Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Lashana, and I am your conference facilitator today. I would like to welcome everyone to Cleveland-Cliffs' second quarter 2020 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. The company reminds you that certain comments made on today's call will include predictive statements that are intended to be made as forward-looking within the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the company believes that its forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Important factors that could cause results to differ materially are set forth in reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q and news releases filed with the SEC, which are available on the company's website. Today's conference call is also available and being broadcast at clevelandcliffs.com. At the conclusion of the call, it will be archived on the website. The company will also discuss results excluding certain special items. Reconciliation for Regulation G purposes can be found in the earnings release, which was published this morning. At this time, I would like to introduce Lourenco Goncalves, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer.
Thanks, Lashana, good morning to everyone. Over the past few months, our company has put on full display the strong resilience that I have highlighted in the past. Despite dealing with a period of time in which our largest end market, the automotive sector, was effectively closed, we were able to preserve and enhance our business. Very early on, ahead of any official mandates or guidelines, we implemented initiatives to protect the health and safety of our employees. We adjusted our footprint for both the sharp reduction in demand as well as its gradual recovery, by taking down and then restarting 15 facilities over a three-month period. At the same time, we improved our strong liquidity position and preserved our healthy balance sheet.
In addition, acting as fast as only Cleveland-Cliffs can do, we were able to find a way to create $181 million in equity by executing a perfectly timed liability management transaction. Fast-forward to today. With our customers in the automotive sector back to more normal levels of activity, we have resumed production at all of our facilities that were temporarily idle, except the Norths hore Mine, which will be back in operation next week. With that, we are back on track and ready to fulfill our vision for the new Cleveland-Cliffs, which includes our mines and pellet plants, AK Steel, AK Tube, Precision Partners, and our new HBI plant. With our HBI plant in operation later this year, we will be able to add mini-mills to our portfolio of plants, and with that, spread our exposure to other sectors beyond automotive.
As you know, Cleveland-Cliffs is essentially a supplier to the automotive industry, both directly through our subsidiary, AK Steel, and indirectly through our third-party clients for blast furnace pellets. While we already are at the place where other steel companies would like to be, with more than 60% of our production and sales dedicated to automotive, our second quarter results were a direct consequence of the almost complete and sudden shutdown of the entire automotive sector, interrupting our revenues and generating costs associated to idling some of our assets. As unusual and unexpected as it was, that's what happened in Q2. As the second half of the year progresses, the steel shipments will continue to improve, and idle expense will fall back to zero. The second quarter did not change anything related to our strategy.
Our fully integrated footprint from captive iron ore mines through high-tech carbon and stainless steels and auto parts gives us a unique technological advantage no one else can replicate. In the demanding business of supplying steel to the automotive industry, chemical and metallurgical consistency is critical. We can do this very well because, among other things, we have our own iron ore production and are self-sufficient in pellets. We also have the right equipment to produce the highly specified materials our automotive clients need, including blast furnaces and BOFs for carbon steel, as well as electric arc furnaces and AODs for stainless steel, and state-of-the-art downstream facilities for both carbon and stainless steels. Equally important, we also have the dedicated brainpower and the R&D capability to develop the steels of the future cars, and that's something others in this market will not be able to accomplish anytime soon.
Our clients know that. Our competitors do, too. In the current U.S. automotive industry, our level of technical capabilities is more important to our clients than it has ever been. One unique element of automotive demand in the United States has historically been the prevalence of fleet sales, such as rental cars, which in the past have accounted for about 20% of all new vehicles sold. Different from retail clients, fleet buyers do not care as much about the quality of the car. To them, it's all about cost. Over the past three decades, we have seen cost, not quality, become the primary value for many American car makers. However, this approach is quickly becoming antiquated. Due to the pandemic, fleet sales are sharply down, whereas the retail car buyer has been largely unaffected, as sales to the American consumer of late have remained close to pre-COVID projections.
The American automotive market is now a consumer-driven market. The pandemic has made car ownership trendy again. While fleets buy cars because they're cheap, people buy cars because they are reliable, cool, and fun to drive. After decades of foreign competitors gaining market share in the United States by recognizing this trend, American-based car companies are starting to fight back. We finally have American car companies innovating again after a long period having their lunch eaten by global competitors. Tesla is the best example. Knowing that a car is actually just 1 tons of steel on wheels, a theoretical $200 per tons price increase for highly specified galvanized steel would theoretically force an increase on the final price tag of the car by only $200. No consumer would choose not to buy a car just because the car is now $200 more expensive.
Maybe fleet buyers would change their minds due to a $200 price increase per car, but not individual consumers. On the other hand, an equivalent price tag decrease of $200 would not be compelling enough to make anyone not planning to buy a car to decide to do so. That would certainly drive all the qualified steel suppliers out of business in the U.S. and also in other countries, such as Japan, Germany, South Korea, or France, just to name a few of the countries that are home for steel companies with technological expertise to supply all the needs and demands of the automotive industry of the present and of the future. Our goal with the new Cleveland-Cliffs is to be able to recover the value lost in the supply chain over the course of the last several years.
For decades, the steel companies have allowed highly specified steels carrying a lot of technology and value to the client to be treated and priced as commodity, as if anyone would be able to produce and supply the same materials. That's simply not true. In order to continue to invest and support the challenges of the automotive industry of the future, the steel suppliers, Cleveland-Cliffs included, must realize a return on their investment and w e will.
One problem we have been fighting since we acquired AK Steel is the proliferation of gossip and deliberate attempts to influence the market, all disguised as news that go around the steel market these days. In this parallel universe of misinformation, the steel mills are always one step away from flooding the market with unnecessary and unwanted products. Prices of scrap and steel products are always going down. If not, will go down soon.
HRC is a proxy for everything else in the steel business. Well, I'm pleased to inform that HRC, as defined by the CRUs, AMMs, and Platts of the world, is commodity-grade steel. It has nothing to do with automotive. It's a fine product for many applications, like in the energy market, but not for automotive steel. In fact, we at Cleveland-Cliffs and AK Steel do not care much about HRC, because hot rolled is just a small fraction of the product mix we sell. As far as carbon steels, what you really care about is automotive-grade galvanized steel and other products used in high-end applications, such as exposed parts. Our goal with future contract renewals will be to make it very clear, and over the course of the next years, we start receiving the proper value for what we do for our automotive clients.
We have already won the hardest battle of this war because our customers love our products and our ability to deliver high quality consistently and on time, as demonstrated by the award we recently received from General Motors as Supplier of the Year for the third year in a row. The next phase is translate this support into higher margins, which we will be implementing and accomplishing in due course. As you may recall, we did the same thing with the iron ore pricing back when I started at Cliffs. Back in 2015, the big players in Australia and Brazil were completely irrational, race to the bottom. Iron ore pricing was forecasted by every quote "to stay below $40 in perpetuity." We at Cliffs were the ones who called out the underlying absurdity of such a reckless attitude toward pricing. Ultimately, rationality was restored to the market.
Since then, we have enjoyed appropriate pricing, and the current number above $110 per metric tons is no longer a surprise. We are pleased that the recent recovery in manufacturing activity and demand has allowed us to bring our temporarily idle assets back to operation. Another, is that of the construction of our Toledo HBI plant. Through COVID-related restrictions on the number of workers allowed on-site, we're able to come up with a solution to start producing HBI before the end of this year. Due to these restrictions, we will need another four months to complete construction and to start operation. The intensified demand for locally sourced ore-based metallic made finding a way to restart construction sooner rather than later a top priority for us over the last couple months.
Last but not least, I would like to provide a brief update on the achievements of the synergies we committed to get when we acquired AK Steel back in March. We announced last quarter that we had already set in motion the $120 million in synergies that we expected to realize within one year. As of today, I'm pleased to announce that we have identified and set in motion a total of $151 million in synergies, exceeding our original target by $31 million. These additional synergies have come from a deeper understanding of our real needs at the overhead and operational levels four months into the acquisition of AK Steel by Cleveland-Cliffs. I will now pass it over to Keith Koci for a discussion on our quarterly results before giving my final remarks and opening the call for Q&A. Keith?
Thanks, Lourenco. As you noted, our second quarter results reflected the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the volume and cost side of each business segment. On a positive note, due to the contracts we have in place and the value-added nature of what we supply, overall pricing for both our steel and iron ore products was not impacted by the demand environment. Our quarterly consolidated adjusted EBITDA loss of $82 million was driven by lower than typical steel shipments, as well as $150 million in cash idle costs that were incurred as a result of the several facilities that were temporarily taken down during the quarter. In the Steel and Manufacturing segment, as expected, the most significant impact on shipments was from our automotive carbon side, which were about 250,000 tons for the quarter, down 65% compared to last year's second quarter.
However, momentum began to pick up by the end of Q2, and over 70% of the auto carbon shipments we recorded in the quarter went out in June, or 177,000 tons. That rate has accelerated into July, as we expect to record about 210,000 tons in auto carbon shipments. That is further evidence that the second quarter was truly an anomaly. In addition, the bulk of the idle costs recorded for the quarter came from this segment, which will be substantially reduced in Q3 as all temporarily idled facilities, including the Dearborn blast furnace last week, have resumed operations. As for Mining and Pelletizing, the sales volumes of 4.8 million long tons remained solid due to the take-or-pay arrangements we have in place and our customers' need to replenish inventories that were depleted during the winter.
Pricing per long tons also held in the mid-$90s as the strong IO index performance offset weaker HRC prices and pellet premiums. Our cost per tons was impacted by idle expense, which will be mitigated in future quarters now that Tilden has resumed operations and Norths hore is slated to restart next week. Our blast furnaces are still working through pellet inventories sold to them prior to the acquisition, most of our 1 million long tons of intercompany sales were eliminated from corporate EBITDA, translating to about $32 million in negative margin. That inventory will begin to be released in the third quarter, though we will still show some eliminated margin through the end of the year. Quarterly SG&A expenses were $62 million, of which $28 million flowed through corporate EBITDA and most of the remainder through our Steel and Manufacturing segment.
Our full year 2020 SG&A expectation has come down substantially to about $210 million, which represents about a 50% reduction from what the combined company would have reported last year. A clear illustration of the synergy achievement, as described by Lourenco. On the CapEx side, of our $145 million in cap spend during the quarter, about $90 million were HBI payments for work done in Q1. The remainder was sustaining capital and capitalized interest. We expect another $250 million in capital spend for the remainder of the year, with about $110 million of that related to the completion of HBI. We maintained our healthy liquidity throughout the pandemic. We currently have above $1.1 billion available to us between our cash balance and ABL availability. We received our second $60 million AMT tax refund of the year on July 14th.
Based on our current business projections, as well as the anticipation of over $100 million in working capital-related cash inflows, we expect to generate positive free cash flow in the second half of the year, which factors in the HBI CapEx. This would allow us to exit the year at a higher liquidity level than where we were at the end of Q2. In closing, we have weathered through the most stressful periods of the pandemic and taken the necessary actions to preserve our strong financial position, which allowed us to maintain the desired comfort necessary to restart our Toledo HBI project. We expect a fairly strong second half of the year, which should ultimately amount to our second quarter pandemic-driven results to be viewed as a blip in history and in advance of a robust recovery. Lourenco?
Thank you, Keith. Just like the American economy, our company has already proven its own resilience. The pandemic has changed a lot of things, but not the need for our high-end products in an increasingly discerning marketplace. We are ready to look past the impact of customers' shutdowns and look into the future where our competitive advantages will always prevail. With that, I'll turn it back over to Lashana for questions. Please.
Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Again, it is star one. We will pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Lucas Pipes with B. Riley FBR.
Hey. Good morning, everyone.
Good morning, Lucas.
Lourenco, I appreciated your comments on commodity-grade steel versus your highly specialized steel products. I guess we will see your second quarter carbon price in the 10-Q pretty soon, but would you be able to walk us through your carbon steel prices and costs in the second quarter and where you would expect them to go in the second half of the year? Thank you very much.
Well, we do not have a lot of exposure to commodity type of pricing because, as you know, Lucas, our contracts are set in stone for one-year timeframes. Therefore, the prices that we are basically selling to the automotive clients these days, and I'm talking 2/3 of our business plus, were set in place long time ago in a different pricing environment. It's a lot. We're not going to forecast any numbers towards the second half of the year. The prices are still good. The prices are still in good shape. What happened in Q2 was all demand related. They shut down. The last time that we had something similar to what happened in the automotive industry was during World War II, just to give you an idea. It was a complete shutdown. It came without a lot of anticipation or advice.
We are past that. June, the last month of second quarter, we're positive. We have stainless in the mix. The stainless was not very affected. We have electrical steels in the mix. Electrical steels are not very affected. We have a lot of positive things, but automotive was really bad. Going forward, we are seeing automotive in very close to normal levels. Big car manufacturers working three shifts and production levels are in the second half, we'll be back to normal. That would change dramatically the footprint. We're going to be able to show the power of the combination of Cleveland-Cliffs and AK Steel.
Thank you for that, Lourenco. To hone in on the second half, great to hear that you'll be cash flow positive. Are you able, at this point, to provide some sort of range? Are we talking $50 million, more than that, less than that? Kind of a rough ballpark. I believe Keith mentioned the AMT refund was obtained in July. Any other kind of discrete cash items that we should consider for the second half of this year to get to that free cash flow positive number? Thank you.
I will let Keith answer that. Keith, please.
Yes, Lucas. Yeah, the $60 million is a part of it. We're also anticipating about a $100 million release out of inventory during the second half of this year. That's going to be a contributor to the positive free cash flow. We're not going to disclose the exact amount. Your $50 million-$100 million is probably about right on what we're looking at right now in positive free cash flow for the second half. We'll wait to see how things go. There's definitely some potential for some upside to that too as the automotive market recovers.
That's very helpful. I appreciate that, and best of luck. Thank you.
Thanks, Lucas. Operator?
Your next question comes on the line of Scott Schier with Clarksons.
Hi, good morning, everyone.
Morning, Scott.
Following up on a few of Lucas's questions. Could you provide any kind of color or commentary around kind of your auto contracts and any early talks or expectations for how 2021 is shaping up?
We are in an ongoing process. Because we supply so much to automotive, that we're always in an ongoing process of negotiating with automotive. We, of course, do not, as you know, Scott, do not supply a color or detail on any commercial endeavors that we are doing and taking care of with clients. Overall, it's very positive. The clients understand our position. The clients are getting more and asking for more, not for less from AK Steel. We are the one-stop shop. We can produce great structural steels directly through AK Steel and indirectly through AK Tube. We can provide auto parts through PPHC, Precision Partners. We can provide carbon steels, galvanized, electro galvanized. Exposed parts, non-exposed parts. They like that a lot. We are in great shape as far as conversations with our great clients, and we're adding new.
It's not just the traditional ones. We are being very upfront and very open to entertain conversations and deals with the likes of Tesla and Nikola and Rivian and several other new names that are coming. We are very happy also that our traditional customer base, like General Motors and Toyota and Ford and Volkswagen and others, are going the same direction. We are looking to the future, and it's not a thing that we are going to go in a month-by-month or quarter-by-quarter basis. This is strategic. That's where we are at. Not all car manufacturers will survive, but some will. One thing I will tell you, Scott, we from Cleveland-Cliffs/AK Steel will be there with all these folks. Particularly the ones that are not price-driven blindly.
The ones that understand that if they really want to compete and win in the stock marketplace, they need to partner with us. They need to make money, we need to make money. The times of imposing price decrees with steel mills are over as far as the United States of America. We are not going to allow that to happen to Cleveland-Cliffs AK Steel. We don't want to go out of business, like several mills in Europe are going out of business. We're not going to do the same thing with ourselves. The good news is that the new wave of cars that are coming, and the new wave of car builders that are starting to gain momentum here in the U.S., they have this technological mindset. That's exactly where we are.
Okay. That's very helpful. I appreciate that color. Switching gears, are you able to provide any expectations around second half EBITDA, especially on the AK Steel side, specifically in terms of volumes for the second half? Now that some auto manufacturers are getting back to three shifts, are you expecting a return to a more normal run rate of volumes by the end of the year?
Yeah. Look, I think we provide a lot of color regarding what's happening in the second semester. Keith, you want to elaborate a little bit on numbers for good sense?
Sure, yeah. We won't disclose an EBITDA forecast, but we are counting on about 85% of normal in terms of automotive volume for Q3, and we're looking to 100% of normal by Q4. That's what we've got baked in that free cash flow assumption.
Okay, great. I appreciate that, and thanks for taking my questions. Looking forward to seeing the rest of the year play out.
Thank you so much, Scott.
Thanks, Scott.
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Fields with Bank of America.
Hey, Lourenco. Hey, Keith. Lourenco, your comments on the fleets were interesting earlier in your prepared remarks. Obviously, we're seeing problems with the rental cars, and Hertz has had a big issue with trying to reject their fleet contracts through their restructuring. How do you view the consumer able to or not able to make up for the lack of fleet buying this year and maybe next year? How does that sort of play out into the overall SAAR picture?
We have to see how these things will play, Matt, because despite of all these new trends, the overall consequence for us as a steel supplier has been a positive. The demand is there, so much so that we're seeing they are running full capacity or close to full capacity in several occasions, at full capacity in a few cases already at full capacity. They are unaffected so far. We are not the only ones supplying the automotive industry. I can only give you the perspective of Cleveland-Cliffs from the point of view of my subsidiary, AK Steel. Far, so good. The ones we are selling to are buying, and they are buying more, and they're asking for more, and things are picking up good. I'm not so sure about competition because I don't know. That's not my thing.
We brought capacity back at the right time. The Dearborn blast furnace is back with 22 years. We were able to bring it back in a very uneventful process. Fantastic jobs of our people in Dearborn and our technological team of blast furnaces, including help from people from Middletown. Great technological capability. Hats off for the blast furnace guys to bring back that furnace so smoothly in Dearborn. We've made changes in our footprint already, like the defensive idling of the hot strip mill at Dearborn. Now we have only one integrated company. We are going to have a hot strip mill in Middletown in the second half that will run at full capacity, full nominal capacity. That hot strip mill hasn't run at full nominal capacity for a long, long time. We adjust our footprint already to supply the market that we have.
The overall market is not taken care of by AK Steel alone. Others participate, and as far as I know, some other integrated mills are really hurting. We're good. We're in good shape.
All right. Thanks. Keith, you mentioned that the SG&A levels are kind of way down from the combined companies. I guess, is that a big part of the additional synergies you're able to find, or can you give us sort of a little breakdown about that $150 million of synergies kind of by bucket?
Sure.
What are the big chunks of that number?
Yeah, sure, Matt. The $151 million right now, you've got about $69 million that would be in the SG&A category. $82 million is cost of goods sold. You're breaking it down, $81 million in total for public company duplicate overheads, $56 million in asset optimization and another $14 million coming from the supply chain. The reductions in SG&A are really dramatic. You're seeing the synergy piece of it is really probably only about half of it. There's a couple of other factors that are going into that. We do have some accounting classification changes on the expense side. A sizable chunk of the SG&A costs that were being charged to SG&A last year by AK are now under the Cliffs methodology, are being inventoried and run through cost of goods sold. You're also seeing that as a factor.
The third factor is just the fact that costs are obviously down for other reasons. The synergies are what we consider permanent cost reductions. The other cost reductions are just the ones that come down as a result of having a year where profits are lower, so you've got lower incentive compensation, you've got lower travel costs because of the COVID-19. There's a number of other factors hitting it as well. Did that help you, Matt?
Yeah, that's great. Is there any additional pull through Precision Partners included in that number, or is that still yet to come?
Yeah, we are starting to see some movement in that direction, Q2 was definitely not the moment to execute on that because as you know well, Matt, the end market was shut down. Actually, Precision Partners was the first one to shut down and the first one to come back. The work has been done. I'll give you an example. Tesla, that was not a traditional client of AK Steel in the past, is working with us, both with Precision Partners and AK Steel. We're working all together. Precision Partners are part of the family. We are doing a lot of things. I'm mentioning Tesla because everybody's interested in Tesla, but it's happening with other manufacturers as well.
We are very excited with executing the plan that we put together for this combined company, and we are going to be delivering on these results in a lot shorter period of time than people believe.
Okay, great. Thank you. Last one from me. Assuming you have no more secured capacity, which hopefully you can confirm that, what's the plan or if there's any, or the outlook on any debt reductions in the back half of the year? If you have some cash coming in from AMT or working capital release, do you think there's some target or strategy on kind of being able to buy back more unsecured debt at a discount for the back half of 2020?
First of all, we have now one thing in place that allows us to continue to reduce debt without necessarily buying back debt on the market. That's ABL. I'm sure you noticed that we paid down the ABL in Q2. Despite of all the difficulties of the Q2, we were able to pay down the ABL with cash. Any excess cash flow generated will be used primarily to continue to pay down the ABL. That's the first thing. Second thing is that as far as the secured capacity that you mentioned, keep in mind the 2024 secureds will start to be available for us to redeem coming January, very close to par at $102.5 million. That's our next target in our treasure portfolio to address outside of the ABL. We have a plan, and we will continue to execute the plan.
We've created the cushion, the five years cushion that I normally do in my companies. Did with Metals USA, did with Cliffs, doing now with the new Cliffs. We have a plan, we'll continue to execute. Everything is lined up, we will restore the secured capacity as soon as we take down the 2024s at the right time, it will be done at the right time. Again, I would like to insist on that the primary source of reducing debt right now is paying off the ABL, that's where the cash will go.
All right. That's very helpful. Thank you, and good luck in the back half, guys.
Thanks a lot, Matt.
Thanks, Matt.
Your next question comes from the line of Alex Hacking with Citi.
Yeah, good morning. I have a couple of questions on Toledo. Could you remind us of your expectations for sales there next year? Also kind of remind us where you stand in terms of offtake with customers. I know you had a lot of previous discussions, and then also in terms of how those discussions have evolved in terms of a potential pricing structure. Thank you.
Toledo next year will be running to achieve nominal capacity. If we are going to be able to achieve that by the end of the year remains to be seen. Remember, when we were planning to start in June, pre-COVID, we knew that we would ramp up in the second half of the year and 2021 would be nominal capacity. We're going to be starting at the very end of the year, more likely in December. To make sure that we do everything properly and we don't trip over ourselves, we can't assure that we are going to be running at 1.9 million tons next year. If we don't get to 1.9 million tons, we're going to get really close, because on the other hand, we don't believe that the ramp-up will be a long one.
We have enough knowledge about our plant and about our processes to know that the ramp-up will be smooth. As far as off-take with clients, I have already explained that way too many times. HBI sells into the metallics market, into the scrap-based market, and that's not how the clients work. I addressed that in 2017, when I did not, I elected not to cut long-term deals to do project finance and went the route of issuing bonds and issuing other financial instruments, and doing that without having project finance. We are 100% confident that we are going to sell that product and sell that product at the right price.
More than that, Alex, we already developed the procedures to use HBI as coolant in the BOFs, particularly the off-spec material that will be generated as we ramp up the plant, and we will use that both in Middletown and Dearborn. We also have the procedures to use in our highly sophisticated EAFs at both Butler and Mansfield, our own plants. That will be in-spec material. Off-spec in BOF, On-spec in our EAF, we have the procedures. We can even work with our clients to develop the right way to melt HBI, and we are going to be very successful on that. As far as our prices and levels of pricing, you'll see when it's the right time, but not now. It will be very profitable, and HBI will be a big contributor to our EBITDA.
Okay. Thanks, Lourenco. Just to follow up, if I may. Thanks for the color. How much of that 1.9 million tons could you potentially consume internally?
250,000- 300,000 tons in a steady state year would be a very conservative number. We will do that, not because we want to just make the material disappear. It's because, as you may know, AK Steel is a buyer of scrap. We are going to be saving money by doing that, and we're not going to be doing anything to jeopardize our ability to generate EBITDA. We will not be, for that material, will not be having the same impact on the HBI side, but we're going to be having a positive impact on the cost side of the AK Steel facilities that I mentioned. It's cost advantageous to do that, but the numbers in the ballpark of 250,000 tons. The rest will be sold in the marketplace.
We have a lot of interest coming from the usual consumers in the EAF side, and we are not planning to sell to the blast furnace side because we don't want to give the competition the advantage that we will enjoy in our costs by using in Middletown and Dearborn.
Okay, perfect. Thank you so much, and good luck in the second half.
Thanks.
Your next question comes from the line of Matt Vittorioso with Jefferies.
Good morning. Thanks for taking the question, and thanks for the color on sort of the plan there at AK Steel around not treating your product as commodities. I'm wondering, how do you think about pushing price around your steel products at AK Steel relative to some of the aluminum competition? How does Novelis and some of the other aluminum guys factor into that equation?
Well, aluminum has been trying to become a mainstream material in cars for a long time. Except for the F-150, Ford F-150, they have never succeeded on pretty much anything that they tried. The biggest problem with aluminum is called the consumer. Consumers of F-150 with aluminum don't like the car. That's a fact. We have evidence of that. Ford never really advances beyond the F-150, and as far as I know, there are no plan for that. Another example of the failure of aluminum is the fact that the Tesla S was aluminum, and the Tesla 3 is predominantly, almost everything, steel. No matter how we skin the cat, aluminum will continue to be a wannabe. No matter what any aluminum company will say, they will continue to be outside looking in. The technological developments that I was talking about make steel better than aluminum.
From the overall cost standpoint for the car, a lot better. I don't have any problems with aluminum in the automotive industry.
Okay. Similar question on the iron ore side, I guess, just relative to competition. A lot of the great work you did on the iron ore contracts, I suppose is a function of your position in the market in North America. How do you think about some of the U.S. Steel iron ore pellets freeing up as they close some of their blast furnaces and look to market their iron ore into the market? If you had any comments or thoughts on the implied valuation of that deal with Stelco that was announced a little while ago, that would be interesting as well.
Yeah. I have no opinion on their deal with Stelco, and it would not be appropriate to comment on that. As far as the pellet market here in the United States, everything is playing exactly as we planned. We at Cleveland-Cliffs. Let me recap. Our contract with our biggest client, ArcelorMittal, goes through 2026, so it's totally out of reach for anyone else. The contract is extremely well done, and we are happy, they are happy, life's good. The second biggest client is AK Steel. I don't need to comment on that. I'll just emphasize that we are not going to consume any pellets other than Cleveland-Cliffs pellets. The third client is Algoma. Algoma, by design, we let the two addendums expire by 2020 because we needed the pellets to feed our HBI plant. It's happening as planned.
One contract will continue all the way through 2024, and two other contracts will expire by the end of the year because we have a better use and a more profitable use of these pellets feeding our plant in Toledo to produce HBI. Again, going as planned. The rest is the extra capacity that we built to produce DR-grade pellets, which we thought that we would find a good market for the pellets. I'm pleased to inform you that we already have a multi-year contract to supply the kind of DR-grade pellets production to a very good company and a very good operator of a HBI plant in Trinidad. We're in great shape with that. We're replacing, bottom line, we are replacing Algoma with Nucor. That's a hell of a good trade-off for us.
Replacing basic run-of-the-mill pellets that we supply Algoma in Canada with highly specified DR-grade pellets, coated pellets to Nucor in Trinidad. We're in fantastic shape.
Okay. Maybe one last very big picture question. A lot of the conversations we have related to your company, and just the broader steel industry is, how do we think the sort of share in the domestic steel market shifts between EAFs and blast furnaces over the coming decade. Do you have any big picture thoughts? It seems like EAFs kind of shot up to 2/3 of the market fairly fast, but maybe it's plateauing a bit. Any high level thoughts on how you see that playing out going forward? I guess to some extent, your HBI product maybe aids the EAFs to some extent as they're able to produce better products with your pure iron inputs, but just high level thoughts on that would be helpful, I think, for the market.
Matt, you already answered your own question. You said it right. The electric arc furnace operators did a fantastic job during the last, let's call it, 30 years to grab the market share that was available to them. They did with a very well executed plan, taking advantage of their flexibility, the fact that they are nimble, the fact that they can do a lot of things for a lot less cost. That's all great. Now, when push comes to shove, we are getting to that last stretch that technology matters. The R&D support matters. The ability to produce the steels that their equipment doesn't allow them to produce matters. We are going to continue to defend that niche, as you can understand from my speech here.
We are not going to even use price because we are so confident that what we do is differentiated, that we will continue to explain and educate on that. We know a lot of EAFs. They're extremely competent. If you pay attention to the landscape, you are going to see that not everybody is Nucor, not everybody is Steel Dynamics in the EAF. These are two great companies, great operators. You go beyond that, you might find a CMC, that's also a good company, and then we will start to have some difficulties to identify and find the good operators. On the other hand, when you look to the automotive footprints throughout the entire world, you are going to see that in Japan, Nippon Steel, JFE, they are blast furnace operators. Why is that? Japan has a lot of scrap.
Why Japan doesn't migrate to EAFs and give Nippon Steel and JFE a run for their money in the automotive business? I will answer the question, because they can't. Same thing with South Korea, with POSCO. POSCO is, by and large, for the automotive business, a blast furnace steel mill. Even though they have mini- mills, like we do, too, at AK Steel. Things are not as simple as you read in the gossip press. Let's take one step back and look exactly what kind of steels we are talking about. We are talking about steels that we cannot produce through the EAF route. Some they can, and they are doing a good job, and then they are growing their participation. The limit is there. Will our HBI help them? Yes, marginally.
What they can do today with pig iron, they will not be able to do much better with our HBI. More efficiently, yes. More repetitively, yes. With a better and narrower chemical composition, absolutely. This will not be a differential for them. The differential will be that they will have a supplier in the country instead of having to import from Ukraine or Russia or whatever. We are pretty much at the top of what was the transition to EAFs to blast furnaces. Guess what? There's a new operator in the EAF, in the blast furnace sector, called Cleveland-Cliffs, that is our competitor who understands the business, understands the technology involved to produce these steels for cars, has the R&D capability. I am absolutely impressed with the depths of knowledge that I found at AK Steel in both the R&D department and product development departments.
We are going to continue to leverage that to pair with our ability to supply feedstock to that great company. That's how the business will go going forward.
Helpful as always, Lourenco. Thank you.
Thank you, Matt.
Your final question comes on the line of Phil Gibbs with KeyBanc Capital.
Hey, Lourenco, Keith, and team, good morning. Thanks for taking my question.
Good morning, Phil.
I apologize if you talked about this already, but the synergy number, I think, was north of $150 million. How much of that did you achieve in the second quarter, and how much relative to that number on an annualized basis do you have to go?
Yeah. In June, we hit a run rate of $84 million, so we picked up $7 million alone in the month of June. For the quarter, it was about $17 million. By the beginning of Q4, we should be at that $120 million that we talked about on the last call, and the full $151 million will kick in by January 1, 2021.
Were you going to say something, Lourenco? I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Phil. What?
No, I thought you were going to say something, Lourenco. That's all.
No.
When we think about it, you've got a full $150 million next year, Keith, and this year, given what you've realized so far and what you expect to realize in the second half, is that gets you somewhere around ±$50 million ? Trying to think about it.
Yeah, that's pretty close, Phil. Yeah, like $65 million or something like that for the current year. Somewhere around there.
Okay.
Yeah, a little more than that, Phil. It could be like in the $65 million-$70 million level.
$65 million-$70 million. You're getting that extra juice in next year's numbers then, in terms of the synergies, having them for a full year and then also stepping them up.
That's correct.
Where did you find more?
Look, the more we integrate and the more we understand and the more we develop the way we do business with AK inside the footprint, the more we can do things. I'll give an example that was not part of our original plan. AK Tube now is part of the commercial effort of AK Steel, 100%. AK Tube was treated as a separate company. We are in the process of doing the same thing with Precision Partners, not to the point that Precision Partners will become a department of AK Steel, because that's what AK Tube is right now.
The level of integration makes for things that we did not predict coming from the outside to see that we can do these things in the real life. Another thing is that due to our ability to absorb new things in our office in Cleveland, or actually, we still don't have our people back in the office, but our home office is in Cleveland, we continue to reduce the same things in West Chester. The time and the knowledge of the new corporation makes for this process of absorbing synergies to become kind of a natural thing. Things are coming in a very exciting way. Another point that I need to clarify is that with the combination of AK Steel into Cleveland-Cliffs, we're able to redo a number of big contracts with serious advantages for the company, money-wise.
That's also a big portion of what this boosted number is coming from, because now we have, I'll give an example, railroad transportation. We created things that were not part of our original plan. The fact that we no longer have a hot strip mill in Dearborn made for more transport between Dearborn and Middletown and back, which is not a good thing. It is a good thing because in the big scheme of things, we're saving a lot of money, and we are optimizing our Middletown hot strip mill. With that, we're able to redo the entire thing with railroad transportation, and we're able to enjoy a lot of costs in this SG&A, and not even just SG&A contract type of expenditures.
Just as a follow-up, again, apologize if I missed this. In terms of your pellet shipments this year in the business, was there an update in terms of what you think that will be? Sub-question, assuming $450 hot band and $110 iron ore and the current pellet premium, where does that put you for pricing in the back half as well? Thanks.
Keith, you want to take that?
Yeah, we didn't really give guidance on pellets in what we put out so far. We see the pellet shipment Q3 should be very similar to Q2, maybe slightly improved. We should see a pickup in Q4 as well, as we normally see as the blast furnaces need to stock up before the locks close for the winter. That's kind of the volume output. If pricing were to stay where it is today, we'd end up the year probably in the low $90s on a pellet price, and you might see a true up in Q3. Maybe Q3 would be a little bit lower, but it would average out to low $90s for the full-year rate if prices stay where they are today.
Very helpful. Appreciate it. Thanks so much.
You bet. Thanks, Phil.
There are no additional questions at this time.
All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. It was a pleasure to be with you guys on the phone today. It is an exciting time for Cleveland-Cliffs. Thanks for your interest, and we will keep in touch. You all have a great day. Thank you. Bye now.
Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.