Greetings and welcome to the Empire State Realty Trust Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr.
Thomas Keltner, Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Empire State Realty Trust. Thank you. You may begin.
Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today for Empire State Realty Trust's Q2 2020 earnings conference call. In addition to the press release distributed yesterday, a quarterly supplemental package with further detail on our results and our latest investor presentation were posted in the Investors section of the company's website at empirestaterealtytrust.com. On today's call, management's prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward looking statements as defined in applicable securities laws, including those related to market conditions, property operations, capital expenditures, income and expense. As a reminder, forward looking statements represent management's current estimates.
They are subject to risks and uncertainties, including ongoing developments regarding the COVID-nineteen pandemic, which may cause actual results to differ from those discussed today. Empire State Realty Trust assumes no obligation to update any forward looking statement in the future. We encourage listeners to review the more detailed discussions related to these forward looking statements in the company's filings with the SEC. Certain of our disclosures today are added specifically in response to the SEC's direction on special additional disclosure due to the changes in our business prompted by the COVID-nineteen pandemic and are unique to this instruction. We do not expect to maintain the same level of disclosure when we resume normal business operations.
Finally, during today's call, we will discuss certain non GAAP financial measures such as FFO, modified and core FFO, NOI, cash NOI and EBITDA, which we believe are meaningful in evaluating the company's performance. Definitions and reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the earnings release and supplemental package, each available on the company's website. Now, I will turn the call over to Tony Malkin, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Thanks, Tom, and good afternoon to everyone. It takes a moment to grasp the magnitude of the dynamic situation we all have confronted and continue to confront since we last reported results. That we have adapted to the constant change, flexes, pivots and challenges as a new normal that our efforts to respond has been effective and that we are prepared to continue this way for an indeterminate period of time through the end of the pandemic are all testament to the team that is ESRT. We have made hard choices that have resulted in a great deal of change in our organization, reduction in force and cost and positioned us on our front feet to preserve and create value for our shareholders. I'd like to take a moment to say thank you to my colleague, John Kessler, and to extend to him once again my best wishes and those of our Board in his next endeavors.
Same time, the public welcome thanks and congratulations on a remarkable first three months to our new CFO, Christina Chiu, who has worked literally nonstop since her arrival and added a tremendous amount of value to ESRT and its stakeholders. We're all better from her contributions and will greatly benefit for years to come. Let me say clearly, I have a great deal of confidence in the future of New York City and the importance of office buildings, the teams and our current tenants and the tenants to come. We will create the value that will lead our economy forward and that the legions of young, smart, motivated individuals who have made that bin and are attracted to this great city will continue to come and make their market yet another reinvention of our American dream, a better, more compassionate and inclusive American dream. ESRT is committed to continue to change, be a part of that reinvention for the good of our city, its people and the economy.
That makes us the only capital of the world that is neither a capital of a state nor country. We can and we will. ESRT's leadership and innovation and redevelopment is our competitive edge. Our buildings and their unique combination of location, value and leadership and sustainability at indoor environmental quality have never been more necessary and have never had a better competitive edge. ESRT as a company has also undergone tremendous change and has never been better positioned for the future.
Here's a brief recap of what we have done, where we are and a look at where we will go. Our plan at our IPO was to modernize our properties for the 21st century, consolidate old spaces and redevelop them for new, bigger, better credit tenants on longer leases. We're going to lead in energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality sustainability. And we would maintain a strong, flexible balance sheet to execute our strategy and take advantage of potential opportunities that may arise. The redevelopment plan is largely completed.
We only have leasing of our remaining redeveloped space and a small amount of space left to redevelopment. Our 4 year redevelopment of the Observatory was completed in December 2019 to fantastic customer reviews and produced strong revenue growth in the 1st 2 months of 2020. We believe this long life investment will yield the best results in the future once tourism returns to normal, and we are thrilled amid uncertainty and challenges to have reopened the Observatory as of July 20. We avoided external growth at market peak pricing. We only commit stock repurchases when our stock price drops deeply, steered away from co working and other short term fads that are visible for what they are in this new environment.
We leased the tenants who filled the spaces they initially leased and then expanded by more than 1,700,000 square feet to date. As of the end of the quarter, we held $873,000,000 in cash on hand. We continued to engage in share repurchase activity at these depressed valuation levels. In the aggregate, we have purchased $119,000,000 of our common stock at a weighted average price of $8.67 per share through July 28, 2020 through a combination of open window purchases and an in place 10b5-1 program. We believe current shareholders will benefit long term from our purchases.
We finalized a series of management changes during the quarter as we, in close consultation with our Board, rolled out thoughtful plans for ESRT version 2.0. We laid out our plans to the Board in late 2018. As we can see, it was time for us to move from our plans at IPO into logical new areas of focus for ESRT with both new personnel and perspective. Let me briefly review some of the key new hires and appointments we made over this period. Suresh Rangarajan as our new Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Dana Robbins Snyder, our new Senior Vice President and Director of Energy and Sustainability Christina Chiu as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Aaron Ratner as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and an internal appointment of a Director of ESG.
Importantly, Aaron has hired 2 of the 3 additional team members we agreed during our discussions with him would position us to generate and evaluate opportunities and deploy capital for external growth focused on opportunities in which our balance sheet strength, buy and hold philosophy and redevelopment expertise can be brought to bear. We are in a marathon, not a sprint. We will deploy capital when an opportunity that will lead our growth in the next cycle presents itself. We anticipate opportunities will arise during the next 3 to 4 years in which we as omnivorous opportunivores will focus our potential to expand to create long term shareholder value. Our team has risen to all the challenges that have arisen from the COVID-nineteen pandemic as we pivot and flex our way through.
We have gone from a shelter in place environment to a return to the office in our Connecticut properties first, then to a phased implementation process in New York with the gradual return of our office and retail tenants. Our assets are well positioned for changing tenant demands on indoor environmental quality with the work we have done as part of our redevelopment efforts. We have met and will meet each challenge with our best organized plan and successful execution borne out of our experience with many different cycles. Strong balance sheet at hand, we have also undertaken a rigorous review of our cost structure. My experience through 6 crises in this business has led us to move prudently and swiftly to reduce operating costs, G and A, CapEx and headcount.
As disclosed in our earnings release and on Page 14 of the investor presentation in our first round of rationalization, we have undertaken cuts to reduce our 2020 general and administrative expenses by 12% to $60,000,000 Property operating expenses and building improvement capital expenditures have also been reduced and Tom Durels and Christina Chiu will go into more detail. Let me provide some highlights. We have implemented broad based corporate property level based salary reduction through year end effective August 1, starting at the top with my 33% reduction followed by Tom Durell's 25% reduction of scaling down from there. This is in addition to the salary reduction to $1 that I took in the Q2. Furthermore, we announced that upcoming 20 21 annual equity compensation will be reduced by $3,900,000 which consists of $2,700,000 for me and $1,200,000 for Tom Durell.
We have made permanent headcount reductions as well as instituted departmental budget cuts. This is in addition to COVID-nineteen related cost savings. We reduced property operating expenses by $10,000,000 in the 2nd quarter and expect further to reduce expenses by $12,000,000 in the second half of twenty twenty. We expect additional savings from a combination of staffing reductions and operational improvement. Furthermore, we reduced building improvement capital expenditures planned for 2020 by $24,000,000 relative to 2019 levels.
These broad based cost cuts are a start of our efforts to address the current environment, preserve the balance sheet and position ESRT in the long term to thrive and deliver shareholder value. I say start as we are not done. We will take additional measures to reduce costs further after we digest what we have put in place so far. We will see the bright shiny penny of work from home time us further in the post COVID environment. We share the belief with the vast majority of businesses that work from home diminishes productivity, team building and culture.
Companies that show up and build personal relationships and develop new products and services will always win. That said, we see the pandemic business environment in 4 phases. 1st, lockdown 2nd, post lockdown pre vaccine or cure 3rd, post vaccine or cure and 4th, cleanup and situation assessment. We are not naive about the current environment. There is no doubt that we will see economic challenges from higher unemployment levels and business failures.
We expect the current environment to continue to evolve, but we feel well prepared and ready to flex and pivot to handle whatever challenge lies ahead. That said, New York City is the greatest global economic and cultural capital and one to which people will return for work to live in and to visit. York City has come back time and time again from shocks, recessions and tough environment, stronger each time. We will have an opportunity to touch on these themes more in Q and A. And for now, I would like to turn the call over to my colleague and friend of 3 decades, Tom Guerrell.
Tom?
Thank you, Tony, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, I will comment on the following: our 2nd quarter leasing results, update on rent collections and rent approval requests, actions taken to reduce operating expenses and capital improvement costs, and our in place health and safety protocols. In the second quarter, we signed 19 new and renewal leases totaling approximately 113,000 square feet. This included approximately 52,000 square feet in our Manhattan office properties, 47,000 square feet in our Greater New York Metropolitan office properties and 14,000 square feet in our retail portfolio. The 2 most significant leases signed in the quarter were a 36,000 square foot office renewal lease with Ernst and Young at First Stamford Place and a 10,700 Square Foot Retail Renewal Lease with Charles Schwab at 1 Grand Central Place.
During the Q2, rental rates on new and renewal office leases across our entire portfolio were up 2.8% on a cash basis compared to the prior cash escalated rents. And at our Manhattan office properties, we signed new leases at a positive cash rent spread of 8.7%. Our total portfolio lease percentage is 89.6%, a decrease of 150 basis points from the prior quarter. Occupancy sequentially declined by 310 basis points during the Q2, mostly due to the anticipated move out of 2 large tenants that we previously announced and reflected on Page 9 of the supplemental from prior quarters. These include at the Empire State Building a 157,250 Square Foot Space, was intentionally vacated by Cody in connection with the previously announced expansion lease with LinkedIn, which will commence over 3 years as detailed in our signed lease not commenced schedule on Page 6 of the supplemental.
And Thomson Reuters' rated 49,00900 4 Square Feet at Metro Center as reflected on Page 9 of the supplemental in prior quarters. New leasing activity was impacted during the Q2 by the pandemic and shelter in place rules that were in effect for much of the period. During this time period, we instituted a number of online measures to maintain our relationships with brokers and expose our availabilities to the market. While physical tours resumed on June 22 and coincided with Phase 2 reopening, we expect lower leasing volumes for the 3rd and 4th quarters based upon current tenant demand. Moving to rent collections, we have made steady monthly improvements in our rent collections as shown on or in the table on Page 10 of our investor presentation.
We collected 84% of 2nd quarter 2020 total billings with 86% for office tenants and 75% for retail tenants. Through July 24, we collected 90% of July total billings with 93% for office tenants and 75% for retail tenants. These collection rates are before application of any security deposits and without any adjustment or deferral agreements. Deferral agreements to date have generally been for no more than 3 months of either rent or replenishment of securities deposit. For most of our local retail tenants who have been hit particularly hard, we will convert remaining 2020 fixed rents to a percentage rent structure when the payback of the difference between fixed and percentage rent over a defined period.
As shown on Page 6 of our supplemental, there is $42,000,000 of revenue upside by free rent burn off and signed leases not commenced. We resumed non essential construction on June 8th and have updated the timing of lease commencements, specifically the GAAP revenue component on Page 6 of the supplemental. As previously disclosed, we scaled back certain building operations, which will reduce costs until buildings are repopulated. These actions reduced property operating expenses by approximately $10,000,000 during the Q2 from the prior year period and will reduce operating expenses for the second half twenty twenty by approximately $12,000,000 The majority of these cost savings are COVID related and are expected to decline as physical occupancies increases. Keep in mind that a portion of the reduction in operating expenses will be offset by a reduction in tenant expense recoveries.
We have also implemented permanent cost savings actions of approximately $4,000,000 on an annualized basis from staffing and other reductions. Our buildings are fully open and we implemented the following health and safety protocols as detailed on Page 12 of our investor presentation, including temperature check, facial mask and sanitized cans required prior to building entry, mandatory masks in common areas, footprint details and signage in lobbies, elevator banks and elevators to encourage social distancing, hand sanitizer dispensers placed in common areas and increased cleaning of high touch points in common areas. Furthermore, we have a comprehensive indoor environmental quality program that is aligned with tenant requests and something that we have been consistently doing for years as part of our ongoing redevelopment work. This program includes first 13 filters in all air conditioning controlled by us, meet or exceed ASHRAE 62.1 standards, increased ventilation in which typical offices or outside air intake provides at least 1 air change per hour, regular air and water quality tests, thorough cleaning and disinfecting of air and water systems and active air purification in select spaces. As mentioned previously by Tony, we have taken action to reduce capital expenditures and we are near completion of our redevelopment work.
We now anticipate that 2020 capital expenditures for building improvements compared to 2019 will be approximately $24,000,000 lower as we focus on mandatory spending and work previously commenced. Now, I'll turn the call over to Christina.
Christina? Thanks, Tom. I'd like to begin by saying that I'm very excited about going ESRT in May of this year. Since then, I've worked closely with the various departments to ensure a smooth transition and to settle into this role. I met many of our investors and analysts virtually at NAREIT in June and look forward to meeting more of you over the coming months.
Now let me start with our quarterly results. For the Q2, we've reported core FFO of $39,000,000 or $0.14 per diluted share. This is net of $0.03 per share of expense from a reserve against tenant receivables and non cash production in straight line rent balances and excludes $3,000,000 in severance costs and a $4,000,000 impairment charge, both of which I will address later. Same store property operations, if you exclude one time lease termination fees and observatory results from the respective periods, yielded an 18% cash NOI increase from the Q2 of 2019. This increase was primarily driven by lower property operating expenses, partially offset by a reserve against tenant receivables.
When COVID related rent deferrals are excluded, same store property cash NOI increased 9.9% from the Q2 of 2019. More detail on rent deferrals and the breakdown of our collections can be found on Page 10 of the investor presentation. During the quarter, we recorded a number of unique items that are largely non cash and are add back to core FFO. Specifically, we recorded a $4,100,000 non cash impairment charge related to the write off of prior capitalized expenditures on a combined heat and power generation project for the Empire State Building that has been rendered economically unfaithful due to New York City's Local Law 97 and a $3,000,000 one time charge in G and A expenses related to the departure of our former COO, of which $2,700,000 is the non cash accelerated vesting of equity compensation. We also reported a $9,100,000 reduction in rental revenue in the Q2 comprised of a $1,900,000 reserve against tenant receivables and $7,200,000 against straight line rent balance.
This equates to 1.6 percent of our annualized rental revenue as of June 30, 2020 and a $0.03 FFO impact. We reached this determination after review of each tenant's arrear status, security deposit balance and management's assessment of the path towards a resolution and viability of the tenants. Turning to our balance sheet, as of June 30, 2020, the company had total debt outstanding of approximately $2,500,000,000 on a growth basis and $1,600,000,000 on a net basis. The company's total debt has a weighted average interest rate of 3.41 percent and a weighted average terms of maturity of 6.9 years. Our consolidated net debt to total market capitalization was 43.7% and consolidated net debt to EBITDA was 5.2 times.
We have no near term debt maturity at a well laddered maturity. Our revolving credit facility expires in August 2021 and has 2 6 months extension options. Our net maturity isn't until November 2024. As we look ahead to the second half of the year, here are a few items to keep in mind. We noted earlier that we undertook a series of proactive steps to reduce our G and A expenses, property operating expenses and capital expenditures.
Tom already covered property operating expenses and CapEx, so I will focus on G and A. We now anticipate 2020 expenses of $60,000,000 excluding one time severance charges. This is approximately 12% less than the previously disclosed G and A run rate of $68,000,000 that we provided on our 4Q 2019 earnings call. As detailed on Page 14 of the investor presentation, the reduction falls in 2 categories, named executive officer compensation and other corporate overhead. Named executive officer compensation reduction include $400,000 from the reduction in annual base salary for Tony Malkin and Tom Durels through December 31, 2020.
Dollars 1,200,000 from the change in age requirement from 60 to 65 for the accounting vesting period for time date equity compensation and $2,700,000 from the departure of our former COO. Other corporate overhead reductions include $1,500,000 of net savings from reductions in corporate staff and corporate salary reductions through December 31, 2020, partially offset by the addition of investment personnel and the balances from department budget cuts and lower anticipated spending due to COVID-nineteen. As mentioned by Tony earlier, 2021 NEO annual equity compensation will be reduced by $3,900,000 We currently expect 2021 G and A run rate of approximately $58,000,000 and we will continue to seek efficiencies and cost reduction opportunities in operating our business. We believe these proactive measures, particularly on G and A expenses are aligned with our stakeholders and reflect our efforts to preserve cash and operate efficiently in uncertain times. We will continue to seek the right balance as market conditions evolve.
Now, I'll turn the call over to Tony to provide some thoughts on our Observatory.
Tony? Thanks, Christina. Before we go to Q and A, here is an update on the Observatory now that we have reopened and the expense picture on a go forward basis. We started the year on a strong basis following the completion of our Observatory redevelopment program in the Q4 of 2019. Revenue for the 1st 2 months was up 13.2% year over year excluding the impact from the 100 and second floor observatory.
This revenue growth occurred despite the absence of Chinese New Year activity in January and a pullback in visitor traffic in March from European countries where COVID-nineteen was rampant. We followed the mandate of government authorities and closed the Observatory on March 16. And the Observatory remained closed for the entire second quarter. The 86th floor observatory reopened on July 20 with new protocols and processes under New York State Phase 4 guidelines. We still await permission to reopen the 102nd floor.
We have updated our hypothetical admissions ramp up on Page 18 of our investor presentation. It assumes 2019 monthly levels as the baseline visitation comparison reference point and uses our reopening date of July 20 with a gradual ramp up towards normalized levels by 2022. We have been open for just under 2 weeks now and slowly rebuild the beach that is our business one grain of sand at a time. Our focus on indoor and bio level quality in which we have been leaders for more than decade yielded air filtration through MERV 13 filters, an aggressive response to viruses with atmosphere and a massive capacity to ventilate the Observatory as part of our redevelopment. Combined with comprehensive protocols and employee training, this has made it possible to reopen.
Our expectations for a more gradual ramp up aligned with our channel checks with other Observatory operations around the world, which have seen to date a gradual volume buildup as they reopen in their respective countries to a 20% to 25% level of prior year's operation. We are confirmed in our anticipation initially that we will have a higher local visitor mix followed by a ramp up of regionally and nationally sourced travel and then followed by a restoration of our typical visitor mix that is approximately 2 thirds international. We do not think we will achieve normalization until the broad resumption of international air travel and we presently peg that for sometime in 2022. While the Observatory was closed, we remained relevant and active in the promotion of our brand through numerous initiatives from our pandemic siren lighting over the skyline of New York City to our partnership on the 4th July with Macy's fireworks finale with fireworks shot off the top of the Empire State Building. If you missed it, take a moment and look at our YouTube channel.
You will be impressed and entertained. With our July 20 reopening, we posted a detailed presentation to educate the general public that we are open for business and ready to welcome visitors in a safe and enjoyable environment and since launched a social media push. Though attraction in any city has higher brand value and international recognition than the Empire State Building Observatory, authentic and iconic. We believe when the pandemic passes, we will emerge stronger than ever and remain the brand and icon of New York City. On the expense side, we wanted to share an update on how to think about expenses as we reopen.
Previously, we had communicated that we reduced our typical annualized expense run rate by 60% from $35,000,000 in February to $14,000,000 by May. In the Q2, Observatory expenses totaled $4,000,000 Now that we have reopened, we calculate our annualized expense run rate to approximately $25,500,000 There are certain fixed staffing and operational costs regardless of volume level. For example, we need to maintain staffing to operate the will call desk, security, elevator loading, unloading and deck attendance regardless of whether we have 1 or 1,000 visitors at a time. We believe that we have ample bandwidth to handle our anticipated ramp up in admission volume through 60% of 2019 volume levels with current staffing. With this completed, I'd like to open the call for your questions.
Keep the call moving. As always, we ask that each participant limit him or herself to one primary question and one follow-up. Please do feel free to rejoin the queue if you have additional questions. We will stay on the call as long as we have questions. Operator?
Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. Our first question has come from the line of Craig Mailman of KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Hey, good afternoon. Tony, I appreciate your comments at the beginning of the call and kind of the long term conviction in New York City. But just a question here on recently you've seen some livability issues and quality of life issues that hopefully could reverse itself, but who knows how long it lasts. I mean, at this point, as you guys are ramping your investment team and broadening that out, I mean, is there any thought process on moving beyond just the New York metro area and looking at other markets within the U. S.
That could potentially be a good area to deploy capital?
Thanks very much for the question. Appreciate it.
We really view ourselves as omnivorous opportunivores. And at this early point, in what I view as a 3 to 4 year opportunity, I really don't want to limit our options on anything. That said, we certainly have certain skills in New York City. I've lived through times of much greater livability challenges than we presently have in New York. And the fact is, every dollar of capital that we have, we have to patiently and prudently evaluate all our options to look at a focus of how we generate shareholder value.
So, while I would like to say that it's very straightforward, I think there are some things which obviously would fit in with us clearly and comfortably and there are other things candidly which might be out of the box and we just have to look at it all against how we use our capital, anything from buying our own stock to buying debt, joint venturing, different product types, different locations.
That's helpful. And then just on the retail portfolio, you guys have 17% of rents coming from that segment. As you guys are looking at the creditworthiness of those tenants, and I realize a lot of it's sort of amenity based, What's the viability even with going to percentage rents of the majority of those tenants here as the pandemic kind of drags on and restaurant reopenings kind of keep getting kicked down the road?
Well, I absolutely think that when it comes to foodservice, there are specific challenges. We need the bodies in the buildings in order to justify people and their activities. And as far as in store dining, that's challenged by the fact that frankly people need to deploy the protocols that we have in our spaces, including our retail of MERV 13 filters, atmosphere and fresh air ventilation. That said, I think that we'll see people pivot and flex. We are at percentage rent.
If people aren't open and they're not doing sales, that means their rent is 0. And I think over time, our strong credits, our strong tenants, those rents are in the bag and those people have long term views. We may see failures in the smaller amenity based tenants. And as people return to the offices, which they will, those people will either restart with new businesses or we'll have other folks come in. We'll see a downward adjustment in rental pricing.
And I think as far as retail in New York is concerned, there are certain very large boxes that have been occupied by tenants that won't be in business anymore that are permanently disabled and need to be redeveloped. And I think that there are certain areas geographically where retailers went or folks open because that's where they could afford it and they won't have a lot of business to do there and they'll be able to get in better locations more centrally located at better rents due to the free up of space. Great. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Bilerman of Citi. Please proceed with your question. Yes.
Good morning. Tony, just staying on external growth, I think the way you sort of frame the sort of 3 to 4 year opportunity seems to be a slower cadence than the excitement that you shared on the last quarter's call, which seemed coming to a fork in the road and taking it, it seemed a little bit more nearer term in terms of deploying that capital. Is that fair?
So I think, Michael, the big excitement for us is actually the fork in the road. We look at everything in a long pathway. I think that decisions in real estate that are successful for long term value creation have to last a cycle, have to endure a cycle. We are not saying that it's between years 3 4 that these opportunities will present themselves, merely saying that I think we'll go into a dip in which pricing inefficiency will at first kick off and then we will be able to see perhaps better pricing efficiency as more transactions take place. But then we will also have to deal with the recovery in the marketplace in general.
And I think that as we've seen in most cycles, that creates a buying opportunity that lasts anywhere from 3 to 4 years to recycle. And you're really at the beginning of a downturn, through the downturn of the beginning of a new cycle, have a broad number of months in which to deploy capital. That doesn't mean that we are not active, and I'm just thrilled with Aaron and what he has done. He's already got 2 of the 3 hires that he wanted to put in place selected. 1 has been working with us for over a month now.
And we are looking at just a tremendous number of different opportunities, including a couple of transactions where frankly we didn't participate or we had our hair taken off as the trucks carrying the money to the closing deal drove by at high speed. And that we're now able to look at the senior debt and other pieces and say there are opportunities to reenter things we've already underwritten. So hopefully that's helpful. If not, please just press further and I'll try to respond more clearly.
Yes. No, that's helpful color to have. And I know you acted on the stock buyback again during the quarter. How does where the stock is trading affect your decision to deploy capital in anything, whether it's debt, whether it's an asset in New York, outside of New York? I guess, how does what is the reference that you and the Board and the rest of the management team goes through in terms of because once it's gone, it's gone.
Once you've spent that money, you don't have it anymore. So how do you sort of manage that side given your stock is severely depressed levels?
So, great question. Thank you. I think there's an important footnote to all of our thinking when it comes to our cash. We look at capital allocation very carefully. I don't care if it's when we look at new deals that we might be working on right now compared to how we would use that money in everything from stock buyback to dividend to external reinvestment to where we see things panning out in the cycle.
That's part 1. Part 2, we also do have a fantastic partner in the Qatar Investment Authority, who has repeatedly reinforced its willingness to participate with us in opportunities, which we think are worthwhile. And one of the things that I like about the fact that we brought on Aaron Ratner is his prior experience with joint ventures, his prior experience and work with institutional capital other than just his own at TPG. So we look at our capital as capital that can be levered by other people's capital, where we have an opportunity to deploy not just capital, but to use our own expertise. And I think that as we perform, as we continue to differentiate ourselves in our own unique ways, Candidly, I think the stock price will improve.
But we always have the opportunity to address things with joint ventures and we use our money as seed capital for bigger moves. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question has come from the line of James Feldman of Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.
Good afternoon. This is Elvis on for Jamie. Tony and maybe Christina, can you talk a little bit about sort of the lingering credit risks writedowns that not only that occurred in the quarter, but could potentially occur in the future? How should we be thinking about your portfolio versus some of the other write downs that we've seen across the sector?
Well, I'll take the first crack at this and hand this off to Christina. We can only write off rents that are actually owed to us and not paid. And at that point, we'll take a look at that cash component, then also go to the straight line component. So we have very, very actively engaged on our request for deferrals on our tenants who have not paid. As you can see, we've made really good progress on our rent collections.
And I think that this is performing without a net. It's a live fire exercise. I wouldn't even say it's an exercise. We are as I said last quarter, we are at war. This is the nature of things.
I think that as far as what we look at coming forward, I would throw that over Christina just to talk about how she has looked at this and worked with the folks in her area and in leasing and on the real estate side as we assess our collections.
Sure. So when we I might refer you to Page 10, which we put together. It's our total billings collection update. And notably, we show month by month and it all adds up to 100 on an unadjusted basis. And I note that to answer your question because this represents the work we do in determining write offs and collectability And we perform a rigorous exercise to evaluate each tenant's arrear status sitting down with accounts receivable, with the leasing team.
And what we're looking for is how much in arrears, what's the pattern, what's the security deposit balance, is it sufficient to cover those balances, what's management's assessment of a tax or is a resolution in getting uncollected amounts paid? And what's the viability of the tenant, at the end of the day? And based on that, that's how we arrived at the $9,100,000 that we wrote down of which $1,900,000 represents the uncollected tenant balances and we have to watch out for those. The straight line is the other portion and we'll continue to look at that. Within the chart, if you take a look, we do see improvement.
So in July, we've reached 90% in straight collection, again, completely unadjusted. And we have a basket that's uncollected, but covered by security deposit, and then another basket of uncollected. So we are seeing improvement. And as the period goes on, we'll continue to use these categories to assess very carefully and certainly we'll take write downs as we see that the viability of payback is not
there. Okay. Thanks. And then maybe one for Tom. Tom, you mentioned on the call having lower expenses, but also having lower recoveries.
Some of the beats have been on lower expenses, but how does that look sort of within the quarter versus future quarters in thinking about these lower expenses versus collecting lower recoveries for tenants? How should we
be thinking about that?
Well, as I commented earlier, in the second half of twenty twenty compared to second half twenty nineteen, we expect to reduce operating expenses by $12,000,000 And then on a go forward basis in 2021, we eliminated $4,000,000 of recurring staffing and other expenses. So these are unrelated to COVID and these are permanent reductions. A percentage of our expenses will be recovered by operating expense escalations. But as we reduce those expenses going forward, then you'll see some decrease in operating expense escalations. We haven't given a specific number, but it's not 100%, but a portion of those expense reductions.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Craig Lee of BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, good afternoon. It's been just over a week since the inventory reopened. Just curious how has the visitor traffic been so far? And are you considering any possible changes in pricing either more premium or conversely possibly promotions to attract more visitors?
All right. Thanks for that question. Tony here. Look, we are we will not disclose in this call any specific numbers, but we're comfortable to say that our visitor numbers align with our expectations. They are also consistent with the reopening pass that other tower operators around the world with whom we regularly compare notes have experienced.
Most of these people are seeing internal travel that they're seeing to people who travel by cars largely for day trips. After a few months of operations, they have gotten to the 20 percent to 25% range. So from that perspective, it's pretty much in line. We have not changed our ticket pricing. We don't anticipate to change our ticket pricing.
We have received fantastic results on social from our visitors who've come through. The 5 star, interesting and understandably, focused on safety first, then the spectacular view and the experience second. So I think we will see these reviews and we have seen these reviews encourage others to venture forth. Week 2 is stronger than week 1. Our first weekend was stronger than our week prior.
So we look forward to this weekend upcoming. And we also think that over time, recognize that right now basically almost all of our sales are direct from our website. As ancillary New York City attractions reopen, such as museums like The Met or the 911 Museum, and there's more of a promotion for New York City as a destination, our past partner and online travel agency partners will have more products to sell. So right now, the interesting thing is that our per caps are actually quite high because virtually everybody has purchased a ticket directly from us online. Hopefully, this is helpful.
Let me know if you have any further questions.
Yes. No, that was helpful.
And then just a follow-up on that. In your hypothetical Observatory assumptions, when do you expect or which quarter to increase the 500 capacity level?
So the 500 capacity level was an arbitrary number that we set. Under Phase 4, we have opened under as an outside attraction. That's why the 100 and second floor is not open at this time, only the 86th floor is open at this time. So that said, we can flex up to a bigger number based on demand and we can flex to a bigger number, Frankly, when we are comfortable that all of the protocols that we have put in place are well observed by our visitors and well enforced by our team, who went through the team went through 3 or 4 days of training before we reopened. So we're very conscious that we've been fortunate in the extensive review that was given to us by both the Governor's office and the Mayor's office that both of them agreed that we are in a good position to reopen.
We want to demonstrate we can do exactly what we said we would do, that we can maintain the appropriate protocols as we set them out. And we'll work closely and carefully and advise them before we do anything further as far as increasing our capacity.
Thank you. Our next question has come from the line of Daniel Ishmael of Green Street Advisors. Please proceed with your question.
Great. Thank you. Tony, I was hoping if you can speak to maybe the type of demand you're seeing, albeit with the understanding that demand is lower now because of the post COVID environment we're in. But if you could just speak to the suburbs versus the city and the type of tenants that are looking in both areas and if you've noticed an acceleration out to the birds?
Look, I think the comforting news for us is that we actually have seen tours. We have active proposals. We have some approved deals. But for the actual detail as to from where it comes and where it's headed, why don't I hand this over to Tom Durels for him to make comment?
Sure. Thanks, Tony. Lease tours have resumed in Manhattan, as Tony commented, on a comparative basis for the month of July in 2020 compared to 2019 tour volumes, we're at about 40%. Bear in mind that we're the Phase 2 opening in Manhattan was June 22. So we're not too many weeks following the Phase 2 opening.
But we are pleased that the tours have resumed and we're running at about a 40% pace. As Tony just mentioned, we've received some recent proposals both for full floors at 111, West 33rd Street and an Empire State Building and prebuilts where we have them at 1350 Broadway, Empire State Building and at 1 Grand Central Place. And then for what we saw is releases that were in negotiation before the shelter in place orders. A few of those have been executed and that showed up in our second quarter numbers, a few more that we still remain in negotiation. We hope to get those closed and then some deals died.
I would say that we do expect lower leasing volumes for the Q3 particularly. Bear in mind, we're pretty much shut down for tours for the entire period where the shelter in place orders were in effect. But we're pleased that tours have resumed. And then I think also you did ask about tenant. Yes, just the tenant side.
I can't say that there's one particular tenant. We have seen a good amount of activity in the fire sector, some health care, professional services and the like. It's fairly broad based, not necessarily focused on one specific industry.
Great. That's helpful. And then maybe just on the write off at the Empire State Building regarding the capital improvement project. I believe Local Law 97 was passed last year and I was just curious if you can provide any more color on what made that project uneconomical and if there's anything else that's being done at other properties you guys have?
So that was the only project on which we had an actual combined heat power project put together. It made very good economic sense. We had worked with the Governor's office to get an exemption for a pilot program to look at the Con Ed standby tariff rates that previously would have made it uneconomic. We feel very strongly that even from an environmental perspective, it makes a great deal of sense because the efficiency is extraordinarily high in the recapture of waste heat for steam for the chillers and hot water for the building, really tremendously high efficiency. The issue is in Local Law 97 and I am the sole real estate industry representative on the Mayor's Advisory Board for the implementation of Local Law 97 is that there have been some arbitrary values set for greenhouse gas emission coefficients.
And the result of that is that we cannot see a clear pathway under the current rules that the assessment charged for greenhouse gas emissions for a combined heat and power plant will be economical because they add a very significant charge each year for operation. So if we can restructure this, we will. I am, as I mentioned, actively involved with the Mayor's Advisory Board on the implementation of the law. 1 of the things which we will attempt to speak to is how actually to measure the greenhouse gas coefficient of combined heat power plant. However, Christina, on arrival and in review of this said, look, the way things are presently set and based on the fact that the rules as they are currently set, the levels as they're currently set, they render it uneconomic.
It's the logical time to expense.
Is it your sense that most building owners or I should say office building owners in New York City might seek to offset some of those risks by looking at the carbon tax credits as some of these peers are done?
So look, this is a much bigger subject. I'll just say that there is a lot of work that needs to be done on this. There are limitations as to what you can do on carbon tax credits. There are there's a lot to be sorted through. This was an ideologically positive, I think, move.
However, it's not a very well thought out bill on many levels. And to the extent that we can be helpful with the city, which is our goal and the goal of everybody is on the advisory board to improve the current situation, we will. But we have to be conscious of with what we're dealing. And so with that in mind, we took the write down that we did.
Great. Thanks, everyone.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Craig Mailman of KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Hey, guys. Just a follow-up here. As you think about the OpEx savings and kind of just looking at
the fiscal kind
of outlook for the city. I mean, how much of this could just be eaten up by higher taxes as we head into 'twenty one, 'twenty two
property taxes? Certainly a risk, Craig. Certainly a risk. So I think that one of the reasons that we need to be careful to Michael's earlier question about how we look at underwriting our opportunity set, got to take a look at what happens on the fiscal scene. Every city in the United States, not just New York City, has been tremendously adversely impacted by the COVID pandemic.
I think the good news is candidly, there's a lot of fat in the New York City budget. During the de Blasio administration, there had been significant increases in a lot of programs, creations of new programs, which are ideologically and I think directionally logical. However, when it really comes down to what makes a difference to deliver services to allow the city to function, there's a lot of fat that could be cut. And I think it's important to note that this Mayor and this City Council, 2 thirds of the City Council will be gone as of the next election cycle in 2021. Everybody's term limited out.
So it's going to be a very interesting set of developments, I think, as we go forward. And it's one where I think we just need to be careful when we look at committing new capital.
And then just on the CapEx savings you guys have, it sounds like some deferred R and M. I mean, how much of that's just going to land in 'twenty one? Is this kind of the timing decision there just because some of that could be passed through the tenants? And you want to make sure people are in the space to be able to pass it through? Or is
some of that permanently avoidable? Tom?
Sure. Craig, this is Tom. As we've commented, we're nearing the end of our redevelopment program, and so we're seeing the benefit of that. We had anticipated a decline in our CapEx spend going into 2020, but certainly during this environment, we took a look at everything. We've deferred those things where we can get more life out of equipment or systems and we're focusing on executing and completing the work that we had commenced pre COVID and we're prioritizing only those things that are going to generate income.
But the big picture is that we're nearing the end of our redevelopment. And so, I think we're in good shape. I'm pleased with the reductions. We're closing out a lot of work at the Empire State Building and throughout the portfolio, and that's where we're trying to wrap up this year.
Great. Thank you.
There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Malkin for any closing comments.
Okay. Operator, thank you very much. Thank you very much to everybody else on the call. Clearly, we did this all right. We are socially We didn't all fit in one conference room.
So but I think hats off to the team, we pulled it off. All that being said, I think I'd just like to thank everyone for the time and effort put into the disclosures this quarter more detailed specifically than normal. However, we think it's good and helpful to you folks to be able to analyze and underwrite it. Please remember that forward looking statements on plans to ramp up the Observatory and return to business are really for discussion purposes only. They're not guidance that we will have to pivot and flex depending upon what happens with travel and with COVID pandemic.
Switching gears, I want to express on behalf of the Board and myself the gratitude and appreciation we have for the hard work of all the SRTs employees during this time. Our team has continued to approach the business with calm mindsets. We've got a smart work can do experience and resilience that will carry us through these times. Our balance sheet and proactive cost saving measures will position us well for what lies ahead. The fact is, we've had to say sad goodbyes to team members who have been impacted by a reduction in force to date.
People have had to tolerate some tough news with regard to compensation reduction. And we have another phase, as has been mentioned, of cost examination and reduction to do after these costs settle in. So we look forward to the chance to meet, see many of you virtually either through roadshows or conferences in the months ahead. And we look forward to the opportunity to share our Q3 results in October. Until then, please stay safe and onward and upward folks.