Morning, welcome to the Fluor Corporation 3Q 2020 earnings conference call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow management's presentation. A replay of today's conference will be available at approximately 10:30 A.M. Eastern Time today, accessible on Fluor's website at investor.fluor.com. The web replay will be available for 30 days. A telephone replay will also be available for seven days through a registration link, also accessible on Fluor's website at investor.fluor.com. At this time, for opening remarks, I would like to turn the call over to Jason Landkamer, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Jason Landkamer.
Thank you, operator, welcome to Fluor's third quarter 2020 conference call. With us today are Alan Boeckmann, Fluor's Executive Chairman, Carlos Hernandez, Fluor's Chief Executive Officer, and Joe Brennan, Fluor's Chief Financial Officer. We released our earnings statement earlier this morning, we are streaming a slide presentation on our website, which we will reference while making prepared remarks. Before getting started, I'd like to refer you to our safe harbor note regarding forward-looking statements, which is summarized on slide one. During today's presentation, we'll be making forward-looking statements which reflect our current analysis of existing trends and information. There is an inherent risk that actual results and experience could differ materially. You can find a discussion of our risk factors, which could potentially contribute to such differences, in the company's Form 10-Q filed earlier today. During this call, we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures.
Reconciliations of these amounts to the comparable GAAP measures are reflected in our earnings release and posted in the investor relations section of our website at investor.fluor.com. I'll now turn the call over to Carlos Hernandez, Fluor's Chief Executive Officer. Carlos?
Thanks, Jason, and good morning, everyone. It's great to be talking with all of you again, and I'm pleased to report that with this morning's 10-Q filing, Fluor is now current with its financials. Our team around the world has worked tirelessly over the last several months to get us to this point, and we are proud and grateful for their diligence and hard work. We look forward to speaking with the investment community on a more regular and consistent cadence going forward, and we thank you for your patience as we confronted [audio distortion] the challenges of 2020. Moving to slide two. I'd like to start by providing an update on the effects of the pandemic on our operations.
As we'll discuss in greater detail, since we last spoke, we have seen our projects continue to come back online and recover from the initial rounds of regulatory lockdowns and COVID cases. We are monitoring restrictions in various states and countries with rising cases, and we'll keep you updated on any major impacts to our business that we might see. Over 75% of our offices are open and operating at a reduced level of operations, with the remaining offices still closed. We can flex the level of personnel at our offices as local restrictions and community spread of the virus changes. Only about 7% of our projects are closed, with the rest operating at normal, intermediate, or limited capacity. We continue to engage with our clients on how to proceed successfully and safely, and have provided notices asserting our rights under change of law and force majeure provision.
We remain committed to the health and safety of our employees and communities where we work. We have launched new procedures, training, and communications packages to help transition our people back to work safely and finish the year strong. We are proactively ensuring our people have the mental and physical support they need to remain resilient and keep our business moving forward. Despite the impact of COVID, we see a number of positive developments across the company. The majority of our projects have continued to safely and successfully progress in the field. The projects we identified as problem projects last year have been holding to their revised cost forecasts and schedules. There were no significant charges incurred in the third quarter.
Before handing the call over to Joe for a financial update, I'd like to provide you a high-level outlook of what's going on in our various business segments and some specific project commentary. Turning to slide three. In Energy & Chemicals, the segment continues to make progress on executing its backlog in a pandemic-constrained environment. However, we continue to hear from a number of our oil and gas clients that they expect to have reduced capital spending plans over the next few years. We believe that our clients will focus on advantaged, high-value projects that can generate returns in a weak commodity price environment. While we do see a pipeline of projects, we will only pursue the ones that fit our revised criteria as we focus on delivering consistent profitability. On TCO, remobilization continues as the COVID situation in Tengiz and western Kazakhstan has improved.
We have successfully increased the project population to over 15,000 in Q3 and plan to remobilize the project to 20,000 by the end of 2020. As of today, we are at over 19,000. In October, the project completed the final sealift module delivery for the project on plan. This represents a tremendous accomplishment during the current pandemic and eliminates a high-profile project risk. The Fluor-led JV is 98% complete with engineering and construction, and Tengizchevroil is over 50% complete. Major construction activities include setting modules on foundations, completion of metering stations, and continued completion of power and control scopes. In Kuwait, Fluor has started pumping to the Al-Zour refinery ahead of commissioning. When complete, this will be one of the world's largest oil refining facilities. Finally, our offshore project work continues, and we are still planning to complete the fabrication and pre-commissioning work in 2021.
Ongoing COVID impacts and travel restrictions in China are hampering the progress, but mitigation actions are being taken. Moving to slide four. Up in Kitimat, progress continues to be made on the LNG Canada project despite the ongoing challenges presented by the government-imposed restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our engineering deliverables are being produced in various global operating centers for the Inside Battery Limits and Outside Battery Limits scope to keep pace with our COVID-19-impacted schedules for the fabrication yards and construction site. The site activities are progressing while maintaining all COVID-19 recommended and required measures and mitigations. The site preparation and piling work for train one is complete, and train two is well underway. The module offloading facility, haul road, and bridges required to transfer the modules to site will be ready in advance of receiving the first module in 2021.
Pile cap and concrete foundations placement and paving has started for train one. Though we continue to work on-site, the priority continues to be the safety and wellbeing of our people. Now to slide five. Moving on to our mining and industrial segment. Given the ongoing pandemic and the commodity price fluctuations, we have seen a lot of the large mining projects we were expecting to be awarded in 2020 and 2021 get delayed. We are well-positioned to win these projects when our clients are ready to proceed. Revenue and segment profits were negatively impacted as execution activities were deferred on a few large mining projects due to the COVID-19 pandemic. I am pleased to say that over the past month, we have started to see these projects be mobilized and expect to see revenues follow suit as they get fully back online.
In our Advanced Technologies & Life Sciences business, we completed the Novo Nordisk project in North Carolina in the third quarter. New awards for the quarter include a cell-based influenza vaccine manufacturing facility in Australia. Now turning to slide six. Infrastructure margins reflect execution on a few zero-margin projects in our backlog. However, we are continuing moving these projects forward and should start to see some relief in our margins as these projects wrap up later this year and into 2021. This quarter, our infrastructure segment booked the Oak Hill Parkway highway project in Austin for the Texas Department of Transportation. This project is another example of our focus on the Texas infrastructure market and is a testament to the value that TxDOT places on our services.
As we have previously discussed, in the third quarter, we terminated our contract with the Maryland Department of Transportation for the Purple Line project. This project has now been removed from our backlog. In November, the Maryland Department of Transportation reached a $250 million agreement in principle with the consortium to settle all of the consortium's outstanding claims. Although this agreement is subject to approval by the Maryland Board of Public Works, it will result in Fluor and its joint venture partners avoiding additional project costs. Turning to slide seven. In government, third quarter reflects the return to a near normal results driven by solid performance and active management of work levels despite the global pandemic compared to the second quarter. This was achieved across the government group with the largest increases at Strategic Petroleum Reserve, Portsmouth, and Savannah River.
In diversified services, reduced business volumes as a result of COVID-19 continued to impact results in the third quarter. Over the past two months, we have started to see volumes increasing after lockdown restrictions lifted, especially in Europe and Latin America. In the third quarter, we also divested EQIN, Fluor's professional equipment rental business in Europe. Now moving to our other segment on slide eight. This segment includes the fixed-price Radford and Warren projects that were previously part of the government segment, as well as our NuScale initiative. The margin forecast for the Radford and Warren projects continue to remain relatively flat. The Radford project is nearly complete, with the site teams rapidly working off punch list items. The water trials have been successful, and the project has made substantial progress in turning over subsystems to the client.
Full turnover of all systems and effective site demobilization is expected early next year. Warren has had an effective construction campaign through the summer and fall weather window, overcoming early design complications and making substantial progress with early structural work. The project successfully negotiated an extension of time order with the client mitigating the risk of schedule damages. To date, impacts from COVID have been relatively modest, and schedule impacts have been effectively mitigated. In August, we announced that NuScale received final design certification by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This approval establishes NuScale as the preeminent leader in the small modular reactor technology market and allows Fluor to respond to customers looking for a unique, flexible, safe, and carbon-free energy solution. Since that approval, we have seen an increase in interest from potential customers, capital investors, manufacturers, and supply chain partners to move forward in our development efforts.
Fluor is pleased to support NuScale's efforts in creating a carbon-free power solution, and we look forward to discussing our opportunities in the near future. Now I'll turn the call over to Joe to provide a financial update. Joe Brennan?
Thanks, Carlos, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with a financial update on slide nine. In the third quarter, we recorded revenue of $3.8 billion, down slightly from Q2, and earnings from continuing operations attributable to Fluor of $19.1 million or $0.14 per share. Results for the quarter include $30 million of foreign currency transaction losses, $22 million of NuScale expenses, and $19 million of internal investigation expenses. In regards to NuScale, while we previously stated 2020 expenses would be fully funded by investors, investment decision delays due to the pandemic have required Fluor to provide $15 million of the funding in the third quarter. Our overall segment profit margin of 3.4% for the quarter is evidence of the work we have done over the last 18 months to stabilize the business.
We saw the strong performance across our business lines this quarter and have not taken any material project execution charges in the first three quarters of 2020. Specifically, in energy and chemicals, it's important to note that our higher than normal operating margins for Q3 do not properly represent our performance in the quarter. Although we did see increased project execution activity on our LNG project, the effects of COVID and normal project adjustments were reflected in Q1 because of our delayed reporting schedule this year. Results for the segment also benefited from favorable FX. Thus, looking at the business line from a year-to-date perspective provides a better picture of our performance in that segment. Corporate G&A expenses in the quarter were $68 million.
Most foreign currencies strengthened against the U.S. dollar in the quarter, resulting in the previously mentioned foreign currency loss of $30 million, which is driving up the corporate G&A expense. G&A also reflects $19 million of investigation expenses. Moving to slide 10, our cash balance at the end of the third quarter was $2.1 billion, with 36% of that domestically available for use. Our operating cash flow for the quarter was $80 million, with free cash flow of $58 million. Moving to capital structure and liquidity, we continue to believe that we have ample liquidity to meet the demands of current projects and future prospects. As Carlos mentioned with today's filing, we are now current with all financial filings and debt requirements. Furthermore, we continue to have extensive and ongoing communications with our banking community.
Before giving you some general comments about the fourth quarter and 2021, I wanted to provide a quick update on the sale of our AMECO equipment rental business. While this sale is still progressing, the pandemic has slowed progress on getting this transacted. We now anticipate that we will divest this business in the first half of 2021. In the third quarter, we sold substantially all of our assets of our AMECO business for $18 million net of working capital and recognized a loss of $1 million. You can see this reflected in this quarter's results from discontinued operations. Turning to slide 11. While we are not planning to provide 2021 guidance until our year-end earnings call in February, I would like to point out a few items as we close out the fourth quarter and move into quarter one.
As we stand today, our cash balance is north of $2 billion, and we expect to maintain cash at this level through the end of the year. Our cash balance is roughly equivalent to where we stood at the end of 2019. Thus, we have been able to fund our loss projects through the year while maintaining strong liquidity. Our non-cash compensation expense in the fourth quarter will reflect the delayed filing of the 10-K and will increase our G&A expense for the quarter. For our loss projects, we have approximately $100 million left to fund in the fourth quarter, and then a marginal impact beyond this year. As a reminder, because these projects have been written down to zero margin, they continue to reduce our overall margins since revenue and cost are recognized on a dollar-for-dollar basis. This is particularly evident when you look at the infrastructure segment.
We expect to see margins increase as we wrap up these projects and are working through a healthier backlog. Finally, we continue to see a COVID impact on our business. Several of our larger clients are slowing work to ensure they can meet their year-end cash flow obligation. Additionally, the pandemic continues to impede our ability to staff projects. As we think about 2021, we will be starting from a lower backlog as we have worked down our existing backlog with much lower awards replacing them this year. This is especially apparent in oil and gas, and we will see a shift towards other business units until some of our larger clients feel comfortable reinvesting capital. Before we open the line for questions, I'd like to turn the call over to Alan Boeckmann, Fluor's Executive Chairman, to provide some remarks on our upcoming Chief Executive Officer transition. Alan?
Thank you, Joe. I'll now ask you to move to slide 12. I'd like to start this morning by saying a few words about Carlos Hernandez. It has been my absolute privilege to get to work alongside Carlos since he came into the company in 2007, but more specifically, over the last 19 months. Carlos took over this company and quickly got to work stabilizing our business and positioning the company for growth going forward. His hallmark has to be always promoting a culture of transparency and accountability, and the changes he put in place have quickly filtered across the company. The revised pursuit criteria that Carlos enacted has significantly reduced the risk in our backlog and has allowed our sales teams to focus on high-quality projects where we can be profitable and successful.
Additionally, I think it's important to note even again in this call that Fluor has not taken any significant project charges in the last nine months. We have also maintained strong liquidity and have completed a very detailed investigation. All of this is a testament to Carlos' focus on risk assessment, transparency, and accountability. The changes he made in this company were necessary to set us up for the next chapter, and we are truly thankful for his contribution and wish him well in his much-deserved retirement. I'd like to now speak a bit about the CEO succession. As Carlos has put us on a stable operating platform, the board recognized that it was time for the succession to allow us to move forward with a CEO that will own the forward strategy for the next timeframe.
Therefore, on January 1st, David Constable will return to Fluor as our Chief Executive Officer. David held various leadership positions at Fluor from 1982 to 2011 and has also been a member of our board since 2019. He has a deep understanding of our operations and opportunities and has a particular focus on effective risk management. I speak on behalf of the board when we say we fully support this appointment for the CEO position and are confident he is the right person to lead our company. I know that some of you remember David when he was last with the company, and he is looking forward to reconnecting and with the rest of the investment community soon. As previously mentioned, we are planning a strategy day in early January 2021.
At that time, you will all get a chance to hear from David and the management team about their priorities and the actions that will move this company forward in 2021 and beyond. Now with that, operator, we will open the line for questions.
If you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Again, that is star one to ask a question. We'll go ahead and take our first question from Andy Kaplowitz with Citi.
Good morning, guys.
Good morning, Andy.
Carlos, thanks for all your help. It was good working with you. Can you give us a little more color into how you and your customers are adjusting to COVID-related delays, especially on your problem projects? Basically, have COVID-related delays generally pushed back your timing to complete projects, and have customers in general agreed to the new completion dates and/or agreed to force majeure, as you talked about, or might we see more noise around some of your projects until COVID fades?
Thanks for that question, Andy. Actually, obviously, the clients understand that COVID is impacting our projects. Generally speaking, we're negotiating with the clients on the effects of the COVID impact, both as to schedule and as to cost. I think that the discussions are very collaborative for the most part. There's no question that there will be compensation to the contractor for impacts beyond our control. We're in the process of resolving some of those to this point in time. The problem is that obviously we don't know what the final COVID impacts are going to be until we get past the pandemic. We're engaged in some discussions right now, with clients, to resolve them to this point and then reserve the right to further negotiate down the road additional impacts.
All right. Thanks for that. Obviously, commodities have been rising relatively recently here. Have you sensed any increased willingness from your clients to open the spigots and start spending again outside of Engineering & Construction? You've talked about these mining projects in the past. I know they're pushed out, but you did mention a little bit more spend in mining, I think, over the last month. Is there any higher probability, especially if these commodity prices continue their current trend, to see more of these Engineering, Procurement, and Construction projects, non-energy, in 2021 and beyond?
Yeah. Actually, we viewed a number of prospects in the mining area. We have a process that's very disciplined about how we decide on whether to bid a project or not to bid a project, and then what to submit as a proposal. We are going through those processes on a number of projects in mining, and have been for the last several months. Yes, I'm optimistic that mining will actually begin to resurface as a major activity area for us. The world becomes more electrified and copper becomes more necessary, I expect that we will be seeing copper and gold projects coming up, and we are in the premier position to execute those projects.
Maybe one more quickie for Joe. I don't know if you can answer it, your initial margin guidance for E&C before you had to pull it was 3%-5% margin. You talked about margin being more like year-to-date, which seems like it'd be in that range. Is that the way to think about E&C margin generally going forward?
Yeah, I think that we did call it out to take a look at the nine-month run rate, Andy, and that would be a better thought process around how you could view E&C moving forward.
Thanks, guys, much appreciated.
We'll take our next question from Jamie Cook with Credit Suisse.
Hi, good morning. I just wanted to follow up on Andy's question on the E&C margins. Joe, I think if you take the year to date, you know what I mean? I don't know if that's necessarily reflective, because I think you had some charges in the first quarter, and it implied probably more like a 3% margin. Why wouldn't margins be higher than that, or at least at the high end of your 3%-5% in 2021, in particular, as activity starts to pick up? That has meaningful implications for the earnings power for 2021. If we just took the third quarter at face value and adjusted for tax and G&A, it implies like a $0.50 number. Now, that's probably too high, but it just has meaningful implications for 2021.
I guess my second question just is on the bookings outlook, understanding COVID has implications. I'm just trying to understand how much bookings are being weighed down by customers waiting for you to come out with your strategic update in which businesses will be a focus or not. Thanks.
I'll take the first one. If you go back into the nominally 3.1% run rate in E&C and you view some of the impacts that are dragging that number down to the 3%, they're really non-recurring issues. I think you're right, Jamie. If you eliminate those non-recurring issues, you're probably closer to the upper range of that 3%-5%.
Jamie, with respect to your second question, we have been talking to customers really all along during this pandemic, and so we're very close to them. They know where we're coming from, and they're not waiting for our strategy to be announced to go forward on projects with us. I think they are very comfortable, especially our oil and gas customers have expressed to us very much the desire for us to be available to them as a contractor that can execute their large capital projects.
Okay, just one follow-up. Can you just help us understand, you said the problem projects are on schedule and you haven't had material charges, but what's the dollar amount now associated with the problem projects that's in backlog? Thanks.
Well, in terms of earnings, we're on plan. In terms of cash, we're on plan as well. In terms of cash that we're going to spend. Go ahead and answer that.
Yeah, no, I can speak to the cash side of it. We had signaled back in, I think September, Jamie, that we had nominally $400 million, it's about $438 million that we were going to spend on problem projects in 2020, and that there would be a residual $200 million at that point in time based on a number of things that have occurred in 2021 and beyond. We've had improvement in execution as it relates to those problem projects. We've had some cost avoidance, that $200 million is nominally somewhere between $50 million-$75 million at this point. We have been able to improve what we saw as a cash outlay relative to problem projects in 2021 and beyond and seen some significant improvement in what that will entail.
Okay, thank you.
Overall [crosstalk].
Sorry, go ahead, Carlos.
We're very pleased with the execution of all of our projects, given what we took over in May of 2019. We have been focusing on execution, as we said back then, and it's paid dividends.
Okay. Carlos, thanks for all your help throughout this as well. It was a pleasure working with you. Thanks.
Thank you.
Likewise.
We'll take our next question from Steven Fisher with UBS.
Thanks. Good morning, I'll echo the sentiment. Thanks a lot, Carlos, and best wishes to you. Just to follow up on Jamie's question about the project deferrals and activity. It sounds like customers are not necessarily waiting for any strategy, but could you just talk a little bit more about what really is the thinking, and driver of the project deferrals? How much is COVID, how much is it commodity price, how much is it economic uncertainty, things like that. Do you have a sense of where backlog could actually bottom or stabilize, and when?
I think it varies by business segment. With respect to Oil and Gas, obviously, oil prices are a big part factor there. In terms of Mining, commodity prices somewhat, but also COVID has impacted mining business maybe more than some of the other businesses. The other business, Life Sciences is going very well. AT&LS is going very well. Government, well. We expect to see growth in Government, AT&LS, and even Mining, as we proceed into next year. In terms of the backlog, where are we now today, Joe? At 15, 20?
27.
We're burning some of that backlog. Obviously, we're not replacing the entire backlog. The backlog we're taking in, and this is really an important point. Backlog that we're taking in, is very much based on the discipline that we've established early on in 2019. We're not taking in bad projects. Backlog will decline somewhat, but it'll be good backlog.
Okay. Then in the infrastructure segment, I wonder if you can just give us a sense of how the mix of legacy projects versus newer projects will trend over the course of the year. I know it sounds like the legacy ones will become a smaller piece, do you think you're going to start off with a year, say, 20% newer project mix and by the end of 2021, that becomes 80%? How do we see that split as this business could be the big contributor to profit as well?
I don't have the percentages, but Joe, could you?
Look, I can give you a sense right now. We're nominally about $500 million that we're going to be pulling from previous backlog into 2021 and beyond. Some of the new work like Oak Hill that we've just booked into, we'll start to kind of balance that out as we move forward. Right now, we're looking at about a half a billion of projects that we're continuing to execute from the previous two, three years that'll flow into 2021.
Okay. Thanks. Yep, that's helpful.
One more point on that. Steven, obviously the termination of the Purple Line project has been a very favorable development for us because that's a large project that is a legacy project, and we'll be able to exit that project, and avoid any future risks and costs there.
Yep. That's certainly important. Just one last clarification. I know you were talking about the potential to resolve COVID project delays. Did you say, or can you say, do you expect a resolution on a force majeure decision in 2021 on LNG Canada in particular, or could that extend beyond that?
Yeah. Thanks for that question. I think the way it probably will play out in LNGC is we'll probably have a partial resolution, with respect to the impacts to date. Later on, when we're in a position to assess additional impacts, we'll negotiate that. Like I said before, it's not something we can negotiate all at once because the situation of the effects are pretty lengthy. Just a point of clarification, it's not just a force majeure claim, it's something we call change of law, because many of the impacts are a result of government-directed lockdown. It's both of those provisions that give us the basis for resolution.
Got it. Thanks very much.
Take our next question from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs.
Yes. Hi, good morning, everyone. Carlos, congratulations on really stabilizing the business and the financials. That was certainly not an easy task here.
Thank you, Jerry.
I'm wondering if we could just take a step back and talk about the balance sheet going forward now that the cash outflows are wrapping up on the problem projects. Alan, how are you and the board thinking about the balance sheet going forward? What do you need to see before we're deploying cash as a completion of LNG Canada? Can you just talk about conceptually what signposts we should look for to see when you folks might be deploying capital again once we're continuing with the turnaround here?
Good. Jerry, I'd be glad to talk about that. Clearly, I mentioned Carlos putting us in a position to reach stability. We're at a point right now, Carlos has also mentioned in his remarks, where we're engaging with our banks on our credit facilities, which will become current very early in this next year. Getting that done is an important step. Also solidifying our balance sheet and both looking to improve our credit ratings is important to us. Starting to pay down debt against that balance sheet to improve the strength of the balance sheet is another important part of the going forward strategy. We believe that we've got strong liquidity right now, as Carlos said, to be able to manage the business, to be able to face the correct prospects, and to be able to have funds for any eventuality.
It's the balance sheet now that's our strong focus. I think also it is starting to make our mark in those industries where we can see potential growth. That's going to be a very important part of the going forward strategy. We want to be able to invest in some of the industries where we think we have a great thesis, and it's not necessarily the same business groups that we've been in in the past. I don't really want to say much more, but those are our main goals going through the strategy session. We have a lot of strength in the company, and we have some opportunities, I think, to address the market that are coming forward and where we have strength, but haven't necessarily put the focus on them in the past. I hope that answers your question?
That's super helpful. In terms of, maybe just to pick up on the strength of the company along the areas where there's perceived growth, hydrogen infrastructure, obviously, copper, you alluded to. Can you flesh out what are the company's strengths in some of those areas that are obviously not driving the P&L currently, but could be interesting if we do see alternative energy technologies going forward? Outside of NuScale, what are the company's capabilities today without spilling the beans on the strategy day?
I don't want to have to scoop David Constable here. I'm going to be very general. I think we do have some significant strengths both in intellectual property, but also in the ability to execute in locales, to be able to handle permitting, to work in difficult locations, to be able to use our project management overall skills, to be able to drive a successful project. I think the actual unveiling of the markets we're really going to intend to focus and push hard on, I'm going to save for David and his team to unveil in our Investor Day coming up in early 2021. I do think it is exciting, the opportunities that we have in front of us.
I think the position that we're in now that Carlos has gotten us to will allow us to start slowly at first, but to gain momentum and in a staged process, put a very strong forward strategy together.
Something that we've seen from some companies in this environment is companies reducing the size of their office space and companies essentially right-sizing their organizations. Considering the new pockets of infrastructure build-out over the next 10 years will be different from what we've seen in terms of heavy energy investment, over call it the prior 20. How big of an opportunity is it to right-size the cost structure and right-size the footprint? Is that something that we should be thinking about going forward?
Yeah, I think you can assume that there will be a focus on that.
I appreciate the discussion. Thank you.
We'll take our next question from Sean Eastman with KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Hi, gentlemen. Thanks very much for taking my questions. I just wanted to confirm how much zero margin work is left in the backlog as of the third quarter, and how much is expected to be remaining going into 2021. I think you guys mentioned a $500 million number for the infrastructure segment specifically. I just wanted to understand how much of that zero margin work sort of rolls off and becomes a margin tailwind into 2021.
Sean, you're talking about the loss projects, if you will, that we're pulling into 2021?
Exactly.
If I highlight the two biggest, with Purple Line being pulled out of backlog, the two biggest projects that are contributing to the backlog rolling into 2021 are Green Line and Bergstrom. Bergstrom is 80% complete and Green Line is 35% complete. They represent the lion's share of that balance. My recommendation is that I think it's tied up into those two projects, and then we'll start seeing some of the benefit of the new work that's coming in that we booked in this quarter.
That's helpful. Would you be able to tell us how infrastructure margins are running year to date in 2020, ex the loss project?
Yeah, no, it's difficult at this point because they're all running at kind of zero margin at this point for the loss projects.
We would have to do some weighted view relative to what we're putting in the backlog. Really any of the new work that's going into the infra side of the business has just been booked in the previous quarter. I think it would be better to have that discussion in the February timeframe when we have a little bit more color around it.
Okay. That's fair. You guys have previously talked about getting that domestic readily available cash balance up to sort of the $1 billion level. I'm curious where that number is today and kind of exiting 2020.
Currently, we'll exit for the $2.1 billion, about 36% of that is readily available domestic cash. We're on our way. Again, to Alan's comment, I don't want to get out in front of Mr. Constable's strategy meetings, but as we go through the strategy, we'll probably have a review of what that cash balance needs to be to support the organization and the brick-and-mortar footprint and some of the other things that'll be a fallout of what the new strategy is moving forward. That number may look or change as we get into discussions in Investor Day.
Okay, thanks. I appreciate it.
Operator, can we take the next question?
Can you guys still hear me, or should I just keep going?
I think you have it, yeah.
All right, I got the floor. Okay, if you look at the corporate G&A expenses, the underlying number is running quite low year to date. Could you guys talk a little bit about that dynamic, sort of where the savings are coming in there, what's sustainable, and maybe where that corporate G&A run rate goes into next year?
Yeah. I think if you take, in my opening comments, Sean, I think if you take the $68 million, you take the FX impact out of it, you take the investigative cost out of that, you're down at about a $30 million number. I would suggest that if I give guidance around what that run rate may look like going forward, I'd say somewhere between $35 million-$45 million at this point.
Okay, got you. That's helpful. I'll try turning it over again for my colleague to get a chance, but if not, I'll keep going.
We'll take our next question.
Operator, go ahead.
We'll take our next question from Dustin Haas with Robert W. Baird.
Thank you. I've got two here. First one I guess probably kind of an easy one, can you just quantify the de-scoping on the Purple Line, what that was, the backlog, and it looks like actually maybe there was a re-scoping, going through the Form 10-Q, the reconciliation shows that maybe something came back in. Can you just talk about those two items?
I think that top line on Purple Line, what we did take out of backlog was $543 million. I would suggest maybe we go back and see if we can follow up on your second question, Dustin. Is it Dustin? Sorry.
Okay. That's fine. We can follow up.
Yeah, $543 is the number that came out of backlog for Purple Line.
Great. Thank you. Second one is just on the AMECO sale. I understand it being pushed back, but I guess how advanced is that first half 2021 expectation? I think in the past, you guys had quantified something like $200 million- of proceeds from AMECO. You got the $18 million from the Jamaica piece, which was obviously a small piece, but is that still a reasonable number, or is there anything that you can give us as an update about expectations for what the cash proceeds might be from that? Thank you.
Yeah. As we had started this process and holistically trying to transact the business, it's become clear as we've gotten into some fairly serious negotiations here that it will more than likely be transacted on a regional basis, being North America and South America, being two discrete elements of the transaction. We are very well progressed in discussions on the North American side and continue to develop a transactional strategy for the South American side. We wouldn't come off of that $200 million range. We believe that's a reasonable expectation. We are just significantly closer to the North American sale than we are the South American sale. Still slated for the first half of 2021 for North America.
Great. No, that's helpful. Thank you very much. That's all I have.
We'll take our next question from Michael Dudas with Vertical Research Partners.
Good morning, gentlemen. Well done, Carlos.
Good morning, Michael. Thank you.
Recognizing how your new focus on discipline on bidding on projects and the overall decline in the market, maybe you can highlight a couple areas that you've seen in the last couple of months, maybe heading into 2021 on the energy side, where you're seeing some green shoots, but also maybe in the governments and diversified services, maybe a bit of some observations on re-compete opportunities to grow backlog and generate better work in those two end markets. Certainly governments, a little bit counter-cyclical and diversified services certainly are impacted by COVID and small cap projects being pressured. It would just be some of those observations to set things up as we look towards 2021 and beyond.
In Energy & Chemicals, we didn't specifically mention this, but I want to mention now, the chemicals business is still a very steady business for us, and we don't expect to see a decline there. In the Energy & Chemicals business, I mean, the oil and gas business, we talked about the discipline that our clients are going to demonstrate. We expect that that's going to be a challenging area for a little while. With respect to government, we are very well-positioned in the DOE space. For example, we've won a number of projects. Some of those are being challenged, being protested, but we feel pretty good about our position on those, and we see continued opportunities in the government space.
That's also true in the Advanced Technologies & Life Sciences, where we're actually working on some COVID-related facilities as well as other pharmaceutical type of projects. That is an area that we anticipate will have lots of opportunity for us as well. Again, we mentioned mining. I think mining may be a little bit later coming up, but we're very bullish on mining as well. Infrastructure, we've defined that we're going to restrict our bidding to jurisdictions where the Department of Transportation executes projects or finances projects in a way that's fair [audio distortion] to us and to contractors in general, and we've been successful. Texas is certainly one of those, and there are several other states we've mentioned in the past where we've been able to complete projects successfully for both the client and for Fluor.
Yeah. Follow-up, Carlos, how do you guys feel about, in general, NuScale going into 2021? Is some pretty big milestones can we anticipate on that front, whether it's a new project or more support on the development or investment side?
There's lots going on there, but I'm going to let Alan take that one.
Yeah, Michael, a very good question. I think several things have happened over the last six months that have been incredibly positive for the NuScale business and its development. Number one, Carlos mentioned the NRC approval. That's clearly one of the biggest ones. The Development Finance Corporation of the U.S. announced lifting their prohibition on lending for nuclear projects international. That has gotten a lot of attention and has resulted in probably two fairly good opportunities to turn into projects here within 2021. The other thing that happened is DOE announced a $1.4 billion grant award for the first nuclear project to use small modular reactors. Right now that's targeted for the . project to drive that forward. We are talking with at least two other clients with potential imminent projects coming up within 2021.
The project side is starting to look good, but also we're having very serious discussions with investors who want to come into the equity side of NuScale. Both sides of the equation are looking strong right now. The timing is the issue, and getting these projects on board as well as investors on board is taking a lot of our attention.
Alan, I would think that the incoming administration would be net positive towards this, I would think, given decarbonization. I don't know if you have any observation on that.
Actually, the answer to that is yes. It's interesting that NuScale really got its boost and started moving forward under the Obama administration with Secretary Moniz as the head of DOE. We've seen over the last, even during this last administration, a very strong bicameral support for this effort. We don't think that will change at all. In fact, if anything, it may give a little extra boost.
Thanks, guys.
We'll now take our final question from Michael Sibal with Bank of America.
Hey, guys. Thanks for squeezing me in. I really appreciate it. The cash balance, the $2 billion, is impressive that it's still at that level. Even year-to-date, the cash from ops, it looks like the $144 million up from a year ago, even with some of the losses that you guys talked about this year. I guess anything we should be aware of that has benefited you this year that might reverse on the cash from ops side in 2021? With this question, the fact that the cash balance has been relatively stable over the last 12 months, yet your backlog is under pressure in new orders, is it likely that the cash balance comes down, gets drawn down through 2021? Any confidence you can provide there on that?
Yeah, I'll take the question. Our cash balances are kind of a function of a number of the initiatives that we've put into place, the least of which is the bidding principles and what is going into backlog and the cash that it's generating, I think, one. Two, I think the cost optimization program has been very beneficial. In fact, we had set a target of $100 million and, without divulging what that number is, we'll be north of that number in terms of real cash savings for the year. I think to the extent that I had mentioned earlier, Michael, that we are executing our loss provision projects more effectively and efficiently than we had anticipated back in September have all been benefits. I would call this most of the cash generation that you're seeing is through organic decisions and actions that the company is taking currently.
Understood. When we talked about, to Jamie's question earlier, the 3.1% margin, like year to date in E&C, it actually sounds like it's higher if we count charges. You mentioned maybe 4%-5%. Is that what we're thinking heading early into 2020, that we should be more on the 5% number? Can you just help me understand with what you were saying year to date, how much has LNG Canada actually contributed to that number? Is margin being recognized above that range as you guys start to build out that project?
I'll answer it maybe holistically and we'll probably get into the LNGC call or question maybe a little bit later in February when we talk about it. The impacts really that are driving the 3.1% cumulative margins through the first nine months are some of the disclosed COVID impacts. We have a credit risk on a project in Mexico, and then we have a loss on the transaction for Fluor, which we would consider to be non-recurring events at the end of the day. If you normalize those out, we're closer to the 5% range. I would suggest that's probably a better number to utilize moving forward.
Got it. That's really helpful. It's impressive when, as you guys mentioned, no project charges on execution the last three quarters, yet just following up on Steve's question, it sounds like we're getting a little bit more visibility on the impact of COVID for LNG Canada. I guess, how many other projects out there right now that there are some need for resolution? I understand that's kind of normal course of the business. I don't know if this is a little bit more than the normal course with what you guys are stating. I guess I'm just trying to reconcile the really impressive last two quarters of no big charges, yet the outlook is kind of pandemic impacting staffing and execution.
Could we wake up in the middle of 2021 or end of 2021 when the vaccine's out there, economy's humming, yet there still are some litigation or charges? Is there any way you guys can kind of frame that for us and how to think about that in timeline?
Yeah, I'll take that one. In terms of COVID, obviously the fixed price projects are the ones where we have COVID impacts that are being negotiated with the client. I don't think any client is denying entitlement. Clients obviously will negotiate with us in terms of the amount as to schedule and cost. We're working with the clients on some of these projects and have already reached some preliminary resolutions which are favorable. We still have a number of them to be resolved, and it's hard to resolve them because the impacts are still ongoing in some cases, in many cases. I can't tell you the magnitude.