Good afternoon, and welcome to Blend's Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Crystal Sumner, Head of Legal Compliance and Risk for the company. With me today are Nima Ghamsari, Co-founder and Head of Blend, Tim Mayopoulos, President, and Marc Greenberg, Head of Finance. After Nima and Marc deliver their prepared remarks, the team will take questions. You can find the supplemental slides on our investor relations webpage at investor.blend.com. During the call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP measures which are reconciled to GAAP results in today's earnings release and in the appendix to our supplemental slides. Non-GAAP measures are not intended to be a substitute for GAAP results. Also, certain statements made during today's conference call regarding Blend and its operations may be considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws.
The company cautions you that forward-looking statements involve substantial risk and uncertainties, and a number of factors, many of which are beyond the company's control, could cause actual results, events, or circumstances to differ materially from those described in these statements. Please see the risk factors we've identified in our most recent 10-K, 10-Q and other SEC filings. We are not undertaking any commitment to update these statements if conditions change, except as required by law. I'll now turn the call over to Nima.
Thank you, Crystal, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I'll cover three things today. First, I'll highlight our Q2 results and business trends, which are reinforcing Blend's underlying growth thesis. Second, I'll lay out our plan for realigning our cost structure and positioning Blend for future profitability. Third, I'll speak to key trends in our business and how we'll continue to win going forward. Starting with Q2 results, we continue to see strong top-line performance, with revenue at $65.5 million for the quarter. We grew our Blend platform revenue by approximately 5% year-over-year against a 37% mortgage market volume decline in the same period. We're continuing to increase our share of funded loan volume even during the current market reset.
Additionally, within our consumer banking marketplace segment, we saw revenue grow by over 50% this quarter as opposed to same period last year, and we have seen an increase in the number of banking transactions every quarter since we launched. On the title front, we are making progress by migrating customers from traditional title to our software-enabled Blend Title solution. Notably, we went live with Mr. Cooper and our Blend Title solution this quarter. I want to quickly call out the impairment charge we recognized on Title365 in our results today. While this is a non-cash charge, it is clearly a significant number. This business was purchased during a much more robust economic and mortgage refinance environment. In light of current market challenges, we performed an assessment of goodwill and intangible assets within the Title365 reporting unit and have recognized an impairment charge.
Title365 has strategic value to Blend and remains a leader in its business. Having Title365 on the Blend platform enables us to deliver vertically integrated mortgage and home equity solutions. Title365 is filling that role in accelerating our path to this objective. Overall, our second quarter revenue and metrics represent continued progress against transforming this industry. I want to be clear that I'm very confident in Blend's long-term opportunity as a result of this progress. That being said, we know there are many things we can do better as a business, starting with our cost structure. As we said last time, we have undertaken a comprehensive view of our P&L in light of the change in market conditions. Today, we'll share our plans, our targets for cost alignment, and what the long-term operating model for the company will look like.
The headlines are. First, we are operating the company prudently as if mortgage industry unit volumes will remain at or near historic lows through 2025. Despite this, we expect to achieve positive free cash flow during that time. Second, along the way, we plan to reduce our non-GAAP net operating loss by 50% from current levels by the end of 2023. Third, we believe we can achieve these goals with our current capital base, which includes $475 million in liquidity at quarter end, inclusive of our $25 million ongoing line of credit, while reserving options to manage our capital structure opportunistically going forward. Our plans include specific targeted ranges for gross margin and for the primary components of operating expenses.
I'll let Marc walk through those details shortly, but first, I'd like to give an overview of the key initiatives we're undertaking. Our first and most immediate lever is our cost of labor. Since April, we have eliminated over 400 positions or 25% of our workforce, including the elimination of backfills. We should see the full impact of these actions by Q1 2023. In aggregate, both actions are expected to reduce our annualized expenses by approximately $60 million. We will continue to monitor and adjust this cost base as market conditions warrant. We have also significantly limited hiring, focusing on the most important positions for the company. Our second lever is offshoring. Through our acquisition of Title365, we expanded our geographic reach to India, home to two full-scale operational hubs that currently support our title business.
We believe our India operations provide a foundation that can support the entirety of Blend, and work is already underway to streamline our corporate support functions and shift work where we historically relied on third-party vendors. Third, we are taking decisive steps to achieve near-term cost efficiencies in non-personnel spending across our products and corporate functions. These steps include consolidating third-party vendor spend across tools, services, and partnerships, as well as driving down deployment costs and shortening deployment windows through bundling moves which can drive efficiencies for both Blend and our customers. Our fourth lever, and one of the big long-term ones, is product prioritization and increased rigor around return on investment.
We are prioritizing product lines that we believe can deliver ROI on a relatively short time horizon. We are emphasizing solutions that are high value to our customers and that reflect our assessment of customer needs and demands over the next 12 months. We will be disciplined in measuring success and flexible in allocating capital as return potential dictates. While I fully anticipate this initiative will make us more disciplined in our R&D programs, I also want to be clear that we will continue to invest in sustaining and adding value to our key products to ensure we are growing and deepening our customer relationships for the long term. Our goal across all of these cost reduction efforts and investment initiatives is to make Blend stronger for the long term, to not only sustain us during this tough period, but well into the market rebound.
The benefits of the changes we are making will not arrive in a linear fashion, but we commit to keeping you posted on progress towards the headline goals I shared earlier. In addition to our cost structure plan, we are focused on top line growth. Our growth is inextricably linked to that of our customers, and I think about our growth drivers parallel to the customer journey with Blend as we deploy, deepen, and broaden our suite of products. In Q2, we reported gross revenue retention of 99%, roughly in line with 98% in Q1, and market-adjusted net revenue retention of 164%, up from 159% in Q1. Additionally, we have a healthy pipeline of customers who have signed but have yet to deploy, so there are built-in revenue opportunities that we have good visibility on.
Our differentiated mortgage product allows us to win customers in this tight margin environment. One recent example is PNC Bank, one of the largest diversified financial institutions in the U.S., which went live with our mortgage solution in Q2 in under six months from signing, and work is underway to launch our close product as well. In addition, because we continue to add value to our platform on a regular basis, we are able to responsibly raise price with our customers. We're seeing consistent quarterly uplifts in pricing per transaction. Specifically, we've seen more than half of our renewals in Q2 at higher rates because of the value we continue to add to our platform on a regular basis, which adds value to our customer base.
Within our consumer banking marketplace segment, we grew revenue 53% year-over-year in Q2 and remain on pace with our plan to double this business in 2022 as compared to 2021. We are seeing customers start with mortgage but stay for our end-to-end platform solution. At the end of the second quarter, 71% of customers used multiple Blend solutions, reflecting increase from 59% in the prior year. Notably, our income verification and close solutions are in high demand, and we're seeing significant growth in our home equity suite as that market heats up. Putting this all together, we are making progress, and we are strengthening Blend for the long term. However, 2022 forecasted mortgage industry volumes have come down materially since we released our initial guidance in March.
Despite that, we've only brought down our Blend Platform outlook modestly, reflecting both our outperformance relative to industry declines and the growth we are seeing in our home equity offering. Overall, this guidance change for Blend Platform is offset by a like-for-like increase in Title revenue in light of better than expected performance on that side due to home equity and default business. Marc will provide more details on our guidance update in a few minutes. To summarize, we remain optimistic in our ability to execute and delivered another solid revenue quarter as we continue to grow market share. We plan to continue to optimize our cost structure, streamline our support functions, and prioritize products that generate near-term ROI, such that we can generate free cash flow under a prolonged market reset.
We're positioning ourselves as a category creator as we continue to drive innovation through our software solution for digital banking. I want to end by saying that at Blend, we're playing to win, and we're playing to win big. We are not playing to avoid losing. There's a once-in-a-lifetime industry transformation happening right now. Most banking products are still analog and processed in a manual way by humans. They lack a modern software stack that works across the bank to deepen relationships with their customers at a lower cost. We believe the lenders and banks who adopt our technology will come out the other side winners. That's our role in the industry as a trusted partner to hundreds of financial institutions across the country. We're going to continue to play to win. Thanks. Now let me turn it over to Marc.
Thanks, Nima, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll walk through our financial results and provide context in the following order. First, I'll start with a recap, including how we're performing in this mortgage cycle. Second, I'll provide more color on our recent plan and future efforts to reduce our cost structure as part of our broader capital management strategy. Last, I'll provide context around our guidance revision and how we expect to see trends unfolding for the rest of the year. We'll open up for questions. Let's start with the highlights from Q2. Our results reflect continued outperformance in mortgage banking relative to the industry and solid growth in our consumer banking and marketplace offerings, offset by declines in the legacy title business. Total revenues for the quarter were $65.5 million.
Blend Platform segment revenue was $33.6 million, notably up about 5% year-on-year, despite a 37% decline in mortgage originations volume in the same period. Title365 segment revenue was $31.9 million. Shifting to consumer banking and marketplace, we achieved revenue of $8.5 million this quarter, up from $5.6 million or 53% as compared to the prior year period. Year-on-year, total consumer banking transactions grew by approximately 138,000 to approximately 215,000 in Q2, supporting in particular the increase we observed in our home equity revenue as compared to the prior quarter. Closing up the revenue discussion, we recognized $1.2 million in professional services revenue.
Moving to gross profit, Q2 non-GAAP gross profit was approximately $25.8 million, up from $19.9 million in the prior year period. Current period non-GAAP gross profit includes $20.6 million attributable to Blend Platform and $5.2 million to Title365. Products like Blend Income, Blend Close, and Blend Title are lower margin than some of our other product lines, and as those products ramp up, but before they get to scale, our aggregate margins will be diluted. We expect our medium-term non-GAAP Blend Platform gross margins to be in the low 60% range. Non-GAAP operating expenses for the second quarter totaled $65.3 million, compared with $46.2 million in the prior year, which is primarily attributed to increased costs associated with Title365.
Keep in mind when comparing year-over-year that last year's Q2 was our final quarter without many expenses associated with operating as a public company. As you can see in our financial supplement, our non-GAAP loss from operations was $39.5 million versus $26.3 million in the prior year. This quarter, we also recognized approximately $392 million non-cash charge to reflect impairment of Title365 goodwill and intangible assets driven by a decline in the fair value of the Title365 reporting unit. Now turning to our balance sheet. Our cash equivalents, and marketable securities on June thirtieth totaled $450 million. Our $25 million revolving line of credit remains undrawn.
We believe we have ample runway and liquidity in light of the cost reduction efforts we've outlined today, noting that our $225 million term loan does not come due until 2026. Further, as Nima noted, we have additional cost levers to pull depending on the depth and severity of the mortgage banking downturn, and we will be opportunistic when it comes to improving our capital position. As Nima highlighted at the top of the call, we're introducing a number of operating improvement initiatives with clear objectives that define our path to positive free cash flow and ultimately profitability. That plan has started with our two announced workforce reductions. The second in August included approximately 220 positions, which when taken together with our actions in April, affected over 400 positions and approximately 25% of our pre-reduction workforce.
Layering in the April reduction, these eliminated positions represent annualized compensation expenses of over $60 million. While a majority of the reductions were in Title365, where our needs were reduced both due to anticipated lower refi volumes near term and our migration of legacy Title365 customers to Blend Title, we also undertook significant reductions in parts of our general and administrative operations. We expect cost savings associated with the RIFs to materialize starting in Q1 2023. As Nima mentioned, we're also undertaking a transition of business processes and corporate support to India, and that work is already underway. As we expand our capabilities in India, we'll be able to share more detail on future calls. What I can share today, however, is the progress we've been making on reducing our vendor expenses.
We are reducing our vendor spend by at least $6 million per quarter in 2023. We're achieving this through the continued maturation of processes in G&A, commercial operations, and cloud operations. We're also moving some work in-house and moving it offshore. We're reducing the number of vendors we have and simplifying where we can, and we're undertaking more robust negotiations with those we decide to retain. When complete, we believe the steps we're taking will significantly impact our current model as we move towards profitability. As we execute towards profitability in the medium term, this is directionally where we expect costs as a % of revenue to land. We expect G&A expense to be reduced a further 20% in 2023, with a medium-term operating goal to get G&A to the low teens% of annual revenue.
We're also targeting sales and marketing expense to land in the 20s% of revenue in the medium term, though there is a wider range of outcomes here depending on the pace of and opportunity for revenue growth, noting that commission sales fall into this bucket. Finally, we expect R&D expense to be in the high 10s-low 20s on our road to profitability. I want to emphasize what Nima said earlier, and that is we are operating the company to achieve positive free cash flow under the assumption that mortgage industry unit volumes will remain at or near historic lows through 2025. We're in the early stages of executing on this plan, so the composition within our operating expense lines may shift over time and may not be linear. I also want to touch on gross margins.
Especially in challenging and uncertain markets like this, our product offers customers a cost-competitive advantage to in-house development that is best in class. As our product matures and we continuously enhance our offering, our incremental value has outpaced the price we charge. In addition to applying discipline and increasing scale to drive our cost to deliver even lower, we are taking steps to ensure our pricing is reflective of the full cycle value we offer to our customers. As Nima mentioned, we've seen more than half of our renewals in Q2 at higher rates. We expect this trend to persist. As a result, we're targeting medium-term Blend Platform gross margin in the mid-60% range. This may seem below some of the current targets of our software peers. However, our platform gross margin will be determined by shifting mix across our growing product suite.
We have some very high gross margin products and some that will carry lower margins, like income verification. These products are strategically important and a reliable source of significant incremental gross profit dollars at scale. Of course, cost reduction is only half of the margin equation. As Nima highlighted, we continue to see growth drivers that reinforce market share gains within mortgage, ongoing revenue diversification led by consumer banking and marketplace, and the opportunity to responsibly increase prices as we deliver greater value to our customers. To summarize, we're taking immediate steps to reduce and manage our personnel spend. We're taking immediate steps to reduce and manage our third-party vendor spend. We are planning further efficiencies through offshoring, and we are taking concrete steps to prioritize profitable revenue growth. Nima shared a goal of exiting 2023 with our non-GAAP net operating loss reduced to 50% of current levels.
This is how we plan to achieve it. I'll wrap up now with 2022 guidance and our near-term outlook. In light of prevailing market conditions, we have adjusted our 2022 revenue guidance for the Blend Platform down by $5 million while raising the 2022 revenue guidance for the Title365 segment up by $5 million. We are affirming our full year guidance range of between $230 million and $250 million in consolidated revenue in 2022, with between $135 million and $145 million in the Blend Platform segment.
On the Title365 side, we're raising our guidance range of $90-$100 million to $95-$105 million, largely attributed to the outperformance of our default and home equity products within that segment, which is expected to offset the decline in origination title volume. While this inflationary environment and market reset presents challenges, we remain focused on things that are within our control. This includes meaningfully reducing our cash burn through aligning our operating structure with current market volume, streamlining processes, increasing our operational efficiency across the company, and adopting a capital-efficient growth model for the near term. This also means narrowing the scope of our strategic priorities while continuing to grow penetration of our platform in the market.
Wrapping up, the first half of 2022 has been a challenging one for the industry, but we remain optimistic about our costs, revenue, and growth drivers that are within our control. With that, I'd like to thank you for joining us. Crystal, we are now ready for questions.
Thank you, Marc and Nima, for your remarks. We'll now turn to Q&A. Our first question comes from Matt Stotler from William Blair.
Hi. Thank you for taking the questions. Maybe just to start with one on the Blend Title transition, transitioning that title business over to the core Blend platform. You know, you talked about that starting in mid-2022. It seems like that's kind of early in terms of progression, but we're seeing a little bit of outperformance on the Title365 side. Just any update on the expected transition to the core Blend Title platform and the updated timeline there?
The outperformance on the Title365 side is really because they have built in countercyclical offsets, right? They have the default business as well as the home equity business. That's where you're seeing the outperformance on the Title365 side. Otherwise, the Mr. Cooper transition is going great. They've been a wonderful partner for us, and we're ready for the increase in volume in the second half of the year.
Next question comes from Joseph Vafi from Canaccord Genuity. Please feel free to unmute yourself and go ahead. Looks like he might be muted.
Hello, can you hear me?
Can.
Yes. All right. Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. Sorry for the background noise. I was wondering if you could just give us a little bit more flavor on the demand environment of new logos, you know, where you can kind of continue to see banks do a lot of digital transformation, but, you know, wanted to get an updated view from you on the pulse on the mortgage side. Thanks a lot.
Yeah, sure. Thanks for the question. On the mortgage side, we mentioned one new logo in PNC. Both our mortgage side and the add-ons for mortgage pipeline remains strong, and specifically add-ons around close and verification of income. The reason those remain strong is because efficiency really matters in a time of market margin compression. We're seeing intense focus from our customers around implementing digital technology and implementing more digital technology than they had before. Actually, you know, we feel good about our mortgage side, and we'll continue to invest there going forward.
Next question comes from Ryan Tomasello from KBW. Please feel free to unmute and go ahead.
Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess just digesting all the operating targets correctly, maybe you could say if there's a consolidated top line revenue growth target that's associated with these, you know, halving of the net operating loss and break even over that 2025 time horizon, whether or not that's by segment or just on a consolidated basis. I think that would be helpful just for us to understand, you know, the bridge between both the OpEx as well as the top line modeling here.
Yeah. Thanks, Ryan. We're using MBA as our guide for the mortgage volumes. They're frankly more conservative than Fannie, so we've made a transition to the MBA forecast going forward. It's a pretty volatile market out there. All of our growth metrics are moving in the right direction. We're not gonna give specific revenue guidance at this point. We'll just focus on now to the end of the year, and then we'll try and update you as best we can.
Next question comes from Maddie Schrage from KeyBanc.
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I was wondering if you could talk a bit about how you're thinking about multi-year conditions for the mortgage industry, you know, with respect to new mortgages versus refis and what factors you're planning on monitoring to see any signal of a rebound in demand. Just a follow-up: what type of visibility do you have in terms of share gains based on your current pipeline? Thanks.
Yeah, sure. First of all, you know, it's hard to project forward mortgage volumes beyond 2023. There's good industry MBA forecasts, for example, in 2023 and less so 2024 and beyond. We're taking a prudent approach to the beyond years and saying it's gonna remain flat, which is, you know, near all-time lows through that period. We're managing the business as if even if it remains flat, we still get to that cash flow positive and profitable measures of the company. Things that we're paying attention to, you know, obviously interest rates, how new home purchases are going. You know, there's been differing things happening in the market.
Ultimately, at the end of the day, we're focusing on primarily on the things within our control, which is growing our market share. On your, on your second question on market share, we do spend quite a bit of time looking at how much total volume there is out there and who the best targets are. We mentioned PNC, but there's a number of others that we've also signed in the last few months that have continued to grow our volume base as well as rolling out customers that we sold before that, which is why you're seeing us outperform in the mortgage segment compared to the market. Like we said, it's down 37% year-over-year on our mortgage segment is nothing, not down even yearly that much. That's one piece.
The other piece in consumer banking more broadly, we continue to win there, whether it's home equity or personal loans or other aspects of the mortgage life cycle that we haven't touched yet. We continue to increase our diversification of revenue, which has been a great way for us to not just expand our revenue base, but expand our TAM and create some countercyclical measures that make us less exposed to interest rates that might negatively impact revenue if things change.
Before we turn to the next question, just a reminder that if you have questions, please feel free to raise your hand and get in queue. Our next question comes from Terry Tillman from Truist. Please feel free to mute, unmute and go ahead.
Yeah, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my two-part question. The first part of it is maybe for Mark in terms of mortgage transactions. I think it was in the first quarter Q. It was 376,000. Can you share what the actual mortgage transactions were in 2Q? The second part of my question is for either Marc or Nima. It's good to hear there's a healthy pipeline in terms of new mortgage and consumer banking customers. Have you all tweaked your assumptions because of the macro on the timing of them rolling out? Are those the rollout schedules remaining resilient? Thank you.
In terms of mortgage banking transactions, in page 15 of the supplement, we outline 348,000 mortgage banking transactions, 215,000 consumer banking transactions. Yeah, we went from 380 to 348 in Q2, and those numbers we do update as we get more information from our customers. The second part of the question. Sorry, Terry, could you give us that second part again?
The second part of the question, sorry, I missed that on slide 15. Thanks for the reference though.
No worries.
The second part of the question is just related to, you're talking about a healthy pipeline in terms of.
Oh.
You know, one business. What I'm curious about is sometimes what we're hearing is there can be just a slower pace of rollouts because of just macro factors, lack of staffing, et cetera. Have you all changed in the last 90 days how you're thinking about these rollout schedules that could impact platform revenue in 3Q and 4Q? Thank you.
Not materially. You know, we've been planning some of these rollouts with our customers for a while. They staffed up for them. Like we said, the pipeline for new business is also healthy, you know, especially around things like home equity and income and close. On both of those fronts, we feel pretty good, and it reflects in our guidance. I think that Mark touched on our guidance and what we changed there, but it reflects in our guidance as well that we're not materially changing the guidance despite the market coming down quite a bit. I would just call out one other thing. When we roll out with customers nowadays versus maybe two years ago, we often roll out with multiple solutions at once.
Like for example, we have a top 20 bank rolling out with our mortgage solution, you know, towards the back half of this year. They're gonna have multiple solutions when they go live on day one. They're gonna have our mortgage and our income together, which is a little bit of a different situation than what we did before. That allows us to get them value faster and also it's obviously good for us and our consumers as well.
Next question comes from Michael Turrin from Wells Fargo. Please feel free to unmute and go ahead.
Hey there. Thanks. Appreciate you taking the question. I mean, you mentioned the industry volume declines. We can see it in just the mortgage banking transactions disclosed. Yet you're able to hold on to the combined revenue target for the year here still. Just wanted to spend a moment on the offsets. Is this a function of having taken a conservative lens around mortgage since the start of the year? Is the growth you're seeing on the consumer banking transaction side providing enough of an offset? What are you seeing that helps you hold onto the outlook here? Anything you can add around just what's assumed for rest of year and if there's any cushion if the macro were to continue to worsen, I think is just very useful context. Thank you.
You bet. Thanks, Michael. There were some slightly unexpected offsets in the Title365 business in default and home equity, maybe being a little bit better than we expected. We've been able to responsibly increase prices across our customer base on renewal in particular. It's really in line with the value that we're delivering. That's some offset. I wouldn't characterize our guidance as cushioned, but I think it's prudent.
Next question comes from Ryan Tomasello from KBW.
Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking the call. Just wanted to drill down into Title365 and the migration there, I guess following up on earlier questions. Can you talk about the margin uplift you expect when migrating Title365 clients to the Blend Title product? Maybe remind us how that product is priced relative to the Legacy product and, you know, the gross margin you would expect on a Blend Title transaction versus the same revenues coming from Legacy Title. I guess, you know, wrapping that up, just the timeline for fully winding down the Legacy Title Title365 revenues and what percentage you would expect to ultimately capture on the Blend Title product. Thanks.
Sure. We're really in the early days of the transition to software-enabled Title. There's no change in pricing and, we're not really offering any guidance on the eventual margins. We think this builds in. It's a comprehensive product that makes it better for consumers and better for lenders. It's an integrated product that's that delivers more value, particularly in the instant home equity that we've been talking a lot about with an integrated title solution. At this point, there's not much more I can say, I don't think, about the margins on the title side. I think we're in early days here, Ryan.
Next question comes from Matt Stotler from William Blair.
Hey, thank you for taking the follow-up. Just maybe one on the marketplace opportunity here. Obviously, consumer banking and marketplace is where you're seeing a lot of growth. You've mentioned a couple components of that on the consumer banking side. Any update on, I guess the marketplace ecosystem generally, and then, you know, any plans to monetize that going forward?
The consumer banking and marketplace includes all non-mortgage consumer banking transactions, so personal loans, home equity, credit cards, deposit accounts. Those dollars are in there. It includes, you know, things like property and casualty insurance that are coming to scale, that we've been at for a couple of years now. Then going forward, it'll eventually likely include the software-enabled Title, right? So, I mean, that has been a great offset, a diversification of our revenue. It's countercyclical to the underlying, many of those are countercyclical to the underlying mortgage transactions. Now, is that where you're going, Matt?
Yeah, yeah. In terms of, I think, what I was more focused on is as you think about things like, you know, homeowners insurance and things like that you're building into the consumer journey, and being able to monetize that kind of part of the journey, you know, where that fits in. Obviously, there's a number of different, you know, places where the marketplace, or you can establish marketplaces within that journey, and you've talked to them at length historically. Yeah, more on just that component of the broader journey and being able to add those in and monetize, you know, those ecosystems, as part of the broader consumer journey.
The one that's probably being monetized the most today, Matt, is the homeowner's insurance, property and casualty insurance. That one's already in our flow, used by a number of our customers. We also have a bunch of partnerships on that front as well. That's the one that's probably furthest along. Right next is Title, which like we said, we're migrating over as another marketplace. We don't have anything in the valuation side quite yet, although we're talking to a number of partners on that valuation being whether it's automated or automated valuations, AVMs or appraisals.
There's a few other things that we've talked about in the flow that could help for identity and fraud that might be able to help us continue to add value to whether it's the home ownership journey or the broader consumer financial journey. We'll continue to do that opportunistically. I will say, just going back to my commentary around ROI for products, we are being very thoughtful about the things that can drive the most value for our customers and consumers in a short time horizon. We're making sure we focus our energy around those kinds of things and make sure we deliver on those things to the end before we go and expand to too many new things that rededicate focus to the company.
Next question comes from Terry Tillman from Truist. Please feel free to unmute.
Yeah, thanks for my follow-up. Marc, it's a question for you. I think you're all talking about $60 million worth of comp expense coming out of the model through the various actions. I hope I have that right. It's kind of a timing question in terms of, I mean, some of this takes time to flow through the model, but is there any general sense you could give us on how kind of the loss profile could look like 3Q versus 4Q, maybe in relationship to what we saw in 2Q with the $39 million loss? Thank you.
You bet. Thanks, Terry. Yeah. Some of those costs were not fully annualized, obviously. We grew a lot in the second half of 2021. In terms of the net loss, I wouldn't assume a materially different net loss in Q3 and Q4 relative to Q1 and Q2. Remember, there's some challenges on the revenue side that we're also trying to offset. On a net-net, costs do come down marginally, but we're also addressing a volume decrease, particularly on refinance and at Title365.
Now we'll be addressing submitted questions from investors via the Say platform. Our first question is: Is Blend Labs adding other financial products to its line of offerings?
Yeah, that's a good question, and it goes back again to our ROI. We're making sure we figure out the products that mean the most to our customers and consumers. We're gonna be constantly adding new financial products. I wanna make one side note, which is our investment in Blend Builder, which we've talked about quite a bit. It's our low-code drag-and-drop platform to make it possible to create these new products with fewer R&D resources, which makes the ROI equation that much more appealing for us to be able to deliver those things. Expect to see some announcements from us in the coming months as we respond to changes in environment. There's some new products that make a lot of sense given the new market environment and all the vertically integrated capabilities we have.
You know, so stay tuned on that, and we'll come out to market and with some things here in the next few months.
Another question from investors via the Say platform. How are you managing the current tension between growth and profitability?
Yeah, I hope I addressed a little bit of this earlier in my remarks, but I wanna explicitly call out that managing profitability as a standalone, you know, is relatively straightforward. Managing growth as a standalone is relatively straightforward. It's much easier to do those things in a vacuum. Doing it together, figuring out that right harmony between those two things is extremely difficult. That's the hard part. That's the thing that we've been spending a lot of time on, and you kinda heard a little bit about what we're cutting back on, what product lines we're cutting back on, what internal corporate support we're cutting back on.
You're seeing some of the plans to become more profitable by cutting back on some of those things, and we'll continue to do so, as well as driving those high ROI products for our customers in the short and medium term. Combine those two things will give us enough fuel to continue to grow while not overly consuming the precious capital that we have, and we wanna make sure that we retain for the long term.
Another question from the Say platform. How would you characterize the competitive environment? Related, what are your perspectives on consolidation in this sector?
Well, we certainly pay close attention to our competitors. We're, you know, a very paranoid company in the sense that we're constantly looking at what's going on in the market. That being said, I think nothing has materially changed in the competitive environment during the last few quarters. Just to reiterate what some of the competitive environment looks like, at the top end of the market, our primary alternative to Blend is an internal build. At the medium and lower end of the market, it's, you know, typically point solutions that we compete against.
In both cases, Blend is sort of a premium offering that can work across products, and we'll continue to invest in that to continue to win and grow market share, which we've done historically, and we've shown even in this quarter that we've been able to do. We have seen some, in terms of the consolidation, we have seen some consolidation both in terms of our customers merging together, which is, you know, ultimately good for Blend as it becomes a more concentrated industry with customers that rely on us across the bank or lender. We've also seen some point solutions out in the market become part of larger platforms. I actually expect both of those trends to continue. We'll pay attention. We'll continue to be paranoid and react where necessary accordingly.
Overall, I will say that there's nothing that's materially changed in the competitive landscape for us in the last few quarters.
The last question I'll take is also from the Say platform. What has the sales environment been like in this downturn? Are customers pushing off digital transformation initiatives?
Yeah, maybe this is a corollary to what Terry from Truist was saying, which is, you know, are people pushing off these implementations and rollouts or these new buying opportunities? I'll say, one, I think a lot of those things, those software companies where the rollouts are getting pushed out or people are getting negotiated down are nice to have platforms in the sense that they feel like their organization can live without a new data warehouse or without a new BI reporting tool. I'm not specifically calling those out as things that are not important, but I just think if those things slip two or three or four quarters, it doesn't materially affect the revenue of the organization.
Whereas Blend, you know, given where we sit for our customers and how we try to help them modernize acquiring customers and serving their customers, you know, we're not a non-essential solution. We partner very closely with our customers to be that essential solution that helps them deliver better experiences across the bank at a lower cost. Cost is something that they don't want to be spending more money than they need to for a longer period of time. We actually help them lower their costs as opposed to adding to their cost base. We're not a non-essential solution. Too, I think, to add on to that, I think our customers will continue to invest in downturn as some of the customers that we have, given where we play in the market, at the.
You know, we have often some of the largest lenders and banks in the country as customers. They take a long-term view of the market. You know, I've been very encouraged by the fact that when I talk to our customers, they are really there on offense. I mean, I said we're playing to win as Blend, to be this platform that can be used across all these products to serve these modern you know, banking experiences to consumers with that through our customers. Our customers are taking the same approach. They wanna play to win. Not so they're not the same in the next cycle, but they're even bigger and better than they were in the last cycle.
Lastly, you know, because we are a company that drives ROI for them, we often are somebody that they wanna bet on to help get them there. Just one supporting, you know, sort of anecdotal data, you know, we track quotas for sales reps, and we're beating our quotas in the verification of income and home equity, which are really important business lines for us. You know, in Q3 so far, we're tracking strongly for those business lines again. We'll continue to invest in those products as long as they can drive that ROI for our customers.
Being our last question, this conference has now concluded. Thank you all for your participation, and you may now disconnect your lines.