Good day, everyone, and thank you for joining us to discuss Equity Lifestyle Properties Third Quarter 2019 Results. Our featured speakers today are Marguerite Nader, our President and CEO Paul Seavey, our Executive Vice President and CFO and Patrick Waite, our Executive Vice President and COO. In advance of today's call, management released earnings. Today's call will consist of opening remarks and a question and answer session with management relating to the company's earnings release. As a reminder, this call is being recorded.
Certain matters discussed during this conference may contain forward looking statements in the meanings of the federal securities laws. Our forward looking statements are subject to certain economic risks and uncertainties. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any statements that become untrue because of subsequent In addition, during today's call, we will discuss non GAAP financial measures as defined by SEC Regulation G. Reconciliations of these non GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release, our supplemental information and our historical SEC filings. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Marguerite Nader, our President and CEO.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us for our Q3 earnings call. Today, we will be focused on a detailed review of our Q3 results, our initial 2020 guidance and our rationale for the recommended 2020 dividend increase. Our 3rd quarter results released yesterday show strong quarter and year to date trends. Year to date, we increased occupancy by 2 62 sites And this quarter marks our 40th consecutive quarter of occupancy growth. The home sale market was strong as evidenced by our rental conversions and resale activity.
Our online transaction activity continues to escalate. In the quarter, our RV revenue booked through our website increased 19% and our sales of online camping These followers are converting to loyal customers. Our RV revenue, including 1,000 Trails, has grown 5.6% year to date. This growth has been fueled by growth in our annual income and our Thousand Trails revenue. The annual growth of 6.1% is comprised of 5.2% rate 90 basis points of occupancy.
Our 1,000 Trails portfolio revenue increased from both the dues revenue and upgrades. Year to date, we've seen an increase in sales of 12% and an increase of upgrades of 13%. Turning to 2020. Each year, we finish our budget process in October and provide detailed projections for the following year. We have issued guidance of $2.22 at the midpoint for next year, which is 6.1% growth rate in FFO per share.
Seasonal and transient activity require additional visibility to be able forecast with more accuracy. As is our practice, we will update guidance each quarter as we have more knowledge about reservations at the property level. Our MH and RV properties continue to experience heightened demand as seen in occupancy and rate growth. Our team members work with the homeowners to determine best use of capital investment within each asset. Within our MH portfolio, By the end of October, we will have noticed 50% of our residents for rent increases and anticipate 4.4% growth in MH revenue.
Our RV revenue is anticipated to increase 5.2%. Strength in our RV annual base along with strong performance Thousand Trails are the main contributors to this projection. Our product is in demand and the demographic trends are in our favor. Baby boomers are relocating to our key states and the demand can be seen in the increased online and on property activity. Additionally, we are seeing an increased number of multi generational customers.
We now have customers who have vacationed at our properties bringing their children and grandchildren. This exposure to the millennial and Gen X demographic will be helpful in filling our future long term customer pipeline. Millennials now represent 26% of RV buyers and Millennials and Gen X combined represent more than half of RV buyers. I would like to update you on our proposed 2020 dividend policy. The dividend policy is a Board level decision that's typically made at our Q4 Board of Directors meeting.
We feel it's helpful to highlight management's recommendations and rationale with respect to the dividend. Historically, we have been able to take advantage of opportunities due to the free cash flow generated by our operations. Consistent with in the past, in 2020, we expect to have in of $53,000,000 of discretionary capital after meeting our obligations for dividend payments, recurring capital expenditures and principal payments. Each year to arrive at a recommendation, we review our projected growth in FFO and our outstanding obligations with a goal of maintaining our underlying financial flexibility. In addition, we stress test our future obligations to ensure we can continue to meet both our financial obligations and The stress test reveals the strength of our balance sheet, which has been fortified over the years with longer term maturities.
Currently, our average term to maturity is 12 years, which is double the REIT sector average. We are focused on long term value creation. The stability and growth of our cash flow, our solid balance sheet and the strong underlying trends in our business have led our management team to recommend a 12 To give a little history, over the past 5 years, we have increased our dividend 83%. Please note that while this is management's recommendation, The Board has not yet approved this recommendation. Our team members continue to deliver a great experience to our customers.
I appreciate their hard work and I look forward to the start of the snowbird season as we welcome back our residents and guests for the winter season. I will now turn it over to Paul to walk through the numbers in detail.
Thanks, Marguerite, and good morning, everyone. I will review our Q3 results, Discuss our guidance assumptions for the remainder of 2019 as well as our preliminary guidance for 2020 and provide some comments about our balance sheet. Please note All per share remarks reflect our recent 2 for 1 stock split. We reported better than expected 3rd quarter normalized FFO of $102,700,000 or $0.53 per share. As a result of the completion of the Loggerhead Marina acquisition, other income was higher than expected because of preferred distributions from our joint venture investment.
During the quarter, we also settled the remainder of our Hurricane Irma insurance claim. We recognized approximately $5,900,000 of revenue that we've deducted our calculation of normalized FFO. Core base rental income was up 5.4% compared to year with 4.7% coming from rate and 70 basis points coming from occupancy. We gained 58 occupied sites in the quarter as a result of increasing our homeowner count by 85 and reducing rental occupancy by 27. Our core RV revenues were in line with guidance in the quarter.
Annual and seasonal revenues showed strong growth of 6.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Rate increases for our annual customers contributed 5.5% with the remainder of our revenue growth generated from occupancy gains across the portfolio. Our transient demand remains strong as evidenced by the combined growth of our transient resort revenues and our membership subscriptions. In addition, transient site usage by members was up more than 10% in the quarter compared to last year. A limited number of locations within our RV footprint did not as expected, resulting in lower transient revenue than guidance during the quarter.
Membership subscriptions and upgrade sales revenues were higher than guidance in the quarter. During the quarter, we sold 5,900,000 Trails Camping Pass memberships. Year to date, our Camping Pass sales volume has increased 12% compared to last year. Upgrade sales volume in the quarter was 859 units at an average price of approximately $6,700 The net contribution from membership sales and expenses was higher than guidance, mainly as a result of sales of our higher cost upgrade product. Utility and other income is in line with guidance and lower than last year because of insurance proceeds received in the Q3 of 2018.
In the quarter, core property operating maintenance and real estate tax expenses were higher than forecast, mainly from repairs and maintenance and utility expenses. A portion of the variances in repairs and maintenance and utility expenses resulted from utility system repairs and related water usage. In addition, electric expenses were higher than forecast in all regions as weather patterns resulted in increased demand. Finally, while the Quarter was relatively mild. On the storm front, we did incur close to $500,000 of storm related expenses that contributed to our variance to guidance.
Overall, core NOI before property management grew 5.1% in the quarter year to date periods. NOI from non core properties was $4,800,000 in the quarter. This includes NOI from the Marina portfolio we announced closing in mid September. Year to date, the acquisition properties in the non core have performed as expected. Property management and corporate G and A Expenses were $23,300,000 in the quarter.
Other income was higher than guidance. Upon closing of the Marina acquisition, we recognized Income from preferred distributions related to our joint venture investment that had previously been deferred. Financing costs of $25,500,000 include interest expense on borrowings to fund our acquisition activity. Year to date normalized FFO was $1.58 per share, a growth rate of 8.4% 2018. The press release and supplemental package provide 4th quarter and full year 2019 guidance in detail as well as preliminary 2020 guidance.
As I discuss guidance, keep in mind my remarks are intended to provide our current estimate of future results. All growth rates in revenue and expense projections represent midpoints in our guidance range. Our 4th quarter normalized FFO guidance is $98,600,000 or $0.51 per share at the midpoint of our guidance range. We expect core NOI growth of 4.6% in the 4th quarter to contribute to 0.9% core NOI growth for the full year. We assume no core MH occupancy gain during the quarter.
Looking ahead to the Q4 in our RV business, our current annual seasonal and transient reservation pace is in line with our expectations. Page 17 of our earnings release shows historical and projected revenues from our membership business. We expect total revenues of $111,300,000 in 20.19, a growth rate of 7.5% over 2018. For the full year, we expect core revenue growth of 4.4% and core NOI growth of 4.9%. The impact of the Marina acquisition can be seen in the increase in non core NOI, which is partially offset by increased interest expense.
Other income and expense have been reduced as we will no longer receive preferred distributions from the Marina JV. Full year normalized FFO at the midpoint of our guidance range is about $401,000,000 or $2.09 per share, a growth rate of 7.9%. The midpoint of our preliminary guidance range for full year 2020 normalized FFO is approximately $426,400,000 or $2.22 This represents a 6.1% increase over 2019 normalized FFO per share. Growth in core NOI before property is expected to be approximately 5.3%. Our projections of core NOI and normalized FFO growth for 2020 Assume Q4 2019 results will be consistent with our stated guidance.
Consistent with our past practice, we plan to update guidance on our January call And we may adjust growth rates on certain line items after we finalize results for 2019. We assume no growth from incremental occupancy we may gain in our MH properties during 2020. Base rent is expected to grow 4.4%, with 4% coming from rate and 40 basis points from occupancy as a result of sites we've filled in 2019. In our core RV Resort business, we expect 5.1% growth in 2020. Our annual revenues are expected to represent more than 60% of our total RV revenues, and we expect 5.3% growth, mainly as a result of increases in rate across our portfolio.
We project 4.6% growth in seasonal revenues and 4.8% transient revenue growth. During the Q1, we expect to generate more than 50% of our seasonal revenue for the year and more than 20% of our transient revenue. Though the winter season is still weeks away, we considered our seasonal and transient reservation pace for the Q1 2020 when developing our guidance assumptions. As Marguerite mentioned, we have limited visibility into seasonal and transient revenues beyond the coming quarter. We intend to continue updating guidance throughout 2020 as we have better visibility into reservation trends.
Our budget assumes total revenue generated by our membership business will be $118,100,000 as shown on Page 17 of the earnings release. We assume sales and activations of 42,700,000 trails camping passes next year, an increase of 4.7%. We assume membership upgrade volume will exceed $3,000 at an average price of around $6,500 Core property operating maintenance and real estate tax expenses are assumed to increase 3.1% in 2020. Our budget for repairs and maintenance expense assumes normal run rate operations. We have maintained our historical practice and have not assumed expenses related to property damage other one time items in our guidance.
We do note that over the past few years, we have seen an increase in volatility related to weather events, Impact on our properties and the cost to maintain and repair assets as a result. We intend to continue to provide updates quarterly when these unexpected events occur. Our guidance for non core properties includes the expected contribution from the properties we've acquired during 2019. We assume no other acquisition activity in our 2020 guidance model. Our other income and expense budget Normal run rate income generated by our MH and RV joint ventures.
As a reminder, in 2019, we recognized approximately $2,000,000 JV income related to a refinancing distribution from 1 of our joint ventures. Our guidance for financing costs and other includes the cost of debt fund the Marina acquisition, but does not assume any impact from other future capital events. Now I'll comment on our balance sheet. We have no debt maturing during the remainder of 2019. In 2020, we have approximately $49,000,000 of secured debt maturing in the second half of the year.
Current secured debt terms are 10 years at coupons in the 3.5% to 4.25% range, 60% to 75% loan to value And 1.35 to 1.5 times debt service coverage. GSEs and life companies continue to quote MH and RV deals at rates well inside CMBS. High quality age qualified MH assets continue to command best financing terms. We continue to place high importance on balance sheet flexibility. Our interest coverage is 4.8 times and our line of credit has $280,000,000 of availability with an accordion feature that provides $200,000,000 of additional Now we would like to open it up for questions.
Our first question comes from Nicholas Joseph of Citi. Your line is open.
Thanks. What drove the Decision to acquire your JV partner's interest in the Marina portfolio and then how has NOI performed relative to your expectations and versus MH and RV NOI growth.
Sure. So we've been in the JV that included the Loggerhead portfolio over the last two years, And we've really had a chance to see how these top tier properties have performed, and we were happy to be able to take over 100% ownership. That JV includes 11 coastal marinas in Florida. These properties, they have a high degree of annual cash flow with over 80 Percent of the revenue from annual site rent. We plan to operate these assets Side by side with our Florida location, and they really they provide long term stable cash flow.
What we've Seeing from 2017, an increase of about 5% growth in NOI each year. And so it's been some healthy growth in NOI. And overall, we're We're pleased we are taking over the operations of the assets and I'm pleased to be able to do that.
Thanks. Is there an opportunity to acquire additional marinas? How large of exposure could you see your marine exposure growing to?
There are about 4,500 marinas in the United States, 500 we would consider institutional quality. So it's and there's about 3 large owners account for less than 5% of the overall revenue in the Marina space. So it's highly fragmented. I think much like what you've seen us do in the RV space where there's marinas that have long term cash flow that makes sense for us that are in locations that we like, you'd see us continue to buy. Thanks.
Thanks Nick.
Our next question comes from John Kim of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Thank you. Just sticking with Loggerhead, what was the interest rate of the joint venture debt? And do you plan to refinance it or keep it unencumbered?
The debt had to be paid off at closing. And so, what we did, as you saw, was use our line of credit. And what we plan to do with respect to the marinas, really we have the objective of developing secured lending relationships to finance the marinas Quality and characteristics similar to this portfolio. The plan really is to execute in a manner similar to the experience that we had in 2,004 When we entered the RV business, at that time, there was a select group of lenders and brokers that were familiar with underwriting RV Resorts. And I put together a plan at that time to partner with those lenders and brokers, at the same time educating others so that we could expand the network of available lenders.
A key factor that helped us with that, accessing institutional debt capital for the RV space was showing the sticky relationships with customers and longer term revenue streams that are really analogous to MH revenues. And we think that similar characteristics exist in the Marina space And plan to build on past experience to expand the lending network for these assets.
So what interest rate could you Finance Marina assets today versus MH or RD?
I think it's a little early to say that. I think that as I mentioned, we're 0.5% to kind of 4.25% in the space right now. And I'd say that there There's probably a bit of a spread to that pricing, but it's a little bit early to talk specifics on what pricing would
Okay. And then a question on MH occupancy. I guess you had 40 straight quarters of occupancy growth, which I assume is year over year, it's been flat sequentially. And you're not assuming any growth in occupancy in your 20 guidance, which was consistent from last year, but how much room do you think is left on the occupancy front getting any potential increases from 95.4% today?
It's Patrick. 54% of our properties are currently 98% to 100% occupied. So we see opportunity to continue to grow occupancy across the portfolio. Half of our vacancy is in Florida, which has got a really good demand profile In migration and has performed well for us. And we're seeing strength even in the secondary markets like Las Vegas as an example, Minneapolis.
So with a good demand profile and that occupancy profile, we're looking at 46% of our properties with an opportunity That's a girl off to 98% and perhaps
more. And as it relates to that 98%, the ones that are 98% They have been in that range for 10 plus years. So once it gets to that level, it can certainly stay at that level.
Can you comment on how many sites you expect to add through expansions this year and In 2020?
Sure. In 2019, about 1,000 sites and a similar number of 1,000 to 1200 in 2020.
Great. Thank you.
Thanks, John.
Our next question comes from Drew Babin of Baird. Your line is open.
Hey, good morning.
Good morning, Drew.
Question on your MH rate growth, it looks like it's been trending towards the upper 4s versus maybe closer to 4% kind of in the past. Just curious, whether there's been a contribution there From ROI CapEx? Or is that just a product of your properties being more occupied and having more Kind of traction to drive rate. Could you maybe decompose that a little bit?
Yes. I think what we're seeing there and we've talked about it a little bit in the past is that We meet with the Homeowners Association. We sit down and talk to them about what they would like to have happen at the property between Events, amenity upgrades, just things that they're interested in. And when we sit with them, we are at the same time, we talk about what the rate increase is, what the proposed rate increase and we share with them what our market survey is. So how did we get there?
And I think as a result of that and kind of adding that additional kind of CapEx or amenity feature to it has been helpful in getting to the numbers that you've seen us post. But effectively, we're taking The CapEx dollars that we had allocated and then just discussing with our residents where the best use of that capital is.
Okay. And I guess one follow-up to that. It looks like 2020 guidance assumes rate growth kind of reverts to that 4%. Is there anything behind that other than just kind of caution given that it's early? Can we assume the same sort of assumptions when it comes To the CapEx projects you mentioned and kind of the overall environment?
I think your observation is a reasonable one. I think that Some of the contributors to the uptick in growth are the result of the discussions that Marguerite just mentioned. There's also potentially an increase in rate on turnover and so forth that because we don't dial in increased occupancy That has contributed in the past. So there's a possibility that those would contribute going forward.
Okay. Appreciate the color. And one more for me. It sounds like the Marina business that you're looking into secured debt, There's possibly some larger plans within it. I was just hoping you could talk about as this business grows, if it grows, Are there any accounting nuances or anything where that business maybe works a little differently than MH or RV that need to be dealt with and or non REIT income potentially coming from fuel sales, things like that.
Maybe just expand on that a little bit and maybe some of the unique challenges that come with potentially expanding in that business?
Yes. I'd say it's similar to what we see in the RV business. There's ancillary activity at the marinas, fuel sales as an example That are not requalifying revenue streams. The structure that we have is for ownership of the marinas and operations of those businesses is quite similar to the structure that we have in the RV business. And we pay very close attention to that, of course.
But I think that for purposes of debt underwriting part of what we are working to Educate lenders on and really develop a program around is the long term in the streams that Marguerite That's really that was really the hallmark of our success in developing the RV program, and we anticipate that to continue on the Marina
program. And I think through what you could see inside of the Marina side just on like the RV side that you could have a highly transient Marina that has a lot of ancillary revenue and you would see us not interested in That, just like what you see on the RV side.
Great. Appreciate the detail. Thank you.
Thanks, Drew.
Our next question comes from Todd Stender of Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
Thanks. And Paul, just to stay on that theme, I'm guessing marinas aren't able to tap agency debt. That's fair to say, right?
That is fair to say, yes.
Yes. So you'll stay in the secured side? I mean, does this eventually open up the possibility if you can expand this property type of you get more on unsecured side?
I'd say it's something that's evolving. I would caution everybody to remember this is quite a small part of our business. I mean just in terms of total value, we're talking about less than $200,000,000 that Has been invested. And so we're going to be working on developing these relationships, exploring what the opportunities are And anticipate that we'll have success with that, but I think we can provide you updates in future quarters as we make progress.
All right. Thanks. And just to highlight that piece of what you've invested so far. So is your cost basis the original 30, The $49,000,000 you just spent plus the $72,000,000 in debt?
Well, the original was $35,000,000 There was the initial funding and then there was an earn So there was $35,000,000 plus the pieces that you mentioned.
Got it. Okay. And then how about yield? How have you I guess maybe if looking at if you do on an IRR basis for the last 2 years and what do you how do you look at your going in yield I guess on marinas.
So what we had on these marines we had on our preferred piece that it was a 7% preferred, which we discussed at the time we Entered into it and this is a 6% cap rate on the transaction that we did.
Got it. And I know it's small, but if you do grow it, will you be breaking out revenues, expenses, NOI for the marinas?
I think that we would look to report revenue streams similar to the RV business, I should say, the annual seasonal transient.
Okay, got it. Thank you.
Thanks, Todd.
Our next question comes from Joshua Dennerlein of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open.
Hey guys. Just One follow-up on the marinas. You mentioned 5% NOI growth. How much of that was driven by rate versus occupancy gain?
It was roughly half half.
Okay.
And yes, so it's roughly half half.
So is it like a 2.5% rate increase per year? That's correct.
That's correct.
Okay. And then on the R and M expenses, I think you mentioned those were Higher than kind of what you were forecasting. Was that all storm related or was there something else going on there as well?
No. Well, As I mentioned, we had expenses coming from some water system in the quarter and related utility expenses and then the electric expense with elevated just elevated demand really and about $500,000 This was related to storm activity.
Okay. Okay. And you expect that to kind of normalize, I guess, going forward?
We've dialed into our Q4 guidance kind of an adjustment to our assumptions based on what we experienced in the Utility expenses in Q3, but that's already dialed into Q4.
Okay. Is there any ability for you guys to kind of continue pushing the utility costs down to the tenant instead of kind of having it Paid at the community level?
I think that we've been definitely active in unbundling as we call Charging residents separately for their utility usage. One area that we are focused on is In the RV communities to the extent that we're not billing back customers focusing on how we can how we might be able to do something like that.
And then, Josh, we have a focus on just conservation of resources so that we'll see that and just trying to kind of get that word
Our next question comes from Samir Khanal of Evercore ISI. Your line is open.
Good morning. Paul, can you talk about Property taxes, as we think about sort of expense growth next year, I know last year there was some pressure from Florida, which might have Hit this year as well. But as we think about sort of the next 12 months, are there any states which are going through sort of real estate tax assessments Considering where property valuations are that could surprise us to the upside?
So I think that I'll talk first about Florida. We've received the annual trim notices related to the Florida real estate taxes. The notices when they come in, they present potential tax amounts. There's a range from low to high on those notices. Most of them reflect rates of increase that are generally consistent with our expectations, but there was one county in particular that proposed increase at the high end of the range.
We've initiated appeals in this county and we have not adjusted our real estate tax expense In Q3 or our guidance pending outcome of those appeals. Overall for the year, we expect a mid single digit increase in core real estate taxes This year and we'll come back in January with an update on our progress as we go through the process Receiving the final bills to understand exactly where each county falls out in the low and high end of the range, and how we're making progress on the appeals I just mentioned. Broadly across the country, I'd say, we see pockets at points in time, where there are increases. But we're not consistently seeing elevated levels of real estate taxes kind of beyond that mid single digit increase
Okay. So right now, I guess for 2020, you're at sort of with the real estate tax, which kind of lumped into one line. It's about sort of 3% I'm sorry, it's 3% right now. So there is there could be some Chris, the upside, if depending on what you get back from Florida, is that kind of what you're saying?
Well, the real estate tax number embedded In that 3% growth is higher, it's closer to 5%. We have some expectations of savings in some of our other line items related To activity in 2019.
Okay, got it. All right. Thank you.
Sure. Thank you.
Our next question comes from John Pawlowski of Green Street. Your line is open.
Thanks. Paul, maybe just a follow-up to that last question. The closer to 5% growth number for 2020, 2019 was a similar growth rate for real estate taxes. Is that fair?
Yes. The one thing I should have mentioned in my comments a moment ago as I spoke to Florida, to the extent that we do see Increases in those real estate taxes, there is an opportunity for pass throughs in certain properties. So there potentially is recovery in 2020 of some of that Tax increase in the event that the appeals aren't completely successful.
Okay. Marguerite, on the acquisition front, curious if the Jensen's portfolio met your quality and Geographic
criteria? Just like we've talked in the past, we underwrite and look at it's a small industry, so there's a lot of people looking around at those assets. And we did look at it And did not obviously buy it.
Okay. Do you expect another large portfolio in several $100,000,000 range to trade in the next 12 months?
Difficult to say. I would say that at any point in time in the history, if you go back over 10 years, A year out, you really can't predict what will happen and when it's going Happened. So I don't know the answer. There are certainly some of those types of portfolios out there. It's whether or not they're going to trade, I don't know.
Okay. Are there any leading indicators that folks, the fragmented mom and pop market are suddenly being approached and Just staggering record prices where they're like, okay, this is as good as it gets. Is there any leading indicators that there's more willing sellers coming into the fold?
It's difficult to tell. I mean, it's really on a case by case basis and it's a very personal decision. I mean, they're making a decision. In many instances, they thought they were going to pass it along to their kids and that didn't work out or there's a lot of times health comes into it. And so I think it's a very personal decision.
We often thought that maybe Tax change may impact it or there may be other reasons impacting it and it kind of comes down to a very personal decision.
Okay. Last one for me. The 1,000 sites of expansion this year to 1200 in 2020, does that pace still keep building beyond that or is that 1,000 to 1200 site range a reasonable bedding line over the next 3 to 5 years?
I think when you we look out, we certainly have we have 5,000 vacant acres. So if you look out, it's probably in that range, maybe it goes up 1200 to 15 100 or something like that over the next few years, but that's effectively where we are and that's what we look at. We look at a 3 to 5 year
Okay. Thank you.
Thanks, John.
Our next question is from Nicholas Joseph of Citi. Your line is open.
Hey, it's Michael Bilerman here with Nick. I was wondering if you can, Marguerite, talk a little bit about the Marina business in the sense of climate change, rising water levels and how you sort of Underwrite that risk is your obviously buying for the long term, the business that certainly could be impacted by that?
Certainly. So we look at it and we'll look at what's happened in the past. And we'll also we also look to where the marinas that we purchased, What the view is on the climate change and the water impact in those areas. And we also will also look to whether or not there are marinas certainly these were coastal marinas, But there's marinas that are in lakes that will look to their what's happened with the lake levels and make a determination from there and look at the again the annual versus the transient basis that is generating the revenue. And in basis that is generating the revenue.
And how far in terms of the real estate that's adjacent to the Marina are you Looking to purchase, if any. I'm just wondering if Yes. I mean, if it's not to be able to control a site, improve the site, be able to draw more Folks, to the side of being owning more of the real estate around it?
Yes, so certainly. So where there's opportunities for Upland Purchases, we would be interested in that. And we'll also look at, marinas that are close in and around our communities. That helps from a customer standpoint and also helps from a human resource standpoint from our for our regional managers and our management teams.
And then if we think about the RV business, shipments are expected to be down pretty Significantly while still elevated. They're expected to be down this year, down to next year. I guess at what point Do you feel and I recognize there's a large installed base of RVers, but at some point, one would imagine that as The pace of sales comes down and declines that could impact certainly the transient side, but could start impacting Seasonal and annual. So how do you how much time are you spending on that? And is it a risk that we need to be conscious of?
Yes, we certainly look at it. I think last year, the industry saw an increase in RV sales of 4%. Year to date, there has been a decline in sales of 7%. Shipments are predicted to be down 17%, I think, for the year to 400,000. But really to put those numbers into perspective, From 2,009 to 2017, RV shipments have increased each year.
The previous high watermark was in 2,006, I believe, when there was about 400,000 shipments. So there really have been in excess of 400,000 shipments. So while the numbers are showing decline, they're really at historically high numbers. But for ELS, it's really our portfolio is comprised primarily of longer term customers. Our RV annual customers, they stay with us on average 10 years.
They've made the decision to kind of stay off the road and develop roots in our communities. And then the seasonal customers also committing for a longer term and they'll move into an annual in kind of the normal course of their life cycle. So our focus on the new RVers coming into the business, it's important, it's part of our transient business. It represents just roughly 5% of our overall revenue. But that for that business, we're really focused on, as you say, the $9,000,000 installed base.
And we view the new RVers as a they're really good marketing tool, but that funnel of existing RVers on the road is already a really healthy number. Think the ratio of available sites to RVs is very favorable for our business.
Right. Last question for me. Obviously rent control is a Big topic from a multifamily perspective across the U. S. I know you've dealt with it before, but There's just a lot more movement in a lot more states.
I guess, how are you thinking about that impacting your business where you've obviously been able to push rents Pretty significantly over the years for your product and look, I recognize the MH business is a more affordable product for People, but your land rents have moved up pretty dramatically over the last decade. So can you talk a little bit about how You're sort of evaluating the landscape today and where you stand?
Sure. Sure. So as you said, we've been operating in a rent control environment in For a long time, we have 23 properties that are subjected to mandated rent control. That's primarily in California. And so we've been very vocal in our opposition of rent control over the last 20 years.
We've won some cases and in others We are operating in the rent control environment and you see our results as a result of that rent control environment. So we're able to still generate Some very healthy growth rates even operating in that environment. But then beyond the actual strict rent control, There are states that have regulations around rent increases, like Florida, for instance. We operate under the terms of a prospectus, And that prospectus runs with the land and governs the annual rent increases. This actually continues to be an important selling point for our residents Considering to buy our properties, they we established a relationship with the homeowners associations and we spent time focused on meeting the needs of them of the residents and trying to achieve fair rent increases.
And so in general, in our communities where we have mandated rent control, We see a transfer of the economics from the landlord to the tenant. So where monthly rental rates are suppressed, But there is no governor of the sale price of the home and we've seen firsthand that that does not that rent control in our environment doesn't make the overall housing more They really shift the payment from the monthly site rent to a payment for the home. So We closely monitor all the activity for the states that we operate in and we're also working with our national association to make sure that our industry is represented. But it's kind of for us, it's more of the same. I know others are dealing with it kind of for the first time, but we've been dealing with it For a while now.
Great. Thanks.
Thanks, Michael.
Since we have no more questions on line. At this time, I would like to turn the call back over to Marguerite Nader for closing comments.
Thank you all very much. I look forward to updating you on next quarter's call.
Thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.