Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Imperial Oil Q2 2021 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session, and instructions will follow at that time. I would then like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Dave Hughes, Vice President of Investor Relations, p lease go ahead.
Thank you, Grace. Good morning, everybody. Thanks for joining us on our second quarter earnings call. I'm here today with Brad Corson, Chairman, President, and CEO. As usual with Brad is the senior management team, Dan Lyons, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Simon Younger, Senior Vice President of the Upstream, John Whelan, Vice President of the Downstream, and Sherri Evers, Vice President of Commercial and Corporate Development. First thing I need to do is read the cautionary statement. Today's comments include reference to non-GAAP financial measures. The definitions and reconciliations of these measures can be found in attachment six of our most recent press release and available on our website with the linked conference call. Today's comments may also contain forward-looking information.
Any forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance, actual future financial and operating results can differ materially depending on a number of factors and assumptions. Forward-looking information and the risk factors and assumptions are described in further detail in our second quarter earnings press release that we issued earlier this morning, as well as our most recent Form 10-K. All of those documents are available on SEDAR, EDGAR, and on our website. I would ask you to please refer to those. We're following our usual format today. Brad's going to start out offering some opening remarks, then Dan's going to provide a financial update, then we'll go back to Brad for operational update, following which we'll go into the Q&A session. With that, I'll turn it over to Brad.
Thank you, Dave, and good morning, everybody, and welcome to our second quarter 2021 earnings call. I hope each of you and your families are doing well and continuing to stay healthy. It's great to see the high levels of both first and second vaccinations we are achieving here in Canada and the significant reduction in case counts across the country. Hopefully, this is bringing some sense of normalcy back to all of our lives, which is desperately needed. However, we do recognize we're not out of the woods yet, given what we are seeing globally and here in Canada with respect to the variants. Think about how to best characterize the second quarter. First, on the market side, we saw another quarter of increasing commodity prices, but with continued slow recovery in demand. From an operational perspective, we continue to deliver very strong performance.
As we talked about on our first quarter call, we had plans to execute a significant amount of maintenance this quarter. I'm pleased to say this maintenance was executed successfully, and now that most of our scheduled downtime is behind us, we are in great shape heading into the second half of the year. This is especially exciting as we've seen many of the pandemic-related restrictions in Canada lifted and are looking forward to seeing a more pronounced recovery in demands. I'm very pleased with the strong execution of our plans and the subsequent results this quarter. Likewise, I'm very excited about the momentum we're now carrying into the second half of the year. Over the next few minutes, Dan and I will detail the results of what was a very strong second quarter for us.
Now let's turn more specifically to those second quarter results. Earnings for the quarter were CAD 366 million, and our cash from operating activities was CAD 852 million, both down slightly from the first quarter, but very much as expected, given our turnaround activities. We saw improvements in crude prices through the quarter, although our ability to fully capture this improved market environment was impacted by the high level of turnaround activities that I mentioned. We’ve delivered a strong first half in 2021, underpinned by the actions we took last year and are building on this year to maximize the value of our existing assets. Not only was our operating cash flow in the quarter higher than in the second quarter of 2020, it was actually higher than all four quarters of 2020 combined.
Our upstream continues to perform very well, and I will talk more about each asset in a few minutes, but I want to take just a moment now to highlight a major milestone we have achieved at Kearl. I'm excited to let you know that we are implementing a new strategy this year to extend intervals between turnarounds at Kearl. Consequently, we will only have single annual turnaround starting this year, which we just completed, instead of the two we have typically had in the past. The Kearl turnaround that was originally planned for September, October this year has now been canceled. While we have been talking for some time about our intention to make this change, I'm pleased to say we are delivering this a year ahead of schedule.
This is due to the progress we have made on our multi-year reliability improvement plans and specifically the work we've been doing to prepare for this capability over the last several years. Kearl's demonstrated performance gives us the confidence to accelerate our plans. It's this type of performance that underpins our strong cash flow generation, which in turn supports our focus on shareholder returns. During the second quarter of 2021, Imperial returned over CAD 1.3 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividend payments. This compares to just over CAD 900 million for all of 2020. In June, the company announced the renewal of its share repurchase program, allowing us to repurchase up to 5% of our outstanding shares over a 12-month period ending on June 28th, 2022. I would also like to briefly highlight the launch of the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero Alliance.
Imperial is very proud to be one of the five founding members of the alliance, which combine to account for around 90% of Canada's oil sands production. As a group, we are committed to working together, along with our federal and provincial government counterparts, with a goal to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions from oil sands operations by 2050. This level of emissions reduction is clearly a significant task we have facing us, and we are looking forward to working together with our industry and government partners to overcome this challenge. It's also a further example of why Canada continues to be the best place globally to produce oil. As we have talked about in the past, Canada continues to lead all major reserve holders in all three aspects of ESG, environmental, social, and governance.
This unprecedented alliance serves to further underscore how important Canada is as a producing nation and the role we play on the global stage. First phase of this foundational project, a major carbon capture, utilization, and storage trunk line connected to a carbon sequestration hub, which will enable multi-sector tie-in projects for expanded emissions reductions. This is only the start, and we believe that through collaboration, Canada has what it takes to be the responsible energy provider to the world. With that, I'll now turn it over to Dan to go through our financial performance for the quarter in more detail.
Thanks, Brad. Getting into the financial results for the quarter, our net income in the second quarter was CAD 366 million, up CAD 892 million from the second quarter of 2020, or up almost CAD 1.2 billion when looking at earnings excluding identified items. This increase was driven primarily by stronger upstream realizations and volumes, and by stronger margins in the downstream and chemicals. Now looking sequentially, our second quarter net income of CAD 366 million is down CAD 26 million from the first quarter of this year, as higher realizations in the upstream were more than offset by the impact of significant turnaround activity at Kearl, Syncrude and Strathcona, which together reduced earnings by about CAD 400 million, as well as weaker realized margins in the downstream.
Looking at each business line, the upstream recorded net income of CAD 247 million, up about CAD 170 million from the first quarter's net income of CAD 79 million, driven by higher realizations, partly offset by lower volumes as a result of turnarounds at Kearl and Syncrude. Downstream's net income was CAD 60 million in the second quarter, down from CAD 292 million in the first quarter, with the lower earnings reflecting the impact of a 55-day turnaround at Strathcona, along with lower realized margins driven by timing impacts. Our chemicals business demonstrated continued strong performance in the second quarter, earning CAD 109 million compared to net income of CAD 67 million in the first quarter, making the second quarter of this year the highest quarterly results for our chemical business in over 30 years. These strong results continue to be driven by higher margins. Moving on to cash flow.
In the second quarter, we generated CAD 852 million in cash flows from operating activities or CAD 893 million excluding working capital effects. Despite the execution of three major turnarounds, our free cash flow in the second quarter was CAD 645 million, bringing our free cash flow for the year to just over CAD 1.5 billion, up CAD 2.4 billion from last year. These strong cash flows enabled us to return over CAD 1.3 billion to shareholders in the second quarter, mainly via share buybacks, while still ending the quarter with a cash balance of almost CAD 800 million. Looking ahead, with our major turnarounds complete, strong commodity prices, improving product demand, and continued capital discipline, we are well positioned to generate substantial free cash flow over the remainder of the year. Now moving on to CapEx.
Capital expenditures in the second quarter totaled CAD 259 million, up about CAD 100 million from the first quarter, reflecting a continued ramp up in activity, including increased spend related to the Sarnia Products Pipeline in the downstream and the Kearl in-pit tailings project in the upstream. Consistent with our previous guidance, we continue to expect capital expenditures for the year to be about CAD 1.2 billion as spending continues to ramp up on the Sarnia Products Pipeline and the Kearl in-pit tailings projects and as we increase spending on volume sustainment at Cold Lake. As well as mine progression and efficiency projects at Kearl, including converting additional trucks to autonomous haul and recovering heat from boiler flue gas. Shifting to shareholder distributions.
As I previously mentioned, we returned over CAD 1.3 billion to shareholders in the second quarter, repurchasing about 29.4 million or 4% of our outstanding shares for about CAD 1.2 billion in May and June. Paying CAD 160 million in dividends in April at CAD 0.22 per share. On June 23rd, we announced that we would be renewing our share repurchase program as of June 29th to repurchase up to 5% or about 35.6 million of our outstanding shares over the following 12 months. In early July, we paid our second quarter dividend of CAD 0.27 per share, an increase of around 23% from the first quarter dividend. Earlier today, we announced that we will pay a third quarter dividend of CAD 0.27 per share on October one. These actions demonstrate our confidence in the future and are consistent with our long-standing commitment to return surplus cash to shareholders.
Now I'll turn it back to Brad to discuss our operational performance.
Thanks, Dan. Now, let me talk about our operational performance in the second quarter. Upstream production averaged 401,000 oil equivalent barrels a day in the second quarter, which was up 54,000 bpd versus the second quarter of 2020. This represents our highest second quarter production in over 25 years. The increase was a result of very strong operating performance. Although we were in the very early stages of the pandemic in the second quarter of last year, and we're taking steps to manage production levels in a highly volatile market environment at that time, it's also notable that the second quarter of this year was a quarter where we had significant planned maintenance. Production was down 31,000 oil equivalent barrels per day versus the first quarter of 2021, mainly due to the significant turnaround activity at Syncrude.
I'll now talk in more detail about each asset, starting with Kearl. As you may recall, last quarter's Kearl production set a best ever mark for the first quarter, and that strong performance continued through the second quarter. Kearl is really delivering now. Total gross production was 255,000 bpd , which is actually up 4,000 bpd from the first quarter of 2021. This is not only the best second quarter production throughout Kearl's history, but also the second-best quarterly production ever for any quarter at this asset. What makes this even more impressive is that these records were achieved during a quarter with a major turnaround. A turnaround that was completed on time and on budget during a challenging period in the Wood Buffalo region due to the pandemic. The highest production quarter was the fourth quarter of 2020, which was a quarter with no turnaround.
I would also note that eight of the last nine months have been individual monthly production records for Kearl. The exception was May of this year, which was just short of the previous best ever May by around 3,000 bpd due to the turnaround this year. I would say, though, I look forward to next May when we'll take another shot at that record. At 311,000 bpd in June is now the highest production month on record for Kearl. As of yesterday, July 29th, Kearl's production for the month has averaged just over 290,000 bpd , which puts us on track for another monthly record for the month of July. This strong performance just continues. This is the point at which I would normally be providing some comments on the second annual turnaround at Kearl.
As I mentioned earlier, we won't be having one this fall. Moving to a single turnaround per year, effectively doubling the maintenance intervals, is something we've been talking about for a long while as a key part of our journey to 280,000 bpd . At our Investor Day last November, we indicated that we would be taking this step in 2022. Advancing these plans by a full year is a testament to all of the work the Kearl team has done over the last few years as part of our overall reliability improvement strategy. With this in mind, and as a result of the strong performance the asset continues to demonstrate, today, we are raising our Kearl annual production guidance for 2021 to 265,000 total gross barrels per day, which represents an increase of 10,000 total gross barrels per day relative to our earlier guidance.
I want to take a minute to talk about unit cash costs at Kearl, which continue to be a positive story as well. We've talked about a target unit cash cost of U.S. $20/bbl all in at Kearl, highlighted that we were very close to reaching this target late last year and with a firm commitment for this year. We continue to focus on reducing our operating costs and are making great progress. Unit costs are down year- to- date, almost CAD 3.50/bbl versus 2020. However, I would also note that while the strong Canadian dollar is creating some pressure on this U.S. dollar equivalent, we continue to target U.S. $20/bbl for full year 2021. I'm also pleased to report the start-up of the first boiler flue gas heat recovery unit at Kearl.
This technology will allow us to recover heat from boiler exhaust and use it to pre-heat process water. This is exciting, as not only does this provide operating cost reductions, but it is also estimated to reduce emissions by up to the equivalent of 30,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide. That's on a single boiler. We have five additional boilers that we plan to apply this technology to as we continue to take steps to reduce the greenhouse gas intensity of our operations. This is a great example of emissions reductions efforts that also deliver value to the bottom line. Now let's talk about Cold Lake. Cold Lake had another strong quarter as well, with production of 142,000 bpd . This is up 2,000 bpd versus the first quarter and up 19,000 bpd versus the second quarter of 2020.
The second quarter of 2020 had a high level of planned maintenance, whereas we had relatively light maintenance activity in the second quarter of this year, as I mentioned on our first quarter call. While this accounts for a large part of the year-on-year increase we realized, the improved reliability and optimizations we made at Cold Lake are also contributing to the strong performance. Given this strong performance, full-year production is now expected to be 135,000 bpd , an increase of 5,000 bpd over our prior guidance. I will also note that we do have some additional minor planned maintenance at the Mahkeses plant in the third quarter at Cold Lake and would estimate the production impact to be around 2,000 bpd over the quarter. Now moving to Syncrude.
Imperial's share of Syncrude average production was 47,000 bpd in the second quarter. This was down 32,000 bpd versus the first quarter and down 3,000 bpd versus the second quarter of 2020. This drop is due to the large turnaround on one of the cokers at Syncrude during the quarter. By comparison, Syncrude did not have a turnaround in the first quarter of this year. Recall the turnaround originally planned for the second quarter of 2020 was deferred due to the pandemic and did not start until later in June. Specific to the turnaround, most of the major work was completed within the second quarter and impacted most of the quarter.
As you recall, we talked on the first quarter call about the COVID-19 outbreak in Wood Buffalo at that time, and I would note this did impact the turnaround to some extent. The outbreak necessitated executing the work with a reduced workforce, so there was an impact to the duration. The turnaround was completed in 95 days versus an original plan of around 80 days. On a very positive note, I would also highlight that the asset did leverage the new interconnecting pipeline between Syncrude and Suncor's base plant to allow the export of bitumen for the first time in the asset's history in late June, which helped mitigate some of the impact of the extended turnaround. As we look forward, there is no more turnaround maintenance planned for the asset for the rest of the year, so we would expect to see strong production going forward.
The owners continue to focus on the transfer of operatorship and still expect this to be complete by the fourth quarter. Just for completeness, I would note that there are no changes to the production guidance for Syncrude. Now let's move to the downstream. We refined an average of 332,000 bpd in the second quarter, which was down 32,000 bpd versus the first quarter, but up 54,000 bpd versus the second quarter of last year. Utilization in the quarter was 78%, which was down from 85% in the first quarter, but up from 66% in the second quarter of 2020. The higher utilization versus the second quarter of 2020 is reflective of the demand recovery we have seen since last year. The lower utilization versus the first quarter of this year is due to the major planned turnaround at our Strathcona refinery.
This turnaround started in early April and was completed on schedule and on budget by the end of May and had an overall impact on throughput of about 70,000 bpd in the quarter. I would also highlight that Strathcona represents almost 50% of our refining capacity in the country, a turnaround of this magnitude does have an impact on the downstream financial results. In addition, while on average, Western Canada saw some stronger industry margins in the second quarter, the margins were lower in June, which was when Strathcona completed their turnaround and resumed full production. This impacted our ability to fully capture the stronger industry margins in the quarter. To give you an idea of where we are now, after the successful completion of the Strathcona turnaround, overall refinery capacity utilization has increased to around 93% in the month of June.
Looking forward, we do have some further planned maintenance activity later this year, but not on the same scale as the second quarter. This specifically involves a small turnaround at our Nanticoke refinery starting in mid-September and running until late October, but this is expected to have a small impact on utilization and margins in the quarter. Petroleum product sales in the second quarter were 429,000 bpd , up 15,000 bpd from the first quarter and up 72,000 bpd versus the second quarter of 2020. The improved sales in both cases are driven by strengthening demands as the country eases many of the pandemic-related restrictions. Although the second quarter for Canada was still limited by the pandemic and associated lockdowns.
As of June though, we were seeing industry fuel demands around 90% of normal for gasoline, jet fuel around 50%, which is a significant improvement versus prior quarters. Now with diesel remaining close to historical levels. Looking forward, we expect to see continued strengthening in the demand for motor gasoline. Most jurisdictions in Canada have effectively lifted their lockdowns, and Canada has now surpassed the U.S. in administering first and second vaccine doses. We fully expect that this, along with the fact we are now in the summer driving season, will result in a further increase in gasoline demand in the quarter. Finally, we also launched the redesigned Synergy Supreme premium gasoline at Esso stations across the country. This is very exciting as this new formulation will help keep engines three times cleaner and also offers enhanced engine protection.
Our chemical business continued its outstanding performance as well, delivering an impressive CAD 109 million in earnings in the second quarter, the highest quarterly earnings in over 30 years. This also represents a significant increase of CAD 42 million versus the first quarter of 2021 and CAD 102 million higher than the second quarter of last year. Chemical volumes have continued to stay strong, as have margins, which continue to be impacted by supply challenges and demand strength in North America. To sum it up, before we move to the Q&A session, the second quarter once again demonstrated Imperial's resilience by delivering strong financial and operating performance in a quarter where we had a significant amount of planned maintenance.
That strong performance underpins the increase in our annual production guidance by 15,000 total gross barrels per day, as well as our ability to return material amounts of cash to our shareholders. I would also reiterate our ongoing focus on cost discipline and long-term structural enhancements. While the last year and a half has been marked by a high degree of market volatility, our attention on what we can control has ensured that we continue to maximize shareholder value. I'm looking forward to continuing along this path as the year moves forward. With that, I'm going to turn it back to Dave to facilitate the Q&A session, t hank you.
Okay, thanks, Brad. As usual, we had a few questions pre-submitted. I think I'll start by going to a couple of them. First question comes from Phil Gresh at J.P. Morgan. One of your oil sands peers referenced approximately 10% inflation risks on CapEx. What are you seeing here? From an activity level perspective, how are you thinking about any potential changes to your plans from last year's Investor Day, given the higher prices? Are you seeing any OpEx inflation headwinds?
Thanks for that question, Phil, and let me first comment on CapEx and then I'll comment on OpEx. We do see some pressure from inflation, particularly on steel prices, but it's really not having a significant impact on our overall operating and capital plans given the nature of our projects, our current activity levels, and really our ability to find offsets. For example, one of our key capital projects is the Sarnia Products Pipeline, which by its nature has a lot of steel associated with it. Here we've already purchased most of the pipe and valves required for that project. We really have limited exposure at this point to inflationary pressures. Another major project for us, capital project, is our Kearl in-pit tailings project. That project mostly involves earthworks. There's really limited pressure caused by steel inflation, and not really material.
Now shifting a little bit to operating costs, I think it is fair to say that we are seeing higher energy costs, driven by natural gas pricing, and especially compared to a year ago. That is impacting some of our costs. When you set that aside, actually our company-wide operating costs are essentially flat with the first half of last year.
Okay, Phil had a follow-up. What's your latest thinking on temporary versus permanent OpEx savings relative to the billion dollars you took out in 2020?
Well, thanks again for that question, Phil. Maybe just building a little bit on my earlier comment on OpEx and inflation. First, just to remind you and everyone, last year, we were able to reduce our operating costs by about a billion dollars versus the prior year. What we've said over the course of last year was that about 50% of that cost savings was structural, and the other 50% were more temporary or one-off type impacts. As we moved into this year, we had a very strong focus on trying to maintain that full CAD 1 billion of savings. Where there were things that were temporary or one-off in nature, we are working hard to offset them in all parts of our business. I'm quite pleased that we are making progress on that.
As I said, other than some of the pressures we're seeing from energy costs, especially on fuel gas purchases, other than that, we are maintaining pretty flat levels of cost versus last year, which is a significant achievement. Then, of course, also important to keep in mind that while we're keeping those costs flat, we have been raising our upstream production. So when you look at unit cost trends, those are continuing on the downward trajectory that we talked about at Investor Day and continues to be core to our strategy to maximize value of our existing assets.
Okay, o perator, can we move over to the live Q&A line now, please?
Sure, a lso, I just want a quick reminder. In order to ask a question, please press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Dennis Fong from CIBC World Markets. Your line is open, sir.
Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking the questions. The first one really relates to Kearl. Obviously, you guys have showcased a lot of good work there, driving stronger throughput in production. Just referencing back to 2019 and 2020 Investor Days, you outlined, I think it was six items that could help drive production levels to 280,000 bpd . In one of the previous conference calls, you kind of indicated that some of those initiatives have already been completed, which seems like part of the driving factor to raising full-year guidance at Kearl. I was just curious as to what some of the remaining incremental projects you have left to help drive you to that 280,000 bpd , given your accelerated timeline of kind of switching to one turnaround a year.
Thanks for that question. I appreciate your recognition of the great progress we're making on our journeys at Kearl. I must say, no pun intended, but Kearl is a rock star for us. They just continue to deliver in so many ways ranging from reliability improvements, other volume enhancements, cost reduction initiatives, a whole range of things. As you point out, we laid out a core strategy to enable us to ultimately achieve 280,000 bpd over a several year timeframe, and there were many projects underpinning that. A couple that are still very much a focus of ours involve some further debottlenecking of our equipment there at Kearl, which will allow higher throughputs. We're also continuing some mining and resource optimization activities. Digital is still a key focus area for us.
There are still more initiatives that we're very focused on to get us to 280,000 bpd . As you're also seeing, we're accelerating that plan. Being able to raise our guidance to 265,000 bpd obviously puts us much closer to 280,000 bpd. I look forward to our November Investor Day, and we'll give you an update on the timeline to get to 280,000 bpd. Rest assured, it's going to be quicker than what we've projected in the past, t hanks for the question.
Great, t hanks. Just one quick follow-up here. Just shifting over to capital allocation. Obviously, you've outlined multiple ways that you're returning cash back to shareholders through the share buyback program and your dividend, as well as continuing on a core-focused capital program, which is looking at optimizing essentially your base production and kind of carrying that through this year. Obviously, given the stronger oil price environment, you're looking to pay back a significant amount of debt just because there are no other options at the time being for allocating capital. How are you thinking about just that thought process? What do you think is an appropriate capital structure, and what are the other alternatives that you're looking at with respect to capital allocation? Thanks.
Yeah, good question. Dan's here, I'm going to let Dan talk about kind of our approach to capital allocation and our view as the best use of cash. I would say, just before I turn it over to him, that we do not necessarily view it as a priority to pay down debt. We do believe there's better uses of our capital, I'll let Dan talk about that.
Yeah, I mean, our debt levels are low, on an absolute basis relative to our peers. The cost is low. It's always an option, but as Brad said, it's not a priority. As we've said at various Investor Days and other things, and pretty consistently, we remain committed to returning surplus cash to shareholders. Obviously, if you look at today's commodity prices, I kind of talked a little bit about in my comments and the production levels we have going forward, we hope to see very strong cash generation. We start, as always, with a reliable and growing dividend, our go-to. After that, the NCIB. We just completed the 4% amendment over a couple of months, and now we have the new one we launched for 5% over the next 12 months. We still could grow cash balances significantly net of all that, right?
As we've said before, our commitment to return surplus cash remains. We have to look at other methods of share buyback. We have to look at special dividends. We haven't made any decisions in that area. I think the key message is we are committed to return surplus cash.
Thanks for those questions, o perator?
Okay, g oing on, we have your next question from Greg Pardy from RBC Capital Markets, y our line is open, sir.
Thanks, g ood morning, and thanks, as always, for the very thorough rundown. Most of my questions have been answered, I guess I wanted to come back to the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero, of which you're a part of the quintet. Brad, what's most important in your mind in terms of milestones that we should be looking for? You've come out with this in early June. There's a consultation period underway. How should we sort of grade performance here and perhaps over what timeline?
Yeah, t hanks for the question, Greg. The Pathways to Net Zero alliance and our objectives there are a very high priority for us as a company and more collectively, five of us on behalf of our industry. The undertaking is huge. It's complex. It's going to require a lot of collaboration and support. Right now, we're very focused on, first of all, defining the optimum, if you will, technical solutions, what the base project will entail. We're leveraging all of the five companies' strengths there. We're also in parallel working with provincial and federal governments to define the nature of support that we will need from them, both in terms of fiscal support for the project, certainty around our investments, and also access to port space along the pipeline and where we see some sequestration hubs.
In the near term, I think between now and the end of the year, that's the focus is on defining what that kind of level of support involves and then also marrying that up with all of the physical elements of the project. I'll tell you, in terms of where does this fit into our priority, for myself and the other four CEOs, we are meeting on a very regular basis, in most cases once a week. We all have our own teams that are working together, and they're meeting multiple times a week. This is a huge undertaking for us. It's obviously a multi-year, multi-decade project. Critically important that we get it set up right here in the very early months, t hat's what we're working on.
Understood.
Hope that helps.
Thanks very much. As always, yeah, thanks very much, Brad.
Okay, t hank you.
Thank you, y our next question comes from the line of Neil Mehta from Goldman Sachs, y our line is open, sir.
Thank you, Brad, this question might be premature, and I recognize that it is a board decision, but you brought up the comment around the special dividend, which given the cash flow generation that I would think you'd have in the back half of the year at the forward curve, becomes a real possibility. As you think about the potential for special dividends, what do you think the positive cases and what do you think the risks are to the idea? We've seen it employed in a couple of different ways. Some have done it in a codified framework through a variable construct, and some have opportunistically provided fixed special dividends. I thought I'd just create a forum for you to weigh in here on anything that is relevant as it relates to the concept.
Yeah, t hanks for the question, Neil. You're right, a s we look through the rest of the year, we do think we're gonna be in a very strong cash position, and we're gonna be, I think, faced with some really positive choices. Between ourselves as a management team and certainly with the Board, we continue to reflect on those and talk about what is the best way to deliver value to our shareholders. I'll maybe pause there and give Dan a chance to comment maybe on some of the particulars.
Yeah, t hanks, Brad. Neil, obviously, it's a good question. We don't have any particular religious philosophy on whether you do special dividends or buybacks or even this variable div you kind of referred to. I think what we hear from our major shareholders, indeed equity analysts, is there's really a preference for a reliable and growing dividend. I think that could change. If the preferences of the market change and our shareholders, we can always think about that and going to some other method of variable or what have you, but we're pretty committed to reliable and growing dividend as consistent with what our shareholders want. The variable dividend is not something we're really pursuing at this point. It's more special dividends or share buybacks, and each has its pros and cons. We'll make that decision with the board as we go forward.
Thanks, guys. The second question is, capital spending in the first half of the year is clearly tracking well below your full-year guidance. How do you feel about the full-year number? Is there a downward bias to it? To the extent you still think you're on track for that level, remind us again what causes the acceleration and spend in the back half of the year.
Yeah, i t's a really good question. First, I would just summarize by saying, we continue to be focused on the capital plans we laid out at Investor Day, those underpin our guidance of CAD 1.2 billion for this year. We maintain confidence that we can achieve that. You're exactly right, w hen you look at the first half of the year, we've only spent probably 35% of that CAD 1.2 billion. We are tracking behind; we are aggressively ramping up activity on several large projects. When you look at second quarter compared to first quarter, you'll see a significant ramp-up, I forget, 40%, 50% or something. If you extrapolate that trend, I think that will give you kind of renewed confidence in our ability to get to that CAD 1.2 billion.
Within our project portfolio are multiple projects with their own individual timelines, and some of them just happen to be more heavily weighted towards the second half of the year. We have been actively ramping up construction activities for our Sarnia Products Pipeline. That's one of our largest projects in the downstream. On the upstream, we're actively ramping up our construction activities at Kearl with our tailings project. Those are two examples of where we expect to spend significantly more capital in the second half of the year relative to the first half of the year. Through all that, we continue to look for efficiencies, optimizations. We have a long track record of capital discipline. What's most important is achieving those projects within the timeline and achieving the ultimate objectives.
If we can do that for a slightly lower cost, actually, we want to do that. We're going to continue to look for that. Not with any compromise to the project objectives or timelines. I think we're going to be pretty close to that CAD 1.2 billion.
All right, t hanks, Brad.
Okay, Brad, we have a couple more that were pre-submitted, so I'm going to go to those right now. The first one comes from Menno Hulshof at TD. Can you quantify the impacts of the extension of the turnaround interval at Kearl in 2022 and beyond? Downtime, unit costs, turnaround costs, et cetera. Is the plan to apply this approach to other projects? If so, which ones and when?
Thanks for that question, Menno . When you think about turnarounds, I think, in Dan's remarks, he highlighted that in this last quarter, we had three major turnarounds. We had Kearl, we had Syncrude, we had Strathcona. The collective financial impact of those turnarounds was about CAD 400 million on our earnings. All that work was necessary. It underpins the long-term safety, integrity, reliability of our operations. To the extent we can figure out more effective ways to accomplish that work and extend intervals and do it at lower cost, well, that's a huge prize for us. That's what underpins this strategy at Kearl.
Specific to Kearl, when you look historically over the last few years at our turnarounds, a single turnaround will typically impact us somewhere around 10,000 bpd on an annual average, that turnaround will typically cost us CAD 50 million-CAD 70 million in costs. On top of that, there's the lost margin associated with those barrels. It's a priority focus for us. That's why it's so exciting that we can announce a one-year acceleration of those plans. It continues to be an ongoing focus for all of our turnaround activities. How can we reduce the timeline, reduce the financial impact? I would say that for our other assets, those plans and approaches are quite optimized. We've been working at those for many years, and so I don't think there's much applicability there.
Most of our other turnarounds are on a longer interval already. We're going to continue to look for more opportunities. Kearl's the big prize, and that's why so exciting to announce that today.
The next question is turnaround-related as well, in the downstream. It comes from Manav Gupta at Credit Suisse. Help us better understand the impact of downtime at Strathcona Refinery. How much was the throughput lower? What was the total expense of the turnaround, and what was the opportunity cost?
Yeah, t hanks. I appreciate why there's so much focus on the turnarounds. Same for us as for you. In terms of Strathcona, again, it's our largest refinery of the three that we have, representing about 50% of our refining capacity. That particular turnaround at Strathcona was 55-56 days in duration, so nearly two months of the quarter. Had a impact of about 70,000 bpd . The financial impact was around CAD 90 million in terms of both costs and margin impacts. A pretty significant impact to us, but again, one that is quite important for us to accomplish that work and now have it behind us as we look to the future.
Okay, w e have a question from Phil Skolnick, Eight Capital. How do your Montney assets fit with the corporate strategy?
Well, thanks for that question, Phil. Our corporate strategy is very much focused on maximizing the value of our existing assets. Thinking about major growth in the Montney is not a current priority for us. We have very purposely put our focus on our core oil sands assets and looking to further drive down costs, improving reliability, the low-cost debottlenecks. We've demonstrated our ability to generate significant value from that. Given that, we're continuing to, if you will, prioritize where the unconventional assets fit in our portfolio. There are elements of that asset that are performing very well, delivering a lot of value to us, and we're going to continue to advance some of those opportunities. I would say they're lower on our priority list relative to our core oil sands properties. We take a long-term view.
We've got a lot of acreage in the unconventional plays, we're going to continue to reflect on them, continue to update that opportunity space, see how it fits in the market, and we'll continue to keep those strategies current. For now, our priority is really on the oil sands.
Okay, we have one final question that was pre-submitted around the sustainability of chemical margins, and that came from Phil Gresh at J.P. Morgan. On chemicals, how are you thinking about the pace of margin normalization?
Well, first, I would just reiterate, it's a very strong quarter for chemicals. As I mentioned, CAD 109 million of net income, and that compares quite favorably to CAD 78 million of net income for all of 2020. Also compares quite favorably to CAD 108 million for all of 2019. A very strong quarter for us, the highest in 30 years. It's really being underpinned by a few fundamentals. First of all, we have an advantaged chemicals business. We've got a low cost, w e've got structural advantages driven by our integration with the Sarnia refinery, our access to readily available feedstocks, close proximity to key customers to market our products. All those things put us in an advantaged position. Then on top of that, though, what we've seen is some impacts from the winter storms down south and outages in some of the Gulf Coast facilities.
That's put pressure on the supply side of the market. As the economy is recovering from COVID, we're seeing an increased demand for polyethylene and consumer goods related to that. All those things together are creating a very strong market environment. As we look longer term into the second half of the year and approaching year-end, I do expect there'll be probably some normalization of pricing. Very difficult to speculate on what that's going to look like in terms of dollar per ton. Probably some normalization, kind of given some of those impacts are more seasonal in nature. Longer term, I think this is a very cyclical business. There will be new sources of supply coming on the market and all those things what will have an impact.
Again, we still feel very good about where we are and the advantages we have with our business. As we look even to the end of 2020, I think it's going to continue to be very strong for us. Okay, o perator, can I turn it back to you, please?
Sure, w e have a follow-up question from Dennis Fong from CIBC World Markets, y our line is open, sir.
Hey, thanks for taking my follow-up questions. I've got two here. One is just on the boiler flue gas project. You've rolled it out to one particular boiler and indicated there's five incremental that you can look at installing that new technology on. What's maybe the timeframe of that potential installation, as well as are there any other locations throughout your portfolio that you can look at applying that? Secondarily, if you wouldn't mind providing a bit of an update as to where you're at with respect to the Grand Rapids project, t hanks.
Yeah, f irst on the boiler flue gas, you're right. We've completed one. We have five additional ones that we are in the process of phasing into our Kearl operations. We would expect that it will take probably two to three years to complete all of those, because we need to time it with downtime on those pieces of equipment, and we want to be very orderly in the implementation. A very positive project as I mentioned, not only cost advantages but also emissions advantages. We look forward to implementing that, and it's part of our pathway to a 10% reduction in our greenhouse gas intensity between now and 2023. In terms of Grand Rapids, we have a lot of activity underway at Cold Lake.
I would say, more recently, we have shifted our focus to optimizing our existing assets at Cold Lake with some infield drilling and further optimization of production. That's driving those great volumes that you're seeing at Cold Lake, and the reason that we were able to increase our guidance by 5,000 bpd . That's been our priority in the near term, to accelerate volumes. We're keeping, obviously, a very clear line of sight on some longer-term project opportunities like Grand Rapids. We're continuing to pace that project in our portfolio. When we get to Investor Day, we'll give a more wholesome update. We've made progress on that project, and we continue to see that it's gonna add a lot of long-term value. Again, equally important is what we're doing with Nabiye and the base Cold Lake, which is also adding near-term volumes, which are very profitable right now.
Thank you.
Thank you. I am showing no further question at this time. I would like to turn the conference back to Mr. Dave Hughes for any closing remarks.
Okay, t hank you, operator. I guess that then concludes our second quarter earnings call. On behalf of the management team here, thank you very much for joining us today. If you have any further questions or wanna continue any discussions, please don't hesitate to reach out and contact the investor relations team. Thank you very much.
Thank you, la dies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining, y ou may now disconnect.