Welcome to the OMV Q3 2023 Results Conference Call. If you would like to ask a question after the presentation, you may register your request by pressing the star one button on your telephone at any time during the actual presentation or during the question and answer session itself. You should have received a presentation by email. However, if you do not have a copy of the presentation, the slides and the speech can be downloaded at www.omv.com. Simultaneously to this conference call, a live audio webcast is available on OMV's website. At this time, I would like to refer you to the disclaimer, which includes our position on forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on beliefs, estimates, and assumptions currently held by, and information currently available to OMV.
By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that will or may occur in the future and are outside the control of OMV. Therefore, recipients are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. OMV disclaims any obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, revised assumptions and expectations, and future developments and events. This presentation does not contain any recommendation or invitation to buy or sell securities in OMV. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Florian Greger, Senior VP, Investor Relations and Sustainability. Please go ahead, Mr. Greger.
Yeah, thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to OMV's earnings call for the third quarter, 2023. With me on the call are our CEO, Alfred Stern, and Reinhard Florey, OMV's Chief Financial Officer. Alfred Stern will walk you through the highlights of the quarter and will discuss OMV's financial performance. After that, both gentlemen will be available to answer your questions. With that, I'll hand it over to Alfred.
Thank you, Florian. Ladies and gentlemen, good morning, and thank you for joining us. The third quarter of 2023 was characterized by supply concerns in a tight oil market, strong refining margins, and lower gas prices. The chemical market remained challenging due to only a muted economic recovery and high inflation. Brent crude oil prices increased by 11% compared to the previous quarter, but were 14% below the average level of the same quarter in 2022. Prices were supported by an improvement in seasonal demand and the supply reduction of close to 1 million barrels per day imposed by OPEC+. European gas prices dropped by 9% compared to the prior quarter, and 83% versus the third quarter of 2022. The main reason for this was the high filling level of storage facilities across Europe, which impacted market sentiment.
Supply concerns, fueled by the strikes at Australian LNG export terminals, provided some support. Refining indicator margins in Europe rebounded and almost doubled compared to the prior quarter. This was primarily attributable to solid demand during the driving and holiday season, a series of refinery outages in the Atlantic basin, as well as reductions in refinery runs caused by the heat. Gasoline, middle distillates, and fuel oil were very strong, while naphtha remained weak. In chemicals, end market demand remained lackluster. Olefin indicator margins further declined due to subdued demand and economic activity. Polyolefin indicator margins declined as well, albeit to a lesser degree than olefins, impacted by the cost of living crisis and significant destocking. Despite supply being more balanced with demand due to reduced operating rates in Europe, a structural oversupply remained. This was more pronounced for polypropylene as a result of weak demand for durables.
While low domestic prices discouraged imports into Europe, Chinese prices showed some signs of recovery, supported by higher naphtha prices, while weak demand and overcapacity persisted. At EUR 1.3 billion, the Clean CCS operating result was 13% higher than in the second quarter, but dropped significantly from the exceptionally high level of the prior year quarter. Cash flow from operating activities amounted to EUR 1.7 billion in the quarter, impacted by decreasing commodity prices. Looking at operations, polyolefin sales volumes were 11% higher year-on-year, while fuel sales volumes rose by 16%. The utilization rate of our refineries and European crackers was lower than the typical level of 90% plus, due to planned turnarounds in Petrobrazi and at the chemical-related facilities in Schwechat and Porvoo.
Oil and gas production was slightly lower year-on-year, primarily due to lower production in Norway and Romania. We continue to further diversify our gas supply sources. We signed a 5-year agreement with Equinor starting October this year, to receive an annual volume of 12 terawatt hours. The new agreement builds on the long-standing relationship between the two companies and adds to the volumes under existing contracts. In October, we signed an agreement for the worldwide commercial licensing of our proprietary ReOil technology with Wood, a global leader in consulting and engineering solutions in the energy and materials markets. The companies have established a joint delivery team to support clients through the whole process of adopting and successfully implementing the technology at their sites. In addition, Wood will work with ReOil licensees to provide full asset lifecycle support globally.
ReOil is our patented chemical recycling technology that converts end-of-life plastic waste into pyrolysis oil, which can serve as feedstock for new high-performance plastics. At our integrated refinery and chemical site in Schwechat, we are currently in the process of finalizing the construction of a 16,000-ton ReOil plant. This morning, we announced that we have joined forces with Interzero to build an innovative sorting plant with an annual processing capacity of up to 260,000 tons in Walldürn, Germany. Interzero, formerly called Alba Recycling, is one of the largest sorters of light packaging waste in Germany. OMV will invest more than EUR 170 million and will hold a share of around 90% in the newly formed joint venture.
This sorting plant will be the first of its kind on a large industrial scale and will produce sustainable feedstock for our chemical recycling plants. The new plant will use mixed plastic waste that has previously not been recyclable, especially from the yellow bag and yellow bin waste collection in Germany. Startup is expected in mid-2026. At the beginning of October, we announced the startup of the third polyethylene plant at our Baystar joint venture in the U.S. The new polyethylene unit has a capacity of 625,000 tons per year, more than doubling the total capacity. With the completion of this project, Baystar now runs an integrated ethane to polyethylene complex in Texas, with a capacity of 1,000,000 tons per year.
The complex comprises a world-scale ethane cracker at the TotalEnergies' platform in Port Arthur and three polyethylene production units at Baystar's site in Pasadena. The new PE unit, referred to as Bay Three, features the latest third-generation proprietary Borstar technology, which has been licensed for the first time in North America. The Borstar technology delivers advanced value-added polymers with enhanced sustainability by enabling light weighting and the incorporation of larger amounts of post-consumer recycled materials in end products, serving the energy, infrastructure, and consumer products industries. Expanding and deepening our footprint in North America enables us to better serve customers by offering improved access to Borstar-based products produced locally. The new integrated complex is very competitive as it is positioned in the top quartile on the U.S. cost curve and has well-established logistics infrastructure around Houston.
As usual, in the process of starting up such a large industrial complex, the focus in the beginning is to ramp up the utilization rate. We will then optimize the product portfolio by gradually increasing direct domestic sales and the share of specialties. Let's now turn to the financial performance in the third quarter of 2023. Our Clean CCS operating result improved by 13% to EUR 1.3 billion compared to the second quarter of this year. However, compared to the very strong prior year quarter, the result decreased, primarily due to the substantially lower price environment. The performance of energy dropped sharply by around EUR 2.1 billion. Chemicals and materials declined by around EUR 200 million, while fuels and feedstock increased.
The Clean CCS tax rate decreased from 54%-47% due to a significantly lower contribution from countries with high tax regimes to the total group profits compared with the same quarter of the previous year. The Clean CCS net income attributable to stockholders declined to EUR 431 million. Clean CCS earnings per share amounted to EUR 1.32. Let me now come to the performance of our business segments. Compared to the third quarter of 2022, the clean operating result of chemicals and materials dropped sharply to -EUR 11 million. This was driven by substantially lower margins, the missing contribution from the recently divested nitro business, and the materially lower performance of the Borealis JVs.
The nitro business had an exceptionally strong contribution of EUR 113 million in the prior year quarter, due to temporary special market conditions in 2022. In the second quarter of this year, the nitro business was loss-making. The ethylene indicator margin declined by 26%, and the propylene indicator margin went down by 43%. In turn, the polyethylene indicator margin remained almost stable, while the polypropylene indicator margin declined by 7%. As a consequence, we recorded a negative market effect of around EUR 150 million in our European olefins and polyolefins businesses, compared to the third quarter of 2022. Primarily, due to higher naphtha prices, inventory valuation effects were less negative by EUR 125 million compared with the prior year quarter, and thus largely offset the negative market effect.
However, they still negatively impacted earnings in the third quarter of this year. The operational performance of our chemical business declined overall, showing a mixed picture. The contribution of the olefins business increased, while the performance of polyolefins weakened. The olefin contribution was driven by higher sales volumes as a result of a higher cracker utilization rate and a materially larger light feedstock advantage at our Nordic crackers. While in the third quarter of this year, we had planned turnarounds at Schwechat and Porvoo, the prior year quarter was significantly impacted by the incident at the Schwechat refinery and the maintenance turnaround at Burghausen. In polyolefins, the sales volumes in Europe rose compared to the prior year quarter, when they were impacted by the reduced feedstock availability in Schwechat. However, the increase was seen mostly in consumer products, where margins are currently weak.
In the specialty business, we were able to increase margins, but sales volumes declined. The positive impact of higher sales volumes was more than offset by lower realized margins and higher costs in light of the Schwechat's turnaround and inflationary environment. The performance of the JVs dropped to EUR 44 million due to a lower contribution from Borouge and a negative contribution from Baystar. The Borouge result declined, driven by significantly weaker margins compared to the third quarter of 2022. However, sales volumes increased by 18% compared with a relatively weak prior year quarter when China was still in lockdown. At Baystar, the utilization rate of the ethane cracker improved, but operational challenges could not be fully resolved. The result continued to be burdened by depreciation and interest expenses amid a weak market environment.
The Clean CCS operating result in fuels and feedstock increased by EUR 79 million to EUR 418 million, thanks to a significant recovery in the operational activity of our refineries, as the prior year quarter was impacted by the reduced utilization rate at the Schwechat refinery, following a technical incident. At $14 per barrel, the refining indicator margin was very strong and reached almost the same level of the excellent prior year quarter. Total sales volume increased by 16%, driven by commercial customers, partially offset by lower retail volumes following the divestment of the Slovenian business in June 2023. The excellent development of our commercial business was driven by higher volumes and margins due to the removal of price caps and better term prices.
The retail contribution reduced significantly, primarily due to lower fuel unit margins, which were impacted by the substantial increase in oil prices. In addition, the divestment of the Slovenian network and higher costs due to inflation impacted the result. The contribution from Upstream Refining and Trading decreased to EUR 73 million, driven by lower refining and trading margins. The clean operating result of energy dropped considerably to EUR 942 million from the extraordinarily strong prior year level, primarily due to declining oil and substantially lower gas prices. Diminished sales volumes and a reduced contribution from gas marketing and power also weighed on the result. The Brent price came down by 14% compared to the prior year quarter, while European gas hub prices declined sharply by 83%.
OMV's realized oil price decreased slightly more strongly than Brent by around 18%, and the realized gas price declined less than the hub prices by 69%. As a result, we recorded a negative market effect of almost EUR 1.5 billion versus the prior year quarter. Compared with the third quarter of 2022, production volumes decreased by 18 to 364,000 barrels per day, mainly due to unplanned shutdowns in Norway, natural decline in Romania and Norway, and maintenance work in Malaysia. Production costs increased to $9 per barrel due to lower production volumes and the adverse development of currency exchange rates. Sales volumes decreased by 46,000 barrels per day following the production decline and the lifting schedule in Libya and Norway. The gas marketing and power result amounted to EUR 20 million, a decline of EUR 79 million.
The contribution of Gas Marketing West improved, despite the booking of a provision for impending losses connected to newly secured pipeline capacity to Austria for the next 5 years of around EUR 80 million. The prior year quarter was burdened by curtailments of the natural gas supply from Russia. In Romania, the contribution of the gas and power business declined in the context of significantly lower gas and power market prices and additional regulatory interventions introduced after September 2022. Turning to cash flow, our third quarter operating cash flow, excluding net working capital effects, amounted to around EUR 1.9 billion, a decrease of 35% compared with the previous year's quarter, primarily driven by lower commodity prices. This includes dividends from Borouge of around EUR 220 million.
Net working capital effects generated a cash outflow of EUR 163 million in the quarter, mainly due to increased prices and volumes in fuels and feedstock, and partially offset by lower prices in chemicals and materials. As a result, cash flow from operating activities for the third quarter came in at EUR 1.7 billion. The organic cash flow from investing activities was around EUR 800 million. This included the PDH plant in Belgium, the ReOil demo plant, the co-processing unit in Schwechat, and the turnaround in Schwechat and Porvoo. As a result, the organic free cash flow before dividends for the third quarter came in at EUR 880 million.
The inorganic cash flow from investing activities generated an inflow of around EUR 570 million, supported by the cash inflow of EUR 661 million related to the divestment of the Nitro business. Looking at the nine-month picture, cash flow from operating activities, excluding net working capital effects, amounted to EUR 3.5 billion. Supported by a sizable cash inflow for the net working capital effects, cash flow from operating activities in the nine months amounted to EUR 4.6 billion, down by 27% compared to the first nine months of 2022. After payment of record dividends of EUR 1.9 billion, the organic free cash flow amounted to EUR 200 million. Moving on to the balance sheet.
We reduced our net debt to EUR 1.7 billion, and our leverage ratio at the end of September decreased to 6%. This reduction was supported by the cash inflow of EUR 661 million coming from the divestment of the Nitro business, which we closed in July. At the end of September 2023, OMV had a cash position of EUR 7.8 billion and unchanged EUR 5.2 billion in undrawn committed credit facilities. Let me conclude with an updated outlook for this year. As usual, we will present our outlook for next year with our fourth quarter earnings in February. We now expect the Brent oil price in 2023 to average above $80 per barrel on the back of a strong third quarter, continued voluntary OPEC+ cuts, and heightened geopolitical uncertainty.
The average realized gas price forecast remains unchanged at around 30 EUR per megawatt hour. In chemicals and materials, we now estimate that the ethylene indicator margin will be slightly below the previous guidance at around 510 EUR per ton, while the propylene indicator margin remains unchanged. In polyolefins, we forecast a slightly better polyethylene indicator margin at around 320 EUR per ton and an unchanged polypropylene indicator margin. The steam cracker utilization rate is expected to drop slightly to around 80%. As demand remains subdued, we now forecast polyolefin sales volumes of around 3.6 million tons for this year. In fuels and feedstock, we have seen the refining indicator margin averaging at around $12 per barrel in the first nine months. In October, it started to retreat from recent highs as the driving season came to an end.
We are now expecting the refining indicator margin for the full year to be in the range of $10-$12 per barrel. The utilization rate of our refineries is now anticipated to be around 85%, driven by longer than planned turnarounds that are now completed. The guidance for fuel sales volumes and margins is unchanged. In energy, the guidance for the average production of around 360,000 barrels per day for the full year is unchanged. Total production in the fourth quarter is expected to be slightly lower than in the third quarter, impacted by plant maintenance activities in Romania. The clean tax rate for the full year is expected to be in the mid-40s%. Before we come to your questions, I would like to address the topic of royalties in Romania.
Last Friday, an emergency ordinance introducing higher royalty rates for oil and gas was adopted by the government in Romania. According to our preliminary estimates, based on our current understanding, these new rates apply prospectively to the future concession agreements. Thus, we expect no impact on short term. Thank you for your attention, and now Reinhard and I would be happy to take your questions.
Thank you, Alfred. Let's now come to your question. I'd like to ask you to limit your questions to two at a time, so that we can take as many questions as possible. You can, of course, always rejoin the queue for a follow-up question. The first question comes from Henri Patricot, UBS.
Yes, hello, everyone. Thank you for the presentation. Two questions, please. The first one, I was hoping you could give us a bit of an update on the Borealis, Borouge potential combination, whether there's anything new you can say around the timeline, et cetera. And then, just secondly, I wanted to ask you about the cash tax payments. We saw kind of a better cash flow generation than underlying earnings this quarter. Looks like it's partly related to some of the extraordinary taxes, including the solidarity contribution. Can you remind us what we should expect in terms of cash tax payments over the next few quarters, and particularly when it comes to these solidarity contribution? Thank you.
Thank you, Henri. I will start with Borealis-Borouge question, and Reinhard will offer the cash tax payment question, solidarity co-solidarity contribution. We are effectively in negotiations with ADNOC to negotiate a potential combination of Borealis and Borouge. On the industrial logic, we would do something like this because that combination would provide for a growth platform that would also be one of the leading polyolefins companies globally. And we could build on a long-term partnership with our partner, ADNOC, there to then continue to grow this. What we are aiming for is a equal share equal rights partnership in a company that will also be stock listed.
Now, we are in the middle of these negotiations, and hence, cannot make any detailed comments on the progress of those. But of course, we are aiming for the best possible outcome for OMV in these negotiations.
Yeah, and Henri, to your questions regarding cash tax payments. You have seen that cash tax rate as such has come down from Q2 to Q3. The main impact, of course, is lesser payments in Norway due to the different price levels in Q1 and Q2. We had still payments referring to the price levels of 2022. That has eased out. Now, we will not see those kind of impacts anymore in Q4 this year, or we are also not expecting this to reoccur in 2024, as the prices overall, specifically for gas, have come down significantly. Please note that in Q3, we also had less taxes paid than booked in an amount of roughly EUR 150 million.
That's part of our other adjustments that you have seen here. This is normally the deferral of some periods of the payments that you have, so I'm just mentioning that to you. On the other hand, we have the solidarity contribution in Romania and Austria, together around EUR 100 million for Q3.
... these have not been paid out, as they always are due for payment only in the consecutive year. But of course they have been booked, so this has been around EUR 75 million for Romania and the rest around EUR 100 million for Austria. So when you were looking at the outlook for that, of course, it's very hard to predict. In Q4, we would see that the level of tax rate probably stays in the same range as we have seen in Q3, as we are not expecting too much of a difference in the commodity prices, which are the main drivers actually for the tax rates. And in next year, let's see, we don't expect for the beginning of the year, a major change.
Maybe we'll see if there's a cold winter, some of the gas prices going up a little bit. But, other than that, we are not expecting any special topics here. When it comes to solidarity tax payments, we are expecting Q4, the payments to be slightly lesser than in Q4. However, for 2024, there is not any of those taxes to be booked expected, so we will just pay the taxes for 2023, but for 2024, there is no basis in the EU to prolong this, and we do not have any indication that this would be the case.
Great. Thank you.
Thanks, Henri. We now come to Michele Della Vigna, Goldman Sachs.
Thank you very much for taking my questions. Two, if I may. First, I wanted to see if you could give us an update on the potential divestment of your Malaysian assets and what you think the timeline could be there. And then secondly, given your unique position in the chemical value chain to see what's going on in the global economy at the moment, I was wondering if you could comment on whether you're seeing any specific areas with signs of life and recovery, and on the other side, if there are some areas that are showing a slowdown versus what we've seen year-to-date. Thank you.
Thank you, Michele. I will start with your question around the divestment of Malaysia and New Zealand assets. We are following the process as we have communicated it earlier, and we have now received bids for these assets, and we are in the middle of the evaluation of these bids, and we'll then make some decisions in the coming weeks, before the end of the year. Then, the second question around the chemical market, that is, of course, a little bit more complicated, as we see a very mixed kind of bag of different indications.
I will start with maybe saying that, as you may remember, through Borealis, we have a portfolio where we are looking at about 45% of the sales volumes being specialty type of polymers that go into higher value applications. And the rest going more into productivity, more commoditized areas. And we see different type of behavior in those different areas. Throughout the last couple of months, we have actually seen on the specialty areas good robust demand in automotive. We have also seen good demand in wire and cable insulations. And we have seen weaker demand around the more commoditized areas.
I don't know if this is an actual sign for the future, but what we have then encountered in the third quarter is that we were able to increase our sales volumes also in the more productive area to make sure that we can also use high utilization rates of our assets. In particular, also in Polyolefins, we have seen versus a year ago that they were able to increase their sales volume quite dramatically, actually. Of course, the comparison is difficult because a year ago there was still some lockdown restrictions in China.
So, compared to the industry, we are actually able to run high utilization rates in our assets, where we see more pressure still is on the pricing side, where we have seen that this is now kind of flattening out, but still a difficult environment where we see. So some progress in being able to move volumes, but still a difficult environment.
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you, Michele. We now come to Sasi Chilukuru, Morgan Stanley.
Hi, thanks. Thanks for taking my questions. I had two, please. First of all, regarding the polyolefin markets, you highlighted the persistence of structural overcapacity and weak demand. Looking into next year, I was wondering if you could provide some color on how you see the dynamics changing, from a supply perspective, whether you see an overall increase in the supply capacity? If yes, whether it was possible to quantify it and provide some color on where you're seeing these increases, or will it likely stay flat? Just wanted to check if we should expect the utilization rates of the European plants to remain low in early 2024 as well. The second question was related to M&A. Just wondering, are you currently actively looking to acquire more in the chemical space?
If you could comment on your appetite for deals beyond the potential Borealis-Borouge combination, that would be helpful as well.
Thank you, Sasi. Let me try and address your question around the polyolefin market, where we have seen in the last couple of years significant capacity additions, and with the current low demand situation, that leads to overall low capacity utilization, which is creating the situation as it is. I want to relate this more to an OMV perspective, and look how that can affect us. We have actually made quite a lot of work in order to make sure that we have well-positioned crackers, and with this, and also polyolefin plants on the different cost curves.
And, Borouge, of course, is a very big part of that, based on ethane crackers, on advantaged feedstock cost. We are supplying into Asia with differentiated technology, differentiated products. So, that leaves us in a good position to also make sure we can run high capacity utilization. The Borstar polyethylene plant that Borealis just brought on stream, there we will have to do some work in the next couple of months to fully ramp it up and to then further high-grade the product portfolio. But again, that cracker is, of course, positioned very well, taking advantage of U.S. ethane prices that are significantly advantaged.
And finally, in Europe, on our Nordic crackers, we have invested a lot in feedstock flexibility. In Sweden, for example, we even bringing over, ethane from the U.S. to use that cost advantage. And with this, we can also use higher utilization rates. So that's one lever that we will pull and, of course, we also see that the products that we make are demanded in the markets, and we will see, over time, the growth picking up again. And then, on the specialty side, I think this is where we make a significant part of our margin. As I mentioned before, there we see more differentiation, and we, of course, need to see how the economy continues to develop.
But one area that is our highest margin contributor in specialties is around wire and cable insulations. I really think there we have a long-term growth perspective, also driven by the energy transition and transformation that we see globally. Your second question around M&A, I would want to say that we are, of course, fully focused and in the process at the moment to drive forward our discussions together with ADNOC on a potential combination of Borouge and Borealis. And we want to make sure to optimize here the results for OMV and to drive it forward as quickly as possible.
Beyond this, we have always said that if we can find ways how to accelerate our transformation, we will also consider inorganic investments. But at this point, I have nothing specific I can report to you there.
Thanks, Sasi. We come now to Ram Kamat from Barclays.
Hello. Thanks for taking my question. I have a couple, please. If I look at refining performance, it was not quite there, despite better headline margins, and the ADNOC contribution was also lower. Wonder if you could talk a few things about this. And then, the contribution from the gas and marketing business, which is less in this quarter. I understand that there was some provision which negatively impacted margin, but how do you see it going forward into the full quarter?
... Yeah, Ram, happy to answer your questions here. When it comes to the refining performance, we have to take into account a couple of topics that were relevant in this quarter. First of all, we had in the total FNF, not only refining but also retail. And in the retail part, we have seen that there has been, of course, the lack of the Slovenian retail assets that lowered the business income in general, but we have also seen that not as high retail margins as we have seen in the third quarter of last year, that were exceptionally high because of a rebound situation from the COVID were actually on their way.
When it comes to refining as such, we have seen that the refining utilization as such has been not at its full height. We have seen a retail refining utilization at 84%, mainly impacted by the Petrobrazi turnaround still in July. So that brought down in July our utilization to below 80%. That improved then for August and September, and we have now also some impacts from the turnarounds on the chemical side, also coming back to the refinery in Q3. In Q4, there will be none of that. So we will certainly see a little bit of a rebound of that utilization level on the refineries. And then your question was on the contribution from gas?
Yes, indeed, there have been 2 impacts actually on the gas side. One was that, due to the high level of storage, and on the other hand, dropping prices, there have been some impairments of gas inventories in the magnitude of EUR 60 million. And in addition, you may have seen there has been a mark-to-market adjustment of the contracts with the pipeline capacities. That's actually pipeline capacity contracts for the next 5 years in the magnitude of EUR 80 million. This is simply a mark-to-market valuation, does not take into account that, of course, this will be profitable business when the volumes ultimately will be used and will be sold, else we wouldn't do it.
So, those are some special effects that you have seen, and that lowered the income in general, both on the gas side as well as on the FNF side, for this month. You were looking into an outlook, specifically also on the gas trading business. I think gas trading business always depends a little bit of the weather. We have high storage levels, which allow us, of course, to take care of all the needs and demands when winter kicks in and when there is increased trading activity. So we actually are certainly in a situation seasonally, where there is rather an uplift Q4, Q1 in the gas trading results and gas trading business.
Thank you.
Thank you, Ram. The next questions come from Irene Himona, Société Générale.
Thank you very much for taking my question. First, on the Basell JV, you referred to the continuing operational challenges. Are these the normal, let's say, snagging issues with all startups, or is it something more fundamental, and does the JV have a clear timeline for resolving them and eventually ramping up to full capacity? Secondly, on recycling and ReOil, I wonder from a technological viewpoint, is there some uncertainty or some doubt concerning the ability to effectively scale up that technology to, let's say, world-scale plans? Thank you.
Thank you, Irene. I will maybe start with the Baystar question. Just for your recollection, what was built there was a 1 million ton ethane to ethylene cracker and a 625 kiloton Borstar polyethylene plant. The joint venture already had before two polyethylene plants, so that it now makes a fully integrated 1 million ton ethane to ethylene to polyethylene complex. Operationally, starting up such a complex is always takes some time and always faces some issues that need to be resolved, some changes that need to be made in order to make sure everything is running. Those are very complex plants that are in operation there.
... I want to mention maybe two things that you should understand. Number one is that because this is part of a fairly sophisticated and large ethylene network in Texas, it means that the polyethylene plants and the cracker can run in a way independent from each other. That means, not if one is shut down, the other one needs to shut down, too. So this is rather helpful in order to make sure to mitigate some of the effects.
On the plan, I would also want to make sure that of course I say there's of course a good plan how to resolve some of the issues that are there. There are some issues that are purely startup related and making sure we are running all the things properly. But there is also some issues that will take a few months to completely resolve. Which of course there's a good and solid plan for it, and that is not constraining in any way that we continue to have a good forward movement with that complex there.
Your second question, concerning ReOil and ReOil technology. There I would like to highlight that we have been working on this ReOil technology for over 10 years now. We have a pilot plant in operation in our refinery in Schwechat since more than 5 years. And that pilot plant is fully integrated in that refinery. It's been running over the last 5 years. We have made a lot of optimization, a lot of tests. What are all the different influences that can happen there? And we have, in the meantime, over 20,000 operating hours on this plant, so that it's been really tried and tested for many different occurrences.
And at this moment, we are completing the construction of a 16,000-ton plant, also in the refinery Schwechat, in order to then bring that to the next level. 16,000-ton plant, if I compare that globally, that's often a full-scale recycling plant. Our plan for the full scale is 200,000 tons. And we are already planning then to scale that up. But we want to take some of the learnings that have occurred in the scale up now to 16,000-ton to transfer that.
We have a quite high confidence level, which I think is also reflected by the fact that we have just signed with Wood an agreement that together we will license that technology globally to other parties. We believe that makes sense because the technology has a lot of potential, but the product that comes out is not a differentiated product, so that we believe this is a good way how to accelerate the circular transformation for chemical feedstocks.
Thank you very much.
Thanks, Irene. The next question come from Tamás Pletser, Erste Bank.
Yeah, thank you very much. Good morning. I got one question regarding your exposure to the potential disagreement between Russia and Ukraine on the gas transit by Ukraine. So can you just elaborate, how does it affect your business if this relationship breaks down completely and there's no Russian gas transit from the end of 2024? Thank you.
Tamás, thank you for your question. I will start like this. At OMV, we have two supply contracts with Gazprom. One is in Germany, and one is in Austria. The German gas contract has not had any supply since about the middle of last year. The Austrian gas contract had a lot of uncertainty and variability in the second half of last year and still in January. Since then, Gazprom has supplied the contractually agreed quantities through that period. Now, the Austrian contract is actually supplied through that pipeline going through Ukraine and Slovakia to the border, Slovakia, Austria.
What we have done in OMV now, after over the last 18 months, is we have worked very hard to diversify our portfolio of supplies. And we have booked logistic capacities, so that today we are in a position that we can, we can, supply all our customer obligations from non-Russian supply sources with the pipeline capacity bookings that we have made. Also, whenever it's necessary, also, if the Russian supplies would stop. So this, from this perspective, we can switch the supply then to alternative supplies.
Okay. So do I understand correctly that is it more like a price risk for you than a supply volume risk? Is it a correct assumption?
Tomas, no. As we are always in a hub environment, the prices are not advantaged if they come from Russia or from Norway or from Wales. So the situation is rather to say, how do we deal with all the capacities that we need to bring the gas from places like the Netherlands or or Italy or Germany or Norway into the area of Austria and the neighboring countries? But the pipeline capacities are booked also on a long-term basis, so the diversification of the gas supply for our customers has more or less, more or less fully happened. So in terms of an out interruption, that would not change.
Okay, great. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Tamás. The next questions come from Matt Lofting, J.P. Morgan.
Hi, Rein. Thanks for taking the two questions, please, if I could. First, I wanted to just ask you about your perspectives on the fiscal stability that Petrom faces in Romania, in the context of the changes on future concessions to the royalty rates that you highlighted earlier in the call. And then also recent suggestions that some elements of the offshore law pertaining to Neptun could be up to sort of further discussion as well. So, can you talk about that and the rate of change around that, and the extent to which you're comfortable on the fiscal framework and mechanism that Petrom faces going into 2024 and beyond?
And then secondly, just gas marketing and power within the upstream or energy business, as you now call it, the contribution there seemed probably lower than expectations in the third quarter, even accounting for the provisioning effect within the West business. Can you talk about some of the moving parts within that, and how you see that looking forward into next year? Thank you.
Matt, a quick comment on the fiscal framework and the perspective in Romania. Regarding the Neptun project, everything is stable and no impact at all from these discussions about new concessions, because the concession is there, and the concession is untouched from any kind of of new activities there. Also, for most of our other production in Romania, we have the concessions in place, and only in a couple of years from now, there would be necessary renewal of these kind of concessions, and only by then an eventual change could come in. The magnitude also is by far not very exciting to talk about.
So, the Neptun part, absolutely stable, and when you refer to offshore LNG discussions, those are just discussions about potential export opportunities that might come on top of what we have, but the project is based on the existing opportunities, and therefore, we see that this is a very profitable investment. When it comes to gas marketing and power, I have mentioned that there have been some a one-time effects going against our result in Q3. However, in general, there is a certain seasonality in the business of specifically to the gas marketing. In quarters 2 and quarter 3, we normally have a business where the storages get empty and are being refilled again.
So normally, strongest quarters are quarter one and the beginning of quarter two, but also the ending of quarter four, if winter kicks in early. So therefore, the one times effect apart, we have to live with this seasonality, and we do not see any kind of change in the business model as such. And the fact that OMV has some of the largest storages in Europe certainly helps the stability of this business.
Great. Thanks, Reinhard.
Thanks, Matt. We now come to Bertrand Hodée, Kepler Cheuvreux.
Yes, hello. Thank you for taking my question too, if I may. Coming back on the negotiation with ADNOC and the potential combination between Borouge and Borealis, in parallel, ADNOC is also in negotiation with Covestro. Are you involved in those negotiations? Because I struggle to understand how you cannot be involved in some way. 'Cause at the end of the day, should ADNOC buy Covestro, ADNOC may also want to potentially integrate Covestro into so Borouge, Borealis combination. So that, that, that was the first question. And then, when I look at the chemicals outlook, I see another strong oil demand growth in China, led by mainly petchem feedstock, i.e., naphtha and and LPG.
Suggesting that there is again, as it was in 2023, very strong petrochemicals capacity addition in China. It looks like this is still the case in 2024. So, do you really expect any improvement in chemicals next year?
Thank you, Bertrand. Let me start with your ADNOC and Covestro question. I want to go back because I think I didn't say it or explain it properly. The discussion that OMV and ADNOC are having at the moment is about a combined polyolefin company. So, it will be a focused company that would be aiming to become a leading player in the polyolefin market, so polyethylene and polypropylene with that scope. Covestro does not produce any of these polyolefins, and as OMV, we are not involved in these discussions, and I can therefore also not comment on unrelated business discussions, yeah. Your second question around the chemicals outlook.
I would want to say here that our strategy in that polyolefin area is that we are focusing on well-positioned assets from a feedstock perspective to have a cost advantage, but at the same time, to make sure that through innovation and technology, we continue to grow our specialty portfolio. So in total, we are looking at differentiated products that are not aiming exactly for the commodity type of market in order to make sure that we remain then in a competitive position.
At this point, I do not want to comment for too long a perspective, but I would agree that fourth quarter and first quarter next year will continue to be difficult quarters there. But in the long run, we do see that demand will pick back up, and the supply-demand situation will then improve again.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Bertrand. We are at the end of the conference call and would like to thank you for joining us today. Should you have any further questions, please contact the investor relations team. We will be happy to help you. Goodbye, and have a nice day.
Thank you. Goodbye, have a good day.
Goodbye.
That concludes today's conference call. A replay of the call will be available for one week. The number is printed on the teleconference invitation, or alternatively, please contact OMV's Investor Relations department directly to obtain the replay numbers.