Good day, and welcome to the MicroVision third quarter 2021 financial and operating results conference call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Lindsey Stibbard. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome everyone to MicroVision's third quarter 2021 financial and operating results conference call. Joining me on today's call are Sumit Sharma, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Holt, Chief Financial Officer. The information in today's conference call includes forward-looking statements, including statements regarding product development, potential product sales, scalability of technology and designs, expected performance of products, comparisons with competing products or technology, market opportunities and future demand, advantages of our technology, business and strategy opportunities and execution, expected customer and partner engagement, product development applications and benefits, commercialization of our technology, strategy for customer sales, maximizing shareholder value, managing costs, future royalties, projections of future operations and financial results, availability of funds, as well as statements containing words like potential, intend, believe, expects, plans, could, likely, and other similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance.
Actual results could differ materially from the future results implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements. We encourage you to review our various SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2021, and our Form 10-Qs filed on April 30, 2021 and August 12, 2021, as well as various other SEC filings made from time to time in which we discuss risk factors associated with investing in MicroVision. These risk factors could cause results to differ materially from those implied or expressed in our forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this call, and except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update this information. In addition, we will present certain financial measures on this call that will be considered non-GAAP under the SEC's Regulation G.
For reconciliations of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure as well as for all of the financial numbers presented on this call, please refer to the information included in our press release and in our Form 8-K dated and submitted to the SEC today, both of which can be found on our corporate website at ir.microvision.com under the SEC Filings tab. This conference call will be available for audio replay in the investor relations section of MicroVision's website at www.microvision.com. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Sumit Sharma. Sumit?
Thank you, Lindsey. Good afternoon, everyone. I would like to start off by walking you through our progress in the last quarter, including our product introduction at the IAA Munich Mobility Show and our priorities to frame the year ahead of us. We have made progress since our last call. In September, we introduced our lidar sensor at the Munich Mobility Show. It was a great opportunity to showcase our technology alongside our competitors. ADAS safety and the need for lidar as a central sensor was part of the story for every OEM and tier one that exhibited at the show. The largest volume opportunity and recurring revenue resides with OEM programs for automotive lidar sensors, which have been our focus for the last several years.
I can say with confidence that the race to secure an OEM program for level two plus and level three ADAS systems with lidar as the central sensor is still wide open. No lidar company has yet secured an OEM deal that is recorded on its financial statements as meaningful backlog. I believe MicroVision is ahead of all of our competitors in several key areas. Based on our work with a leading global consulting firm, we expect OEMs to make partnership decisions after careful and thorough evaluation in the next 16 months for launch of new EV models with more advanced ADAS features, which will start to ship in 2025, with a larger global rollout of battery-operated electric vehicles expected in 2026. This could represent lidar unit volumes in the millions in the future.
I am excited to report that we have received very positive feedback from our recent OEM and Tier One meetings. OEMs tell us that our sensor is of interest because it demonstrates best-in-class cost advantages, size, key features, and demonstrable scalability for production and quality requirements. We believe our hardware and software solution excel in each of these categories, and we have received acknowledgment of this in our meetings with OEMs and Tier One companies. Potential customers and partners have consistently been impressed by the compact size of our sensor and the number of features packed inside. Our capability to provide highest resolution at range with dynamic field of view and velocity field while running at 30 Hz is a major accomplishment of which we are very proud of.
The 30 Hz could enable higher speed operation of automatic emergency braking, forward collision warning, and automatic emergency steering ADAS features that are expected to be the centerpiece features for future vehicles. Our technology will also provide larger system cost savings than competitive solutions, an important factor in OEM's final decision process. An ADAS solution integrated with our lidar would require a lower number of sensors to meet ADAS safety requirements and result in a lower overall system cost compared with a sensor stack utilizing lower resolution and lower frame rate lidar solutions. Working with a leading global management consulting company has allowed us to confirm this and enable us to more widely start introducing our products to OEMs. As previously stated, we expect to demonstrate our integrated software and hardware ADAS solution by June 2022 that will demonstrate higher levels of ADAS safety features that OEMs desire.
As I recently discussed, our technology is built on well-known technologies for lasers, photodetectors, MEMS, and custom silicon components. There are no exotic materials in our sensor, so we can quite easily show our cost scalability to OEMs. MicroVision know-how is combining these standard materials with our algorithms, software, and custom silicon in what creates incredible value through our intellectual property. Additionally, with our history of delivering products for world-class customers like Microsoft for challenging applications demonstrates the pedigree of the company and provides potential customers the confidence in our ability to meet and exceed their expectations. As I frame our priorities for the next year, working to achieve an OEM or Tier One partnership remains our focus. Our team is working around the clock on polishing our sample for OEM evaluations that are expected to continue well into 2022.
The OEMs require a more specialized product for automotive ADAS than a product for the general market. Because of the large and valuable OEM opportunity ahead of us, we have decided to focus our attention on the OEM business, what we call strategic sales. We will continue to prepare a product for direct sales, but at a slower pace. We expect it will be available in the middle of 2022. I believe we need to maintain our focus on strategic sales given the timeframe for OEM decisions and the value this strategy could represent to our investors. One of the questions I often get from investors is, "Is MicroVision planning to go it alone?" Let me clarify my thoughts on this.
The opportunity for an OEM program is tremendous and represents significant value for our shareholders, but no company can go it alone in this space for such a safety-critical system. Partnerships will be required with OEMs and Tier Ones and others in their stack to be able to deliver a solution. In the near term, industry experts expect a huge amount of consolidation in the ADAS space, where recurring significant revenue is not expected until 2025 and beyond. MicroVision is in a strong position with our hardware and software built on decades of relevant development and solid intellectual property rights. Before I turn the call over to Steve to discuss Q3 results, let me comment on the CFO announcement we made last week.
I would like to start off by thanking Steve for his 8.5 years of dedication to MicroVision and helping the company navigate through challenging times to the most financially secure level it has been in its history. Steve and I have worked closely through my time at the company, and I will miss his focus and friendship. We also announced Anubhav Verma will be joining us on November 15 as our new CFO. I'm excited that he brings with him great energy and solid experience from years executing in capital markets and investment banking transactions. I'm looking forward to working with him and the expertise he will bring to our management team. In other news of interest to our shareholders, Dave Allen, MicroVision's longtime IR consultant, is retiring at the end of November.
I am very appreciative of Dave's work over the years supporting the company's communication with shareholders. He will be missed. I would like to end this update by thanking our shareholders for their enormous support and confidence in the company. I would also like to sincerely thank our employees for their continued hard work and dedication in getting us here and remaining focused on the important work ahead. Now let me turn the call over to Steve to discuss the third quarter results, and then I'll be back to provide some additional perspective. Steve?
Thank you, Sumit. Good afternoon, everyone. For the third quarter, revenue was $718,000, down slightly compared to last quarter's revenue of $746,000. All of the third quarter's revenue was royalty revenue and attributable to our augmented reality customer. As I pointed out before, royalties related to this customer will be credited against the non-refundable prepayment the customer made in 2017. Once the prepayment is exhausted, the customer will begin making cash payments for royalties due. At the end of Q3, the balance of the prepayment stood at $5.8 million. The $5.8 million is on the balance sheet as a contract liability. I'd also like to point out that there is no time limit within which the prepayment must be used.
As long as the components we develop for the customer are in production, royalty revenue will continue to be generated. Third quarter cost of revenue included a $10,000 credit related to the reversal of a warranty accrual. The result is a third quarter gross profit of $728,000. In comparison, gross profit was $777,000 in the prior quarter. Operating expenses were $10.8 million in the third quarter, which was considerably lower than our guidance of $14 million-$16 million discussed on August fourth, and lower than the $15.7 million in the prior quarter. The decrease in operating expenses from Q2 was primarily due to a decrease in share-based compensation.
Share-based compensation was lower in Q3 because Q2 had a one-time expense of $4.2 million, and some employee awards earned in Q2 were not repeated in Q3. If we subtract share-based compensation expense from operating expenses from both Q3 and Q2, operating expenses would be $8 million in Q3 and $7.8 million in Q2. Our headcount at the end of September was 83, up from 74 at the end of June. We're a little behind in our hiring plans due to the very tight labor market, but we are pleased that we were able to attract nine new employees in the quarter. We remain in a hiring mode and plan to hire more people, primarily in engineering, but we also expect to fill positions in sales and other administrative functions.
We expect by the end of the year we will have 100-110 people, a little lower than our prior guidance of 110-125. Our net loss in the third quarter was $9.4 million or $0.06 per share. In comparison, the second quarter net loss was $15 million or $0.09 per share. Because of the large swings in share-based compensation, we think it would be useful in making comparisons if we provide an adjusted EBITDA number. Adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, and share-based compensation expense. For the third quarter, adjusted EBITDA was negative $6.2 million, and for the second quarter, it was negative $6.7 million. Third quarter cash used in operations was $10 million.
In comparison, cash used in operations in the second quarter was $6.7 million. The increase is due to adding $1 million in component inventory for our long-range lidar. Also in the quarter, we paid security deposits and prepaid rent for new lidar testing and office space. Those deposits and rent came to about $1 million. Additionally, in July, we renewed our D&O insurance. Our insurance premium increased substantially due to our increased market cap and general conditions in the D&O market, and that accounted for about $900,000 in increased cash usage. Cash and equivalents at the end of the third quarter was $125.1 million, down from $135.3 million at the end of the prior quarter.
We did not raise any funds on the ATM in the third quarter or thus far in the fourth quarter. While we have not opted to utilize the ATM since the second quarter, having a strong balance sheet and the ability to raise additional funds has given confidence to prospective customers and partners that we can be a long-term player in the automotive market. Strong balance sheet also helps in retaining and attracting employees. I'd like to return to the topic of real estate leases. In September, we signed a lease for about 17,000 sq ft of space that will be used for both lidar testing and office space. We start paying rent on this space in November. Additionally, we have placed a deposit for a lease on a building next door to the testing facility.
If we are unable to complete a negotiated exit from our current lease, the deposit will be returned. If we can negotiate that exit, we will likely move our main office to the new facility in late summer or fall of 2022. The new facility is around 36,000 sq ft, and the facility we would be leaving is around 31,000 sq ft. Now I'd like to give some thoughts on our expectations for the fourth quarter. First, let's cover revenue. As Sumit mentioned, we're focusing on the automotive OEM business because of the opportunity for high levels of recurring revenue. In the short term, this effort will consume a lot of engineering resources.
As a result of this focus and the timelines that come with it, we have pushed back the start of production of lidar units for direct sales from Q4 of this year to the middle of next year. We expect Q4 revenue this year will continue to be royalty revenue in the range of $500,000-$600,000. Now for operating expenses. Q4 again will have a significant amount of share-based compensation in the range of $3 million-$3.5 million. Additionally, as we continue to hire and continue spending on materials and services, I expect to see Q4 operating expenses in the range of $11.5 million-$13 million, including the share-based compensation. Finally, cash used in operations.
In addition to the increased expenses I mentioned, we'll continue adding inventory of long lead time components for our long-range lidar. I expect to see cash used in operations in the $10 million-$11.5 million range. Finally, let me echo Sumit's excitement about our competitive position and the reception we received at the IAA Mobility Trade Show last month. You know, that show was really the first chance we had to show our hardware, and the response we received was every bit of what we hoped it would be. I'll now turn the call over to Sumit for some comments before we open the call to questions.
Thank you, Steve. Before we open the call up for questions, let me revisit a couple of important themes from this call. The strategy that I described today, though ambitious, is built on MicroVision's well-established technological depth and maturity, including our proprietary ASIC, our cost-effective components, and our demonstrated ability to productize at scale. We expect that our engagement with OEMs will continue as we support evaluations of our sensor in Q2 2022 and of our software features in Q3 2022. We believe that MicroVision will be well-positioned to support OEMs as they roll out new vehicle programs built on next-generation technology. We remain confident in our ability to successfully execute on our strategy, and I'm bullish on our future. Let's open the call for questions.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the key. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from Glenn Mattson with Ladenburg Thalmann. Please go ahead.
Yeah, hi, thanks for taking the questions. Just first, let me most importantly start off with just congratulate Steve on his, I guess his retirement, right? Just say what a pleasure it's been, you know, working with you all these years. Get that out of the way. Sumit, first, just I know it's off topic a little bit, but questions about, you know, get your thoughts on Facebook's kind of big thing today, talking about changing the name to Meta and the big move into metaverse and just, you know, whether or not you think that kind of spurs investment by some of the other competitors there in terms of just kind of the AR world.
I know that a lot of the AR and VR stocks got a boost today as a result of the news. Just, you know, just opinions on whether or not that spurs further investment from your one big customer or from other interests from other parties in the AR space.
Good question. Of course, I've just recently read about it, so I've not really processed it all. You know, Glenn, if you think about it, the bigger picture that you've talked about here is if they're going out there announcing all the things they audaciously, aspirationally wanna build out, it's gonna take significant amount of investment. That includes hardware, software, platforms. I think what's exciting about that news when I read it was that, you know, a big company with, you know, hundreds of billion dollars in market cap is willing to say, and, you know, they're generating cash, that they wanna actually invest in there. Again, these kind of platforms, these kind of spaces, when one big party makes investments, others do as well. I'm excited for this space. I've always been excited for this space.
I've always said that it's gonna be something big, but at the right time. It's good to see that a big company like Meta, the new company like Meta, is gonna be making investments and strides into that space.
Great. Yeah, thanks. On the shift you talked about today to focus more on OEM versus, you know, direct sales of sensors on that front. Just, you know, a little bit more on the color. I mean, I guess obviously longer term OEM is a bigger opportunity. You know, I guess the thought would be seeing some progress on, so seeing some sales in the short term would be like more of a signaling device for investors and people like that to kind of just get a sense of the acceptance of the products in the marketplace or, you know, that would kind of be helpful in some sense. But, you know, ancillary to the big mission, which is to get, you know, into large design wins and things like that.
Just a little bit more on the give and take on your thought process there. You know, thinking about the fact that you talk about having product available kind of middle of next year now, is that? Should we start to model in kind of thinking about not seeing any product revenue until that point in time, or should there be some sample revenue for some of these OEM opportunities that are out there?
Yeah, I think that's a good way to think about it. I think, you know, the sample revenue is like incidental. You know, think about what I just talked about, that there's, you know, working with a global management consulting firm, making sure that all the data the market has, that we are up to speed on that one to make sure that we're aligned. That, you know, try to minimize, reduce as many surprises as they come in these kind of endeavors. 16 months ahead of us is where some of these key decisions are getting made. It is important for us to focus on that and not let that opportunity pass us by. Now, strategic sales represent the biggest revenue, recurring revenue for any company in this space. All companies are hyper-focused on that. It's not just MicroVision.
All companies are hyper-focused on that because it is the biggest prize. Now, when you think about direct sales or I think a common term that people are coalescing around is spot sales. Those are incidental, right? They go up and down and they have market acceptance. We're gonna do that as well. But to start something like that, you have to focus the team on addressing that to the market. It is not just something you're, you know, software that you're selling. You're selling hardware and software and partnerships. So it would take quite a lot of effort, and I wanted to make sure that the company focused on the strategic side of it because we do have a significant advantage. I'm just more enthusiastic about it after Munich than ever.
I mean, clearly from a hardware standpoint, we are heads and shoulders above in size and performance than anybody else, and cost advantages and the key features. We really have all the things that everybody was looking for. Anybody that read anything about it or visited the Munich show can probably like, you know, attest to this where, you know, our competitors are showing things that are the size of like a VHS you know recorder. Here we are a VHS cassette, you know, so the sensor size, the cost, the technology, we actually are ahead than our competitors, and it's obvious to the market right now. Therefore, for us to focus on the biggest opportunity in the world right now in this space, I think is the most prudent thing that we're doing.
As far as the sales, yeah, those are things that, you know, are there, but we wanna focus the team on the big things, given the fact that next 16 months are gonna be very, very active.
Great. Thanks for that. Last question for me. You talked about burning $10 million-$11.5 million next quarter. I imagine that's gonna kinda quarter as the hiring picks up pace and the investment in the sales and in engineering, everything else. You know, that equates to somewhere to the tune of $50-ish million between now and the end of next year in kinda cash burn. Last quarter you talked about having exhausted half the current ATM, and that you thought that it was important to have a lot of cash on the balance sheets so that people know that you're serious and in here for the long term or whatever. What level of cash is necessary?
Just maybe some of the thought process on why you didn't tap the ATM in the current quarter? Thanks.
Yeah. You know, I think what the sense is, we would like to use the balance of it, but we just don't have any definitive plans. As in the quarter, we just didn't have, you know, open windows for us that we thought made sense at the time.
Thanks. Is there a level of cash that you feel like you wouldn't wanna go below or anything like that? Or is that, you know, so far below what you currently have?
No, I don't have a specific number in mind, but I think, you know, what we see is a change in the conversation. You know, when some of these conversations were happening before this ATM and the raise that we did in Q2, the going nature of the company and our longevity was an issue, and that seems to have become now a non-issue. We just wanna be mindful of making sure that that's the way the company appears and the company stays that way.
To state the obvious.
Great. Thanks.
People wanna do business with people that are gonna be around for years. Right, Glenn?
Great. That's it for me. Thanks, guys.
Okay. Thanks, Glenn.
The next question comes from Sam Peterman with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead.
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I just thought I'd ask one or two on lidar to start here. You guys probably saw the GM had Investor Day the other week, and they talked a lot about their new Ultra Cruise product, which I believe is gonna standardize lidar, at least in certain models that are featuring Ultra Cruise. I was curious, can you just talk about, you know, any more or I guess just in the industry broadly, are you seeing more OEMs wanting to adopt lidar? Can you talk about kinda how the trend is changing there over the last few months, especially with that GM announcement the other week? Thanks.
Yeah. Yeah, that's a good question. I think, the eye-opening part is actually public. You know, Munich was one of the first auto shows since COVID, so let's not forget that. You know, every OEM, every tier one, if you visited with them, every model they were showing, they would show where a lidar would be placed inside the car. In most cases, some of the lidars they were showing were not even operational. They were just showing like a mock-up. It clearly showed that every product they're talking about that will have these higher level ADAS safety features, there's a lidar as a central feature as part of that. Now, you're talking about OEMs that ship in the tens of millions of units per year. You know, their strategy is pretty well known.
OEMs that support them, every one of those OEMs, that the top tier one OEMs and the mid-tier, tier one OEMs, they all had a lidar as part of their product offering. It's everywhere. You know, I think, you know, ADAS safety is coming as more battery operated electric vehicles become commonplace. Higher levels of safety is a central feature that is the real value proposition for them, and lidar will be required for them. I think like the Ultra Cruise is an interesting product. You say it's standard, but yet it's selected lidar. But if you look at the features of Super Cruise, the Ultra Cruise, I mean, the Ultra Cruise is needing the lidar, actually.
Again, it's starting to happen in the premium models, but over the period of the next several years, you'll start seeing it across the board on different programs.
Okay, that's great. Just talk about that Munich show. I mean, when OEMs are showing you where the lidar is going, obviously there's a lot of spots that different OEMs seem to be looking at, whether that's windshield or roof, or in the headlamps or, you know, on the corners. Is there any particular place that, you know, MicroVision's lidar couldn't go? Or are there particular places that you think you integrate well into? Any color on that?
With the smaller size that we have, we integrate a lot of different places. That's one of the nicer options for the design teams. Let's not forget, cars are beautiful. Cars have to have a certain shape and line to them. The design teams are very particular about what they wanna incorporate. Having a lidar that can fit in the headlamp, behind the windshield, within any part of the body, gives a lot of flexibility. That's actually a huge benefit to our technology that nobody else can demonstrate working today. They are years away from that, from anybody's speculation.
Okay, thanks for that perspective. I think last one for me. There's been, you know, continued activity in the industry with, you know, new lidar companies coming public and acquisitions being made and, you know, Quanergy's trying to go public with the optical phased array technology. Ouster just bought Sense, which is making flash lidar. I guess my question is, do you guys see a trend towards kind of next gen technologies taking hold at all? Or do you think the, you know, the MEMS approach that you're going with is still more than sufficient and is gonna beat those technologies?
I mean, not because that I get the opportunity to lead a MEMS-based company, but honestly, I can say that MEMS technology will see a lot of traction because it's the most obvious thing that can scale, has to be cost effective, and something that will show the reliability for, you know, 15+ years worth of life, which is what's required for safety. If you think about all kind of different steering systems, optical phased array, flash-based, all of them have benefits, but all of them have detriments. You really have to do a cost analysis and a risk analysis of what will happen. You know, a question that came up recently, and I think I wanna add that here, is like, you know, somebody asked me, "Well, what about the flash-based technology, right? Isn't that better?
You know, have a global shutter instead of rolling shutter? Well, most of the things in your life are rolling shutter, by the way. Put that aside. Imagine two vehicles, and they're flashing at each other. Dropping one single frame, dropping several frames, that actually causes a problem with the software, right? You need significant more software to be able to fill in the gaps. Again, now you're leaving the realm of actual data versus something the software is saying, How do you believe it? You would need redundancy. You need more software. Effectively, the system cost goes up. Those flash-based systems are running at 24 hertz, and that's considered, you know, cutting edge. Everybody wants 30 hertz. 30 hertz is at the latency where the automotive system is more effective than a human.
When you think about 10 hertz system, 15 hertz system, the question always is like, "Well, aren't they all the same?" The answer is like, "No." This is all about latency. How much better is the system in responding at speeds to a human? If the other lidar systems at lower frame rates are not able to actually show that working, that's a big advantage we'll have. I think consolidation, that will continue to happen. I think even though somebody's making a bet in a SPAD array and wants to spend $hundreds of millions worth of investment to make custom VCSELs, custom SPADs, and investors wanna support it, more power to them, right? Our story is much simpler. You know, the stuff sells itself. You know, I'm not even a good sales guy, I would say.
I open up the thing, and I show them inside and remind them, everything in here is things you know. There's plastic, there's metal, there's known silicon technology that's a 200-millimeter wafer, sensor technology, a 300-millimeter wafer, lasers that you can buy. It's all the stuff that you know. It's stuff that they have in their vehicles now. What's magical about it is, you know, how MicroVision uses our IP to develop a product. Therefore, the cost-effective nature of it and the scalability is there. It makes it much more palatable to them that, you know, these are things that they understand and know. Think about a new technology, you know, phased array, you know, metamaterials, I mean, goes on and on. The path for those things is gonna be harder because they're more novel.
The path for MicroVision is gonna be less because it's proven technology. I believe strongly that the path that we have chosen is gonna bear fruit.
Okay, thanks for the perspective. That's all for me.
Thank you.
Thank you. Anyone participating through the webcast can submit a question by using the Submit a Question box on your screen. I'll now turn the call back to Steve Holt to begin answering submitted questions through the webcast.
Okay, we're gonna respond to some of the 150-plus questions we've also received via e-mail. Many of the questions are variations on the same topic, and many of the questions were addressed in our prepared remarks. We tried to consolidate these questions down on the same topic to address the basic issue. We won't be able to answer every question submitted, but we will go through some of them here, and then we'll open up the call to investors. The first question is, Sumit, can you give some detail on why you think the MicroVision lidar sensor is best in class?
I think I covered this in the call today and, the last question with Sam, but, let me iterate that. Let's think about, like, four categories in which, you know, you would wanna sort all the sensor companies and figure out, like, what's best about them. Believe it or not, for OEMs, the number one is actually cost. Every conversation starts with understanding scalability of the technology and what will be the cost for the sensor, but really the cost of the delivered system that will deliver the ADAS to them. There's things from a cost standpoint, as I just said, right? Things inside that are predictable. When we actually talk about some cost numbers, projection in the future to a level of economy of scale, it's much more believable.
These are things that can be verified because there's fabs out there. You know, these things are pretty easily reconciled. But the cost of a system is the interesting part. So think about when you have a vehicle like this, you'll have a lidar, you'll have, you know, some lower quantities of other sensor stacks, including radar and camera modules and the ECU. Ultimately, our lidar with the high resolution, some of the features, key features that we've developed, allow the system cost that they are forecasting today to be reduced. Through our partnership with our global consulting management companies, what we found is that our system put inside a level two plus a level three would be absolutely competitive to today's prices offered by camera module-based systems.
Think about the cost competitiveness. You know, we have advanced technologies that are competitive today, which is also the bigger market. This means that the market that MicroVision technology could address is significantly wider than just what's in the future for level three or level two plus. Cost is a big one. I would say clearly, like, you know, very, very confidently, I can say this, and I've checked it, that very confident that when it comes to cost, best in class, hands down. Next one is size, right? So as I said, you know, people still wanna buy vehicles and if they buy a vehicle, the design of the car is actually important, right? The beauty of it is still in the lines of the vehicle.
Having a sensor that meets the cost requirements and fits inside the body of the car in all different places based on what the OEM need for flexibility, that's important. This was apparent when we were at the show that, you know, everybody, all our competitors showing up hardware publicly. The number one thing when any OEM or Tier 1 visited us, one of the first responses to them was like, "Wow, it really is very nice and small and tiny." We went through and talked about it and they were very impressed. You know, seeing the live demo, seeing some of the other road testing data that we demonstrated and the hardware there.
You know, I think, so clearly, like, the size of it actually makes a big difference and is a big advantage for us. Anybody that's been in hardware in the industry will tell you that if you're showing hardware like our competitors were, that are significantly larger, to reduce that takes several years and significant amount of investment. But for us, we're already there. This is another big advantage that we have. Again, I would consider it best in class because of that, and that was demonstrated publicly as well. The third one, of course, you know, it does matter what the features are. It does matter the range and the point cloud density and the frame rate and things like dynamic field of view. You know, our team has labored on defining these features and executing on them.
I can honestly tell you, years ago, you know, 2019, when I actually went on the road and actually shared these features we intended to create with these OEMs, first of all, they were surprised that we actually had such a deep understanding of what was required. After that, they were actually really impressed that anybody could even take on an ambitious goal to produce something like this. We did it, we demonstrated it, and I think the impression is now that having these features inside, it is reasonable for them to actually say that other sensors as part of the stack could be removed, therefore reducing the overall system cost. If you have a lidar that allows to reduce not just the future cost of our lidar, but also their system, that's how they reach economy of scale.
That's how they will have more models that they can actually put this onto. That's an exciting thing. This is how to think about features, right? It's not about, you know, this feature versus X feature. You know, one OEM may value range more, the other one, values resolution more. The third one may value some combination, right? We can support all of them from the same hardware. That's a very, very big thing. We're not tied down. As you mentioned, right, our team works very hard to polish the features and make sure that the OEMs, they get to see what's important to them. From the same hardware, you know, we're able to do that. That's actually a pretty big win for us. Again, best in class.
We don't have to develop a new product to satisfy their needs of understanding what's possible. The last one I would say, maturity of technology. As I said, things that I'm talking about, things that this company's had, have a long history. We have history with, you know, big companies like Microsoft and Sony and others that we have demonstrated it at scale. Really, regardless of, you know, how much revenue this company has generated in its history, the core technology maturity has been demonstrated. That's actually a big part because that makes it believable. That's a partnership that people would want. Again, I believe very strongly that, you know, our maturity of technology is significantly higher for a silicon-based system.
You know, people can have galvos and other kind of beam sharing technologies, but none of those are as mature and as cost effective. So if you take all of these four legs of the table, you need all four to have a very, very secure product and you know, to make the claim you're best in class. I'm very confident that I can say that, you know, we are best in class compared to any lidar company out there at the moment.
Thanks. Second question, is that on a previous call, we talked about our ability to output axial, lateral, and vertical velocity of moving objects. Other lidar companies seem to be making similar claims about those abilities. What can you tell us about MicroVision's capabilities and the capabilities of others in this space?
It's a good question, actually. The number 1 thing to think about is the latency we talked about, the low latency system. The 30 hertz number is very important. For safety, you're gonna have to make decisions faster than a human would. You need a system that's operating at like around 30 hertz, where that's about, what, 33, 34, maybe 35 milliseconds. The refresh rate is so fast, it's important to see everything in the field of view and to be able to predict what will happen in the next 30 milliseconds. Giving that information to the central computer allows them to predict what to do with the maneuvering that they're about to start. How much to steer, which way to go, slow down, speed up. These decisions have to happen at a very fast pace.
Velocity is actually a very big component of it. In a lidar, just knowing exactly where the point cloud is, very important. Additionally, and probably more important, is exactly where the velocity of that cluster of point cloud is going. You may not know if it's a motorcycle or a Mini Cooper or a Escalade. It does not matter. It matters that those cluster point clouds, you predict where they will be in the next 30 milliseconds, 60, 90, and so on. As you're maneuvering, you can predict where you will end up and is there any way you can avoid them. If you think about these prediction things, velocity is a big part of it.
The way we do velocity, of course, is since we have high frame rate, we, you know, we have our software that's gonna be, you know, of course, be condensed down into our ASIC eventually. Velocity output is happening continuously. Cluster velocity output is gonna happen continuously. We're also gonna be able to give lateral and axial, meaning in the direction of the motion of your vehicle and 90 degrees to it. You need both of these components. The third one, vertical, is little because, you know, cars don't bounce up and down too much, but, you know, it'll be there, but it'll be kind of noisy. If you only had one of those, your prediction is always gonna be off, so you need more sensors. Your sensor stack cost goes up.
From a single sensor, we're able to do both axial and lateral, and that is a first. So far, we have not seen anybody talk about it at 30 hertz to be able to do that. I'm not really sure if I've actually seen any lidar company claim that at 30 hertz they can do both, which is what the OEMs have required.
All right. Next question is about just asking generally about employee morale at MicroVision. You know, first, we have a really great team at MicroVision. You know, Sumit and I are always amazed at the capabilities and the creativity and the dedication of the people here. We think morale is good and we're really thankful that, you know, turnover has not been a big issue for us. We think morale is good. The next question is on the ATM. Just lots of different questions about the ATM. As I said in my prepared remarks, the ATM gives potential customers and suppliers, employees, and prospective employees confidence in our ability to be a long-term partner in the automotive lidar space.
That is important in when we're talking about the businesses we're talking to. The ATM with Craig-Hallum was not used in the third quarter, and $70 million remains available on it. As I said last quarter, we'd like to complete the raise on that ATM, but don't have any definite plans as to when we would do that. I'll also point out that under the ATM agreement with Craig-Hallum, Craig-Hallum is not allowed to short MicroVision stock. There's some general questions about the IAA Auto Show in Munich and, you know, any additional color you can provide about it, and the response we received. I know we've talked about this a fair amount. I don't know if there's anything else you have to add.
No, I think Steve, as Mark, you put it the best, that the reaction that we had hoped, that we expected to get, we received it across the board. Very welcoming to show it publicly and, you know, get a lot of praise from, you know, OEMs and Tier 1s. It was a great experience.
Okay. Next question relates to other verticals. When people talk about other verticals with us, we're typically talking about augmented reality or interactive display products. What's the status of these verticals? Are you actively pursuing or investing in them now?
As we have shared in the previous calls, you know, our focus and effort has remained on the automotive lidar since I've taken over. I think I've been pretty clear about it for the last 18 months. But I've also said that, you know, I believe that we are so far ahead in those verticals of anything that the market is offering, and we stand ready to work with any partner as they come along. You know, we put together our BD team. As you know, we've just hired our first VP of BD under my tenure in Germany. Of course, we're also looking to, you know, expand that in the U.S. I think as these markets are developing, you know, we stand ready. We know all the players.
They know us. Right now our focus remains solely on the automotive lidar, given the fact the opportunity is so big and it is right in front of us.
Yeah. Well, that was a good segue. The next question was about the business development staffing. You know, first, as Sumit said, Thomas Luce coming on board has been. He's making a big impact already, and we're just real excited that he's with the company. He's working on adding to the European team. As Sumit said, we're continuing to look for folks to expand the North American team in the near future. What can you tell us about how lidar operates in inclement weather?
It's a good question. Just let me give some context. If you think about systems that are shipping right now, you know, they have some level of sensor fusion. What I can tell you, depending on the OEM's vehicle that you have, they all have some restrictions. Based on a weather condition, you can't use the feature. Because of regulations, right, there are some limitations of what features, you know, within what range they can be operated. Those are part of today's reality. As you can imagine, that's, you know, not gonna go, right? Effectively, if you're gonna have an ADAS safety feature, it has to work always. Your airbags work all the time. Your ABS brakes work all the time. Therefore, an ADAS feature has to work all the time.
When you think about a lidar, this is a question I got quite often also at in Munich. These are 905 nanometer laser. What happens in rain? I think I've answered this before. The density of point cloud is so high that if, let's say, there was a raindrop that hits one of our pulses and that one is gone, there's still significant amount of other pulses that you know you can drive from. You will still get you know very high quality data. Unless you were driving through, like, a sheet of water, like a waterfall, right? That's not realistic, let's be honest. Lidar by themselves are gonna be able to operate that. There is no magic saying that 905 will not be there.
What I can tell you is the most investment and the most interest people get is when I say the words that we have 905 nanometer lasers. OEMs that have looked at this problem are not shying away from that because they do understand that this is a sensor fusion problem, that, you know, once we have our software integrating radar and, you know, and them integrating other parts of it, those products by themselves are gonna be significantly more valuable because they will solve the problem. You have redundancy, and you will still have the sensor that's able to provide it. So when you think about range and resolution, those are actually big things. So when you have a company that says, "Well, 1 million points per second is good enough, you know.
We're looking good here." That's not true, actually, because that's not what OEM wants. Consistently, I can tell you, we always get, you know, these RFIs, and I recently saw one where they wanted even a higher resolution. They wanna explore it. Of course, you know, we wanna support that, and our system can do that when we, you know, respond to those. It's amazing to me that, you know, the weather, you know, is an issue now. Would a regulatory body ever let this system be operational in whiteout snow conditions? I can't answer that. That's really for the regulatory bodies, right? You can imagine that over a period of time, these sensor suites are gonna be has to be more and more sophisticated.
As we sit today, there is no impediment for us to see a path to adoption.
Okay. The last question we have before we take some more live questions relates to the lidar software. You know, you talked about lidar, the software component of our product. You know, what can you tell us about our lidar software?
Our lidar software, this is the key. You know, this is a very bright jewel in the crown for MicroVision. This is something that all of us should care a great deal about, and I'm very, very excited about this. We're working on something that would allow OEMs to start evaluating a system where more of the load from their computing can be shifted into our ASIC, to our algorithms that we've already developed, that we are gonna develop and we're gonna actually demonstrate. This is what the exciting news about the June 2022 timeline that I talked about previously and also touched upon today is. That actually is a very, very big deal for us in the future. Having a big software component besides our hardware component makes the company a lot more valuable.
Having our custom ASIC and software story getting solidified, that's important to all of us. What's in those features? I think it's more. We're gonna demonstrate it. I think we don't want our competition to listen to our earnings call and understand what features are coming in the future. I can clearly say that, I think I hope I've demonstrated over the last 18 months that I have good insight into what's happening in this industry, and I can say with confidence that we are on a very good path. Our global management consulting partner also has vetted this out with us, of course, but also with OEMs, and they strongly agree with me that this is something that's gonna be pretty impressive.
All right. Thanks. Okay, let's now take some live questions from investors.
Thank you. As a reminder, please press star then one to be joined to the question queue. The first question comes from Ty Bordner with Newsworthy Private Investors. Please go ahead.
Okay, thanks. Hey, first of all, congratulations to Steve and also Dave Allen for your impending retirement. Thanks for everything you guys have done over the years. Appreciate that. Sumit, in your prepared remarks, you referenced a focus which I think is on OEMs, you know, I would say versus tier ones or even mobility as a service companies. Maybe you can help add some color to that. I think you labeled it just in terms of the labeling, strategic versus direct. Maybe you can also, you know, label some or put some color into those words as well.
Okay. When you think about the OEM, of course, you know, those are the cars that we will buy. Tier 1 and OEM are connected. No company is gonna be able to ship their product directly to the OEM. They're gonna have to work with an approved Tier 1 to supply because the Tier 1 is the one that actually does the manufacturing of most of those modules for the OEM. Our go-to-market strategy is pretty straightforward, and it's similar to lots of other people. We focus our energies and our efforts and our attention toward OEM to make sure they understand the gravity of the problems that we've already solved for them.
We also work with tier one because we know at some point we're gonna have to have a tier one partnership that we expect to be favorable to MicroVision after all the innovations that we've done that allows us to ship that product for OEM programs. We are not endeavoring to become a tier one. That's just not who we are, and that's not what any company should be thinking about. Well, people can think what they want, but that's not what we're gonna think about. Whenever you talk to an OEM, they always wanna know your structure and how you'd wanna work with a tier one in that case, and we're well aligned with their expectations. Think about OEM and tier one together.
Okay.
They are focused on ADAS. I'm sorry. Go ahead, Tai.
No. Right. ADAS. Right. It's a little confusing. Ultimately, I guess it sounds like you pitch to the OEMs, but then almost they direct you to the tier ones for, you know, I don't know, manufacturing production. Is that right? Or, you know, how should we think about that?
Yeah, I'm not gonna comment on that because, you know, every tier one, you know, think about it. There's a certain amount of margin they're gonna pay. We think. I think we've done some great work here. Our goal is to be part of that and make sure that the margin stacks in our favor, right, Tai?
Mm-hmm.
You know, that's where what you wanna do is if you get adopted, you know, if the OEM believes that you have the right solution for what they need and they wanna work with you and your technology, there's a thing called direct buy. You know, a tier one will have to work with you and strike a deal that makes sense, right? You know, none of these deals that anybody would do or we would do in the future would be exclusive with one tier one. We would find the most favorable deal for our investors, and OEMs know this as well.
Okay.
The important thing is they don't adopt because just of one factor, right? A tier one, they themselves don't know which one to pick. They want the OEM to make the choice, and they wanna go work out a deal. As I said, you're part of a group, you're gonna be in the stack, and you have to work with them, and there'll be other partnerships you have to prepare for.
Okay. Well, it sounds like you gotta convince the OEM.(crosstalk)
Before you go on, I wanted to add one more thing(crosstalk). Your first question was, what about mobility as a service? This OEM tier one is ADAS.
Right.
Mobility as a service companies are primarily focused on autonomous driving, level 5, and they're much more aspirational, as in, like, it could be 10 or 20 years before real products are being fielded out there, or six years in trucking or three years, you know, whatever number some of these companies are saying. Okay?
Okay.
They're two different. The biggest prize that gets confirmed by multiple people globally is the OEM. 90-100 million cars shipping in the next five years.
Yeah. It sounds like you gotta convince the OEM or OEMs that, you know, you're the right product, and then they sort of direct the tier ones to go and make it all happen. Is that-
That's correct.
Kinda right?
Yes.
Yeah. Okay.
Yeah.
Okay. Second question I have is you use the term partnerships. It says partnerships will be looking at your prepared remarks. Partnerships will be required with OEMs and tier ones and others in their stack to be able to deliver a solution. You also, in the very next sentence, talk about a huge amount of consolidation. Maybe you can comment on what do you mean by partnership, exactly? Then you refer to consolidation again. Maybe talk about both of those.
If you think about partnerships, I think, you know, how do people create and partner with each other? You know, clearly, you know, we develop the hardware. We invest a lot of money in it. We develop software, invest a lot of money, silicon. Lots of this is in our IP. All companies are looking for recurring revenue that support, you know, significant multiples to their market cap, right? Obvious thing to say here, we're a high growth company, so it's kind of important for us to strike a business, set a business deal that allows us to actually stand up for that. When I think about partnerships, it's about how do you partner with each other. If we are the ones that have developed the technology and we're the experts at it, right, how will we participate of how that thing gets manufactured?
How does the revenue gets, you know, split? You know, how does the margin get split, right? We wanna be in controlling. I believe by us owning all our IP, we're in a controlling position, and we have to just, you know, demonstrate to the OEM how we can, you know, partner with them and solve their problems with them or already have solved their problems with them.
All right. Yeah, go ahead.
What was the second part of your question? Actually, I just recall there was another part of the question I did not answer yet, but go ahead. Can you repeat it?
Well, the very next sentence in your prepared remarks.
Consolidation. Yeah.
Talks about consolidation. Yeah. Right.
All right. Micro is a public company, so at any given time, if somebody feels that, you know, like somebody is looking for a lighter company, a big company with lots of money, I think we're available. If the gravity of the problem you solve determines what the future growth of the company would've been, you know, I mean, think about, terminal value to be established right now, but the market is just so big. For us to work feverishly hard, and why focus all our attention on the OEM to get that recognition is more valuable to our shareholders than any kind of spot sales or direct sales like I talked about. Why focus the company on that?
Because establishing that, you know, by doing that, our products, our technology would have a ten-year or multiple years worth of decades worth of future. That has more value to the shareholders. Direct sales? Yeah. We're gonna do direct sales, right? But those are spot sales. You know, those are periodic and non-recurring.
Okay. Last question. In your InvestorPlace interview the other day, you just said investors need to remain patient, which, you know, as a long-term investor, it makes sense. Of course, we're all looking for, you know, a deal, right? With respect to a deal, what, you know, are some milestones or events that we can, as investors, use to track progress over the next near- to midterm?
I think we're just gonna focus on the OEM business, and as things materialize, Ty, we're gonna talk about it publicly. Honestly, if there was anything that I wanted the shareholders to track that would be valuable, I would have put it in the call today.
Okay. All right. Thank you. Appreciate it.
The next question comes from James Groninger with is a private investor.
My question concerns any developments that you may have made to date on non-recurring engineering. Does that look like an area you can use to focus on the OEMs? And as you know, working on several non-recurring engineering programs may be a way for you to develop some simpatico or some credibility as those move forward. Have you kind of dropped that strategy?
No. As our go-to-market strategy is that we're gonna face them, we're gonna work with them and show them the solution. I expect there may be some NREs, may be some non-recurring engineering programs that may come along. I don't think that we have put it aside. I think we are actively pursuing any kind of engagement with OEMs.
Okay. Thank you.
This concludes our question and answer session and concludes the conference call. Thank you for attending today's presentation.