Welcome to the Applied Materials Earnings Conference Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen only mode. I would now like to turn the conference over to Michael Sullivan, Corporate Vice President. Please go ahead, sir.
Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Applied's Q3 of fiscal 2019 earnings call, which is being recorded. Joining me are Gary Dickerson, our President and CEO and Dan Durn, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call contains forward looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ. Information concerning the risks and uncertainties is contained in Applied's most recent Form 10 Q and 8 ks filings with the SEC. Today's call also includes non GAAP financial measures.
Reconciliations to GAAP measures are found in today's earnings press release and in our reconciliation slides, which are available on the IR page of our website at appliedmaterials.com. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Gary Dickerson.
Thanks, Mike. Our results for the 3rd fiscal quarter demonstrate strong execution in an environment that remains challenging for the time being. Overall, our view of 2019 is consistent with what we've previously communicated. Within our served markets, foundrylogic spending is strong, while investments by memory and display customers are significantly lower than last year. We also remain mindful of the broader macroeconomic risks.
During this industry down cycle, my primary focus is ensuring the organization is executing on the initiatives that will put Applied Materials in the best position for the future. I believe the opportunities for Applied are compelling as powerful new demand drivers emerge in the form of IoT, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. So even though we are prudently managing discretionary spending in the near term, we are fully funding R and D to accelerate customers' roadmaps and building new products and capabilities that will underpin the company's growth in the years ahead. In today's call, I'll begin with a brief update on the near term market dynamics. I'll then talk about emerging technology trends and Applied strategy to address them.
Then I'll finish by highlighting some of our recent accomplishments. Starting with the current environment, our views of the semiconductor and display markets are largely unchanged. In memory, spending has softened slightly since our May call. On the supply side, we still see customers making disciplined investments while adjusting factory output to reduce inventory levels. On the demand side, we believe the price elasticity of NAND is starting to take effect in the form of increases in the average bits per box for both smartphones and PCs.
Based on our current visibility, we remain optimistic about 2020 with an expectation that NAND investments will recover ahead of DRAM. In foundrylogic, demand has strengthened as the year has progressed, as we see customers accelerating the ramps of their leading edge nodes. Demand for specialty nodes that serve the IoT, communications, automotive, power and image sensor markets is also driving robust investments in capacity and new technology. Taking these factors into account, our view of overall wafer fab equipment spending for 2019 remains the same, down mid to high teens on a percentage basis relative to last year. We see 2020 as a more positive setup for the industry in Applied with the start of a recovery in memory investment and sustained strength in foundrylogic spending.
In display, there are no significant changes to the outlook we provided last quarter and we still anticipate our 2019 revenue being down by about a third relative to 2018. Just as in semi, we're excited about the inflections taking place in display and the opportunities these create. We're getting ready for the future by ensuring we have the right portfolio of products to help our customers accelerate the introduction of next generation technologies, including rigid and flexible OLED and larger substrates for manufacturing. A few weeks ago, Applied hosted our 2nd AI Design Forum with more than 700 attendees representing leading companies from across the ecosystem. My main takeaway from this conference is strong alignment around 4 key themes.
1st, AI and big data are driving new approaches to computing that require new system architectures built from new types of semiconductor devices. 2nd, at a time when improvements in power, performance, area and cost are paramount, classic Moore's law scaling is running out of gas. 3rd, to address this, new approaches for semiconductor design and manufacturing are needed. In our view, the new industry playbook has 5 elements: new architectures, new devices and 3 d structures, new materials, new ways to shrink feature geometries and new ways to connect chips together. 4th, to accelerate implementation of the new playbook, companies need to connect and work together differently by breaking down traditional silos.
At Applied, we're aligning our strategy and investments around this vision of the future. For example, and provide significant PPAC benefits at the edge and in the cloud. But these 3 d devices are also incredibly challenging to make at high volume and yield. In the case of MRAM, the device is based on a film stack of more than 30 thin layers, some of which are only 8 atoms high. Missing atoms or imperfections in materials have a significant impact on the performance and endurance of the device.
To help drive adoption of these advanced memories, we recently introduced one of the most sophisticated products we've ever created, combining many of our leadership technologies in 1 integrated system. This new system has 9 different wafer processing locations and each process chamber can deposit up to 5 different materials. The entire process flow takes place under ultra high vacuum to keep impurities out and we use cryogenics and heat to vary process temperatures by 100 of degrees. All of this is critical to optimize material structures and interfaces. The system also includes unique onboard metrology that allows us to measure key properties of the materials to 1 100th of a nanometer as they are being created and modified.
This next generation of equipment that we call integrated material solutions is one of the ways Applied is bringing to bear our broad technologies and capabilities to address our customers' most complex challenges. Another area where Applied has unique technology and breadth is advanced packaging. Applied has the most comprehensive portfolio of solutions to support customers advanced packaging roadmaps and new heterogeneous integration approaches. In the past quarter, we won important process tool of record positions at leading customers, securing over 80% of the applications we competed for, including CVD, PVD, CMP and etch, where we have highly differentiated new products. Our inflection focused innovation strategy is also yielding results with our unit process tools that enable new 3 d structures, the introduction of new materials and new ways to shrink.
For example, we've been building on our strength in conductor etch for memory by winning new steps in both DRAM and NAND as well as new positions for critical etch applications in foundry logic. We're also finding new ways to deliver more value to customers through our service business. One example of this is using advanced metrology sensors, data science and simulation to speed up the transfer of new technologies from Applied's labs to customers' factories and then reduce the time it takes to optimize yield, output and cost. While growth in Applied Global Services is slightly below our prior expectations, we still anticipate our combined spares and service revenues being up this year, even as customers pull back on their capital spending and operating expenses. Before I turn the call over to Dan, I'll quickly summarize.
Our view of 2019 is relatively unchanged. Thanks to the hard work of our employees across the company, we are delivering solid performance even with the current weakness in memory and display demand. During this industry down cycle, we are focused on driving R and D programs and building new capabilities that will move the needle for customers and applied in the AI era. And we remain excited about our long term opportunities as these powerful secular demand drivers start to take shape. Now, Dan will provide his perspective on our results and outlook.
Thanks, Gary. In Q3, Applied delivered solid financial results with revenue, margins and earnings above the midpoint of our guidance. Our semi related business continues to feel stable. And while I'm still not ready to call the bottom of the cycle, I see positive leading indicators of future growth. In memory, our customers reported significant output reductions during the quarter.
They discussed inventory reductions in their end markets and demand elasticity across smartphones, PCs and servers. In foundrylogic, demand is strong, both in the leading nodes and in trailing geometries, driven by IoT, communications, automotive, power and sensor applications. We believe our markets will become significantly larger as powerful new demand drivers kick in. And we're positioning Applied to generate strong shareholder value by focusing on our 4 financial priorities. 1, we are tightly managing our overall spending while 2, fully funding and expanding our product road map and customer technology engagements to fuel growth 3, increasing the recurring revenue we earn by helping our customers maximize their returns from the installed base and 4, delivering attractive cash returns to shareholders.
For example, this quarter, we held overall spending flat, but increased the R and D portion of non GAAP OpEx to 69%. This outcome demonstrates how we're controlling our discretionary spending while fueling innovation and future growth. We announced plans to acquire to expand our presence into batch technology and accelerate innovation for our customers. This will also strengthen our services and customer support capabilities in the memory markets and throughout Asia. And we delivered on our commitment to return cash to shareholders, including while the Kokosai transaction is being reviewed.
During the quarter, we paid $0.21 per share in dividends, including the 5% increase our Board approved in March. And we used $528,000,000 to repurchase over 12,000,000 shares at an average price of around $42 per share. Over the past year, we've repurchased 68,000,000 shares at an average price below $39 and we have $2,400,000,000 remaining on our buyback authorization. In short, we're excited about our opportunities and we're focused on taking actions that will generate significant shareholder value in the years ahead. Now I'll summarize our Q3 results.
We delivered company revenue of $3,560,000,000 and non GAAP gross margin of 44%, both above the midpoint of our outlook. We held non GAAP OpEx to $746,000,000 and generated non GAAP earnings of $0.74 which was near the top end of our guidance range. Turning to the segments. Semiconductor Systems revenue was $2,270,000,000 which was above the midpoint of our outlook, and non GAAP operating margin increased to 27.5%. Global Services revenue was $931,000,000 which was below the midpoint of our outlook, and non GAAP operating margin declined to 27.8%.
I'll take a moment to explain what we're seeing in AGS. Last quarter, I explained that we have 2 kinds of service business, long term agreements that give us subscription like revenue and transactional parts and services. In Q3 and in our outlook for Q4, long term service agreement revenue is growing right in line with our forecasts. But our transactional business is being impacted by the output reductions in memory. We still expect a record year for AGS, but we're lowering our growth target to low single digits.
Revenue from our overall semi installed base business, which includes parts and services, along with upgrades and refurbs, will grow even faster and set a new record. Moving to display, Q3 revenue and operating margin both declined slightly as we expected. Next, I'll provide our Q4 guidance. We expect company revenue to be approximately $3,685,000,000 plus or minus 150,000,000 dollars And we expect non GAAP earnings to be in the range of $0.72 to $0.80 per share. Within this outlook, we expect semiconductor Systems revenue to be approximately $2,250,000,000 Services revenue should be about $955,000,000 and display revenue should be around $455,000,000 which would be up 34% sequentially.
We expect non GAAP gross margin to be about 43.5 percent and non GAAP OpEx should be about $755,000,000 Looking ahead to 2020, we continue to expect growth across our markets and a gradual U shaped recovery. While we only guide 1 quarter at a time, I'll offer you some planning assumptions for the early part of fiscal 2020 to help with your models. On a quarterly basis, we view $2,200,000,000 as a good baseline for semiconductor systems revenue until we see evidence of a recovery. We expect AGS revenue to be flat with our Q4 guidance, which is a bit better than seasonal. And we expect display to be about flat with our Q4 guidance, which demonstrates our expectation that we've passed the bottom of the display cycle.
Gross margin should remain approximately flat versus Q4 on the mix we foresee, And OpEx should increase to around $800,000,000 as we layer in annual merit increases along with R and D for new products and the new technology initiatives Gary described. In short, we see structural growth in the years ahead, positive leading indicators for 2020 and the opportunity to drive strong shareholder value by investing innovations that Applied Materials is uniquely positioned to deliver. Now Mike, let's begin the Q and A.
Thanks, Dan. Now to help us reach as many of you as we can, please ask just one question and not more than one brief follow-up. Operator, let's please begin.
Thank And our first question comes from C. J. Muse with Evercore. Your line is open.
Yes, thank you. Thanks for taking the question. I guess first question in your prepared remarks, you talked about expectations for NAND to recover sooner than DRAM. And so I guess on that front, how are you thinking about that coming back in terms of both timing and magnitude as well as we move from single stack to multi stack and there's clearly clean room availability, how are you thinking about conversions versus new capacity as that comes online into 2020 beyond?
Thanks, C. J. Maybe I'll start and see if Gary wants to offer anything from a technology standpoint towards the end. So when we think about the memory market, and you called out NAND specifically, but let me broaden the comments just a little bit more to encompass the entire memory market. We don't expect to see a recovery in 2019.
We see it as a 2020 event. And as you pointed out, we expect to see NAND first, then followed by DRAM. If we think about where we sit today from an overall WFE standpoint, the memory markets are clearly down in 2019 versus where we were in 2020. So this is clearly a correction year. But we are seeing early signs of improvement.
Output across the industry has come down. We are undershipping true end market demand from a supply standpoint as we exit the year. This is bringing our customers' inventories down. It's bringing our customers' customers' inventories down. And we do see the early signs of demand elasticity beginning to kick in and signs of price stability.
When we net all of this together, we definitely see 2020 as a recovery year in the memory market. And again, we see it as a NAND led event followed by DRAM. In terms of magnitude, I think it's premature to be point specific on any individual market right now into 2020, but we like the setup of what we see. When we take a step back and we think about the long term in these markets beyond 2020, we do see that there is a data explosion as the data economy kicks in and the value of that data is increasingly going up as companies learn how to monetize it. We see capital intensity going up.
We see new forms of memories, which really plays to our strengths in materials. We see our customer base being rational and disciplined. We net all that together. We think there's Yes, maybe
Yes, maybe I can add something relative to our position in memory and also in NAND. I think many of you know that we have a much more balanced overall share across memory and foundrylogic. In memory, we increased our share of total spending from less than 15% in 2013 to around 20% today, and we're confident we're going to continue to drive gains into the future. Another thing that's really positive for Applied is memory is very much driven by materials enabled scaling. And I think everyone's aware, capital intensity has been increasing.
We are also engaged with all the major memory companies with integrated material solutions. Again, it's all about new structures, new materials, how far NAND, you can scale vertically. So we have very strong pull from customers for new materials, new products to enable, their cost and performance roadmaps. In NAND specifically, we're winning new etch applications in NAND. And to get more layers in NAND, one of the most important things is new materials, especially high selectivity hard masks, where we have very strong capability.
I talked last quarter about hard masks that increased etch selectivity by 50%, and we're seeing strong adoption of those new capabilities across multiple customers with new steps that give us significant TAM growth. So again, we've been increasing our share in NAND. We have new materials and new products that make us very optimistic. We're going to continue to drive strong momentum into the future.
Thanks, C. J. J.
Rice:] Thank you.
J. Rice:] Thank you. And our next question comes from Toshiya Hara with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the solid execution. Gary, I was hoping you could talk a little bit about what you're seeing in China from a technology progression perspective, both on the DRAM side as well as the NAND side. It continues to be a pretty big part of your business as well as your peers' businesses in the near term as well. So if you can talk about the rate of progress on the technology front, as well as your expectations in terms of WFE for 2019 and preliminary thoughts on 2020, that would be helpful.
And then I've got a follow-up.
Okay, great. Yes, thanks for the question. So our view on China is similar to what we communicated before. We don't see any major inflection in spending. 2019, we see relatively flat versus 2018.
If you look at domestic China, our view is a little stronger over the past few months with some increases in memory. For the year as a whole, we see slightly higher spending on foundrylogic versus memory with foundrylogic focused on IoT, communications, sensors, those types of devices. In our display business in China, we believe that's going to be down roughly in line with our global display forecast. Overall in China, we have a great position, semi service, we've been in China for 35 years. The display is a great team for us, very, very strong customer relationships and engagements.
Relative to the technology progression, I don't really think again anything has changed from what we communicated before. As I said, we believe the foundry logic on the trailing nodes is where we will see over half of the domestic And we see the investment there as being And we see the investment there as being rational and aligned with the increase in demand for those types of products. Memory is a those are very difficult technologies and it's a long road to be able to produce those technologies at a competitive level for performance and cost. As we've communicated before, we don't see any big hockey sticks. I really don't see much different than what we saw before.
We think it's going to be a long journey and incremental spending going forward.
Great. Thank you. And then as my follow-up, I wanted to ask about market share. If we take your October quarter guide for the semiconductor systems business and the guide from Dan into the January quarter, I guess we get a calendar 2019 segment revenue number that's slightly better than what you described for overall WFE. Is the slight market share gain implied in your guidance a function of your SAM acting a little bit better than prior years?
Or are you actually picking up share within the markets that you serve? Thank you.
Yes. Thanks, Toshiya. So there's no question 2019 is a more favorable setup for Applied. And I have really very strong confidence that we're in a great position to keep the momentum going into the future. If you look at the 3rd party data for overall spending, you'll see that we've been on a trend of higher or flat share all the way back to 2012 except last year where the mix was very heavy in places like batch processing, dielectric, gas, litho, where we don't participate.
So absolutely, the mix is more favorable for us this year. So not going to make any specific predictions, but the setup for sure is much better for us this year. We're winning many head to heads and especially in new applications. We have a very strong pipeline of new products, including products that expand our positions in the markets that we don't currently serve. Some of those products are already gaining traction with major customers.
I spend a lot of my time with customer and R and D leaders. That's what I love to do more than anything else. And in discussions with them, it's clear that they're struggling to deliver improvements in power, performance and cost. And I think it's also clear, and this was evident at the AI Design Forum last month, that the future is not going to look like the past, that classic two d scaling isn't working. In all my interactions with R and D leaders, they talk about new materials, 3 d structures, new ways to connect chips together, new ways to drive cost.
And I really deeply believe Applied is in the best position we've ever been in to enable this new playbook with the breadth of products we have to create, shape, modify and analyze new structures. Our combined capability is unique, enables us to deliver integrated material solutions. We talked last year about 1000x improvement in leakage current. Talked this year about this amazing MRAM capability. And those are new ways to drive performance in power, performance area and cost.
And also, we're currently engaged with all major customers in memory and foundry with these new integrated materials solutions. So that combination of new IMS solutions, our capability to enable the new playbook, new products put us in a great position to accelerate roadmaps for customers and drive future growth for Applied. So again, I like the setup for 2019 and also into the future.
Thanks, Toshiya. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Atif Malik with Citi. Your line is open.
Hi, thanks for taking my questions and good job on execution. Gary, a couple of memory makers have talked about CapEx being down for next year. You sound optimistic on NAND and your peers have said the same. How do we reconcile these 2? And what is your view based on is it based on recovery in memory pricing or shell availability?
Hi, Atif. This is Dan. I think I'll jump in and take this. So, all we can bake into our forecast and the expectations we set into the market are the things we see, the conversations we have with our customers about expectations out into the future as well as the bottom up modeling we do from an industry and end market device standpoint and the consumption of bits in those boxes as well as top down economic modeling and forecasting. And as you can imagine, our forecast comes together.
It's a triangulation of those events, but we spend a lot of time talking to customers. And based on all of the information that we have to date, our best view out into the future is for 2020 to be a recovery year in the memory market and for WFE to be up year over year. That said, in this environment, we are setting an expectation and we think it's prudent to do this, setting an expectation for a gradual U shape recovery. If the industry does better than we're currently contemplating, then we as a company will benefit in a very material way and we like that setup. But when we net it all out, to us, it's a matter of when, not if.
And in our view, it's a 2020 event for memory.
Thank you, Dan.
Thank you. Our next question comes from John Pitzer with Credit Suisse. Your line is open.
Yes. Good afternoon, guys. Congratulations on the solid results given all the uncertainty in the macro. Gary, I'm wondering if you could spend a little bit more time talking about the market opportunity for sort of the N minus 1 at the foundries being driven by industrial, auto, IoT. How big do you think that is?
And I guess importantly, with trailing edge nodes staying stronger longer, what does that do for reuse at the foundries at leading edge? And is that actually driving a bigger end spend because reuse is slowing down?
Yes. Thanks for the question. Yes, I think for sure we see that this specialty market growth is going to continue to increase for the future. If you think about people talk about a trillion connected devices in generating significant amounts of data, that's right smack dab in the middle of that type of market. And this is a really great growth opportunity for Applied.
We have a great portfolio of products across 203 100 millimeter technology. If you look at foundrylogic, again, maybe some people don't understand the dynamics, about 50% is growing in areas like IoT, communications, auto, power devices and sensors. And innovation there is really driven by materials innovations. So again, those are areas where Applied has a significant strength. We've increased focus on these markets, and we have a great team of leaders across the company to work with customers to enable their roadmaps.
I mean, I personally have visited a lot of these key customers over the last 2 or 3 months, tremendous pull for the technologies that we're developing. I'll give you one example of a situation that happened this last quarter. We want 2 thirds of the revenue opportunities that a major customer in this specialty market where the selections are very sticky over many, many years. Once you're qualified, you're in for a long period of time. So again, that was a case where in terms of the spending, we were winning a huge percentage of those opportunities.
And this is again all about materials, innovations and structures. And we have a lot of technologies currently that are unique in for these particular markets. And we have an increased focus there in developing new technologies. Our culture is really focused on being a preferred strategic partner for all of our different customers, enabling their technology roadmaps, enabling their future for those different markets. Going forward, this is a great opportunity for us to partner with these customers.
The breadth of technologies combined with integrated material solutions, I think really puts us in a really good position.
And John, just to follow-up and add a little bit to what Gary said, which talks about reuse, and the implications that has for spend on the leading edge, I do think we're seeing a different pattern evolve in the industry. When I walked in the front door a couple of years ago, I think we had a point of view on what the total capacity footprint in 28 nanometers was for the industry and that has gone up significantly in the last couple of years. We're looking at mature nodes and the way the industry used to work, as you know, you'd introduce a new node, you'd have a big investment cycle to put the capacity statement in place and then you'd see the investment level fall off on that node. And then our customers would opportunistically look to reuse equipment as they build out the next node. I think what we're seeing is investment profiles many years after the introduction of the node impact the rate of reuse as these more mature nodes continue to grow in size relative to our original expectations.
So we really like the way the industry is broadening and diversifying and the implications that has long terms on the attractiveness of this market for us.
That's helpful. Dan, quickly as my follow-up, I know you guys only guide 1 quarter out, but you gave us some sort of signpost for entering fiscal 2020, which would suggest that revenue and gross margin kind of flattish at these levels, but OpEx going up. I'm just kind of curious, are you clearly signaling to us that that op margins start off a little bit weaker into fiscal year 2020? Or are these more rounding errors? And if it's the former, when do you start to reestablish kind of operating leverage in the model?
Thanks, John. So a little perspective on how we view OpEx and operating margin and maybe the commentary gets at the point that you're asking. So this is a company we're very focused on increasing operating margin percentage over time. I think what you saw in the most recent quarter is a very disciplined approach to the OpEx. We're compressing discretionary spend and we're channeling more of our OpEx towards the R and D engine, the things that are going to fuel growth at the company over time.
And so 69 percent is a record high for the company and we feel good about that discipline. What you see profiling into Q1 is the annual merit increase that we get every year, but it's also a statement around the opportunities we see. Moore's Law is hitting a wall. Gary has talked about a new playbook that is going to increasingly define the power performance roadmap of this industry. That creates an enormous set of opportunities for us.
We're going to invest in R and D. We're going to drive growth and drive leadership into this industry over the next decade as it fundamentally inflects and drives the power performance road map in a very different way than we've seen historically. The way from where we sit today, we expect our semi business to be up year over year. We expect our services business to be up off of these levels year over year, and we expect our display business to also grow into next year. And as the industry recovers and we take our company structurally larger, I think you're going to see the operating margins expand as we grow the company.
And the investments that we're making today to drive that future leadership should allow us to outperform as that industry recovers.
Thanks, John.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Harlan Sur with JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Good afternoon and nice job on the quarterly execution. On the strong sequential growth outlook in display in Q4 and the sustained levels into early next fiscal year, Can you guys just help us understand the mix large screen versus mobile OLED? And how do you see that mix as you look into next fiscal year?
Sure, absolutely. All
right. Yes, thanks for the question. So let me give color on the display business and this gets at your question. As we said in the prepared remarks, we still see display down about 1 third versus 2019. We don't guide display fab equipment, but this is basically what customers are telling us about next year.
We see 2020 for Applied being higher than 20 19. We also expect TV investment to And so we have pretty good visibility into that part of the market. And so we have pretty good visibility into that part of the market. And we do expect mobile OLED to increase as percentage of the overall market next year. So we do see the overall display business being up next year.
Longer term, we believe the market is still going to be cyclical, but we continue to be optimistic about the market based on trends, including TV size and build out of Gen 10.5 that's going to take many years, the mobile OLED conversion and eventually innovations like RGB OLED TV, foldable smartphones, all of those different areas. For Applied, the adoption of OLED, I think many of you know, is also more capital intensive. So as those technologies are adopted in more types of devices, that's good for us from a capital intensity standpoint. We're also investing to drive new products to expand into very large TAM growth areas. We're not going to give any more color today about those specific products.
But again, the pull from customers is still very strong and we're making progress in those areas. Together, take all this together, we see good opportunities to drive growth in our display business into 2020 beyond.
Great. Thanks for the insights there. And then maybe as a follow-up to one of the prior questions. On your new MRAM and storage class memory PVD platforms, just given the increasing content in microcontrollers, in IoT, industrial and automotive applications and the growing need for higher embedded memory density per MCU, seems like there is just as much opportunity on legacy semi MCU processes as there is for high performance storage class memory architectures. Has the team tried to size the SAM opportunity here for your 2 new platforms sort of looking out over the next 2 to 3 years?
Yes. Thanks for the question. So we think this market is going to start small. It's around $100,000,000 for us so far. But as you mentioned, it's very strategic in future customer applications.
We see this type of device moving from NOR flash replacement to bigger applications like L3 cache replacement, specialty DRAM replacement. Again, it's not something that's going to ramp overnight, but we do see incremental growth in the market. And then I think for us, when I was at Semicon and AIDF, this was one of the things for me personally I was most excited to talk about, because when you think about these new devices, I think many of you know, it takes many, many, many years to go from a single structure that you publish a paper with certain kinds of performance to making billions of those devices at the right cost, high yield, speed, power, endurance, all of those things. And so talking about the system that we had at SEMICON, you have all of this amazing technology into 1 integrated material solution in ultra high vacuum. You have a structure, it's like an atomic layer 3 d printer almost, where you have a structure with more than 30 layers, some only 8 atoms high, 10 different materials, temperatures on the wafer that range about 500 degrees C, and ability to measure the key properties of the materials as they're being created to 1 100th of a nanometer.
And all of this is really critical to optimize the material structures and interfaces. So again, certainly the better you can drive the performance, yield, reliability, the more applications you can win and faster the market ramps. And so what we're excited about and certainly the companies that we're working with, they're very excited about is being able to scale a technology like this into high volume, high yield and right cost and right performance. So again, we see this market small today, but certainly relative to future compute architectures, it is very, very, very important.
Our next question comes from Timothy Arcuri with UBS. Your line is open.
Thanks a lot. I had a question on service. I don't know if Gary you want to take it or if Dan you want to take it. But if I look at July, service was like $60,000,000 light in July and then October, you had been saying kind of like high single digit for the year. So that would imply that the October number is like coming in about $150,000,000 light of where you thought it would be.
So that's like a $200,000,000 number over a 6 month period. So that's like 10% of the entire AGS segment revenue. But I think you had also said previously that the spares and service portion of AGS is like half of the revenue. So really it's like 20% of the spares and service portion. I get the memory production cuts, but that's a huge number for a business that I think people consider to be quite stable.
And I think your peers are sort of seeing a little bit better trends there. So I'm wondering if you can talk about that. Thanks.
Thanks, Tim. Let me share with you a little bit of my views about the business and hopefully that it gives some color and perspective. If we take a look at our services business, this is a business that team has really tuned the strategy. We've got a great strategy, strong execution over the last, call it, 4 years. It's a business we've grown at a compound rate of about 15%.
Last year, we grew it at over 20%. This year, our expectation coming into the year was high single digits. As we look at the underlying components of the business, there's an element of the business that's long term service agreements that's more subscription like in its revenue. As we look at performance of that business in Q3 and Q4, it's profiling exactly like we thought. And so a mid teens grower into Q3 and Q4.
When we look at the other part of the business, the other half of the business being more transactional, spares and service related that has a connection to industry utilization and factory outputs. Clearly, we saw a fall off in Q3 and Q4 as the memory industry has structurally brought down its factory output to work through the inventory correction. We initially thought this was going to be a flattish business for the year. It now looks like it's down low double digits for the year. The combination of a mid teens grower and down low double digits gets you a low single digit grower as an overall business.
We were to classify our business similar to others in the industry, in addition to growing low single digits, added our 300 millimeter
refurbs and upgrades to the business. This is an all
time record year for us and it's something that's growing quite a bit stronger than the segment reported services business. So I don't I wouldn't necessarily look at our absolute performance or relative performance and think that there's something deficient in the way the business is profiling. We think we've got a great business. The team is executing well. And as industry utilization recovers into next year, should provide a nice leg of growth to the business going forward.
Yes, maybe just let me add a little bit of color on the service business. As Dan talked about, certainly there's been a reduction in wafer starts and you also mentioned this in the question with memory customers. So that's impacting the spare parts business. But one thing that's been a major change in our strategy starting in 2013 was to drive more subscription type revenue with customers and that's been very successful. If you go back to 2013, we had net 0 adds in terms of service contracts.
Since then, that part of the business has been growing very, very fast. Dan talked about even in this year with WFE down a fair amount, that part of our business is still growing at a very high rate and that subscription revenue from longer term agreements is now larger than our transactional spares and service business. And that's really because we continue to see strong pull from customers accelerating R and D, accelerating fab ramps, optimizing yield output and cost and high volume manufacturing. We also have a very strong strategy in data analytics. We have over thousands of tools connected in customers' fabs.
That's creating value for customers today and that creates a great opportunity for us to continue to drive that data enabled strategy to create value for customers and also to drive growth for Applied. Just one more data point. If you look at our spares and service business, and again, this is separating out upgrades, refurbishments and other things that are counted by some people. If you look at just our subscription revenue and our spare parts business, transactional business, that business has grown 27% over the last 2 years with wafer fab equipment being flat. So that shows that even in a case where wafer fab equipment is not growing, that service business is growing.
So, we're very optimistic that we're going to drive this business at a high rate going forward at Applied and also create more value for our customers.
Awesome, Gary. Thank you for that. Just as a follow-up, there was a major memory maker in China running around Flash Memory Summit. They were talking about spending $10,000,000,000 on WFE between 2019 2020, very, very big numbers that I don't think anybody's modeling. Can you talk just more generally about China memory efforts and whether next year could be a pretty big year from the indigenous China guys?
Thanks.
Yes. We're not really giving any color on 2020 right now. I think what I had said earlier on the call relative to 2019 is that we see 2019 relatively flat with 2018. And I honestly don't see a big hockey stick. I've said this in the past over the last few years also.
I
haven't seen a big hockey stick. I think that the spending certainly in foundry logic is rational around IoT sensors, communications, all of those kinds of devices. That's a little over half of the domestic spending this year. And certainly, we believe that there will be some incremental spending, but we're not going to give any color on the call today relative to forecasting 2020 for China.
Okay, Gary. Thanks so much.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Kirsh Shankar with Cowen and Company. Your line is open.
Yes. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I have 2 of them. Dan, given that your semi business is stabilizing at these revenue levels, but the mix is shifting more towards foundry, logic versus memory, I would have thought your gross margin profile would have been better.
Can you just help eliminate some of that and what's going on the gross margin side? And then as a follow-up, I'll ask it right away. You guys gave some color on FY 2020 display revenues relative to 2019. Given that you have almost 9 months lead time visibility, how should we think of FY 2020 display revenues relative to FY 2018 where you did about $2,500,000,000 Thank you.
Thanks, Krish. Let's take them in order. First, on the gross margin and the foundrylogic showing signs of strength. Let me start by saying this is a company that's laser focused on driving gross margins up over time. And if we were talking about a business mix from maybe a few years ago, I think maybe we'd be seeing incrementally higher gross margins.
Let me help you a little bit with some of the mix factors that we see going into gross margin given who we are today. So as we take a look at our services and display business and growing it as a part of our portfolio, we know that those two businesses and we've done great job growing them, those two businesses have a gross margin that's lower than the corporate average, but we expect each of those businesses and we expect each of those businesses to be up as we look into 2020. And then within our semi portfolio, our leadership businesses are doing really, really well. But the profile of our semi business is changing as we grow. And there's a couple of things I would point to.
First, our etch footprint, these are gross margins, products with gross margins that are not as high as maybe other parts of the portfolio, but we're doing a great job driving that business. We're expanding that business into new opportunities and beyond memory into foundrylogic. And that certainly changes the profile of our business as we grow forward. 2nd thing I'd point to, and we talked about it on this call, is foundrylogic spend diversifying? There was a time a decade ago when it was 90% on the leading edge and then it evolved to eightytwenty, sixtyforty.
And now for the last 3 years, 2017, 2018 2019, it's fully split fifty-fifty between leading edge technologies and trailing node geometries. And where we compete in the trailing node geometries with differentiated equipment and are key enablers of some of the technologies and products that are being brought to market. That's super attractive business for us. But there's also opportunities in that market where we compete with 300 millimeter refurbs, 200 millimeter systems. And while those products offer really attractive operating margins and cash flow, the gross margins might be a lower a little bit lower than we see in some of the other businesses we pursue.
So we're going to continue to stay focused. We're going to continue to drive gross margin over time, particularly as we see the industry recover. We drive revenue higher. From this point going forward, we do think we're going to be able to grow the semi business into next year, grow the AGS business into next year and the display business. So we're going to stay focused on execution and we feel good about how the business is profiling.
Yes, and then the second part of your question was on display. Could you repeat the question? I apologize, I lost
Yes, I can do it. I mean, basically on display relative to 2020, what we said earlier, we think 2020 is going to be a little higher than 2019. I don't think we're going to give anything more specific at this point in time.
Thanks folks.
Thanks, Krish.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Vivek Arya with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open.
Thanks for taking my question. I think when you started the call, you mentioned that you're still not comfortable calling the bottom. And I'm curious what in the environment is preventing you from doing that? Is it order visibility? Is it the macro environment?
And from what you see, where do you think your memory customers will start to add incremental capacity?
Yes. Thanks, Vivek. I think I'll come back to the comments we made a little earlier that in an environment defined by what we see today, we do think it's an elevated risk profile around some macro environment as well as geopolitical. I just think it's prudent in an environment that's characterized like the one we're in to set expectations in a modest way. We have conversations with customers.
If I would give a direct read through on those conversations, I think you would see expectations set at a different level. But I just and again and come back to an environment like this, I just don't think that's a prudent place to be. So we want to set expectations in a more modest way. We're setting expectations for gradual and you shaped off these levels. Certainly, if the industry recovers faster than where we're setting the expectations, given our broad portfolio and how we're positioned in all of the markets, this is a company that's going to benefit in a very material way if that happens.
So we feel good about the position. We feel good about finding stability in the business. And we do think it's just a matter of when, not if, and we'll be ready to take advantage of those opportunities when they materialize.
Okay. And as a quick follow-up, on the market share side, I know last year you guys were down 2 points, but you're starting to recover that in recent quarters. Heading into 2020, which areas do you think AMAT is best positioned to gain share? And what will be the impact of EUV in that share progression and how your TAM is impacted? Thank you.
Yes. Thanks for the question. So if you look at EUV, we still see Applied growing and patterning and we also see a growth in overall WFE even as EUV finds areas of adoption. As we've communicated before, last year EUV was a headwind. As you look forward, you have to look at different segments.
EUV has a very small impact on memory. When memory recovers, that's going to be very positive for Applied relative to the TAM opportunity. Memory is really about materials enabled scaling, and we have gained share in memory, very deep engagements with our customers and good opportunities to continue to drive share gains. In NAND, we have great opportunity to enable 3 d scaling. I talked about new hard masks.
Our etch position continues to grow. In DRAM, they're adding metal gate in the periphery, and this is where we have high share as those processes are adopted. I talked earlier about IoT, communication, sensors. That's an area where I talked about we won 2 thirds of the TAM opportunity here recently with a customer and that's about 50% of the foundrylogic spending. So we have momentum in all of these different areas.
And then the other thing I would say is that we've talked about this new playbook, new architectures, new materials, new structures, new ways to connect things together, and new ways to shrink. We really have new technologies and new products in many of those different areas. And so I've given color today on the call about many of those different opportunities. And that's also why we're investing more going forward. We have a very strong point of view.
The market driven by AI big data is going to be strong in the future. We believe that the new playbook with new structures, new materials, new ways to connect devices, all of those areas are areas where Applied has unique technologies, unique capabilities. We have products that some of which are already seeing adoption with customers, where we have traction. We're going to invest in those areas. And my main focus as CEO is to make sure we're in the right position when those markets grow in the future.
Okay. Thank you.
Thanks, Vivek. And we're getting close to the end of our scheduled time. So, Dan, would you like to help us close the call?
Thanks, Mike. Sure. Let me just share a couple of quick comments to end the call. First, I'm encouraged. I'm encouraged by the stability we're seeing in our business and encouraged by the positive leading indicators that we're seeing in memory.
But I'm still not ready to call the bottom, especially given the macro risks that we need to keep an eye on. At the same time, we've been in this industry a very long time and long enough to know that something new and big is happening in computing, and it's happening just as Moore's Law is slowing down. So we see growth coming, and we believe Applied is in a special position to help this industry. So we're going to invest. We're going to create value and grow this company and outperform the market.
And finally, we're going to stay close to investors. Gary and I, we're going to be hosting some meetings here in Santa Clara throughout the quarter. And I personally look forward to seeing many of you, in the beginning of September in New York at the Citi Conference. So Mike, let's go ahead and close the call.
Great. Thanks, Dan. And we'd like to thank everybody for joining us today. A replay of this call will be available on our website by 5 o'clock Pacific Time. And we would like to thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes the program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.