Greetings and welcome to Bix Moore Property Group, Inc. 1st Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
It's now my pleasure to introduce your host, Stacy Slater, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Capital Markets. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining Brix Morris' Q1 conference call. With me on the call today are Jim Taylor, Chief Executive Officer and President and Angela Ahmed, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as well as Mark Horgan, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and Brian Finnegan, Executive Vice President, Chief Revenue Officer, who will be available for Q and A. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that some of Comments today may contain forward looking statements that are based on certain assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties as Also, we will refer today to certain non GAAP financial measures. Further information regarding our use of these measures and reconciliations of these measures to our GAAP results are available in the earnings release and supplemental disclosure on the Investor Relations portion of our website. Given the number of participants on the call, we kindly ask that you limit your questions to 1 or 2 per person.
If you have additional questions regarding the quarter, please re queue. At this time, it's my pleasure to introduce Jim Taylor.
Thank you, Stacey, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our call. I'm extremely grateful for how this Brixmor team continues to deliver. Our performance prior to, during and now emerging from the and the disciplined execution of the business plan we implemented nearly 5 years ago. But just don't just take my word for it.
Simply look at our NOI performance in 2019, 2020 and now emerging from the pandemic in 2021. In each period, our performance stands apart. And when you stack that performance for the entire timeframe, the difference is even more striking. This pandemic has revealed several fundamental truths about the shopping center business, including the durability and resilience of our asset class, The importance of being within the last mile of the consumer and the flexibility of our format, but among the most important truths is We believe having a high rent basis is a potential liability, not an asset. We further believe having an attractive rent basis enhances call.
That should be applied to our centers. Said differently, it's not where ABR is, but where it's going. At Brixmor, our attractive rent basis and value added execution position us to substantially outperform as the economy accelerates post pandemic. The markers of that coming outperformance are evident in our sector leading leasing volumes, our building forward leasing pipeline, Our strong cash spreads on new and renewal leases, our continued delivery of accretive reinvestments and importantly the impact those reinvestments tab on our asset value. During the quarter, the national and regional teams executed leasing at a blistering pace under Brian's leadership, Signing 1,400,000 square feet of new and renewal leases with cash spreads on new leases of over 20%.
With 140 new leases executed during the quarter, new lease productivity was on par with the peak in 2019. We will provide additional color in the question and answer session, but encouragingly, we are seeing demand across all of our including specialty grocery, home, general merchandise, value apparel, pets, restaurants and health and wellness. Also, we're seeing a remarkable recovery in demand from small shop tenants, including national, regional and local tenants, allowed us to drive sequential growth of 40 basis points in our small shop lease occupancy during what is typically a seasonally slow quarter. This improvement in small child demand, which in part reflects the fruits of our reinvestment program and enhanced operating 1 will be yet another level of or lever of growth as we move through the recovery. And our forward visibility on growth continue to improve this quarter as our productivity and executed leases drove over $40,400,000 of signed but not yet commenced revenue, which is equally balanced pipeline, which currently stands at over 2,200,000 square feet and 41,200,000 of ABR.
We continue to execute under our reinvestment program under Bill and Hite's leadership, delivering another $28,000,000 of value enhancing investment And an incremental return of 11% with another $400,000,000 of projects underway and an average return of 9%. These projects not only drive great ROI while enhancing our centers, they also create value through reducing the cap rate that would be applied to the Nearly 10%. Just on the capital deployed, we've created huge value given those accretive yields. But in fact, those investments have also reduced the applied cap rates on the impacted centers, centers that comprise nearly 30% of our total NOI. That cap rate compression is a value multiplier.
And for those of you focused on growth in NAV, I would invite you to review the projects we have We are also seeing positive momentum from an external growth perspective under Mark's leadership. We are pleased to announce subsequent Quarter end, the $48,500,000 acquisition of the Center of Bonita Springs, located on the prime corner of 1 of the busiest intersections in Southwest Florida. With an exceptionally highly productive grocer, the center, which is our 48th in the state, We'll generate tremendous upside as we execute the repositioning of an underperforming anchor currently paying only $2 a foot in rent as well as lease up the small shop space, which is currently at 60% occupied. Mark and team continue to see their pipeline and build of target assets in our core markets that will yield great opportunities for us to continue to leverage our platform and generate growth. And under Angela's leadership, our balance sheet remains very strong with more than ample liquidity to capitalize on what we believe will be a growing External growth perspective, I'm particularly pleased with how the ongoing execution of our balanced business plan that we communicated over 4 years ago has demonstrated outperformance both through the pandemic and as we emerge in 2021, 2022 and beyond.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Angela for a more detailed look at our results this quarter and our improved outlook.
Thanks, Jim, and good morning. As Jim highlighted, the Q1 further demonstrated the resiliency of our portfolio and the strength of our tenancy as we leverage our platform to capitalize on the ongoing recovery. NAREIT FFO was $0.44 per share in the Q1, reflecting $3,000,000 or $0.01 per share of items that impact FFO comparability, including litigation and non routine legal expenses and loss on debt In addition to $1,600,000 or $0.01 per share of straight line rental income reversals. Same property NOI growth was negative 1 point 5% in the Q1 as base rent and net recoveries detracted from growth and were offset by positive contributions from ancillary and other income, Revenues deemed uncollectibles and percentage rents. While base rent and net recoveries were impacted by 150 basis point year over year decline in build occupancy, Base rent was also impacted by 120 basis points of lease modification deferral agreements and abatements, the majority of which were reserved for in 2020.
For those previously reserved, the result is a geography change between base rent and revenues deemed uncollectible this quarter with no net impact to same property NOI or FFO. Total revenues deemed uncollectible totaled $4,000,000 in Q1, representing an $8,000,000 sequential improvement. Revenues deemed uncollectible this quarter was comprised of approximately $11,000,000 related to 1st quarter build base rent, dollars 2,000,000 related to prior period base And $1,000,000 related to net recovery or reimbursement income, which were collectively offset by the $2,000,000 of lease modification and abatement geography adjustments that I highlighted earlier and nearly $8,000,000 of cash collected on base rent amounts previously reserved. As we look forward, it remains challenging to predict the exact trajectory of revenues deemed uncollectible. That said, we are encouraged by the continued improvement we are experiencing in collections rates on our cash basis tenants, which account for 15% of our total portfolio ABR.
As of March 31, we had collected 66.2 percent of 1st quarter build base rent from our cash basis tenants, which improved by 250 basis points to 68.7 percent as a result of cash collected subsequent to quarter end. And the trend has continued to improve in April, where we have now collected over 72% of April build base rent from our cash basis tenants. While there is still work to be done to return to full collection levels on this segment of our tenancy, we are making meaningful progress. As Jim highlighted in his remarks, we are also very encouraged by the strength of new leasing demand against the backdrop of significant rent commencements across the portfolio And moderate move out activity. Build occupancy in the Q1 was flat sequentially, beating the typical seasonal trend of declines early in the year.
During the quarter, we commenced over $9,000,000 of annualized ABR and added over $12,000,000 to the signed but not commenced pool. As a result, the spread between build and leased occupancy expanded to 300 basis points, representing over $40,000,000 of contractually obligated rent, of which approximately $28,000,000 is expected to come online ratably over the course of 2021. We have updated our 2021 FFO expectations to a range of $1.60 to $1.70 per share based on an improved same property NOI growth range of 1% to 3%. Our current expectations reflect our strong Q1 performance and the positive trends we are seeing across the portfolio, while also remaining appropriately Loss on debt extinguishment or any one time items. In addition, I would underscore that this range does not contemplate the conversion of any tenant To or from cash basis accounting during the remainder of the year, either of which could result in significant volatility in GAAP straight line rental income.
Turning to the balance sheet. During the Q1, we again accessed the unsecured bond market, raising $350,000,000 that was utilized to repay Our $350,000,000 unsecured term loan maturing in 2023. This transaction was opportunistic and consistent with our broader goal of Continuing to extend duration across the balance sheet. At quarter end, we had $1,600,000,000 of total liquidity, representing our undrawn 1 $25,000,000,000 revolving credit facility and over $370,000,000 of cash on hand. We have no debt maturities in 2021 and only 2 $1,000,000 of remaining maturities in 2022.
In conclusion, I'd like to thank the entire Brixmor team for another outstanding quarter that spotlights the extent of the portfolio and platform transformation that has occurred at the company over the last 5 years. Through your efforts, we successfully navigated And with that, I'll turn the call over to the operator for Q and A.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we will be conducting a question and answer Our first question comes from the line of Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, thanks. Good morning. First question around investments. It seems like the investment landscape is falling out a little bit. What should we Moving throughout the year in terms of deal flow and then in terms of pricing, it seems like there's been a greater appetite REITs and institutional capital looking for value add deals, how competitive is the landscape today?
Are you seeing that competition materialize for assets that you're looking at?
It's always competitive and we certainly see competition in some of the assets We're looking for today. We are encouraged by the breadth of opportunity that we're seeing. And Part of that is being driven by some of those very same institutional investors looking to reduce their exposure to retail. And from a value added perspective, we continue to see opportunities importantly to put our platform to work where we can leverage Our knowledge of tenant demand, our reinvestment and redevelopment capability to really drive IRR. So we're encouraged Todd, by what we see, but obviously we're not going to be providing estimates of what we expect to do until we actually get it done.
So, really encouraged by the closing on the center of Bonita Springs that we talked a little bit about in our That's certainly an asset that I think is emblematic of some of the opportunities that we're seeing in our core markets.
Okay. Angela, I think you commented that the guidance does contemplate additional transactions. Can you just elaborate on that a little bit? And then can you also touch on the cash balance? It's still north of 300,000,000 Do you expect to sit with an above average balance for an extended period of time or is that earmarked for something Specific, just curious if you could talk about the deployment of that cash and also what's embedded in the guidance from that standpoint?
Sure. In terms of the transaction activity contemplated in guidance, as is typical for us, we bake in some for additional activity as we move through the year, we'll update those as appropriate as time passes. At this point, When you consider the fact that we were a net seller in 2020, which has implications for 2021 and then our expectations for acquisition and disposition activity During 2021 itself, I would say the total dilution from both years is in the $0.04 to $0.06 range embedded within our guidance. And that contemplates, like I said, our current expectations of both amounts and potential timing. As it relates to the cash balance, I think about it this way.
We have effectively pre funded the 2022 maturity, which is early in 2022. We have repaid now our 2023 term loan. And so we'll continue to, as Jim sort of highlighted, look for opportunities In the market where we might be able to deploy some of that cash, but I would say the guidance range at this point contemplates that we do carry higher than average Cash balance for the remainder of the year.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you, Todd.
Our next question comes from the line of Alexander Goldfarb with Piper Sandler. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning. Good morning down there. So two questions. First, Angela, Just going to the credit side, clearly the narrative on retail has done a 180, right? I mean, we haven't read a depth of retail article Probably a year, curbside, the retailer feedback, customer feedback to Open Air has been clearly proven.
You guys have sort of in the penalty box from the accounting stuff of years ago, while your bonds trade much better than where your rating is. In your view, what are the latest conversations with the agencies? Are they still skittish on moving? Or do you think they'll finally recognize that The rating that you have now is not indicative of where your credit truly is.
Yes. Alex, I'd say if you go back kind of pre pandemic, we were on positive outlook from 2 of the 3 agencies that cover us. And I do think that was an acknowledgment of the progress that have been made on the balance Over those few preceding years and the fact that I think sort of objectively speaking the credit metrics here do line up with Some more of our more highly rated peers. So I think we were certainly on that path. I think that path was paused and we were moved to kind of Stable outlooks, at the beginning of the pandemic.
And I really believe that as we've continued to demonstrate and execute over the course of the last year, Our performance and the stability and resiliency of the cash flow stream here, really, I think speaks volumes about the quality of this portfolio and How the credit should be priced and how the credit should be rated. So I certainly won't speak for the rating agencies, but we're very hopeful that The execution over the last year can address any concerns specifically related to the pandemic and I think more than that Really highlight that overall stability and resiliency of this cash flow stream.
Okay. And then a question for Horgan. You guys made a pretty big acquisition. I think it's the first one in quite a number of years. So just curious, one, any comment around Cap rate or how you guys underwrote it, but bigger picture, how have your acquisition thoughts underwriting the assets that you target, how has it changed Now versus a few years ago, maybe it hasn't changed or maybe it has changed, but just curious.
Well, we really haven't changed our strategy. We've spent years looking at the assets we want to buy. We do have a target asset list. It is updated. It is organic, we haven't really changed why we want to buy assets.
It's really assets where we can drive value deleveraging our platform. So we're just seeing more of it today because the market is back We're seeing that there was a bit of a backlog through COVID of assets that want to come to markets. We really are seeing a wider range of opportunities today than we've In the last couple of years, from a cap rate perspective, I think Bonita is a great example and a great example of why we do have some advantages in the transactions We moved pretty quickly from agreeing to price to close because we're an all cash buyer, which is great from a cap rate perspective. It was a mid to high 6 cap rate. We think it underwrites to that high single digit, low double digit unlevered IRR.
So we really see a bunch of I want opportunity here. It's actually pretty clear. We've got a really highly productive grocer. It's actually in line with the production we see down in Naples, but in line occupancy, as Jim said, is around 60% versus high 90s down in Naples. So we really do see great value out there.
And Jim mentioned The anchor box where we're paying a little $2 per square foot and we think there's a 5 times rent spread there. So really excited about that one. We think we can find More opportunities like that as we go through time here.
So just to be clear, the mid to high 6s reflects that the in line occupancy is at 60%. So it's not really a stabilized cap rate. Correct. It's reflective of
Yes, in place in the line.
Okay, cool. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Craig Schmidt with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.
Thank you. I was wondering where you expect leasing value will be in 2021 versus 2020?
Significantly higher. One of the interesting things when you look at 2020 is we saw a pretty significant pause in the second Quarter as retailers, national retail or regional and local took a pause to assess the timing of their pipelines and How they were responding. But encouragingly, Craig, we actually saw a pickup in the 3rd quarter, albeit more weighted towards anchor type Transactions. Then in the Q4 and now in this Q1, we've seen very good volumes and good balance between anchor and small shop leasing. And as we look ahead, the strength of that forward leasing Pipeline is about as strong as it's been.
Brian, I don't know if you have other thoughts.
Yes. I would just add the new and renewal leasing volume, Craig, it's up 50% versus the height of the pandemic and ABR per Square Foot is at an all time high of close to $19 And so if you look at the productivity that we had during the Q1, it was in line with the quarter of 2019 where we had one of our most productive small shop years as a company. And Jim mentioned the pipeline of 2,200,000 square feet. That's up 15 versus the end of the year despite all those executions during the Q1. So we're very excited with the depth of the demand.
Again, it speaks to
the investments that we've made in our shopping
centers as we continue that we've made in our shopping centers as we continue to deliver those, we expect that activity to continue, but we're very encouraged by what we've seen at the start of the year.
Great. And then just I noted a number of your anchor retenitings include fitness centers.
Maybe can
you just tell how
you got comfortable with those retailers or that category?
Yes. One of the biggest surprises for us coming Through and out of the pandemic has been the strength of the fitness providers. Certainly, we saw some turbulence In the middle of 2020. But when we look at traffic levels and we talk to the fitness operators themselves and we look at their cash flows And their overall credit, we've been quite encouraged by the strength of return of the consumer to utilizing gyms And other fitness uses. So, we remain pretty bullish on that segment and Yes, continue to see a lot of demand from some very well capitalized operators.
Thanks.
Our next question comes from the line of Katie McConnell with Citigroup. Please proceed with your question.
Great. Thanks. Good morning. Could you provide some insight into the volume of acquisitions that you evaluated that screened out over the last quarter? And would you expect recent sector M and A to have a meaningful Action pricing for 1 off deals going forward?
Yes, it's
a great question. We screen a lot more assets than We transact on probably 4 times what we actually transact on at least. And the other thing Mark highlighted, Katie, which is important to appreciate is that we target assets move quickly as we did with Bonita Springs, which is a great example and also points to the Speed with which we were able to get that asset closed. And the real Interesting dynamic right now within the acquisition market is that assets that are smaller in size remain pretty liquid and we'd a lot of depth of competition, larger more complicated assets with more moving pieces. We see less competition.
So as we move forward, we do expect to see some compelling opportunities.
I'm a
little bit hesitant, Katie, to give you an estimate of what that pipeline might look like because We aren't going to report on it until we're actually closed, but we're encouraged by the level of activity that we're seeing.
And then I think you asked about read through from M and A to the property market. I think you'd be surprised that you really don't get a lot of like when we issue when we seek BOBs, Brokers not really point to M and A in the REIT space as far as asset values. They're really point to transactions and what's happening at the property market.
Okay, thanks. And then can you walk us through some of the key factors that are now assumed in the revised low end of your guidance range? And what is the range contemplated by cash basis tenant collection improvement?
I would say is it relates specifically to cash basis collections, which does remain kind of one of the key pieces within the range Between the low end and the top end of guidance range. I would say at the bottom end of the range, we've effectively assumed trends kind of in line with where they were In Q1 or towards the end of Q1, so really no significant improvement, additional improvement from this point going forward And no additional recoveries of prior reserved amount, at the low end. As you get into the top end of the range, We have embedded some additional occupancy upside and improving collections picture from cash basis tenants and or some modest Recoveries of prior period amounts. But importantly, you can certainly get to the top end of the range without any prior recoveries Of amounts that was reserved for in 2020 and without collections from cash basis tenants getting back to 100%. So that's kind of how I'd frame up the two ends of the range.
Okay, great. Thank you.
Thank you, Katy.
Our next question comes from the line of Paulina Rojas Schmidt with Green Street. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning. I'm curious, if you had to guess, how do you think market rents will evolve in the next Year or couple of years, given on the one hand how strong the economic recovery is shaping to be And on the other hand, the higher levels of vacancies in the market?
Well, we're encouraged by what we see is very broad based tenant And in fact, Pauline, we were hearing from several of our tenants, please show us your available space, your available boxes. So as we're Working through the opportunity that is vacancy, we're not wondering how we're going to backfill And we're in a position where we're able to generate some pretty healthy competition, which is one of the key drivers to Growth and underlying rent. One of the things as I highlighted in my remarks that I'm particularly encouraged by is that we're going into this Recovery with very attractive rent basis. So even if the recovery is more modest, we're still going to be making money. We're Still going to be driving growth.
We're still going to be finding opportunities to accretively reinvest in our assets. If the recovery continues as strong as it appears to be, that's really like a turbocharger for us because I think we'll see That inflation reading through into the underlying rents tenants are willing to pay and drive even better growth over the next couple of years.
And then more, let's say, philosophical question. We're seeing robust Listing volumes and what appears to be a broad based tenant demand for space. How do you reconcile this retailer for growth with the idea that there is too much retail GLA in the U. S. Do you think there is the risk that Some retailers are being maybe shortsighted and opening stores to take advantage of a recovery that could be short term in nature.
The retailers themselves have shown remarkable and ongoing discipline as it relates to new store openings And their ability to project what the sales will be served by a particular location given their access to data Has never been better. So they have a very informed view as to what a new unit will produce. And in our discussions and our coverage of
these national and regional
tenants, we're seeing that, Regional tenants, we're seeing that accuracy, if you will, and sales forecast Coming through. The other thing I'd say to you is, as it relates to the comment about GLA out there, there's really no New supply being created, and you do have obsolescence that occurs every year in the base Product out there that's of an institutional quality acceptable to the tenants who are opening stores in this environment. So we like how we're positioned to capitalize on those dynamics. And the other thing I would Say is remember, we're a segment of the overall retail space in the country. And I think what this pandemic has shown is the Growing breadth of demand for retailers that previously weren't in Open Air product to come into Open Air product.
Why? Because it's Convenience to the customer, it's got great access, great visibility and again importantly a reasonable cost of occupancy so that they can be Profitable, serving their customer with flexibility by the way to serve them in a multi channel format, whether it's in the Store fulfilled from the store, fulfilled at the curve, etcetera. Retailers are seeing the real power of coming into these community And neighborhood centers such as the ones that we are.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Ki Bin Kim with Chorus Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Thanks, John.
Good morning, guys.
How are you?
Good morning. Good. Hope you've been well.
Good.
So I wanted to talk about the lease activity that you guys have been posting and not just for you guys, but I guess for the industry too. But I'm curious, is the credit quality and the Hype of tenants composing that leasing activity or has it changed on the margin? Because I could imagine a scenario, right? You have a lot of inventory to lease out. And maybe this isn't the time to be so picky and choosy about what types of retailers come in.
So I can imagine a scenario where on the margin, Perhaps you or the industry can be leasing space to perhaps not the same type of credit quality as it was pre COVID?
We've actually been really encouraged by that trajectory in terms of the improvement of the quality of the tenants. And Brian, maybe you can talk a little bit about The types of tenants that we're seeing big demand from and that improvement in quality.
Yes, sure. Jim, you're spot on in terms of the depth And the credit quality, just the overall quality of the tenant base that we've been doing deals with. And Jim touched on a number of the categories, Ki Bin. When you look at specialty grocery, which has been one of the most active categories that we have, we signed 3 more grocery leases during the quarter. We have another 15 grocery leases either at lease or final LOI and that's across a broad range of segments in the traditional ethnic and specialty And all the very strong operators and as we look at value apparel, health and beauty, pet stores, general merchandise and home, These are very strong tenants that we continue to attract to our shopping centers.
I know you've highlighted the outparcel demand in the past. That's another one of our most active categories. During the quarter, we signed leases with Starbucks, Chipotle and Chick Fil A, and we have a depth of demand with them as well. So We've really been pleased. And to your point about the mom and pop or local tenants, we're seeing entrepreneurs, Strong operators, multiple unit operators that are seeing an opportunity here with some businesses that may have failed during the So we're actually improving the credit quality for a number of those tenants that are coming in and say 2nd generation restaurant space or hair salons and nail salons.
So Overall, we've been extremely pleased with the depth of quality of our tenancy.
Okay, great. And a question for Angela. The $40,000,000 of signed but not commenced leases, I was just wondering if you can provide some more color around because one comment question I get is, No. Does that really become additive or is it replacing in place tenants that are paying rent when they expire? Is it just staying on the treadmill at the same speed.
So I was wondering if you provide some commentary around that?
Yes. Almost all of it's really truly additive. First of all, I guess I'd start by saying that nobody who's currently There's a tenant that's currently paying today. You don't get to be counted in both kind of the build and lease side. So they don't we don't show them in that $40,000,000 Until the existing tenant has left and it's truly additive.
When you think about kind of how that $40,000,000 might relative to just the broader lease expiration schedule, I would say based on kind of historical retention rates, I would expect something like 80% of it to truly be additive relative to just how the normal course of move outs kind of trend. So It really is a significant tailwind for us from a growth perspective as we move forward. I think if you look at the year over year occupancy decline we had throughout the pandemic, which was I think 130 basis points on build occupancy. A significant reason for that was the fact that we went into the pandemic with such A large sign but not commenced pool and we continue to commence leases throughout the course of 2020 In the Q1 of 2021. So it's certainly you've seen it, I think, relative to other into the broader industry in terms of what's happened occupancy over the last year, just how additive that really can be.
Yes, Ki Bin, I would also just highlight that We've talked about our signed but not commenced for several quarters and we've delivered that growth for several quarters, Right. We've delivered that outperformance in part because of the continued demand in that forward pipeline.
Thank you again.
You bet.
Our next question comes from the line of Derek Johnston with Deutsche Bank, please proceed with your question.
Hi, everybody. Thinking pre COVID to now, How has leasing contracts evolved or what stipulations are now included or omitted that was normal practice Before the shutdown, are you doing more or less percentage rents? And how have your omnichannel requirements or perhaps BOPIS asks from tenants, evolved.
Great. Do you want to handle that, Brian?
Yes, sure. I'll take it. Derek, what's been interesting to us as we look at our leases is Many of the things that we're focused on in terms of embedded rent growth, sales reporting, conversion of tenants to recapture more from a CAM We've still been able to achieve that. In fact, our embedded rent growth over the course of our leases was in 2020 was the best Since 2017, we don't have a tremendous amount of percentage run only leases. I think we might have done a handful over the past year.
And as it relates to omni channel, we had spoken on prior calls for years talking about how accommodating we were being With our grocers in terms of rolling out click and collect. And Jim talked about just the flexibility of our format. We've been able to do that with a number of We've been able to accommodate a number of national tenants from a curbside pickup perspective. And it really speaks to the platform where We're able to go to those tenants through our relationships, create one agreement and get those deployed very quickly. We saw that during the Q3, we wanted to have as many of those pickup spaces in place, for the holidays for our tenants.
So that's been that's certainly been a focus of ours. And when we talk to our tenants, Their number one asset is their stores. And everything they're doing around it, whether it's shipping from stores or whether it's curbside pickup, It's to drive more traffic to the store. So what we're seeing with a number of these initial these initiatives is just more trips that otherwise would have been here. But From a lease contract perspective, we've been very encouraged by what we've been able to continue to negotiate with our tenants.
Yes, I would say the quality of those leases continues Certainly, some tenants were looking for future type relief and we were able to strike the right balance there
and continue to make
sure that our leases remain in
Okay. Thank you. And then secondly, with leasing demand so strong, How patient are you planning to be with your cash basis tenants in both buckets? I mean, those that are paying and especially those that are challenged. I mean, it seems that it's sticking with these tenants may be somewhat of an opportunity cost versus taking space back and releasing given the demand backdrop.
Can you please weigh
in? Yes. We've tried to approach this on a tenant by tenant basis, Looking at their productivity prior to the pandemic, what impact the pandemic has had on their business and importantly, how they're emerging. And we've worked with these tenants where we think it's appropriate to help them get to the other side. And I think that's been a very Positive approach as we've seen our outperformance now coming into the recovery.
But certainly for tenants that have not engaged with us or who continue to Struggle, we're being more and more assertive as it relates to resolving their occupancy and back rent. So It's difficult to generalize, but that's the approach that we've taken is really tenant by tenant. We're not trying to make High level decisions when really it's what's happening at the real estate level at the center that determines how we're going to approach that
Our next question comes from the line of Greg McGinnis with Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question.
Hey, good morning. It was encouraging to see the stabilized occupancy this quarter and especially the increase on the shop leasing side. Saying that you've turned the corner on declining occupancy and you can start to build from here or there's still some pockets of tenant risk to navigate? And if so, in what categories might you still see some elevated risk?
We're very encouraged by what we're seeing generally within the small shop segment The portfolio and as Brian alluded to earlier, the strength of some of these operators that they've shown through the pandemic and frankly the Strength of demand that we're seeing for some of the 2nd generation states that we've recaptured. Could there be a quarter or 2 where you see some volatility? Certainly. But I think most Importantly, we're seeing great momentum and great demand out of these small shop tenants, Really in all categories, national, regional and local. And really in the last quarter and a half, we've been very pleased with the As they position themselves for the recovery.
Was there ever a Shift in market rents for those mom and pops and as the economy starts to open up more and people are shopping, could we potentially start to see Rent spreads expand from here?
I think that the way this recovery is setting up is a strong Positive for the direction of where rents go. And I think we're particularly well positioned to benefit from that. And it really outperformed whether it's a modest recovery or a strong recovery. I like how we're positioned. The pandemic itself didn't have direct impacts on Market rents are the impacts were probably too transitory to talk about.
We're seeing good recovery in demand and importantly, we're creating competition for the space that we're leasing, which helps us push rents
Great, thanks. If I could just sneak in one more here, just to touch on cash basis tenants. If you knew in Q2 and Q3 of last year what you know now about how your tenants are doing, how much that have impacted your To shift those tenants to a cash basis. I'm trying to get a sense for maybe the un accrued rent that you may now reasonably expect to collect without Physically asking for that number.
Angela, I'll let you handle that one.
Yes. Look, I mean, I think we made the right decisions at each point in the process, Given the amount of uncertainty, given what we are seeing at different periods of time, from a collection standpoint and Category exposure and a host of other considerations we took into account when we moved tenants to cash basis. We always knew given sort of the unique dynamics of a pandemic that of a pandemic that to the extent we got through to recovery, there were going to be tenants that would likely be moved back to accrual at some point. And I do think that's certainly a possibility as we get further into the recovery later in the year. We haven't moved anybody back to accrual yet, But we're watching a number of tenants where their businesses or categories have significantly improved.
Maybe they've had a recapitalization event, something like that, And we'll continue to monitor that. But I think I really think we went through a very robust process in each quarter of the pandemic and I think we made the right calls based on the information we had at each of those points in time and we'll continue to evaluate it As we move into the Q2 and then the second half of this year.
All right. Thanks, Angela. Thank you, Jim.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Juan Cimabria with BMO. Please proceed with your question. Hi, good morning and thanks for your time. Just a question on cap rates, given all the redevelopments And what's in the pipeline, where do you see stabilized cap rates for high quality shopping center backed assets and power centers?
Mark? Hey, it's Mark. We're seeing trades for stabilized gross Trading into the low fives at this point, low to mid fives and a lot of it is dependent on scale when they're really just that Grocery anchored asset with some small shop, you get some pretty tight cap rates and really strong demand from local buyers who are putting some cheap debt on those assets. What's interesting and what we're seeing in the market real time is a bit of a thawing on the power center more boxy side of the market. Some of the assets we've been Looking to transact on the liquidity we're seeing is allowing us to exit some assets, I think, at some pretty opportunistic pricing.
So you're starting to see some of those cap rates Saw and come back in line with what you were seeing pre pandemic.
I would say one of the other interesting characteristics about environment is that because the marginal buyer typically is utilizing leverage in particular asset level bank financing, That buyer is not able to put the same type of value on vacancy that we might given our visibility on how we're going to lease that And drive returns. So in that way, you're seeing a nice environment for integrated platforms Such as ourselves to capitalize on real value add opportunities.
Thanks. And then just a quick follow-up. Has the increase in raw material costs, labor, steel or what have you impacted expected redevelopment yields. I noticed kind of the most recent additions being a bit below what's Already in the pipeline. I'm not sure if that's specific to those opportunities or being impacted by what we're seeing on the cost side.
We're watching it carefully. Fortunately, most of what we have in the pipeline has been pre committed, pre bought and is Under GMAX type contracts. So we're somewhat hedged there in terms of what we have underway, but we're watching it. And Just on the issues of cost, but also the issues of availability of product, whether it's steel or lumber, Certain other equipment that we use in our redevelopment pipeline. Difficult to point to what its impact might The on future returns, because we're also seeing some nice demand and growth in terms So we're watching it closely.
I think at least in the near term, the thing we're most focused Don, it's just timing, making sure that we continue to hit our timing and our days.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Caitlin Burrows with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, good morning. Good morning. Maybe just as a follow-up to the one of the prior questions on leasing spreads and pricing. Jim, you talked in the beginning even about how high leasing spreads have historically been a differentiator for Brixmor, but it does look like that spread on like a trailing 12 month basis has Come in somewhat on overall leasing and new leases. So I was just wondering if you could talk through that to what extent have those mark to markets been impacted By the pandemic or do you expect the spreads to pick back up or is this how you were always expecting that the trend would play out?
Well, there is no doubt that if you look at on a trailing 12 basis, you really are picking up the height of the impact of the pandemic And it did have some drag. What I'm particularly encouraged by is we're seeing those spreads, whether they be new leases or renewals, Continue to accelerate into sort of that longer term trajectory that we've been delivering over the last 4 to 5 years. And given the quality of what we're In the pipeline, I think we feel pretty good about where the spreads will be on a rolling forward basis. You may see a quarter or 2 of volatility here and there, but we're particularly pleased with what we're Seeing in the forward pipeline, both with respect to new and renewal deals.
Okay. And then just back to the redevelopments. You have a long list of current and future opportunities. I was wondering If you could go through to what extent the pandemic has changed this pipeline of projects at all or not? For example, have you changed any projects, Return expectations are different target tenants or what do you think will work now versus before or has there been any change to many of those plans?
One of the things that we've been most encouraged by through the pandemic is the beneficial impact it's had on grocers In terms of their cash flows, their willingness to invest in their existing stores as well as their willingness and capacity to invest in new stores. So I would say that, against the backdrop of both the pandemic and importantly underlying food price inflation, We've been particularly encouraged by the depth and breadth of grocery demand. Also though, we're seeing great demand from Some of our other core categories of tenants in value apparel, general merchandise, fitness, services, etcetera. And if anything, as we come into this recovery, we're even more encouraged by what we see in that forward Shadow pipeline, if you will, that we talk about in the supplement. And you can see every quarter we continue to add new projects to the Pipeline that's underway while we're also delivering.
So this past quarter, for example, I believe we added $25,000,000 or 35,000,000 New projects, while we were also delivering $27,000,000 or $28,000,000 So that constant refreshment of the In deliveries, importantly, I talk about this a lot, but you see us delivering real time and That's one of the benefits of the granularity of what we're doing. We're not taking long lead risk. The projects themselves are substantially pre leased. We have the costs in hand before we commit. So that makes what we're doing from a reinvestment perspective, I think particularly attractive both Through the pandemic, but also as we recover and can benefit from where market rents are going versus Longer term, more complicated projects that may have been priced into a different environment.
Got it. Okay, thanks.
You bet.
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Mueller with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning, Mike.
Yes. Hey, good morning. So going back to the prior question on cap rates, are you seeing any differences? I know you mentioned low fives For grocery anchored, but when you think about different markets, say, like the major coastal markets versus Sunbelt and other areas, I mean, how are you seeing the cap
Yes, you do certainly see some cap rate variance By market, but again, I think a lot of the cap rate is driven by what that future forward cash flow looks like. So you do see assets where you see strong growth, people are definitely leaning into cap rate a bit. I'd say where you see a bit wider cap rates are markets like Some of the Midwest markets generally have traded a bit wider than some of the coastal markets. We're seeing one of the things I think we have seen in the past 2 years, if you kind of think through pre COVID, what we're seeing today is that, that spread between tertiary cap rates for gross to be anchored and coastal cap rates appeared to be We're seeing some positive momentum there. But yes, you certainly see some cap rate difference across different markets.
A market like Southern California always trades very tight. So I guess that's how I try to answer your question.
Got it. Okay. And then, just thinking about physical occupancy, I mean, do you have a sense as to where, just
wide range and sort of embedded in our expectations for the course of this calendar year. We're still at a 200 basis point Spread in the same property NOI guidance. We're certainly very encouraged by what we saw in the Q1 and in particular, build occupancy The remaining flat on a sequential basis, as I mentioned in my remarks, it's pretty unusual to see that in the Q1. So that was certainly positive indicator and we do have that $40,000,000 of signed but not commenced to continue to provide support and hopefully growth as we move through the year. But there are, as we talked about in previous questions, parts of the tenancy we continue to watch closely and watch how Strong or how robust the recovery is in certain categories.
So I think it's too early to say, but there are certainly some pretty positive indicators based on how the Q1
Got it. Okay. That was it. Thank you.
Thank you, Mike.
Our next question comes from the line of Tamy Fike with Wells Fargo Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning, Tammy. Good morning. Maybe just
a question for Angela. Wondering how we should be thinking about the quarterly FFO throughout the year, Given kind of the implied drop off in guidance from the $0.45 comparable FFO reported in the Q1 and I guess what seems like Really improving and positive and all the positive indicators that you guys are discussing today.
Yes. I mean, I think there are kind of 2 factors to think about in terms How it trends from here. Sequentially, the first is sort of the impact of potential transaction activity, Which I mentioned earlier, the 2020 activity, 2021 activity should cost us a total of $0.04 to $0.06 on a year over year basis. You're not seeing all of that impact yet in the first Quarter. So that's one factor, but the biggest factor is really just revenues deemed uncollectible.
We did and it's highlighted for you, I think on Page 11 of our supplemental package pretty well. 1st quarter definitely benefited from a significant amount of cash collected from amounts that we did Reserve 4 in 2020. It was about $7,600,000 just on the base rent piece. There was probably another $1,000,000 or $1,200,000 of recoveries as well that we collected in the Q1. As I mentioned in my commentary, our guidance, particularly at the low end of the range doesn't assume that we'd collect any additional amounts that we had preserved last So that's probably the biggest factor in terms of how to think about as we move through the year and what that might look like.
Okay, great. Thanks. That's really helpful. And then maybe just one question. Are you seeing any Notable differences in demand kind of based upon geography, particularly given the migration trends that have been accelerated or would you say demand is Generally strong across the entire portfolio.
Brian?
Yes. I'd say certainly in our South region, we've seen A significant amount of demand, but what we've been encouraged by, it's been fairly broad based. The Northeast last year For much of the year, the height of the pandemic was having a stronger year as they were having in 2019. We did see in the Q4 and early this year In California, with the restrictions still in place and the level of those restrictions, a little bit tepid demand, but That's really picked up is what's been interesting over the entire period is, as these restrictions are lifted, we're often seeing tenants come back to the table. So it's been fairly broad based.
We are seeing a Significant amount in the South, but we've been encouraged by what we've been seeing across the portfolio.
Great. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Floris Van Dischamps with Compass Point. Please proceed with your question.
Thanks for taking my question, guys.
Good morning. Good morning.
Good morning.
Look for you, just maybe if you can comment on bad debt and also generally What are your expectations later on this year, presuming that all of your tenants at WatchGuard are on a cash basis as well? What are you assuming going forward?
Yes. I would say at the low end of the range, we're assuming that cash basis tenant collections look pretty similar to the way they look towards the end of the Q1, kind In the high 60% range, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks. So that's kind of our expectations at the low end of the range. I would say the low end of the range Also doesn't contemplate any additional recoveries of amounts that we reserved in 2020. And I think Page 11 of the supplemental does a good job at breaking out specifically how much we reserved in Q1, Just related to Q1 build based rent based on what was a lower cash collection number, kind of more in the mid-60s and the high-60s.
So we are assuming some incremental improvement, but again at the low end of the range, no recoveries of previously reserved amount. The higher end of the range, we certainly assume that cash basis collections improve. So as I mentioned earlier, we can get to the top end of the range without needing cash basis Collections to recover entirely. So we don't need to see 100% collections from cash basis tenants to achieve that higher end of the range.
Right. And then again, the range does not include any of the recapture of previous uncollected rents. Maybe my other question is to Jim. Jim, as you think about allocating capital And one of your peers just bought another one of your peers at a, call it, a mid-five cap rate. What does that make you think about your appetite to do deals when you've got, Call it $280,000,000 right now of redevelopments at call it 9 caps And a $1,000,000,000 pipeline, presumably something similar.
How do you think about bigger deals versus Just the slow but steady improvement in your own portfolio?
I'm encouraged by what we're seeing in the environment today in terms of not only the continued growth in our own reinvestment line and the yields that I think are as you highlight pretty compelling. We are seeing some external growth opportunities out there At the asset level, where for us, I think we have a great opportunity to bring our fully integrated platform to to bear and drive value and drive some pretty nice IRRs. As Mark alluded The Bonita Springs acquisition, I think is a great example of that, where we're coming in at a Pretty reasonable cap rate in the mid to upper 6s on an asset that's got significant vacancy and rents that are below market. We're able to assess What the national, regional and local tenant demand is to be at that center and underwrite returns without having to stretch much that are in the high low double digit from an IRR perspective. And I think again in this environment, The marginal buyer and the buyer that we tend to compete with is going to be somebody relying on leverage who's Less able given their capital stack and their capital source to give value for vacancy or to underwrite how to address that vacancy.
So, I'm excited by what we see both within our portfolio in terms of reinvestment opportunities, but also what we see from an external growth perspective as we capital recycle and As we identify assets in our core markets.
Thanks, Jim.
You bet.
There are no further questions in the queue. I'd like to hand the call back over to Stacy Slater for closing remarks.
Thanks, everyone, for joining us today.
Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day.