Good day, and welcome to B&G Foods first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Today's call, which is being recorded, is scheduled to last about one hour, including remarks by B&G Foods management and a question and answer session. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Sarah Jarolem, Senior Director of Corporate Strategy and Business Development for B&G Foods. Sarah.
Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us. With me today are Casey Keller, our Chief Executive Officer, and Bruce Wacha, our Chief Financial Officer. You can access detailed financial information on the quarter in the earnings release we issued today, which is available at the investor relations section of bgfoods.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that part of the discussion today includes forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon them. We refer you to B&G Foods annual report on Form 10-K and SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our company's future operating results and financial condition. B&G Foods undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
We will also be making references on today's call to the non-GAAP financial measures, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share and base business net sales. Reconciliations of these financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided in today's earnings release. Casey will begin the call with opening remarks and discuss various factors that affected our results, selected business highlights, and his thoughts concerning the outlook of fiscal 2022 and beyond. Bruce will then discuss our financial results for the first quarter 2022 and our guidance for fiscal 2022. I would now like to turn the call over to Casey.
Good afternoon. Thank you, Sarah, and thank you all for joining us today for our first quarter earnings call. The first quarter of 2022 continued to be challenged by inflation and supply recovery. Net sales increased by 5.4% versus the first quarter of 2021, ahead of our expectations. Sales were driven by continued elevated demand compared to pre-COVID levels and higher pricing with relatively low elasticities. However, first quarter adjusted EBITDA declined 16.2% versus last year behind higher than expected inflationary cost pressures accelerated by the war in Ukraine, particularly in oil, wheat, corn, fuel, and other commodities. We expect that our latest pricing initiatives will recover these higher costs in the back half of 2022. There is a lag between higher cost of goods sold and pricing during the first half of 2022.
New pricing actions will take effect in late Q2 and early Q3 with a two to three -month notification and implementation period required by our retail partners. Bruce will talk more specifics on the quarter, including financial and portfolio highlights, but let me address the key factors driving 2022 first quarter results in more detail. Inflation. Total cost of goods sold inflation in 2022 is projected between 19%-20% following the impact of the war in Ukraine and global supply issues. We planned for inflation in the low to mid-teens, but now have line of sight to significantly higher costs. In particular, soybean oil, the primary input to Crisco, is now over $0.80 per pound relative to our projections in January of less than $0.60.
Wheat and corn have reached historical highs because of the Ukraine-Russia disruption, and vegetable costs for Green Giant have risen as farmers shifted crop planting. Freight and delivery costs have also increased sharply behind higher oil prices. Second, pricing. B&G has executed several rounds of pricing actions, trade spend efficiencies, as well as weight reduction initiatives to offset higher input costs. Pricing in Q1 delivered $36.2 million in additional revenue from 2021 increases and additional pricing implemented in late February. More pricing actions have been fielded in March and April that will be implemented between May and early July. Pricing elasticities are generally lower than projected on price increases already reflected on shelves. Third, supply. During Q1, we also experienced supply issues at B&G facilities and co-manufacturers related to Omicron infections and labor and material shortages.
Production output and service levels steadily recovered through February and March, but customer fill rates during Q1 were below 90%. Finally, demand. Most B&G categories and product lines experienced reasonably strong demand relative to prior year and pre-COVID levels. We continued to see consumers eating and preparing more meals at home, partially driven by hybrid work models, with some days during the week spent working remotely in the home. Looking forward, we expect that pricing will catch up to recent inflationary cost spikes in late Q2 in the back half of 2022. Customer fill rates are expected to steadily improve, barring any further disruptions, to enable growth and improve margins.
The outlook for fiscal year 2022 is for net sales to increase more than previous guidance, with pricing elasticities increasing somewhat from current levels. On the bottom line, adjusted EBITDA is projected lower than previous guidance, driven by the lag between new higher costs and pricing actions moving into the market. Overall, we remain consistent on our major priorities. Foremost, managing B&G Foods effectively through the concurrent inflationary pricing and supply environment, which means pricing as quickly as possible to recover higher input costs and increasing production and critical supply to improve service levels above 95%. Second, improving organic growth performance beyond COVID recovery to +1%-2%, capitalizing on the post-pandemic trends of remote working from home and a renewed interest in cooking. Third, focusing on brands and categories where we have the capability, scale, and right to win in terms of resources, investment, and structure.
Fourth, making disciplined acquisitions that are accretive to our portfolio and cash flows and fit with our core expertise in center store dry distribution. Finally, accelerating cost savings and productivity efforts to eliminate non-value-added costs, offset inflation, and strengthen margins longer term. To deliver on these priorities and goals, we are working to reorganize the company operations into four business units, establishing clear focus and expectations within the B&G portfolio. As discussed, these units will define the categories and brands that we will resource and grow, the platforms for future acquisitions, the brands that we'll run for efficiency and cash flow, and the businesses we may exit over time. The business unit structure will also push accountability and multifunctional responsibility down to more closely manage parts of the complex B&G portfolio, improving the speed and clarity of decision-making to deliver growth and financial performance.
The timeline to complete these organization changes is the next three to four months, and I expect to provide specifics on composition structure and performance expectations in late summer or early fall. Finally, before turning the call back to Bruce, I'd like to mention two additional items. First, as we announced in a press release shortly after our earnings release, today we acquired the frozen vegetable manufacturing operations of Growers Express. Growers Express has been our long-term manufacturing partner for our Green Giant riced veggies and our Green Giant veggie spirals, two of our important frozen vegetable innovation products that we launched shortly after acquiring the Green Giant brand. This relatively small acquisition, which closed today, allows us to take greater control of our supply chain, which we expect to improve access to product, help to protect our margins, and also enhance our innovation efforts for the Green Giant brand.
Second, early this quarter, we closed on the previously announced sale of our Portland, Maine manufacturing facility. Thank you, and I will now turn the call over to Bruce.
Thank you, Casey. Good afternoon, everyone. As Casey just discussed, our first quarter was heavily impacted by severe input cost increases across large portions of our portfolio, coupled with continued industry-wide supply chain disruptions that, while improving, has still been a drag on the business. The negative pressures have been offset in part by our pricing initiatives that include list price increases, trade spend reductions, product weigh-outs, and the impact of product mix. These initiatives that we have taken to improve net pricing have been designed to be equally as large. However, due to the lag effect on implementation, our margins have been compressed in the short term.
We expect similar levels of margin compression in the second quarter due to the input cost increases, but our model assumes that our pricing initiatives will begin to catch up to the cost increases and lead to relief beginning late in the second quarter and in the second half of the year. Our supply chain issues continue to improve, and we expect strong net sales performance to continue throughout the year. During the first quarter of 2022, we generated net sales of $532.4 million, adjusted EBITDA of $77.9 million, and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $0.34. Net sales for the first quarter 2022 increased by $27.3 million or 5.4% ahead of our annual targets, despite the supply chain challenges.
Price coupled with mix accounted for $36.2 million of the net sales increase. FX had a negligible impact and volumes accounted for a decrease of $9 million. We believe that supply chain challenges and low fill rates contributed to the majority of the volume declines. We continue to monitor our brands to measure the negative impact of elasticity resulting from our pricing initiatives, but so far, these impacts have been relatively modest and concentrated on a relatively small selection of our brands. Net sales of Crisco increased by $21 million or 36.2%. Net pricing, which we implemented to help offset extreme levels of input cost increases, particularly for soybean oil and canola oil, contributed to the majority of the sales increase for Crisco. However, we also had significant increases in Crisco volumes during the quarter.
Clabber Girl had another strong quarter for net sales as we closed out the baking season. Net sales of Clabber Girl increased by $3.6 million or 20.5% during the quarter. Like Crisco, net sales of Clabber Girl benefited from both price and to a lesser, but still meaningful extent, volume growth. Cream of Wheat benefited from price and volume, driven in part by continued strong demand across the brands portfolio, particularly for our Cream of Rice products, which are showing very strong momentum. Net sales of Cream of Wheat increased by $2.8 million or 15.5%. Net sales of Ortega, which has benefited from increased production capacity from our new taco sauce line in Hurlock, Maryland, increased by $3.6 million or 9.3%.
Maple Grove Farms had another strong quarter, with net sales increasing by $1.2 million or 6%. Green Giant also had modest growth, with net sales increasing by $3.2 million or 2.4% in the quarter. Net sales of Green Giant shelf stable products benefited from a full quarter of lapping against last year's allocation constrained levels and were up by $3.9 million or 11.5%. Net sales of Green Giant frozen products, on the other hand, were slightly down by $0.7 million or 0.7%. Net sales of our spices and seasonings business were off for the first quarter, primarily driven by two factors. First, lapping last year's first quarter was challenging as it was one of the peak performance quarters for the spice category.
Separately, our supply chain constraints, which were challenging late last year and early in the first quarter, had a significant impact on our ability to produce and keep up with demand levels that, while lower than last year, still remain quite elevated. Net sales of our spices and seasonings business decreased by $15.1 million or 14.7% in the first quarter of 2022 when compared to the first quarter of last year. However, when compared to the first quarter of 2020, net sales of our spices and seasonings increased by $14.9 million or 20.4%. We have made significant investments in our Ankeny, Iowa spices and seasonings facility, and we are beginning to see meaningful improvements in our fill rates for this important category of our business.
We expect that our improvements will better enable us to maximize our opportunity in the spices and seasonings category this year. Gross profit was $101.3 million for the first quarter of 2022, or 19% of net sales. Gross profit was $117.8 million in the first quarter of 2021 or 23.3% of net sales. During the first quarter of 2022, gross profit was negatively impacted by higher than expected input cost inflation, which was in many cases higher in the first quarter of 2022 than it was in the fourth quarter of 2021. Our expectation is that input cost inflation will continue to have significant industry-wide impact during fiscal 2022.
As we have discussed on previous calls, we have been able to mitigate a portion of the impact of inflation by locking in prices through short-term supply contracts and advanced commodities purchase agreements, and by implementing cost savings measures. We are also executing various pricing initiatives, including list price increases, trade optimization, and product weight outs. However, these pricing initiatives generally lag behind rising input costs. As such, we are unable to fully offset all of the incremental costs that we faced in the first quarter of 2022. We expect to have similar cost pressures in the second quarter of 2022. Based on current levels of input costs, we expect to see margin recovery in the second half of 2022.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $3.6 million, or 7% to $46.8 million in the first quarter of 2022 compared to $50.4 million in the first quarter of last year. The decrease was composed of decreases in acquisition, divestiture related and non-recurring expenses of $4 million and consumer marketing expenses of $1.5 million, partially offset by increases in selling expenses of $1.7 million, general and administrative expenses of $0.1 million, and warehousing expenses of $0.1 million. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses improved by 1.2 percentage points to 8.8% for the first quarter of 2022 as compared to 10% for the first quarter of 2021.
During the first quarter of 2022, we completed this closure and sale of our Portland, Maine manufacturing facility and recognized the gain on sale, which was partially offset by expenses related to the closure of the facility and the transfer of manufacturing operations. As I mentioned earlier, we generated $77.9 million in adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $92.9 million in the first quarter of 2021. The decrease in adjusted EBITDA was primarily attributable to industry-wide input cost inflation and supply chain disruptions, partially offset by list price increases, trade spend reductions, and the net benefit during the first quarter relating to the Portland closure and sale.
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales was 14.6% in the first quarter of 2022, compared to 18.4% in fiscal 2021. Interest expense was $26.8 million for the first quarter of 2022, compared to $27 million in the first quarter of 2021. Depreciation and amortization was $19.8 million in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $20.3 million in the first quarter of last year. We had an effective tax rate of 24.6% for the quarter, compared to 25.5% in the prior year. We generated $0.34 in adjusted diluted earnings per share in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $0.52 in the prior year.
Despite the margin cost pressures and the decrease in adjusted EBITDA when compared to last year, net cash from operations was relatively flat compared to last year. We generated $25.2 million in net cash from operations in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $26 million in the first quarter of 2021. As I mentioned earlier on the call, we expect second quarter of 2022 to have many similarities to the first quarter. Based on what we know today about costs and what we have implemented in terms of pricing, we expect our price increases to catch up to the cost increases between the end of the second quarter and the beginning of the third quarter.
Directionally speaking, we are expecting a negative impact of more than $200 million for the full year from the combination of material cost increases, factory labor, and logistics. Similarly, we have implemented or are in the process of implementing price initiatives that we expect to generate over $200 million in benefit during the year. We have executed multiple rounds of list price increases already this year and will continue to do so as needed over the course of the year. We expect our various pricing or revenue management initiatives to cover more than 95% of the brands in our portfolio.
With pricing as a large driver of net sales performance for the year, and based on where we finished the first quarter, we are increasing our guidance for net sales to 2%-4% growth, up from a prior guidance of 1%-3% and our traditional long-term growth algorithm of 0%-2%. This implies 2022 net sales of approximately $2.1 billion-$2.14 billion. A key factor that will influence our ability to hit this target includes the impact of any further supply chain disruption on our customer fill rates. Fill rates have begun to recover from the Omicron-related disruption that negatively impacted performance at the end of 2021 and earlier this year.
While we are still far below our customer fill rate expectations, we are beginning to move in the correct direction. We are also watching closely for any signs of negative elasticity. So far, we are experiencing only very modest elasticity in certain brands. As we mentioned previously, supply chain challenges have been the leading driver of top-line performance for the majority of our brands. Based on our current net sales forecast and when factoring in both cost increases and revenue management initiatives, we expect to generate adjusted EBITDA of approximately $348 million-$358 million. Adjusted EBITDA margins will obviously be down, but we do expect a recovery over time when the pace of input cost inflation moderates.
Additionally, we expect interest expense of $110 million- $115 million, including cash interest of $105 million-$110 million. Depreciation expense of $60 million-$65 million. Amortization expenses of $20 million-$22 million. An effective tax rate of 26.5%-27.5%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share of $1.65-$1.75, and CapEx of approximately $50 million. Now I will turn the call back over to Casey for further remarks.
Thank you, Bruce. As discussed, the first quarter showed progress in delivering sales and pricing growth, but could not offset the gross margin impact of escalating input and operating costs. Additional pricing actions have been fielded and implemented to recover higher costs and will flow through in late Q2 in the back half of 2022. We will continue to closely monitor inflation and respond quickly with any further pricing and continued productivity efforts. This concludes our remarks, and now we would like to begin the Q&A portion of our call. Operator?
Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of William Reuter from Bank of America. Your line is now open.
Good afternoon. Once all of the additional price increases have been pushed through, and assuming that we don't have accelerating inflation from here, would we expect that next year you could be kind of back in that 18%-20% EBITDA margins range that you've talked about in the past, or will it still take some time to get there?
I think that would be the goal. The big wild card is what continues to happen with inflation and do we have any more shocks to the system like we had over the first quarter of this year. Certainly that is the goal, to return to those margin profiles.
Okay.
I mean, you know, our pricing is largely gonna recover gross margin dollars. You will have a little natural compression of margins because of the, you know, higher price realization. You know, our goal is to get back to that, as Bruce said, to that 18%-20%. I think, you know, while, you know, costs stay high, you know, we'll probably have a slight margin compression over our long-term goals.
Yep, no, that makes sense on the inflation and the margin rate coming down a bit. I guess my second question, with regard to the change in the organizational structures that's gonna be put in place over the next three to four months. I mean, you mentioned that it's gonna improve speed and agility. Is there any either incremental cost of having more labor, or is this actually gonna result in some cost savings in terms of your headcount?
I think it's largely a reorganization in which we expect to be relatively neutral, you know, in terms of, you know, the total, you know, SG&A or G&A costs associated with the business. It's largely reorganizing ourselves to kind of create multifunctional units which are driving aspects of our business and you know, have people make decisions that are closer to the business and more real time. Our goal is to maintain this at relative cost neutrality. We'll have some puts and takes and some movements and other things that are maybe, you know, some slight restructuring costs. You know, so far, we've designed this to be relatively cost neutral.
Perfect. That's all for me. Thank you.
Our next question comes from, Michael Lavery from Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.
Good afternoon. Thank you.
Hey, Michael.
I just wanna follow up on that margin question. Just trying to understand. I did this quickly. I hope the math is right. Just based on what you have in the bag for the first quarter and what your guidance would point to, it looks like you're guiding 17%-18% EBITDA margins for the rest of the year. I guess if that's right, what really gets you there, and what kind of trajectory does it look like? I think you said it's more second half skewed, which of course would just push those numbers even higher if the second quarter is more similar to the first.
Yeah. Not talking about margins for specific quarter, but directionally, there is expansion. If you think about a lot of the pricing that we're expecting to get this year, it will be in the second half of the year. Most of that is already underway. It just hasn't fully ramped into the business yet, right? You know, there's a process of communicating those price increases to the customers. We need to do that. We need to wait until after the costs have materialized, and then there's a process to go through. You know, very large cost increases this year that we face and very large pricing. That's the biggest driver.
Yeah. We will expect to see better margins in the back half quarters, the back two quarters.
Well, I guess, can you just contextualize it a little bit more on the prior question? You were really referencing kind of an 18% or higher for next year and waiving a little bit of caution around that. I think, the, you know, your guidance is pointing to that in the second half of this year. Is that achievable?
Again, the whole point is premised on input cost increases that we've already seen and price increases. If we have another shock to the system this year in the back half from an input cost, we will have to have additional price increases to take it. If not, the pricing increases should catch up to the cost increases by the back half of the year.
Okay.
I think just to be clear, what we're saying is, you know, our long-term goal is to get to 18%-20%. I think the issue will be that even next year we'll be challenged to get over 18% because of this natural margin compression with, you know, higher realization and higher costs, right?
Gotcha. Can you just give some of the thinking on why the gain on the sale would have been included in adjusted EBITDA? That feels much more like a one-time item.
I don't know. I mean, look, it's an accounting calculation. It's a gain on sale. It was offset in part by some costs that we incurred in terms of factory shutdown. Some of those net against each other in part.
Okay. Thanks a lot.
Yep.
Our next question comes from Carla Casella from JP Morgan. You may now state your question.
Great. Thank you for taking my call. Did you say how much you paid for Growers Express?
We didn't. It was a private transaction. It's on the smaller side, and terms were not disclosed.
They owned the Green Giant license. Was that recently that you sold that to them?
Before our time, actually. They've owned it for years. That's a small piece of the business.
Fresh.
Yeah. Then the other part is they are the manufacturer for two of our kinda long time initiative, innovation products, the spiral veggies and the rice veggies.
Okay, great.
That's really what the transaction was all about.
Are there other opportunities like that to buy, you know, bring someone in-house that you've already been working with? Are you talking, when you mention the M&A, are you talking about, like, what we've seen in the past, brand acquisitions on a larger scale?
Yeah. I mean, there's not a ton of opportunities like this. We're always looking, but in general, you know, we're looking for opportunities similar to what we've done in the past. Obviously, we'll point to the ones that have been more successful than not. You know, that's the role models to do more like what we own, what we have today that's going to do well and build a more focused portfolio. Expectation is to be more disciplined than in the past.
You know, most of our acquisitions will probably be buying, you know, entire businesses. This one just happened to be a great opportunity to integrate our supply chain. There may be some others like this, but really I don't see any on the near-term horizon.
Okay, great. I mean, you continue to look even though your leverage is relatively high. I would assume you're somewhat limited in financing it given how high the leverage is at this point, or is it just a steady process of looking at M&A regardless?
I think it's a steady process of looking. Certainly from a capital structure standpoint, it's got to fit within the context of where our leverage is. You know, we've got debt and equity with which to fund stuff. You know, open for M&A, but you're raising a valid point. We gotta be smart about how we finance things.
Okay, great. Just on the cost increases, you mentioned oil, wheat, corn, fuel. Any of those that you can hedge, you know, so, you know, how far out can you hedge, or are there any that you just can't be hedged?
You know, honestly, we can increase coverage on some of these commodities. To be honest, increasing coverage right now at historical highs doesn't feel like the right thing to do. You know, we just don't know where they're gonna go, and so we try and protect our near-term supply, but we don't go out and hedge long term when the market is at historical highs.
Okay, great. Thanks. I'll get back in queue.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from Karru Martinson from Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Good afternoon. In terms of the reorganization, I thought I heard you say that, you know, there would be a portion of the business that would be positioned, you know, for potential divestitures. I just wanted to get a sense of, you know, what's the magnitude of businesses that you think, you know, may no longer fit with you, if they do not come up to your full standards?
I think, you know, within the business unit structure, we would have, you know, a business unit that was, you know, managing a collection of assets that we would, you know, I think manage for cash flows and stability. Over time, we might decide that some of those businesses don't belong, you know, in our portfolio. I think, you know, in the near term, those are relatively small businesses, not huge. But, you know, we'll always be looking at our portfolio and deciding which businesses we think fit, where are we gonna drive value and add value in the future, and where do we have platforms for future acquisition and roll-up.
When you guys talk about still, you know, being below fill rates, you know, at your end customers, we've been getting kinda mixed signals from grocers and others. You know, some are saying that, you know, they're still seeing strong demand. Others are saying, you know, we're starting to lap tougher comps. Consumers are pulling back a bit. But certainly below fill rates would suggest that the demand is still out there. I mean, what are you guys seeing or hearing from your customers?
I mean, we're hearing that, you know, demand still remains elevated, compared to, you know, pre-COVID levels, so in some of the traditional categories and, you know, in preparing meals and other things. We're still hearing that demand is high, but it is off the COVID, you know, highs.
Mm-hmm.
You know, we continue to see strength behind kind of at-home meal consumption, particularly as people continue to work some parts of their week remotely, which is driving a few more meal occasions like breakfast and lunch. That's coming out pretty clearly in the research. We still are seeing some elevated demand. It's gonna, you know, vary by category in terms of people's behavior. I do expect that you'll see people shift to a little bit more eating out at home on the margin. Again, I think relative to kind of pre-COVID levels, we're still seeing at-home consumption at higher demand.
Thank you very much, guys. Appreciate it.
Thanks, Karru.
Our next question comes from Robert Moskow from Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.
Hi, thanks for the question. Hey, Casey and Bruce, I'm just looking at the cash flow and, you know, first quarter looks a lot like first quarter a year ago. Last year was characterized by working capital being a big use of cash, you know, like a $100 million as you were, you know, chasing an upward inflation curve. It looks like that's playing out again this year. If this is the scenario where, you know, you have another use of cash of that size and depressed free cash flow, you know, what will happen at the end of the year? Does that put too much pressure on your balance sheet? Would you have to do another equity deal, or what do you think?
Yeah, the goal would be to not have quite as much as last year. I still think that there is going to be some. The real pressure that we saw last year was two things. It was the cost inflation, which was a big part of the second half of the year, and the other part was the repricing for Green Giant. We had virtually ran out of product during the, you know, the COVID enhanced period. Last year was a big investment in Green Giant and some others. You're right, there will be some pressure. Don't expect it to be as much as it was last year.
Okay. Is the balance sheet strong enough to handle that or?
Yeah. We would make sure to manage the balance sheet to handle that.
Okay. All right. Thank you.
Thank you. Yep.
We will now take our next question from Eric Larson from Seaport Research Partners. Your line is now open.
Right. Thank you for the question. Two of them from me. First is, and maybe you've talked a little bit about this, but in your prepared comments, you said that you would, you know, obviously, sales are gonna be more elevated than you had expected because of pricing. But then you also threw in there that you're looking for more elasticity. Are you seeing elasticity yet, or is that just from an overabundance of caution?
I think a little bit the latter. So far, what pricing has been implemented in the market that we can track and do some elasticity measurements, we've seen relatively low elasticity. I would not say no elasticity. We have seen some elasticity, but it's relatively low to what our models would have historically predicted. In our future projections, we're predicting that that goes up modestly out of a little bit of caution to not assume that, you know, we're gonna stay at this low level, but maybe go up a little bit more, but still below where we would, you know, expect elasticity be at a historical rate. Because everybody, you know, the entire category is kind of going up.
Got it.
We just, you know, just to be cautious, we've assumed a little bit higher elasticity in our to-go projections. That's the easy answer.
Okay. The other question is, you had mentioned also that you're, I think you're expecting some more, you know, vegetable inflation on the input side and stated that, you know, you think that farmers are gonna be shifting from you know, kind of vegetable acreage into maybe some more of the more traditional row crops like corn, soybeans, wheat, whatever. We haven't really started that planting season much yet. I mean, are farmers telling you that, or are your suppliers saying that there isn't gonna be as much acreage this year? I guess I'm just curious as to what
Those conversations, you know, we kind of lock in planting and contracts, you know, with our vegetable suppliers. We lock those in, you know, kind of in the last month based on what, you know, plantings they're contracting. What we're seeing is that it's, you know, more expensive to get the vegetable planting contracted, I think because a lot of farmers are shifting towards the record high prices in soybeans and corn.
Are you getting the acreage? I understand that it's probably gonna cost you more, but.
Yeah, we're gonna get the acreage.
Okay.
We're gonna get the acreage. That's what we're hearing. It's gonna cost us a little bit more because now we're competing against other land use properties.
Got it. Okay. Yeah. I was.
That's actually one of the things that has changed in the last month for us in terms of our inflation assumptions, that we've got clarity from our, you know, farmers around what we expect to be our, the cost of the new crop coming out, you know, kind of starting in, you know, July, August.
Perfect. I was assuming, I was actually thinking that maybe you were, you know, maybe even anticipating some shortage of supply. I understand what you're saying at this point. Thank you.
So far we're being told that our needs can be met.
Got it. Okay, thanks.
Obviously a lot of that depends on, you know, what kind of a crop really comes out. So far from a planning standpoint, it looks like we can meet our needs.
Thank you. We now have a follow-up question, comes from, Carla Casella of JP Morgan.
I'm just wondering if you could add any color on labor in terms of, do you have any issues with labor? Are labor costs also going up through the year, or are you lapping easier compared from the labor front?
Labor, you know, I think there's two components to this. One is, you know, that we have raised wages in many of our plants to maintain our workforce. In some of our factory markets, you know, we have extremely low unemployment, so it's been difficult to maintain full staffing. This has been improving, I think, quite a bit over the last couple of months. We have raised wages. We've put in new programs to recruit labor. I feel like our labor situation is getting better in most of our factories. There may be still one or two that we're still trying to get back up to full staffing.
You know, I think what you're hearing us say about inflation and cost pressures is that we do expect our direct labor costs in the factories will be up this year over last year to maintain full staffing and to maintain full production.
Great. Thank you.
Okay. Our next question comes from Ken Zaslow from Bank of Montreal. Your line is now open.
Hey, good evening, guys.
Ken, how are you?
Can I just ask one question about what are you seeing on elasticities, and are you seeing any value brands or private label? How do you kind of factor that in, not just this year, but into 2023?
I mean, I think we're still seeing relatively low elasticities. In some of our most price-sensitive products, we might see them to be a little bit higher, but still well below kind of historical model predictions. You know, I think, you know, one of the reasons why we are saying we've kind of raised our expectations on elasticity a little bit, but not, you know, not where it would have been historically, is that we do expect as you know, prices get higher and higher, you know, particularly on some of our products that have really big cost increases, that we will see a little bit of migration to private label. So far, we have not really seen that very broadly. We kind of expect as prices go higher that some of that could happen.
Have you seen any of your competitors not follow, or have you not followed some of your competitors? I'm not sure which one, which comes first, but I'm just trying to make sure that the disparity between you and your competitors are still the same, or has there been any change in that across any parts of your portfolio? I'll leave it there, and I appreciate it.
It's largely the same. You know, sometimes you see, you know, private label or different competitors moving at different rates, but largely, you know, people have responded to the higher input costs.
Great. I appreciate it. Thank you very much.
Thanks, Ken.
There are no further questions at this time. Presenters, you may continue.
Great. Thank you, everybody.
Thank you.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you everyone for participating. You may