Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Keyera second quarter results conference call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you require any further assistance, please press star zero. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker, Lavonne Zdunich , Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good morning, everybody. It's my pleasure to welcome you to Keyera's second quarter conference call for 2020. Our speakers today will be David Smith, Chief Executive Officer, Dean Setoguchi, President and Chief Commercial Officer, Eileen Marikar , Senior Vice President and CFO, and Brad Lock, our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. I would like to remind listeners that some of the comments and answers that we will provide speak to future events. These forward-looking statements are given as of today's date and reflect events or outcomes that management currently expects. In addition, we will also refer to some non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information on non-GAAP measures and forward-looking statements, please refer to Keyera's public filings available on SEDAR and on our website. With that, I will now turn it over to David.
Thank you, Lavonne, and good morning, everyone. As we continue to navigate challenges due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the health and safety of our employees, customers, and other stakeholders continues to be Keyera's number one priority. All of our operations are considered essential services, and our pandemic response plans have focused on the safety of our people and the continued safe and reliable operation of our facilities. In response to the business challenges caused by reduced industry activity and the uncertain outlook for the global economy, Keyera has taken decisive action. Since mid-March, we have reduced our capital spending plans, turned off the dividend reinvestment program, and reduced our operating and corporate G&A costs. In addition, in our Gathering and Processing segment, we continue to progress our facility optimization program to enhance our competitiveness and our profitability.
To date, we have shut down three gas plants, including two last year, and we have plans to suspend operations at five more over the next year. We expect these efforts will have a meaningful impact on our bottom line beginning in 2021, and will also materially reduce our overall greenhouse gas emissions. These measures help us well to manage the short-term challenges, while at the same time positioning Keyera for long-term growth. In the second quarter, despite a very challenging external environment, Keyera delivered strong results. We worked with our Gathering and Processing customers to keep the majority of their volumes flowing. Our Liquids Infrastructure business continues to demonstrate its resilience as it is backed by strong contracts with take-or-pay commitments. Our effective risk management program protected the margins in our Marketing segment through a period of unprecedented commodity price volatility.
Overall, our Integrated business delivered Adjusted EBITDA of CAD 182 million in the second quarter, while Distributable Cash Flow increased over the same period last year to CAD 158 million or CAD 0.71 per share. We also strengthened our financial position during the quarter. We have over CAD 200 million of cash on the balance sheet and a CAD 1.5 billion undrawn credit facility, providing unparalleled liquidity. We have minimal debt maturities in the next few years. We have a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.5x . we have two investment-grade credit ratings reflecting our very healthy balance sheet. This financial strength allows us to ensure the stability and continuity of our business and provide the flexibility to be opportunistic. That said, we will continue to take a disciplined approach to capital allocation. We will maintain a cautious stance in the current uncertain environment.
Finally, our year-to-date dividend payout ratio is 51%, and we are confident in our ability to maintain our monthly dividend of CAD 0.16 per share, which currently represents a dividend yield of almost 9%. I will now turn it over to Brad to discuss our operations.
Thank you, David. At Keyera, we remain committed to the highest standard of health and safety performance, and we continue to prioritize the well-being of our employees and contractors as they continue to operate our facilities reliably. Again, I would like to thank our frontline employees and contingent workers for their commitment to our values. Their diligence in working safely with one another has allowed us to keep our volumes flowing for our customers through this very challenging period. In the second quarter of 2020, we continued to progress our capital projects that are nearing completion and will begin to generate cash flow later this year. Our Pipestone gas plant will begin operating in September as our anchor tenant, Ovintiv, redirects its production from two other plants in the area.
In the fourth quarter, we expect to commission phase II of the Wapiti gas plant and also begin operating our Wildhorse crude oil storage and blending terminal in Cushing, Oklahoma. These three projects substantially complete our current capital program, allowing us to focus on the development of the KAPS Pipeline. KAPS project remains highly desired by industry as it provides a transportation alternative to move producers' condensate and natural gas liquids from the Montney to market via liquids infrastructure assets in Fort Saskatchewan. For Keyera, KAPS provides a strategic connection between our gas plants in the Montney and our NGL business in Fort Saskatchewan, and also creates a platform for a number of future opportunities. We have received all regulatory approvals from the Alberta Energy Regulator for construction of the mainline, and we continue to progress engineering work and refine cost estimates for this project.
Our schedule remains unchanged, and we begin to expect construction in 2021 and have the pipeline in service in 2023. I'll now pass it over to Dean to talk about the progress we've made on our optimization program and our future investments.
Thanks, Brad. Keyera continually review this business to ensure that we're positioned to create long-term value for our shareholders. Prior to COVID, we initiated a strategy to create a best-in-class cost structure across our company with a significant focus on our G&P business. It involves a continual effort to improve our cost structure without compromising safety and reliability while increasing throughput through our facilities. Our goal is to improve the profitability of our business and provide the most competitive service for our customers. As part of the strategy, we've been advancing our G&P optimization plan to reduce cost, improve utilization, and reduce our overall environmental footprint.
In addition to closing our Nevis and Gilby gas plants in 2019, we now have plans to suspend operations at six additional gas plants, which is expected to increase plant utilization in the south region from less than 50% to approximately 70% by the end of 2021. We also expect to reduce our current greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 12% compared to 2019. In addition to the optimization program, we began a process to reduce our overall cost structure, including a thorough risk-based review of our operational costs to identify sustainable cost savings. This process has produced meaningful results. In the Gathering and Processing segment, we expect this initiative, combined with our optimization efforts, to increase annual operating margin by approximately CAD 20 million-CAD 30 million, with the majority of this benefit beginning in 2021 and increasing throughout the year as we turn down facilities.
In the Liquids Infrastructure segment, we expect to reduce operating costs by approximately CAD 10 million-CAD 15 million beginning in mid-2020. Combine these savings with our recent G&A cost reductions, we expect an annual increase to our earnings before tax of approximately CAD 45 million-CAD 65 million, in addition to a more competitive fee structure at some of our facilities. We'll also be deferring approximately CAD 40 million-CAD 45 million in maintenance capital from 2021 to 2022 as turnarounds at the Simonette gas plant and AEF facility are now scheduled for the spring and fall of 2022 respectively. This decision was based on a thorough risk assessment to ensure the safe and reliable operation of both facilities. While we continue to improve the competitiveness of our base business, our goal is to ensure future investments continue to strengthen our Integrated business and improve the quality of Keyera's cash flows.
Our primary focus will be on our Liquids Infrastructure segment, which has demonstrated to be very resilient under the most challenging market conditions. These assets are generally critical for the basin, have high barriers to entry, and typically involve strong counterparties with a greater ability to secure long-term take-or-pay contracts. We have many growth opportunities, including KAPS, expansion of the Baseline Terminal, and long-term, the developments of our lands in the Industrial Heartland. As we expand our Liquids Infrastructure, it will provide further opportunities to source, transport, process, store, upgrade, and access high-value markets for natural gas liquids and earn additional margin for our M arketing segment. With that, I'll turn it over to Eileen to talk about our financial outlook.
Thanks, Dean. As David mentioned, Keyera delivered strong results in the second quarter of 2020, despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and low commodity price environment. All three business segments performed well. The Gathering and Processing segment reported operating margin of CAD 69 million, similar to the same period last year, reflecting Keyera's strong customer relationships that helped ensure only modest volumes were shut in during the quarter. The Liquids Infrastructure segment generated CAD 100 million in operating margin, demonstrating the resilience of Keyera's storage, transportation, and fractionation assets and its ability to generate a steady stream of cash flow despite market conditions. The Marketing segment earned realized margin of CAD 54 million as our risk management program protected margins and inventory values from the sharp decline in commodity prices that began in March.
Given strong contributions to the first half of the year and an improving commodity price outlook for the remainder of the year, we now expect Marketing's realized margin for 2020 to be between CAD 300 million and CAD 340 million. For 2020, our Distributable Cash Flow per share is expected to benefit from significantly lower cash taxes and maintenance capital expenditures. We are estimating a current income tax recovery of between CAD 20 million and CAD 30 million for the year, and maintenance capital to be between CAD 20 million and CAD 25 million. We expect to invest growth capital of between CAD 500 million and CAD 550 million this year. In addition, invest another CAD 70 million related to the butane distribution infrastructure at Kinder Morgan's Galena Park facility. We plan to fund our capital program, including KAPS, without issuing common equity.
With ongoing uncertainty as to when a recovery in energy demand and commodity prices may occur, we remain committed to our financial priorities, which include maintaining our two investment-grade corporate credit ratings, a long-term net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of between 2.5x- 3x , and a conservative payout ratio target of between 50% and 70%. With that, I'll turn it over to David.
Thanks, Eileen. The second quarter has demonstrated how our resilient business model delivers results even in the most challenging environment. During this unprecedented time, Keyera has also remained an engaged and responsible corporate citizen, committed to good Environment, Social, and Governance practices, also known as ESG. Keyera's commitment to ESG is rooted in our values, and although we haven't talked about it much, I am proud of our ESG track record. In June, RBC Capital Markets included Keyera as one of only two Canadian energy companies in their Global ESG Best Ideas list. Scotia Capital ranked Keyera number one for ESG performance among Canadian energy companies. Going forward, we are committed to continuous improvement, and we plan to share more information with our stakeholders regarding our ESG goals and initiatives that will support the long-term success of our business.
On behalf of Keyera's Board of Directors and management team, I would like to thank our employees, customers, shareholders, and other stakeholders for your continued support during these difficult times. Please continue to stay safe and healthy. With that, I'll turn it back to the operator. Please go ahead with questions.
As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star, then the number one on your telethon keypad. That is star one to ask an audio question. We will pause for just a moment to compile that Q&A roster. Our first question comes from Patrick Kenny with National Bank Financial.
Good morning, everybody. Just on the 10-day unplanned outage at AEF back in April. Can't recall if that was discussed on your Q1 call or not, but either way, maybe just some color on what happened there and perhaps, why you're confident that the facility will be able to operate at full capacity until your next major turnaround there in the fall of 2022.
Thanks for that question, Pat. I'll ask Brad Lock to respond.
Certainly. The unplanned outage in April was just a tube leak on a condenser within the plant. We were able to bring the facility down and do the repair in the 10-day timeline. When we do these turnaround deferrals, we actually look at the entire risk assessment of the facility and all the maintenance work that's been done, the regulatory requirements associated, et cetera. With all of that energy that we put into it, we're very confident that we can extend the turnaround cycle out till 2022. The outage that we had in April as well as the outage we had in 2019 allowed us to catch up on a lot of that work that would have driven a turnaround either in 2020 or 2021. All those things really led us to the decision to push the turnaround out to 2022.
Okay, thanks for that. Then maybe an update on Simonette volumes as well. Looks to be running at just 50% utilization, even with the short-term fee relief there in the quarter. Now with condensate demand coming back, how should we be thinking about Simonette filling up some of the white space there over the next few quarters? Are you able to pull some production in from other wells in the area, similar to, I guess, what'll be happening at Pipestone this fall? Is it mainly dependent on drilling activity making a comeback here in that Simonette area?
Hey, Pat, it's Dean. A couple of things. Obviously, there's been a lot of production fluctuations over the quarter just because of how low condensate price is for a while. Producers have obviously scaled back. I would say with respect to the volumes that you're seeing at Simonette, there are some producers that are producing below their take-or-pay, so we're still collecting their fees, but they're under-delivering the volume today. Certainly, when we look out into 2021 and for the remainder of this year, we certainly see a much stronger price environment both for condensate and natural gas, and natural gas liquids for that matter. I don't think people are going to start drilling right away. Certainly, they're looking much healthier, and I think that'll lead to more drilling over time to attract more volumes to our facility.
Okay, great. Last one from me, guys, then I'll jump back in the queue. Appreciate all the granularity on the optimization plan, including the 12% reduction in GHG emissions. That's obviously a good news story. Just wondering what other upstream or downstream opportunities you might be able to pursue from an ESG accretive perspective. We've seen some refineries here of late announce plans to switch over to biodiesel. Is there an opportunity there to capitalize on this renewable fuels trend, either from an infrastructure standpoint or perhaps more blending opportunities similar to your Galena Park opportunity there?
Pat, it's a great question. We've actually established an internal effort to look at some of those opportunities in a little bit more detail. Brad Lock is heading that up. I might ask Brad to maybe just mention a couple of the ideas that we're looking at from a long list of opportunities.
Certainly. We've got a vast list of opportunities that we've identified where we could advance our emissions activity. I think the trick is going to be finding the right ones that have the most impact for the least capital investment. I think we can look at additional efforts around carbon capture and storage around some of our facilities. We've got opportunities for waste heat recovery at a couple of the facilities that we would like to undertake. We can look at scenarios where we've got inefficient engines that we could change out with higher efficient engines that would reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. There's quite a plethora of opportunities in front of us, and it's just a matter of prioritizing, picking the right ones over time to get us to the targets and objectives that we want to achieve.
Okay. Appreciate all the comments. I'll leave it there.
Your next question comes from Matt Taylor with Tudor Pickering Holt.
Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions here. I just want to follow up there on Pat's question on G&P. Looking for some more color on your second half outlook for the segment. Is it fair to say, the CAD 69 million, could that be the low water mark for the rest of the year as you start to see some Pipestone volumes as you turn it on in September, North region contracts start to normalize, you might start getting some benefits a little bit early in 2020 before 2021, and then, to your point on Simonette, if volumes start returning there? Any color on the second half outlook of G&P would be helpful.
Hi, Matt. It's Dean. I think overall there'll be some pluses and minuses for the rest of the year. As you look at drilling stats, obviously, there's minimal activity today. Again, there are declines obviously in existing wells and things like that. I think on the promising side, as I mentioned before, that pricing, especially for natural gas, has not looked this good for many years. If you look back to the last few summers, gas has traded down to zero price or negative price, and here it's over CAD 2. We have a very good cost structure in terms of our production in Alberta, and that's because we've gone through many years now of poor pricing, and our producers have learned to be very efficient in terms of the cost of extracting hydrocarbons. I think with that, the economic environment is much stronger.
When we look at our customers, we look at maybe the ones that we had the most concern with, they're in a much better state. Bellatrix was purchased by Spartan. As you saw, Bonavista was recapitalized and puts them in a much better position. The bank lines with someone like Paramount has been reviewed, I think they're in a much stabler spot. I look at another company, Pipestone. Pipestone is on the smaller side, they are a very well-run company. I think overall, we feel much more confident about the environment going forward. Like I say, maybe in the next quarter or two, there's some puts and takes to that. I think as we look into 2021, I think the picture looks much more optimistic.
Thanks for those comments there, Dean. Just as a follow-up to that, looking in the back half of this year, how do you view the competitive landscape changing, if at all, if and when Topaz enters the market? Is that impactful to your business? Any comments on the competitive G&P landscape would be helpful.
Well, I guess as you heard earlier in our call is that our goal is to create a best-in-class cost structure. I think that's number one for us. On top of that, I think that we provide integrated midstream services. It's just kind of like your TV package. You get a better deal when you bundle it with your phone and your Wi-Fi. To have the touchpoint with a G&P helps us access business across our whole value chain. Again, we have those advantages that some of our competitors like Topaz wouldn't have. I guess thirdly, we're very customer-focused, and we are not a producer, and we're not tied to a producer, so we're very independent. We want to do what's best for all of our customers in the basin. I think that does have some traction and value for our customers.
Great. Thanks for that. One more from me, over to business development. You mentioned your focus is going to be on liquids growth backed by long-term contracts. To me, the potential expansion of Baseline seems to fit into that nicely. Can you remind me of the expansion potential there? Are you starting to have conversations to sanction additional tankage in 2021 ahead of TMX entering service in 2023?
Yeah, we have the ability to expand that site by 1.8 million barrels a day. The great thing about it is a lot of the common infrastructure. Sorry, 1.8 million barrels, not 1.8 million barrels a day. Thank you for that correction, David. Obviously, a lot of the common infrastructure is already there. We've invested a lot of money in the pipe rack, the manifold, a bridge over Baseline Road. Incrementally, the cost of building incremental storage there, capacity, is a lot less than the first phase. I do believe that as Trans Mountain gets closer to completion, those talks will continue to heat up.
Thanks for the color there. That's all for me. Thanks.
Your next question comes from Linda Ezergailis with TD Securities.
Thank you. I'm wondering if you can provide some more context around the improved utilization that you'll see as you consolidate your facilities. Does that include new volumes assumed coming from either drilling or other existing production not currently tied to any of your facilities? Is that just regarding all of your existing volumes being consolidated?
Yeah. Linda, it's really the math of just redirecting gas to fewer facilities. Again, the way we look at our cost structure, it's all about the absolute cost to run a facility and the volume going through there. It's on your per unit cost to deliver your service. If you look at utilization at most of the facilities in this province, they are very underutilized. That's advantage we have because in our south region, most of our facilities are pipeline connected, so it doesn't cost a lot of money for us to redirect it to our most efficient facilities, increase utilization, again, reduce our environmental footprint, and again, make us very competitive in terms of the cost of offering our service.
When we see a turnaround and we see more drilling happening in our capture area, we think that it will be very tough to compete with because, again, our per unit cost will be the lowest.
Okay.
Linda, it's Dave here. I'll just add, I think as we look at the south region from a longer-term perspective, I think it's our expectation that drilling activity will be sufficient to kind of keep the volumes flat. If we see growth in volumes with stronger commodity prices, I think that's a bonus, and we have the flexibility to be able to accommodate that growth. With the changes in ownership that we're starting to see and the consolidation that we're starting to see in that region, we're actually quite confident that the geology is such that we will see some recovery in drilling activity. We haven't assumed any growth in volume in our plans.
Okay. Just as a follow-up, for the redirected gas, can you confirm that all the volumes to be diverted have been commercially secured? How confident are you that some might not be lost in the process?
Yeah. Obviously, our first course of action was we wanted to reach out to our own employees and make sure they were aware of the plans, and we've done that. We've had a lot of discussions with our partners, where we do have partners at facilities, and also our customers. We feel quite confident that we'll be able to move those volumes as we have planned.
That's helpful. Thank you. Just with utilization going up and, for example, some of your optimization in the near- term or in the medium- term with AEF, might your maintenance scheduling generally shift around to a different cadence than in the past or a fter this period of change over the next couple of years, can we expect a reversion to a more typical maintenance timeline?
Brad Lock, would you like to comment on that?
Sure. I think there's pieces of equipment in the site that really drive the turnaround timing. What's going to cause our schedules to move a little bit is going to be our ability to take some of that work into other outages that happen in the site. I think after 2022, we will likely get back to a more predictable timeline, but any opportunity we have to adjust that, we're certainly going to take advantage through it if it creates a value proposition for us.
Thank you.
Linda, it's Dave here. I might add that technology is helping in this regard. It used to be that you had to do a turnaround according to a certain cycle because you didn't really have a good idea what you were going to find. I think the benefit that we have now of much more sophisticated control systems and data analysis gives us the confidence to be able to do that risk-based assessment that Brad was talking about earlier. We can, in some cases, extend those maintenance intervals knowing exactly what the implications are.
Thank you.
The regulators are often much more acceptable to these extended intervals with the risk-based inspection procedures that we have in place.
Great. Maybe just one last financial question. How might we think of a preliminary sense of what cash taxes might look like next year and beyond?
Hi, Linda. Given our growth capital program over the last two, three years, we would expect cash taxes certainly to be lower than it was last year. As we said, this year, we had sufficient tax pools so that we were able to create a tax loss and carry that back, and that's how we're getting the recovery. We will provide more information in our third quarter about cash taxes for 2021.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Shaan Thind with BMO.
Hi. Thank you. This is Shaan from BMO. Just on Pipestone coming in later this year, when do you guys expect that facility to earn the targeted 10%-15% return? I guess, can you just provide your view on the shape of that return?
Sorry, Shaan. The question was about Pipestone and what the profile will be of the cash flow after it starts up?
Yeah, exactly.
Our return on capital guidance, when we provided it was for the entire pool of capital, the CAD 2.2 billion program. That excluded the KAPS Pipeline. We still expect to be in that 10%-15% return on capital beginning in 2022 for that entire portfolio of assets.
Okay, great. Thanks. Then I guess just on Marketing, the long-term guidance, what are the structural factors, I guess, you guys see on maybe improving on that CAD 180-CAD 220 base guidance that you provided?
Yeah, I think a lot of it boils down to WTI price certainly helps generally for NGL business, because that's really the benchmark for some NGLs. Our isooctane business and really the recovery of driving demand. Again, the isooctane business has been a very resilient business for us. Right now, gasoline demand is probably at 85%-90% of what it would be typically. When I think about that and sort of the state of the economy today, I think that's pretty remarkable that demand is that high. At the same time, what's happening is that refiners are running at reduced run rates today, but the production of different types of competing octanes are producing at near capacity. It's creating a flood of octanes in the market right now relative to how much gasoline is getting produced and sold.
That's weakening the price of octanes in the near- term. We think that we'll see a recovery more towards into 2021 and later half of 2021. I think with that and some of the new assets that we're adding would bolster our base sort of guidance for our Marketing business.
Okay, perfect. Thank you. That's it for me.
Your next question comes from Robert Catellier with CIBC Capital Markets.
It's Rob Catellier from CIBC. It looks like you're feeling pressure on the marketing margins from both sides of the equation. You talked about how long it might take to work off the flood of, I guess, isooctane. What about the butane side in light of the fact that there's lower NGL production, increasing export options? Is that pressuring the butane costs as well?
Certainly, there's a lot of dynamics to what's happening with butane. Obviously, we have a lot of butane in our value chain already. There are export options, again, there's a cost to getting that barrel to the coast and exporting and everything else. Last year in 2019 was probably the lowest butane price that we've seen in Alberta ever. This year it's higher, and what I'd say though, if you look at a five-year average
The price of butane is still at a very attractive level where we can make some attractive profits still with our isooctane business.
Okay. When you look at the current dynamics in NGL and liquids, what that means for the Wildhorse terminal, do you expect that to be a baptism by fire in the short- term, given where pricing is and access to blending agents? Or what sort of a ramp-up to your targeted returns do you expect on that facility?
We've done a lot of work to prepare ourselves to put that facility and the business in place so that it can be working efficiently. Like any business, there is going to be sort of a ramp-up period in terms of, again, getting that business to where we expect it to be. We think that's relatively short, like probably a six-month period, in terms of a ramp-up. Again, there's still lots of varieties of crude and additives that are being produced and some that are discounted. Again, we think that we have a very good business to, again, be able to create value with different blend stocks of crude and other additives.
Just one more on the G&P business. In your targets for cost reduction and increasing profitability, I'm curious as to how much automation is involved in achieving those targets. Are the benefits of potential automation still something you're working at that could add to the profitability in the future?
Brad, do you want to take that question?
Sure. Automation has played a significant part in getting the cost efficiencies we have to date, but we're clearly not done. There is still lots of opportunity there in terms of centralized operation, enhanced maintenance practices, higher-level equipment monitoring, that we're really just scratching the surface on right now as far as the options that are out there. Again, I think it's going to be finding the right balance of where do you invest in those technologies to give you the right returns. We've got a team that's actually in place that is really looking at innovation as an organization and where do we find the real values that we can achieve. I think there's more to come.
Okay, that's interesting. Then, just on the dividend policy here, hopefully the market understands by now that you plan to maintain the dividend and it's sustainable. What do you need to see to resume dividend growth now that, hopefully, the worst of COVID is behind us and you're starting to realize some of the benefits of the cost optimization plan?
Hi, Rob. It's Dave here. I think, first of all, in the context of the current environment, there's still lots of uncertainty. I think it would be prudent for us to just kind of keep the dividend where it is. If I reflect back over our 17 years of history, we've always taken a cautious approach and made sure that whenever we increase the dividend, that we have a high degree of confidence that we can sustain it at that higher-l evel. I think that still is the philosophy that governs our decision-making. There's a lot of things that factor into that. What's our outlook for growth and cash flow? What's our outlook for capital requirements? Questions like that. I think we're going to continue to be cautious, probably for at least the next couple of quarters, and then we'll see.
Those are the factors that we look at.
Okay. That's helpful. Thank you very much.
Your next question comes from Robert Kwan with RBC Capital.
If I can just go back to the cost savings and the optimizations. Just to confirm, especially for G&P, but even for the others, are those figures shown net? For example, any fees that you're going to be passing on to customers that's already baked into the CAD 20 million-CAD 30 million incremental?
Correct, Robert. These are all net to us, the benefit to Keyera. There would be an incremental benefit to the customer on the G&P side.
Perfect. Then you've used the term earnings before tax. I'm just wondering, are these figures similar from an EBITDA perspective, or are there material changes in G&A, whether that's write-offs or accelerated amortization that we need to consider?
Correct. It would be similar to EBITDA except including G&A. Correct. It would be the same as EBITDA.
Okay, perfect. Turning to KAPS. You've got your regulatory approvals in hand. It sounds like it's really just that delay into 2021, which really, I don't think is a material change in messaging, but is it really just the passage of time that we need to be thinking about, or are there other considerations before you move into construction? Other discussions you need to have with your customers?
Robert, I think, it's still our plan to be going forward with KAPS middle of next year. We still have, as we emphasized in the spring when we announced the deferral, we still have commitments in place from all of the same customers that we had when we made the decision a year ago. We are revisiting all aspects of the project, and at the same time, we're talking to customers further north and west to see if we can enhance the picture. Right now, our plan is to go ahead. Obviously, there are some uncertainties in the environment. Our expectation is that assuming things are back on track by early part of next year, that would be our plan.
If I can just finish with funding. You reiterated the equity self-funding message. You've got the messaging around short to medium-term. I just wanted to confirm that from your perspective, short to medium-term covers off the timing with respect to KAPS construction. Maybe a second part of it is, as we take a step back, what considerations would be out there with respect to the thoughts about migrating away from an equity self-funding model?
Hi, Robert. Yeah. Based on the way we see things today, we do plan to adopt more of that self-funding model. We don't expect to issue any common equity for our growth capital program, and that includes KAPS. Given the strength of our balance sheet, our strong liquidity position, et cetera, we feel quite confident in that. At this point, that would be our plan for the foreseeable future.
That's great. Thank you very much.
Your next question comes from Rob Hope from Scotiabank.
Morning, everyone. Follow-up question on Robert's question on funding there. Just given your comments on improving or focusing future capital on the L iquid segment and potential funding requirements on KAPS, are you thinking about potentially using some of your gas plants as a source of funding? Like for instance, Pipestone, you could sell a minority non-op interest there as a source of funding.
Yeah, Rob. Good morning. It's Dave here. We're always looking at the portfolio that we have and determining what assets make sense, and that includes the possibility of divestments. That is certainly a source of funding for other opportunities that we might want to pursue. I think it wouldn't be prudent of me to speculate on what assets that might include. I think we're careful not to ever fall in love with our assets to an inappropriate degree. The other thing that I would point out, of course, is that we've also done a number of joint ventures, and we think that we're actually pretty good at aligning with partners to share the capital cost burden on a number of the investments that we've made over the years. That is certainly another possibility when it comes to funding requirements.
All right. Appreciate that. Just in terms of Wapiti 2, we've seen a little bit of a push out of the commissioning to better align with your customer requirements. Taking a look at existing volumes and rigs operating out there, could we see some movement in the take-or-pay such that you could utilize just Wapiti 1 for a portion of 2021?
Certainly, as I mentioned before, there's not a lot of drilling right now in that area. We believe in the near term that we can provide the service with our first train. We are planning to bring the second train on no later this year. We want to make sure that facility is ready to go when we need it and certainly enhance overall reliability of the whole site as well. I would say again, Wapiti is another facility where when you look at volumes, they're not necessarily matched to the revenue that we bring in because the take-or-pays are above where some of the volumes are today.
All right. Thank you.
Your final question comes from Elias Foscolos with Industrial Alliance.
Good morning. Maybe I'll direct this a bit towards Dean. Thanks for bringing up Baseline, but wanted to play back on Investor Day, and you talked about the whole sort of liquid hydrocarbon chain. Is there any possibilities or things percolating on the ethane side, given that I hear rumblings of an ethane cracker being added in Alberta?
Yeah, absolutely. Our business is really centered a lot about on NGLs, ethane would be included in that package as well. I think there are opportunities for us to supply more ethane, even to satisfy existing requirements today for petrochemical use. Again, it's just everybody likes to have competitive alternatives. Again, I think we're that logical, competitive alternative to supply that market. When we look at what the Alberta government has announced in terms of ambitions to diversify our economy and to expand the petrochemical sector, I think it's tremendously exciting for our province and for Canada. Keyera can certainly be a big part of that. Again, we have an existing value chain where we have, and we handle a lot of NGLs already. In addition to that, we have undeveloped piece of land. It's about 1,300 acres, and it's adjacent to our Josephburg terminal.
In my mind, when you look at long-term petrochemical development, what you need is, it's a factor of cost. I think you have to be very environmentally responsible. I think we can offer both at our site. It has unparalleled connectivity. We have almost all of the underground salt rights for storage, which is a big requirement. You can access both rail lines. It's industrial zoned, and again, we have access to water and everything else on that site. We could also make it a very environmentally friendly site with power, water. The Alberta Carbon Trunk Line is just to the north and to the east of us. Again, when you look at all the connectivity and the proximity of that development, there's a lot of potential long-term for petrochemical development.
Okay.
Elias, it's Dave here. The one other thing I would mention is, going back to the earlier question about KAPS. We are still looking at the possibility of expanding and/or reconfiguring KAPS, to be able to handle an ethane- plus feed throughput. From our point of view, that would require some sort of a contractual commitment to support that. Along the lines of what Dean was suggesting, that's another opportunity that we're still looking at actively.
Yeah, thanks for bringing that up because I understand it's higher vapor pressure and requires probably a different configuration. Would you be looking at the commitment from the producers or the ultimate consumers, both? Just as a follow-up.
Either or both.
Okay. Maybe one last question, as almost everything I had has been asked, it has to do with cost savings, and maybe I'll try to direct this towards Brad. I think when I looked at the table, I didn't necessarily see annualized cost-saving reductions from lower maintenance, as you have less plants. Not specifically getting to that, but maybe relating to that. Is there anything else on the cost-saving side that might come through at some point in time? You're always surprised what you can do when you're pushed.
Brad, do you want to respond to that?
Sure. I think there are savings, and in summarizing the data, we tried to break it up into, here's the cost reductions as a result of the Central Foothills Optimization Consolidation Program. Here is the specific cost savings as it relates to our targeted cost-reduction activities at existing sites. There are certainly a number of maintenance savings when you go into the maintenance capital side. All of our turnarounds, for example, are captured under maintenance capital. We see maintenance capital savings because those facilities that we shut down do not require outages to go with them as well. There's a lot of those types of things that are actually kind of built into those numbers already.
Okay. That's it for me. Thank you very much.
I would now like to turn the call back over to Lavonne for any closing remarks.
Thank you everyone for listening in o n our conference call. If you have any additional follow-up questions, please reach out to Keyera's investor relations team. Thank you for your support and investment, and have a great day.
That does conclude today's call. You may now disconnect.