Earnings Call: Q2 2020

May 8, 2020

Good morning, and welcome to the Spire Second Quarter Earnings Call. All participants will be in listen only mode. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Scott Dudley, Managing Director, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning and welcome to our Q2 earnings call. We issued our earnings news release this morning and you may access it on our website at spireenergy.comundernewsroom. There's a slide presentation that accompanies our webcast and you may download it either from the webcast site or from our website under Investors and then Events and Presentations. Presenting on the call today are Suzanne Sitherwood, President and CEO Steve Lindsey, Executive Vice and Chief Operating Officer and Steve Rasche, Executive Vice President and CFO. Before we begin, let me cover our Safe Harbor statement and use of non GAAP earnings measures. Today's call, including responses to questions, may contain forward forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although our forward looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are various uncertainties and risk factors that may cause future performance or results to be different than those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties are outlined in our quarterly and annual filings with the SEC. In our comments, we will be discussing net economic earnings, contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted long term capitalization, which are all non GAAP measures used by management when evaluating our performance and results of operations. Explanations and reconciliations of these measures to their GAAP counterparts are contained in our news release and the slide presentation. So with that, I will turn the call over to Suzanne. Thank you, Scott, and good morning to everyone joining us for our 2nd quarter update. I'd like to begin by acknowledging that we're all adjusting to a new normal. As we focus on staying safe and healthy during the coronavirus, we're living in a world of video calls, FaceTime, webcast, working from home, wearing face masks and washing our hands a lot. And we're connecting in new ways. Like you, many of us aren't in our offices and aren't able to see one another face to face. In fact, today is the 2nd time in nearly 2 months that Steve Rasche, Steve Lindsey and I have been in the same location. Rest assured that we're distancing and disinfecting and getting the job done. It's not easy to stay connected in times like this as fire connecting with us should feel like a handshake at the front door. But without the ability to actually shake someone's hand, we found ourselves leaning into other expressions of caring and friendship like how we listen, how we check on our elderly neighbors, how we smile and wave hello to strangers. It's how our crews stop work, take off their hats and put their hands over the heart when a funeral procession drives by. These moments of connection and caring inspire the good in all of us and provide the energy it takes to walk through a time like this. A time when some communities are impacted more than others, but none go untouched. A time when we understand how essential our service is and how people count on us to deliver. A time when safety has an expanded meaning and personal protective equipment becomes an everyday necessity. But at fire, it's easier for us to pivot. We have a very clear mission that guides us, answer every challenge, advance every community and enrich every life through the strength of our energy. You see, we believe we are called to answer this and every challenge that arises. We know that people rely on our energy every day and that we are an essential service. We know that we cannot let our customers and communities down and we know that safety is a core value, a value at the heart of every decision. It's because of this deeply held belief that we set in motion a broad range of protective steps to address the coronavirus health crisis and its economic impact on our customers, while passionately protecting the health and safety of our employees and communities. We began in early March by activating our incident support team or the IST, a cross functional team of 25 leaders from operations and all our shared services. The ISP has been meeting nearly every morning to discuss challenges, solve issues and coordinate actions from HR policies to supply chain access to PPE and impact to employees, customers and operations. By the middle of March, we activated the highest level of our crisis response plan by convening our crisis management team or CMT. I asked Steve Lindsey to lead this team as Spire Inc. Chief Operating Officer. Steve immediately gathered all of our Chief Officers and Business Unit Presidents to quickly make executive decisions around broad ranging challenges. Steve will talk more about this in a moment. From my perspective, I'd like to say that it's been inspiring to watch the IST and CMT work. Together, we bring a collection of expertise to our conversations from the very professional perspective of Bayer's leadership to our external involvement with the American Gas Association and our firsthand conversations with medical experts via the many hospital boards we serve on. Together, we are careful to balance the needs of our many stakeholders, including you. We are communicating early and often with all employees and customers. We are connecting regularly with our board and keeping our governors, legislators and regulators informed every step of the way. Most importantly, the CMT is keenly aware of the impact our decisions have on people. In everything we do, our goal is to flatten the curve and help control the spread of coronavirus while safely and reliably providing energy our customers and communities. Thank goodness our largest operations are in Missouri and Alabama, areas of the country that have been minimally impacted by the pandemic. In fact, only 11 of our 3,500 employees have tested positive for the coronavirus and all but one person is back to work. So, as we work to meet the challenges created by the coronavirus, we remain focused on our strategy to deliver growth and value by growing organically, investing in infrastructure and advancing through innovation. We continue to take steps to ensure that we remain strong both financially and from an operations perspective. We'll hear more on that from Steve and Steve when they discuss our capital spending, including investments in new business and infrastructure upgrades, as well as our updated CapEx forecast that supports our long term growth outlook. As reported in our earnings announcement this morning, our 2nd quarter net economic earnings per share was below last year and our FY 2020 plan. As Steve Rasche will discuss in more detail, the results were driven by lower margins due to warmer weather across our footprint, margins that were not fully mitigated by regulatory mechanisms. However, our results were minimally impacted by the coronavirus. And finally, we'll spend some time updating you on our process as we continue to pursue favorable regulatory outcomes across our jurisdictions with a focus on the ISRA case and filings in Missouri. With that, I'll turn the call over to Steve Lindsey to discuss our results and coronavirus responses in more detail. Thank you, Suzanne. I want to begin by acknowledging the outstanding efforts of our employees during the difficult times brought on by the coronavirus and the resulting economic shutdown. You're providing great service for our customers while taking extra care to ensure their health, safety and well-being as well as your own and helping support our communities in this time of need and we all thank you very much. Suzanne mentioned we quickly activated the CMT with 10 primary areas of focus. This morning I'd like to take a moment to outline the steps we've taken to address the coronavirus and limit its impact on 3 of those areas, our employees, customers and communities. Keeping these stakeholders healthy, safe and supported is more than a priority for us, it's a core value, it's who we are at Spire. For our employees, we have educated everyone on healthy practices and encouraged people to follow of the experts including the CDC and other public health organizations. Our guidelines include staying home when not feeling well, frequent hand washing, social distancing and other best practices. We implemented policies to help employees handle the impacts of the coronavirus including taking care of family members or dealing with children being home from school. Example of this is the implementation of our emergency leave program. For our field workers and technicians we have taken safety precautions to protect them and our customers. We prescreen a customer's premise to ensure that no one is sick or symptomatic before we allow our workers to enter a home or business and we equip our employees with personal protective equipment. For our office based employees, we implemented a work from home policy starting in March and extending through May. Along with work from home and social distancing, we've also implemented related policies to eliminate all non essential travel as well as group meetings and gatherings. And across our company, we stepped up the frequency of cleaning and sanitizing our work locations. Currently, we're developing work transition plans that include reopening offices and facilities. For our customers, we are 1st and foremost focused on making sure they are well served and that they continue to and that we continue to provide safe and reliable energy that they've come to rely on regardless of the situation at hand. Help reduce customer contact and limit the potential for spreading the illness, postpone work that wasn't time critical or urgent and to help our customers through what is surely a difficult time financially, we work with our regulators to suspend involuntary disconnections and late fees through the end of May, while also expanding customer bill assistance programs. As a company, we have pledged $500,000 matching gift to augment the contributions made by customers and employees into our Dollar Help program. Thousands of customers have already signed up to give and their match gifts total more than $300,000 so far. Similarly, we have donated $250,000 to local area food pantries and meal programs. From Alabama to Wyoming, we're helping provide about 650 meals for families struggling to make ends meet during this time. We also led an effort with other companies to donate and set up laptops for children in limited income schools so they're able to learn from home. Since we're all in this together, we've been coordinating and staying communications with various state and local government bodies, healthcare organizations and industry groups to ensure that we're doing most good by leveraging our collective energy and resources. While we've been hard at work to address the impacts of the coronavirus and serve our customers well, we've also remained focused on our business objectives centered on growing our company. We continue to invest in organic growth and infrastructure upgrades across our utilities. For the first half of fiscal twenty twenty, we invested $53,000,000 in new business keeping pace with last year's record levels of investment and new premise activations. As you can see, our investment in our utilities is expanding. Year to date, we've invested $279,000,000 focused on new business and pipeline replacement. That's up $24,000,000 or nearly 10% over the first half of last year. On the gas related business side, our spend is actually down year over year largely reflecting the completion of the Spire STL Pipeline. For the full year of fiscal 2020, we've increased our planned capital spend to $640,000,000 up $30,000,000 from our prior forecasted investment. About 88% of our 2020 spend will be on our gas utilities with 2 thirds of the increase or about $20,000,000 attributable to utility investment. We also plan to invest $10,000,000 in the 3rd quarter at Spire Storage. Regulatory mechanisms we have including incentives to accelerate system upgrades in Missouri and Alabama and real time rate making in Alabama are key to timely recovery and support infrastructure modernization, earnings growth and better environmental performance to reduce methane emissions. As you know from our discussion last quarter, in Missouri we have been working through a number of ISRS cases decided by the Missouri Public Service Commission going back to 2016 that have been challenged and appealed by the Office of Public Counsel and resulted in adverse appellate court rulings late last year. At the time of the appeals court orders, we said we will pursue all avenues, legislative, judicial and regulatory to preserve the ability to continue investing in the safety, reliability and environmental performance of our pipeline system, while achieving timely recovery. The start of the Missouri legislative session in January, we worked to introduce bills in both the House and Senate to clarify the ISRA statute as it relates to eligibility of infrastructure upgrade spend for accelerated recovery. The Senate Bill passed early March. On May 6, the House passed the substitution of the Senate Bill. Given the differences between the versions passed in each chamber, the legislation will now go to conference committee to reconcile the 2 versions. Meanwhile, we have continued to file new ISRS requests including 1 in early February. Late last month, we, the staff of the Missouri Public Service Commission and the Office of Public Counsel reached the unanimous stipulation and agreement subject to Missouri PSC approval that would result in an $11,000,000 annualized increase in ISRS revenue. Regarding the cases subject to the appeals court ruling, these have been remanded back to Missouri Public Service Commission for final resolution following the denial of our request from Missouri Supreme Court review in mid March. The commission has 120 days or until the middle of July to render a decision including whether any refund is required. For anyone who would like more detail on the various ISRS cases, there's a table in the appendix of our slide presentation today. Finally, in Alabama, we have been implementing new off system sales and capacity release program that went into effect December 1. We're also continuing to pursue the benefits of the Accelerated Infrastructure Modernization Rider or AIM and are on track to achieve the threshold number of miles replaced this year in order to qualify for the ROE adder in 2021 like we received this past year. With that, I'll turn the call over to Steve Rasche for a financial review and update. Good morning and let me add my wishes for good health and safety to everyone and a huge shout out to all of our first responders, healthcare workers and our own team who continue to serve bravely every day. Let me cover our quarterly results, the financial impact of coronavirus and an update to our targets for the second half of our fiscal twenty twenty. Turning to our results for the quarter, delivered consolidated net economic earnings of $144,000,000 down $3,900,000 from last year. Our gas utility posted earnings of just over $144,000,000 down $2,400,000 from last year as a result of warmer weather and losses on investments. Gas marketing delivered earnings of just over $5,000,000 down just over $1,000,000 from last year as higher volumes from our expansion were offset by less favorable market conditions and higher cost. And we saw higher earnings from the Spire STL Pipeline which entered service last quarter, a lower loss from Spire Storage reflecting the benefits of our operational improvements and slightly higher corporate costs. Looking at our per share results, current year earnings of $2.75 per share were down $0.15 from last year reflecting lower earnings as well as the impact of preferred and common stock issued over the last 12 months. I'd offer 2 additional comments. 1st, as Suzanne mentioned, we saw limited financial impact from the coronavirus this quarter since it really didn't hit our service territories until mid March, more on the forward impact in a few minutes. And secondly as reflected here, net economic earnings continues to include all ISRS revenues or saying it another way excluding the provision we book for GAAP purposes. For this quarter, ISRS revenues subject to a provision were $2,200,000 including interest bringing provision at March 31 to $16,900,000 Overall weather this quarter was warmer than normal by 11% in Missouri and by 26% in Alabama. Compared to last year's colder weather, we saw margins in Missouri decline by $3,000,000 as slightly lower residential volumetric margins were offset by higher net net interest revenues combined with a significant drop in commercial margins. Our Southern Utilities showed margin growth as lower demand was offset by annual rate increases. Margins were also significantly below our expectations of normal weather and mitigation mechanisms that offset that exposure. Again in our southern service territories, the mechanisms largely worked as planned. In Missouri however, we saw a $7,000,000 negative impact to margins against normal weather consisting of 2 components. 1st, WNAR. This new weather normalization tool was introduced in our last proceeding and should ensure that we get the right recovery of the residential volumetric charge, not over collecting in cold periods, not under collecting in warmer ones. While the mechanism did address a portion of our weather deficiencies this quarter, we estimate that it was ineffective by 6% or roughly $5,000,000 Secondly, we saw a shortfall in commercial and industrial margins that do not have weather mitigation in Missouri even for smaller more weather sensitive customers. Total impact here was about $2,000,000 We clearly have some work to do both working with our regulators to improve the effectiveness of our weather mitigation and our next Missouri rate proceeding and 2, generating earnings from other sources in the back half of twenty twenty to offset some of this headwind. There were 2 other key variances this quarter, O and M expenses and other expenses as outlined here on Slide 13. Total O and M expenses as reported were down $12,600,000 and although we have a history of cost control, this reduction reflects the benefit of a regulatory deferral of a pension remeasurement charge with the offsetting expense recorded in other expenses as shown here. Excluding this adjustment, our run rate utility O and M was up $2,900,000 or 2.6 percent due to higher operations and employee costs. The remaining O and M expenses represent higher marketing costs due to our business growth and a cost of Spire STL Pipeline which is now in operations. The other key variance is in other expenses with a run rate after the adjustment for the pension re measurement of $6,500,000 reflecting 2 items. First, prior year Spire STL Pipeline AFUDC which no longer exists and is now in our operating numbers. And secondly, a $3,600,000 swing in returns on investments held to support our non qualified benefit plans. Not surprisingly this year we saw unrealized losses this quarter compared to a much stronger earnings stream in the Q1 of 2019. I would note that the explanation of all cost variances, contribution margins as well as our review of our year to date results are included in the appendix to this presentation for your reference. Since the health crisis began, we've been focused on our liquidity position. Harkening back to our playbook from the Great Recession, we moved aggressively with the assistance of our bank group to draw on our credit facility in mid March as the commercial paper market became uneconomic. In late March, we secured $150,000,000 term loan to provide additional liquidity and we stand in a strong financial position with total available liquidity at March 31 of $661,000,000 and a solid long term capitalization as well. In fact, we issued equity early in the quarter with proceeds of just under $10,000,000 As we turn to the coronavirus impacts on our operating results, a bit of perspective, roughly 70% of our earnings and margins are residential and the current health crisis hit near the end of the winter heating season where we earn a majority of our return. As a result, we've been relatively insulated so far from the economic downturn. We are watching closely our commercial and industrial customers especially the smaller firms who are bearing the brunt of the current shutdown and we are tracking the incremental cost of the actions that Steve and Suzanne touched on a few minutes ago. Now, none of us have a crystal ball to predict how this situation will play out. Based on what we know today including data and regional economic projections, we've constructed a forecast of key impacts based upon the following assumptions. From an economic standpoint, continuation of the downturn through this quarter and then a slow ramp up in activity that will stretch at least through the rest of calendar 2020. From an operational standpoint, normal weather, a return of normal collection activities, disconnection and late payment fees, as well as minimal disruption for our construction crews. Based on these assumptions we have estimated the following financial impacts. As a result of our moratorium on fees anticipate losing fee revenue of roughly $1,900,000 We have seen some decline in our commercial and industrial margins reflecting both the temporary shutdowns of large manufacturers the anticipated lower demand from our smart commercial accounts. We estimate that impact to be approximately $2,200,000 We have not yet seen any appreciable change in our residential margins and we will continue to monitor that closely. However, we are anticipating a significant increase in bad debts in the coming quarters. To estimate our exposure we went back to our records for the last recession in 2,008 and 2,009 when we saw bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue increased about 20 basis points over normal levels. Applying that experience to our current book of business results in an estimated exposure of $3,500,000 And of course we're tracking other direct costs including the cost of PP and E, enhanced facility cleaning, employee costs for lost time among others. We are pursuing opportunities to offset these headwinds including identifying those costs that would naturally be lower as a result of stay at home orders such as travel and we're finding additional operating efficiencies. We're also working with our regulators as Steve mentioned both as we have been to deal with the immediate impacts to our customers in our business during the quarter and now discussing potential regulatory treatment of the increased cost including bad debts and the cost of responding to the health crisis and helping our customers recover. Stepping back, our estimates are based upon a current view of the economic recovery and as you can see we have provided sensitivities on each of these key exposures to gauge the impact under a different set of assumptions. Looking forward, we remain on solid ground and are focused on growth. As Steve mentioned, we've upgraded our capital investment target for the year to $640,000,000 In addition, we've updated our 5 year capital investment target now through 2024 to $2,800,000,000 That level of investment is driven by utility infrastructure upgrades and should drive rate base growth of between 7% 8% for the forecast period. In addition, we reaffirm our long term net economics per share growth target of 4% to 7%. And given the current uncertainty surrounding the resolution of our Missouri risk recovery, we'll continue to refrain from EPS guidance for fiscal year 2020 at this time. And finally, our financing plans remain on track with only modest equity needs for the remainder of 2020. So in summary, we're in solid shape and remain focused on delivering for all of our stakeholders. With that, let me turn back over to you Suzanne. Thank you, Steve and Steve. As we close today's presentation, I think it's important to take a moment to acknowledge the strength of our collective energy. Meyers Utilities have been operating for more than 160 years. Thanks to great leadership, great partnership and a legacy of hardworking, caring employees, we have survived wars, the Great Depression, weather disasters and the 1918 influenza pandemic. The law of successful history and with the support of our investors, our communities and our public policy leaders, we will work our way through the impact of the coronavirus. We'll do it together and we'll do it in a way that brings sustained long term value for our shareholders, customers and the communities we serve. Before we open for questions, I'd like to thank Spire's employees, many of whom are listening to this webcast. I know how hard you work and I know how much you care about one another, our customers and the communities that we live and work in. You make me proud every day and I am forever grateful for the way you rally to answer challenges. You are leaders, you are conveners, you are helpers, you are heroes. You understand that fundamentally energy exists to help people and you give your all to deliver energy safely, reliably and with all your heart. To the investors and analysts on the call today, we'd like to thank you for your investment and the trust you place in us. On behalf of our Board of Directors, our executive team and our employees, we take that trust very seriously, especially during these uncertain times. We look forward to seeing you again soon either as part of the upcoming virtual AGA forums or other virtual conferences and roadshows in the months ahead. Of course, we look forward to the time when we can once again meet face to face. Until then, we wish you well and trust that you will stay safe and healthy. Now, we'll take your questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. The first question comes from Richie Ciccarelli with BofA Securities. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. Hope everyone's healthy and safe today. Appreciate you taking my questions. Just had a couple here on ISRIS. Can you just go over the difference between the two versions of the House and Senate Bill and where you ultimately expect that to land once it gets reconciled? And then on the recent settlement with the ISRS filing, where I guess what changed this time around with OPC where you were able to garner a settlement there? Hey, Richie. This is Steve Lindsey and I appreciate you calling in this morning. On your first question relative to the legislation, in terms of the content of our portion, there's really not that much difference between the House and Senate bills. What you have are some things that get attached as they go through the process. And so really, we're fairly consistent with those bills. And again, if you go back to what they're trying to accomplish, it's to really reinforce what the intent of the statute was when it was put in place over 15 years ago, which is bare steel and cast iron and to really just kind of codify some of that in terms of the language. So I don't think there's a lot of difference between those 2 and that's why when it goes back to the committee for reconciliation, there'll be some cleanup relative to the things that are attached there. Relative to your second part of the question in terms of the stipulation, I think we've just been working collectively. And again, we felt this way all along that the pipe that we've been replacing meets all the requirements relative to what needs to be part of the infrastructure upgrades included in the ISRS program. Even to the fact that we still agree that the plastics that we've been replacing are much more efficient way to upgrade our system. But this primarily focused on the bare steel and cast iron and did they meet those criteria. We're providing additional evidence. But I think in terms of the reason that we've got to this is because we continue to work together to strongly support again the intent of why we've been replacing this pipe around safety, reliability and efficiency of operating our system. So I think it's progress if you want to look at it that way. And again, even with the cases that are still there, we'll continue to present evidence and hopefully make our case around the pipe that had been replaced in previous years is the same criteria that we're using going forward. Got it. Thank you. That's very helpful. And then just around your CapEx profile, I think you might have been one of the few companies to raise your spending this year for 2020. Just curious, what's given you the increased confidence to execute on the plan this year, given the headwinds with COVID related pressures? Hey, Richie. This is Steve. Great question. Couple of things. First of all, I guess the downside of the warmer weather that has impacted our margins is it does give us a little bit better working conditions on our capital spend. And as Steve talked about, we had a strong winter season and now we're heading into the heart of our capital spend. So I think that's point number 1. And then number 2, playbook for utilities as we look at how we can best try to offset both the headwinds from weather and also the headwinds from coronavirus that we talked about, ramping up our capital spend is one of those activities. It's clearly something that helps get us back to work and we're doing it with the cooperation and understanding of all the leaders throughout our states and our jurisdictions. And I think it's just helping us to ensure that not only are we doing the right thing by upgrading our infrastructure, but we're also doing it in a way that's going to make us even more resilient as we go forward. So I think that it's really just an evolution of all those things. And again, you've seen us ramp up and ramp down in the past and we think this is an opportunity for us to ramp up a little bit. And Richie, this is the other Steve. Let me follow-up from an operational perspective. I would like to reinforce that as we and again, while this quarter was only really several weeks in terms of the measurement period, we never stopped working. And you'll hear some businesses talk about return to work. We talk about it more as a transition and you think about it from a construction and capital perspective, we really didn't take our foot off the gas. We obviously changed some of our processes and procedures relative to personal protective equipment. And to be quite honest, we've limited going into customers' homes to do service tieovers and changeovers. We'll go back and do that. But again in terms of the infrastructure that we've been working on and we'll continue to that really didn't slow down and that's a great tribute to our frontline employees, the management that's out there that really pull together. If you think about our 3 strategic areas of focus, one of those is innovation and we got innovative in the way we're continuing to think about our work. The other part I would just want to reinforce is that our capital for these type programs is fairly evenly distributed across our 3 major operating areas in terms of the east side of Missouri, West and Alabama. And so we're not just impacted in one area in terms of ratcheting and upper back. We're fairly evenly spread even with the new business as well. So if you think about that increase that we saw year to date of nearly 10% that I referenced, that's pretty evenly spread across all of our operating companies, which I think gives us a good balance as well. The next question comes from Michael Weinstein with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Hi, Mike. Hi. Hey, I was wondering if you guys have a better sense at all how whether legislation would preclude the need for a ruling at the Supreme Court or not at this point after conferring with your own lawyers and maybe outside counsel? Michael, this is Steve. The Supreme Court opportunity at least for the rulings that came out of the appellate court has already passed. They opted not to take the appeal that we and the Public Service Commission put forth. So really the legislation that Steve Lindsay talked about is the best opportunity for longer term fixed. We obviously are continuing to work with the Missouri Public Service Commission, the staff, the OPC and the other interveners to not only crispen up the support for our filings, but then also to get to a more we started this journey. We pursued a regulatory, legislative and judicial outcome and so all three of those passed. So we're on track with what we strategically set out to begin with. What's the July 16 decision that we're waiting on? Okay. So this would be this is on the cases that were remanded back to the commission. So once they go back to the Public Service Commission, they in essence have 120 days to make a decision based on those cases that did not go through to the Supreme Court. So you got several moving parts that are going on here from right, on the remand, right? Yes. It has been remanded back to the Missouri Commission, yes. Got it. I got it. Okay. And on the guidance, the long term guidance, the base year is still 2019? Yes. I chuckle, Michael. It's a fair question. I think the answer is if you look at our capital spend program over 5 years and driving rate base growth of 7% to 8%, we expect that we should be able to drive the kind of growth that we've talked about in the long term over the bottom line. I chuckle because we're all dealing with and we've spent a lot of time and I know our peers are because you've been on those calls, a lot of time dealing with the current situation. And in the fullness of time, as we understand what's happening in the current year 2020, we'll find a way to rebase and make sure everybody understands. But right now, we're just trying to make sure that we and our customers get through this year and we do it in a fashion Yes, that would be my understanding. I mean, I think a lot of people are trying to look through 2020. Yes, that would be my understanding. I mean, I think a lot of people are trying to look through 2020 as an abnormal year. So that's just wanted to see what that's going on. It's definitely going to be an abnormal year. Yes. I think a lot of people would like to look through this year. Alright, thank you very much guys and stay safe and healthy. Thanks, Mark. Thanks, Mark. Thanks, Mark. Mark. The next question comes from Brian Russo with Sidoti. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Good morning, Brian. Good morning, Brian. Hey, just curious on the weather normalization mechanism in Missouri that was ineffective. What in so insofar as further discussions with regulators and or during your next rate case to fix it? Or can it ever be perfect? All right. Well, good morning, Brad. This is Steve Lindsey. Thanks for the question. And I wish I knew all the answers to that because it's a very complex formula. I think the one thing I would say is we have something in place now that we didn't have before, which is positive. It did help, but it didn't completely address the differences between weather obviously and the volumes and the revenues. So I think there's a couple of pieces to it. One is and I think Steve even mentioned this, first of all, it does not even include the small commercial class and some of those others that are really weather sensitive and look and behave a like the residential class. So I think that's one opportunity that if you look at other weather normalization mechanisms in the country, they do include that. So that's clear an opportunity. The other is that it's not linear. And what I mean by that is every day isn't the same, every week isn't the same as you go through the month. So you could have some outcomes that show results of degree days that didn't really translate to the way gas flowed from a customer's perspective. So I think there's opportunity as we move And again, it's a start. It's not perfect. We recognize that and we think we'll be able to make a pretty strong presentation as to where the deficiencies are because again, the program is intended to mitigate risk. As Steve indicated, if it's too cold, we shouldn't benefit. If it's too warm, we shouldn't be harmed and it's really to try to tighten that band. And what we would look to do going forward is to tighten the band even closer than what it is now. Got it. And remind me, what percent of the overall bill is a fixed charge? And that roughly depends on the type of year that you're having, but it could be 20% to 25%, I think, based on a residential customer. And again, that has variability, obviously, based on volumetric fees comes in. Okay, great. And just on the Supreme Court denial of your request for rehearing. Remind me how many 1,000,000 of dollars of revenues is that? And when might that impact net economic earnings? Is it after a commission decision, so little part of July? Or from a legal perspective, do you now have more clarity as to the recovery or of those costs. I'm curious to when a provision might be taken against net economic earnings? Yes, Brian, this is Steve Rasche. There's a detailed chart in the appendix to our presentation that you can take a look at, which really outlines the various layers of ISRS. The total provision that is the total of all the collections that are included in the rulings that were that are part of the appellate court decision and then the Supreme Court's decision not to take it on are Supreme Court's decision not to take it on are $16,900,000 and that we continue to collect on those and we're collecting $2,000,000 and change every quarter. So up until the time that the Missouri Public Service Commission makes a final determination, we will continue to collect those funds. I would point out there are various components of that $16,900,000 Part of it has to do with the conclusion whether cast iron or bare steel was worn out and deteriorated and another component about incidental plastics that are replaced along with longer lines of the cast iron or bare steel. And the Public Service Commission is going to have to weigh in based upon the remand from the appellate court on each one of those. When they reach their decision and that's that July 15 date that we've been talking about, then the commission will not only decide on how to handle each of those individual ISRS determinations, but it will also determine whether or not the amounts will be refunded to the extent determine there's a refund or if the amounts will be used in some other fashion. And the commission has full right to be able to decide how they want to handle that. So again, at that point, once we have the determination from the Public Service Commission, then I think we're obviously economic earnings calculation and to the extent that those revenues are now not going to be revenues or earnings, then we would adjust our net economics measure at that point. And just to keep it in perspective of the $16,900,000 a little over $4,000,000 of that impacts our current year. Vast majority of it was the initial provision that we booked for the last fiscal year. Okay, got it. Understood. And then just on the equity, if I heard you correctly, you issued 10,000,000 of equity in the fiscal Q2 and that satisfied your needs for the entire year? No. I mean, if you go to our guidance page, you can see that we have a guided range of equity of $50,000,000 to $100,000,000 is our total need for the year. So in the Q1, we knocked out roughly $10,000,000 of that at the low end. And the beauty of where we stand is we do have and we're in ongoing discussions with our rating agencies. We do have some leverage and some cushion in our credit metrics, which are the ones that everybody is always looking at. So we do believe that we will be in the equity markets later this year as long as the markets continue to rebound in an orderly fashion. But it's not anything we have to do, but I think our preference is in order to maintain strong credit metrics and a balanced capital structure that it would be appropriate for us to get in the range of the equity that we've guided in our long term guidance. Okay. And then the February stipulation on $11,100,000 revenues under ISRS. Is that what you filed for? We filed for the reason why I am struggling, Brian, is that we filed for a lot of different numbers because we filed for amounts that had not been awarded for plastics in prior filings. I think the best number to think about in terms of what was our net expectation in terms of what we were going to get out of the filing, it was probably and I don't have it off the top of my head, it in the high 11s or low $12,000,000 range. And there's always some difference between what we expect and what we actually get because our generally include 45 days to 60 days worth of forecasted capital spend. And so that always gets trued up in a rate case and that is clearly what happened in this filing for RIS risk, I'm sorry. Okay. And when does the Missouri legislature end this year? Well, we're kind of writing the playbook as we go right now. There's probably at least another couple of weeks of session. I know that again this is not a special session. This was just to start up again and we were very pleased to be included as part of the legislation that's being considered. But we came out or as we talked about, we're out of both chambers and now we're in reconciliation. So we view that ours is moving forward at a pace that at least we're pleased so far. Okay, got it. Thank you very much. Thanks. The next question comes from Selman Akyol with Stifel. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning. Lots been asked and answered. So just a few follow ups and clarifications, if I could. Just following up on that last question. So we'll get a legislative response one way or another by the end of the month. If that's successful, then can you does that have any impact on sort of the July outcome in your opinion? Well, I would say that it doesn't directly because it is a looking forward, but I think what it does is give some hopefully guidance to the commission that what we've been again operating under the assumptions for over 15 years has been validated and has been cleaned up if you will in this legislation. Again, we think that everything we've been doing from this point forward from when the program went into place has met those requirements. I think this reinforces that. So hopefully from the commission's perspective, they can use that as part of their decision making in that the infrastructure that we've been upgrading does meet these requirements. I'm sure everyone on the phone is aware of it. It's not unusual for a House to produce a bill and then the Senate is sent over to the other chamber, in this case the Senate, they pretty much write it the same way, but not exactly the same way. So then the committees are created and as Steve said, it goes to conference so that they can settle those differences. So that's not unusual at all in the legislative process. Right. Let me just ask this. Your bill is not attached or it doesn't include other things that would be controversial per se. So if it could get to the Governor's desk, I think he's in the same room. I wouldn't call it controversial, but like a lot of bills, they're written in one chamber for a specific need and then it goes to the other chamber and the other chamber adds other elements, which is what happened in this instance. So that's when the 2 committees come together in conference and sort of quote clean the bill up. So and that's where we are and again that's not uncommon. Okay. I think you referenced additional investment in storage for $10,000,000 dollars How much more is to go there? Yes, Thomas, this is Steve. We're still in the process of figuring out what our long term development plan is and obviously given some other things we've been focused on. We're clearly very pleased with the operational performance of the storage field this winter and you saw that in the improved operating results. And we but we haven't yet come up with the longer range plan, but what our commitment to our investors and to you all is that we'll continue to bring you along for the journey. And so as we think about the amount that we are going to spend between now and the next call, that's the $10,000,000 that we increased in our capital spend target for this year. Okay. And then just kind of going back to the effectiveness of the weather mitigation, I know you guys looking at ways to improve that. Does that will that have to wait really until you go through your next rate case in order to be improved or could it be improved before then? That would be yes. So your question basically had to answer it. So it is part of the overall rate structure and that will be part of our next rate filing, yes. Which I would say again that's not unusual. The 2 requirements of rate case is that revenue requirement and rate design. And it's very rare for commissions to take up either rate design or revenue requirement outside of a rate case. It does occur, but it's very rare. And I would just add on, I'll get a little bit of the floor here. It's not unusual either for these mitigation mechanisms to be in place as a starting point because they are complex and there are different classes that even went in those classes. People use energy in different ways either all heating or some are more year round and those sorts of things. So they are a bit complex. So I like Steve and Steve mentioned, I was glad to see the commission work with us and start and we'll continue to refine as we stop cases over time. All right. I appreciate it. Thanks very much. Thanks, Don. Thank you. The next question comes from Richard Sunderland with JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Just one for me today. Thanks for taking the time. The STL Pipeline additional capacity, if I missed this earlier, apologies, but any update on discussions around contracting that? And I would imagine there have been some impacts from COVID, so maybe expectations at this point, if any? Yes. Thank you for the question. We'll continue to look for opportunities. But right now, first of all, I want to confirm that it did go into service and served this side of the state very well as we went through the winter. We'll continue to operate that pipeline the way it was designed to do and access gas from the Northeast to bring to this side for our customers here. Again, as opportunities emerge, but I think a lot of those opportunities have probably been put on standstill right now as we're going through some of these challenges. But as those see them, would those potentially be as soon as they see them, would those potentially be as soon as say 2021 or is this more of a long dated opportunity to put additional contracts in place and then I guess eventually add compression? Yes. So, yes, good question. We've shared with you in the past, we absolutely can add compression to the pipeline. And again, I want to echo Steve's comment from an operational perspective. The pipeline has performed very well this past winter. Even I mean it's against the backdrop of warmer winter, but we were able to exercise that pipe pretty well and from pressure and flows and so forth it operated again very well. There is additional capacity and we can't add compression and there is a market and I suspect some of that will depend on how the natural gas and industry plays out over time. There's been a lot going on in our industry as far as wells and lock in to supply sources and those kinds of things. So we'll sort that over time, but the pipeline operationally and there is the market sitting behind it. So we'll see how that plays out. Thanks for the update. Thank you. Thank and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Scott Dudley for any closing remarks. Well, thank you all for joining us. I know it's a busy earnings day. We're going to be around throughout the rest of the day and we'll look forward to catching up with many of you then. Thanks and be safe. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.