Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Inotiv Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question- and- answer session. If, at any time during this call you require immediate assistance, please press star zero for the operator. This call is being recorded on Thursday, August 10, 2023. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Bob Yedid. Thank you. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, thank you everyone for joining today's call with Inotiv's management team. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that some of the statements that management will make on this call are considered forward-looking statements, including statements about the company's future operating and financial results and plans. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or achievements to be materially different from those projected. Any such statements represent management's expectations as of today's date. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and the company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Please refer to the company's SEC filings for further guidance on this matter. Management will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures in an effort to provide additional information for investors.
Definition of these non-GAAP measures and reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measures are included in the company's earnings release, which has been posted to the Investors section of the company's website, www.inotivco.com, It's also available in the Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If you haven't obtained a copy of today's press release, you may do so by going to the Investors section of Inotiv's website. Joining us from the company this afternoon are Bob Leasure, President and Chief Executive Officer; Beth Taylor, Chief Financial Officer; and John Sagartz, the company's Chief Strategy Officer. Bob will begin with some opening remarks, after which Beth will present a summary of the company's financial results, Then we'll open the call for questions from our analysts. It's my pleasure to turn the call over to Bob Leasure, CEO.
Bob, please go ahead.
Thank you, Bob, and good afternoon, everyone. Before we dive into the quarter's results, I want to start the call by framing some of our efforts today, noting how far we've come in the last few years and how we position ourselves to continue to execute on our plans and goals. Our investments and growth have been guided by seven strategically planned key objectives. First, rightsize the infrastructure. After several acquisitions, we are currently in the final stages of optimizing our infrastructure, rightsizing the company's global footprint in order to improve client service and program management, as well as competitively position our company as a mid-sized, full-service CRO research model and data provider. We feel that completing this objective will allow us to compete even more effectively with smaller as well as larger CRO and research model providers.
Second, we reduce the dependency on third-party providers and focus on becoming a full-service provider. In order to meet our clients' needs, we developed internal capabilities, both organically and through acquisitions, and in doing so, we have been able to reduce our reliance on third parties for external services. This, in turn, reduces costs but also enhances speed, quality, overall value for our customers. We expect this will support continued gross margin improvements. Third, strategic capital investments. Our capital investments have included updating our global technology, which was appropriate and necessary now that Inotiv is a significantly larger organization. We've also updated our Enterprise Resource Planning and Customer Relationship Management systems, as well as our enterprise solution and laboratory systems for managing preclinical studies and our labs.
Additionally, we are committed to addressing deferred maintenance and acquired sites and expanding acquired facilities to allow for growth and leveraging our fixed cost structure. Fourth, rebranding. We've rebranded our services business as Inotiv, and we are driven by a philosophy that customers should expect more from their CRO and to further the awareness that we now provide a more complete spectrum of services. Fifth, animal welfare. We are passionate regarding our continued commitment to and standards for animal welfare. This has included focusing increased monies and attention to retain experienced and caring staff, recruiting and retaining talented and passionate leadership, providing appropriate training, implementing our site optimization plan, and making investments in facilities when required. Sixth, workplace satisfaction. We have worked diligently to foster a positive and entrepreneurial work environment around our shared purpose of helping clients bring life-saving therapies to people around the world.
This shared purpose, combined with fair compensation, goes a long way to recruiting and retaining top talent. To this end, we are very proud to have been selected as the recipient of Energage's Top Workplaces USA award earlier this year, and have seen significant improvement in our ability to recruit and retain people. Seventh, supply chain synergies. We've been working with our supply chain and vendors to generate synergies from increased volumes, from acquisitions, and a broader range of services. This has led to additional vendors and alternative supply opportunities, which enables cost reductions from greater purchasing power that we continue to realize. I also think it's important to iterate, reiterate briefly how the company has evolved over the past six years and how our focus on these key objectives, on today, have prepared us for the next chapter of our story.
Early 2018, with two locations and 120 people, the company was firmly focused on preclinical safety assessment segment of the drug development market. In 2018 and 2019, we completed several acquisitions and began to develop new services organically. That organization became Inotiv in 2019, targeting small to mid-sized biopharma companies that our clients believed were being underserved by larger CROs. Over the next four years, some of these organically grown service offerings included safety pharmacology, juvenile toxicology, SEND reporting, clinical pathology, biotherapeutics, and genetic toxicology. Expanding our range of services has now enabled us to reduce our reliance on third-party suppliers to meet our clients' needs, enhance margins, and improve the overall value provided to our customers.
In 2021, we began to further expand our offering through the acquisitions, which not only enhanced Inotiv's preclinical services, but also provided a strong foundation to build our discovery-based platform. In fiscal year 2022, we secured access to key research models to support and complement our DSA services and became a major supplier of both small and large research models and diets through the acquisition of Envigo, and subsequently, two other critical research model providers. Acquiring these businesses enhanced our ability to access critical research models and address the major risk we identified in the supply chain. These acquisitions provided our customers with additional confidence in our ability to meet their needs, which is even more important now that access to NHPs is limited.
Since the expansion into research model business, we prioritized improvements in animal care and welfare by enlarging our veterinary team, consolidating facilities, which allowed us to make significant infrastructure improvements in the remaining facilities. Ultimately, we believe these efforts will allow us to increase our margins, remain competitive with regards to new business development, while continuing our key strategic objective of enhancing animal welfare. Today, through these acquisitions and the eight organically developed service offerings, we now currently operate 24 sites across the U.S. and Europe, serving over 3,000 customers, employing over 2,200 professionals worldwide, including industry-recognized experts across a wide range of scientific disciplines. We have evolved into a CRO with the ability to serve clients who require a full breadth of products and services, and are going to work for delivering those services with a personal touch and being highly responsive with scientific credibility.
We still have room for improvement, but we get better every month, and we believe we will be much better in the future. If you haven't done so recently, I encourage you to review the solutions page of our Inotiv website. There you'll find a comprehensive suite of discovery, preclinical, and clinical safety assessment services, and an extensive offering of standard and custom research models, support services, diets, and bedding for research and development. At present, Inotiv has become an organization that enables clients to advance programs from concept to clinic by strategically filling the gaps with our spectrum of services and products. Our story is shifting to Inotiv's next chapter, and our strategy will continue to evolve in 2023, and further take shape in 2024, as we plan to further improve our service levels, profitability, and continue our growth.
With this in mind, let's get to the financial results. Year-to-date 2023 revenues were $431.7 million, which are up 9% versus the same period last year. Our revenue for the last nine months for our discovery and safety assessment and research models and services grew 11% and 8% respectively, as compared to the same period a year ago. The third quarter of 2023 was the strongest performing quarter of the fiscal year, with revenues of $157.5 million. For Q3 2023 versus Q3 2022, revenues were down 9% year-over-year. However, it was our first quarter of profitability.
DSA revenue decreased 5% year-over-year in Q3, primarily driven by our discovery services, which we believe is a result of the decline in the overall biotech funding in the market, plus the timing of some general toxicology services. Somewhat offset by increased revenues from general- from the genetic toxicology services in connection with the new business at our Rockville facility. RMS revenue for the quarter was down 10%, mainly due to significantly reduced volume of NHP and a small, and small animal sales, somewhat offset by increased pricing. Integration plans remained on target for this quarter. This has been important to increase effectiveness and reduce our costs. We have previously announced nine site closures and completed eight as planned by the end of this June. The ninth previously announced planned closure is Blackthorn facility in the U.K.
This consolidation into Hillcrest is expected to be finalized by the end of Q3 of next year. In addition, we are closing a small facility in Spain, which is now substantially complete. We will relocate our facility in Everett, Washington, to our expanding operations in Fort Collins, Colorado, which we expect to complete in fiscal Q1 of 2024. Over the last 12 months, we have largely now completed nine of the 11 closures, mainly by consolidating the operations of these closed facilities into existing operations. Moreover, most of the planned expansions are now also completed. The final expansion in Fort Collins remains on track to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. We already have work booked to fill this increased capacity and expect revenue to begin in Q1 for fiscal 2024.
We are now focused on the sale of assets from sites which were closed, including Boyertown and Cumberland, along with our Israeli businesses, which are under contract, and negotiations are ongoing regarding the sale of other locations in Haslett, Michigan, Spain, France, and Blackthorn in the U.K. We believe these asset sales may potentially be completed over the next two to three quarters. Our integration efforts and site closures have also given us the opportunity to restructure our transportation system for research models business, which is currently in process. In addition to improved margins related to consolidating our operations, we also believe the sale of the sites planned for closure will generate additional cash for the company.
From the perspective of future growth, we will focus on optimizing operations with our new facility footprint, realizing the benefits from the investments recently made at many of our sites, which will also allow us to bring more service capabilities online. Overall, we expect to grow our DSA business from $160 million in 2022 to an estimated $180 million in 2023, to an excess of $200 million in 2024. We ultimately believe these DSA expansion projects we've just recently completed, will allow us to grow our DSA sales by 40%-50% above the 2022 DSA sales levels, allow us to leverage our DSA fixed cost structure and infrastructure.
We also anticipate we have capacity to grow the RMS business and expect to reduce our RMS expenses by approximately $20 million after all these restructuring changes are implemented. We believe the lack of NHP imports from Cambodia continues to affect the industry's entire supply of research models being imported into the U.S. According to the USDA's Global Agricultural Trade System, 2023 imports of NHPs to the U.S. year to date through June, are now 47.9% lower than those the same period of 2022. We have begun to identify additional suppliers and increased our imports of NHPs from countries outside of Cambodia. Pricing of NHPs and related costs continue to increase. We continue to generate positive margins and we've been meeting our customers' requirements. Our safety and assessment service offerings have not been impacted by the industry shortage.
The suppliers identified in countries other than Cambodia and China, and the NHP volume available from them, are not sufficient to make up for the volume of NHP exports in Cambodia in prior years. We sold fewer NHPs in Q3 than we did in Q2. Q2 was less than Q1. We expect to have fewer NHPs available for sale in Q4 than we actually sold in Q3. We will sell less NHPs in fiscal 2023 versus fiscal 2022, and if the situation in Cambodia and China stay the same, we expect we will have fewer NHPs available for sale in fiscal 2024 versus fiscal 2023. Due to increases in pricing, our sales dollars have remained fairly consistent this year, despite the reduced volumes.
If we're able to implement continued price increases, we could see similar sales dollars in 2024 compared to 2023 on lower volumes. Based on the current trends, taking into account the unknowns that exist for the NHP situation, we believe the future quarters for the company will be able our company will be able to achieve normalized averaged EBITDA run rate of about $20 million per quarter, and that should be achievable through all fiscal 2024. As we begin to utilize the recently added DSA capacity and selling new services, if there is an increase in supply of NHPs available for sale, these estimates may increase. We continue to expect improvements in our business as we optimize and integrate our DSA and RMS segments and see results from our focus on key initiatives.
We will continue to monitor the NHP situation and adjust our plans accordingly, with or without imports from Cambodia. We understand this is a significant industry issue in the U.S. and needs to be resolved in order to maximize the industry's ability in the U.S. to bring important life-saving therapies to the market. Looking to the future, as we continue to explore how we can better support our customers in their development of novel medicines going forward, we have embarked on a program to standardize the capture of our data generated in discovery, safety, and clinical studies. The goal is to structure our data in a way that should, in the future, enable an AI approach to integrate them to find correlations between discovery and safety data and clinical outcomes that can innovate and accelerate our translational medicine offering.
Longer term, we are confident in the product service portfolio we have assembled and continue to optimize, and our customer service value proposition that is particularly attractive to the biopharma sector, and in the skill and experience of the team we have globally executing on our vision. With this, I would like to turn the call over to Beth for the financial overview.
Thanks, Bob. For the nine months ended June 30, 2023, revenues totaled $431.7 million, a 9% increase from the $397.2 million recorded during the first nine months of 2022. RMS revenue for the nine months increased 8% to $296.8 million, from $276.1 million in the same period in 2022. In RMS, we continue to operate in an extremely dynamic pricing environment for larger research models, in particular, NHPs. DSA revenue for the nine months increased 11% as compared to the same fiscal period last year.
The increase in DSA revenue was primarily driven by additional year-to-date fiscal 2023 revenue generated from Integrated Laboratory Systems that was acquired in January 2022, plus new services related to genetic toxicology and organic growth in general toxicology services. These increases in DSA service revenues were partially offset by decreases in our discovery services, primarily related to the decline in overall biotech funding in the market. For the 2023 third quarter, total revenue decreased 9% to $157.5 million from the $172.7 million recorded during the prior year period. DSA revenues for the fiscal third quarter decreased by 5% to $46.8 million when compared to the prior year period.
As previously mentioned, the lower revenues experienced in our DSA segment were primarily driven by declines in overall biotech funding in the market, plus the timing of general toxicology services, somewhat offset by increased revenue from genetic toxicology services in connection with our new business at our Rockville facility. RMS revenue for the fiscal third quarter was down 10% to $110.7 million year-over-year, mainly due to a reduced volume of NHP sales, somewhat offset by favorable pricing over several products, particularly the NHPs. For the quarter, total gross profit improved to $55.2 million, or 35% of total revenues, from $50.9 million, or 29.5% of total revenues in last year's third quarter.
Gross profit for our DSA segment in the fiscal third quarter decreased to $17.3 million, or 37% of segment revenue, from $21.8 million, or 44.3% of segment revenue in last year's third quarter. Overall, we were pleased with the DSA gross profit as it showed improvements over the last 12 months. The decrease in gross profit versus last year's Q3 was primarily due to an unusually high gross profit in Q3 of 2022, due to the mix and timing of studies in our safety assessment services. DSA gross profit in 2023 was also impacted by the lower revenue in our discovery services. As our new services start to come online, we expect to generate further demand from both new and current customers alike.
Ultimately, based on this broader range of services and growth, we believe we will be able to boost our DSA margins from 30% to the mid-30% range in 2024, with long-term targets going into the upper 30% range. The net book-to-bill ratio for DSA in the third quarter was 1.08x, with a slightly positive book-to-bill for the trailing nine and 12 months. DSA backlog was $149.1 million at June 30, 2023, compared to $143.2 million at June 30, 2022. Additionally, our conversion rate, which is our ability to convert our backlog to sales, has continued to improve over the last three quarters.
RMS segment gross profit in the third quarter of fiscal 2023 was $37.9 million, or 34.2% of total revenues, compared to $29.1 million, or 23.6% of revenues in last year's period. The increase in margin in the current quarter was driven by several factors, including improved pricing for several product lines, partially offset by the absorption of duplicate costs as we implemented our site optimization plan. General and administrative expenses rose to $26.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2023, from $21.7 million in last year's second quarter. However, these expenses were down by $2.5 million from Q2 of 2023.
G&A expenses for the third quarter reflected $4.1 million in legal and third-party fees, primarily related to Cambodian NHP matters, the Cumberland, Virginia, ongoing investigation, defense on pending securities litigation, and recognition of a charge to fully accrue for a settlement of a purported class action and a related action in California. The settlement is subject to court approval. This compares to the previously reported legal and third-party fees in Q2 of 2023 of $6.7 million. Operating income for the quarter was $8.8 million, an increase from $4.8 million of operating income during last year's third quarter, reflecting both the $4.9 million in higher G&A expenses and a $4.6 million decrease in other operating expenses, driven primarily by decreased acquisition, integration, and restructuring expenses.
Interest expense increased to $10.8 million, up from $8.4 million in last year's third quarter, reflecting our higher debt balance for borrowing obtained for acquisitions and capital investments and higher interest rates. Consolidated net income attributable to common shareholders in the third quarter of fiscal 2023 totaled $1.8 million, or $0.07 per diluted share. This compared to consolidated net loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.7 million, or a $0.15 loss per diluted share in the third quarter of 2022. Adjusted EBITDA was $30.5 million, or 19.4% of total revenue, as compared to adjusted EBITDA of $37 million, or 21.4% of total revenue in last year's third quarter.
We are pleased with the $30.5 million of adjusted EBITDA this quarter, as it sequentially increased each quarter this year, up from adjusted EBITDA of $17.1 million, or 11.3% of total revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2023, and a -$5.5 million of adjusted EBITDA in Q1 of fiscal year 2023. Net cash provided by operations for the third quarter was $3.7 million, compared to cash used by operations of $9.4 million in the same period last year. The increase in cash provided by operations was primarily driven by improved net working capital compared to the same period last year.
CapEx in the third quarter was $4.5 million, or 2.9% of total revenue, and reflected investments in completing our DSA capacity expansions in Rockville, Maryland, and Fort Collins, Colorado, enhancements in laboratory technology, and improvements for animal welfare. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2023, capital expenditures totaled $21.3 million. Our balance sheet as of June 30, 2023, included $22.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, as compared to $24.6 million at March 31st, 2023. Total debt, net of debt issuance costs as of June 30, 2023, was $375.6 million, compared to $374.1 million at March 31, 2023.
The balance sheet also includes assets held for sale of $8.7 million and liabilities held for sale of $2.3 million. Due to the decreasing availability of NHPs in the U.S., we are recasting our full-year revenue guidance to at least $570 million in revenue, which is down from $580 million in previous guidance. We are also updating fiscal 2023 adjusted EBITDA guidance to be at least $60 million, down for the year from the previous guidance of $70 million. We expect to continue to remain in compliance with our financial covenants for the fiscal year. We still expect capital expenditures to be approximately 5% of revenue in fiscal 2023.
We anticipate a more modest level of capital investment in 2024 of less than 5%. The capital expenditures are down from our five-year average of 14% as we build capacity, new service offerings, and implemented our site optimization plan. We are pleased with our sequential financial performance this fiscal year and the progress that we are seeing from our investments, our site optimization implementation, and additional capacity investments in our DSA segment. We remain optimistic as we continue to grow and capture a significant portion of the opportunities in our market. With this financial overview, we will turn the call over to our operator for questions.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. Should you have a question, please press the star followed by the one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a three-tone prompt acknowledging your request. Questions will be taken in the order received, and should you wish to cancel your request, please press the star followed by the two. One moment, please, for your first question. Thank you, your first question comes from the line of Tim Daley from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
Great. Thanks, thanks for the question here. You know, Bob, very impressive book-to-bill here in, in DSA at 1.08 implies, you know, roughly $5 million sequential increase in the, in net orders in the quarter. You know, were, were there offsets or pull-forwards ? You know, just how are bookings going in the fourth quarter so far? Just trying to kind of, you know, help us figure out a, a bookings rate on a sequential basis moving forward.
Bob or Beth, are you there to answer Tim's question?
I'm sorry. I'm sorry, I think I was on mute. Sorry, Bob. All right, Tim, sorry. Thank you. I've been talking here, and nobody could hear me. I apologize. Tim, to answer your question, our bookings for the third quarter were actually very strong, one of our strongest ever. The net bookings, though, came just over one because of the cancellations. We're still seeing a high level of cancellations as we had in previous quarters, and I think that will continue. It's one of the reasons why we increased the sales force over the last year. As we've done that, we've seen our ability to increase in quotes. Our quoting level for the quarter was probably a record for us, as was our closing.
I think, you know, we hope to continue to see those trends. One of the areas where we've been off, in the last six to nine months, is in the discovery services, as we talked about, our revenues from discovery. One of the reasons we, we decreased guidance is because our discovery revenues are gonna be off this year, you know, from what we originally projected. However, you know, as I also said on the last call in March, we added a specific discovery sales team to the market back in the first half of this calendar year, in January, February, March. We're starting to see really a significant improvement there, and I'm starting to see a really good trend in the discovery.
Which maybe is an indication that some of the biotech funding is back, and then, and they're coming back and putting some of the projects back in, because that's been one of the strengths so far in the first part of this quarter. I don't have a, the ability to predict going forward, how, how this will, you know, what the bookings will be, but I do expect cancellations will continue as people are very cautious with their money. I think that the quoting activity remains fairly strong. I, I'm hopeful that we'll continue to close, at a good level. And, so far, so though, you know, pleased with what, what we're seeing so far this quarter.
All right, great. I guess just for Beth, you know, I think you guys called out, you know, assuming that Cambodia and China conditions remain, a $20 million quarterly run rate of EBITDA is a good number for 2024. Is that kind of a way to be thinking about at least a baseline for 2024 is $80 million of EBITDA for the full year? Thank you for the time. Appreciate it.
Yes, I would be thinking of it in terms of $80 million for the year, with an average of $20 million per quarter.
We average, if you look at the last, two quarters, we're probably 48, which is an average of 24. I would say that, you know, we look at in the 48% reduction of what's coming in the country, expect that there'll be a significant reduction. We're looking at that and pricing and saying, "Okay, let's make sure, as I said, let's set a conservative estimate, that we feel like we can depend on." If things change, if the biotech funding goes up, if we're able to recover some of these discovery sales, if we're able to see some other additional opportunities for NHPs, then, you know, that'd be great. At this point, let's recognize the environment that we're in.
All right. Perfect. Thank you for the time.
Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Hewitt from Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions, and congratulations on navigating what's a pretty challenging environment. Maybe first up, regarding the NHPs, you know, I, I heard what you said as far as Cambodia, still pretty locked down. It sounds like you're finding some supply in some other geographies or some other countries. As we think about opportunity there, I guess... Well, there's maybe two questions. First, were you able to unlock some of your existing inventory or sell some of the existing inventory? I guess number two, is there an opportunity for you to take in animals in one or more of your international sites, or is that not an option?
What was the last question again there? Take it.
Would it be possible, yeah, to take, to take, custody of animals in, in one of your European locations?
Okay. First of all, we do actually distribute NHPs in Europe, and we have. That market, we don't, we have not taken Cambodians into Europe, don't expect to, and that market's really not changed for us. Cambodians have never been part of our European plan. We don't anticipate changing that. We're not going to do anything with Cambodians for the moment anywhere. I think that was a part in it. The first part of the question was, yes, we have been able to bring in from other countries and others, and it kind of depends on what also our customers want. You asked about our inventory.
I don't wanna give up, really don't want to get into a lot of the inventory, but yes, we have, I've said in the past, sold from our inventory, but, no, we have not sold all of our inventory, and we've not released all of our inventory.
Got it. All right. Maybe a second question. As you look, as you've rolled out some of these new services, clearly you're having some success there, have you looked or, or is there any kind of a metric that you could provide that would, you know, if you look across your 3,000, over 3,000 customers worldwide, how many are using two services or three services? Maybe how has that, that metric changed over the past year? Thank you.
I don't have a good metric on, on that, Matt. I know that we have a, we're bringing our DSA groups together, discovery, and with our safety assessment group, and combining those. We are now looking forward. We're starting to discuss and figure out how to do a better job of bringing our research models customer base to our discovery base, which will evolve into our safety assessment base. To do that, we'll be making some changes and adding some scientific strength to our, to our bench in the coming year. Looking quite forward to evolving that part of the business, so we really could bring the RMS business a lot closer with the discovery business and have them cross-sell more than they have in the past.
To do that, I think we need to make some improvements to the scientific team. We're, we're planning to do that, and that, those will be announced in the future. Looking forward to that, and, and I think what we can do now that we've kind of, what I'd say, finished a lot of what were the brick-and-mortar changes that we needed to make.
Got it.
I think there's a lot of opportunity there, lot of opportunity there we've not touched yet.
Understood. That's helpful. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Dave Windley from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Bob, I'm wondering if you wouldn't mind breaking out your bookings from some of your newer services. I think you've called out in the past, biopharmaceutical and genetic toxicology. I'm wondering how much traction, how much, you know, those are contributing so far?
Yes. Let's see. If I can think of. I, I do have somewhat awareness of this. I don't have the right in front of me, but we started those services up, the end of calendar year, last year, and we've started to see that and that backlog grow and those services start to grow. It's still, we still, are not exceeding $1 million a month in the, in those services for those new facilities, but it's grown, fairly rapidly over the last six months. That backlog has, is grown, quite a bit, but it may be, you know, put in perspective, it may be $3 million or $4 million or $5 million, that backlog, $4 million of backlog now.
It's really hard to pull apart because many of those services are part of much larger programs, and some of those services were things that we were selling before, but we were outsourcing.
Okay.
You know, it's, it's sometimes really hard to say that, that's something we didn't have in the backlog before because what we were outsourcing before.
Okay. Okay, that's a good reminder there. In that regard, sticking on that side of the business, but thinking about your adjusted guidance, I think you're attributing most of the revenue decline in the full year guide to availability of NHPs. You also mentioned in an earlier answer, a little bit of discovery. It looks like overall revenue, you expect your revenue to be sequentially down by, you know, $30 million-ish. Should we think about that all coming out of RMS or is some of that DSA? I'm thinking again, because your net book-to-bill this quarter was, you know, pretty decent, as, as, I think Matt said.
Yeah.
How should we think about this?
We're gonna see most of that come out of the RMS. I know it's not down $30 million, I think it's down, we brought it down $10 million.
Right.
Um-
$10 million reduction in guidance, I meant sequential from the third quarter. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough.
Yeah. I think, you know, I think it's been $10 million from what we got, and I think, I think that will come more, that will come from the RMS side, not the, not the DSA side. And that will be primarily NHP related. For the year, you know, our NHP revenue is probably a little higher than I thought we would be. It's our DSA, it's our DSA sales that are a little lower than I thought we'd be for the year.
Okay. Interesting. Okay. Then on the, on the RMS side, can, can you, Beth, give us a sense of how much of the revenue, either for the quarter or year to date, is still tied to NHPs? How much, how much are NHPs driving RMS now?
Well, it's, it's always been an important part of our, our revenue. I would, Dave, put it, kind of put a little bit of perspective for it. The volume of NHPs that we sold in the third quarter this year, were probably in excess of number of NHPs, were probably at least 40% less than we sold last year. When I say that what the imports coming to the U.S. are down 40%, 40%, I think what I said, 49%, 40%, 49%. We're, you know, we're seeing that, and we, as a result, we have much less going out the door now on a quarterly basis.
Right.
We don't break out.
So-
I don't think we break out NHP revenues from RMS revenues.
Okay. Okay. Thinking about your commentary, which appreciate the helpful comments to begin to frame 2024, thinking about a, you know, $110 million number in the third quarter, and it sounds like, you know, your, your base case expectation is that the volume of NHPs that will be available to you will continue to shrink. I guess I'm wondering how much of that revenue run rate is, you know, subject to the decline in accessibility to NHPs and how much is kind of more stable because it's tied to rodents?
I, here's the interesting thing. I think when I just told you the volumes, the number, the volume of NHPs that went up the third quarter was down from last year. That 110 included that 40% reduction in volume.
Right.
From last year. Okay? I think overall, we, we could be down 40%, 45% next year. I don't know that we... I, I think, I don't know we're gonna, we could, I don't know if we could see a greater falloff next year in the sales of NHPs than we saw in the RMS business than we saw in the third quarter. Because that, now that is baked in. That reduction is significantly baked in. I do think that based on when things are coming in, we could have some variations between quarters of when they go out. It may not be every quarter's even, it may be some quarters are better than others.
I think overall, on average, the quarter that we saw may be the quarter that, you know, that with that significantly less volume that, that we could see.
Okay. Last question for me.
I hope that helps out.
Yeah. Yeah. You're kind of saying no more decline from the third quarter?
Well, unless-
Level, third quarter volume.
On average, Dave, we could have quarters-
Yeah.
that we. In total, I think that we see it fairly consistent. It doesn't mean it's, every quarter is going to be the same. That, and that's.
Right.
That's, you know, it could, but on average for the year, I think that's, you know, counting on that 40% decline is something that, you know, 40%-45% decline is, is something that we, you know, we are gonna have to maybe get used to.
Right. Okay. Last question for me. Earlier in the year, both at, at the Inotiv level and the industry level, there's a lot of conversation about working with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to, you know, to, to, to both get approved, kind of have a pathway and get approved a parentage test to, to try to satisfy and kind of reopen the supply chain, satisfy the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service about the provenance of animals coming from Cambodia and, and reopen that supply chain. Your competitor yesterday, it really didn't come up. I'm wondering if you could give us an update on where that stands, what progress has been made, if any, and, and what, you know, upcoming court cases, CITES, meetings might mean for that, you know, dialogue?
Well, Dave, I've come to the conclusion that, you know, we're not, we're not big enough and important enough to really make a big difference in what's gonna take place with U.S. Fish and Wildlife, with the DOJ, the government and those actions. We follow it closely, they're going to do what they want to do, what they choose to do, what they think is best. I really don't have the ability to predict what they're going to do, which I think is why we're trying to just be realistic. Given the landscape we have today, we're trying to figure out how to play within the landscape we have today. If that changes, you know what? Great! We're ready for it.
If it doesn't change, let's make sure that, you know, let's make sure our business model works based on status quo today. I think it's a very tough thing for our industry. It's very tough for drug discovery and development in the U.S. to see that happen. As far as our company, let's, let's take that as the basis and move forward from there. Instead of every day wake up frustrated that, you know, that it's not, that that's not changed. Let's wake up realizing that is today's normal, and when it's ready to change, we'll be ready for it. Let's just set that expectation. It's, it's really important for our management team and I think for our leadership team. I want them to wake up every day knowing they're successful.
Having them come to work every day thinking they're not successful because of something we're waiting for the government to do or not do, is not fair to them and not fair to us. Let's adjust our plans so they can wake up feeling successful every day and not feel like we're dependent on something we can't control.
Right. Understood. I appreciate the perspective. Thank you.
Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Frank Takkinen from Lake Street Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Great, thanks for taking the questions. Wanted to clarify on the renewed EBITDA guidance. I understand the revenue guidance change, but was hoping to get a little bit more color on the EBITDA guidance change. I figured it would be maybe a little bit less than the same proportion of revenue coming down, but maybe talk to margin expectations, and then is there an expected uptick in operating expenses as well to get to that $60 million?
Well, the, you know, as I outlined for, for the year, you know, compared to where we were, I'm, I'm pretty pleased with what, you know, even with the reduction in volume, the pricing for the NHPs has held up pretty well. The RMS sales held up pretty well. There were really two major things for the, for the year that we're off. You know, discovery sales may be down about $10 million from where we'd like them, and planned for them to be. That's, you know, that's a reduction in top line. You know, then we probably had legal fees in excess of $9 million or $10 million where they thought to be. On the discovery sales, you know, probably 80% of that goes to the bottom line. That, those two things make up a pretty big...
Between that and the legals, you'd make up the biggest difference where we're off for this year versus where we hoped to be. You know, given all the challenges we had this year and all the changes that have taken place in the industry and the biotech funding and the NHPs, we're, we're pretty pleased with this quarter, very pleased with where we are today and the, and the ability to get all of these things that we had, you know, a year ago in December. People would talk to me and say, "How in the world are you going to finish, you know, four or five expansions and eight or nine site closures, and you've changed this and that?" You know, the good news is, our organization's done that, and now, you know, those things are done, so we have a lot less variables.
As far as this quarter, you know, what we thought is, again, just what I told Dave Windley, let's look at where we are realistically with NHPs and where we are at the market, and let's make sure that we, we identify something realistic. Yeah, we could, yeah, we could leave guidance really high and try to stretch and do something that's not natural for the company and, and achieve a short-term quarter to meet it, to meet the guidance, but that probably is not the best long-term decision for our company. What I try to give guidance to is what I think is the best long-term decision for our company. What Beth referred to in her point was what is really a reoccurring expectation. Our last two months quarters are pretty good. They're $24 million. Do we think we can maintain that? Yeah.
Our goal is obviously to, to maintain at least that, but let's set an expectation that we can, we can, that we feel comfortable with, with those lower volumes of NHPs that we may see in the future, and, you know, the timing when they may come in and, and be available for sale. Some cases we're expanding the quarantine periods, you know, that may take... If we do that, it could take an extra four weeks of quarantine, for whatever, you know, we're being very careful, that may choose- change when things go out, and when we ship things, you know, you obviously now, you, you know, if the NHP is going at $30,000-$40,000 a piece, you, you change, 300, when 300 NHPs go out, you just change the top line by, and bottom line significantly.
It's, you know, it's $10 million there, you know, 50% of that could go to the bottom line, or at least 30%. You know, there's, you know, we've, we've, got to be very careful of how we set those expectations. Plus, we have a, you know, as far as the NHP business, if you think about it, we have a very high fixed cost structure and a very high standard for animal welfare. Even though we have less NHPs going, we still have to cover that fixed cost structure. You know, so that those, those, you know, on that lower volume, that remains, you know, we can't take a shortcut on, on animal welfare in our investments. We're watching those things very closely.
Got it. That's helpful. Now that you have a lot of the site closure, broadly speaking, site optimization behind you, you've got a, a, a solid infrastructure to grow off of now. Maybe speak to your confidence behind your longer term, 18%-22% EBITDA margins, and if you're at all thinking about a, a timeline to when we could reach a, a profitability profile like that?
Well, I think as, as biotech funding, or as we increase our market share, we have a great leverage, I think, in our DSA model. And I think it out- I think there's outlined this before, how we get to this 22% on the, on the, with the, with the increased margins from the DSA business as we grow that. As the costs continue to come out of our RMS side, and those things will continue over the next six to nine months. What I'm doing by, outlining this current guidance is probably taking a lot of pressure off growing the DSA sales business, in the midst of a reduced biotech funding.
Again, I hope we can, we grew it, and, you know, about 10% last year, went from 60 - 180, so maybe it's 29 - 160. So maybe low single-double digits. Maybe we could do that again next year. When we, you know, when we were doing this two years ago, when biotech funding was high, we were growing that business at 25%, 30% a year. This environment's a little different. What I'm trying to say is, look, okay, it's okay. It doesn't matter if it takes us 12 months to get there, or 18 months to get there. It doesn't need to take it six months. Let's, let's put a realistic expectation. Yeah, I hope we can get there sooner.
Our team would hope we get there sooner, and we're looking at how to get to contract it sooner. Every once in a while, we see some pretty good momentum. you know, if we don't get there next year to the, to the 22%, we did 19% here, obviously it's possible, and we don't have all the cost and savings in, and we don't have all the margins in. It's obviously possible for us to get to 22%, I think what we need to do is make sure we get there in a way that we're building the company for with a very strong foundation for the future. We don't need to be in a hurry.
Right. Makes sense. Got it. Thanks for taking the questions. I'll stop there.
Thanks.
Thank you. Your last question comes from the line of Yuan Zhi , from B. Riley. Please go ahead.
Thank you for taking our questions. Bob, high level, can you provide some comments on the demand of NHPs? How does that compare to last year based on your observation? You mentioned the supply part from government tracking data, then I have a couple of follow-up questions.
Yeah, our, our demand is, is staying fairly, fairly high, and I think it's going to continue to be there. 'Cause I think it, it's gonna, you know, it took... The, the, when the sup- the supply chain takes a while to empty out. People have inventory. People have things in quarantine. People have things getting acclimated. So it takes a while for the supply that existed in November to start to be reduced. Now that we're only importing, you know, half of what we had before, those, the s- the supply bottlenecks are gonna get are gonna get a little tougher, I believe. There are also some changes going on to what, what type of NHP somebody may want. Now, it may not be a, a Cambodian, maybe they're choosing to go to different species.
You know, I think there's a shift in, in what people are looking for. We continue to look at that closely, but, I think that the demand is still there. If we, if we had more, I think the, the demand would be there for more, but that's, I don't think that's gonna be the, gonna be the case.
Got it. In addition, can you please clarify the accounting method related to the NHP biologic assets? Did you use first-in, first-out or last-in, first-out to calculate the inventory and the COGS?
We use actual. Actual cost.
I see.
We, each, each animal will have its cost of what it costs to bring it, to buy it and import it. As we sell that, the, the actual cost is, is, again, against that. We do, as we, as I may, I may not have alluded to earlier, we do have overhead and has to be covered by those margins, such as feeding, labor, utilities, sewage, insurance, transportation. A lot of our, those costs are expense. They're not in the, they're not in our inventory. We expense those as we go.
Got it. One last question. On the supply of NHPs outside of Cambodia, have you noticed an increase of cost of those supplies? Do you have some kind of contract or price lock-in in place for those supplies?
We do have some price, contracts, which lock in prices. Yes, we have seen prices increase.
Got it.
I expect.
That's all for me.
Continue to... Thank you.
Thank you. Mr. Leasure, there are no further question at this time. Please proceed.
All right. Thank you everyone for joining today's call. It's a lot of great questions, a lot of information. Our team looks forward to what the future holds for Inotiv. We've positioned the company for strong growth. I would like to thank our investors for being part of this journey with us. We understand our industry has faced some challenges and some changes. We've made adjustments to address these challenges. We also believe that we have substantial opportunities going forward, as all of our efforts to date have significantly enhanced our capabilities in the marketplace. Moreover, our capital investment program has largely been accomplished already, and we expect lower CapEx to stand as a % of revenue going forward. In completing the necessary infrastructure upgrades for the business, we now have the advantage of both scale and in-house capabilities.
We believe that we can continue to effectively increase our sales volume through greater cross-selling to our existing customers while developing relationships with new customers alike. We are now well positioned to better control the timing of start and delivery of projects, as well as to provide high levels of customer service at all times. We look forward to the next call and seeing many of you at upcoming healthcare investment conferences. Thank you, and I may add one more. Happy birthday, Robert. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. Thank you all for participating.