Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Voestalpine first half business year 2024-2025 conference call. I'm Sergeant, the call's co-operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a Q&A session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Peter Fleischer, Head of IR. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much. Good morning, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, For the call and the webcast of our half-year results. With me is our CEO, Herbert Eibensteiner, and our CFO, Gerald Mayer, who will give you a brief overview around the 10, 15 minutes presentation of what were the highlights of the half-year and the outlook, and afterwards, we will be very happy to answer your questions, so far from my side, Herbert, please go ahead.
Thank you very much, Peter. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. You have already seen our information on the first half, 2024-2025 financial year. So today, I would like to start by presenting what we have done in this difficult environment in the first half of the year. And we have quite a bit of managing tasks to do or have done this. We have made some structural decisions for structural challenges. That means that we started a selling process for Buderus Edelstahl in Germany. It was a strategic decision. And we have signed this project. So closing is planned at the end of the calendar year. And we started the reorganization and the streamlining of our Automotive Components business in Germany. I think we can discuss this afterwards, and I'm sure that you have some questions about that.
But on the other hand, on the positive side, we want to show you our successful international growth projects for this last half year on the example of our Railway Systems, which is very well underway and growing even in these difficult times. We have made a small acquisition of a turnout plant in Knoxville, in Tennessee, for the United States, for the American markets. And we have implemented two years ago a joint venture in Egypt, a turnout plant. And we have now the first delivery for a big project in Egypt, more than 250 turnouts for this bigger high-speed train project in Africa. And we have already completed in the last weeks a major rail project in Hong Kong for an underground in China.
And I always explained to you in the past that we have the rail business, the turnout business, and we want to be more and more a system supplier for that Railway Systems. And when we say systems, we need to have a system. And the heart of the digital heart of this business, we have now presented at the InnoTrans in Berlin. And central system means all the software and all the sensors we need for more complex railway applications is presented and will be complete our system approach.
I would like to continue with the green bond placement. You know that we placed successfully our first green bond. It was also the first green bond in the European steel universe. It's a five-year bond with EUR 500 million at 3.75% annual coupon. Value date was beginning of October. This is also the reason why you will not find it in our half-year numbers. On the one side, we paid back the prior bond, and we put into our books on October 3rd the new one, and this, of course, was a very positive and attractive bond, in particular also for retail. We are very strong in Austria.
I want to continue, sorry for that. I want to continue with our decarbonization project, greentec steel. The headline is "Everything on Time, on Budget." Just to remind you that we have planned a digestible, risk-reduced step-by-step approach for the first step, 30% CO2 reduction with an investment capital expenditure of EUR 1.5 billion. We are in the middle of our project. 50% of the CapEx is already awarded. And as I mentioned before, everything is on time and on budget. What was the development and what is the development on our markets? Europe is the weakest market for us. Nevertheless, Railway Systems, our Aerospace Department, and Warehouse and Rack Solutions business did very well. And in North America, all our Voestalpine plants did very well.
Although we have to see that there is a slowdown in oil and gas business, but this business affects more or less mainly a European production site. In Brazil, although we see a slowing economic environment, you know all this flooding in the south of Brazil where we are affected a little bit. But all in all, our plants really performed quite well, which is remarkable in this complicated environment there. And also our Chinese plants performed very well thanks to a very good industrial production. And so you can see what we always say, that this global positioning and being in these different sectors and focusing on these high-quality products are balancing our earnings. What was the development in the four different divisions? Steel Division performed well in a very difficult European environment. And High Performance Metals was under pressure, especially in tool steel.
This was the reason also strategically that we sell or divest Buderus, but Aerospace and all the specialty business did quite well. Metal Engineering, very unchanged, strong thanks to this high demand on railway infrastructure, and this is a global business for us, and as I mentioned before, with a slowdown, especially in prices and also some volumes in the OCTG business. Metal Forming is somewhat divided. Automotive Components weak in Germany. That's why we have our reaction is this reorganization program in Germany with efficiency programs and redundancy plans, but the industrial business, Tubes and Sections, and also especially warehouse, the warehouse business developed overall solid, and that leads again that we see these different divisions, and every division adds to our resilience when it comes to our results compared to the difficult environment we are in.
Now I would like to hand over to Gerald Mayer for the financial overview.
Markets, about our strategy and some success projects and also reorganization projects we started. I would like to show you now how this translated in the first half into our numbers. First of all, in this overview, you see that revenues are down by EUR 500 million, roughly. EUR 300 million directly linked to lower prices. EUR 200 million roughly directly linked to lower volumes. One thing to mention is that we saw reductions in all our divisions, so Steel Division is down roughly by EUR 200 million, High Performance Metals by EUR 160 million, Metal Forming by EUR 80 million, and Metal Engineering, sorry, Metal Forming by EUR 80 million, Metal Engineering by roughly EUR 30 million. Of course, this has also an impact on EBITDA, but to mention here, so this reduction by EUR 185 million in our EBITDA here is reflected also EUR 81 million, which are again linked to the Buderus sale.
You know that because we reported it also in the first quarter. We reported an impact there of EUR -27 million and another EUR 50 million, roughly EUR 54 million in the second quarter. So EUR 81 million is referring directly to Buderus sale. In addition to that, our EBITDA is affected by roughly EUR 40 million of our gas storage, natural gas storage valuation. Prior year, it was just EUR 18 million. So the delta is there EUR 22 million. And of course, I also mentioned that we saw lower volumes, and this has again an impact on the lower EBITDA. Depreciation was roughly at the same level as last year, so around EUR 380 million. And so we end up at an EBIT of EUR 339 million. And this is again roughly EUR 180 million below the comparing period. Nothing really important to say about the financial result.
It's again at the same level as last year, minus EUR 90 million. For you as a guidance, we expect on the one side, of course, we have our new bond at 3.75%. On the other side, we still see reductions in interest rates. All in all, we expect perhaps a slightly lower total interest number going forward. Tax rate, in particular for Q2, not for the first half, seems to be a little bit high. This has to do with an impact from Buderus sale. The overall number tax rate is 26 point something percent. It's slightly, perhaps slightly higher than expected. Giving you some details about the EBITDA bridge. The first two columns here means price EUR - 303 million and raw material EUR + 353 million. This shows that we saw a gross margin which was better than in the comparing period.
Going there into the details, I have to mention that we have a positive, some tailwind from Steel Division. On the other side, we have negative impact, which partly compensates the positive effect from Steel Division in HPM, means High Performance Metal and Metal Engineering. Mix: volume negative is down by EUR 60 million. Again, we have some positive impact there from a better mix, which is more than compensated by lower volumes. I talked about the volumes before when I showed you or presented to you the reduction in our turnover line item. Metal Forming is EUR - 175 million. This is the number where you see EUR 81 million out of the Buderus sale. Of course, we have some inflationary effects there in our cost structure. Of course, this is EUR - 175 million. But the bulk there is this 81 from Buderus. Cash flow, next slide.
Cash flow from results is at EUR 585 million after EUR 659 million in the comparable period. Changes from working capital minus EUR 239 million. It's a little bit lower than in the prior year. And here, I would like to draw your attention to our comment there. We have a EUR 100 million tax liability, which we reduced, which referred to prior periods. So we had a very positive year, 2022-2023, with an EBITDA at this time of EUR 2.5 billion for the whole year. And this EUR 100 million referred to this period. We had to pay the taxes, as I said, right now. So it's not referring to the current period here. So cash flow from operating activities at EUR 350 million, roughly compared to EUR 390 million.
We would say it's a strong cash flow from operations given our environment right now and taking into account what I just mentioned about this extraordinary tax payment or periodic tax payment we had. Cash flow from investing activities minus EUR 500 million. This EUR 500 million includes EUR 56 million from our Steel greentec steel projects, means from the transformation to a CO2-free production in Linz and in Donawitz. As we mentioned before, both projects are on time and on budget. Giving you also some guidance here about the rest of the year. So what we expect for the second half going forward is around EUR 700 million in terms of investing activities and also with a significant or higher contribution there or share of our greentec steel project. So we will end up roughly at EUR 1.2 billion in investing activities for this year.
Cash flow: EUR - 165 million free cash flow in the first half, after EUR - 85 million this year. You definitely will ask the question about how we see the future there. We will see, in our opinion, or we are convinced to see a swing here in the second half, and we will expect a positive free cash flow for the full year 2024-2025. Slide number 10, development of our gearing ratio. You see that it was increased slightly in the first half of this year. The main reason was that we had, for example, our dividend payment and distribution. There is included, of course, also these tax payments and some, I would say, seasonal things there. We are convinced that this will come down a little bit again until the end of this year.
So the equity base is unchanged and solid, 48% equity ratio and net debt to EBITDA at 1.4 given compared to taking into account the last four quarters of EBITDA. Very solid. Next slide. And this is my last slide. This simply should give you an overview of our redemption schedule, which is very sound. You also see on the first column there, liquidity. We also included there our green bond we placed. As I mentioned before, value date was beginning of October, so it's not included yet in our numbers, in our half-year numbers, but it was fixed at this time. So this is EUR 500 million.
And in the EUR 1.3 billion committed lines, I think I reported this also the last time in our Q1 presentation, EUR 300 million, which we already signed with European Investment Bank, are included and are not here in the committed line column, but it's not included in our financial liabilities yet. We will do this when we need it. So in my opinion, the homework regarding redemption and refinancing is done for the year 2024-2025, and we have a very sound redemption schedule in front of us. So having said that, I would like to hand over again to Herbert, who will give you the outlook.
Okay. Thank you. I think the outlook will be no surprise for you because we have already reported our outlook, what are the basis of our outlook. So we see that the European in the course of this first half year, we see that the sentiment indicators weakened in Europe. We have recently heard some warnings of several European car producers. And this was the figures you heard were the effect of all those weaker economy. And what is the expectation for the second half of the year? We do not really see a recovery in Europe, despite we expect further interest rate cuts. We see also a muted demand in the European automotive industry. We do not expect a relevant improvement in the next month. We have already in this forecast the non-recurring expenses for the reorganization of the German Automotive Components business planned.
We think, and I think we see a good development so far that first-time business outside of Europe is positive. So we think that it will continue on good actual levels mentioned before: Railway business, Aerospace business, Warehouse and Rack Solutions, Tubes and Sections to a certain extent. So this is what is the basis of our forecast. And you know it, we expect an EBITDA of around EUR 1.4 billion at the end of the year. And as Gerald mentioned before, this forecast includes this one-off of even more than EUR 100 million for this reorganization and other topics. So this was our presentation. Thank you for listening, and we are happy to answer your questions.
Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Questioners on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode while asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. And we have the first question coming from line of Alain Gabriel from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Thank you for taking my questions. I have two questions, please. The first one, in your release today, you referenced quite a bit your business, ex-Europe, as you appear to be focused more on increasing your geographic diversification and reducing your earnings volatility. From an EBITDA mix perspective, how much is ex-Europe today, and where do you see its share evolving in the next three years as per your ambition? That's my first question.
I will start to answer this question. You know we have a clear strategic path that we want to increase our share in local for local. That means especially the U.S., which is a growing market for us. We have, as I mentioned before, already moved several activities there out of Europe. So you know warehouse and rack solution is a growing business. So we had the discussion to build up or to expand our production sites here in Europe. No, we did it the other way around. We implemented a warehouse and rack production site in Kentucky. We have increased our tubes business for the U.S. in the U.S. with EUR 25 million investment. We will do a business for system members for two international truck suppliers in the U.S. for the U.S.
And so these are results of our strategy that we assess as examples for this strategy to be there where the customers are. And this will be the core of our strategy in the years to come. And when you look at Railway Systems, which is very international, all those activities I mentioned, we did this acquisition in the U.S. for turnout business for the U.S. market, well aware that railway business is a business where everything is America first. So I think that you have good evidence how we think about that.
Thank you. And in terms of the numbers, in terms of your estimate?
I'm right now adding the numbers now.
Thank you.
It is an estimate which I have here now with me. You might know that our share in the European Union is roughly 63% in turnover. The EBITDA number might be a little bit lower as we have this extraordinary effect like Buderus sale and so on included there. I would guess roughly 55% is in Europe as we speak and 45% rest of the world. Given our strategy and our ambitions in general, it should grow out of Europe. Of course, we have to take into account that we had this EUR 80 million roughly of Buderus, which again compensates something. Structurally, definitely will happen that it will grow outside of Europe.
Thank you very much. And my second question is that you're embarking on substantial restructuring of your underperforming businesses like Buderus and a few others. How much of an uplift in EBITDA do you anticipate as a result of all these measures you're doing currently and in the future on an annualized run rate? How should we think about the uplift to your profits as a result of these initiatives? Thank you.
This is a two and a half years project in Automotive Components, and you will see a higher double-digit recovery in automotive business. And when you look at Buderus, which was EUR 30 million to EUR -40 million , so we can expect for the year to come after the closing that we will see a EUR 30 million- EUR 40 million EBITDA uplift coming from Buderus. And automotive, you have to so we started now, we'll increase and 2026, 2027, you will see this, or is planned to see this higher double-digit million euros in EBITDA.
Thank you.
The next question comes from the line of Tristan Gresser from BNP Paribas Exane. Please go ahead.
Yes, hi there. Thank you for taking my questions. I also have two. So I'll start with the pricing dynamic in Europe. So current HRC prices are around EUR 550 million-EUR 560 million a ton, and last year they were on their way towards EUR 700 million per ton. So how do you look at annual contract negotiation in that environment? And can you remind us if you had to accept ever in your history triple-digit declines on your contracts in the past, and if this year that could be a possibility?
I think I would like to start. First of all, of course, we saw and you know that we have quarterly half-year and yearly contract, which we have to negotiate with our customers. Just a part of the yearly contract ready to be discussed right now as we speak, starting from 1st of January, and of course, we saw this downward movement of the markets. On the other side, we also recognized that we saw again upswings in the last weeks there in our markets, and also CRU and the other research houses show us that they expect, let's say, increases in the upcoming weeks. So historically, I think perhaps my colleagues can answer this, but from my conversation, I never heard from a triple-digit price reduction, and this is also from my perspective, not what we expect right now. This will not happen.
Yeah, I think that's true. So I think there are, and you know all these discussions what's around at the market, considering that when we talk about auto contracts, this is more high-quality steel that you focus on. And we do not expect that we will see this triple-digit price reduction. We expect a reduction, and this is part of our forecast. That's clear, but we do not expect a triple-digit price reduction.
All right. That's helpful. Thank you. And moving to the, well, still the steel business, and if you can discuss a little bit the outlook for the division in Q3, Q4. On the volume side, I think you're 9% down year on year, and you have a blast furnace that I think should have restarted by the end of October. But how should we think about volumes and the margin development? I'm also curious about, and I mean the performance on selling prices has been good, and you flagged the mix. But if I look at plate shipments, they're actually down half on half if I look at H1. So what was really the mixed impact? And if you can discuss that, that'd be great. Thank you.
Yeah, Q4 is always our strongest volume-wise, our strongest quarter. Normally, we will see a certain margin squeeze that's clear coming from the automotive contracts. But as I mentioned before, better volume, and it's always a price-volume mix. What's important for me, we can expect in the second half of the year a better mix in heavy plates. So far, as we see, this is more project business for us. So we know what we want to produce. And I think, yeah, that the volume reduction, when you look at the volume production in heavy plates, I think that's not really a good indicator for this EBITDA development because this is project business with very special high-grade material, which we have a huge variation in EBITDA, and it's very mixed dependent.
So the focus is that we automate, that the key message is better volume, but better mix coming from heavy plates, and all in all, especially when it comes to flat steel, a lower margin.
All right. That's very helpful. Thank you.
The next question comes from the line of Bastian Synagowitz from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Good afternoon and all. Thanks for taking my questions. I've got a couple. Maybe first one following up on the restructuring plans you have, I'm wondering, is there anything which you're working on beyond Metal Forming to address the possibly structural headwinds in the auto-exposed businesses and elsewhere? That's my first question.
That’s clear that we do the adaption to the lower volume. When you look at our employee figure, you may see that we have a slight increase year- in- year. In fact, we have reduced 1,200 employees to adapt to the lower volumes all over the world, I would say. And on the other hand, we have 1,700 people in addition coming from the growth of railway system, coming from the growth in high-bay warehouses, and coming also from two smaller acquisitions, this railway business. And we have acquired also a wire drawing company in Italy. So I think the reaction is all over our business in this one point, 1,200 people, which reflects roughly EUR 100 million, roughly EUR 100 million , where we have already reduced our workforce.
Okay. Thanks Herbert . On a different topic, actually around Ukraine, should we go into a peace deal scenario? What would be the implications for you, and what, if anything, would be changing to your raw materials procurement, and then also logistics versus how you're operating today?
You know that we got still some material from Ukraine, and we get iron ore pellets from there. The biggest portion is by far coming from other regions of the world. You know it's a logical supplier because of the logistical way, and there would be some positive effects coming from logistic costs, I would say.
Is there any chance you could quantify those? Is this EUR 20 million-EUR 30 million, or?
No. No, not that much. Not that much. I would say it's by far lower.
Okay. And then.
It depends how much we buy from Ukraine. Normally, our strategy is to put not everything in one basket because of logistics strategy. Our logistics strategy is that we have more suppliers in any of our raw materials.
Okay. And then.
If I may add, I think what we can expect then is perhaps a way of positive sentiment from the overall economy, and perhaps that we gain them more than this EUR 20 million you proposed there for logistics. I think this has the bigger impact.
Okay. Understood. Great. Then lastly, switching topics towards decarbonization, could you please update us on how you are going about securing the energy which you need for the new EAF modules? And if you're maybe happy to disclose that, maybe also give us a bit of a color on the actual electricity costs which you are seeing today.
I think, as I mentioned before, everything is on budget and within the time frame. We have secured our energy supply for the new EAF because we have, in the right time, got the grids for that. The energy supply is secured, I would say. Also the scrap supply, HBI supply, and so on for this first step. It's a good question because we are, at this time, discussing with our energy supplier, with our energy suppliers for contracts for the upcoming years. I haven't finally all the figures, but I think you are well aware that the electricity costs are compared to other regions, compared to the US, for example, are higher.
But maybe just in terms of the character of those countries, are those going to be fixed costs? Are those going to be flexible?
I think last year we had electricity costs in an amount of roughly EUR 450 million for the group as a whole, out of EUR 1.2 billion of energy costs. And of course, this will change. And I think what dramatically will change is the profile, how we will consume electricity as electric arc furnace come with a big, I would say, volatility. So you need it for some minutes, and then it has to go down. So the whole profile will change. And this is what our guys in the responsible department are working on right now, how we will manage this. So things will dramatically change. It's not just to supply and to procure and get energy. It's also how to treat it. So it will change our profile dramatically. But perhaps we can bring you a little bit more insight there in the future.
Yeah. I think that would be very helpful, actually, in terms. I mean, I guess ultimately, my question is, obviously, if you look at the EAF structures, which you're basically moving towards versus the current blast furnace route, and I appreciate there's always obviously lots of volatilities on both sides with iron ore coal mostly, and then electricity on the other side. I guess I'm wondering, basically, if you would just take those different EAF's positions which you're currently seeing in the market, I'm wondering how is this basically changing your cost structure. I suppose it's going to be slightly higher, but then you also obviously have the offset from having to buy less CO2.
I mean, just the pure amount of CO2 you're buying at the moment is obviously a massive burden against your current EBITDA and cash flow, which I guess, I mean, just relatively to other companies, obviously, is a burden you're carrying. You can carry it because you're financially very solid, and you're very profitable, but you're not getting anything in return for the moment, right?
Of course. We have done a lot of math, of course, in the background there. This is clear. But one thing is also clear right now. It's coal, which accounts for 50% of our energy or even more if you add coke then. And it will change. And we can give you some more insight, as I mentioned before, in future.
Okay. Thank you.
As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and turn on your telephone. There are no more questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Peter Fleischer for any closing remarks.
Thank you very much. Thank you very much for your attention and interesting discussions. If there come up any questions, please feel free to give me a call or Gerald a call. Our numbers. We will be back in the office in a few minutes. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Bye-bye.
Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for participating in the conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Goodbye.