Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Chris, and I will be your conference operator today. Welcome to the Fortis 5 Year Capital and Dividend Outlook Conference Call and Webcast. During the call, all participants will be in a listen only mode. There will be a question and answer session following the presentation.
At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Stephanie Amaimo. Please go ahead, Ms. Amaimo.
Thanks, Chris, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to Fortis' 5 year outlook conference call. I'm joined by Barry Perry, President and CEO Jocelyn Perry, Executive Vice President and CFO David Hutchins, COO other members of the senior management team as well as CEOs from certain subsidiaries. Before we begin today's call, I want to remind you that the discussion will include forward looking information, which is subject to the cautionary statement contained in the supporting slideshow. Actual results can differ materially from the forecasted projections included in the forward looking information presented today. Unless otherwise specified, all financial information referenced is in Canadian dollars.
With that, I will turn the call over to Barry.
Thank you, and welcome, everyone. Earlier this morning, the Fortis Board of Directors made public my retirement and announced the appointment of David Hutchins as my successor effective January 1, 2021. I am honored and privileged to have served the company for more than 20 years. To say I'm proud of the success of Fortis would be an understatement. In 1987, in our first ever annual report, our CEO of the time, Angus Bruno said, and I quote, It is our goal as we look forward to the future to ensure that Fortis will become to me strength of tradition, of management, of commitment, of service and of the future.
We continue to stand by these goals today and we have Mr. Bruno, Mr. Stanley Marshall and a host of others to thank for our success. Our team is best in class and I know they will continue to guide our utilities to serve customers well and continue to find opportunities to grow. Thank you to each and every one of you.
I am looking forward to my retirement and I am fully confident that David will provide the leadership necessary to continue executing on the corporation's business plan. David has worked closely with me and our entire team now for 6 years. He is immersed in our culture and is the right choice to lead Fortis into a cleaner energy future for our customers. Thank you, David, for accepting the challenge.
Thank you, Barry. It has been truly an honor to be part of this incredible company under your leadership. During that time, I have come to know and respect Fortis' rich history, culture and people that have made it such a success. While I never knew Mr. Bruno, I can personally attest to the outstanding leadership and character of the other 2 Fortis CEOs, yourself and Mr.
Marshall that built this great company. Barry, your accomplishments at Fortis have been extraordinary. You have more than doubled the size of the company during your tenure, while achieving impressive shareholder returns. You led us through our largest acquisition, ITC, listed Fortis on the New York Stock Exchange and successfully pivoted our company to focus on the organic growth of our utilities. But we aren't only thankful to Barry for his accomplishments and delivering on the numbers.
We are thankful for his true leadership in every sense of the word and for the truly genuine person that he is. You will certainly be missed by all of us at Fortis and by so many of our industry colleagues. As I look forward to taking the helm of Fortis next year, I do not take lightly the level of trust that our board has placed in me and our team to continue Fortis' exemplary track record of success. I am confident that we will continue to steer our leading North American energy delivery business toward an even better future for our employees, customers, shareholders and planet. I will now turn the call back over to Barry to provide the business update.
Thanks, David. Before getting into the details of the business update, I want to thank all our employees who are working hard to provide customers with reliable service during the pandemic. I am so impressed with your commitment to each other and to our customers and communities. It is you that makes Fortis a strong company. I especially want to thank the workers in the field in both our electricity and natural gas businesses.
You have been out there since COVID-nineteen started. We truly appreciate all your efforts. As a low risk energy delivery business, our utilities are positioned to operate well during the good times and the bad times. That is exactly what we are seeing in 2020 across our utilities amidst the pandemic, hurricanes, record snowfalls in Newfoundland and record high temperatures in Arizona, just to name a few. Our capital investment plan of $4,300,000,000 for 2020 remains on track.
As always, the health and safety of our employees and customers remain at the forefront as we deliver essential electricity and natural gas to homes and businesses across North America. On safety, we have improved considerably in 2020. Through August, our safety related incidents are down over 40% compared to our internal 3 year average. And when you consider that historically, we performed better than the industry averages, it's encouraging knowing that we continue to improve our safety performance during the pandemic. I am so proud of the way our teams are navigating through COVID-nineteen, executing on our objectives and now delivering a new long term business plan.
This morning, David Hutchins will walk through the details of our new 5 year capital plan and Jocelyn Perry will provide an update on our 5 year financial outlook. Before turning the call over to them, I'll spend a few minutes reviewing our long term outlook and sustainability initiatives, including the corporate wide carbon reduction target announced today. With 10 utility businesses serving over 3,000,000 electric and gas customers, our focus on regulated transmission and distribution, we are a premium North American energy delivery business. Our decentralized model, where local teams have the authority to manage their businesses, positions us well to provide customers safe and reliable service. When you factor in our geographic and regulatory diversity, we have a strong and differentiated business driving low risk, high quality results.
This simple yet effective business model has yielded strong results with our market capitalization over $24,000,000,000 and total shareholder returns averaging 14% annually over the past 20 years. In 2020, our rate base is expected to reach over $30,000,000,000 representing a $2,000,000,000 or approximately an 8% increase over 2019 rate base. Our long term strategy and growth utilities, including our largest acquisition, the purchase of ITC in 2016. I'm so happy we acquired the businesses that we did when we did. With our acquisitive chapter behind us, we have successfully transitioned the company to organic growth, which is expected to drive our growth strategy for years to come.
Today, we've announced our 2021 to 2025 5 year outlook. Key highlights of the new plan include investing $19,600,000,000 into our 10 utilities, which increases rate base on average by approximately 6 percent annually, and we've extended our 6% average annual dividend growth guidance to 2025. The plan was developed to ensure our utilities provide safe, reliable and affordable service to our customers. Given our track record, the quality of our businesses and strong team, I am very optimistic about Fortis' future. Turning now to one of my favorite slides.
Earlier today, we announced a 5.8 percent 4th quarter dividend increase, marking 47 years consecutive years of dividend increases, a record we're extremely proud of. Our low risk energy delivery business and strong growth platform gives us the confidence to continue this record. Turning to Slide 9, I would like to take a few minutes to talk about the progress we have made on the sustainability front. I'm proud of where we are. Fortis' low emissions profile is supported by our focus on transmission and distribution.
We are committed to further strengthening our already low carbon emissions profile. At the end of 2019, we had approximately 12,000,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Scope 1 emissions. For reference, Scope 1 emissions are defined as direct emissions from owned or controlled sources. Of those Scope 1 emissions, approximately 90% are generated from our vertically integrated utility in Arizona at TEP. And with TEP's latest integrated resource plan, the company expects to significantly reduce its Scope 1 emissions by exiting coal fired generation and replacing it with approximately 2,400 megawatts of wind and solar and 1400 megawatts of energy storage.
To better understand how our 2019 Scope 1 emissions compare to the sector, we ranked ourselves against our 25 peers comprised of 22 U. S. Utilities and 3 Canadian utilities. Overall, our 2019 scope 1 emissions were lower than approximately half of our peers. The Fortis' profile improves significantly when excluding the emissions associated with TEP.
To demonstrate our commitment to a cleaner energy future, we've now announced today an ambitious corporate wide carbon emissions reduction target of 75% by 2,035 compared to 2019 levels. This target adopts a deliberate 15 year reduction plan providing sufficient time to support the communities and employees affected. While the bulk of the target will be met through generation resource changes outlined in TEP's integrated resource plan, achieving our target requires all of our utilities to provide customers with cleaner energy and reduce their environmental footprint. Through execution of this target, Fortis expects to have approximately 99% of its assets dedicated to energy delivery and carbon free generation by 2,035. Beyond reducing Scope 1 emissions, our group of utilities aim to reduce Scope 2 and 3 emissions, often referred to as indirect emissions as well as global greenhouse gas emissions.
Notably FortisBC will be working to meet its 30 by 30 target, which is focused on reducing customer missions and increasing LNG bunkering to facilitate cleaner fuel options for the marine sector. At ITC, the transmission system there will improve emissions by interconnecting more renewables to the grid. In Ontario, the Wataynikitiap Power Project is another example of our focus to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. The project will allow for the elimination of small scale diesel generation by connecting remote communities to Ontario's cleaner energy grid through 1800 kilometers of transmission line. Each of our 10 utilities are focused on improving their respective environmental footprint beyond the target through efforts such as electric vehicle penetration and energy efficiency initiatives.
As we continue to focus on regulated energy delivery, continuously improving our sustainability profile remains a priority. Beyond our environmental focus, we are an industry leader on safety and reliability. From a governance perspective, we are consistently recognized for our strong governance practices grounded in local leadership and independence. We are committed to inclusion, equity and diversity and have established a framework to take an active role on this front. Today, females represent 40% of our Fortis Inc.
Directors, 3 of our 10 utility presidents and 60% of employees at our corporate ad office. Our local leaders are supporting their local communities. The Fortis Google Companies made more than $12,000,000 in community investments in 2019. As I said earlier, I'm proud of where we are on the environmental, social and governance front. I'll now turn the call over to David Hutchins for an update on our 5 year capital plan.
Thank you, Barry, and good morning, everyone. Having been with the Fortis family for 6 years now, I can remember our first Investor Day back in 2015 when we were forecasting 5 year capital investments of $9,000,000,000 And now today, we have more than doubled that amount with our nearly $20,000,000,000 capital plan for the next 5 years. This equates to an average of $4,000,000,000 per year that will be invested in our energy systems to maintain safe and reliable service while ensuring it remains affordable to our customers. 80% of our 5 year capital plan will be spent in our electric utilities across North America and the Caribbean and 20% in our gas businesses in British Columbia, Arizona and New York. Approximately 55% is expected to be invested in the United States, 41% in Canada and the remaining investments in the Caribbean.
The 5 year capital plan represents an $800,000,000 increase over and above the prior plan for 2020 to 2024. This is impressive when you consider our forecasted 2020 capital plan of 4,300,000,000 dollars will be a record year of investments for the company and rolls off the new 5 year plan. Turning to Slide 15, Our capital plan's low execution risk continues to improve with only 11 projects or 15% of the 5 year plan deemed major projects. We define major projects as those with total capital spend over $200,000,000 which is just 1% of the 5 year plan. The remaining 85% are smaller projects required to maintain safe and reliable service to our customers.
Similar to last year's plan, our 3 largest utilities, ITC, FortisBC and UNS, account for approximately 2 thirds of our 5 year total. Notably, FortisBC added $500,000,000 largely driven by 2 new major projects, which I'll touch on shortly. At Central Hudson, additional investments in information technology systems, facilities and storm hardening contributed to a $200,000,000 increase. At ITC, the 5 year plan increased $100,000,000 primarily due to the required capital to support interconnections and system rebuilds that provide additional capacity and other benefits. With ITC, Fortis owns 1 of the best transmission infrastructure companies in North America with approximately 16,000 miles of transmission assets strategically positioned in 7 states across the U.
S. Midwest. 70% of ITC's $5,000,000,000 capital plan is dedicated to investments to maintain system reliability, such as replacing aging infrastructure, increasing capacity, improving efficiencies and adding resiliency to the grid. ITC will play a critical role in building the grid of the future by connecting customers to clean energy resources and interconnecting markets. ITC expects to invest $700,000,000 over the next 5 years to interconnect 2,800 megawatts of new renewables to ITC's transmission system.
The additional renewables reflect integrated resource plans filed by the distribution utilities in ITC's footprint as well as known and anticipated interconnection agreements. ITC has $400,000,000 planned for major capital projects, including the completion of the last multi value project and continuation of the 30 4.5 kV to 69 kV conversion project in the ITC Midwest system. Investments to improve physical and cybersecurity of the grid account for an additional $400,000,000 of the capital plan. In British Columbia, our innovative natural gas and electric franchise expects to invest over $4,000,000,000 in capital over the next 5 years to improve system integrity and resiliency, expand their liquefied natural gas or LNG infrastructure and modernize its distribution system. With 1,200,000 customers, investments centered around safety and integrity of its system are paramount.
The 5 year plan includes $1,000,000,000 for natural gas infrastructure projects. This includes expansion of Tilbury's liquefaction capacity and an additional LNG storage tank to increase resiliency of the system, as well as approximately $100,000,000 for renewable natural gas projects. The Tilbury LNG project contributes $200,000,000 of incremental investments to the new 5 year plan. This project will allow for increased LNG storage at the Tilbury site and increase the available regasification capacity to provide the lower Mainland customers with short term backup supply. Earlier this year, FortisBC filed an initial project description with regulators and began the environmental assessment processes to further expand the site.
The next steps for the projects include FortisBCE filing a certificate of public convenience and necessity, otherwise known as a CPCN application with the BCUC in early 2021. Also FortisBC added the advanced metering infrastructure or AMI project, which calls for replacement or retrofitting of residential, commercial and industrial gas meters with new investments of approximately $250,000,000 included in the new 5 year plan. The next steps for this project include FortisBC filing a CPCN application with the BCUC by early 2021. Both projects are expected to be completed after 2025 and FortisBC continues to refine cost estimates in preparation of those CPCN applications. The current estimates for the project's total cost are approximately $700,000,000 for the Tilbury LNG tank project and $300,000,000 for the AMI project.
In Arizona, UNS has $3,800,000,000 of capital expenditures planned over the next 5 years in its vertically integrated utilities. These investments are balanced across the value chain with approximately $1,300,000,000 planned for investments in distribution systems, dollars 1,100,000,000 for transmission to improve reliability and meet future energy needs and $800,000,000 mainly for clean energy resources to support the greenhouse gas reductions outlined in TEP's Integrated Resource Plan. To help show our path to a cleaner energy future, let me now play a brief video for you on the progress we're making in Arizona to reduce our emissions. Thomas Edison revolutionized the world with the first practical light bulb in 18/79. Innovation has defined the electric utility industry ever since.
Right now, in the grasslands of Eastern New Mexico, crews are building massive wind turbines that will help power Southern Arizona. When finished, they'll stand 6 50 feet high, more than twice the height of Statue of Liberty. For Tucson Electric Power, those towers symbolize a decade of energy transformation. We've made giant strides towards greater sustainability and we're not done yet. We're getting better all the time at harvesting energy from the sun and the wind.
Electric vehicles are helping ease our dependence on gasoline and new technology is helping us use energy more efficiently. We could not be more energized about the changes that are reshaping the work that we do. Right now, we're working on 3 new projects that will double our renewable energy resources. The Oso Grande wind project will be the company's largest clean energy resource and our Borderlands wind project will add even more clean wind power to help balance the increasing solar we have installed on our system. The Wilmot Energy Center, which will be our largest local solar array, will include our largest battery storage system.
Next year, we will have enough renewable energy to supply 30% of our customers' electricity needs, And we are not stopping there. We're working closely with our stakeholders and climate experts to find the quickest way to reduce our carbon footprint while still honoring our commitment to you to provide reliable and affordable energy. That video stopped just short of the big reveal, TEP's integrated resource plan that will help lead Fortis to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 75% over the next 15 years. And only a fraction of the investments needed for this transition occurs over the next 5 years since the Oso Grande wind project will be completed this year and the majority of the 2,400 megawatts of renewables and 1400 megawatts of storage will occur after this 5 year plan. This sets us up for an exciting future.
We have additional opportunities to expand and extend investments across our businesses by connecting renewable energy resources to the grid, adding LNG infrastructure, increasing investments in energy efficiency and expanding low carbon transportation. I will now turn the call over to Jocelyn, who will walk you through the financial outlook.
Thank you, David, and good morning, everyone. As David highlighted, our new 5 year capital plan is rooted in investing in our existing regulated energy delivery assets to ensure safe and reliable service, as well as investing in projects which support a cleaner energy future. This morning, I'll provide you with an update on how our capital plan will translate into rate based growth, as well as provide an update on our funding plan. And I'll also spend some time this morning reviewing our regulatory proceedings with you. With that, turning to Slide 23, consolidated rate base is expected to grow by approximately $10,000,000,000 or nearly $1,000,000,000 every 6 months through 2025.
And to put this in perspective, our largest utility ITC is projecting rate base just shy of $10,000,000,000 by the end of this year. So it's like adding another ITC to portfolio over the next 5 years. Rate base is expected to grow from approximately $30,000,000,000 in 2020 to over $40,000,000,000 by 2025. This yields 3 5 year compound average annual growth rates of approximately 6.5% and 6%, respectively. Similar to last year, we continue to see strong rate base growth across our portfolio of utilities.
Central Hudson continues to lead the way with 5 year rate base growth of over 9%, driven by investments in information technology and other infrastructure upgrades. Overall, we expect our annual consolidated rate base growth of about 6% will be supported by our 3 largest utilities, ITC, FortisBC and UNS Energy. Turning now to our funding plan. As you can see from the pie chart, the bulk of our capital plan is expected to be funded from cash from operations and debt issued at our regulated utilities. And this should come as no surprise given our capital plan is effectively all regulated.
With regards to our equity needs, you may recall late last year we decided to take advantage of favorable market conditions and accelerated our equity funding issuing $1,200,000,000 of common shares. The net proceeds of the equity issue were used to repay corporate debt, including the redemption of US500 $1,000,000 unsecured notes and repayment of credit facility borrowing. In conjunction with the equity issuance, we decided at the time to terminate the 2% discount on our dividend reinvestment program. And with this termination of the discount, DRIP participation is currently at 5%. As the pie chart on the slide indicates, 6% of our $19,600,000,000 5 year capital plan is expected to be funded through our DRIP program.
With the increase in our capital plan coupled with the fact we are receiving lower than expected DRIP participation, we've elected to reinstate the 2% discount on our DRIP effective December 1. We expect participation will increase to approximately 20% annually upon the discount being reinstated. We continue to take a conservative approach to running our business and our funding plan positions us well within our existing credit ratings. In 2019, we met all credit rating agencies thresholds and significantly improved our cash flow to debt and holding company debt metrics. The significant improvement was reflective of the acceleration of our funding strategy, including the equity issuance and sale of Waneta Expansion Project earlier in 2019.
During 2020, all three of our rating agencies affirmed our existing credit ratings, while highlighting the execution of our funding plan in 2019 and Fortis' low business risk profile, driven by geographic and regulatory diversity across our subsidiaries. Over the next 5 years, our funding plan will enable us to maintain credit metrics similar to where we finished at the end of 2019. Moody's CFO to debt metric in particular is expected to average 12% over the planning period and S and P FFO to debt is expected to average 11%. Both the Moody's and S and P metrics are above thresholds required to maintain our current ratings. The reinstatement of our 2% discount on our dividend reinvestment plan is expected to provide additional financial flexibility while further strengthening our balance sheet.
Fortis is well positioned to execute on our 5 year capital plan and maintain our strong credit profile. Slide 27 illustrates our expected debt maturities over the next 5 years and our strong liquidity position and highlights some of our recent activity in the debt capital markets. As you can see from the table, we expect average fixed term debt maturities of around $1,000,000,000 annually over the next 5 years, the majority of which are at our regulated utilities. At the end of June, we had over $5,000,000,000 in liquidity, which includes credit facilities at our regulated utilities and our corporate facilities. Most of our credit facilities are unsecured facilities with maturities ranging from 2022 to 2025.
Fortis is in a strong position as we continue to work through COVID-nineteen pandemic and execute on our capital plan. Lastly, Fortis continues to remain active in the debt capital markets and have issued approximately $3,000,000,000 in long term debt in 2020. More recently, 2 of our larger utilities FortisBC and TEP issued inaugural green bonds. Both offerings received strong investor demand. FortisBC's green bond was the first for a natural gas utility in Canada and final pricing reflected the lowest long dated Canadian corporate coupon on record.
Now turning to updates on our ongoing regulatory proceedings. Although not depicted on the slide, we recently received clarity on key regulatory proceedings at 2 of our largest utilities. In May 2020, ITC received an order from FERC regarding ITC's MISO based ROE, which resulted in an all in ROE of 10.77%. More recently in June, the BCUC issued a final order approving FortisBC's multi year rate plan, which sets the rate setting framework for 2020 through 2024. At ITC, there have been no further updates since the Q2 with respect to the notice of proposed rulemaking on transmission incentives as comments from stakeholders were due to FERC by July 1.
In Arizona, the TEP rate case continues to progress. Hearings concluded in June and post hearing briefs were filed in July August, and we continue to expect a decision by year end. In New York, the Public Service Commission approved Central Hudson's request to delay the previously approved July 1 electric and gas rate increase to help customers through the financial challenges of COVID-nineteen. The revenues will be deferred and collected from October 1 through June 30, 2021. Given Central Hudson's 3 year plan concludes next year on June 30, 2021, last month the utility filed a general rate application with the New York Public Commission.
The rate filing aims to balance customer bill impacts with the need to advance climate and energy policy, improve the safety and resiliency of utility systems and enhance customer interactions. We expect a decision in mid-twenty 21. In Alberta, the generic cost of capital proceedings for utility in the province remains outstanding. Currently, approved cost of capital parameters will remain in place on a final basis for 2021, one full quarter at a time and continuing until the end of the quarter in which the commission makes a decision, which is expected in 2021. And lastly, Fortis Alberta awaits a decision by the AUC with respect to the Alberta Electric System Operators customer contribution policy related to transmission investment.
Fortis Alberta filed additional evidence in July and additional procedural steps concluded just last week. We continue to expect the decision later this year. And with that, this concludes my remarks and I'll now turn the call back to Barry.
Thank you, Jocelyn. To wrap up, I'm pleased to outline for you another strong 5 year plan. As we embark on a cleaner energy future, we expect our growth profile will be enhanced for many years to come. The pace at which we plan to reduce our carbon emissions over the next 15 years is aggressive and places us as an industry leader. By 2,035, our business will be made up of virtually all energy delivery assets and renewable carbon free generation.
What an exciting time for Fortis and the industry. We look forward to executing on this next chapter of growth. With that, I'll turn the call back to Stephanie.
Thank you, Barry. This concludes the presentation. At this time, we'd like to open the call to address questions from the investment community.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now conduct a question and answer period. Our first question comes from the line of Robert Kwan of RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Great. Good morning. I guess just to start, Barry, all the best in retirement Congratulations, Dave, on the new role.
Thank you, Robert.
Yes. You're welcome. So there's obviously a focus here and you've had a focus on your ESG profile. And I'm wondering if you can just give some color marrying ESG with the investment decisions. Obviously, anything decarbonization wise on spending is a clear win.
But given your focus on ESG, when you're looking at future investments, how much are you looking at emissions, both Scope 1, but as well Scope 2 and Scope 3 when deciding whether to take them on or put differently, how much do emissions factor into the investment decision? Would you take on a project that makes your emissions profile worse and then just figure out how to mitigate it later?
Great question, Robert. And maybe I'll take a stab at it and David and Josh, you can jump in. Clearly, what we're finding, Robert, is as we engage with our shareholders, this is a topic that is present in just about every engagement now. And Fortis, clearly, we are fortunate that we put together a group of utilities that was focused on transmission and distribution that really had a from a Scope 1 perspective at least had a very low footprint. And in some cases, we don't even own the energy that we move down our lines, right?
That's the way the regulatory model works. We did have the vertically integrated utility in Arizona at TEP and that seemed to be the outlier for us, right? And with David's work and his team in Arizona now to basically cut those emissions dramatically in Arizona brings Fortis into this place that we have this very light environmental footprint. So from our perspective, as we go forward from here, the things we decide to do, we'll always be thinking about whether it improves our position or does not improve our position. And if it doesn't improve our position, we're going to be very careful to be offering up mitigating plans that will quickly get us back on-site.
So this is not going away. This is going to be a continued focus for our industry. I'm actually so proud of where the industry is going on this, frankly, that it's just very exciting time. So I think it will be present in everything we do going forward from here. David, any other thoughts?
Yes. I would reiterate what you said, Barry, is when you look at basically any decision that any company makes, any significant decision, in the back of your mind is going to be emissions, greenhouse gas impacts, etcetera. It's going to be part of our going forward decision making process, period. The goal that we set today of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions by 75% isn't a goal you can just phone in. This is going to take a lot of action on our part and execution down here in Arizona to make sure we get there.
And with that goal, we know that every decision that we make on a going forward basis has to contribute to us meeting or exceeding that goal. So, yes, it's basically it's almost table stakes now. New projects, what is the impact on our greenhouse gas emissions, etcetera.
Got it. And maybe if I can ask one other question just around the capital plan. Can you just speak a little bit more to the composition, what is behind the numbers framing that against the top line growth rate? That's moderating slightly. Is this just the law of large numbers or are there things moving around such as larger initiatives that are rolling off?
I guess just typically what we've seen is more meaningful less in the near years coupled with what we've seen here being those larger increases in the out years as you firm out the numbers?
Well, Robert, I think since I'm not going to be here to execute on the 5 year plan, I'm going to let David and Jocelyn weigh in on that one. I know what I would say. So but you need to hear from those folks.
Well, Robert, first, I'll say that you are right. It is the law. It's the curse of being successful. We are coming off of a very big year. So that is tempering some of the growth.
And you're right, we do have some timing of our capital projects in the later years. So what you're seeing is that not everything is hitting rate base just yet either. So there's some math that's happening. And ultimately what we're seeing over the next 3 years is a 6.5% growth and that's what we had shown last year over the 5 years. So I expect and David I'm going to speak for you, but today we're seeing this past year we've seen 8% growth over the next 3% were 6.5%.
We tend to find a little more as we go out. So I would say the future is looking pretty consistent to last year.
Yes, I'd just add a couple of things there Jocelyn. You nailed it with it's the starting point, right? So Robert, when you look at the capital expenditures that we had over the past couple of years, they were record, each one was a record. 2019 was a record, 2020 is larger still. And I know Barry really wanted to say this, but I'll say it and channel Barry a little bit.
And that's we've exceeded every 5 year forecast since he's been CEO. I don't plan on on losing that streak on a going forward basis.
Our next question comes from Linda Ezergailis of TD Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Thank you. And I want to also offer all my best wishes to Barry on your retirement and big congratulations to Dave on your promotion. It's a very exciting time for the company.
Thank you, Linda. Thank you.
Thank you.
Looking at the opportunities you have to expand and extend your capital plan, I'm just wondering if you can help us understand within UNS and the IRP, this total opportunity of 4,000,000,000 to 6,000,000,000 dollars how much of that is already in your 5 year capital plan and how much of that is incremental? And can you paint a picture of us as to what would be required, what factors need to be put in place to translate that full IRP opportunity into your plans? Or is it just some of it a matter of being beyond your 5 year planning horizon as well?
Over to you,
David, and take that Barry. As far as when you look at the plan that we have laid out over the next 5 years, there's only about a 5th or a 6th of that total that's in the next 5 years. So one of the things that we're spending a lot of time on now is developing exactly what that plan looks like on a going forward basis. It takes some time to develop the renewables, the storage, transmission interconnections, the bigger, broader plan of what we're going to need to do to actually execute on that. So we will be providing more guidance as we spend probably the next, I would say, year or so to come up with a good solid plan.
And those will be investments that we're going to need in total, and a lot of that is what we plan on owning within our own utility and earning on. So lots of details to be determined on a going forward basis and we're going to provide you all with frequent updates as we start laying those things in, both in the next 5 years and in the 5 to 10 year cycle.
Thank you. And one of the other just as a follow on, one of the other significant opportunities that you've been working on in BC for some time, I think really at the forefront of this development is this renewable gas target of 15% by 2,030. Can you talk about the magnitude of investment required? How much of that would be within the utility? How much of it might be require investments by 3rd party?
And also, more broadly, how hydrogen might supplement some of the renewable gas opportunities as well?
So Linda, I think we have about $100,000,000 in this current 5 year plan and there will be more after that clearly. And there will be a mix of projects that we own and projects that we enter into PPAs with to buy renewable gas from. Roger or David, maybe Roger, Roger is on the line, I believe. Roger, can you just offer some thoughts around some further details around Linda's question?
Yes. Thanks, Barry. Good morning, Linda. Yes, so in the 5 year plan, Barry is right, we have about $100,000,000 of net investment for a couple of facilities that we'll own in the utility. City of Vancouver is a primary one.
We're working on a couple of others. We have about 6 petajoules. Our target of 15% will be about 25 to 30 petajoules of natural gas. We have about 6 petajoules approved. The majority of those will be long term supply contracts.
We have a number in excess of that in the development stage. And again, the majority of those are contracted supply. We'll be looking at supply within BC, which where we're likely going to invest capital, that $100,000,000 for the next 5 years and then in excess of that beyond to get to 2,030. But we're also looking at out of province. So for us, we think the majority of the supply will come from third parties, and we'll look to be the offtake under long term supply arrangements.
Hydrogen, right now, we're in the feasibility and pilot stage. We are looking at 2 primary approaches to hydrogen. One is the blending of hydrogen into the distribution system, maybe up to 5% hydrogen, which will decarbonize the natural gas stream. And then we're also looking at closed loop systems industrial applications where we can displace natural gas and use hydrogen within industrial sites. But the hydrogen is still in the, what I would say, the feasibility and pilot stage.
Thank you, Roger.
That's helpful. Thank you. And just as a follow-up for Jocelyn, looking at these opportunities to expand the capital plan, can you talk about what the incremental source of financing might be for this beyond what's already secured?
Well, Linda, I think that's going to depend on some timing of these capital projects. But we've said this before that any what we want to do is maintain our position strength. We've made a lot of improvements in our balance sheet over the last number of years and we're certainly looking to go forward from there. If we're successful, when we're successful on increasing any incremental capital investments, then I think everything goes back on the table from whatever equity we need to I'd say we run the gamut of everything when we're looking at funding options. So everything goes back on the table at that time, Linda.
Great. Thank you. I'll jump back in the queue.
Our next question comes from the line of Rob Hope of Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning, everyone. And Barry, all the best from environment. And David, congratulations on the new role.
Thank you, Rob.
I want to follow-up on Robert Kwan's question about ESG. It's increasingly coming up in investment decisions. However, how are regulators and other stakeholders looking at the potential for lower environmental emissions in regards to future capital investments as well as the potential for higher rates. Are we seeing a willingness to allow the bill to move up to reduce the carbon
emissions?
Rob, listen, that's the big question, right? And I think companies have to figure out how to do this without having any big impacts on their customers. There will be some increases, I would say, but they have that customer concern has to be front and center. We have to be able to continue to do this while keeping rates affordable. Clearly, in Arizona's case, moving away from coal and basically using the operating costs that we have today to operate those plants and having that to pay for the investments in renewables mitigates the impact on customers, right?
That's a really good news story. And you could apply that in the Caribbean as we think about expanding our renewable fleet in the Caribbean. The cost of fuel should be able to pay for the cost of those investments without having a big impact on customer rates. So that's the secret sauce. How can you do this and get cleaner energy and not have an impact big impact on customer rates?
And that's what we're focused on. And I think generally, I think the industry, except for some massive government projects that have caused some real severe trouble in certain parts of probably Canada, the industry has done a pretty damn good job of getting cleaner without a big impact on customer rates.
All right. I appreciate that color. And then maybe just as a follow-up, as you look at ITC in the Midwest and the potential for incremental wind capacity there, how long of a runway do you think on this do you have on ITC and some above average growth rates there?
Well, we have the lady on the call to answer that. Linda is there. And I'll reiterate the highlight of my career was purchasing ICC and listing Fortis because of that on the New York Stock Exchange. And I couldn't be happier about how it's worked out for our company. Linda and their team have done an incredible job and we'll continue to do so.
So Linda, over to you.
Great. Thanks, Barry, and thanks, Rob, for
the question. Yes, look, I think stepping back and I think if you look at the bigger picture and sort of the bigger opportunity set, I would compare it to the MISO MVP process that took place about 10 years ago. And I think when you think about the MVP process in terms of sort of what were the fundamental underlying issues, obviously increasing demand, desire for more and more renewables, And ultimately, what was the timeline to sort of, I guess, come to sort of a broader agreement on how we were going to pay for these bigger regional projects. All of that took the better part of probably 5 years. And then once the portfolio was approved, it took the better part of about a decade to see sort of all of those investments come to fruition and sort of be represented in rate base.
So as I think about where we are, particularly in the Midwest ISO, given the queue for renewables, there is a lot of ongoing discussion, a lot of studies, a lot of engagement by stakeholders that recognize the need for more transmission to facilitate renewables. My gut is that we're probably within a year to 2 years from some sort of overarching agreements. I think then we need to get a portfolio that identifies what are the specific transmission projects. And then I think from there, depending on sort of how about the processes, I think much of that can be realized over the course of a decade. And so that's sort of how I would think about a timeframe.
But certainly, some projects will be able to move faster sooner depending on the state, depending on siting requirements, regulatory approvals. And so it doesn't mean that every project is going to take 10 years. I just think from an overall portfolio process, I have to think about it in terms of a decade.
All right. Appreciate the color and all the best everyone.
Thank you, Rob.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Mark Jarvi of CIBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
First, congratulations to both Barry and David. And then I'm guessing the question comes yes, question comes back to some of the prior comments and moderation of growth and extending the sort of runway for growth. And you think about some tailwinds that have happened and created headroom for rate base growth that maybe fade, whether it's lower fuel costs and tax rates and interest rates, but then sort of growing load and electrification trends. So maybe if you think about those, how do you see those kind of lining up in terms of tailwinds that have been there that maybe fade and then growing load. And so as you think about and the extension of runway to 2025 and beyond, which one of your utilities you have most confidence in sort of making that transition and benefiting from load growth as other tailwinds abate?
That's a big question, Mark. I'm really feeling there's lots of tailwinds, right, in the industry. And the utility industry in North America, I'm so proud to have been part of it because it's done such a damn good job of cleaning up the portfolio of energy supply, making the grid more reliable, dealing with all the storm response, all those things and really working with customers to deliver what they're looking for, which is cleaner energy. I think our regulators generally across North America have been very responsive to what the utilities have been doing. So I think that's I think it's got a lot of runway.
I think those tailwinds around cleaner energy, grid resiliency, all that is still there. And cost of renewables have come down so much. The fact that we can build a wind farm in New Mexico at 50% capacity, get it into Tucson so cheaply, man, that's just so impressive. And that's going to continue. So when I think about this 5 years that we've laid out, we're a T and D business growing 6.5% really diversified.
That's pretty impressive. Keeping that going beyond this 5 year plan, which I fully expect this team to do, support that dividend guidance, that's the value proposition in Fortis. And I think there's still lots of tailwinds that are there. So Alberta, we have a little bit of slowdown right now. That's one business that because of the double, I guess, impact of pandemic and the impact on oil and gas, that business is not quite growing as much as it used to in the past.
And it's still a great business. We still love Alberta. And I think they'll find their footing and be a big part of that economy there once Alberta comes out of this. So that but that business is where we have a little bit of slower growth at this point in time. But I'm not giving up on Alberta or anything.
I'm still it was always the mainstay of Fortis' growth. And I think my gut, it returns that. It's a pure distribution electric business, and it's an incredible franchise. So that but that's one that is going through a bit of a rough time right now.
Yes, I recognize that's a bit of a broad question. So thanks for that, Terry. And maybe more specifically, and this will be for David, is when you think about the transition to renewables at TEP, just your thought process on future procurement through PPAs versus the build own transfer. How much of that renewables and storage you want to be put into rate base over
the next decade? Yes. Thanks, Mark. I think the short answer is as much as we can. We think that's the best way to integrate renewables is to have that full picture and operational control of the assets.
Batteries are going to be extremely important in balancing the renewable energy from wind and solar. And in order to make that make sense, you have to have the full operational capability and flexibility at your own discretion. And really, the only way to do that to extract as much value out of the renewables and the batteries and to provide that reliability is to own a good portion of those assets. Now we've done PPAs mostly to date, other than Oso Grande and a few small solar projects, most of the existing portfolio is PPAs. So we plan on blending that out so that we get a much more even balance of PPAs and ownership and actually even lean towards ownership when you look at it as on a total portfolio basis.
But I'd like to go back to your other question there, Mark, and just to add a little bit. I mean, you call it tailwinds, I call them a bit of a breeze is all. I think what we've got is on a going forward basis is more like Galeforce tailwinds as we go into the clean energy future. When you look at what we're doing in Arizona, etcetera, that's going to happen across the entire North American continent. And I think that provides us a ton of opportunity and a ton of long term growth options as we look forward.
Electric vehicles, I mean, that's not a tailwind. They're barely here yet. Right now is when we're starting to invest in electric vehicle infrastructure. Look, this stuff is just at the tip of the iceberg. If we're really going to get a carbon free or near carbon free, low carbon, whichever term you prefer, society, there's going to have to be a ton of investments and things that deliver clean natural gas, hydrogen, electricity across the entire North American continent, and we just happen to be in that business.
Great. And maybe just one last one for Jocelyn. Just in terms of the funding plan, it seems like the percentage contribution from debt goes up. Is that just the fact that cost of debt has come down and cash flows have come up even the equity raise? I mean just any other incremental details in terms of how that pie has shifted over the last year in terms of funding?
Yes, part of that Mark is that as I said during the call, we've pre funded some of the equity. So it shifts around that pie a bit And there's some timing of debt, you're right in that. But no systemic changes to really how we're funding our capital plan going forward, just more timing of equity and timing of debt.
Okay. Thank you all.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from Neil Colton of Wells Fargo Securities.
Congrats to all as well.
Thanks, Amit.
Yes, I just want to follow-up a little bit on ITC. So we can all see the needs coming in the Midwest. And it's a little bit unclear the timing and exactly how it's going to play out from a process standpoint. But I'm curious, it's characterized sort of MVP2. It's going to be a bidding process, I would imagine, for some of these projects.
Returns could be a little bit lower and
we'll see how that plays out. But I'm wondering, is there also a pretty significant knock on effect as these lines get built out for the existing infrastructure, where you would need to upgrade that and there's sort of certainty in that CapEx. So is that the case? And how significant could that be?
Linda, you want to jump in?
Sure. Yes. So Neil, I think, as you think about sort of what I think you referred to as sort of MVP2, for lack of a better term, I think it's too soon to say as to whether that will be competitively bid or not. One thing I would highlight and note though is that in the state of Iowa as well as Minnesota, both of those states have right of first refusal. So that would in terms of us being the incumbent transmission provider, we would retain that ability to build those investments that exist within our footprint.
So I just wanted to highlight that, but I would say more overarching, I think too soon to say whether all of those projects would be subject to competitive bidding. Beyond that, look, I think the study process that takes place within the RTO in terms of any new projects or new investments, we work hand in hand with the respective RTO to understand what are the other system impacts. And in some cases, yes, there are additional investments or upgrades that are required to support new investment just given the way the new flows on the system materialize. But I think at this point in time, it's premature to know or to say what, if any, of those incremental investments as a result of a new regional project would be. Obviously, we have to first understand what those projects are and then go through the extensive study work to understand the broader system impact.
Thank you.
Yes. Thanks, Neil.
Our next question comes from the line of Ben Pham of BMO. Please proceed with your question. Mr. Pham, you may be on mute.
Okay. Sorry about that. Good morning, everybody. Thanks for update. I wanted to ask, in terms of your rate base growth, it's moving around a little bit here, but still quite robust.
Can you
think of your EPS trajectory though, which is probably more of a focus for me going forward? If you look at the last few years, there's been disconnect in EPS growth and rate base growth and that EPS has been trending below for a number of different reasons. But as you look forward, my question is really, do you think the EPS growth rate is going to trend more towards the rate base growth now or even above especially next year with Arizona do you expect a different scenario?
So Ben, we don't give guidance around EPS growth. But generally, yes, I would say the expectation is rate based growth generally is a proxy for our dividend guidance and which means EPS growth should be pretty close there too as well. I always caution that Fortis, we have a lot of regulated businesses. There are times when we're in rate cases, times when we're not. So we're not that perfect curve that goes up.
But over the long term, as you invest this capital in the ground and grow rate base by $2,000,000,000 a year, it does show up in earnings and support the long term guidance for the company. So yes, I do believe that looking back 5 years from now that we would have seen assuming everything else remains basically the same that we will have seen that growth in EPS that corresponds to rate based growth, dividend growth. Okay.
And then maybe on the topic of sustainability, ESG, it's a big focus for you guys. And to continue an earlier question on that topic, are you finding through your conversations with existing new investors that your co exposure now albeit being relatively low, is that precluding potential investments in your shares? And then the letter related areas, as you look at your scope onetwo emissions there, they look still below any sort of thresholds for preclusions. But are you planning that investors could start to tilt more towards including Scope 3 emissions over time? Is that is it a thought process in terms of where investors are going long term?
So Ben, no, we are not getting I don't think there might be 1 or 2 funds in the world that don't invest in our company because we own some coal in Arizona. But I think the more sophisticated investors are seeing the opportunities to invest in companies who are moving away from coal and investing in renewables. We always were put in a pretty good box because this part of our business was so small overall and now we're actually exiting coal. So that it's just even more powerful in terms of our of what we present to the market and to folks that are focused on ESG investing. So for us, it's just been a continued, I guess, improvement in what we present to the market.
And I forget the last question. What was the latter part of your question, Ben?
Yes. So I was asking about there's to continue there's an earlier question around your scope 1 and 3 emissions. And it seems like there's been a big focus on just looking at Scope 1 direct emissions and it seems like gravitating more towards even including Scope 2, the power you're buying. And I was rough populations that suggest those 2 are still in a decent spot. But you start including stuff like business travel, greenhouse gas from indirect stuff, it starts to maybe tilt dramatically higher there.
And so are you getting a sense with your team that that's where the world's moving towards an investment standpoint and preclusions? Just thinking more longer term here and some of your comments on sustainability.
Yes. So, Ben, Nora Duke is here. She heads up our sustainability efforts. And I'm going to get her to wade in on that question because I would tell you that just generally though that when we did those scan of our sector in North America, what we were seeing is the utilities were focused on Scope 1 emissions. For example, Scope 3 for us, where it's the emissions of our customers, if you think about say ITC, ITC gets paid to move electrons down its transmission system.
We don't have any control. In fact, we're not even allowed to own generation. We actually don't even own the electricity. We just get paid for moving it. So that's the beauty of a lot of Fortis' assets, whether it be Alberta, whether it be ITC or New York is that our part of the value chain is we're getting paid for moving this stuff.
So in fact, we can't even wait into where it's going. Now we can participate in industry forums and all that kind of stuff, but and have a voice, but there's only so far we can go on it. Nora, you want to just Yes.
Just thanks Ben. So as Barry suggested, yes, we're very much focused on the scope 1 for purposes of this target because it is obviously direct emissions and those that we can most directly influence. Although they are a very small part of our footprint as Barry suggested. In terms of your question on Scope 3, certainly all of our utilities are very much focused on that. You think of our efforts around energy efficiency, end use with customers, FortisBC, a huge effort in terms of energy efficiency.
So that is a build out of our effort. I would say it's not around our target, but it is part of our everyday efforts that all of our distribution utilities are focused on.
All right,
great. And maybe my last question is for Jocelyn on some of the on the balance sheet. And I was wondering, is there any sort of refinancing opportunities that you see ahead there with record low interest rates, maybe the 2023 HoldCo debt or your preferred shares. You've seen one of your peers came down perhaps issuing debt taking advantage of that. Is there anything in the horizon that you see?
There's nothing right now, Ben, but I'll tell you it's something that we're always looking at. Even with our subs, as you know, we've done a lot of financing this year that was advancing a lot of it forward. And we did have a look at refinancing opportunities. So we're always watching it. And it depends on where we are within our capital plan and the cash we need and all those considerations.
But it is something that's on our radar. It is.
Okay. All right, great. Thank you very much.
Thanks, Ben.
Our next question comes from the line of Michael Sullivan of Wolfe. Please proceed with your question.
Yes. Hey, everyone. Good morning. Barry and David, congrats.
Thank you.
My question was just going back to the IRP and the plan out in Arizona. Just given it seems pretty robust, how are you guys thinking about investment recovery there and the potential for using any existing mechanisms or getting anything approved that could accelerate that, just particularly given what we've seen play out in the current pending rate case? It's taken a while and has led to some lag. So anything you're thinking about on that front?
David? Yes. Michael, I'll jump right in. Yes, we're thinking about a couple of different mechanisms and evaluating exactly which one will work best for us and what to propose to our commission. But it's early days in the formulation period.
We've got a lot of stuff on the whiteboard around it, but really don't have anything ready for prime time yet.
And David, maybe you could chat about a little bit about how committed it seems like the commission is to obviously having a much higher renewable standards. So there's a lot of alignment for what people want to happen in Arizona, right?
Yes, that's right, Barry. As we sit here today, the Arizona Corporation Commission this week will be talking about new energy rules. And as part of that process, we'll be looking at changing the way that we do the integrated resource planning process, perhaps changing I'm sure it will change the renewable portfolio standards. There have been a lot of discussion, there are staff reports out there, commissioner proposals, etcetera, that folks will be going through. They're obviously going to be focused on the affordability and reliability side of the equation.
But at the end of the day, in order to get a lot of renewables into our system, we need to have a better and more, I'll say, a quicker regulatory recovery mechanism, so that we're all on the same page and that we can reach those goals. So yes, everybody is pulling in the same direction. We're just really trying to figure out exactly the details from a regulatory perspective, from a rules perspective on how we're going to get there. And again, I can't say this enough is making sure that the reliability and affordability of our service remains the main concern for us, our customers and the commission.
Great. And then my second question was just, Barry, I think you said a little earlier, still liking the Alberta business even though the growth has slowed a little bit. Does that opinion change at all if this transmission rate based proceeding goes against you? And maybe just as an add on to that, thinking more broadly, any other parts of the portfolio of businesses that may not make sense, if there's a good price?
Hey, as a big public company, we always have to be open to if some other folks feel our businesses are worth a lot of money, open to those discussions and we will always be that way. I think Alberta, if we get a bad decision on the transmission, I am hoping that doesn't happen. I will be really, really disappointed. We just double down and do our jobs in Arizona in Alberta. It's a good business.
It's got 500,000 customers, over 1,000,000 poles in its system, but it's a Gary, 100,000 kilometers of line. It's a massive piece of distribution in Canada and we will keep doing our jobs, but we're hopeful that we will come out on the right side of it.
Great. Thanks a lot.
Our next question comes from the line of Elias Foscolos of Industrial Alliance. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning. First of all, I'd like to congratulate both Barry and David.
Thank you. Thank you.
Just looking at the capital spending profile,
it looks to
me like Tilbury Phase 2 is, of course, not in there. But does that represent potentially the biggest opportunity that's not sort of visible at the moment?
David, do you want to take that one?
Yes, I'll take that one. Yes, that is probably the biggest single project. There's obviously a lot of other projects that are not in there like Lake Erie Connector, etcetera. But that one has probably the biggest single potential for adding and expanding our capital budget.
Okay. And with that one and that specific one in mind, what would be sort of the key factors to sort of bring that in? Would it be sort of longer term contracts and approvals? I guess that just some confirmation on that.
Yes, I'll jump right in on that one. That's exactly right. You need those long term contracts to build the level of infrastructure that's needed for a large LNG facility. And so of course, you also need the environmental assessments, permits, etcetera, that go along with it. So those are both huge topics and the subject of much discussion and planning currently in the BC team.
Okay. And one sort of last high level thing maybe for you, David. Barry talked about looking back and the acquisition of ITC as being something that he sort of points to. If we can kind of fast forward and then look back and I'll try to keep this to a financial perspective, would you be in 5, 10 years from now, would you be saying potentially, I would be really happy if the organic growth that we were able to pull out of the asset base, acquisitions, a combination or something else?
Yes. I think the number one thing, of course, that we're focused on now is organic growth. 5 to 10 years from now looking back and if there happens to be a great opportunity for additional acquisitions, we'll jump on them. I should back up and say I was a little hurt. I thought Barry would say UNS Energy was a
That's too Dave, that's too.
Technically he wasn't quite CEO at the time, but it sure felt like
a Berry
transaction. Yes, so it's going to depend. We're always looking for great opportunities out there to add shareholder value. We think right now the best way for us to do that is growing our utilities in the regulated space. And 5 to 10 years from now, we'll have the conversation on the look back like Barry is doing now.
Great. That's it for me. Thank you very much.
Thank you. As there are no further questions, I would like to turn the call back to Ms. Amaimo for any closing remarks.
Thank you, Chris. We have nothing further at this time. Thank you for participating in our 5 year outlook conference call. Please contact Investor Relations should you need anything further. Thank you for your time and have a great day.