Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the CACI International Fiscal 2022 Q2 Results. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will announce the opportunity for questions, and instructions will be given at that time. If you should need any assistance during this call, please press Star, then zero, and someone will help you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference call over to Dan Leckburg, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for CACI International. Please go ahead.
Thanks, Andrea, and good morning, everyone. I'm Dan Leckburg, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for CACI. Thank you for joining us this morning. We are providing presentation slides, so let's move to slide number two, please. There will be statements in this call that do not address historical fact, and as such, constitute forward-looking statements under current law. These statements reflect our views as of today and are subject to important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated. Those factors are listed at the bottom of last night's press release and are described in the company's SEC filings. Our safe harbor statement is included on this exhibit and should be incorporated as part of any transcript of this call. I would also like to point out that our presentation will include discussion of non-GAAP financial measures.
These should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Let's turn to slide three, please. To open our discussion this morning, I'll turn the call over to John Mengucci, President and Chief Executive Officer of CACI International. John.
Thanks, Dan, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss our Q2 2022 results. With me this morning is Tom Mutryn, our Chief Financial Officer. Slide four, please. Our Q2 results represent solid financial performance, though candidly, we're slightly below our expectations. Organic growth was about 1%, reflecting some near-term dynamics we saw developed during the quarter, which I'll speak to shortly. Technology growth of 9% continues to be strong, and profitability was healthy with adjusted EBITDA margins of 10.6%. We generated robust cash flow, and we won $2 billion of contract awards, representing a book-to-bill of 1.3 times for the quarter and 1.6 times on a trailing 12-month basis. Slide five, please.
That said, we did see some headwinds develop as the Q2 progressed, and I categorize these dynamics in a few ways. First, in the last few months, we began to see an unprecedented increase in COVID cases. Many customers responded by stopping in-person meetings and reducing the number of people allowed inside their facilities. This has limited customer engagement and, in some cases, slowed the ramp-up of new work. Second, customer access and bandwidth, which was already a challenge, has been exacerbated by the increase in COVID cases. To be clear, this has not materially impacted RFPs and contract awards, demonstrated by another strong quarter of awards. Rather, it is a slower pace of the underlying contracting and tasking activity required to ramp, deliver, or recognize our associated revenue. In particular, we're seeing this in some of our technology sales that rely on close customer interaction.
Again, it's not a demand issue. This is all about customer capacity and access. The supply chain also remains a challenge. While we ordered ahead of need where we could, availability of key components is still tough. Again, this is not a demand issue. Factoring these dynamics into our outlook for the H2, we are modestly reducing our expectations for organic growth and EBITDA margin for fiscal year 2022, and Tom will provide more details shortly. It's important to note that we view these recent dynamics as short-term. They do not change our customers' critical needs or the challenges arising from the heightened global threat environment.
The simple reality is we have a healthy and robust addressable market with plenty of opportunity to continue winning business, growing organically, expanding margins, deploying capital for additional value, and growing free cash flow per share to drive long-term shareholder value, all of which we are delivering on today. Slide 6, please. In addition to strong overall contract awards, Q2 was another quarter with healthy classified awards and nearly $600 million. This demonstrates continued leadership in our sweet spots of cyber, the electromagnetic spectrum, and software-defined technologies. As an example, we won new work from an intelligence customer leveraging the capabilities and customer relationships of LGS and Next Century, providing another great example of how our strategic M&A positions CACI to win new, high-valued work and take market share.
Other classified awards this quarter include a multi-hundred million dollar sole source renewal, several new business wins, and expansions of existing work. We also continue to see good demand signals for broad network and digital applications modernization. The pandemic has accelerated this need, including requirements for secure remote work capabilities and cloud migration. With expanded access, excuse me, additional cybersecurity requirements are a necessity. We are demonstrating to customers that modernization is not only achievable but also yields significant benefits. In addition, we are seeing a new generation of government leaders that expect and understand the benefits of modern technology. Recent examples include our $514 million award to modernize network infrastructure for the Army and new and expanded work for DHS, including CISA.
Let's turn to slide seven, please. Strong cash flow and overall financial strength, we continue to have flexibility and optionality to deploy capital to drive long-term value for our shareholders. As we have discussed, our focus is on driving growth of free cash flow per share. In addition to organic growth and margin expansion, we generate this through share repurchases like our $500 million ASR last year, and over the longer term, through our organic investments and strategic M&A. On the M&A front, we acquired two additional technology companies during the Q2, both of which enhance CACI's long-term growth prospects and address technology demands in the near and long term. First, we acquired SA Photonics, a leader in the development and deployment of multi-domain photonics technologies for free space optical communications or laser comms.
As we have previously discussed, photonics is already an area of internal investment that is producing compelling results, including awards from NASA, multiple prime contractors and classified customers. We see significant long-term growth potential for advanced photonics technology, driven by the increasing adoption of low-Earth orbit or LEO satellite constellations, as well as the demand for faster and more secure communications capabilities. SA Photonics complements our existing photonics business in several ways. They expand our LEO capabilities, adding laser communications for airborne and maritime platforms. They add additional manufacturing capacity, and they expand our customer and contract footprint. The combination of SA Photonics and CACI's existing business creates the leading U.S.-based provider of photonics technology. Second, we announced last night the recent acquisition of ID Technologies or IDT.
IDT started as a value-added reseller and several years ago recognized the growing need for secure remote access by DoD and intelligence community customers. To fulfill this requirement, they invested internally and developed a software-enabled offering that allows out-of-the-box commercial devices to securely access classified networks. IDT's software-enabled end user devices, coupled with CACI's network modernization capabilities and contracts, provide long-term growth and margin expansion opportunities. To the employees of SA Photonics and ID Technologies, I welcome you again to CACI and look forward to the successes we'll achieve together. Before I turn it over to Tom, our long-term market trends remain positive. We continue to see bipartisan support for national security spending and investment. CACI's capabilities are very well aligned with our government's focus on broad modernization, national security challenges, which depend on technology, speed, and flexibility to deal with both great power competition and counterterrorism.
We will continue to execute our strategy that focuses on well-funded priorities with plenty of opportunities for CACI to drive consistent long-term growth, margin expansion, free cash flow per share, and shareholder value. With that, I'll turn it over to Tom.
Thank you, John, and good morning, everyone. Please turn to slide 8. We generated revenue of $1.5 billion in the Q2, representing 1.2% growth with around 1% organic growth. This included strong growth in technology revenue, which grew around 9% from a year ago. This was partially offset by lower expertise revenue, primarily reflecting the impact of the Afghanistan withdrawal. Q2 adjusted EBITDA margins was 10.6% and adjusted diluted earnings per share was $4.39, both down from last year, given last year's benefit from higher profitability due to favorable fixed-price contract performance and lower indirect costs under COVID. Slide 9, please. Q2 free cash flow was $117 million, excluding our accounts receivable purchase facility.
Adjusting for the cash impacts of the CARES Act, free cash flow was up $11 million or 7% from last year. This reflects healthy profitability and continued efficient cash collections. We closed the Q2 with net debt to trailing twelve-month adjusted EBITDA at 3.1 times after our two latest acquisitions. As we've demonstrated in the past, our strong cash flow allows us to quickly deliver, creating flexibility and optionality as we consider all capital deployment opportunities. In addition, during the Q2, we extended the term of our credit facility to 2026, secured more favorable pricing, and improved other terms. We increased the size of the facility by $900 million and currently have over $1.1 billion of available capacity. Slide 10, please. As John mentioned, we acquired two companies during the Q2.
We invested a total of $500 million for these two businesses. For fiscal year 2022, we expect SA Photonics to contribute around $25 million of revenue, and IDT to contribute $95 million for a total of $120 million. These acquisitions are expected to be accretive to adjusted earnings per share over the next 12 months. Both businesses are in the early stages of their respective growth curves and are investing to position themselves to capture significant opportunities. This is consistent with our strategy to invest ahead of customer need and will position CACI to capture additional share in high value, high priority areas of our addressable market. Slide 11, please. We are raising our fiscal year 2022 guidance to reflect the two acquisitions as well as the near-term impacts John discussed, which are expected to persist in the H2.
We now expect revenue to be between $6.3 billion and $6.4 billion, with total revenue growth of 5% and organic growth of around 2.5% at the midpoint of guidance. We expect our full-year EBITDA margin to be around 10.7% at the midpoint, reflecting delays in the sales of some higher-margin technology in the investments being made by our two most recent acquisitions. As noted, SA Photonics and IDT are currently making investments to support future growth, and these investments reduce our expected fiscal year 2022 EBITDA margins by around 10 basis points. Accounting for these investments, our expected margins would have been 10.8% above last year, even with the headwinds we already mentioned. For modeling purposes, we now expect fiscal year 2022 depreciation and amortization to be around $142 million.
We expect our fully diluted share count to be 23.7 million shares. Our other assumptions remain materially unchanged, including free cash flow of at least $720 million. It's worth noting we have already realized $190 million of the expected $230 million cash benefit from the 2021 method change, virtually all of which was subsequent to the Q2. Lastly, we are on track to deliver strong free cash flow per share. Our historical and expected free cash flow per share performance reflects growth margin expansion in the recent ASR, which reduced share counts by close to 2 million shares. Slide 12, please. Turning to our forward indicators, we expect 92% of our fiscal 2022 revenue to come from existing programs, 4% from recompetes and around 3% from new business.
We have $7 billion of submitted bids under evaluation, with around 80% of that for new business to CACI. We expect to submit another $16.7 billion over the next 2 quarters, with over 80% of that for new business to CACI. With that, I'll turn the call back over to John.
Thank you, Tom. Let's go to slide 13. CACI continues to deliver strong organic growth, strong profitability and robust cash flow. The recent resurgence of COVID has created some near-term challenges, but these dynamics do not change our significant longer-term growth opportunities. We purposely aligned our business with critical national security and broad modernization priorities, and are executing our strategy of investing ahead of customer need, both organically and inorganically in differentiated technologies. These capabilities continue to enable CACI to win new work in the marketplace and bring value to our customers. They also underpin our commitment to deliver growth ahead of our addressable market, margin expansion, robust cash flow and ultimately free cash flow per share growth with the goal to drive long-term shareholder value.
Finally, to our diverse and talented people, I'm immensely proud of you and your commitment to our customers, your shareholders, and each other every single day. Your dedication, talent, good character, and spirit of innovation is truly foundational to our success. With that, Andrea, let's open the call for questions.
We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the key. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you have further questions, you may re-enter the question queue. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question will come from Tobey Sommer of Truist. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much. Your bid activity on new work to CACI is impressive. How do bids look if you dig into it in that category and look at it from a perspective of takeaways of programs that are out there but would be new to the company versus sort of new work? Thanks.
Yes. Tobey, this is Tom. The majority of that is takeaway from existing, you know, customers. You know, as you know, the average cycle is either 3 or 5 years. We are kind of going after other people's incumbencies or going after our incumbency. You know, we do a good job of winning our recompetes, you know, typically over 90% on a kind of annualized kind of basis. You know, as we get into new areas, electronic warfare or cyber, there are some new work. John.
Yeah. Tobey, also, if you look at the acquisitions that we discussed today, that is a great example of new work, right? With this burgeoning space market, with the billions of additional dollars that are going to be spent to provide more protected and secure comms at much higher bandwidth, those are all new programs, right? As you look at where SDA is going with their Tranche 0 and their Tranche 1, as you look at the intelligence community building out CSfC solutions, which is the technology focus area that we have with IDT. Both of those areas are all gonna be new work.
We'll be in the thick of that and, you know, frankly, I like the capabilities and those two acquisitions that we'll be coming to market with.
Thank you. My follow-up question has to do with the continuing resolution. Could you discuss how the market and customers are responding to this CR versus recent experiences? I know we have a lot of them in the last decade or so, as well as comment on what your sorta house view is on when and if we get a budget, as well as whether your assumption and guidance is for a CR to extend for the rest of your fiscal year. Thanks.
Yeah, Tobey, terrific question. Look, yeah, we have probably been under a CR for you know, 1 to 365 days. I don't know, maybe it's the last you know, 30 to 35 years, less a couple. It's true, and as we mentioned during our you know, guidance call, we've got a lot of experience operating under a CR. But what's different about this one is it's a CR with a resurgence of COVID, with priorities in the middle of changing, with customers who have 25% of their buildings full, with contracting officers who are not in their office because of those warnings and because of COVID. This sort of makes it a little different one.
What we've seen is, you know, during a traditional CR at the very basic building blocks, customers get one-twelfth of their funding each month, just to make it simple, and that's based on last year's budget. We are seeing people struggling with getting funding orders out, and as Tom mentioned during his earlier remarks, that's predominantly what's creating this short-term headwind for us is not getting funding out there for the multiple of task orders that we need to continue to drive revenue in this business. It doesn't mean that revenue is lost. It just means that it's somewhat disrupted by that.
You know, back on the fuller view of the CR, you know, we've put a guidance out there that is less about where the CR goes, but more about when things return to a more normal situation. You know, at the low end, we would be looking at, you know, COVID continues to wreak havoc, buildings stay at 25% filled, and, you know, funding orders continue at a slow pace or get worse. On the higher end, you know, CRs clear, funding shows back up, people start returning in full style, and we're able to get, you know, task orders sooner to after we win something versus longer term. Thank you for those questions, Tobey.
The next question comes from Matt Akers of Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thanks for the question. Good morning. Could you talk about just sort of hiring headcount trends? It looks like your headcount, based on the number in the release was down a little bit, even though, you know, you've closed on some deals. Was there increased turnover that you saw at all or is there any comments you could give about, around headcount?
Sure, Matt. Thanks. Look, hiring and, you know, we've been talking about this for quite some time. The demand for talent is gonna continue to remain high. It remains competitive and challenging, but again, as I've mentioned, that's really been no different than it has been over the past several years. You know, when we look at STEM and we look at engineering, software graduates and the like, you know, we put a number of programs in place I talked about last quarter. We continue to expand our internship program, and we continue to invest ahead of need, even internally, where we've invested in locations across the country with the technology infrastructure so we could better support an even broader dispersed workforce.
Of course, the true test of that was when we entered into COVID. We had many of our own employees working from very remote locations. You know, we continue to recruit from within. We continue to provide professional development skills, flexibility. We've enhanced our benefits numerous times. But you know, at the end of the day, what we're doing is not by accident. It's just been a long-term focus of ours that the absolute value of our employees as we moved more into the technology realm, it became much more pressing on us to make certain that we had the right fungible workforce so we can move from project to project.
You know, the other thing that we've done, and it's worked out extremely well, is coming into fiscal year 2022, knowing some of the headwinds, but clearly not all of them, we expanded our bonus program to include an additional 500 folks in our overall bonus program and added 250 people to our long-term stock incentive plan. That has been a great addition to what we're doing across this company. You know, net-net talent is very, very tough to find, but the portfolio that we have also changes some of our hiring numbers. Let me just spend a minute on that as well. You know, the more we move towards technology solutions and the more we offer less expertise, you know, that expertise world is hiring person for person.
The government asks for X number of people, we have to hire X number of people. On the technology side, we get to make the choice as to how we want to deploy people. As we go, you know, more towards higher margin cost plus and firm fixed price development work, you know, the higher level of talent we bring in, the more cost-effective we're able to be, and actually the less people we need to hire because we're not filling billets. We're actually, you know, hiring talent around the kind of technology work that we're going after.
Great. That's really helpful. I guess as a follow-up, could you talk about how you're thinking about the mix of M&A versus repurchase at this point? I mean, your stock is really cheap. You know, what are you seeing for valuations in the M&A market, and how do you think about that balance?
Yeah. Look, you know, it's probably the most asked question, and something frankly that Tom and I and others in the board spend an awful lot of time on, and that's, you know, capital deployment. And, you know, some of those trade-offs. You know, I'm very proud to continue to say that, you know, our capital deployment strategy is going to be opportunistic and flexible, and "and" remains the key word. We've done a lot of internal investments between IRAD and customer billable R&D and better proposal, where we're investing ahead of need around $100 million a year to date. That continues to grow.
You know, in the past year, you've seen us execute a $500 million ASR and make 4 acquisitions in the first 2 quarters of this year. M&A remains an important use of our capital, but it's not the only one. Our $500 million ASR last year was a great example. You know, what were the terms that we looked at? Stock valuation was very attractive relative to our performance. The M&A pipeline was not robust in the near term, so we did the ASR. You know, we are actually living what we talked about, which is an opportunistic and flexible model that does look at share repurchases and M&A and a number of other investments.
Yeah. Again, let me add or cut in that. With the four acquisitions John mentioned, plus the ASR, we deployed around $1.1 billion of capital, approximately 50% share repurchase, 50%, you know, technology acquisitions, filling gaps. With that kind of leverage at 3.1 times, still a very comfortable, kind of, in our minds, modest level of leverage. I mentioned that we received some sizable tax refunds, you know, since January first. With those additional tax refunds, which we're expecting came a little bit earlier than we anticipated, we're probably leveraged at 2.8 times today. A lot of flexibility to redeploy capital appropriately using the criteria John articulated.
The next question comes from Gavin Parsons of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning.
Good morning, Gavin.
Following up maybe just a little bit on Tobey's timing question. I mean, are the revenue headwinds you've talked about improving. You know, guide still implies, you know, revenue accelerates through the rest of the year and then into next year, you don't have the Afghanistan headwind and hopefully, you know, these headwinds don't exist either. I mean, are we past the worst of it or is it still kind of hard to tell?
Yeah, Gavin, thanks. Look, as Tom mentioned, you know, FY 2022 on the organic side, you know, revenue growth will be around 2.5%. Excluding Afghanistan, that would be around the 4.5% for organic and around 7% overall. You know, we're not giving corporate guidance, but, you know, to answer yours, we see sequential improvement as we go into Q3 and into Q4. You know, the headwinds in Q3 also offset a bit by more new work we're ramping up. On the EBITDA margin side, even though you didn't ask that, Gavin, you know, we're looking at 10.7, and that's going to track along with revenue growth.
You know, what I'd also like to share with you on these headwinds. Look, we've updated our expectations. They're our best estimate for the remainder of this fiscal year. We as you all know, we do a bottoms up program by program build. We're very confident in our view going forward. We have considered COVID trends, contracting officer shortages, supply chain challenges, you know, spending hesitancy under this current CR, as I mentioned earlier. What I wanna make certain is important for all of our listeners and our investors is to really separate the signal from the noise. The noise is short-term dynamics created largely by COVID. The noise is temporary. The signal remains a long-term opportunity for CACI, and those trends are on our side.
You all know we have a large and growing addressable market. We have strong awards and a growing backlog, and we're investing in and aligned to spending in many of the technology priorities of our customer set. Those factors and where we see revenue going throughout the year sets us up well for 2023.
Gavin, I'll add a little bit. We're guiding to organic growth 2.5% at the midpoint. The H1 of the year was 1.5%, so mathematically, you know, 3.5% in the back half. Some of that was driven by easier comps in the back half of Afghanistan headwinds, and we're going to kind of anniversary that, so that'll make it easier. We did lose a relatively large end of life expertise program last year, and that year-over-year comparison is easier in the back half than the H1.
We feel, you know, pretty good about hitting the higher kind of revenues in the back half, kind of due to those more singular events.
Okay, that's really helpful. I appreciate all that detail. Maybe just on M&A. You know, I think it's clear these acquisitions are doubling down on the technology strategy. But I think, you know, traditionally, you bought margin accretive businesses. I mean, is there a change in strategy here, or can you help us with, you know, some of the growth rates or longer-term margin opportunities of these businesses? Is this just the opportunities is so good here longer term that it's worth making the investment?
Gavin, I like the last part of that answer. Let me first of all thank you for that, for the question. Sure. Look, we love talking about the companies that we bring into the CACI family that are always driving deeper and more broader customer relationships as well as just exquisite capabilities for us. Look, at a macro level, SA Photonics and ID Tech are early-stage investments. We're investing ahead of need. And although they are EBITDA margin dilutive this year, they're accretive to EPS. They both have strong IRRs 'cause those are the kind of acquisitions that we have historically done. Let me talk a little bit about SA Photonics first. Look, they are the leading provider of multi-domain photonics technologies.
We put those announcements out a few weeks back. As I mentioned during my prepared remarks, they expand our LEO capabilities. They give us laser comms for airborne and maritime platforms. Those requirements not even defined yet, but beginning to be discussed because of the amount of information that's gonna need to be passed sensor to sensor and sensor to ground as the Defense Department builds out, you know, JADC2 and other ways of sharing information. They add manufacturing capacity for us, and they expand our customer and our contract footprint. SA Photonics is an early mover in a burgeoning market with significant growth potential. We talked about the absolute dollar growth in space.
We talk about the Space Force focus on more dollars going towards space, and most importantly, the intelligence community's focus on space. Tom mentioned there's $275 million in consideration. There's $25 million to their FY 2022 revenue, so full year, that's around $50 million. And it's an asset with scarcity value. Combined with what we do, we are the U.S. leader in that, and that's important when you think about intelligence customers and sensitive customers' missions who are not gonna search the globe to find other cross-link laser comm solutions to be pushing highly classified data. On the ID Tech side, they started as a VAR. You know, they've done some great R&D investments. We're gonna continue to invest.
They fill some great gaps, but they also complement what we're doing in our network area. You know, that Army program is looking at modernizing a number of Army networks to make certain that they can handle better than unclassified data. The other thing you need to meet the NSA's requirement of CSfC is to have commercial devices with a software wrap around them so that they can best protect that information. Having the networks out there without the devices doesn't help. Having devices out there without the network doesn't help. You know, we're gonna look to utilize their VAR knowledge to potentially reduce some of our off-the-shelf component costs in the rest of our business. That's a $200 million job.
It's $95 million for six months worth of revenue. I'd ask you to think, Gavin, the deal in two different pieces. You know, a very reasonable multiple for their CSfC capabilities. Think about mid-teens EBITDA. A very low multiple for the legacy business. Think mid-single digit. We are looking to build out investments in the rest of this year and throughout FY 2023 to make certain when both CSfC become fully funded, and we are right at the sweet spot of optical comm spending in the space market in the 2023 and 2024 timeframe, we're going to continue to invest. You know, I've made that statement numerous times. I'm not gonna not invest to meet a quarterly point when the world changes. The world is going to invest a lot in optical comms.
We are the largest and the best-positioned U.S. supplier of that. We're gonna continue to invest, and those EBITDA margins will continue to get to 11% and beyond for a number of years to come, which drive long-term growth in this company.
The next question comes from Colin Canfield of Barclays. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning, guys. Just following up on that margin comment there. Can you just talk us through the mechanics of how the government customer is pricing in wage inflation for fixed price contracts? Kind of how those pricing resets or how that cost reimbursement or however you wanna think about pricing those contracts in flows through over a multiyear period.
Yeah, Colin, thanks. Well, look, taking it closer to home, right around wage inflation, let me talk about that piece first, and then we'll talk about margins. You know, look, I've said at least over the last few quarters, paying up for top talent and specialized technology skills, certs and clearances and the like is nothing new, and we're very happy to pay people for that. You know, our increasing technology work, we're able to be more efficient and flexible in who we hire and how we leverage that talent. You know, revenue is not necessarily linear to head count, so we have a number of ways to absorb wages. You know, 60% of our revenue today is cost plus.
In a detailed manner, all of our costs are passed on to our customer, and our customers want us to hire the best and their brightest. They want us to look at folks who are, you know, technology natives and make absolutely certain that those people are gonna focus their long-term careers in national security. 60% of our revenue, all these costs will get passed on to our customer set, as all previous costs have always been. On the firm fixed price side, you know, that as well as some cost plus work gets pushed back to how efficient are we. We believe with our internship program, we're hiring the best and brightest.
You know, it may take 45 hours to get some job done, and based on the talent we're bringing in, that now takes 35 hours. The government wins. We win on a margin side. The government wins because we get more capability out to them sooner. It allows them to procure even more capabilities from us. On the indirect side, look, we put our shared service center in long before we talked about wage inflation. Because wage inflation compared to other parts of the Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia area is very different than what you'll see out west. That's where we decided to invest in.
Yeah. In terms of kind of overall kind of indirect expense, in the quarter, we were up around kind of 2%, again, on a year-over-year basis with, you know, comparable revenue growth. You know, absorbing kind of our annual merit increases, which we give to our employees, and absorbing, you know, some higher one-time expenses in the quarter associated with some acquisitions and kind of refinancing the debt as well. Despite those cost pressures, we're able to drive efficiencies across the enterprise and actually realize in our minds kind of very efficient cost controls. You know, that is, you know, productive, you know, as well for us.
Got it. A follow-up on strategy. Within the context of some of the recent competitions that CACI has been involved in, can you discuss the extent the DoD is splitting out software versus hardware bids, and how is that affecting the ramp of your growth?
Yeah, Colin, thanks. You know, I wouldn't say they're splitting it out to a large extent today, but you'll see some customers buying software in a very different manner. Let me share a couple of things there. With our BEAGLE contract with Customs and Border Protection, you know, where there's hundreds, a couple hundred digital applications that are out there that Customs and Border Protection agency uses day in and day out, they were looking for productivity enhancements, so for the same dollar, they could get more enhancements done to their digital apps.
We had already pivoted a number of years, 4-5 years back, moving towards agile software development, building three different agile software factories, to make certain that we were ready for that need. From purely the way software was delivered to the way it's being delivered today, we are seeing customers buy very differently. Where I have these n number of apps that I need to have MODDED, you know, what does it cost me to modify an app? And that's what the BEAGLE contract follows. They are beginning to contract differently.
You know, on the technology side, predominantly mission technology side, we are seeing customers move more towards software-based devices, which is that when the threat changes, how do I not go out and repurchase millions of devices? You know, the perfect example is, you know, you all have heard me say this. I hate using the iPhone as an example, but it's a perfect example. You know, there's been, what, 15 versions of the iPhone, and there's been, you know, 55 billion apps. So one would say that software on those phones changes far more often than the hardware device itself. So take that model, move that towards handheld devices, mobile fixed site, devices that are tough to get at.
Look at surface ship systems that are out there, that what they really need when the mission changes is a software upgrade. To bring that into port and tear circuit cards out and racks of equipment and change size, weight, and power issues, that's where the DoD's going. For a company our size, we don't need that many customers moving towards that on a year-over-year basis to be able to drive not only top line growth but also bottom line growth.
The next question comes from Mariana Perez Mora of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Good morning, gentlemen.
Good morning, Mariana.
My question is, last week, a U.S. Court of Federal Claims found CACI ineligible to bid on an almost $800 million U.S. Army contract for an encrypted device because of conflict of interest with some systems engineering work you do with the U.S. Army. We know these type of conflicts were the ones that drive the services bump up the price at the beginning, right? Would you mind discussing how you plan to navigate or mitigate this overlap as you grow your technology offerings?
Hey, Mariana. I'm sorry. This is Dan. You're breaking up a little bit in your question. I'm not sure if it's just the connection we have. If you don't mind, just give us a quick summary of that question one more time.
Of course. Can you hear me better now?
Better. Yeah.
That is better. Thank you.
Last week, U.S. Court of Federal Claims found CACI ineligible to bid on an $800 million contract for the U.S. Army for an encryption device, and because they found conflict of interest with some systems engineer work you do with the U.S. Army. As you grow your technology offerings, how do you plan to mitigate these type of overlaps in the bidding?
It was-
Got it. Mariana, thanks. Okay. What you're talking about is a recently awarded Army contract, which is still in an open protest window, so I don't wanna talk specifically about that award and where we stand there. The broader question, we are extremely careful to make certain that we are not involved in any of the requirements processes as to how the Army plans, and any other agency for that matter, is going to procure new equipment, so we don't have things like OCI and the like sort of, you know, catching us. Clearly, we wouldn't spend the dollars that we're spending in investing ahead of customer need and submitting proposals if we ever believe we have that issue. We've been very careful.
In fact, we've got a 100% track record of making certain that as we turn the knob down on some expertise business or in some parts of expertise business, we used to do a lot, you know, some assisting customer work, we're no longer doing that work. We're very, very careful. We have processes across this company to make certain that as parts of our business are looking to bid expertise work, we will not bid on that in favor of bidding on the technology work 'cause that's the right in line with the strategy for us to continue to grow CACI both top and bottom line.
Oh, perfect. Thank you for the color. Probably as a follow-up, what makes you confident that these headwinds are short term, the ones related to customer behaviors or capacity? If this is more like a new normal, how CACI or your customer could adapt to support this robust demand that you mentioned and actually convert it to contracts under the current operational restrictions?
Yeah, Mariana, I'll, you know, take a first stab at it. You know, we do have an abnormal set of circumstances, the resurgence of COVID, Omicron, you know, supply chain issues, you know, change in people's psyche, you know, a reduced workforce in the government and the like. I think everyone recognizes these are kind of unusual events. I think it's very reasonable to expect things to either get back to a more normative level or people learn to adjust, you know, associated with it.
The demand signal is out there, and the government customer will, you know, eventually, you know, kind of come to terms with it and, you know, purchase, you know, kind of services or goods to allow them to meet their, you know, central mission requirements. I think it's very reasonable to assume that we will get back to a kind of more normative level. It's unexpected that Omicron, you know, occurred when we put our guidance together at the beginning of the year. We did mention that, you know, we expected, you know, things to be a more normative level. This was a you know something again you know unexpected. You know, I think that's a reasonable framework to look at the world.
Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star then one. Our next question will come from Scott Forbes of Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning.
Morning, Scott.
Just to follow up on capital deployment. Tom, you mentioned you're at essentially 2.8 times leverage following the tax refunds, 3.1 at the end of the quarter. How are you viewing capacity and appetite for further deals from here?
Essentially the way we've always kind of, you know, viewed, you know, acquisitions. You know, we start with a strategy. You know, here is, you know, where we believe the demand signals are. Here is where we wanna go in the long term, and let's look for acquisitions to fill in gaps. They could be customer gaps, they could be technology gaps, they could be geographic gaps. Let's find companies with this right cultural fit, the right growth prospects, you know, at the right price to, you know, fill in those. You know, we continue to look for, you know, opportunities. Those, you know, are somewhat episodic. You know, the organization doesn't necessarily like to do, you know, two or three simultaneously. It puts stresses on the organization.
When they come available, we need to act, and we have the capability to act, kind of very choppy. You know, that desire to drive long-term value, kind of long-term increases in free cash flow per share, in the long term, sustainable businesses is kind of ever present.
Thanks. A quick follow-up for Tom. There's been a shift around R&D expense recognition for tax purposes, and there's some room for interpretation around what's kind of included in there. How are you viewing the potential impact to cash in fiscal 2023 if we don't see a repeal?
Yeah. Yes. Thank you. Yeah, as you know, this impacts, you know, CACI in fiscal 2023, based on the, you know, tax legislation. At the end of the day, it will have no impact on our GAAP earnings and earnings per share. As you note, if the legislation is not altered, it will have an impact on cash in the short run. We're in the stages of determining what that is. We'll be ready to disclose that as we get closer to releasing FY 2023 guidance. You make no mistake, it will have an impact on, you know, short-term cash. I think it's worthwhile recognizing that this simply is a timing issue.
You know, the tax benefits, you know, we will ultimately get instead of instantly and maybe over five years, but in the long run, you know, the cash flow will be exactly the same.
This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to John Mengucci for any closing remarks.
Thanks, Andrea, and thank you for your help on today's call. We'd like to thank everyone who dialed in or listened to the webcast for their participation. We know that many of you will have follow-up questions. Tom Mutryn, Dan Leckburg, and George Price are available after today's call. Stay healthy, and all my best to you and your families. This concludes our call. Thank you, and have a great day.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect.