Good morning, and welcome to the HB Fuller First Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity Please note this event is being recorded. Would now like to turn the conference over to Barbara Doyle, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, ma'am.
Good morning. Welcome to HB Fuller's fiscal 2019 first quarter earnings call. Our speakers today are Jim Owens, HP Fuller President and Chief Executive Officer and John Corcoran, Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer. After our prepared remarks, we will take your questions. Please let me cover a few items before I turn the call over to Jim.
First, a reminder that our comments today will include references to non GAAP financial measures. These measures are in addition to the GAAP results, in our earnings release and in our forms 10Q10K. We believe that discussion of these measures is useful to investors, to assist the understanding in our earnings release. Also, we will be making forward looking statements during this call. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties.
Actual results could differ materially from these expectations, because of factors discussed in our earnings release, comments made during this conference call, and risk factors in our Form 10 K, filed with the Securities And Exchange Commission and available on our website at investors. Hbfuller.com. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward looking statements. Lastly, we filed an 8 K on March 25, 2019, that provided restated unaudited historical financial information for the 2018 fiscal year that ended December 1, 2018. This filing reflects accounting changes implemented in effective basis at the beginning of fiscal year 2018.
The changes include an accounting standard update related pension plans, and a customer realignment between certain operating segments. These changes have no impact on the company's consolidated net income, consolidated balance sheets, or consolidated statements of cash flows previously reported. Our remarks today provided in this 8 K. Now please turn to Slide 3 in the investor deck, and I will turn the call over to Jim Owens.
Thank you, Barbara, and welcome to everyone. During today's call, I will provide a summary of our first quarter business performance against our 2019 imperatives. And then I'll discuss business performance by segment. I'll turn it over to John to review our financials. And then finally, we will wrap up the call with some closing comments and then take your questions.
Were in line with our expectations and our guidance despite organic revenue growth below our expectation. Our first quarter results demonstrated the resilience of our business model and the clear strategic positioning of H. B. Fuller in key market segments. Strong pricing carryover from 2018, cost synergies and effective expense controls all helped to deliver solid performance.
We entered the year expecting organic revenue growth to be lower in Q1 for a few reasons. Last year's Q1 growth was unusually high at 11% on a pro form a basis. December 1st month of our Q1 was generally slow as was reported by many companies. The strengthening dollar, which impacted the year over year results in Q1, and the planned repositioning of our construction adhesive portfolio and a slowdown in China. In addition to these expected impacts, our revenue was lower than forecasted primarily because of softness in our roofing business and durable assembly solutions for the housing market in the overall benefit of Royal Synergies, our pricing actions from last year and wins at key customers and targeted markets overcame these shortfalls and improved our profit performance.
And our organic revenue is improving. Going forward, as many of the elements impacting Q1, will not be a the beginning of the year in 3 key areas. 1st, we will deliver higher levels of EBITDA. Margin improvement continues to be an operational focus for us in 2019 as we look to build upon the EBITDA growth we achieved in 2018. You will hear this theme repeated across each of our segments.
We met this objective in Q1 as adjusted EBITDA of $83,000,000 increased on a constant currency basis, and adjusted EBITDA margin of 12 percent increased by 40 basis points versus the first quarter of 2018. We expect EBITDA trends to continue to increase during the course of the year with solid improvement in total for 2019. Our second imperative is to continue to progress as planned with the integration of the Royal Acquisition. We captured an additional $3,000,000 total incremental cost synergies in 2019. Our third imperative is to deliver our debt repayment commitments Our debt paydown of $12,000,000 in Q1 was greater than Q1 of last year.
Just like in 2018, our cash flow from operations and the rate of our debt repayment will accelerate throughout the year based on the seasonal profile of our business. Thus far we have paid down $216,000,000 in since the beginning of 2018, and our $200,000,000 repayment plan in 2019 will put us ahead of our original 2 year plan for debt reduction. Now, I'll cover In the Americas, revenues were up modestly in constant currency, primarily on pricing gains from 2018 and strong packaging sales. These gains offset soft demand in some durable assembly areas such as doors and windows and a slowdown in demand for RVs in the U. S.
Adjusted EBITDA margin of 12 percent improved 30 basis points year over year, driven by positive pricing and lower SG and A expense. The EIMEA sales increased about 1% in constant currency with flattish overall sales in core Europe and mid single digit growth in emerging markets. Positive pricing contribution and strong volumes from our new generation energy efficient insulating glass solution. We're offset by a general market slowdown in core euro indoorable assembly and packaging impala. The weaker euro, British pound and Turkish lira compared with the first quarter of 2018 substantially impacted reported revenue.
Currency also negatively impacted EBITDA as the weaker currencies combined with some dollar based operating costs offset underlying margin improvement. Asia Pacific Organic Sales were flat, strong growth in Southeast Asia, hygiene and packaging offset slower sales in other geographies, including lower demand for durable assembly products for woodworking and textiles, reflecting a softer export market. We saw some stabilization although sales still lag historical levels. EBITDA performance in Asia Pacific was very strong with a 25% year over year increase in EBITDA dollars and a 250 basis point increase in EBITDA margins driven by our continuous pricing portfolio and margin focus. Construction Adhesives organic sales were up by 15% versus Q1 of twenty team.
As we reported in the middle of last year, we are moving away from underperforming products and customers in order to maximize profit performance. And we forecasted a revenue decline in the quarter as a result. This planned portfolio repositioning accounted for a little more than half of this decline. The remainder was related to more severe weather in Q1 than anticipated, impacting this segment and roofing adhesives in particular. Love sales volume also impacted EBITDA.
The roofing impact was pretty significant, especially in late January February. For context, the single ply roofing Institute and independent data source reported February shipments of EPDM rubber roofing membrane was down 25% compared to February of 2018. Weather impacts are temporal of course, and are part of what drives the significant seasonality For H. B. Fuller, our fiscal first quarter includes Christmas, Chinese New Year and weather related slowdowns in December, January, February.
Both sales and contribution margin in construction adhesives have begun to improve going into Q2. Lastly, performance in Engineering Adhesives was strong. EBITDA dollars were up 21%, and EBITDA margin was up by 3.30 basis points to 19%, driven by strong growth in the higher margin parts of our business. Organic revenues increased by mid single digits, excluding a 4% currency impact. We continue to win new applications with customers across many end markets, and Q1 strong growth in electronics, new energy and aerospace offset slower results in automotive.
We forecast continued strong performance in Engineering Adhesives, including higher organic growth in the second quarter and low double digit organic growth for the full year, along with strong EBITDA performance. Overall, our bottom line performance in Q1 was in line with our expectations and our guidance even as we absorb some large unplanned weather related impacts of construction. We are seeing improved results in the 2nd quarter and we continue to forecast strong results in the second half of the year.
Now let me turn the call over to John to discuss our financials and our guidance in more detail. Thanks, Jim. I'll begin on Slide 5 with some additional financial details on the first quarter. Net revenue was down 5.6%, versus the same period last year driven by a significantly stronger dollar, which negatively impacted net revenues by nearly 5%. Adjusting for currency, organic revenue was down 1%.
A solid pricing carryover was offset by softness in construction related markets over the winter months and repositioning away from underperforming products and customers in the construction adhesive segment. Year on year adjusted gross profit margin increased 90 basis points, reflecting strong pricing actions taken last year, acquisition synergies and manufacturing efficiency gains. Adjusted selling, general and administrative expense was down about 2.5% versus last year. Reflecting the impact of foreign currency Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter of $83,000,000 was in line with our expectations and guidance. EBITDA margin increased 40 basis points versus the same period in 2018, reflecting strong pricing carryover, improved business mix, manufacturing efficiency gains and expense control offsetting weaker volume in construction related markets.
Adjusted earnings per share were $0.34, compared to $0.35 for the same period last year. As improved margins, good expense control and lower interest expense associated with our debt reduction actions, offset significant currency headwinds versus last year. With that, let me now turn to our guidance for the 2019 fiscal year. We continue to expect adjusted EBITDA of between $465,000,000 $485,000,000 for the full year 2019 This represents an increase of 6 quarters based on the seasonality of our business, improving volumes and moderating foreign currency exchange impacts, and we expect approximately 120,000,000 $125,000,000 of adjusted EBITDA of between $3.15 $3.45. This range represents growth of 10% versus the 2018 fiscal year at the midpoint of the range.
With that, I will now turn the call back to Jim Owens for some closing comments.
Thank you, John. Our strategic plan to win business in highly engineered applications and to improve margins through effective pricing, synergies, and raw material costs, all were executed well in Q1 and continued to show positive momentum. In the quarter, we leveraged acquisition related synergies and the strong pricing actions that we took in 2018, along with continued customer wins and engineering adhesives, and other key markets to deliver earning results and debt paydown in line with our guidance. Based on improving trends in several segments throughout the quarter, We expect stronger organic growth in the 2nd quarter and continued EBITDA improvement throughout the year. We are on track to deliver EPS, EBITDA, and debt pay down within our guidance ranges for fiscal 2019.
Our first quarter results show the resiliency in our business model, as we build on our strategic position as a global leader in adhesives. We are winning customer business and gaining share in our targeted growth markets. We can't control the macro factors we are gaining share That concludes our prepared comments for today. So operator, let's open up the call for
questions. And our first question today comes from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird. Please go ahead.
Guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Good morning. I guess first off, in the past, you've given us a volume breakdown by segment, hoping you could do the same for the first quarter as well.
I'm just trying to reconcile that 4% decline and how that kind of flowed through by segment and then also the same with price mix, if you could.
Yes. So I'll comment and maybe John can add. We talked a little bit about this during our Investor Day. The volume mix breakdown is something especially by a segment on a quarter by quarter basis that really hasn't been providing enough meaningful information And the reason for that Ghansham is because for any customer that we have, we can change the product, the price, the packaging, as well as the amount of adhesive that that customer uses. So we look, specifically at organic revenue as the big driver of our business this has gotten even more important as we've integrated Royal.
We sell adhesives in 30 cc's up to tank trucks. So these volume metrics, I think we're creating a lot of noise on a quarter by quarter basis that weren't really driving. And that's why we've, we've stopped doing it on a segment basis by quarter, but we still reported for the overall business as well. So John, you want to add something to that? Yes,
I mean, I think we tried to give a little color in the script too, maybe to reemphasize it, I'd say, in the regional adhesives markets, it's very similar picture to Q4 with pricing really driving, the net impact there with a little, attrition in volume similar to what we saw in Q4. Engineering Adhesives is volume driven, right? And that's been the case. And construction is really a volume story as well. So hopefully that gives you some color.
That's helpful. And then just from a high level basis, obviously, I mean, volumes did step down meaningfully in the first quarter versus the previous portal run rate probably lower than you thought during initially when you constructed the guidance for 2019. I guess what are the offsets that give you confidence in your reiterating guidance? Is it lower raw material costs? Is it something that you're seeing from a synergy standpoint or commercialization, etcetera?
What are the offsets that give you confidence on the Thanks so much.
Yes, thanks Ghansham. Yes, as we pointed out, some of the things that happened in Q1 are going away in Q2, right? So, from an organic revenue standpoint. But more importantly, I think even in that kind of environment where we had weaker organic revenues, the benefits of raw materials and the benefits of Royal Synergies are flowing through our P and L. So I think the combination of an improving trend If you look at the quarter, December was a problem for us as it was for other people.
It continued to improve and we see that continuing to improve here into March. So the top line is definitely improved as the quarter went on. The roofing impacts, which were sizable for our business, go away But I think most importantly, while we have a lot of optimism is because of what's underlying in our business, stronger margin performance due to raw materials, and the synergies taking effect as we as we go forward.
And our next question comes from Dimitri Silverstein with Buckingham Research. Please go ahead with your question.
Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. A couple of things that I kind of want to dig into the construction products, transformation that you guys are undergoing. So You talked about a little bit over half of the decline being caused by you walking away from some business or however you want to term it. I guess what I'm trying to understand is how long is this pruning going to last as far as it being overwhelmed if you were or overwhelming the growth in your other businesses and resulting in slower behavior for the division overall.
And also, as you're executing this transformation, are you running into any kind of equipment or capacity issues where I'm assuming you're making smaller batches of higher volume or higher margin products and that's part of your transformation, is your equipment and your plant setup and processes, are they aligned with that type of transformation, or is there work that needs to be done there on the CapEx side?
Okay, great. Yes, thanks. Thanks for that question, Dimitry. It's a good one for us to spend a little time explaining. I think a good thing to do is look at our Q4 in terms of what happened in our results.
So we had a decline in revenue, but an improvement in EBITDA. And I think if we hadn't had this roofing effect, you'd see that same this quarter, you would have actually seen EBITDA up on lower revenue. And so it was really about defining those pieces of our business. There's business we were we were supplying that was very high volume bulk business that was ultimately negative profit once we took away some of the costs. So In terms of your question on capital, we have the capital to manage this.
So I think it's a business that has not like it's a dramatic shift into a completely new area. We had both product lines or both types of product lines and it's about shifting our growth focus on those areas where there's better profit performance And those things that are, I'll call them more commoditized businesses that are lower technology, cement and sand in a bag for things like mortars pulling those things, the volumes down on those, where we don't have the value add that we have in the rest of our product line. But we have the capacity we need And in fact, part of this whole thing drives a better, more efficient supply chain, because we were moving products inefficiently around the country. So part of this was and efficient process to move, relatively low margin products around the country. So does that give you the background you need, Dimitry?
It does. Jim, thank you for that.
And if I could follow-up really quick, you made recent announcement of getting into the Japanese market as a HP Fuller rather than through a joint venture that you already had there. Can you spend a little time explaining to us how that's going to work and why the decision to get into Japan directly was made at this time and how do we think about that business going forward?
Yeah, I think that's a technical issue, Dimitry. Our business is through a joint venture with Sekasui Fuller. It's a great joint venture. It gets reported as, book as such in our P and L below the line. And that's the primary driver of our businesses.
There's some technicalities in the contract. That said that we had to have certain people employed locally. So it's a it's a technicality and not at all a change in our strategy. We love the joint venture and it's a very success
Okay. So this is not a competing business that you're making.
No, not at all. Not at all. It allows us to do some things in a couple of areas. Specifically in engineering adhesives that we weren't able to do directly through the joint venture, but it just helps us accelerate our engineering adhesives growth strategy.
Okay. Fair enough, Jim. Thank you.
Thanks, Dimitry. Thanks for the question.
And our next question comes from Mike Harrison with Seaport Global Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning. I was wondering if you can talk a little bit about specifically about the engineered engineering Adhesives business. It seems like that sales growth maybe decelerated a little bit. Maybe talk about which specific regions or markets were holding up and which of those deteriorated. It sounded like it was auto, which not surprising.
But maybe give us a sense of what gives you confidence that we're going to return to better volume growth rates in the rest of the year.
Yes. So a couple of comments there, Mike. We first off, the growth we're seeing is in electronics, in aerospace, in, in some of our general industries opportunities, particularly in the, in the U. S. Where we're seeing really good growth as we've leveraged technology from Royal and from Tonsan into into North America.
You're right. The auto business was weaker and particularly in China and particularly in December. So we see that not as bad going forward. We're not overly optimistic on the auto business, but what we do see is a lot of the winds keep rolling in, specifically in electronics, Some of our microelectronics efforts now are starting to take hold. We're winning some business now in Korea that's helping that business.
We're able to expand our solar business, which is really a solar assembly business to some of the accessories and some of the installations around solar. So A lot of those good wins are still rolling through that business. As you know, our model there is to leverage our technology and really solve problems faster than everybody else. And that piece of the model continues to churn out wins. I'd also point out Q4 of last year was very strong for that business.
Q1 of last year was very strong in that business. So, you know, the fact that we went down to the single digit we're very confident that that business will be back up in double digits soon. Despite the fact that auto is probably going to be either flat to a headwind this year.
Got it. And then I was also hoping that you could talk a little bit about the SG and A number, if we do the math right, it looks like on an absolute basis, your SG and A costs were down in terms of absolute dollars, but up in terms of percent of sales. I guess we're a little surprised by that given some of the efforts around Royal Synergies But does that reflect just some normal inflation or growth investments? Wondering when we might expect to see some better SG and A leverage?
Yes. So, so let me start by saying that a lot of the Royal Synergies weren't on the SG and A side. So there's some, some, you know, they're mostly in operations costs and in raw material and indirect savings costs. And then the other thing I'd say is that there's a fair amount of lumpiness in any one quarter in our SG and A cost as a percentage of sales. So I'd be I think we look at this over the course of the year rather than as percentage of sales each quarter.
But let me turn it to John to maybe be more precise about what happened in the quarter. Mike? Yes.
No, those are all the right points, Jim. I think the only other thing I would add is that if you look at our cost structure relative to our revenue structure, we have more costs and dollars, right? So we have a larger U. S.-based headquarters that, has an impact in terms of looking at it as a percentage of sales. We believe we're getting the leverage and the synergies out of the out of SG And A that we planned, but we do have a little bit of a currency impact.
All right. Understood. Thanks very much.
Just as color there, Mike, on the currency. The euro, we it happened last year, but The euro today is 10% weaker than it was a year ago today. So it's a big number.
And our next question comes from David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead with your question.
Hi, this is Dew Huang here for David. I guess first given your comment on coding, what whether in Q1 impacting construction volumes. I was wondering if you can quantify roughly what percentage would be shifted to Q2 from Q1? And if those would again be offset by some lingering impact in March?
Yes. So it's tough for us to really know when you have these kind of weather effects on roofing, I can tell you. I pulled up in our parking lot today and it warmed my heart to see a bunch of roofers climbing up on our roof to do some repairs that were up there. And I can tell you, business is very strong here in March. But how much of that's going to come into Q2 versus Q1 is something that we're not able to predict, but it should be positive.
So
Okay. And secondly, do you need to take additional cost actions to achieve, say, your mid to high end of your EBITDA guidance for the year?
Yes, I would say that if you look to the mid to the high end, that's, I think the combination of revenues organic revenue stabilizing to where we expect them and then the benefits of raw materials, right? So the raw material benefits only flow through our P and L in a modest way. We'll see more benefits in Q2 currently, we're projecting for raws to flatten out or maybe get a little worse in the second half of the year. So I think for us to coming through. So that's the way we look at the upside of the plan.
And I think we went into the year with that as the expectation and we're still there. That's what drives the top end.
And our next question comes from Eric Petrie with Citi. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning, Jim. Good morning, Eric. You noted signs of stabilization in China and positive growth in the region. You think that's sustainable if there's no trade resolution or how do you see that playing out into the rest of the year? Well, I hate to be the prognosticator of China, but I would say, it is a fact that we grew in our regional business in China.
So I thought that was a good sign. I think as I had said last quarter, there was definitely 2 things going on, a slowdown in China and a destocking I think that destocking has stopped because things will be stopped. So I would say, Certainly, if the trade war and there's a great grand deal, I think it's going to really help China a lot and it'll help our business a lot. If there's not, I think, slow, low growth is where we're at today and what I'd expect and what we're what we're building our plans on. And, but not that negative downturn that we saw in Q3 and Q4.
So John, do you want to add anything to that or?
No, I think that's exactly right. I think maybe we saw a little more improvement in sort of the consumer led parts of business, as opposed to those that are more impacted by exports.
Yes, it's a great point. So things like hygiene and packaging get better than some of the export funds. Helpful. Thank you. And then could you give a little color as to why organic growth in EMEA is doing better than Marcus.
Yes. Well, let me, let me give a high level and then maybe John can, and I think our EMEA business has a higher percentage of business outside of core Europe. So Middle East, India, Africa are the fundamental growth drivers for our business. It's not core Europe. John, do
you want to add something? I think that was the point I was going to make. And I think we've always kind of said that as we've looked at the growth in EIMEA versus Americas. We've always sort of looked at a 1 roughly 1% higher growth target in EIMEA based on the higher growth in emerging markets.
Great. Thank you.
Thanks Eric. And our next question comes from Rosemary Morbelli with G. Research. Please go ahead.
Jim, you mentioned that there are certain areas which are sowing signs of pickup. So you have mentioned, roofing, but that is weather related. And I was wondering if fundamentally speaking, you could talk about some of those areas and what you see going forward?
Yes. I'm not sure I said that we'd sell great signs of of growth out there. I think we see stability in China. We see really strong growth in Southeast Asia. I think Southeast Asia benefited as well as our team doing a really solid job out there.
As John mentioned, the consumer businesses in China have been positive. In North America, the things that we saw that were a negative were recreational vehicles and then construction related production of materials that would be used in homes. But, and then the other place where we see some positive growth as John just mentioned was Middle East, Africa, India, we see things there picking up a little. So
Any particular areas picking up in those particular in the Middle East Africa, India?
Yeah. I would say for us, Africa is we made an investment there a couple of years ago. We put some teams on the ground. So we're doing pretty well in Africa. And then our India business, India got a little bit of a shock as the as as the currency devalued them at all last year, I think that's stabilizing.
And India has been a good solid growth engine for us, second half of last year. That slowed down. We see that picking up, but those would be the the 2 particular ones.
So then, looking at your debt reduction, that $200,000,000 target for this year Is that a level that you are anticipating going forward? And then in case of a recession, what would be a comfortable net leverage level? I mean, if you do pay down another $200,000,000 this year, you will be at about $1,900,000,000 of net debt. And a 4.0 net leverage, which seems high in a recession in particular. So Can you tell us talk about what you are planning in doing in order to offset what may be coming?
Yes. So why don't I, I want to give you high level and then maybe John can give you some more depth. So our commitment was to pay down $600,000,000 over the 1st 3 years after the Royal deal. Last year, we exceeded that number by $30,000,000 this year. And despite issues this year, and I've got some organic growth issues, we're well committed to do $200,000,000 or better.
And then next year, our original plan was to do $230,000,000. So I think we have a very clear 3 year plan on this debt pay down. With a goal to get below 3.0 as quickly as we possibly can. And there are a number of levers that we can pull with respect to working cap at all capital management that if there were a recession that we would we would look to pull on to make certain that we brought our our leverage ratios down, but it's a strategic priority for us to do that. John, you want to comment further?
I think you hit all the key points. I think getting below 3 long term is our goal. That's where we'd be comfortable. We've we do try to model what the implications would be of a recession. And typically in the short term, they're actually neutral to positive if raw materials are coming down and if there's kind of a working capital release.
So we're comfortable. We're going to stay on this debt repayment plan sort of, regardless of the external environment.
But we have some models we run and action plans that we put in place if a recession were to take place. And as John pointed out, this working capital release is really helpful in that kind of environment.
And our next question comes from curt Siegmeyer with KeyBanc. Please go ahead.
Good morning.
Hey, if I could just ask for a clarification on your organic growth outlook, coming into the year, you were expecting 3% to 5% obviously 1Q is a little lower than you expected. So is that are you still thinking 3% to 5% or if you've maybe tune that down a little bit internally, what would be the positive offsets that are allowing you to maintain your EBITDA and EPS guidance?
Yeah, maybe I'll comment and I'll let John be more specific. But yeah, I think if you looked at our current internal models today, you'd see the lower end of that, that guidance would be where we'd be at with margin improvement for all the reasons I talked about that raw materials are more positive than we expected going into the year and the synergy delivery. So those two things would offset something where if you did 3% to 5% for the rest of the year, that's probably about what we expect and that's what we're seeing going forward. But that wouldn't get you to the center of the range. It gets you closer to the the lower end of the range.
Yes, I think that's right. I think, we have a little bit of an easier comparison probably in Q4 with, with China sort of declining pretty precipitously and we're not protecting China to recover significantly, but we're if we kind of continue on our current trend. That will be a little bit of a positive comparison.
Got it. It's helpful.
But very confident on the mid range on the EBITDA and the EPS is the answer.
Okay, great. And then just a follow-up, your guidance now includes $20,000,000 of pre tax royal integration expenses, which I think is up from a $15,000,000 to $20,000,000 range. Can you just give us a little more color there as to why the adjustment?
I think it's kind of timing of projects more than anything with, particularly related to some of the operational projects. So we're incurring a little bit more in restructuring. I don't think it'll change sort of our expectation for the full project.
Okay. Thank you.
And our next question comes from Paretosh Misra with Berenberg. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Hi. So just in terms of your Q2 guidance, what have you assumed in terms of FX and raw material costs?
Yes, I'll let John maybe give you some, some specifics there, operator.
So FX, Paretosh, I think it's going to look very similar year on year to Q1. If you look at kind of where currencies were last year, in Q2 versus this year and compare that to Q1. In raw materials, I think we view them as moderately better than Q1. We saw some improvement in Q1 in terms of raw material costs. A lot of that is probably still hung up in inventory and will come through in Q2.
So modest improvement in raw material costs in Q2.
I see. And then going back to China, it sounds like consumer is doing its better than the export driven end markets. Have you seen any impact of some of the growth supported policies that the government has announced there earlier this year and late last year? Or are you expecting something maybe things to improve because of that in the second half?
Yes, I would say the only one that I think is, well, there's two areas that we're impacting on some of those one would be solar continues to be an area that the government is supporting and that helps drive, output in a market where we're very strong. And we've done very well with electric vehicles, especially electric buses. So some of the initiatives that are there have been helpful for us, and we see those being positive. Both of those impacting our engineering adhesive business.
Got it. And then last one for me. On your construction business, can you remind me how much the U. S. Based versus non U.
S. Based?
Yes. I think today, it's about 85% to 90% U. S.
Based.
Okay, great. Well, thank you everyone for your time today on today's call. We really appreciate the support of HB Fuller. And we're very optimistic about our overall performance going forward, particularly given the results of this first quarter. So again, thanks for your support.
And this concludes today's conference. Thank you for attending today's presentation. May check the company's website for the replay options. You may now disconnect your line at this time.