Greetings. Welcome to ASGN Incorporated's Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note this conference is being recorded. At this time, I'll turn the conference over to Kimberly Esterkin with Investor Relations. Kimberly, you may now begin.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today for ASGN's third quarter 2021 conference call. With me are Ted Hanson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Rand Blazer, President of Apex Systems, George Wilson, President of ECS, and Ed Pierce, Chief Financial Officer. Before we get started, I would like to remind everyone that our commentary contains forward-looking statements. Although we believe these statements are reasonable, they are subject to risks and uncertainties, and as such, our actual results could differ materially from those statements. Certain of these risks and uncertainties are described in today's press release and in our SEC filings. We do not assume any obligation to update statements made on this call. For your convenience, our prepared remarks and supplemental materials can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at investors.asgn.com.
Please also note that on this call we will be referencing certain non-GAAP measures such as Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, and free cash flow. These non-GAAP measures are intended to supplement the comparable GAAP measure. Reconciliations between the GAAP and non-GAAP measures are included in today's press release. I will now turn the call over to Ted Hanson, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Thank you, Kimberly, and thank you for joining ASGN's third quarter 2021 earnings call. ASGN reported very strong results for the third quarter, and I want to thank our entire team for their incredible effort which contributed to such strong performance. I'm pleased to report that we came in above the high end of our revenue and Adjusted EBITDA guidance ranges for Q3, which we raised from our initial guidance during our Investor and Analyst Day conference last month, indicating a continued acceleration of our business. Importantly, all of our businesses, with the exception of CyberCoders, achieved record revenues for the quarter, with CyberCoders revenues increasing to levels above the third quarter of 2019. Given these strong results, we will be raising our guidance estimates for Q4 2021. Ed Pierce, our CFO, will discuss our updated guidance shortly.
Revenues for the third quarter totaled approximately $1.1 billion, up 18.7% year-over-year. Excluding acquisition contributions, revenues improved 14.1% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA of $136.6 million improved 34.1% from the prior year period. ASGN has significant capital resources to support investments in our organic growth, M&A, and share repurchases. In the third quarter, acquisitions contributed $47.2 million in revenue. We continue to believe that M&A generates the highest return of capital for all of our stakeholders. Our M&A pipeline remains robust, and we recently added a Senior Vice President of Corporate Development to our team to support our company-wide acquisition efforts.
Year- to- date, we also spent $118.4 million in the repurchase of shares and have $131.6 million remaining under our $250 million share repurchase plan. With that said, let's turn to more detail on our segment performance for the quarter, beginning with our largest segment, Commercial, which serves large enterprise and Fortune 1000 companies across multiple end markets. For the third quarter of 2021, the Commercial segment generated revenue of $774.9 million, up 25.8% year-over-year, and up 24.1% organically. Apex Systems continued to report very strong growth, and for the first time, Creative Circle and CyberCoders surpassed 2019 quarterly revenues. Each of these operating units also reported their fifth quarter of sequential growth.
From an industry perspective, all five commercial industry verticals for Apex Systems, our commercial IT services and Solutions Division, experienced growth during the quarter with every vertical except the financial services industry accounts achieving double-digit growth on a year-over-year basis. Apex Systems commercial and industrial accounts were up double digits both year-over-year and sequentially due to the continued strength across all sectors, with particularly high growth in energy, utilities, airlines, and air freight. Its technology and telecommunications or TMT vertical was up double digits year-over-year. Within the vertical, technology accounts saw significant growth over Q3 2020, while telecommunications accounts were up high single digits year-over-year. Government and business services was up double digits, with aerospace and defense and government accounts up mid-single digits for the third quarter, while business service accounts grew double digits year-over-year.
Financial services accounts were up mid-single digits, with growth in regional banks, wealth management, and fintech accounts. Revenues in applications and project management, including agile, digital, ERP, and cloud, continued to perform well. Apex Systems top accounts and retail and branch accounts achieved double-digit growth rates for Q3. From an industry perspective for the quarter, top account revenue at Apex Systems was up in all five industry verticals we target, while Creative Circle also posted positive growth across their top accounts. Gross margin for the commercial segment was 32.4%, up 150 basis points from Q3 of last year due to growth across our high-margin commercial consulting, creative marketing, and permanent placement businesses. EBITDA margins were also up due to the associated growth in gross margins along with higher productivity in our workforce. We also continued to expand our commercial consulting revenues during the quarter.
Commercial consulting revenues totaled $187.6 million, a significant increase of 94.2% year-over-year, virtually all of which was organic growth. Our pipelines of booked revenue and future opportunities each continue to grow at high double-digit rates and are trending positively in the fourth quarter. Consulting offerings in our commercial segment remain an important source of the value we provide our clients, and so we continue to identify acquisition opportunities that expand our capabilities in areas in high demand, such as cloud, data analytics and AI, agile development, digital transformation, and enterprise application implementation. In the consulting space, we are seeing an increasing amount of work in digital innovation and modern enterprise solutions that enable us to implement many of the elements of our clients' individual digital roadmaps.
Work in Agile and DevOps, in particular, is a large component of the support we provide as our clients tie together applications in their cloud environment and strengthen their customer support with real-time data updates. For example, our ability to build dashboards and software interfaces to propel the customer experience and internal management of business operations have been key drivers of our revenues of late. Now let's turn to our federal government segment, which provides mission-critical solutions to the Department of Defense, intelligence agencies, and other civilian agencies. Revenues for the federal government segment totaled $298.9 million for the third quarter, up 3.6% year-over-year. EBITDA margin also improved during the quarter to total 11.4%, up 230 basis points from the third quarter of 2020.
The federal government segment's new business pipeline remains strong, with $430.2 million in new business awarded during the third quarter and a book-to-bill ratio of 1.44 to 1. Contract backlog totaled $3.1 billion at the end of the third quarter, or a healthy coverage ratio of 2.6x the segment's trailing 12-month revenues. In Q3, examples of some of the contracts awarded to our federal government segment included a legacy data consolidation solution contract with the Naval Information Warfare Center to support its work for the Defense Health Agency, including achieving new efficiencies and cost savings. Three task orders to support the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration with the development of decision support tools such as economic impact models.
A five-year prime contract with the U.S. Central Command to provide personnel, supervision, and services necessary to support critical missions and operations. A five-year multiple award prime contract with the General Services Administration to aid the development of manned and unmanned systems for the Department of Defense. With that, I will now turn the call over to Ed Pierce, our CFO, to discuss the third quarter financial results and our fourth-quarter guidance. Ed?
Thanks, Ted. Good afternoon, everyone. As Ted mentioned, our financial performance for the third quarter exceeded our updated guidance estimates that we announced during our Investor and Analyst Day conference last month. This performance was driven by year-over-year double-digit organic revenue growth, the contribution from businesses acquired after Q3 of last year, and expansion in the gross and Adjusted EBITDA margins in both business segments. For the quarter, revenues were $1.074 billion, up 18.7% over Q3 of last year, and up 10.1% sequentially. The revenue contribution from acquisitions made after Q3 of last year was $42 million or 4.6 percentage points of the year-over-year growth rate for the quarter. Net income and Adjusted EBITDA were both up year- over- year and sequentially, and grew at a higher rate than revenues.
Our adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.7% was 140 basis points higher than Q3 of last year, reflecting, among other things, improvement in the business mix and expansion in the gross margins of our two business segments. Revenues from our commercial segment were $774.9 million, up 25.8% year-over-year. For the fifth straight quarter, all commercial divisions were up both year-over-year and sequentially. Acquisitions made after Q3 of last year contributed $10.4 million in revenues for the quarter, or 1.7 percentage points of the year-over-year growth rate. Revenues from our federal government segment were $298.9 million, up 3.6% year-over-year and in line with our guidance estimate.
This growth was driven by a number of factors, including the effects of new contract awards and the revenue contributions from businesses acquired after Q3 2020, $31.6 million. As you may recall from prior calls, revenues in Q3 of last year benefited from a high level of spending under two AI/ML cost reimbursable contracts. Normalizing for the revenue surge in Q3 last year and excluding the contribution from acquisitions, revenue growth for the quarter was low single digits year-over-year. Gross margin of 28.7% exceeded the high end of our updated guidance estimates and was up 260 basis points year-over-year. Both business segments reported year-over-year expansion in gross margin. Gross margin for the commercial segment was 32.4%, up 150 basis points year-over-year.
The expansion was a result of the double-digit growth of our high-margin commercial consulting, creative marketing, and permanent placement services. Gross margin for the federal government segment was up 340 basis points, mainly as a result of changes in business mix, which included a lower level of revenues from certain cost reimbursable contracts, the contribution from high-margin businesses acquired after Q3 of last year, and higher profitability on two firm fixed price contracts whose initial contract term ended during the quarter. SG&A expenses were $192.7 million and were above our updated guidance estimate because of acquisition-related expenses, which we do not include in our guidance estimates.
The year-over-year increase in SG&A expenses was commensurate with the growth in the business, the higher mix of high-margin commercial revenues, which carry a higher SG&A expense component than federal government services, higher headcount investments to support future growth in the business, and higher incentive compensation than healthcare expenses, which were both down in 2020 from historical levels. Income from continuing operations was $66.3 million, up 42% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA was up 34.1% year-over-year on revenue growth of 18.7%. Our Adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.7% was up 140 basis points from Q3 of last year related to the expansion in gross margin. At quarter end, cash and cash equivalents were $679.4 million.
There were no outstanding borrowings under our $250 million revolving credit facility, and our senior secured debt leverage ratio was 1.08 to 1. As noted in today's release, we are updating our guidance estimates for the fourth quarter from the estimates we announced during our Investor and Analyst Day conference last month. Relative to our earlier guidance, we are increasing our revenue estimates by $20 million and our Adjusted EBITDA estimate by $5 million. Our updated estimates for the fourth quarter are set forth in our earnings release and supplemental materials. For the fourth quarter of 2021, we estimate revenues of $1.01 billion-$1.03 billion, income from continuing operations of $52.5 million-$56.2 million, and Adjusted EBITDA of $116.5 million-$121.5 million.
We are estimating all divisions will be up year-over-year. At the midpoint of our financial estimates, year-over-year revenue growth for the fourth quarter is approximately 13.3%. On a sequential basis, we expect revenues will be down as the fourth quarter has fewer billable days than the third quarter. However, for the commercial segment, we expect revenues per billable day will be up sequentially. For our federal government segment, we expect revenues per billable day will be down because of lower expected revenues from certain cost reimbursable contracts and our decision not to renew two low-margin web services contracts that expired at the end of the third quarter. Thank you for your time, and I'll turn the call back over to Ted for some closing remarks. Ted?
Thanks, Ed. ASGN's success continues to be driven by an incredible team effort across our company. Before we open up the call to your questions, I'd like to speak about one of our team members, in particular, our President of ECS, George Wilson. George, as many of you know, has spearheaded our government business since ASGN acquired ECS in 2018. ECS, now referred to as our federal government segment, has had a long history of delivering excellent financial results. George and his leadership team have expertly navigated the federal government marketplace to meet the most critical and complex needs of our clients to reach $1 billion in revenues well ahead of our initial expectations. After much planning and internal discussion, George has decided to retire at the end of this calendar year.
While George's official role as President of ECS will come to an end at the close of this year, he will remain in consulting role with ASGN through April 2022. In George's place, John Heneghan, ECS's current Chief Operating Officer, will assume the role of President. George and John have worked closely together for over two decades, and John has been preparing for this new role as part of our planned succession process over the past two years. John has more than 20 years of experience in emerging technology and digital transformation, IT product development, managed services, business strategy, and corporate development. I anticipate that this transition into this new role will be seamless.
On behalf of our board of directors and the entire ASGN team, I want to personally thank George for his incredible service to ECS and ASGN. I'd also like to congratulate John on his promotion. John will join us for today's Q&A session. Thank you again for your time this afternoon and for your continued support of ASGN. This concludes our prepared remarks for the third quarter. We will now open up the call to your questions.
Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question today, please press star one on your telephone keypad, and a confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants that are using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment please, while we poll for questions. Once again, that's star one. Thank you. Our first question will be coming from the line of Gary Bisbee with Bank of America. Please proceed with your questions.
Hey, guys. Good afternoon. I guess I wanted to ask a question about the commercial segment gross margins. You know, obviously up quite strongly year-over-year and also ahead of the pre-pandemic third quarter 2019. When I think back a few years ago, you know, you tend to talk a lot about stable margins as the right expectation. Clearly, with the mix shift going on in the business, you know, this seems to be a good case for margin expansion. I guess, you know, and you talked about to a certain extent at the Investor Day, but as you think about, you know, beyond these easy comps you've had for the next few quarters and looking forward, how should we think about the case for margin expansion on the gross margin line in summary?
Well, Gary, look, I'll let Rand hop in here and talk about this, but there's some proof points, if you will, underneath the strategy here that we see that are working. One is where, you know, in the commercial segment, as we've talked about a lot, moving up into higher margin work. We're also seeing that we're on the backs of that getting expansion and pay-to-bill margins. You know, all these kind of underlie the strategy of where we are. I mean, obviously, there can be headwinds in certain skill sets, certain large accounts. But I think the progress that we're making here is incrementally adding to gross margin here, as we go forward.
We've set the guidance, you know, for you on a forward basis, that they could be stable based on, one, being a larger firm, but then, two, offsetting that with moving into higher margin work streams here. You know, I'd kind of refer you back to the Analyst Day materials for anything on a forward basis. Rand, anything you'd add to that? Rand, you're on mute.
I'm sorry. Yes, I wouldn't add anything to it. I think the tailwinds you've commented on are great. I think we obviously, the resurgence of Creative Circle and CyberCoders within our commercial unit is helping. The consulting business is helping. By the way, our staffing gross margins have always been best in class, so, you know, I think steady is certainly what we the least that we would expect, right?
Okay. Just a follow-up I'd ask on the commercial consulting business. You know, I know you've had relatively easier comps, but the growth has been terrific. If we were to think about the number of acquisitions you've done in the last couple of years that added capabilities and how important those have been to the organic growth you've been delivering versus, you know, penetrating clients more with these services or any other sort of relevant driver, how important has the M&A been in continuing to add those capabilities versus just your views of how you're penetrating the market? Thank you.
Well, it's been very important. Rand, I'll let you talk to that.
Yeah, I think, look, there's, you know, we have an excellent reputation with the clients. We've always said that our past experience as a staffing firm is critical. The account relationships we've built over the last decade have put us in good stead with the client and make us present in the discussion about future needs. The muscle that we've added through the acquisitions has been unbelievable. It's really propelled us in areas like cloud, agile development, you know, overall integration and ERP implementation. So they have all contributed. It's a combination of the things. So it's I think they've been instrumental, Gary, to our strength in consulting. If you look at the numbers in consulting, by the way, I mean, it really has jumped up, right, since even 2019, 2020.
If you look back on all the revenue numbers, you know, we've more than doubled these numbers in this year. Right time, right place. Fortunately for us, we had the right set of technical strength to step up.
Thank you. Terrific performance.
Our next question comes from the line of Tim Mulrooney with William Blair. Please proceed with your questions.
Hey, this is Sam filling in for Tim. Thanks for taking our questions here. You know, we've seen strong growth, both organic and total growth, coming out of the ECS and the broader federal business for several years now. I'm not asking for guidance on fiscal 2022 specifically, but just more broadly speaking, I'm curious, under a more normalized environment, how you think about the organic growth rate potential for this business based on the portfolio as it stands today.
Sam, if you go back to 2018, the acquisition date, and still kind of holds true today, I mean, we've kind of guided you to mid- to high-single-digit percentage for organic growth rates for ECS. They fortunately have gotten much higher growth rates than that, you know, here in the past. Very difficult comps are kind of catching up with us, but I think for your, you know, modeling purposes, I would look to mid- to high-single-digit percent. I think, you know, again, I'd refer you back to Ed Pierce's numbers for our three-year targets in the Investor and Analyst Day presentation.
Perfect. Appreciate it. Switching gears a little bit here. You know, our team read an article from SIA the other day that shared how cybersecurity accounted for more than 20% of all IT job postings this year. You know, I'm curious if this is what you've been seeing on your side of things. In particular, if cybersecurity has had a larger impact on your growth this year than in previous years. If so, is that trend something you might expect to carry forward over the next few years here?
Yes. I'll let Rand answer the commercial side of this and John comment on federal.
I would say on the commercial side, Sam, cybersecurity, we look at it as it's embedded in every solution we provide. So you always have to consider the security aspects of whatever you're doing in the technology area. If you looked at our actual, what we call counted revenue toward the cybersecurity skill area or solution area, it has increased, definitely, but it's not our fastest growing or largest solution area. But I go back and say again, cybersecurity, we view it as an important element in everything we do. So you can be working with the cloud, you can work with the ERP, you can be working with, you know, code development, dashboards. You have got to consider cybersecurity or security in all of that. So it's embedded in everywhere. George?
Hey, Rand. This is John.
I think we're gonna let John on.
Yeah, John here. Sam, listen, cybersecurity makes up about 20% of the ECS segment's business. Like Rand said, you know, cybersecurity really is in and around everything that we do. It's a big part of our DevSecOps model. You know, cybersecurity also is an area where we are highly invested and is a big part of our future growth. We're kind of leading the space in Zero Trust and in cyber analytics and managed cybersecurity offerings. It's a place that we're highly invested. We have great depth of capability, and look for that as a continued market priority for our federal customers. We are, you know, prepared for that and excited about where cybersecurity is going for business.
Appreciate it, guys.
Our next question is from the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Thanks. I had a question on, well, wage inflation, certainly a broad topic out there today. Does both internally and externally in your business a higher rate of wage inflation over the next several years make it easier or harder for you to hit your multi-year goals? Could you explain how it might impact the attainment of those goals? Thanks.
Yeah. Well, good question, Tobey. I mean, look, we've always lived in wage inflation in technology skill sets in our business, where in typical years, maybe it's a couple, three points, you know, and we kind of plan on that both in the current period and forecasting pricing for the future periods. Today, it's maybe more in the mid-single digits. I don't think that necessarily hinders or helps, if you will. I guess you could make an argument for we're doing a good job today passing that through to higher bill rates with our customers. They understand it. They want the best talent, so they're making the appropriate accommodations in order for that to happen. Maybe if bill rates are a little higher, then it's a little easier to get to our targets.
I think that those are kind of, you know, just incremental crumbs kind of around the edges. I mean, I think the story is here that there's wage inflation for sure. We always experience it. We have been adept at, you know, passing that to the customer, because they have the desire to get the best talent, and you can see that in the, you know, the performance of our gross margin profile. You know, we've got some incremental expansion here.
Thanks. Shifting gears to the ECS and the federal government segment, do you see a good pipeline of awards pending adjudication and that kind of thing, even as we stare at a continuing resolution and haven't really had a lot of what seems like tangible progress on the multiple appropriations bills that are floating around Congress right now?
Right. We've had a good quarter for bookings this quarter here in the third. John, you wanna talk to Tobey about, you know, future bookings, what the, you know, kind of just what's in the pipeline and how our customer is interacting with us.
Sure. Yeah. Tobey, you know, we do have a very strong and healthy pipeline. As we articulated earlier with you in the Investor Day presentation last month, we have seen a delay in RFP releases over the first half of the year. We've seen that accelerate and are expecting Q4 a lot of RFPs to release. Then as you know, in this space, you know, you wait for those RFPs to be awarded, and there's potential protests and all of that. We, you know, do see that acceleration. It's finally picked up post-COVID and compounded by the presidential transition. Excited about 2022 and beyond. The pipeline's strong.
Thank you. If I could just kind of apply my first question that Ted answered to the ECS business and you, John. Is there anything about your contracts mix, cost-plus T and M fixed-price in which there's a sort of a distinct negative or positive implication from higher wage escalation over the next several years?
No, I think you know, Ted answered that appropriately. We've seen that our customers understand the market, and they want the talent we bring to bear, and we've been able to find ways to increase the wages. I mean, increase the bill rates as appropriate to match the labor. As you know, you know, a third of our business is cost reimbursable, and that makes that a little bit easier. Some of our, you know, most high value type of work is in that cost reimbursable space.
Thank you very much.
Our next question is from the line of Jeff Silber with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions.
Thanks so much. I was wondering if we can focus on the assignment business within your commercial segment. I'm just curious how fill rates are running, compared to what they normally run because of all the supply constraint issues. Do you think that's holding back some of the business there?
Rand?
Well, let me understand the question, Jeff. Are the bill rates holding us back on what we can deliver?
The fill rate for your-
Oh, fill rates.
Sorry about that.
No, I'm sorry. No, I don't think that's holding us back. Our fill ratios have gone up this past year quite significantly. More importantly, the quality of the requisitions or the requirements we're getting are what we call higher quality reqs. What we find a lot of our bigger clients in the Fortune 500 clients is they're working with a fewer number of vendors, and they expect us to step up and to deliver. Our clients are very concerned about building their own workforces, and so this is not a time to dilly-dally, if you will. They're anxious to work with the best and get the best results. Our fill ratios have moved up very nicely, and it's part of our success this year.
Okay. That's great to hear. Just a question about the near term guidance. You know, I know at your Investor and Analyst Day last month, you positively pre-announced, and yet you beat those expectations a few weeks later. Did I hear you say that the changes have actually accelerated since that point in time?
Well, Jeff, I don't know if they've accelerated more than the pace that they were on, but it accelerated through the end of the quarter. So I would just say the pace continues is probably the best way to put it, and-
I'm sorry, just any meaningful business that was different in terms of that, you know, acceleration?
No. Co- uh, just- Just steady acceleration across the board, you know?
Okay, great. That's great to hear. All right. Thanks so much.
Our next question is coming from the line of Surinder Thind with Jefferies. Please proceed with your questions.
Hello, this is Ben Verhajm dialing for Surinder. Thank you for taking my question, and congratulations on the quarter. In terms of just a few housekeeping items, given M&A has become a bigger part of your strategy, we just wanna have a better understanding on how much inorganic revenue is embedded in the full-year guide. Thanks.
Ed Pierce, you wanna take that?
Yeah. As it relates to the contribution from acquisitions, this past quarter, it was $42 million. It would be acquisitions that we made after Q3 of last year, and we're estimating it's gonna be roughly $42 million in Q4. In our earnings release and in our supplemental, you can see us set out separately what the organic growth rate is, not only for the consolidated enterprise, but also by segment. It's in the information that we presented.
Got it. Thank you. Just switching gears a little bit. In terms of client demand trends, in terms of how many positions are being filled in a remote capacity now versus pre-pandemic, is there any sort of meaningful changes versus the height of the pandemic when almost all the jobs were remote?
You've seen an incremental return to on-site work. I wouldn't say it's been a half or more than half by any means. Certain clients in certain industries where it's more important to be on site, you've seen some return to work there. You know, more than half of our resources continue to work on a remote basis.
Got it. Thank you.
Next question comes from the line of Kevin McVeigh with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your questions.
Great. Thanks again. Nice quarter. Hey, you talked about, Ted, you know, M&A and the highest return of capital, and it sounds like you hired a relatively senior person. Any thoughts around that? And is that purely addition or, you know, obviously maybe CyberCoders, areas like that starting to scale. Do you still look to refine a little bit, or would it primarily be targeted M&A?
Yeah, it's really targeted M&A, Kevin. You know, the addition of some, you know, bringing more muscle to the table, if you will, to help us prosecute M&A here is important in my
View over the next three years, given the amount of capital that we have the opportunity to deploy there and the number of targets and the size of targets that are out there in that opportunity set. I think that this is, while we're historically very capable of executing M&A, you know, this is the time to invest there. You know, I would say the pipeline to it right now, we're in a mode of building pipeline, and the pipeline is becoming more robust, and there are target-rich opportunities out here in both the commercial and the federal segments. We have to continue to plod through that to find the right technical capabilities with the right domain expertise, so that fits with what our current view is that we wanna add into the business.
Just, not only obviously you can do it inorganically, but as you think about sourcing candidates in the current environment, Ted, how do you think about today versus, you know, is it tougher today versus, you know, in the-
Did we lose Kevin?
Yes, sir. It appears we've lost Kevin's line. I'm moving on to our next question. It's for the line of Mark-
Hey, operator, hang on one second. I think.
Oh, sure, sir.
I think we can kind of keep together.
No, nope. I'm still here.
Rand. Kevin. Oh, good. Okay.
Yep. Yeah.
Rand, do you wanna take that? Kevin was asking about difficulty to source candidates today versus past, I believe. Right, Kevin?
Yep. Sorry about that, Ted. My phone.
Yeah, no problem.
Well, I guess you expect me, Kevin, to say it's more difficult today, but I'm not gonna say that. It's always been difficult. We have a large database of candidates that we, you know, are indigenous to us. We have an alumni network that's very strong. We have obviously churn in the candidates coming off jobs and going on jobs, that sort of thing. I think it's the automation of all that that we have that makes it a little easier to get to the right candidate and to respond to the clients. If you look at our fill ratios and our growth and everything else, you know, there's nothing that points to we're having more difficulty.
I think sometimes we've said in the past, you know, when you want a certain person with Java skills in New Jersey, and you only wanna pay $50 an hour for them, that's a difficult fill, okay? So there are something, things like that jump into it. But today, with remote work, with using, you know, labor across the country or even near shore, we found that, you know, we have more avenues now to address the needs. So it's, you know, it's no more or no less difficult than it was before.
No, that makes sense.
Kevin, just to emphasize that last point. With clients more open now to bring on remote workers, they've opened their aperture here quite a bit across the country, and nobody is better positioned here than we are as one of the largest providers of IT resources to identify that across the country, find the right skill set, find a more precise match on experiences and industry expertise, and bring that to bear. You know, while there is an imbalance here, demand and supply, there's also kind of a new view here around remote work, and then, you know, obviously we're the best positioned here to bring that to bear for our clients.
That makes sense. Ted, just one quick one, if I could, one follow-up. Has there been any, on the government side, any kinda subcontract awards like with the JEDI contract, or is that still too early for that?
John, you wanna take that one?
You know, we've had several subcontract awards, not so much JEDI, but DEOS is the one where we've seen that as well as a few others. That's a part of our business that remains healthy. Hope that answers your question, Kevin.
Yep, that helps. Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Mark Marcon with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed with your questions.
Good afternoon, everybody, and congratulations on a terrific quarter. This is a question for Rand or Ted. Can you talk a little bit about, you know, the consulting business on the commercial side and your ability to continue to transition, you know, some of the Apex Systems clients over to consulting assignments? I'm just wondering what percentage, you know, of your top enterprise clients are typically using you for consulting services. How has the nature of those consulting assignments changed or evolved over the last, you know, few quarters as you think about just the size of them, the number of consultants on assignment, the length of the projects, et cetera?
Rand?
Yeah. That's a good question, Mark. I'm pleased to answer it. First of all, we do about a third of our enterprise clients are also consulting clients, if you will. You know, with that, has propelled our growth with, but also shows we have a lot of room to go. If you look at the three major groupings of solutions we have and offerings we have to the client, workforce mobilization, modern enterprise, and digital transformation all three are growing. All solutions in all three areas have grown over this past year, quarter- to- quarter. Digital transformation solution and sales have been highest, okay? They've grown the most.
Workforce mobilization actually declined a bit and now is starting to come back, and that's around companies who are recognizing the need to build a workforce strategy. You know, they're concerned about the shortage of labor, and they are starting to think differently about how they build their workforces for now and for the future with some staying power around that. We're benefiting from that. In modern enterprise, a lot of that is ERP work, for example. Our new acquisition of Avaap gives us a strong position there with a package we think is up and coming and doing very well in the marketplace in the healthcare and manufacturing sector called Infor. I mean, I think there are things that we're doing that are helping us propel growth, but digital transformation definitely has been the biggest grower.
That's great. Rand, I appreciate that you all have, you know, lots of consulting experience. If you think about just, you know, the types of assignments that you're winning relative to, you know, the other bidders that are out there, can you just talk about like who you're going head to head against and like, you know, some of the wins that you're kind of the most proud of that exemplify the progress that the overall consulting practice is making?
Ted, I'll go ahead.
Yeah, go ahead, please.
Mark. Yeah, Mark, I'd say first of all, the good news is now, as we've been at this for a number of years, is we're starting to get multi-year contracts and awards as well as seven-figure or higher awards per year. We've migrated up to bigger jobs and longer-term jobs and jobs that go over a period of years. Who are we competing with? It varies. There are a couple staffing firms that offer consultative solutions, but not really. I wouldn't say they're our principal competition in this work. I'd say it's generally a boutique consulting business, and/or some of the big players, some of the accounting firms, some of the bigger players.
We won an architecture job for building a cloud architecture for a client, and it was a Fortune 500 client who wanted to rethink their cloud environment and the way they were distributing that cloud and embedding security in it. You know, we had a better answer and a quicker answer because we could pull the workforce together and get on it more quickly. There are different reasons why we win. The good news is, because of our account relationships through the staffing business over the last two decades, we're in the dialogue. As long as we're in the dialogue, that gives us a chance to muscle up and present.
Remember, because we build teams that are industry specific, we do use contingent labor along with our own tools and artifacts and technical expertise to lead these engagements. We've found a what I call a unique way of putting together the right team of people to address the need and move them forward. I think that wins today, particularly when some of the consulting firms are having a hard time getting talent.
That's great. If you look out like a few years, like two, three, four years, what do you think of the remaining two-thirds of the enterprise Apex clients that you have? Like, what percentage do you think those could, you know, start migrating towards using you for consulting services?
Well, Ted, shall I go ahead? I don't want to be too bold, but.
Go ahead.
If we have 300 of the Fortune 500, I expect all 300 we can do an array of services for them. I'm sure we'll miss a few, but I'm also sure there's some of the other 200 where we do not provide staffing services that we can provide consulting services. I think we see a big wide open market. By the way, we've pointed ourselves toward the Fortune 1000 now. I mean, we have a strong enough footprint in the sales team that can step up to that. We have a lot of market to still go after.
That's great. One last one. Just with Randy Phillips joining, you know, can you just talk a little bit more about the size of the acquisitions that you might end up looking at or just the cadence of the acquisitions? It's obviously a robust environment and a big pipeline, but just wondering, you know, how we should think about it relative to recent history.
Yeah. Well, look, I think Randy brings years and decades-long expertise in M&A, both in the commercial marketplace and in the government marketplace. While we are able to build pipeline on our own, you know, Randy just enhances that, if you will, and then accelerates our ability to prosecute that while we're all on the day job as well, which is serving our clients. I mean, you should just think about Randy as an experienced piece of incremental muscle to help us prosecute pipeline, build pipeline, and then get to final outcomes here. We're excited to have him on board and, you know, think this is the right time to make an investment in this part of the business.
Terrific. Thank you.
Thank you. At this time, we've reached the end of the question and answer session. I'll now turn the call over to Ted Hanson for closing remarks.
Great. Well, I wanna thank everyone for being on the call today, and we look forward to discussing our fourth quarter results with you in the first part of 2022. Thank you, and be well.
Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation.