Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Kingaros Gold Corporation Second Quarter 2021 Results Conference Call and Webcast. Conference Call. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Chris Lippenheld, Vice President of Investor Relations.
Please go ahead.
Thank you and good morning. With us today, we have Paul Rollinson, President and CEO and Ken Roth Senior Leadership Andrew Freeborough, Paul Tomory and Jeff Gold. Before we begin, I would like to bring your attention to the fact that we will be
following the Q2 of 2019,
2021, the MD and A for the period ended June 30, 2021 and our most recently filed AIF, all of which are available on our website. I will now turn the call over to Paul.
Thanks, Chris, and thank you all for joining us today. While there continues to be challenges globally coming out of the pandemic, we are seeing signs of a return to normal across our operations. With the safety and well-being of our people as our top priority, we are maintaining our pandemic related protocols where needed. However, we are also benefiting from a continued return to more efficient operating practices wherever possible. Notably, with travel restrictions easing, we have been able to reach most of our sites more easily.
Before turning the call over to Andrea for a financial review and Paul for an operating review, I will comment briefly on situation at Tasiast, our return of capital plan and some highlights from the quarter. We realized the fire at Tasiast created a lot of uncertainty, which negatively impacted our stock price. Our objective today is to provide an update that helps remove this uncertainty. We needed the past several weeks to make mechanical inspections and based on this we do not believe is now reduced to not more than $35,000,000 And importantly, the gold is still in the ground and we have an insurance claim for the damages and the interruption to our business. Therefore, We do not see a fundamental change in the value of our business.
With respect to the 24 ks expansion, While the plant is down, we have been able to continue to mine and advance the project. We will begin 2022 with substantially more ore in stockpile, which further secures our ability to meet our production goals in 2022 and 2023 and now 24. I was recently in Mauritania and we visited Tasiast and met with senior government officials. On July 15, we signed the final agreement, filed, which provides enhanced certainty on the economics of Tasiast. Achieving this important reinforces our strong partnership with the government.
We appreciate we are appreciative of the strong support from the government, particularly as we work through the impact of the mill fire. We have a high degree of confidence in our strong production growth and increasing free cash flow over the next few years. In addition, The fact that we see no fundamental change in the value of the business coupled with our recent stock price performance makes now a a highly compelling time to begin the share buyback program that we announced last night. We see the buyback as a meaningful addition to our regular dividend as we are targeting to double the total cash we are allocating to returns over the next for 12 months. Moving on to the broader portfolio.
We are confident in our ability to meet our revised 2021 production guidance and our outlook to 2023, which sees us growing production to 2,900,000 ounces. With respect to the cost guidance, The setbacks we faced this year at Tasiast and Round Mountain on their own would not have taken us out of our from our original guidance range. However, combining these setbacks with higher gold prices and inflation has created a need to update our outlook on costs for the year. Importantly though, our margins remain strong and ahead of our original budget expectations. Andrea will provide more detail on our guidance update in a few moments.
Finally, I would like to highlight 2 other important recent developments. 1, we completed a scoping study at Manchow, filed, which confirms the value of the project. And 2, we published our 2020 Sustainability Report, and governance. Along with this, we also released our first climate report, which outlines our climate strategy. Notwithstanding our strong record on safety, which is our first priority, We were recently reminded that our work in this area is never done.
I'm saddened to report that in June We experienced a fatality at our Toronto mine in Ghana. The loss of 1 of our employees reinforces the need to continue focusing our efforts on enhancing safety and risk management systems across our global operations. I will now turn the call over to Andrea for a more detailed review of our financial results.
Thanks, Paul. I'll begin with financial highlights from the quarter, including highlights on our balance sheet, then provide some commentary on our updated outlook. Production during the quarter was approximately 538,000 ounces and sales were 548,000 ounces. Have paid. Cost of sales were $8.30 per ounce in Q2, which was up from the previous quarter and Q2 of last year due to lower production, higher operating waste mine at a number of our sites as expected of $10.69 per ounce were up compared to the previous quarter and Q2 of last year, primarily due to lower ounces sold and higher cost of sales.
Our adjusted net earnings of $157,000,000 and adjusted operating cash flow of $364,000,000 were down approximately 19% 13%, respectively, from the same quarter last year, also a result of the decrease in production and higher cost of sales. Moving to our balance sheet. Our cash position remains strong, and we finished the quarter with $676,000,000 of cash after repaying $500,000,000 of senior notes in June. We now have $1,250,000,000 of senior notes remaining with the next maturity date in March of 2024. Our net debt at the end of the quarter improved to approximately $780,000,000 Our trailing 12 month net debt to EBITDA ratio improved slightly and is now just under 0.4 times.
Our investment grade credit profile from the 3 major rating agencies has been further enhanced this year with Moody's moving us to a positive outlook in for Q1 followed by an upgrade from Fitch in Q2. In July, we extended the maturity date of our revolving credit to July 2026 returning to a 5 year term. Looking ahead to the remainder of the year, follow. As Paul mentioned, we're pleased to have put in place share buyback program. We expect to begin executing this program in the near future.
And based on where we sit today, we would expect to double our return of capital over the next 12 months through this program. In summary, our cash flow remains strong and our balance sheet continues to strengthen. We are well positioned to fund our growth over the next few years, while continuing to reduce our debt and increase our return of capital to shareholders. Turning to our updated outlook for 2021. I note that all figures I'll reference here are within our typical confidence range of plus or minus 5%.
Starting with cost of sales, we've increased our 2021 guidance from 7.90 to $8.30 per ounce. The increase is mainly due to the deferral of low cost ounces from Tasiast and higher gold prices resulting in higher royalty payments as well as emerging trends and inflation. We have also increased guidance for all in sustaining costs from $10.25 to $11.10 per ounce. This increase is the result of the higher for the cost of sales and the impact of sustaining CapEx overhead and other sustaining costs over fewer ounces of production resulting from the Tasiast fire. Our guidance for other operating expense is increasing from $150,000,000 to $285,000,000 The increase is due to 3 factors.
First, the Tasiast mill repairs are estimated to be up to $35,000,000
A portion
of this may end up being classified within CapEx, but for now we've made the allowance within other operating costs. 2nd, approximately $50,000,000 of non mining related operating costs incurred at Tasiast during the repair of the mill, including site G and A and third, approximately $50,000,000 of costs related to the wall remediation effort at Round Mountain. As a reminder, we will be pursuing the recovery of the Tasiast related costs as we work through the insurance process. For capital expenditures, we are maintaining our full year guidance of $900,000,000 Looking out beyond this year, follow. As Paul mentioned, we're confident in our production outlook of 2,700,000 and 2,900,000 ounces for 2022 2023, respectively.
With respect to cost, we'd like to provide some context on what we're seeing. At the time of our Q4 release, we had indicated that we expect The cost of sales in 2022 to decline and to be largely in line with 2020. Our business remains on track to benefit from higher production, which will favorably influence our per ounce cost metrics and we'll continue to monitor inflationary pressures. Some of these inflationary pressures may be temporary and others may not be. As we approach the end of this year and complete our from our strategic business planning and advance our budget process for 2022, we will be able to provide more details.
I'll now turn the call over to Paul Tomory.
Thank you, Andrea. I will provide a brief update on the impacts from COVID, followed by an update on our operations, projects and exploration programs. As Paul mentioned, COVID restrictions are generally lifting around the world and most of our operations are slowly returning to normal with some exceptions. Thanks to our employees, operating communities and most governments and our operations have performed very well throughout this pandemic. I'll begin by providing an update on the Tasiast Mill repairs.
Most importantly, over the last few days, the mill has been turned and we are now confident that the gearless motor drive, The trunnion bearings in the mill shell are in good shape. To note, we've included a link to a video of the mill restart test in our press release. Based on this, we are confident that the mill will restart in the 4th quarter. The new trommel screen has been ordered and anticipated delivery dates Following inflation of the trauma screen, we expect to be able to resume operations at full capacity essentially right away without a significant ramp up period. We remain confident in our ability to meet 2022 production targets as a high grade stockpile that we will build will be available at startup.
The 21 ks project is now 90% complete. Commissioning activities of the power plant have begun and we expect it to be operation in the late part of Q4. And we expect to reach 21,000 tons per day in the Q1 of 2022. Additionally, we are exploring weights shortened the time need to reach 24,000 tons per day by taking advantage of mill downtime to advance some of the project tie ins sooner. Moving to Brazil, Paracatu had a good first half overall.
The mine produced 151,000 ounces, an increase of 24,000 over Q1 due primarily to the timing of ounces processed through the mill. Higher cash costs compared with Q1 are attributed principally to an isolated incident about unplanned maintenance, inflationary pressures particularly on consumables, labor and diesel and higher power costs due to drought and the government's response to restricting hydropower generation, which has resulted in increased exposure to more expensive spot power purchases. On this issue, it's worth noting that while drought conditions are prevalent and affecting power generation, it is not impacting water balance of Paracatuil. In Russia, Kupol delivered another good quarter. Results were largely in line with Q1 as the transition to narrower vein mining continues to progress as planned.
We saw lower grades compared to previous quarter in Q2 of last year due to planned mine sequencing at Kupo combined with lower grade from Duvernay. We expect grades to stay around these levels for the remainder of the year. Turning to Nevada, at Round Mountain implementation of the revised mine plan is proceeding well and Q2 production was in line with our expectations. The relocation of the waste pile at the top of the pit continued during the quarter and should be completed next month. Fortunately, this historic waste pile proved to be mineralized covering the cost of the re handling.
Mitigation efforts have stabilized the wall and significant progress has been made on further dewatering. The overall optimization study including opportunities for the Phase S pushback is progressing well and on schedule to be completed early next year. Production was lower quarter over quarter as a result of our focus on mitigating the wall instability, while costs were largely in line. Turning to our other operations, Fort Knox performed well during the Q2 as production increased compared to Q1 due to an increase in ounces recovered from new Barns Creek heap leach. Cash costs remained high due to higher operating waste mine, The decrease year over year due to more ounces produced from the new heap leach.
Bald Mountain's production was lower compared from the previous quarter due to the timing of ounces recovered from the heat as we mined through some carbonaceous material in the Vantage pit at the beginning of the quarter. We expect stronger production in the second half. Higher cash costs compared to previous quarter were due to lower production and higher fuel costs. Toronto has also delivered a good performance so far this year. Production was slightly lower than Q1 mainly due to lower grades from the underground mine, largely in line year over year and the mine continues to generate positive cash flow.
Moving on to our projects, as Paul mentioned, the Mencho Scoping study was completed this quarter on schedule. The results confirm the project is low risk, low cost, high grade, high return addition to our Fort Knox mine. Many of the key metrics in the study remain comparable to our views from the acquisition, including grades, recoveries, life of mine production of approximately 1,000,000 ounces with first production expected in 2024. Capital cost estimates, however, have increased by approximately $50,000,000 to approximately $150,000,000 on a 100% basis. The increase is largely due to strategic decisions that are expected to derisk the project and improve operational efficiencies, including reducing the use of contractors.
In addition, a better understanding of the project site conditions, particularly to photography and environment contributed to this increased capital. The project is moving to an FS and we expect to report those results by the end of 2022. Our other projects are advancing well. Development work on the Gill satellite pits located approximately 15 kilometers east of Fort Knox is proceeding as planned and is on track for 1st production later this year. La Coipa remains on budget and on track for 1st production in mid-twenty 2 with fleet refurbishments now complete.
Pre stripping, plant refurbishment and mine road construction are also progressing very well. The Lobo Marte FS is on schedule for completion in Q4 of this year, while permitting and community relations continue to advance. Udin's PFS is still expected to be completed by year end in support of Infrastructure work at site has commenced, including the establishment of camp facilities. 1st production of units is still anticipated in 2025. With respect to exploration across the company, we continue to focus on promising targets around current operations and areas where existing infrastructure can be leveraged with the goal of extending mine life and adding to our mineral reserve and resource estimates.
At Kupol, the exploration program targeting mine life extension is proceeding as planned. Targets at the 7th end of the cupola vein were tested, intersecting narrow but high grade veins. Importantly, exploration cancer established at Cayenne Maiwam and Kaverlyanskaya within the Kupol synergy zone, yielding high grade results in both areas. At Serrano, promising results during the first half of the year were in Canada as we continue to target multiyear mine life extensions and additions to its mineral resource estimates at year end. Underground resource upgrade and definition drilling at Surontano Located additional high grade pods and underground drilling was carried out at Serah, Akodi South and Tano and surface drilling at the Manau West ore body.
Development of an exploration drift to provide optimized drilling positions to target the overall high grade plunging chute is ongoing and is expected to be completed in the Q3. The results of the first hold exceeded expectations with mineralized width greater than previously interpreted. Drilling at Akati South has extended known mineralization to the immediate south of the reserve area, while at Tano, 2 minuteeralized west slates have been identified. At Uddinsk, exploration activities focus on infill drilling and completing the PFS geotechnical work. Additionally, on the larger Chulbacan property, exploration drilling has commenced 2 to 5 kilometers to the northeast of the Uvinsk resource pit along the principal Chulbacan fault where mineralization has been encountered.
At Round Mountain, exploration activities at Phase X focus on infill drilling and extending the known mineralization. We also work to improve the geologic model and assess mine planning options with a goal of delineating high grade material for potential underground mining and results continue to be encouraging. Lastly, at curlew, Exploration activities continue to target incremental high margin ounces proximal to the K2 and K5 deposits by constructing a series of exploration drifts to explore the highly prospective area. Rehabilitation development is ahead of schedule with underground drilling to commence in the 3rd quarter and continue well into next year. To wrap up on operations and projects, our priorities continue to be the health and safety of our employees, our social license to operate in the well-being of our communities and stakeholders, delivering strong consistent operating results and delivering our projects on time and on budget.
And with that, I'll turn the call back to Paul. Thanks, Paul.
In summary, We are making excellent progress on our key initiatives and our business remains in a strong position. The Tasiast Mill is expected to be running in Q4. Despite the setbacks at Tasiast and Round Mountain, we expect both assets to be strongly repositioned for the future. Our investment grade balance sheet will continue to strengthen as we grow our production of free cash flow over the coming years and our shares remain highly attractive and we are initiating a buyback program to capitalize on this. With that operator, I would now like to open up the call to
Your first question comes from Tyler Langton from JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Hey, Good morning and thanks for taking my question. Just on sort of the cash cost guidance for the year, Could you provide a little bit more detail on sort of the impact of inflation and higher gold prices on that guidance? And then just, I guess when you think about the impact of potential inflationary pressures on 2022, is 2021, I guess benefiting from any Fuel hedges or supply contracts that sort of limiting the impact this year, but could kind of roll off next year?
Sure. So I would look at the increasing cash cost guidance as sort of 3 buckets. And roughly a third, a third, a third between the 3. So the first is just Not having the Tasiast ounces, those were lower cost ounces. So it's really a function of sales mix.
Fine. And the second being related to gold price, so we're at a higher gold price than our budget. We're paying higher royalties, and we provided sensitivities on that with our guidance back in February. So we said $5 an ounce for every $100 in gold price over our $1500 budget price. And so the 3rd bucket would be inflation.
And we're just we're watching the trends in inflation. We've seen some inflation starts impact our cash costs for 2021. To answer your question on hedging, we have hedges in place for 2021. We'd also have hedging in place for 'twenty two and 'twenty three, just at sort of lower levels. So For example, on fuel, we have we're about 55% hedged This year, 45% hedged in 2022 and then lower amount again for 2023.
Okay. That's really helpful. And then just switching to Round Mountain, I guess production was down just kind of slightly versus Q1 and costs were actually lower. I guess, could you talk just a little bit about kind of what drove this performance? And then just How are you thinking about the second half in terms of production and costs?
Well, Raman, as you know, we are working through the mitigation plan for the instability that had been detected earlier in the year. 1st and foremost, we have Essentially reduced the risk to a very low number. The wall has stopped moving. We continue our dewatering program. And what we've done at the mine is rather than mining in that Phase W, which was originally planned for the year, We've shifted focus to other parts of the operation.
So for example, we're doing another cut at the bottom of the pit. We're Developing further at Gold Hill, which is a satellite deposit as well as a portion of the main pit. So it's a Round Mountain is complex in the sense that it has Lot of sources of ore. And as we continue to unload that North Wall, we will continue to rely on these disparate sources of ore. So The various ore sources can be within the pit and the satellite pits from the heaps.
And as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, The waste dump that we moved at the top of the pit proved to be mineralized and we generated revenue there. But we expect Quarterly production at Round Mountain to be in that high 50s range for the next couple of quarters. And it'll be roughly at that level going into next year. And as we talked about on our last quarter, the higher annual production has been deferred until 2025. But we expect a round down production to be in that mid-200s to high-200s over the next couple of years.
And should cost be sort of should we expect cost to take a step up in the second half or to a later time?
Yes. Yes, cost will step up a little bit in the second half.
Great. That's it for me. Thanks so much.
Your next question comes from Fahad Tariq from Credit Suisse. Your line is open.
Hi, good morning. Just continuing on Round Mountain, the $50,000,000 in the remediation efforts cost, can you talk a little bit about how to reconcile that against from the waste power recovery that you just touched on? And then also how should we be thinking about that particular cost into 2022? Thanks.
So the overall I'll paint a high level picture here. The gross cost additions at Round Mountain are related to moving that waste dump And we will essentially breakeven on that because it proved to be mineralized, but also laying the wall back to a more shallow slope angle. So that will generate gross additional tonnages in the for the overall mine plan. However, I'm very confident that we have already and will continue to find offsets that on an NPV basis. And that doesn't include Phase S, which I'm also increasingly comfortable with.
So the gross additional costs around Mountain Not necessarily in year because our mining capacity is limited. So we're going to mine the same amount every year, but then the result is a deferral of ounces As more waste is moved in the near term. As for the accounting treatment, Andrea will talk about that.
Yes, really. I mean, as Paul said, we're moving the same amount of ounces. It's just the costs are being characterized as other operating costs given the situation there.
Okay. And on next year's costs, if we think about just like other operation other operating expense Related to round mounting.
Yes. So I think for next year, we're probably going to Call that mining costs, because the gross additional costs next year will be stripping costs.
So I mean, I'd say just other operating costs overall, the increase that we're seeing that I talked about this year is really kind of a 1 year thing. It's not something we expect continue in terms of that level of other operating costs going forward.
Understood. Okay.
Thank you.
That's it for me.
Your next question comes from Josh Wolfson from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Thanks. Just wanted to sort
of zone in a bit more on the cost for Toronto And Paracatu, as for Paracatu, I think you had mentioned that there were some sort of downtime items that affected that, but that also some local inflation. And then just want to understand, I guess, Where you see costs with these inflationary factors? And then same thing, I guess, for Tarana, where I guess there's a bit by fewer sort of external factors.
Right. So there's a one time maintenance downtime event on the conveyor. So that impacted The denominator, so that was contributor to the costs. Perhaps the biggest is the power cost increase. There is widespread drought in Brazil, particularly affecting areas with significant hydroelectric generation capacity.
And given The equalization mechanism in the Brazil power market, we ended up having some exposure to spot price. So the biggest increase In cost of care, it was related to higher than anticipated power costs. However, I should also point out that, That power cost impact would have been much greater had we not owned our own power plants. So we're really happy that we have those plants. In addition, we do see some local cost inflation.
Our labor costs are up about 5%, trending a little bit above the annual rate increases we've seen for a number of years. And we're starting to see some inflation in key consumables of which Perficu uses a lot, for example, Most notably grinding media, which is obviously a steel derived product. As for Toronto, its costs were high principally due to the relative mix of open pit and underground where we are in the mine sequence. But we expect Those costs will improve with as we get deeper into the life of mine as we go to greater share of underground production.
Okay. And then there are some good commentary on production heading 700 for the next 2 years. There's obviously a lot of different moving parts here. And even the historical numbers were under question given project growth opportunities, where is the current thinking on the direction of the future capital numbers for 2022 and 2023.
Sure. Maybe I'll take the lead on that one, Josh. Yes. Look, I mean, I think we do see a slightly different dynamic between the operating cost inflation and the capital. Operating being more of a sticky kind of lagging with things like labor.
There's no question we're starting to see inflation come into the system. We think it will probably be a little bit greater on the capital side. And I think it's a flow through. There's a macro and a micro effect there with commodity underlying commodities and Microeconomic supply demand factors. We think it's certainly here for the balance of the year and into next year.
We think in some cases, it will be a little bit greater maybe in the new project side. But we haven't sort of finalized a prediction on what that number will be. But I think the comment we're trying to say is, Yes, absolutely. Those capital numbers that we put out, which were there to support the 2.7 to 2.9 production, Now come with an inflation caveat and we're going to be monitoring that and look to refine our view. So I would say we're biased to obviously increasing, but I don't want to be kind of pinned down on the number just yet.
Okay. And sorry, just to clarify, I think the sort of understanding was kind of flat 900 ish going forward to The new higher volume outputs is sort of the impression that it could be above that sort of Flat line expectation or just above what the historical guidance was, which was, I guess, low?
Yes. So I think we've had a few discussions around this point. We were out there with a 9.87 in terms of capital, which was to support the production guidance of 2.7 going to 2.9, 2022, 2023. We then said if To the extent we continue, I think that's the point you're making of continuing to run out at say the 2.9 level, We would expect the capital to come back up towards $900,000,000 and we set a postal code Direction there would be to use a sort of a $300 per ounce kind of assumption. That's how we've characterized it.
And I think that's all Sure. But we're just trying to understand and get a little bit more focused here on where we might end up with the inflation effect on that.
Great. And Josh, we are seeing inflationary impacts in some of our capital estimates. Part of the increase at Manchow was inflation related. As I alluded to in my prepared remarks, some of it was scope related, Some of it was value added decision related, but there was an inflationary component. And we're seeing engineering firms, construction companies bidding projects with higher unit rates than they would have say a year ago in recognition of the fact that the overall Capital project space is heating up.
Okay. That's very helpful. Thanks very much.
Your next question comes from Anita Soni from CIBC World Markets. Your line is
open. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So firstly on Paracatu, I think we were looking for higher grades. I think it was from the western portion of the pit.
When I look at your guidance for this year, it was saying that part of the drive up to 2.4, 2.7, 2.9 was Great. That's Paracatu. When can we expect to see that?
Well, we're still targeting production around just short of or around 600 this year. We did have some lower grade in the past quarter as we mine in parts of the pit that historically had lower grade. But as we are in that west part in the next quarter, in the 4th quarter, We do expect a slight upward trend in grade, but not huge.
Yes. And we're talking like 0.37 versus 0.4, right? Is is that the variance?
Yes, that's right. Yes, 0.37 going to 0.4. Yes, that's right.
Okay. And secondly, on Round Mountain, I'm still trying to understand because there is a bit of back and forth in terms of what the Capital spend would be to flatten that slope and when that was going to happen. So in 20222023, you've got to do this pushback, to basically stabilize that wall. And I think when you came back on the last conference call, you mentioned that You're kind of mining constraints there. So I'm just trying to understand that CapEx spend for I think it was 30,000,000 to 50,000,000 tonnes that you had mentioned needed to be moved to flatten that slope and the timeframe I had assumed was the next 2 years Whatever dollars per ton cost, I'm just trying to understand, as I think about the capital going into next year, That to me is one of the biggest swing factors outside of your inflation comments.
Could you give me some color on that?
Right. So we are doing that the mine plan redesign right now. We haven't finalized the slopes and we're We put in the dewatering wells in the last quarter. We are pour pressures are coming down and we are finalizing the geotech design. So the Total quantum of tons is not yet finalized, but you're correct in the assumption that principally the moving of those tons will take place over the next 2 years.
And we are mining constrained. Round Mountain does about 100,000,000 tons a year. So instead of And this is the principal reason for the push out on the phase of the ounces instead of mining a certain proportion of waste and ore, it's now greater proportion of waste within that $100,000,000 constraint. So we will work through that excess in the next 2 years. And the total quantum of tons, I can't tell you exactly what it will be right now, but it's likely at the upper end of that range you talked about.
Okay. And then my last question, I'll pass it off to other people. Just trying to understand Tasiast at this stage. So I would assume prior to the fire, you guys that happened in the last couple of weeks. You were a little behind on the stripping and accessing the higher grade ores.
That's why we saw this lower grade coming through this quarter. And some portion of that would then also have been, I guess, stockpiles feeding the mill. How are you doing now as with this sort of dealing with the fire and trying to get back up and restarted. How are the mining rates in the last months and I guess 5 weeks going because I guess we're contingent upon you. One of the things that you had mentioned was that you would get ahead or get caught up on your stripping so that you could access those higher grade ores that were expected to drive, I guess, plus 2 gram per ton material next year?
That's right. So we continue to mine. So the mine was down for maybe 2 days at the time of the fire. But we're back up to the mining rate that we need. And what's happening right now is principally waste movement and building at this point today medium grade stockpile as planned we're going to get into the higher grade portion in the Q4 and those are going to be stockpiled as well during the mill rebuild.
So in effect, what's happening is at the start of January 2022, We expect to have the mill running full tilt. We expect to be mining run of mine high grade material In addition to having a couple of months worth of high grade stockpile on the ground. Now that the grade in that stock is not so high that it will displace what we would have mined from high grade next year anyway, but it does provide a derisking element in that It allows some flexibility on mining rate next year. So short story is This mill downtime provides the silver lining opportunity to get caught up on the mine plan, get back into a position where we're mining West Branch IV high grades And then derisking next year's production profile with the availability of stock up material.
And those West Branch high grades, they were north of 2 from 2.5 grams per ton material, right? Is that correct?
Yes.
Okay. And then I had one last question, sorry. Just with the Q4 Guidance that you'll be starting up sometime in Q4. Could you provide just apologies to ask this question, but could you My some clarity because Q4 is a big pretty big window. And is it early Q4, late Q4 for the restart or is it just near the end of the year kind of thing?
Well, I'll describe what exactly is happening. So we are we've turned the mill. We've done the integrity checks on the mill, the motor, the trunnions And other associated key components. In general, the big important things are okay. There's been damage to some ancillary things like The intake and the discharge shoots, some structural work on the cyclone tower.
And working backwards, the thing that needs to be replaced and it Drives the critical path to return to production is the trauma screen. We placed an order and we expect to have that arrive at site, call it Late October, early November. So it doesn't get better than that. That is the critical path. And it will depend on The installation time, which we envisage it will be about 2 weeks.
So it's not inconceivable that that mill is turning with the new trommel screen sometime in November. In a best case scenario, we'd have a good production month in December, but our revised guidance assumes no production this year. And We would strive to try to beat that. But right now, we're assuming full fledged 100% throughput startup January 1 with an upside towards from some production in December.
Okay. Thank you. That's it for my questions.
Your next question comes from Mike Parkin from National Bank Financial. Your line is open.
Hi, guys. Just a couple of questions left. The other operating expense, we got guidance for this year. How do you see that Trending as we go into 2022, if you can give color on that yet.
I guess, like I'd say, 1st of all, it's by the nature of those costs are difficult to predict, but the increase that I talked about in my remarks for this year is sort of a one time thing. It's not something we'd expect to repeat next year. There's no reason to expect at this point that next year wouldn't be back to what we've seen in the last few years prior to 2021.
And then just one final question. Congrats on signing that agreement with the Mauritanian government. Can you just give us a bit of color where the sticking point was in Tasiastuzu and why that was Excluded to get the main part signed off and where the kind of negotiations still sit with Passy Assuit?
Sure. I'll hand it off to Jeff here who is intimately involved in that whole process. But our focus and priority Always was to get the main event, which is the Tasiast mine buttoned down and we're very glad we've done that. As it relates to suit, Jeff, maybe to
Sure. Yes, that's right, Paul. And Mike, I guess what I would say is Our previous arrangements on Sood contemplated a different approach and ownership structure The main agreement on Tasiast. And we're delaying our negotiations. So excluding it was a catalyst for signing from the agreement and banking the main economic event at Tasiast, as Paul just said.
I would say that with the main agreement now signed and behind us, The door is wide open with the government to find solutions on suit and discussions will certainly continue. And I guess the last thing I would say is that while Souda's perspective, it's not material at this time. And certainly both the main Tasiast and Northern properties that we own remain prospective.
Okay. That's it for me guys. Thanks very much.
Your next question comes from Tanya Jakusconek from Scotiabank. Your line is open.
Great. Good morning, everybody, and Congratulations on getting that Tasiast Mill start up I guess start up getting it on track for start up in Q4. Just two questions. I'd like to start with Paul T. Just coming back on to that inflation question, both from capital and operating costs.
Can we just go through in your cost structure, just you mentioned labor, that specifically labor In Brazil, are you seeing labor inflation in the U. S. And or Russia? And maybe some of the other consumables Where you're seeing inflationary pressures on your costs first and then coming back to your capital, I have some more questions on that.
Okay. I'll walk through the cost bar For operating expenses, in the labor area, we are seeing cost increases that are only modestly higher than historical trends, principally in Brazil. And we're starting to see it tick up in the U. S. And Russia.
And what I'm saying here is, It's a 3% instead of 2% or 4% instead of 3%. So it remains somewhat tame, but in Brazil, it is something we are We are definitively seeing labor cost inflation in Brazil. What we are seeing in the U. S. And also in parts of In South America is labor availability and that will drive up labor costs down the road If there isn't a normalization on that labor availability trend.
In terms of consumables, WTI is what it is. You can do that calculation on a net of hedge basis. We provide information on the degree of our hedging. The other consumables where we're starting to see, Especially more recently an uptick in inflation are key things like grinding steel, cyanide, explosives. And importantly, For example, in areas like cyanide and explosives, we're seeing 10% increases that are principally going to be impacting Q3 and Q4 year to date, the numbers there have been more tame 2% or 3% or 4%.
But as we work through some of those lower cost inventories, We're now getting into material. That's 10% to 12% higher in cost, on those the chemical chain, so cyanide from explosives and reagents. In the case of grinding media, particularly at the large mills like Tasiast, Paracatu and Fort Knox, we're seeing pretty significant increases, 30% certainly looking at the next 2 months. And again, it's been more tame in the 1st 2 quarters as we work through the inventories, but there we're seeing about 30% going forward. And then the last part of cost is the big maintenance category both on services and spares.
There is probably where we see the lowest pressure as yet. And so I think when you put it all together, we're probably seeing as Andrea In her remarks, about a third of the cash cost revision upward is due to the inflation component. So It's been manageable in the first half, but here in May June and heading into July August, we do see inflation picking up into the back half of the year on OpEx.
But inflation itself wouldn't have taken us out of our original cost.
That's right, yes.
Just for overall context?
Yes. Had it only been inflation, we would have been at the Top end of our cash cost range.
Yes, the third of $40 an ounce is $12 So yes, I got Maybe on just the capital cost, it seems as though you mentioned, Paul, that the inflationary pressures are more on from contractors and firms. It doesn't seem as though there's specific issues or labor within that component that is have you focused on or maybe just a bit more clarity there?
Yes. So in CapEx, we probably see More inflation or the risk of greater inflation than in OpEx because we're exposed to both the monetary side of inflation, in other words, the price of individual inputs going up, but also tightness in the supply chain itself. So limited number of fabricators of value added equipment, limited pool of construction and engineering. And as I said earlier, we are seeing them bid projects with higher pricing than even 6 months ago or a year ago. So as a result of both the monetary side, in other words, price inflation on Straight up commodities, we're also seeing that value add supply demand tightness.
And as I said earlier with reference to Manchow, we are seeing 10% to 15% inflation related to capital estimates on growth projects, which is higher than what we're seeing on the OpEx side.
Great. That's good color on that. And then maybe just for Paul Rollinson, congratulations on the share buyback. Notice on the slide that you have $150,000,000 coming from dividends and $150,000,000 from the share buyback. Is that 1 from the share buyback to minimum?
And also, what would you need to see, to go beyond that 150?
Sure. Thanks, Tanya. Yes, look, That's certainly how we're looking at it. It's a start. I mean, the way I look at it, our intention was always to get into Buyback situation at this point in the year.
Then we had the setback with Tasiast. And as you know, we're As a result, we'll be deferring production and cash flow. So we're going to be down cash flow from where we thought we were Going to be free fire. Notwithstanding that, we're continuing on with this buyback and I think that doubly Sort of underscores our confidence in the business. When we look at the $150,000,000 we've established as a Sort of a baseline forever with the dividend.
It seemed to us a reasonable starting point given the scenario we're in right now Would be to double target to double that $150,000,000 to $300,000,000 We're on track. There's nothing operationally that we're looking at. I guess if I were to rewind a couple of weeks, if We were 90% confident we'd end up where we are today. A few weeks ago when we gave a mill fire update, If we were wrong, if we were in the 10% category, and it would have been longer than 4th quarter Perhaps that might have impacted our thinking around a buyback, but it has played out as we predicted. And so there's nothing operationally That would prevent us from continuing with this buyback.
Is it a it's a target we tried to give some color. I think a lot of people tend to put out 5% NCIBs and who knows what happens. We've tried to be very specific and you should hold us accountable for that number. Could it be higher? Sure.
We'll see how
There is no further question at this time. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Paul Rollinson.
Great. Thanks, operator. Thank you, everyone, and thanks for joining us this morning. We look forward to catching up in person, hopefully,
Conference. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.