addition to the first batch of three clusters, Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong. The two new clusters of Hebei and Henan are exciting expansions of the China fuel cell policy. The Henan cluster is led by Zhengzhou City, where the Weichai-Ballard joint venture bus customer, Yutong, is located and consists of 17 participating cities. One of the cities included is Weifang City, where the Weichai-Ballard joint venture is located.
The Henan cluster hasn't released any numbers on fuel cell electric vehicles or hydrogen refueling station deployments as yet, but the industrial experts forecast more than 5,000 fuel cell electric vehicles to be deployed in the Henan cluster during the demonstration period. While details around the subsidies framework have not yet been published, we expect the fuel cell products from the Weichai Ballard joint venture to qualify for the subsidy program at this time. We continue to evaluate opportunities for Ballard and the Weichai Ballard joint venture to further strengthen our positioning across the cluster regions in the near term and post-subsidy adoption in the longer term. Now shifting to the 2022 outlook. Supply chain challenges have been globally ubiquitous throughout 2021 and are continuing into 2022.
To date, we've been largely able to risk mitigate global supply chain disruptions by increasing supply of materials and moving more inbound products by air. In 2022, we're anticipating some electronic component supply constraints, but we continue to identify alternatives and sign agreements to secure supply continuity. Regarding the increasingly dire situation in Ukraine, we have no direct vendors from either Russia or Ukraine and have not received any identified impacts from discussions with suppliers so far. We do have a number of suppliers in Europe and neighboring Ukraine, so we are tracking open orders and trying to expedite deliveries where possible to avoid material shortages. More broadly on commodities and component pricing pressure, 40% of Europe's natural gas and 25% of Europe's crude oil is provided by Russia.
Pricing pressure is expected on components globally as energy costs for production and transport continue to rise as the conflict continues. To date, we have not received any price increase notifications from our suppliers. We are honoring pricing on our existing customer contracts, but have already taken action to adjust commercial quoting activities for future orders to reflect the current cost and risk environment. We've initiated 2022 guidance on total operating costs and capital expenditures to provide clarity on our capital allocation plans and priorities. Our total operating costs for this year are expected to be between $140 million and $160 million, a 50% increase from 2021.
This increase is largely driven by increasing our investment in technology and product development related to next generation products and component development across our key target markets of bus, truck, rail and marine, as well as increased investments in sales and marketing. These resources are working to develop additional product capabilities aimed at key growth markets such as bus, truck, rail and marine, and next generation fuel cell technologies. We're confident investing ahead of the curve, and we believe this is critical to maintain technology leadership and market share as the hydrogen growth accelerates over the coming years. Our 2022 capital expenditures are expected to be between $40 million and $60 million. This estimate excludes potential investments in corporate development activities. We are increasing capital investments on our testing capabilities, adding production lab and engineering equipment, and investing in additional prototyping functionality.
Following our investments over the past three years on advanced manufacturing of MEAs, we're now starting investments in advanced manufacturing of bipolar plates. We are expecting additional pressure on our gross margin outlook for 2022 consistent across the industry. Key drivers are continued increase in material pricing, freight and cost and labor, as well as an ongoing shift in the revenue mix to additional power products versus technology solutions. We are still in the early phase of adoption and production volumes and platform acquisitions, customer acquisitions, and therefore the cost of fuel cells are still sub-optimized, putting pressure on gross margin. As the industry grows and production volumes scale, we expect to see concurrent gross margin expansion.
Corporate development work will continue to be a strategic priority in 2022, including potential acquisitions, investments and partnerships to improve competitive positioning, expand our product portfolio and solutions across the value chain, simplifying and enhancing customer experience, accelerating fuel cell adoption in target markets, and accelerating business scaling. As the energy transition and pace of decarbonization accelerates globally, we're also focused on reducing our own emissions. In 2019, we launched our Mission Carbon Zero initiative to evaluate and steadily reduce the environmental impact of our organization. In 2022, we plan to complete our roadmap to achieving this corporate Carbon Zero goal by 2030 through defining long-term strategies to reduce and offset our emissions and other impacts. On the last earnings call, we discussed the significant leverage, diversification, and resiliency in our business model across multiple regions and multiple verticals.
We are already seeing early signs of this strategy and the benefit play out. While our backlog was down from Q3, this top line number does not tell the whole story and masks key growth signals from underneath. This diversification in our revenue mix by region, vertical, and customer is critical as we establish a presence with an increasing number of leading companies in our target markets of truck, rail, marine, and stationary power, and continue to build on our bus market. Our 2020 year-end order backlog was made up of 20 customers with meaningful orders, excluding the Weichai-Ballard joint venture. At the year-end 2021, just one year later, this number grew over 50% to over 30 customers with meaningful orders.
We also saw growth in European and North American composition in the order book, now comprising approximately 60% of the total backlog, in contrast to approximately 40% at the end of 2020. As we have seen the translation of growth with companies like Wrightbus, Van Hool, Solaris and New Flyer, we expect a similar growth profile for new customers making up increasing proportions of our future order book. With this resilient and diversified business model, growing technology capabilities by investing ahead of the hydrogen growth curve and increasing partnerships in key verticals and regions, we're excited about the 2022 outlook and long-term positioning for Ballard. This year and the years to come, we will continue to set the stage and lay the foundation for years of growth ahead as the energy transition takes hold.
With that, we'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To join the question queue, you may press Star then one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press Star then two. We ask that all questioners please keep to asking one question and one follow-up. We will pause for a moment as callers join the queue. The first question comes from Michael Glen with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning. Randy, maybe just to start, you spoke a bit about Motive, but can you just give some indication what are next steps there? Do you think you're going to look at putting a facility to assemble the modules in Europe or should we think about maybe a commercial partnership with an OEM in Europe? Just trying to gauge what we might see on that particular partnership.
Great. Thanks for the question, Michael, and good morning. Yeah, so just for the audience, of course, here, MAHLE and Ballard are jointly developing a fuel cell engine platform for the commercial truck market for Europe. This is a multi-year development program. We made, I think, very significant technical progress on designing and developing a 240-kW fuel cell electric powertrain last year. That's two 120 kW for a total of 240. Our responsibility at Ballard in terms of our scope of work is designing the fuel cell stack as well as the system design. MAHLE last year and this year will be working on significant development of key balance of plant components as well as thermal management and power electronics for the complete fuel cell system and powertrain integration.
As we kinda look at 2022, I think one of the important things we should highlight is that MAHLE has just seen a new CEO join in January. We actually have a call with that CEO next week. That will be important for us to start the development of our relationship with the new CEO at MAHLE. Long term, what we see is a market opportunity for MAHLE and Ballard to be co-developing fuel cell engines for the commercial truck market. I think they'll be leading fuel cell engines with components that have reliability and cost, and supply chain muscle from the MAHLE organization.
In terms of whether that's a joint venture and you know joint manufacturing capabilities, I think we you know we're still fairly early with the new CEO, so we'll wait to comment on that. Similarly on the commercial side, a lot of important work to continue technical work in 2022, so we really do see 2023 and beyond as markets where we're gonna see more commercial engagement. It's really about designing the product with the right components, the right cost structure for the long term last year and this year.
Okay. My follow-up on that is when do you think we would actually see the entire unit in a truck driving on the road?
Yeah. In terms of, you know, public deployment of that, I think 2023 would be a realistic timetable for that to happen. Certainly, you know, there are activities in 2020 that will be internal at Ballard and MAHLE. You can think about that fuel cell engine actually tested in a real powertrain, in a real vehicle in 2022, but not publicly with third parties.
Okay. Thanks for taking the questions.
Yep. Thank you, Michael.
The next question comes from MacMurray Whale with Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning. Randy, given the CapEx and OpEx increase, I'm wondering if you could give us an idea of the nature of those investments. For instance, is it essentially just creating like a bigger headcount doing the same, or are you really broadening efforts into areas that we may not yet comprehend? I'm wondering whether you can give us more insight into how you sort of allocate that.
Sure. Good morning, Mac, and thanks for the question. I think it's important to understand kinda where we are. We have very attractive partners in each of our verticals now, bus, truck, rail, and marine, off road, stationary, blue chip partners, blue chip programs, demonstration programs underway. Where we are also in the development of our own technology and products, we're really maturing in some cases from concept level to prototype, et cetera. As you get deeper into these product development programs, the investments get heavier. We have a number of programs and that will be you know, effectively investing in both at the stack and module level.
Stack and module programs, we're trying to focus on core products where we can rationalize market and product requirements from all these different verticals and the different geographics by core fuel cell technology, you know, MEAs, bipolar plates, stacks obviously, and modules, including the module architecture. I think it's important that you know the testing and design validation, as I said, as you get into the maturing from prototype and even beyond into series, it's just a deeper investment. I think those are important. We've also had, I think about 80% increase in research in 2022, and that's you know continue our investment in core MEA components, catalyst, GDL membrane, as well as pretty significant investment in balance of plant components.
HRB, air compressor, DC converters with partners in these cases, but it does require investment at Ballard as well. On the CapEx front, pretty significant investment coming in our testing capability, so about 22 new test stations and some 48 test stations that are going through upgrades in 2022, so it's a fairly significant investment year on the testing capability side. We have very significant investment on the production equipment, both for next generation plate pilot line project that we're working on, as I mentioned earlier, as well as continued manufacturing process improvements across MEAs and modules as well. Significant investment on the CapEx side for lab and engineering equipment, you know, upgrades on our facilities and tooling and fixtures.
On the tooling and fixtures side, you know, pretty significant investment for balance of plant component cost reduction and some of the tooling we need, also for our new unit cell designs, at the stack level, so at the unit cell level. Pretty significant investment overall. You know, we're making that investment because all of these different markets that we're involved in, again, we are, I think, going through this process where we're transitioning from customer acquisition, from platform wins to long-term supply agreements, and we're readying, with a lot of customer interest, on understanding how we're scaling to support their expected growth.
Okay. Just as a follow-up then, you talked about the TAM increasing from $130-$250. Because of these investments, is there a link to that? Like, can we draw a line between that, and would your piece of market share of that with the pie, your portion of the pie also be going up because of these investments? Like, what's your thought on that?
Yeah, I don't think the increase in the TAM is really driving this investment in 2022. Although I will say, in my opinion, rail and marine, you know, I'd mentioned this a few years ago, I thought they would surprise to the upside. That's what's happening, in my opinion, on rail and marine with the engagement we're seeing there for different customers. What I also see too on the bus side, I think there's been a lot of debate over the last few years about battery electric versus fuel cell electric, and we're seeing a number of transit operators who've trialed both technologies now saying increasingly, "We're gonna be moving to deployment of fuel cell buses rather than battery electric buses." Let me just give you two examples in North America.
For example, in North America, AC Transit previously thought they would have 70% battery electric and 30% fuel cell electric, and now we see that actually being flipped, where they're forecasting now that 70% of their buses will be fuel cell buses. You know, another one, we see another California transit operator going 100% fuel cell buses. We're starting to see, in my opinion, the bus market opportunity thicken up. You know, I do think we're gonna start to see orders beyond the tens and twenties into hundreds and multiple hundreds, particularly in the European markets. We're getting very excited about the bus market there.
I think it's just a collection of all these different customer engagement programs that we have, where the customers really wanna see that as they scale to series and volume deployments, that we have the right infrastructure, the right quality processes, the right manufacturing capacity to be their trusted partner. I think they're all there on the technology, and it's now about making sure we validate the manufacturing side, and we're making investments in both.
Thanks, Randy.
Thanks, Mac.
The next question comes from Rupert Merer with National Bank. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning, everyone. Randy, you talked about the crisis in Europe and the plans to accelerate hydrogen infrastructure there. Are you involved in any discussions to accelerate plans in Europe or is it too early?
Yeah. Rupert, good morning, and thanks for the question. It is, of course, very early, but this REPowerEU plan for affordable, secure, and sustainable energy, you know, I think is just the start. We expect to see similar type of initiatives in other countries where energy security is top of mind. You know, it's a program that's really focused on accelerating adoption of low cost renewable power, but also looking at this hydrogen accelerator program. I think what we're gonna see is fairly significant scale-up in terms of green hydrogen supply in Europe, a 4x acceleration compared to what was previously contemplated. I think that's important. Of course, that green hydrogen is gonna be used for a variety of opportunities to decarbonize energy industry and mobility.
Particularly on the mobility ones, we feel we are very well-positioned in each of the vertical markets where you'd expect to see green hydrogen uptake in mobility applications. Bus, truck, rail, and marine in Europe, we feel strongly positioned in.
It is early, but is there any discussion on timeline for starting to ramp up activities and availability of subsidies or mandates to accelerate hydrogen?
Yeah. I think this REPowerEU, if you think about it on the heels of a Fit for 55, just overall, this acceleration from a energy transition perspective, now energy security, I think will lead to, you know, increased order uptake in the 2023 timeframe. I think it's gonna take some time for that to translate into programs and policies. As a reminder, of course, all of these market applications we're in, bus, truck, rail, and marine, these markets do have long lead times in terms of customers getting, in some cases, financing opportunities, support. Of course, going through a program where they put out to tender their bids for, you know, whether it's bus or truck, et cetera.
It'll take time for that to translate to orders, but we're very confident about the positioning we have in these key markets.
Great. Thank you. I'll leave it there.
Yep. Rupert, one thing I'd add too is that I do think we're gonna see an acceleration in ports, which has been highlighted as a key area where you can see hydrogen clusters with multiple applications, using that same hydrogen refueling infrastructure, and I think Europe's gonna lead the way.
Great. Thank you.
The next question comes from Aaron MacNeil with TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Hey, morning, all. Thanks for taking my questions. You've referenced 2023 as sort of this kind of growth kickoff year, a few times now. We've got, you know, you mentioned long-term supply agreements as part of the answer to Mac's question. I guess, you know, how are you positioning for this just at a very practical level? Like, should we see you start to build inventory, staffing up? I know you mentioned the testing expansion or, do you feel like you have the capacity to meaningfully grow order flow just based on the staffing and inventory levels you have currently?
Yeah. Thanks for the question, Aaron. That is really part of the reason we're looking at this increased investment, both on the operating cost side and the CapEx side in 2022. Some of that, you know, will translate into 2023 as well. We see the market engagement, we see the customers wanting to have long-term arrangements. We need to get through these pilot projects, we need to demonstrate very clearly not just the technology from a dependability and reliability and performance perspective in the demonstration projects, but show the ability to manufacture at quality in scale at the right cost structure. Our 3x3 cost program, our manufacturing expansion initiatives, our investment in our resourcing, all very important.
I'd highlight we're also increasing the investment in the organization in terms of how we're structured to attack the market opportunities. We have effectively repositioned our organizational structure with a real focus on the different verticals, bus, truck, rail, and marine, and have strong leadership cascading, of course, market requirements, product requirements, into our core product portfolio and global manufacturing capacity as well. A lot of work in 2022 that will support future growth. You know, again, it's all about taking those customers from A to B and ultimately further than that over the next few years and scaling the business.
Critically important that we get to scale as we make these investments, in order to drive down our cost, for our technology and our products and really see gross margin expansion in the future.
Understood. Maybe switching gears a bit. I just wanna understand the Chinese city cluster dynamic a bit better. You mentioned the 5,000 vehicles over the period. I was curious, you know, what is the duration of the demonstration period? Can you qualify for other city clusters, and how might you do that? Then specific to the one that you qualify for, what does the competitive landscape look like in that specific city cluster, and how do you feel in terms of your competitive positioning there?
Yeah, great question. There's a lot of complexity to this that I think still needs to play out. I think given the COVID-19 situation in China right now, I would say this is not the top priority for the Chinese government to clarify this, but it is something that I think needs to get clarified very quickly. Because how you operate in one cluster and even the point scheme within that cluster and the value chain participation and how that translates to another cluster still some ambiguity there. There's work that's being done with the government and industry in parallel, working together to make sure that there's a transparency, so that when capital supports a deployment of vehicles it has clarity on how that return is gonna play out.
I will highlight though, when you look at the five clusters, some of them have announced fairly significant opportunities for vehicles. You've got, you know, Beijing that's looking at 5,000 fuel cell electric vehicles, Shanghai, another 5,000, Guangdong, 10,000, and then as we mentioned, Henan, 5,000, Hebei at 8,000. You just look at these aggregate deployments over the next number of years, what we see is a scaling occurring, particularly in the 2025 timeframe, as initial 2025 requirements to kind of track to the 2030 goals of 1 million fuel cell electric vehicles on road. We also see a fairly significant build-out of hydrogen refueling stations.
In 2021, you know, even absent strong adoption of fuel cell vehicles in 2021, there was another 100 fueling stations built out. It's about over 180 today, and I think another 50+ under construction. I think we're gonna see, you know, over 230 hydrogen fueling stations by the end of 2022, supporting. Again, these are focused on bus and truck opportunities. These aren't for passenger car fueling stations. I think it's gonna take some time to have clarity how these translate. Within the specific cluster here, where Weifang is located, we do see a very strong position for the Weichai-Ballard JV joint venture.
You know, if you look at the companies that are included in that cluster, if you look at plate manufacturing, stack manufacturing, module assembly, the JV is the largest company in those parts of the value chain in that cluster.
Okay, great. Thanks. I'll turn it over.
Great. Thank you.
The next question comes from Jonathan Lamers with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Good morning. On the backlog, is this becoming less of a relevant indicator for revenue over the next 12 months as Ballard transitions to more of a manufacturing business from a consulting business?
Just the second part to that question, if I can. For the Weichai-Ballard JV, how far ahead of production do you expect the lead times for the next round of MEA and plate orders to be?
Hey, Jonathan, it's Paul here. I'll take the first question on the backlog on the order book. We did see the twelve-month and total order book decrease about 15% from Q3 2021, from the last quarter. What's interesting when you look at the inside the order book, you see the European and North American composition growing, where in Europe and North America is now 65% of the twelve-month order book. You know, in the total order book, it's about 60% versus 40% from last year. The balance is, you know, you can see the movement from China to Europe and North America. We also see increasing developing markets, including marine, stationary, and off-road increasing as well.
Another dynamic I'd highlight too is the increased customer diversification. In Q4, we had over 30 customers who had material orders over $250,000 compared to about 20 in Q4 2020, a year ago. That's a pretty good increase in customer diversification overall. As you mentioned, we did see the decline continue to decline as we've signaled before the wind-down in TS as the Audi contract winds down, and we also continue to fulfill the $90 million Weichai technology transfer agreement. We expect to see you know that kind of those trends continue with the Technology Solutions leveling out.
As we look forward, you know, we're very confident in the long-term prospects, still remain confident, as Randy mentioned in his remarks, about the adoption of fuel cells, hydrogen fuel cells for mobility and stationary power in particular. We do expect there could be some volatility in orders in the near term, especially when you consider the inflationary environment and the geopolitical risks that we're in. We have, you know, we would point to the quality of the large customers, all the customers we have, but particularly large customers and the work we're doing with them, Siemens, MAHLE, Caterpillar, for example, to develop these products. As Randy mentioned, it takes time to develop and thoroughly test.
One thing I've learned over the past year now, the amount of time it takes to really make sure the product is well understood and tested before we can get to scale production and volumes. We expect to see when we get to that point, ever-increasing orders and revenue flow. We do have good growth in the bus market and expect to see you know, the other markets, truck, rail, marine, stationary to follow a similar path as they continue to develop and ramp up. One of the proof points we point to too is again around the quality of our growing customer base, and just look at you know, for example, the Adani Group, which we mentioned.
You know, commercializing fuel cells in in various mobility and industrial applications in India, which was, you know, not a market we were looking at, you know, 12, 18 months ago, but there's certainly big signals that it is going to be, you know, a very large hydrogen market. It's a great new partner in a new geography. To sum up, yes, there's gonna be some potential volatility in revenues and orders in the near term, but we are very bullish on the long-term prospects.
Jonathan, maybe just to follow up on your question on the MEA supply to the joint venture. You know, there is no material MEA supply in the order book. You know, I think we just saw this latest two cluster regions announced just a number of weeks ago, so it's still very early to see how that's gonna play out. I think we'll have more visibility on the next MEA order from the JV to Ballard later this year.
Okay, thanks. Just one follow-up, if I can. Like, quite a step up in sales by the JV in Q4. You know, looking at the industry data, it looks like the semi-tractor production in China really stepped up in Q4. Was some of that sort of, like, lumpy one-time orders ahead of the Olympics or, you know, can you just kind of give us any color on what happened in Q4 and sort of what cadence you would expect over the coming year, if you can?
Yeah, I don't think we're gonna see kind of a smooth pattern of order flow out of China or really any market in the very near term. It is very much a project-based business with lumpiness per quarter. I don't think we could translate Q4 to what that will mean for the coming quarters in China. I think we'll have to wait and see how the policies unfold. I do think overall in the China market, you are right. There was a tick up in Q4 ahead of the Olympics. We didn't have a significant presence at the Olympics. Most of these were Beijing-based companies that were providing primarily fuel cell buses.
There was a Weichai truck at the Olympics with a Weichai-Ballard JV engine that was actually doing waxing of snowboards and skis. It was a pretty interesting truck, heavily visited at the Olympics. This didn't relate to the Olympics. This is more about the Shandong market opportunities.
Thanks for your comments.
Great. Thank you.
The next question comes from Rob Brown with Lake Street Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Randy, just wanted to get some more detail on the marine market. You had a nice order here recently. How is that market developing? Do you see that still in pilot orders or are you seeing sort of a broader thinking on deployments there?
Morning, Rob, and thanks for the question. You know, marine is one of those markets where we've seen the total addressable market increase significantly from our early initiatives or review. You know, it's a $40 billion TAM we now see for marine. We have recently announced with ABB their approval in principle and working towards what we call type approval, which would give our fuel cell module for marine, we call it FCwave, a global first milestone for type approval. Again, in the marine segment, we're initially focused on what I'll call some of the workboats, so ferries, cargos, tugboats, workboats, riverboats, et cetera. Some of these market segments and initially we see it very focused on or concentrated on the European market.
One of the partnerships I do wanna highlight, I mentioned in the prepared remarks, was Norled, which is one of Norway's largest ferry and express boat operators. I think they own around 80 vessels currently in operation. Actually, there are 2 or 3 videos on YouTube of the, what's called the Hydra. Hydra, this is the first fuel cell ferry. Some very cool videos on YouTube that Norled has posted with this Hydra boat. You know, they, Norway in particular, has the world's highest concentration of fjords, and there's a very strong support there for these environmentally sensitive waterways to be protected. You know, Norled is launching this world's first liquid hydrogen-powered ferry, which I think is an important development.
The vessel itself, I think it's around 83 meters long, about capacity for up to 300 passengers and 80 cars. It travels around 17 km/h. We've now supplied two 200 kW FCwave modules, so that's 400 kW of power that will help that vessel on propulsive power. The liquid hydrogen is being supplied by Linde in a production facility with a 24 MW PEM electrolyzer. There's a lot of pieces that have been put in place to support the world's first, you know, fuel cell ferry, and we're pretty excited about this opportunity. I think, you know, in later 2022, if people are in Norway, they'll have the opportunity to sail on this ferry on its route.
You know, when you see these type of market opportunities where carbon emissions are being reduced by 95% for that type of application, it's pretty compelling. ABB is another important partner for us in the marine market. I just had an opportunity to meet with them at the CERAWeek conference last week in Houston, and you know, continue to explore collaboration opportunities with ABB. This is a market that I think we're very well positioned for with our Marine Center of Excellence in Denmark, very close to these markets.
Great. Thank you for that overview. I'll turn it over.
Thank you.
The next question comes from P.J. Juvekar with Citi. Please go ahead.
Yes. Hi, good morning. You know, you gave some encouraging numbers about bus targets in different cities in China. How many FC modules did the Weichai-Ballard JV joint venture actually sell in 2021? And then how do you see that ramp up in 2022 and beyond as your production and testing capabilities improve?
Yeah. In terms of deployments in the China market, I would say it was fairly muted deployment activity overall in the China market in 2021. Particularly on the bus market side, very limited numbers from the JV in 2021. You asked about the ability to, you know, look at a ramp up there. We've invested a lot with Weichai over the last few years on the development of that joint venture. We have, I think, the world's largest manufacturer of bipolar plates and assembly of stacks and assembly of modules for these target markets of bus and truck, with about, you know, production capacity, annual production capacity of over 34,000 stacks to support 20,000 fuel cell engines. Think about that as 20,000 buses and/or trucks.
I do think in the long term, we will see a heavier weighting in the China market on trucks. It's gonna be a lot of fuel cell buses for sure, but we do see a heavier weighting likely on the truck side. Those are two markets that the joint venture is actively working on. I think it's important to understand that within the Weichai Group as well, they have two bus OEMs, Zhongtong Bus and Asiastar Bus, who have both, you know, incorporated the fuel cell modules from the Weichai Ballard joint venture into platforms, have now tested, and run them in real life circumstances with real passengers, you know, over the last year.
I think somewhere around 150 buses that we've got good traction against with those two bus OEMs within the Weichai Group. And then additional customers outside, bus customers outside the Weichai Group, including Yutong, the world's largest manufacturer of buses, and as I mentioned earlier, strategically located in Zhengzhou. We're very excited about the long-term bus market opportunity in China. On the truck side, as a reminder, within the Weichai Group, they own, you know, one of the largest truck OEMs in China, Sinotruk, number two or number three, depending on which metrics you look at. They have incorporated a number of fuel cell platforms into different classes of trucks at Sinotruk.
As an example, last June, I was in China, attending the FCVC conference, where we had, I think, four different buses and trucks at that conference, with Weichai Ballard joint venture modules powering those vehicles. Still early in terms of market adoption given the policy uncertainty, but very well positioned to support the scaling to occur in the coming years.
Great. Then you have this MOU with Adani in India. What's the scope of that project? When you combine that with your Tata bus deal, how big the India market could be for you and sort of what time frame? Thank you.
Yeah, P.J., we're very excited about the recent developments in India. You think about, you know, not just the green hydrogen policy they announced, but really a push on renewables there and really a focus on not just addressing climate change and air quality, but now energy security and economic development. In February, India did announce this green hydrogen policy focusing on encouraging really either the purchase or build out of renewable capacity specifically for green hydrogen production. The policy provides open access approval, I think this is really important, within 15 days without central surcharge and zero interstate transmission charge for 25 years. There's some very strong incentives to certainly before June 2025, to get green hydrogen production online and benefit from these subsidy supports.
I think on top of that, what we're seeing is a very compelling partner with Adani. When you think about the different attachment points they have across the Adani business with port trucks and airport buses and rail opportunities and off-road vehicles, including mining, power generation of ports, it's a very exciting company, and we're looking as we've identified in the press release with Adani, the opportunity to manufacture fuel cells for these market applications in the Indian market. We see Adani as a compelling long-term partner. I wanna highlight this is coming directly from Gautam Adani, the founder and chairman, CEO, of Adani Group. We've had the opportunity to meet with him in person and get his vision for a movement and an energy transition in India.
I think it's very compelling what Adani Group is trying to accomplish as the number one renewable player in India and now looking at how do they translate that to green hydrogen and the applications that have attachment points across their industrial, diversified business.
Thank you.
The next question comes from Leo Mariani with KeyBank. Please go ahead.
Hey, guys. I was hoping you could talk a little bit more about gross margins. I think in your prepared comments, you did talk about continuing to see some margin pressure in 2022. However, it looks like your margins were up a little bit here in the fourth quarter to kind of around, you know, 13%. Maybe you could just provide a little bit more color on perhaps what we should expect in terms of gross margins as 2022 evolves.
Sure. Hey, buddy. It's Paul here. Yeah, we did see margins increase from Q3 into Q4 by a couple points. But when you look year-over-year, we saw a decrease in gross margin by about seven points. The largest contributor to that is along the same lines what we've been talking about already, the shift from technology services, which traditionally has had a much larger contribution margin to power products, which has a smaller contribution margin. That mix counts for about 5 points of the gross margin decline.
We also saw had some pressure on material costs and freight, which each were about 1%, as well as an incremental warranty provision of about 1%, which was offset by some subsidies for COVID from the Canadian government by 1%. About 7% overall. As we go forward into 2022, that shift in mix in favor of power products we expect to continue, and that's going to put some pressure on gross margins. We also had talked earlier about the volatility, inflationary environment we're in and the volatility and cost. When we talk to our suppliers, whether it's energy costs or commodities, metals, those are all going to filter through into costs that ultimately will come our way as well.
We do expect that trend, as well as shipping, I should mention too. Shipping costs have increased year on year, and we expect that to continue. We do see that downward pressure continuing somewhat, as we go into 2022. We do also expect, though, that, you know, as volumes ramp up, we'll be able to amortize our increasing costs.
Scale over, you know, over higher volumes, and that will have an increasing effect on gross margins as we go forward into 2023 and beyond. Expect, you know, the downward trend in 2022, but see some expansion as we get volumes ramping up.
Okay. No, that's helpful for sure. I guess just wanted to kind of circle back a little bit on the Weichai, you know, JV there in China. If I kind of heard y'all right, in terms of some of the comments that you made, it sounded like we really shouldn't expect much in the way of revenue from that in 2022, at least certainly not in the beginning of 2022, and I know there's some policy initiatives that still need to be, you know, cleared up. Is that a reasonable way to think about it?
Yeah, Leo, I think the situation just doesn't have the clarity at this time that enables us to have a confident posture on it. I think we're gonna have to wait and be patient, and as circumstances, policy, market demand and market demand that understands the policy landscape and is confident in committing capital, as that gets more clarity, that will trickle to the Weichai-Ballard JV joint venture orders, which will then trickle to Ballard for orders. At this time, we just don't have the clarity and visibility to give us that confidence level.
Okay. Thanks, everyone.
Thank you.
Once again, if you have a question, please press star then one. The next question comes from Craig Shere with Tuohy Brothers. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. First, you have quite a, you know, strong balance sheet and dry powder. Given the growing organic OpEx and CapEx investment, as well as near-term pressure on gross margins, do you wanna, you know, stay on the safer side as far as liquidity? Do you have some upper limit on what you're willing to consider for M&A?
Yeah. I mean, we do have some dry powder, as you say, and, you know, looking to deploy that, both organically and inorganically. Randy talked a lot about the increase in CapEx and OpEx that we've had this year, as well as going into next year. In our strategic plan, you know, we look out five years, at least five years, and have a capital allocation plan that we're satisfied with that, you know, we can get to where we need to be, within that timeframe. We could though, look to raise more capital if market conditions warranted, and we had a larger M&A transaction.
You know, of course, with the balance sheet size it is, there is an upper limit, but we would look at market conditions at that time and see about raising more capital, perhaps, if conditions were favorable.
Got it. There was a reference to doing better than expected in 2021 on stack cost reductions and moving, you know, well on your way towards the 2024 target. Could you opine about perhaps, you know, achieving that earlier? Could we achieve, you know, mid-decade targets more like 2023? What goes into that?
Yeah. Craig, I don't think we see that happening earlier. There's a number of different elements that are coming together on a sequenced time basis. We're very pleased with the progress in 2021. We need to duplicate that progress now in 2022 and again in 2023. You know, lots of work to do. I think most of the, I'll call it technology risk we've worked through. Now a lot of it is more on the side of vendors that we've transitioned to new materials, and now we've qualified those materials, and we've done them in small samples. It's you know, getting the scale up on the vendor side as well, supplier side.
Also on the advanced manufacturing initiatives, you know, getting the volumes to drive those improvements that we expect to see on costs and therefore gross margins, as well as on the advanced manufacturing side. I think we're on track and we're sticking with that plan, and I don't see a pulling of it.
Very good. As a very quick follow-up to the first question. If you're getting close to commercialization and you think positive cash flows are within a year or two around the corner, is there some point you would consider some leverage instead of just equity all the time?
Yeah. We would look at that. Of course, we would wanna have a you know, steady stream, positive stream coming in, and we would certainly look at perhaps some leverage. That's into the future, not in the near term.
Yeah. Craig, I think as we think about the capital stack, just to follow on Paul's point, you know, we have sufficient capital to get us to where we need to be from a business perspective, a cash flow perspective. What we're talking about is in the event of a larger M&A transaction, particularly if we're not able to use paper for part consideration, that's the type of circumstance where we may need to look at raising capital. As the business mature, of course, in terms of the capital stack, we look at the introduction potentially of green bonds or other debt structures that made sense in the markets at that time.
Great. Thank you.
The next question comes from Jeff Osborne with Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Good morning, Randy, and thanks for all the details on the call in terms of OPEX and CapEx. It's very helpful. Two quick questions on my end. On the tech solutions side for 2022, is that still a headwind from a gross margin perspective? I think you alluded to five points of pressure for 2021. I was just curious how to think about the mix shift in 2022 itself.
Jeff, for tech solutions, the margins did decompress a little bit in 2021 versus 2020 by a couple points. We would see the margins being fairly steady. Maybe we might lose another point or two in 2022, but not beyond that. The mix change really is the sort of relationship, the increasing revenue from power products versus tech solutions. The impact of mix on the blended gross margin is what we're trying to express there.
Got it. Any thoughts, Randy, on electrolyzer applicability to your PEM development? Is that something that you'll be working on this year as part of the increased R&D?
Yeah. Great question, Jeff. We feel like we have a lot on our plate with just the fuel cell applications here and customer requirements and market opportunities. PEM electrolyzers are not something we would do in-house organically at this time.
Got it. Thank you.
Thank you, Jeff.
Thanks so much. Bye.
The next question comes from Greg Wasikowski with Webber Research. Please go ahead.
Hey, Randy. Good morning. Just one for me here to end it. Could you comment a little bit more on component and raw material availability in 2022, kinda where your concerns may be, and then particularly related to your palladium supply chain and whether or not current events in Eastern Europe affect it or to what degree that it could potentially affect it. Thanks.
Yeah. Greg, thanks for the question. If you kinda look at our products, you know, where we do see some exposure is aluminum. Aluminum accounts for, I think about less than 5% of the total module cost. Actually, it's a significant part of our BOM cost as well in our modules, so it's something we're looking to, you know, continue to reduce, the amount of aluminum we have. There's an area where we could see some commodity exposure in 2022. Platinum accounts for, I think about less than 5% likewise, or about 5% of our total module cost as well. That's something that we're tracking obviously and have tracked, you know, our entire life cycle here at Ballard.
We do have multiple suppliers for platinum with sourcing outside of Europe, so that's important. Iridium is another area, but this is, you know, now less than 1% of the module cost. I think relative to some of the other technologies like battery technologies, you know, we do have less exposure to volatility to some of the supply chain inputs and commodity costs. But of course, this, you know, we are gonna see, I think, cost increases across all activities and commodities and of course, energy is gonna impact all companies' operations. I do think we're gonna see pressure, and I think this is just a geopolitical risk that every company, every industry has a challenge with in 2022.
Got it. Thanks, Randy.
This concludes the question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Randy MacEwen, CEO, for any closing remarks.
Thank you for joining us today. Paul, Kate, and I look forward to speaking with you in May when we'll discuss results for Q1 2022. Thanks again.
This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.