Good day, and welcome to the Magnolia Oil and Gas Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Release and Conference Call. All participants will be in listen only mode. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Brian Corrales, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, Rocco, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Magnolia Oil and Gas' Q2 2020 earnings conference call. Participating on the call today are Steve Chazen, Magnolia's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chris Stavros, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, today's conference call contains certain projections and other forward looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements.
Additional information on risk factors that could cause results to differ is available in the company's annual report on Form 10 ks filed with the SEC. A full Safe Harbor can be found on Slide 2 of the conference call slide presentation with the supplemental data on our website. You can download Magnolia's 2nd quarter 20 20 earnings press release as well as the conference call slides from the Investors section of the company website at www.magnoliaoilgas.com. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Steve Chazen.
Good morning and thank you for joining us today. My comments this morning will focus on our plans for the remainder of the year, including an update on the Giddings field. Chris will review our 2nd quarter results and financial position. He will also discuss our cost savings where we've made some good early progress to better align our cost structure with the current product price environment. He will then provide some additional guidance before we take your questions.
Magnolia's business model remains unchanged, and we continue to focus our efforts on generating stock market value over time. The recent downturn has further solidified our strategy of running a focused business, maintaining low financial leverage and spending within 60% of our cash flow, allowing us to generate consistent free cash flow. Despite the challenging product price environment during the Q2, specifically during the month of May, which was just awful, Magnolia's D and C capital was 60% 68% of our adjusted EBITDAX. Based on our planned level of activity and using current product prices, we would expect our spending to be approximately 50% of EBITDAX during the second half of the year, and we remain committed to keeping within our 60% rule for the year. In response to the sharp decline in product prices earlier this year, we took actions to reduce activity and capital spending by dropping our operated rig in Karnes and curtailing any completion of additional assets additional wells throughout our assets.
Although we have not completed any operated well since February, we continue to run 1 operated rig in Giddings Field. We are currently drilling a multi well pad in our early stage development area. Our ultimate level of activity at Giddings through the remainder of this year will depend on product prices that would allow us to keep our spending around 60% of our EBITDAX for the year. At current product prices, we plan to start completing some of the DUCs in Giddings towards the end of Q3. We do not currently plan to complete any of the operated DUCs in Karnes area during the remainder of the year.
We believe that the pace of non op activity in Karnes is currently picking up. In Karnes, we have more locations in DUCs, obviously. But because of the high initial production in a Karnes well, basically you're going to get $40.2 gas for it. I think there's plenty of time to reap that maybe next year. But in Giddings, well, we'll talk about here in a minute.
The bulk of the production is spread over at least 6 months, so you get a more average oil price. I'd like to spend a few minutes specifically on our Giddings asset, and we would turn your attention to Slide 4 in the conference call presentation. Since Magnolia's inception 2 years ago, most of our activity in Giddings was focused on gaining a better understanding of our 63 1,000 plus gross acre position through a steady exploration and appraisal program. We would drill a well then move the rig often many miles or sometimes several counties before drilling another of that well. This was not designed with the intention of forming an efficient development program, but Rev was focused on an effort towards learning more about our acreage and establishing a model that would increase our rate of success.
Through this appraisal, we were able to outline a core area of approximately 70,000 acres where our results have been very good. While there are also other areas that are getting sufficient that some very positive results, it is in this core area where we have the most data and well results. We currently have a total of 14 horizontal wells on this core acreage within with at least 180 days of production. Results have been very strong with an average well producing 13 74 barrels of oil equivalent a day for 180 days with half the production stream is oil. At another well, the average well has produced nearly 250,000 barrels of oil equivalent in the first 6 months with about half of that being oil.
Production history of these well profiles demonstrates they are very different from a typical shale well. The wells have typically reached peak production in the 2nd 30 days and have a shallower production profile than our Karnes wells and produce more oil over the life of the well. Evidence of lower rate of decline can be seen on Slide 4 as these wells have 36, 30, 90 and 180 day oil rates of 7.81 barrels a day, 783 barrels a day and 6.77 barrels a day respectively. Our most recent wells have exceeded these average rates. Our drilling activity this year in Giddings is focused on our early stage development area and all with multi well pads.
Our 1st multi well pad that we discussed last quarter had an average well cost of about $7,000,000 This was well below the $8,500,000 average cost that we experienced last year. Our well cost continue to decline towards $6,000,000 per well as we see further efficiencies and gain more experience drilling on the acreage. As an example, on our most recent three well pad that finished drilling in June, 2 of the wells set company record for per foot drilling costs. Additionally, since we have started this early stage development program, the average lateral well length has increased from about 5,000 feet between 6,000 and 7,000 feet. So our total well cost of drop of the average lateral length has increased.
The strong well results in this early stage development combined with the recent improvement in product prices has allowed us to drill additional pads in Giddings and expect to begin completing wells here before the end of the current quarter. The shallower decline rates and lower well costs should improve our capital efficiency as we continue to pursue our development of the Giddings field. The driver in all of our activities is to keep our cash flow at around 60% spending at around 60% of our cash flow. In summary, looking at 2021, if we assume $40 oil and $2 natural gas and maintain our guidance of 60% of our cash flow, we would have modest growth and generate significant free cash flow. I'll now turn the call over to Chris Stavros.
Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. As Steve mentioned, I plan to review some high level points from the 2nd quarter results, review our financial position, progress we've made on our cash costs and capital, provide some guidance before turning it over for questions. Clearly the largest driver of our Q2 financial results is a severe decline in benchmark oil prices as a result of the sharp and swift drop in oil demand. This negative impact on oil price realizations was especially evident during the month of May for which a short period time resulted in much wider than normal basin differentials. The short term disconnect to benchmark prices seen during the second quarter has now abated and we estimate our 3rd quarter oil price realizations to be approximately a $3 per barrel discount to MEH which is in line with historical differentials.
Looking at the quarterly cash flows waterfall chart on Slide 5, we began the 2nd quarter with $146,000,000 of cash and generated $33,000,000 of cash flow from operations before changes in working capital. Our costs incurred for D and C capital were $28,000,000 during the quarter. Working capital changes including the changes associated with investing activities resulted in a cash draw of $34,000,000 and we ended the quarter with a cash balance of approximately $117,000,000 Assuming we don't complete any oil and gas property acquisitions and at current product prices, we expect our cash balance to build back to levels seen at the end of the Q1. Turning to Slide 6, we reported total production of 64,100 barrels of oil equivalent per day, 53% of which was oil toward the higher end of our guidance range. Highlighting our production at Giddings, our oil production of 6,400 barrels per day during the Q2 declined only 1.5% on a sequential basis even though we did not bring on any new wells during the period.
As Steve pointed out, this clearly demonstrates shallow decline rate of our Giddings development wells and production stream in the field. Our adjusted EBITDAX was $40,000,000 in the second quarter with total drilling and completion capital costs of approximately $27,000,000 We were able to keep our D and C spending 68% of our adjusted EBITDAX during the quarter despite the headwinds from very weak product prices. Turning to costs on Slide 7, the benefit of our cost reduction is evident in our 2nd quarter results. Our total adjusted cash costs in the 2nd quarter including interest expense and G and A were $8.50 per BOE, a 29% decrease from the similar prior year period and an 18% sequential decline from the Q1. We remain on track to achieve the $55,000,000 of total operating cost savings we outlined last quarter and we think we can exceed this amount through additional reductions in our LOE and G and A cost.
As Steve noted our cost for drilling and completing wells in Giddings continue to improve and we expect our overall well cost to climb towards $6,000,000 per well through further efficiency gains. Including our DD and A rate of $8.71 per BOE for the 2nd quarter which approximates our finding and development costs, our full cycle costs during the Q2 were $17.21 per BOE as shown on Slide 7. Using this cost structure and a current product prices we expect to generate positive net income and earnings per share during the second half of the year. Our gross long term debt of $400,000,000 in senior notes which mature in 2026 remain unchanged in the quarter and we do not expect to issue any new debt. We have approximately $570,000,000 of liquidity including an undrawn $450,000,000 credit facility.
Our condensed balance sheet and liquidity as of June 30 are shown on Slides 89. Turning to guidance for the Q3, we continue to target our capital spending for drilling, completions and related production equipment to be approximately 60% of our adjusted EBITDAX which remains a core characteristic of our business model. We are currently drilling a multi well pad in Giddings with our 1 operated rig. Once this pad is finished, we will have 8 DUCs in Giddings and further drilling will be dependent on product prices and our ability to keep spending within 60% of our EBITDAX. We also have 10 DUCs in the Karnes area but did not plan to complete any Karnes operated wells during the remainder of the year.
While we did not complete any operated wells during the Q2, we do expect to complete to begin completing wells in Giddings towards the end of Q3 and production from these wells will be evident in the Q4. With no wells turned in line during the current quarter, we estimate our Q3 production to be in the range of 55,000 to 58,000 BOE per day with oil production in the range of 50% to 52% of our overall volumes. We expect the Q3 to be the trough period for this year in terms of our production. As we begin to bring on wells later this year, we expect our production levels for both the Q4 and the 2020 exit rate to exceed our production in the Q3. At current product prices we expect our D and C capital as a percent of our adjusted EBITDAX to decline during the second half of the year and be well below 60%.
We expect to generate free cash flow for the remainder of the year with our cash balance continuing to increase towards year end. In summary, Magnolia is financially well positioned with ample cash and liquidity. We are able to manage our activity levels in response to product price fluctuations and allowing us to allocate capital towards attractive opportunities. We're now ready to take your questions.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. First question comes from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Steve, my question is, thanks for the data on those first 14 Giddings development wells. So really, I mean both of my questions on that topic, so maybe I'll just hit them both. And that's the first, could you all speak to your plan to tackle Giddings as you potentially return activity next year? And specifically, would you focus more on the 70,000 development acres?
Or will you start delineating some of the remaining massive position there? And then really just secondly, you talked about in that development area lowering cost. And I'm just wondering how quickly or if you can lower the cost, how that development area would compete with Karnes? Thank you.
We'll start with the next year. Our current plan is to take 1 rig and continue drilling in the 70,000 acre piece. If we get a if we can manage it within the 60%, maybe we'll take a half a rig next year and use that to exploit some of the other places. But it's all driven, the model drives off of how much cash flow you have. Oil prices were $40 you get one set of drilling activities at $50 you get another.
We would also expect that at some point next year, we complete some of the Karnes wells. We also see that there'll be a pick up in the activity in Karnes from the non op people, although we don't have any real numbers for that. The costs will come down, like for sure, because our days drilling days to drill a well have declined sharply in the last few months and we're getting really good progress at that. It comes from drilling in the same area and you don't have to be quite as cautious as you were in some place, 3 counties away. So I'm pretty confident in the declining well costs.
The Karnes well just are shaped differently. You get a whole bunch of the production very quickly and then you have a long period of modest production. The Karnes wells, you can see it, and they all look sort of like this. You get pretty flat production. You start getting declines, maybe 3 months afterwards, decline is much shallower and the ultimate recoverable barrels will be higher, significantly higher than a Karnes well.
You get your money back quicker in a Karnes well, but you get more barrels. And if you earn a low price oil environment and you think it's going to get better over time, you want to stretch your barrels over time rather than sort of produce them all at once. It's not a particularly if you start with the 60% and you say you're not going to except for our inability to manage exactly, you're not going to exceed that and that's what guides the business. It actually creates the outcome. In a $100 oil environment or $80 environment, we probably switch to all Karnes drilling.
I'm exaggerating the numbers slightly, but so you want to reap that $80 or whatever it is as quick as you can, get your money back real quick. In a low price environment, you want to stretch the production over time. First cost goes, they'll come down pretty nicely. They're already really down.
And our next question today comes from Jeff Grampp with Northland Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Good morning, guys. Wanted to continue digging in on Giddings. And Steve, I guess just kind of curious, I know that 70,000 acres, you got 14 wells on it. Would you say that's all a decent degree derisked at this point based on kind of the dispersion of those 14 wells? And then just kind of curious how much variability around that average you're seeing within those 14?
The answer is, I think it's they're not all book munched in one place, if that's the question. So I think it pretty much tells us what's going on in the 70,000 acres. There's some variability, most of the variability you might see in the results, you might have a mechanical problem or something like that, especially some of the earlier wells where we had some mechanical problems and so you'll see more variation that probably exists. There's some variation and there's some current wells are I think we're as we've got the laterals longer, because we have more confidence in our ability to not to mess up the well, We're getting better results. So generally speaking, I would view over time that these averages would get better, not worse.
It's a lot of locations if you're going to run-in one break. It would be more entertaining if I were 40 rather than 75.
So good stuff though. Great. And then on the 2021 commentary that you gave in your prepared remarks, at 42, you don't break the rule, you grow production. I guess just wanted to clarify that, that kind of year over year growth, exit to exit growth. And then if I kind of heard you right, Steve, it sounds like that contemplates a Giddings rig, some Karnes operated DUCs and then some amount of Karnes non op, is that kind of the main inputs there?
Yes. It would be 4th quarter over the growth from the 4th quarter, where we exit. So that will be up from the 3rd quarter. So that's sort of what we think. So you'll have the non op in Karnes, completion of the DUCs in Karnes and then 1 or 1.5 rigs in Giddings.
Okay. Got it. At this 42 sort of There's a pretty Chris showed it in one of the slides. I mean, there's actually the cash costs are not that great. I mean, you got to generate a fairly wide cash margin here.
And more or less the DD and A rig after the write down is pretty much our finding cost. Maybe it's a little high to the finding costs, but it's sort of in that area. So the financial statements, I think, pretty accurately reflect what's going on, at least for a little while. They don't usually over time, but right now they're reflecting what's pretty accurately what's going on.
Got it. Understood. I appreciate the details in the time guys.
And our next question today comes from Steven Becker with KeyBanc. Please go ahead.
Hey, just want to see if you guys are getting any AFEs from other operators in Karnes?
Not much. We believe that they're doing some, but really not much. I can speculate as to why, But if you looked at it, it may be that they have lease explorations or lease drilling commitments in other basins that they have assets in, which is what I guess is going on.
Got it. Okay, great. Thanks. And that's it for me. Thanks.
Our next question today comes from Greg Tuttle with Simmons Energy.
I'm curious as to what is driving the shallow decline in the Giddings field? Is that a function of ESPs, choke management or just general reservoir quality?
No, that's general reservoir. If you think about a Giddings well compared to say Karnes well, so in getting there are natural fractures, a lot of natural fractures. Historically, the vertical wells were they use seismic and they drilled looking for the fractures, which provided natural fracking, if you want to think of it that way. So if you drill a horizontal well and you frac it, you'll have the same some of this Karnes like effect of just fracturing the reservoir, which will also open up some of these natural fractures. And they don't flow real quickly.
They it takes a while for the oil to move in there. So it's a fundamentally different overall number. You got some that looks like a typical frac well, but it's nothing to do with we're not deliberately doing this. That's the way the wells really flow.
Got you. Got you. Perfect. And then I guess maybe there's a question for Chris. With the expectation of a growing cash balance towards the end of the year and then your low cash burdens on a go forward basis, how should we think about the priority of cash outflows at some point?
Is that priority 1 debt pay down? Is that hitting the A and D market or maybe a mixture of those 2 and potentially even shareholder returns?
Well, there's only so many things you can do. So you can buy your shares, you can pay in the debt or call in some of the debt over time. We've prioritized over the last certainly a couple of years, we've prioritized acquisitions and we've acquired a bunch of oil and gas properties that have been accretive to the model and accretive to the stock. So if we can find some of those things, we'd like to do some of things if they're accretive and sort of PDP value at best, maybe sort of 2x, 3x cash flow. But otherwise, I'd let Steve talk to the dividend or something different.
As far
as the debt goes, that make we only have $400,000,000 of debt. And we've got 6 more years to go. It's not exactly a big burden. And we're our coverage is certainly less than one, even in these prices. So there's no reason to do anything with that and there's no real gain in it, I don't think, sort of the last resort.
I think as far we'll just see where we are and see what happens with the with really two things. 1 is will there be an opportunity to in A and D market to acquire things that fit in. We're not talking about going to some other basin, but things that fit in and give us where there's real synergies. You never really want to buy from somebody that knows more than you do about the asset. So we don't want to be at least even with them.
So and there are some small things we can do buying increased working interest in our current occasion and that's still an option for us right now.
Today's next question comes from Nicholas Pope with Seaport Global. Please go ahead.
Good morning, guys. Good morning.
I just wanted to talk
a little bit more topic of the day, I guess, with Giddings. How many of the wells we are looking at in that core area have has Magnolia drilled and completed versus what was in place in those numbers upon the acquisition of the asset?
All 14 are ours.
Oh, they're all yours? Yes. Got it. And when I look at like the and just you kind of hit on the variance that we see and I think this is a comfort with just a lot of investors with these chalk plays and the variability of kind of performance. I guess what is you kind of seen what performance has been to date, like when you start to project the drilling program in Giddings, what are the Magnolia expectations of variance on well performance in that core area going forward?
Well, what we aside from a mechanical problem or a bad some kind of drilling screw up. The wells are within a modest amount. There are some considerably better. That's true.
Those are the ones that jump out on the screen, I guess, is the huge wells that you guys have done there.
We didn't cherry pick the wells. These are the These are all the wells. These are all that we have 180 days of production. Yes, right.
That's all there is. All right. All right. There really isn't anybody else that drills in this area because we have all the acreage. So that's all there is.
We didn't pick any of it, what it is. And so you want to use the if you want to do a standard deviation, you can do that. But some of the weaker wells are basically ones that had some mechanical problems. They aren't nothing fundamental. Not to say that there if you drill 50 of these, that there won't be some near the edge.
As we move as we might try to expand the 70,000 acres to 80,000 or something like that, you could run into an edge play, I suppose. But as far as drilling within the sort of current boundaries, this is what you're going to get. You will get some variance, there's no question about that. We've shown you all the data there is. We don't have anymore.
I appreciate that. I just wanted to hear
you guys talk about it. That makes sense. Thank you. That's all I had.
Thanks. And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to the management team for any final remarks.
Thank you for participating in the call, and we'll talk to you next quarter.
Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.