Greetings, and welcome to the AMD First Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to introduce Ruth Cotter, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing, Human Resources, and Investor Relations. Ruth, please go ahead.
Thank you, and welcome to AMD's first quarter 2020 financial results conference call. By now, you should have had the opportunity to review a copy of our earnings release and slides. If you have not reviewed these documents, they can be found on the investor relations page of AMD's website, amd.com. Participants on today's call are Dr. Lisa Su, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Devinder Kumar, our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer. This is a live call and will be replayed via webcast on our website. Before we begin today, please note that our annual shareholder meeting will be held on Thursday, the May 7th as a virtual event accessible from amd.com. We will also be attending several virtual Wall Street events during the second quarter, including the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference on Thursday, May 28th.
Our second quarter 2020 quiet time is expected to begin at the close of business on Friday, the June 12th . Today's discussions contain forward-looking statements based on the environment as we currently see it. Those statements are based on current beliefs, assumptions, and expectations, speak only as of the current date, and as such, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. We will refer primarily to non-GAAP financial metrics during this call, except for revenue and segment operational results, which are on a GAAP basis. The non-GAAP financial measures referenced are reconciled to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in today's press release posted on amd.com. Please refer to the cautionary statement in our press release for more information on risks related to any forward-looking statements that we may make.
You will also find detailed discussions about our risk factors in our filings with the SEC, and in particular, AMD's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28th, 2019. Now, with that, I'd like to hand the call over to Lisa. Lisa?
Thank you, Ruth. Good afternoon to all those listening in today. Before covering our quarterly results, I wanted to provide some comments addressing our response to COVID-19. First, I want to recognize the toll the pandemic has taken on the world. The breadth and speed at which COVID-19 has changed the world since our last earnings call has been staggering. I want to thank the countless healthcare professionals and essential workers serving on the front lines every day. At AMD, our first priority has been to protect the health and safety of our employees. We have transitioned the vast majority of our more than 12,000 employees worldwide to working from home while ensuring we maintain focus on reliably supplying our customers with the products and services their businesses depend on.
We are also supporting the communities we call home through financial and personal protective equipment donations and providing our technology to accelerate medical research. More than ever, the pandemic has placed technology at the forefront of how we work, learn, shop, and connect, and we are proud to be providing many of the components powering these essential technologies. Against that backdrop, we performed well in the first quarter. Revenue increased 40% year-over-year to $1.79 billion, as demand for 7 nm Ryzen, Radeon, and EPYC processors drove record first quarter revenue and our highest gross margin in eight years. I'm pleased with our execution in the quarter, as we quickly adapted our global operations to navigate pockets of supply chain disruption and addressed geographic and market demand shifts caused by COVID-19.
Turning to our computing and graphics segment, first quarter segment revenue increased 73% year-over-year to $1.44 billion, driven by increased Ryzen and Radeon processor adoption. We saw some softness based on the COVID-19 situation in China that impacted PC-related sales in the first quarter. While both component and system demand were relatively strong at online vendors, offline channel sales were weaker than expected as many retail locations across China were closed for much of the quarter. PC demand in the rest of the world was strong, offsetting the softness in China. Client processor revenue grew significantly year-over-year, as strong Ryzen processor demand resulted in significant double-digit percentage increases in unit shipments and ASP. As a result, we believe we gained client unit market share for the 10th straight quarter.
In desktop, overall demand for our latest Ryzen 3000 and prior generation Ryzen 2000 processor families was strong, both of which continue to top retailer best-seller lists and have more than 50% share of premium processor sales at many top global e-tailers. In mobile, unit shipments increased by a strong double-digit percentage year-over-year. We set a record for quarterly notebook processor revenue, driven by sustained demand for our previous generation offerings and the ramp of the first Ryzen Mobile 4000 design wins. Initial consumer notebooks featuring our new Ryzen 4000 processors launched to strong demand based on reviews that demonstrated their performance and battery life leadership for ultra-thin and gaming notebooks. We also gained momentum in the commercial market, winning multiple large-scale deployments as Lenovo announced new ThinkPads and HP launched commercial class ProBooks powered by our latest Ryzen 4000 mobile processors.
We are on track to accelerate our mobile growth this year as Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and other OEMs are expected to launch more than 135 new Ryzen-powered consumer and commercial notebooks over the coming quarters. In graphics, first quarter unit shipments and revenue both grew by a double-digit percentage year-over-year, driven largely by sales of our Radeon RX 5000 series, desktop and notebook GPUs. Desktop channel sales increased based on solid demand for both 7 nm RDNA graphics cards and previous generation Radeon RX 500 series GPUs. In mobile, demand for notebooks powered by our Radeon 5000M mobile GPUs, including the latest Apple MacBook Pro and other gaming notebooks, drove a richer mix as customers transitioned their platforms to our new RDNA mobile offerings. Development of our RDNA 2 GPUs continues to progress well.
We are on track to launch our next-generation gaming GPUs later this year with a 50% performance per watt increase compared to our current offerings. In the data center, Microsoft Azure introduced new virtual machines optimized for visualization workloads, powered by our Radeon Instinct MI25 GPUs. Microsoft is using our differentiated virtualization technology to partition a GPU for the first time in the same way they partition multi-core CPUs, allowing customers to tailor the GPU capability to meet the needs of their specific workload. Turning to our Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment, revenue of $348 million decreased 21% year-over-year as lower semi-custom revenue more than offset a significant increase in server revenue. As expected, semi-custom product revenue was negligible in the quarter, as Sony and Microsoft both reduced inventory in advance of next generation console launches.
We expect semi-custom revenue to increase in the second quarter and be heavily weighted towards the second half of the year as we ramp production to support the holiday launches of the new PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X consoles. In server, unit shipments grew by a double-digit percentage sequentially and more than tripled year-over-year as we continue gaining momentum across cloud, enterprise, and HPC customers. We saw particular strength with cloud providers introducing new instances and accelerating current deployments. Microsoft Azure, Google, and IBM all announced new offerings powered by second-generation EPYC processors, highlighted by Google launching multiple general purpose VMs and Microsoft rolling out an all AMD virtual desktop offering that also includes Radeon Instinct GPUs. Several cloud providers accelerated their infrastructure deployments to address rising demand from the growing number of users working and schooling from home.
For instance, one of our large cloud customers was able to deploy 10,000 second-gen EPYC servers in less than 10 days to support the surge in demand for their collaboration services. In the enterprise, we expanded our second-gen EPYC processor portfolio with new high-frequency processors that expand our performance leadership to advanced modeling, database, and hyper-converged workloads. With these new offerings, our second-gen EPYC processor family now includes both the highest performance per core and performance per socket processors in the industry. We continue winning in HPC, highlighted by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory announcing they selected next-generation AMD EPYC CPUs and Radeon Instinct GPUs to power their El Capitan supercomputer, which is expected to deliver more than two exaflops of computing performance when it is deployed in early 2023.
We are incredibly proud that two of the three publicly announced U.S. exascale supercomputing systems will exclusively use AMD CPUs and GPUs, clearly positioning AMD as the exascale computing leader based on our high-performance computing and graphics technologies and software capabilities. In closing, our long-term strategy and growth drivers remain unchanged. Although there are some near-term uncertainties in the demand environment, we are well positioned to navigate through this situation. We have a solid financial foundation, and our product portfolio is very well positioned across the PC, gaming, and data center markets. While demand indicators across commercial, education, and data center infrastructure markets are strong, we expect some softness in consumer demand in the second half of the year, depending on how overall macroeconomic conditions evolve.
We remain on track to launch our next generation Zen 3 CPUs and RDNA 2 GPUs in late 2020 and believe we can deliver another year of strong revenue growth and margin expansion based on the strength of our product portfolio and the diversity of markets we serve. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Devinder to provide some additional color on our first quarter financial performance. Devinder?
Thank you, Lisa, good afternoon, everyone. We performed well in the first quarter as we navigated a challenging environment as a result of the ongoing impact of COVID-19. First quarter revenue was $1.79 billion, up 40% from a year-ago and down 16% from the prior quarter. Year-over-year growth was driven by strong sales of Ryzen and EPYC processors and Radeon products, partially offset by lower semi-custom sales. Gross margin was 46%, up 490 basis points from a year-ago, driven by Ryzen and EPYC processor sales. Operating expenses were $584 million, compared to $545 million a year-ago, primarily due to increased investments in R&D and go-to-market activities. Operating income was $236 million, up $152 million from a year-ago, driven by revenue growth and a greater percentage of Ryzen and EPYC processor sales, while operating margin increased to 13% as compared to 7% a year-ago.
Net income was $222 million, up from $62 million a year ago, and diluted earnings per share was $0.18 per share, compared to $0.06 per share a year ago. Turning to the business segment results. Computing and Graphics segment revenue was $1.44 billion, up 73% year-over-year, driven by Ryzen processor and Radeon product channel sales growth. Computing and Graphics segment operating income was $262 million, or 18% of revenue, compared to $16 million a year ago, driven by significantly higher revenue. Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment revenue was $348 million, down 21% from $441 million the prior year due to the expected decline in Semi-Custom sales, partially offset by strong data center growth. EESC segment had a loss of $26 million, compared to operating income of $68 million a year ago, which included the benefit of a $60 million licensing gain. Turning to the balance sheet.
Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities total $1.4 billion. In addition, in early April, we took the precautionary step to draw down $200 million from our $500 million revolving line of credit. Inventory was $1.1 billion, up 8% from the prior quarter. On a trailing 12-month basis, adjusted EBITDA was $1.2 billion, resulting in gross leverage of 0.5 X. Free cash flow was - $150 million in the first quarter, an improvement of $155 million from the prior year. Cash flow from operations was - $65 million, an improvement of $148 million from a year ago. Let me turn to the outlook for the second quarter of 2020. Today's outlook is based on current expectations and contemplates the current COVID-19 environment and customer demand signals.
We expect revenue to be approximately $1.85 billion, ±$100 million, an increase of approximately 21% year-over-year, and an increase of approximately 4% sequentially. The year-over-year increase is expected to be driven by strong growth in Ryzen and EPYC processor sales. The sequential increase is driven primarily by EPYC processor and semi-custom sales. In addition, for Q2 2020, we expect non-GAAP gross margin to be approximately 44% due to higher semi-custom revenue, non-GAAP operating expenses to be approximately $600 million, non-GAAP interest expense, taxes, and other to be approximately $20 million, and the diluted share count in the second quarter is expected to be approximately 1.23 billion shares. For the full year 2020, despite expectations of weaker COVID-19 related consumer demand in the second half of the year, we expect annual revenue growth of approximately 25%, ±5 percentage points.
In addition, we expect non-GAAP gross margin to be approximately 45%, unchanged from prior guidance, and non-GAAP operating expenses to be approximately 29% of revenue. In closing, while the market environment has become more challenging given the impact of COVID-19, our first quarter results demonstrate the strength of our business model. Notwithstanding some near-term demand uncertainties, our long-term strategy is unchanged, and we are well-positioned with our competitive products and the strength of our balance sheet to navigate today's environment. As I finish, I would also like to take this opportunity to thank all our employees for their dedication, flexibility, and focus in these extraordinary times. With that, I'll turn it back to Ruth for the question and answer session. Ruth?
Thank you, Devinder. Operator, if you could poll the audience for questions, please.
Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to be placed in the question queue, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing star one. One moment please, while we poll for questions. Our first question today is coming from Matt Ramsay from Cowen. Your line is now live.
Thank you. Good afternoon, everybody, and hope everyone at AMD is doing well considering the interesting times we live in. Lisa, I wanted to start with a couple of questions on the server business. I guess one of which is, the EESC results in the quarter that you just printed were a bit below, at least where I had modeled them. Maybe you could talk a bit about how you feel the EPYC business is tracking toward that 10% target you guys had set for the second quarter. I noticed in Devinder's comments on the June quarter guidance, some of the upside sequentially is going to be driven by EPYC. How are you tracking against that?
The last little piece is I keep getting more and more questions still about the timing of Milan, and I know you guys reiterated that would be this year at the Analyst Day. If that's still the case, just let us know. Thanks.
Absolutely, Matt. Thank you, and appreciate the question. Look, we are very pleased with the progress in our server business. I think if you look at sort of the progress we've made, there were a number of key things that we wanted to see happen. What we saw in the quarter that we just finished, in the first quarter, we actually saw a very nice acceleration of the cloud business as we went through the quarter. I think as we go into the second quarter, there's an additional significant ramp of the server business. We expect to continue to gain share as we go through these next couple of quarters. I think what we're seeing from the current COVID-19 environment, obviously there's a lot of puts and takes, but as it relates to data center, it's positive for the data center market.
Certainly we've seen some of our largest customers ask us to accelerate some of our deployments, and we look forward to continuing to ramp our server business. I think you asked about Milan, and yes, we are expecting to be launching that at the end of this year.
Got it. Thank you. Just wanted to switch quickly into the PC business. One of the things that stood out to me from your commentary in the prepared script was the contrast between strength in the PC business globally versus the weakness in China. I imagine that weakness in China was both on the PC side and on the AIB graphics business. If there's any way that you could help quantify that, and we've heard some commentary about the economy restarting in China. Have you seen some of those trends start to improve into the second quarter? Thank you.
Sure. The PC business has actually held up pretty well. If we look at the PC business in the first quarter, we saw the rest of the world PC business actually get some benefit from some of the acceleration in demand sort of towards the end of the quarter. We did see some weakness in China as China was shut down in the months of February and early March. We saw that primarily in the channel business, so in offline channels. We have seen that pick up as we've gone through the month of April. What we're seeing in general in the PC business is the first quarter and the second quarter is actually relatively strong with accelerated notebook demand. Desktops sequentially lower just based on sort of the preference around notebook versus desktop in this framework.
Those are the key dynamics for the PC business.
Thank you very much.
Thanks, Matt.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, please ask one question, one follow-up to return to the queue. Our next question is coming from Joe Moore from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live.
Great, thank you. You guys are one of the few companies kind of giving a full year guidance, and I just wonder if you could talk us through how you're thinking about the second half. Obviously, you guys have OEM visibility into a bunch of new sockets and new designs, but your customers don't seem to have visibility. Just a little bit more color maybe on how you are thinking about forecasting beyond the visibility you have in Q2.
Yeah, sure, Joe. We understand that there's a lot of questions about visibility as we go into the second half of the year. The way we look at our business is we have sort of a lot of positives in terms of just market drivers that we do have good visibility to. I think our progress in the data center market is a positive. We see that with the number of platforms ramping and the number of customers that we have coming on board. We see that as a positive for us as we go through this year. Console gaming is a positive for us. There's lots of anticipation around the consoles. It's one of the largest launches, I think, of the year. There's no change in our view as it relates to COVID-19, just given what we see today.
As you look at the range, we have increased the range of our guide, and sort of the biggest sort of question mark in my mind is kind of the shape of the PC market this year. As I mentioned earlier, the first half actually looks a little bit stronger than expected, particularly on the notebook side. We are potentially expecting some weakness in the second half due to consumer spending. You sort of have the two forces are there. I mean, one is, there is a pull with the strong work from home trends, but then there's also the view that from a macro standpoint will be weaker in the second half of the year. That's the primary variance in our model is what happens to the PC market. I will say, though, that underneath the market trends, we're very pleased with our portfolio.
I mean, the notebook portfolio that we have in PCs is the strongest we've ever had. We have a good opportunity to gain share throughout the year, even as the market may be a little bit weaker than originally expected. That's the reason for the guidance, to try to give the puts and takes, and of course, we'll see how the year plays out.
That's helpful. Thank you. In terms of data center GPU, I know you talked a lot about the Analyst Day, about the newer products and penetration of new workloads in the second half. Can you talk about the workloads that you've been addressing so far, cloud gaming and whatnot, and how is that business progressing before we get to the CDNA launch?
Yeah. The data center GPU business is an important strategic business. In terms of size, it's still relatively small compared to the data center CPU business. We are making progress, a good overall progress in a number of workloads. Cloud gaming is one that has been a good one for us. We continue to see opportunity in that as we go through this year with the current product set. We also just launched the VDI instance with Microsoft Azure, which we feel will be a good workload for us. We have a number of the HPC wins that we've talked about that are going to be based on the CDNA architecture, which is an important strategic area for us, as well as continued focus on improving our machine learning and overall machine learning frameworks and capabilities.
Those are the key workloads that we're going after, and I do think it's an important business for us as we go forward.
Thank you.
Okay, the next question is coming from Vivek Arya from Bank of America Securities. Your line is now live.
Thank you for taking my question. Lisa, for my first one, I just wanted to go back to your EPYC server business. Very strong units in Q1, but it appears that the mix was very cloud heavy, perhaps ASPs were lower than we are used to seeing. I was wondering if you could just give us some sense of how we should think about server ASPs going forward. Importantly, if you think of server sales for you for this year versus what you thought 90 days ago, how is that looking like? I think your competitor said that they expected some kind of digestion of cloud capacity in the back half. I was just hoping to get some more color around ASP and just what you thought of your overall server business for this year.
Sure, Vivek. Yes, that is correct. There was a mix shift towards cloud in the first quarter, and that did have an impact with ASPs lower. That being the case, the ASPs are very healthy. I think from the standpoint of how our business evolves, it's within the plus or minus of the business model. In terms of where we believe demand will be versus 90 days ago, it's pretty similar. The way I would say it is we see cloud being strong. What we see is not just putting on more capacity, but really the ramping of new platforms, and so we view that as a positive. We have strong enterprise adoption as well.
When we look at our pipeline in enterprise, it's continued to grow and continued to grow in the first quarter and continued to grow in sort of the first month here of the second quarter. We do expect perhaps that the transactional business or the SMB type of business may be more impacted by COVID-19, but that was never a large piece of our business to begin with. We feel good about the server business, and it continues to be a very strategic focus for us. I think the relationships with our partners and our customers are getting closer as we go through sort of the process of ramping volumes, and so we continue to view it as a strong growth driver for us on a year-over-year basis.
Very helpful. Maybe a follow-up for Devinder on gross margins. First half kind of tracking towards your 45%-ish target for the year, but Q2 is 44%. I recall, I think either Lisa or Devinder, you said that second half will be more semi-custom weighted, but that suggests some more pressure on gross margin. I was just hoping you could walk us through how we should think about gross margins in the back half, given all the puts and takes of mix that you are expecting. Thank you.
Thanks, Vivek. I think the key puts and takes is, as you said, continued ramp for the semi-custom, which has margins, as you observed, lower than corporate average. They are offset by the strength of data center revenue. Semi-custom ramps the back half, and that does impact the gross margin being lower than corporate average. Data center strength, as Lisa just referenced, that we are pleased with the ramp in the data center business. Data center business, the margins are significantly higher than corporate average, and that helps the offset to help us deliver as we guided for 2020, the 45% gross margin for 2020.
Yeah. Maybe, Vivek, I can just add to that.
Sure.
In addition to the data center mix that Devinder mentioned, we also expect to see the console gross margins improve as we go through the year. That's the reason for the full year guide at 45%. Usually what happens is in the Second quarter is our very first quarter of ramp, for the consoles. The margin starts a little bit lower and continues to ramp as we go through the year.
Okay. Thanks very much.
Thank you. Next question today is coming from Mark Lipacis from Jefferies. Your line is now live.
Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. First question on the client side, I guess AMD has historically had a good presence on the consumer side, but it sounds like you're making great progress on the commercial side with the HP and ThinkPad design wins. Can you give us a sense, roughly, like what is the split between consumer and commercial on the notebook side, and how does that play going forward? Does commercial just continue to grow faster than the consumer side? Is there an impact on the gross margin between, if commercial does grow faster? That's the first question. Thanks.
Yes, Mark. Our PC business does tend to be much more consumer weighted. We've made progress in commercial. Commercial has grown nicely, but it's still consumer weighted. We expect to continue to gain commercial share as we go through this year. As that happens, I think there's two things in the PC margins that affect PC gross margins. Heavier weight of commercial is certainly positive for the overall gross margins. I think the other piece is, we should expect that education will be strong, and that tends to be lower in the mix. There are lots of mix dynamics. Overall, I think our confidence level in notebooks being a strong growth driver for us as we go through this year is good, and we continue to work on the commercial versus consumer mix.
Great. That's helpful. Then on the server side, if you look at cloud instances versus cloud internal versus enterprise versus HPC, can you give us a sense of the split today, if not by percentage, then like a rank order and what you would expect to drive going forward? Our own field work had indicated that your instances were growing nicely on EPYC 2. I wonder to what extent is that being deployed internally on the cloud side also. Thank you.
Sure, Mark. When you look at our cloud instances, I would say that some of the cloud acceleration I referred to was acceleration of internal workloads at some of our top cloud customers. Cloud instances in terms of numbers for external usage, has grown. We announced the GCP platform, we announced the IBM platform, as well as additional Microsoft platforms. You will see more cloud instances roll out over the next quarter or so. Much of the growth that we've seen has been around internal deployment of the cloud companies. As it relates to enterprise, it is more heavily weighted towards HPC. We've done very well in HPC. We're pretty excited about our new high frequency SKUs that were just launched here in April.
They're actually very well-suited for large enterprise applications and financial sector, as well as some of the technology sectors. That's a key focus for us in terms of growing those other pieces of the enterprise business.
Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question today is coming from Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein Research. Your line is now live.
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. First, to harp a little bit again on the server business. I guess I don't quite understand why a big shift toward cloud mix would drive ASPs down sequentially. I mean, your mix has been mostly cloud all along, so why all of a sudden is that driving ASPs down? I know you said units were up double digits. I guess in that context, what did revenues do sequentially? Maybe what were data center revenues, CPU plus GPU, as a percentage of total in the quarter? If you could give any color on any of that'd be really helpful.
Sure. We did have a positive cloud mix, but I would say that the Q4 to Q1 mix had significant improvement in cloud or significant growth in cloud. That was the ASP sort of shift that we talked about. As it relates to data center overall, we were in the high 10s this quarter. You had one other question, Stacy?
I said, what did revenues do sequentially?
Oh, yes.
Double digits.
Yeah. Revenues were also up sequentially.
Okay.
Not as much as units, but revenues were sequentially. Yep.
Got it. Thank you. For my follow-up, again, I want to talk a little bit about the share target. I know you'd said 10% share, give or take, by the middle of this year. If I even just take your entire EESC revenue, and I take Intel's data center revenue this quarter, you'd be about 5% revenue share. I know you're guiding for growth next quarter, but I mean, just given the magnitudes, it doesn't feel like that's going to double in a quarter. Just how are you feeling about that 10% guide for the middle of this year? Is that getting pushed out? Are we defining it wrong? Like, how should we be thinking about that?
Yeah. The way we define the share target, we expect about 20 million units a year in terms of single-socket and dual-socket servers. That's about five million units a quarter, so 10% share is about 500,000 units. From where we look today, we look to be on track to that. Q2 is actually our-
By Q2?
Yes. Q2 is actually our strongest backlog quarter that we've seen, so I think that's our current visibility today.
Is that $20 million an appropriate number, though, given you're now playing in comm, whereas maybe when you gave that target before you weren't playing in comm? Isn't the total market's more like $30 million or even more, right?
Well, again, I think, not to go back on how we define the target. I think I've given you how we define the target, and I think that's an appropriate way to define the target. I think our comms exposure is very early, and I would say is not a significant part of the revenue at this point.
Got it. Thank you, guys.
Thank you.
Thank you. Next question is coming from Toshiya Hari from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now live.
Hi. Thank you so much for taking the question. Lisa, I wanted to go back to your full year guide. I appreciate there's a wide range of outcomes here, and you did put up an updated number. If we take the midpoint of your updated guidance and we compare and contrast that with your old guidance, you are lowering the midpoint of your revenue outlook by about $250 million, maybe a little bit more. In response to Joe's question, I think you focused very much on the notebook business. Is that sort of the primary part of your business where you're lowering numbers, or is it a little bit more broad-based across GPU and perhaps the game console business as well?
I would say from the full year standpoint, the biggest variable is the PC business in its entirety. That's notebook and desktop. Like I said, it's a variable. You can model various scenarios as to what it can be. I think from our standpoint, when we started the year, we had the expectation of a pretty normal PC environment. I think we would all say that the environment is different than when we started. Given the size of that market, we have given ourselves a wide range. As it relates to what we thought before, it's primarily PCs. When you look at the other markets, game console, data center, we're about what we expected, and the signals continue to be positive in those areas.
Great. I just have a follow-up.
By the way, I'm sorry. If I can just finish off. On PCs, I would say, though, that I think we're all waiting to see some of the data as we go through the second half of the year. I want to say that, like I said, there's those two competing forces. One is, there's a strong pull for work from home trends. The other is just, what is the impact on macro going to be for discretionary consumer spend? I think that's the place where we lack full visibility. We continue to talk to our customers, and I think we're all trying to make sure that we are well prepared for any of the scenarios as they come about.
Appreciate that. As a quick follow-up, Lisa, I wanted to ask about the competitive landscape. Your nearest competitor continues to grow wafer capacity, as you know, and they talked quite a bit about accelerating the ramp for 10 last week on their call. Are you seeing any changes in how they compete in the marketplace, either from a pricing perspective or from a marketing dollar perspective, relative to how you saw the market 90 days ago? Thank you.
The PC market is always a competitive market and from that standpoint, I don't think the environment has changed substantially from either a capacity standpoint or a marketing dollar standpoint. From our view, it's all about ensuring that the platforms that we launch actually ramp into production smoothly. We've been working on that, and we feel very good about that. I think we mentioned that we have a significant number of platforms, over 135 mobile platforms that are coming to market here in 2020. They're very competitive. They're some of our best platforms from just an overall performance and capability standpoint. We're bullish on our ability to turn that into revenue growth.
Thank you.
Thanks. Our next question today is coming from Ross Seymore from Deutsche Bank. Your line is now live.
Hi. Thanks for letting me ask a question. Lisa, not to go back to the same well as everybody else, but I wanted to hit on the EPYC side of things. I guess the good news is you guys are growing very rapidly and taking share, and you reiterated that 10% market share goal for the June quarter. Overall, it seems like the number has not really upsided anybody's expectations over the last few quarters, despite the market accelerating from a demand perspective, your primary competitor upsiding their data center group or even their cloud segment within that for three to four quarters in a row. I just wanted to get your feeling on, is there something that is capping the growth there? Is it the ASPs going down because of who the customers are?
I'm just wondering why if the market is as strong as it has seemed to be for the last three or four quarters, you're doing really well, but not actually upsiding our expectations.
Yeah, Ross, the way I look at it. This was very similar to the ramp that we saw in the PC business. The ramp in server is something like steady as she goes. Each quarter we add platforms, each quarter more platforms are qualified, each quarter they ramp. It's a little bit different from a pure market phenomena. Again, I understand that there are market phenomena and then there are growth expectations based on platform launches, as well as software being qualified and so on and so forth. As it relates to our expectations, it's actually going quite well. As it relates to the acceleration of cloud, I think we're pleased with it. We're not ready to upside numbers at this point. I think we already had very aggressive growth assumptions in what we went through.
I think you'll see us a little bit less market specific and a little bit more AMD specific as it relates to our customers and their qualification plans. I think we are confident that our data center business is doing well, and we need to continue to demonstrate that over a number of quarters.
Thanks for that answer. Just for my follow-up, wanted to switch gears over to the computing and graphics side. Could you just give a little bit of color on what you expect for that in the second quarter? As you look into the second half, I know you mentioned that's the area of greatest uncertainty for many logical reasons, but any sort of difference between the computing and the graphics side, both in your second quarter expectations and then the puts and takes in the back half of the year?
Yeah. We are expecting that the computing and graphics business will be down sequentially. It's offsetting some of the growth on the EPYC and semi-custom side. Within the computing and graphics business, we see notebooks up strongly as a result of the launch of our new Ryzen 4000 platforms and some of the other trends that we've talked about. We see desktop down sequentially, and we see graphics down sequentially. Q2 is normally a sequentially down quarter for the channel business for us, so that's not unusual. Those are the dynamics in the second quarter. As we go through the second half of the year, as I mentioned, we'll have to see how consumer spending holds up against the other demand environments.
Thank you.
Thank you. Next question today is coming from John Pitzer from Credit Suisse. Your line is now live.
Yeah, good afternoon, guys. Thanks for letting me ask the question. Lisa, just my first question, I wonder if you could just help me kind of better understand in this current environment of shelter in place, how does that impact sort of new customer, new workload engagement? I guess to better kind of underscore that, just given that you're expecting pretty good share gains in the back half of the year, given your second half guidance, notwithstanding the gaming cycle, are most of those wins already in your back pocket and so you've got high visibility? Or how do I think about that dynamic?
I think there are many that are already in progress, and that would be our sort of typical view of how long it takes to ramp a customer from beginning of engagement to actual ramp. Can it be anywhere from six to nine months, if that's a good number. As it relates to what we see with the, as you call it, shelter in place. Look, we see pretty strong activity. I mean, the activity level continues to be high on both the cloud, as well as the enterprise side. The only place where perhaps we see a little bit of a slowdown is, as I said, on some of the transactional business, which we had planned to grow as we go through this year, and that might grow more slowly, just as people aren't focused on new infrastructure right now.
In terms of cloud and large enterprise, there continues to be good activity on both current already won design platforms as well as new pipeline engagements.
That's helpful, Lisa. As my follow-up, as you guys are painfully aware, one of the metrics that we probably focus too much on is just gross margin and gross margin progression. Given the gaming sort of ramp coming, it sort of convolutes the issue. I was kind of hoping maybe you would quantify, both in your Q2 guide and your full year guide, what impact the gaming console business is having on gross margins, i.e., what would gross margins be trending to right now, ex gaming for both June and the full year?
I'm thinking, John. Go ahead, Devinder.
If you look at Q2, if you're asking the specific Q1 to Q2 we came in at the 46%, Q2 is down, and fundamentally, primarily is due to the ramp in the game console revenue. As Lisa said earlier, mentioned that the margins in the initial ramp of semi-custom revenue are typically lower, and they do improve over time for semi-custom. Also from a company standpoint, when you look at the corporate average gross margin is lower, and therefore, it is having an impact in terms of sequentially how the margin is going down from Q1 to Q2.
I guess, Devinder, my question is the non-gaming gross margins continuing to move higher sequentially every quarter this year, i.e., is it more than 100 basis point impact from gaming in the June quarter?
I think-
Go ahead. Go ahead, Lisa.
Sorry. Devinder and I are not in the same room. The answer is yes, John. The impact of the sequential decline of two points is Semi-Custom. If you take Semi-Custom out, the rest of the portfolio what you would see in the rest of the portfolio is you would see server up. You would see desktop offset some of that. The sequential decline is all Semi-Custom.
Perfect. Thanks, guys.
Thank you. Next question is coming from Timothy Arcuri from UBS. Your line is now live.
Hi. I had two. I guess the first question, Devinder, I think you said that data center was high teens of revenue, so that would put it sort of in the low to mid threes for March. Can you break out how much was CPU versus GPU? I guess on the GPU side, that can be pretty lumpy. Anything to call out that's assumed for June?
It's weighted towards the CPUs. If you take the data center CPUs and GPUs together, the revenue in Q1 is high 10s of revenue in Q1, but primarily weighted towards the CPUs, because that's the area of growth from a server CPU business standpoint.
Okay. I guess, bigger picture question. Lisa, I think there's some new regulations in China that go into effect on June 1st around additional cybersecurity review for critical information infrastructure. I would think that maybe you could fall under that, so any thought on how that could impact demand for you and maybe if you could sort of tell us how much of your revenue on a consumption basis you think right now is in China? Thanks.
Yeah. We're looking at that new regulation. I don't have any specifics at this point in time. We'll continue to look at that new regulation. As it relates overall, I would say the majority of our business in China is consumer or let's call it consumer-related cloud.
Thanks a lot, Lisa.
Thank you.
Operator. We'll take two more questions please.
Certainly. Our next question is coming from Mitch Steves from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now live.
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I've got one and a follow-up. The first one just on the bookings you guys are seeing. I'm less worried about the near-term revenue number you guys put up for server, but if you're sitting here today and you compare that to a quarter ago, what do the bookings look like or backlog? Has that changed at all? Is that improving? Is it getting better, or is it pretty much in line with what you guys expected in terms of the overall backlog?
Yeah, I think I said earlier, Mitch, it is certainly better. We have better visibility a month into the quarter versus 90 days ago.
Okay. The second one I had is just more broad. It's on China, actually. One thing we're picking up is that a lot of the Chinese companies are supposedly buying a lot of semiconductor chips ahead just in case they get banned from the U.S. and China relationship deterioration. Since you guys are not really involved in that, and you're more exposed to the hyperscale, do you guys have any comments on what you guys think is actually happening there? If people are actually trying to build up an inventory level for semiconductor chips that they may get banned, or do you think that's just noise and it's not really occurring right now in that geography?
Yeah. Mitch, it's a little bit hard for me to generalize. I would say from what we see, and we track both sell-in and consumption pretty closely, it looks like it's normal patterns, but we don't have exposure to some of the markets you're talking about.
Got it. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question is coming from Blayne Curtis from Barclays. Your line is now live.
Hey, thanks for squeezing me in. Maybe Lisa, just looking at the fiscal guide, I'm curious if you look at first half versus second half, it seems like you still would require growth in compute and graphics. Wanted to just make sure that was right. I'm just curious how you think of the server. Obviously, your share gainer. I think cloud and enterprise get intermingled together, particularly with this work from home. I'm just curious, as you look at that business first half and second half, I think Intel was talking about some weakness in enterprise and government. It's not a big exposure for you, but just curious how you're thinking about, is there any headwind as that work from home spend rolls off of server as well?
As it relates to first half, second half, as we said, there's the $8.4 billion ±5% is a wider than normal range for us. I think you can see outcomes within that range that would have computing and graphics up, as well as you can see outcomes with it more flattish. That being the case though, I think the trends that I talked about are likely the right trends, which is the consumer spending perhaps a little softer, enterprise and commercial, a positive for us, notebook share gain, a positive for us, and we want to see how the desktop channel behaves as we go into the second half of the year. Then your second question?
Just as you look at the server business first half, second half, you saw some strength in cloud in March and June. I'm curious, are you thinking about, is there any work from home benefits within that would then turn into a headwind in the second half?
Yeah. Look, I think from what we see, we see mostly platforms ramping, that's how we're thinking about the data center business. Of course, we're in this COVID-19 environment, we'll have to actually play out the next couple of quarters. Within the ranges that we see, we see an opportunity to continue growing in the second half of the year, given the visibility that we have with customers, the platforms that are ramping. I still feel very much like we're in the early stages of our 2nd Gen EPYC ramp. I know it's been a couple quarters, but that's just the way servers' ramp. We're in the early stages of the ramp.
Lots of customer activity, significant pull from the customers to get up and running as soon as possible. As you said, we don't have as much exposure to some of the other end markets, which may have more volatility in the second half of the year.
Thanks.
Thank you. We've reached the end of our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over for any further closing comments.
Thank you, Kevin. That concludes today's call. We appreciate everybody participating, and stay safe, stay well, and we'll look forward to engaging with you throughout the quarter. Thank you.
Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.