Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us and welcome to the Trimble First Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star 1 again. I would now like to hand the conference over to Rob Painter, President and CEO. Please go ahead.
Welcome, everyone. Before I get started, our presentation and safe harbor statements are available on our website. Our financial review will focus on year-over-year non-GAAP performance metrics on an organic basis. We will focus on adjusted numbers that we believe more accurately portray the underlying performance of our business. This means we will exclude the impact from the mobility business which we divested during the first quarter of 2025. As reported numbers, along with the reconciliation, are provided in the appendix of our slide presentation. The Trimble team furthered the momentum of the last couple of years and delivered a great start to the year, with top and bottom line results ahead of expectations.
Revenue at $940 million, up 12%, ARR at $2.435 billion, up 13%, and EPS above the high end of our range at $0.79. We are raising our guidance for the year. Financial performance is the scoreboard. It's the output. The game on the field or the input is delivering unique value to customers. On slide 4, I want to highlight how we are partnering with our customer, George Leslie, a Scottish-based civil engineering contractor that has embraced the Trimble ecosystem to connect the physical and digital worlds. With our platform, Trimble Connect acts as the orchestration layer of complex workflows that include marine and pier works, water and wastewater treatment, bridges and infrastructure, and energy and power.
When performing earthmoving, our laser scanners are deployed for capturing the job site in high-fidelity 3D to create a digital twin of the physical earth, while our tools back in the office power the design of the terrain model into a constructible model. Enabled by the Trimble ecosystem, this model is seamlessly deployed to our Trimble survey and machine control systems in the field to execute the work in the physical world, while our project management and scheduling capabilities are managing the work, physical to digital to physical. When performing complex steel and bridge work, they take the structural and design model that is managed within the Trimble ecosystem and then use our robotic total stations to precisely orient the digital model on the physical job site.
Trimble is the data platform through which our customer's data flows and remains in sync as the work moves from the physical to digital to physical to digital and so on. Through the power of the Trimble ecosystem, George Leslie is realizing significant productivity, quality, and efficiency in ways that Trimble uniquely delivers. Only Trimble can connect and optimize work like this. That's our connect and scale strategy in action, connecting work in the office and the field, connecting our hardware and software, connecting the physical and digital worlds. We see tremendous opportunity as we bring AI to industry workflows and further establish Trimble as the intelligence and execution layer that reconciles our customers' digital and physical realities.
Slide 5 shows four examples of Trimble AI delivering actionable outcomes and breakthrough levels of productivity across projects in airports, rail, tunnels, and roads for some of the largest and most influential companies and organizations in the industry. Only Trimble. Speaking of AI, we believe customers will adopt AI from trusted platforms like ours, where we deliver the support, cybersecurity, governance, and sustaining engineering that our customers expect and require. Integrated workflows with deep domain knowledge at scale is a differentiator and a moat. Our ecosystem of third-party connectivity and platform extensibility compounds value delivery and drives network effects, where every connection point and transaction improves the next autonomous decision, making the data not peripheral to the product, but the product itself.
In short, we see a world where AI increases the size of the addressable market, and we believe we have a compelling right to win, thus capturing additional avenues of growth. While we monetize our software and AI today primarily through named user licenses, we are architecting ourselves to scale hybrid value delivery at the intersection of licenses and consumption. This isn't just a hypothetical thought experiment. We already deliver consumption models today. For example, Trimble Transporeon transacts well over $100 million of revenue through tens of millions of annual transactions on our platform, and our recent native AI products deliver autonomous procurement and autonomous quotation on a consumption basis. In the fourth quarter of 2025, Trimble SketchUp released SketchUp AI as an add-on that is available to our subscriber base.
The hybrid add-on is an additional subscription that makes a fixed number of AI credits available to each user each month. We will continue to track market adoption of our AI capabilities along with market readiness for emerging consumption and outcome-based models as our monetization strategy evolves. Let's now turn to some segment-level highlights, starting with AECO. The team delivered another outstanding quarter. Both ARR and revenue were up 14%. Cross-sell and upsell performed well, and we extended the reach of Trimble Construction One into the Asia-Pacific region. While North America remains our largest market, we are pleased with our performance in Europe as well as the APAC region. Last week, we launched an integration with SketchUp and Anthropic Claude.
This makes it easy for Claude users to create Trimble SketchUp 3D models directly from conversational text, image, or speech prompts enabled by a SketchUp AI-MCP service that allows Claude to create and modify SketchUp files. The immediate monetization is downstream in our SketchUp subscriptions. After starting in Claude, users will bring their files into SketchUp to further iterate on the design, leverage SketchUp's real-time collaboration features to engage project stakeholders, create visualizations, perform daylight analysis, and more. The midterm revenue opportunity is expanding the addressable market by converting Claude users into Trimble customers. This is just one of the many examples you are going to see from us throughout 2026. Turning to slide 6, on April 2, we announced the acquisition of Document Crunch. For context, construction is a relatively low-margin industry, yet remains one of the most risk-exposed industries in the world.
More than 80% of projects exceed budget. When disputes arise, the average claim in North America tops $60 million. The root cause is consistent. Errors in project documents and stakeholders failing to understand their obligations. With Document Crunch, we're addressing this directly. We're establishing a new AI-powered risk management category within Trimble, bringing contract intelligence and compliance automation into the project management, estimating, and ERP workflows our customers already rely on. That's just the beginning. Think about what that means at scale, layering these intelligence tools across tens of millions of projects in Trimble Connect, billions in construction managed through our ERPs, and field workflows that have never before been connected to the contract. We're connecting the field to the office, to the risk, to the execution, and embedding it all into Trimble Construction One. This isn't just simply AI document review.
We are linking the contract and risk elements to the execution in the field and to multiple stakeholders throughout the ecosystem, thereby addressing the core reason for disputes. Early customer feedback has been exceptional, and we're moving quickly to expand reach and to leverage this AI-first development team to organically address new categories. Moving next to Field Systems, the physical side of Trimble outperformed in the quarter, with particular strength once again in civil construction. Both ARR and revenue were up 12%. We continue to innovate and execute with end market strength and infrastructure and data centers supporting our growth.
The strategic highlight of the quarter was seeing our team in action at the ConExpo Construction Industry Trade Show in Las Vegas in February, where the 140,000 plus construction professional attendees were able to see Trimble showcased in the booths of 24 leading construction OEMs from North America, Europe, and Asia, thus demonstrating the site technology leadership position we hold in the market. Extensibility is core to our connect and scale strategy and crucial to extending our leadership position. At our booth, we were able to showcase support for more machine categories, such as compact machines, along with new functionality for excavators equipped with dynamic swing booms. We also introduced an integration with ground-penetrating radar for real-time asphalt compaction quality control.
Combined with our expansion of points of distribution in the market and the linkage with workflow as described in the customer example in my opening remarks, we are as confident as ever that we have the right strategy at the right time, executed by the right team. Moving now to transportation, ARR was up 9% and revenue was up 7%. Our booking strength in the quarter gives us confidence in our growth plans for the year. The AI ambitions of this team are inspiring and cutting edge. To unlock the potential of AI for product development requires a systemic paradigm shift across the entire product development life cycle. Today, the vast majority of new code is generated with AI tools, and our product development organization is fundamentally rewiring how we work, which in turn is increasing our velocity.
In addition, we are approaching our target to dedicate 10% of our development resources to an applied AI organization that is tasked with agentic development as well as safe AI deployment. With a couple of recent customer wins and selling autonomous procurement and autonomous quotation in North America, we are building momentum and demonstrating that we can bring Transporeon capabilities to North America and that we can cross-sell into our carrier base. While the macro environment remains challenged, the North American market is beginning to show some signs of market recovery. In Europe, we continue to hold our competitive win ratios and grow our network density. In the first quarter, our new logo growth increased by more than 50% year-over-year, demonstrating the quality of our solutions, the available market to penetrate, and the solid execution of the team.
Phil, I'll turn it over to you now.
Thanks, Rob. Let me start with capital allocation, which remains disciplined and consistent. During the first quarter, we repurchased approximately $317 million of common stock, a direct reflection of our balance sheet and cash flow strength, our confidence in the long-term value of our business, and our commitment to delivering shareholder returns. We retain a substantial $608 million under our current repurchase authorization, which continues to give us flexibility for opportunistic buybacks. Longer term, we continue to expect at least a third of our free cash flow to be used for repurchasing shares as we look to provide returns for our shareholders.
Our M&A strategy remains focused on strengthening our core market positions and adding capabilities that allow us to run the cross-sell motions and provide high ROI for our customers, such as our recent acquisition of Document Crunch. In the first quarter, we also divested a small business in Field Systems as we continue to sharpen our focus on core competencies and allocate capital and resources to the highest returns. Let's review the first quarter starting on slide 7. We delivered organic revenue growth of 12%, which exceeded our outlook. This performance was driven by the strength of AECO and Field Systems, while Transportation and Logistics delivered positive growth despite a constrained freight market. ARR was in line with our outlook at 13% to a record $2.435 billion. The continued growth in our recurring revenue base provides a predictable and resilient foundation for our business.
Gross margins expanded to 71%, and we achieved EBITDA margins of 27.4%, which is a 150 basis point expansion compared to the prior year. Reported earnings per share was $0.79 for the quarter, $0.07 better than the midpoint and above the high end of our guidance. Moving to the balance sheet and cash flow items on slide 8, our first quarter reported free cash flow remains strong at $275 million. Our sound balance sheet provides financial flexibility with $234 million of cash and a leverage ratio of 1.1 times, which is well below our long-term target ratio of 2.5 times. Next is our segment review, starting with AECO on slide 9. AECO delivered a strong quarter, performing in line with expectations.
It achieved a record 1.51 billion of ARR, posting 14% ARR growth and 14% revenue growth for the quarter. Operating margin was 31.5%, a 420 basis point expansion over the prior year. Turning to Field Systems on slide 10, revenue was up 12% in the first quarter while absorbing headwinds due to the continued model conversions to recurring revenue. The execution by the team resulted in another strong quarter of ARR growth at 12%. Operating margin was 28.8%, which is slightly down, primarily due to timing of OpEx and growth initiatives in the quarter. Finally, Transportation and Logistics on slide 11. The segment delivered revenue growth of 7% and ARR growth of 9% for the quarter. This represents a sequential improvement from the previous quarter.
Operating margins were at 24.2%, which is a 300 basis point expansion from the previous year. Turning to slide 12, let's review our updated outlook for the year. The midpoint of our 2026 full year guidance for revenue is $3.875 billion, a $15 million increase from the prior guidance and represents approximately 8% growth. We are also increasing our EPS guidance to $3.55. We expect the midpoint of ARR growth at 13% and EBITDA margins at 29.7% as our model delivers strong operating leverage while allowing us to reinvest for future growth. Regarding cash flow, we expect free cash flow to be approximately 1 times non-GAAP net income, and that we deliver free cash flow greater than non-GAAP net income over the long term.
Slide 13 breaks down the full year metrics by segment. The trajectory across all three segments is consistent with our prior guidance and remains fully aligned to deliver the Investor Day company targets for 2027: $3 billion in ARR, $4 billion in revenue, and 30% EBITDA margins. Finally, regarding our second quarter outlook on Slide 14, we are setting the midpoints of our guidance at $950 million for revenue, which is approximately 7.5% growth, earnings per share at $0.80, and ARR growth at 13%. We expect EBITDA margins at 27.7%, a 30 basis points expansion year over year. Back to you, Rob.
Thanks, Phil. I'll end by summarizing 3 key takeaways from the quarter. First, our connect and scale strategy differentiates at the intersection of physical and digital. There's no other company as uniquely positioned as Trimble. Second, we are leveraging AI to transform how we work so that we can transform how our customers work. We believe customers will gravitate towards leveraging our platform for their own AI ambitions because we are connecting their data, their workflow, and their industry ecosystems. We believe AI will expand the size of the addressable market, and we are ready to adapt our business models to meet the market where it is. Third, the quality of our strategy is driving financial performance that enables us to differentially invest back into our product and go-to-market motions to ensure the strength of our future.
My gratitude to the Trimble team and partners, as well as our investors who continue to support our strategy. Operator, let's open the line to questions.
We will now begin the question and answer session. In the interest of time, please limit yourself to 1 question and 1 follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star 1 again. We do ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you're muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by now while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Kristen Owen with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.
Hi. Good morning, and thank you for the question. Nice start to the year, guys. It sounds like things are kind of all rolling in the same direction. You lifted your guidance for AECO and Field Systems. You beat by $0.07. You lifted the guide by $0.04. I'm just kind of wondering what's, what are the back half scenarios, or how should we think about the level of conservatism that you're baking into the guide given the strong start to the year?
Hey, Kristen, it's Phil, and thanks for the question. Let me start with.
We're in line with our previous guide from earlier this year. Actually, in fact, we raised the guide for the year, and we're on track to be at or ahead of our 30/40/30 model that we put out in Investor Day. I'd say we have the most visibility we've ever had at the company level with the transformation and the ARR mix. We do have less visibility on the hardware business and in light of the conflict we see in the Middle East and uncertainty around tariff policies, along with tougher comps in the back half, we've incorporated those puts and takes into our guide and we will update you in a few months as we get more visibility on the year.
Great. That's very helpful. I wanted to dive into some of the consumption model changes that you talked about, Rob, in your prepared remarks. You know, I'm hoping to understand any early indications of how your customers are utilizing tokens for the AI tools that are currently embedded in your products. Just any sort of qualitative or quantitative data that you can provide on, like, utilization trends or where you're seeing tokens being purchased. You know, how are those early learnings informing your commercialization of AI across the platform? Thank you.
Good morning, Kristen. Yeah, I'll start by discreetly answering the token question. Quantitatively, what we can see is that the usage is growing and that almost all of those credits that are associated with those named user licenses are being consumed, and that's good because it tells us they're actually being used. Qualitatively, what I really like are the learnings we're getting from doing this because the development, the deployment, and the monetization motions are all different. If we uplevel the conversation, I think the real conversation to have is around the commercialization of AI across the platform. The tokens themselves are a tactic of commercialization. Of course, we're gonna expect to see more of them going forward, and we're building the capabilities in order to do that. At the same time, we'll deploy many additional commercial tactics.
I'll give you 2 examples. 1st one was discrete consumption and transactions. If you take autonomous procurement and autonomous quotation, within transportation, I think that's a great example of that because what we're monetizing through those particular product motions, is happening at a higher rate than the traditional non-AI capabilities that we have. We can charge more because we're demonstrating a higher ROI to our customers when we do that. A 2nd example is we'll create monetization through the good, better, best product motions where we put AI into those better and best upsell motions. I highlighted 4 examples, I think it was on slide 5 of the presentation, that give examples of this.
One of those examples would be automated feature extraction out of the large point clouds that we deliver to our customers. In that example, that automation of the feature extraction, which turns hours and days of work into minutes of work, we're monetizing that through that better and the best product sets that we deliver to our customers. In fact, in that example, when we're actually also enabling our customers to create their own proprietary datasets for their own unique work on feature extraction. Many different motions and tactics that we'll apply to achieve and reach that vision of commercializing the value that we're delivering to our customers through AI.
Your next question comes from the line of Rob Wertheimer with Melius Research. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Thank you. I had two questions on trend at AECO and then on monetization along the lines of what you were just talking about. On trend line, obviously, ARR growth was strong. The comp on core is a little bit, you know, just abnormal. I wonder if you could just talk about revenue trends for the quarter, just any sense of that. As we go through the year, there were questions on a competitor call yesterday about whether construction is improving or not, and there's lots of mixed indicators. I wonder if you might weigh in there.
Hey, Rob. Let me start as we think about the year and the guide for AECO. Let me start with connecting this to some numbers. As I look at the net new ARR that is growing and has grown in Q1, and we expect that to continue to grow throughout the year. Historically, we also benefited a little bit from a tailwind due to the conversion uplifts. We moved from maintenance and support into subscriptions. There was a bit of an uplift. If I look over history, again, that was a bit of a tailwind. Still a small amount of that left, but the impact is a bit less.
The Q1 results and the full-year guide are fully in line with our expectations and the model we put out in Investor Day with that mid-teens ARR growth and low to mid-teens revenue growth. Again, I think we're in line with the prior guide and in line with our multi-year model that we put out there.
Perfect. Fair enough. Rob, you were just touching on this, but I'm just thinking about how you monetize some of the capabilities you're bringing. You're maybe passing through tokens. I don't know if there's a margin there, but maybe you're hoping to win, you know, new logos from competitors, new people entering an ecosystem because the capabilities are bigger and easier. I wonder if you could just talk about what you see as the biggest opportunities as your capabilities expand.
Rob, the frame I have on monetization starts with value delivery and value capture. You know, the extent to which we're creating positive outcomes and positive ROI for our customers, we backwards integrate from that into then what would be the fair share for our value capture out of that. You know, we're mostly focused on the AI capabilities we can create for ourselves on leveraging the Trimble platform and the unique data set and scope and breadth and depth that we have that we have globally. In doing so, you know, we believe, yes, that we can capture new addressable market. We think we can take market share over time.
You know, I mentioned, you know, 3 different types of motions, monetization motions, in answering that last question. You know, another one would be if you think about the announcement we made with SketchUp and Claude a few days ago, in the integration there is, you know, another motion we see where we can monetize is by creating new users, creating new customers, expanding that addressable market with Claude users who weren't already SketchUp users. By creating models, in out of Claude, you need to bring those into a SketchUp model, to be able to do more with that. We'll watch that to see if that's another avenue by which we can gain new customers. We see opportunities to increase the size of the addressable market.
We see opportunities to monetize through our fair share capture of the value and the ROI that we deliver to our customers. We'll see over time how that plays out into market share.
Your next question comes from the line of Jason Celino with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hey, great. Thanks for taking my question. Rob, to that point, you know, on that SketchUp-Claude, you know, partnership that you have, you know, it sounds like the goal is to maybe try to convert, you know, Claude users to SketchUp users. Because I imagine they'll need, you know, a SketchUp seat. Is there any consumption, you know, Claude credits, you know, you were talking about, aligned with this partnership, or is it more, you know, on the license component? It wasn't lost on me that, you know, you were one of the only, you know, initial partners with this initial announcement. You know, there's one other, you know, is this a table stakes kind of feature?
You know, how do you think the, you know, partnerships with the frontier models kind of evolve for you and kind of the market?
Well, good morning, Jason. Thanks for the questions. You know, I think that this is gonna be more table stakes to have different motions and way to reach the market, and we embrace that, expect to see more from us across the portfolio. You know, that's one example where you can start with the modeling in Claude. I flip that around. The inverse, you know, what we launched in Q4 was SketchUp AI, then where you can do that we call vibe modeling, and natural language, you know, prompts within SketchUp itself to do the modeling. You want to offer it in multiple avenues, and we'll see going more, call it atomic level at the capabilities.
You know, we wanna be able to do that in Trimble Connect, for example, off of our own agentic AI platform. Multiple paths to market. We're learning a lot. You know, we're learning a lot internally. We'll learn a lot by following our customers and how they use it. We'll learn the motions and optimize the motions of how to convert users and then to bring them into the Trimble ecosystem.
Once you're, you know, in that ecosystem, let's say, if you've done a model through Claude, then I talked about it in the prepared remarks, if you want to do rendering or daylight analysis on that, you know, that creates capabilities for us to upsell and deliver more value to the customers once they're coming into SketchUp. Coming at it from multiple angles, I do think that it's table stakes that we're engaged on a number of levels, and I'm really proud of the team for the entrepreneurial spirit they're displaying. They're really going after it.
Okay. I might have missed it, but, you know, the Field Systems strength in the quarter, I'm curious if any of this was, you know, demand that was pulled forward might not be the right word, but maybe deals that closed, you know, earlier than expected. It's just I look at, you know, high oil prices, high memory prices, I wonder, you know, if clients are trying to maybe get ahead of some of those things.
Yeah, good question, Jason. Within Field Systems, the demand was strong intrinsically in the quarter, we saw no pull forward in the quarter whatsoever. The two pillars of strength in the quarter, first one's in civil construction. That really has just been continuing the trend of the last few years. I know you were at CONEXPO-CON/AGG, you saw our booth. Trimble was on 24 other OEM partner booths at CONEXPO-CON/AGG. The level of innovation the team continues to deliver, extensibility for swing booms on excavators, ground-penetrating radar integrated into machine control is impressive to see, reaching new machine types like compact track loaders, new OEM partnerships, new go-to-market partnerships with the Trimble technology outlets.
Like, the sum of activity is creating the demand from the product innovation side as well as the go-to-market reach. The survey team also had and delivered a strong quarter. I'd say also off the back of new platforms, data collector platforms they've built and continue to go to market excellent. Really strong execution in the quarter. Really just a terrific print for the team.
Your next question comes from the line of Galileo Nang from Berenberg. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Two, if I may. The first one, if I could start with the AECO. You talked about the strength in your Trimble Connect, more at Trimble Construction One, Trimble Connect outside of the U.S. I was wondering, any highlights that you could call out that's really driving the upsell, cross-sell motion as well? In the regions outside of North America, if you could maybe talk a little bit about the competitive dynamics that you're seeing as well, that'll be really helpful. Thank you.
Hey, good morning. This is Rob. I'll take the question. With respect to Trimble Construction One, we launched the capabilities in Asia Pacific in the quarter. It's obviously still early as a result of that, but that to me is a real highlight because we've seen the positive benefits of that through North America and Europe. Within Europe, we brought ProjectSight to Europe in the last couple of quarters. The team is doing a really nice job starting to take that to market. In fact, I think the European growth was even faster than the North American growth in the quarter, that would be indicative of the cross-sell and upsell motion.
Competitively, this is a unique set of capabilities we have at Trimble inside of that TC One, offering the breadth and depth of what we can bring to our customers, much less than when we now intersect what we can do with Field Systems and AECO. Uniquely positioned at a competitive standpoint. Strong highlights that to me with the cross-sell and upsell that translated into the strength, not only the ARR and revenue beat, but also the bookings that support that ongoing growth here for the rest of the year.
That's really helpful. Thank you. My second question is about around the SketchUp to Claude connector. You know, really exciting. I think someone's already flagged it as well. Only a few software vendors are follow this approach in this design software space. I guess I was just thinking more in terms of risk. I was wondering, you know, how would it work in terms of the data created in SketchUp through, or the users coming through Claude? Does Anthropic have access to that data, and is there any possibility that they might be able to replicate some of the SketchUp features through the data access that they might have going forward? Is it something that maybe we shouldn't worry about it at all?
I don't see a near-term concern on that relative to what Claude or another LLM provider could do in that respect. What we like about it is, in fact, we see more opportunity to expand the addressable market for people who are not Trimble customers today. What they have to do to be able to use the service is to create a Trimble identity. That's important so we can actually know who the user is. We believe we can capture customers and users who haven't used the tool before. We'd see a net opportunity to expand the size of the addressable market.
It becomes relatively easy to do that modeling because you're doing so, through, you know, text, through text prompts, in order to create that. Our opportunity then from a downstream monetization play is to create new SketchUp users and then to upsell those SketchUp users, into inside, excuse me, the Trimble Construction One offering.
Your next question comes from the line of Jerry Revich with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Yes. Hi. Good morning, everyone. Rob, I wonder if you could just talk about just a minute on all of the data that you folks have and the value of bringing that together using the AI tools. Is there a way to quantify in terms of the number of projects that you folks have in the system, et cetera, just to build comfort around the ability to essentially leverage AI to drive incremental ARR as opposed to the risk factors that everybody's looking at?
Good morning, Jerry. You know, you've heard me talk before about trillions, billions, millions and thousands. Trillions of dollars of construction run through Trimble today. Tens of billions of freight run through Trimble. We have millions of users of our software, hundreds of thousands of instruments and machines in the real physical world operate on Trimble. That is singularly unique. If we talk about, I'll double-click within that, and we take Trimble Connect, which provides that single source of truth, creates that digital twin between the physical and digital. Today, inside of Trimble Connect, more than 30 million projects have been created. There's been over 50 million users in Trimble Connect since inception. We have thousands of integrations, third-party integrations into the individual applications we have across Trimble.
We have over 130 extensions, integrations that have been created inside our Trimble Marketplace, which is part of Trimble Connect. In fact, at Dimensions, at our user conference in November, which we'd love to see you and the community attend, we're actually gonna hold our first developer conference as part of that. You take this unique set of proprietary data, the density of that data, this is singularly unique. Creating the ecosystem and the partner network to build upon this is why we see such an opportunity for AI to be a logical extension of our connect and scale strategy, not a, really not even a separate initiative.
We really think there's a lot of compelling aspects here for us and for our customers.
Super. From a margin standpoint, was really impressed with transportation and logistics performance in the quarter. I don't know if the margins exceeded your internal plan, or if you could just unpack the drivers of margins in the quarter. You know, I think typically, you do see a step up in margins in the business 2Q versus 1Q. I just wanna make sure there's nothing in the base that's extraordinary as we think about the bridge in that business from here.
Hey, Jerry, it's Phil. Yeah, thanks for the question. I'm really pleased with the team. As we got lap ourselves, we had the mobility divestiture last year, there were some stranded costs within that business the team had worked on throughout the year. Really, really happy with the performance. We're guiding to about the same rate at the end of the year, throughout the year, the 24%. I think you can view this as structural as we go throughout the year.
Your next question comes from the line of Tami Zakaria with JP Morgan. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning. Very nice results. Congrats on that. This is a question from me who's not a designer, and I don't use SketchUp or Claude to draw 360 models, so I apologize for the simplistic nature of the question. About the Claude partnership, it sounds very interesting, and I appreciate the TAM increased potential. Could you sort of explain how do you have confidence that Claude users would eventually migrate to using SketchUp instead of just staying on Claude that probably keeps getting better at giving customized designs on the platform? Maybe a better way to ask is, what's there in SketchUp now that Claude doesn't and will not be able to help with?
Hey, Tami. Good morning. Thanks for the question. I will be your personal sales rep to sell you a license of SketchUp and make you a user. Until then, Imagine going to Claude through natural language prompting. You don't have to be a user of the underlying modeling technology. You're new to the software, and you wanna create a model. You can do so through just typing the prompt of what you want. If you want a new patio for the backyard and it's of a certain size, let's say, dimensionality and style that you wanna put in there. Claude's gonna deliver you a model.
We believe that that's not enough. You need to do something with that model. If you just wanted a picture of the model, you could create that in Claude, but that's not actually gonna translate into the, to the workflow. What you then do is if you've created that design of that model in Claude, you bring it into the SketchUp ecosystem in order to iterate on it. The one thing we know with a design is it's not static. You don't just do a prompt and then you're done. You wanna iterate on that. You wanna collaborate on that. Like, one of the real powers of SketchUp is the ability to have multi-user collaboration. Think about the coordination that an architect has with an engineer, much less a contractor or the owner.
You're not going to do that through the LLM. You're doing that through SketchUp and then leveraging Trimble Connect to drive that collaboration. When you want to perform that professional-grade analysis, and you want to do the energy modeling of that or the rendering on that model, you're going to come into the authoring application or the authoring tool, which is SketchUp, to do that. I go back to the ability to have started in Claude in this example, is we're lowering the barrier to entry to create that next generation of AI-first professionals who then can bring those models into SketchUp for the next iterations of that.
I don't know if that I hope that helps you a little bit understand that, is that it's, you know, insufficient to complete a workflow with that initial model that you've created in an LLM. I agree with I think the assertion you're making is that it's going to get better over time, and you can imagine then we'll put more capabilities into those engines up front over time. We want to bring more Trimble capabilities throughout our ecosystem that direction as well. So much of that, again, I see as an ability to create new users for our tools. Remember that within the tools we have themselves, whether it's SketchUp or every other software application we're delivering at Trimble, we also have AI inside of those tools.
Think of Claude inside AI, Claude inside of SketchUp as opposed to SketchUp inside of Claude. We work it from multiple angles.
That is extremely helpful. Thank you so much. My second question, I wanted to double-click on Field Systems. The year started off really strong, but you're still targeting low to mid-single digit organic growth. Can you remind us what you're expecting for 2Q? To get to your full year guide, we need to see a lot of slowdown versus the first quarter number you had. Is it conservatism? Are you seeing an impact from the Iran war in 2Q, and you expect that to stay for the rest of the year? Any color on Field Systems?
Yeah. Hey, Tami. It's Phil. I'd say, you know, the first quarter obviously reflected what we saw last year, particularly in civil construction. Rob mentioned. Geospatial performed well in the first quarter. As we start to think about the rest of the year in that business, this is the one that we have the least visibility with the hardware particularly. We start to get into last year, we had really good strong second half of the year. Part of this is the year-over-year, the comps. Part of this is the Middle East, uncertainty around the tariff policy, just some of the macros. I'd say, you know, we've incorporated the risk.
We also incorporate the opportunities as we think about the guide and where the strength of the market is. At this point, again, we started the year very well, we'll continue to keep an eye on the market and update you in a few months.
Your next question comes from the line of Joshua Tilton with Wolfe Research.
Hey, guys, thanks for sneaking me in. Congrats on a good quarter, and just two quick ones from me. The first one is kind of a follow-up question to, I think, a question a lot of my peers have been trying to ask you on the call so far. I think that's around the Claude integration announcement. I think what a lot of people are trying to understand is just as you know, as you integrate more and more with Claude, you are increasing your users' productivity. I think people are trying to understand how are you guys setting up yourselves to capture that increase in productivity that the Claude connector will provide your average SketchUp user.
I think the second question that I have, just a quick follow-up, is, on that last Field Systems comment that you mentioned, is it fair to assume that there is more conservatism in the Field Systems outlook, today than there was 90 days ago, given everything that's going on in the world and the visibility that you just spoke to? Thanks.
Hey, Josh, good morning. It's Rob. I'll take both of those. With respect to Field Systems, I'd say what I want you to assume is that we've actually increased the guide for the year. I want you to see that we don't see that anything has fundamentally changed in the market. We're 3 months from a reporting standpoint. We're 3 months into the year. We got 9 more to go. Let's see where things are, how they're shaking out in 3 months from now. No fundamental change in view in the Field Systems business. In fact, if anything, you could say it's better because of the raise, some of the raise we put, we put through. That's what you need to hear on that one.
With respect to Claude, as we integrate Trimble capabilities with LLMs and increase our users' productivity, what I would want you to hear there is we start by increasing our users' productivity within the tools they already use from us today. That's the primary place we start. When I think about going the other way, if when we're working with Claude, with the SketchUp example or other examples that I think you'll see in time to come, we think of those as opportunities to create new users. We think of that as opportunities for our existing users to start, if that's where they wanna start, and then bring those models into to SketchUp.
I just can't stress enough that for the professional user, let's separate maybe the professional user from the consumer user of SketchUp. At that professional user level, you need to bring those files into our ecosystem if you're gonna iterate, if you're gonna collaborate, and if you're gonna perform professional-grade analysis. That's the difference between the professional user and, let's say, the maker, the consumer user of SketchUp. I totally embrace SketchUp consumers. That is the bulk of the user count that we have in that community, and it creates that brand and the content that we have in it. We really monetize at the professional grade level. That is fundamentally different set of workflow, and hopefully, that helps answer the question.
Your next question comes from the line of Chad Dillard with Bernstein. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning, guys. I'm gonna continue on the SketchUp and Claude line of questioning. A few from me. I guess, first of all, like from an economic standpoint, I'm assuming you guys, you know, price for this added feature. Like, how do you guys think about the split up between what Trimble gets versus what Claude gets? Who owns the data? I'm just trying to understand, like, how does this compress the learning curve going to more of an agentic approach? Maybe lastly, you know, this is, you know, SketchUp was like, kind of like the first deployment, but where else do you see this sort of, you know, relationship evolving, you know, across your different product sets?
Hey, good morning, Chad. This is Rob. I'll take that. Okay, there's a few topics in there. Hopefully, I can capture them here. The data is the customer's data, so I always wanna orient starting there. That customer is creating a model, an example that we talked about today. That model is downloadable, you can bring it into SketchUp. From an economic standpoint, let me highlight two different motions we have. One motion is the announcement we had in Q4 of last year where we have SketchUp AI. It's an add-on subscription to the SketchUp license you already have. With that SketchUp AI license, it's only $11.99 a month for that add-on license.
You get a set of credits for it, or tokens, but think of it as credits that you get. From that, I'll call it economic standpoint, that is directly to Trimble. It's all Trimble and obviously there's a variable cost when we're on the consumption side of that. We built that into the pricing model. What we are asking about with Claude, if you start in Claude where and you create that model that's downloadable, what we really see is the economic model there is to create users downstream. That's the way I would think about that. How can we create those users downstream? At least today, we start by requiring them to have a Trimble ID.
When you have that Trimble ID, that's how you're able to download that SketchUp model and then bring it into SketchUp as the authoring tool. There's multiple paths to monetization. I think about when I in the first, one of the first, I think it was the second question we got this morning, when we talk about tokens, I see that as a tactic. That's one of multiple tactics that we have. We'll have tactics of monetization, where we bundle AI capabilities into the good, better, best offerings, and clearly we wanna upsell customers into the better and the best. We'll provide a higher value. We'll monetize there. We'll monetize purely as standalone transaction or consumption.
You know, one of the reasons we were attracted to the Transporeon acquisition when we did it is there's well over $100 million of transactional revenue that comes from that business. We don't have to imagine a world with transactional revenue. We have a world with transactional or consumption-based revenue. Inside of that, we've got autonomous, which are In other words, those are AI-first products that we're monetizing on a consumption based level. We're open to multiple doors and avenues as the tactics to monetize the capabilities that we're bringing to market. We think we can do so in a way that expands the size of the addressable market while we're doing it. All of this is early days.
We see it as virtue, that we're out there in the market, that we're testing, that we're learning, and that we're leading.
Great. That's helpful. Second question. Can you talk about what Trimble's doing to shift from like the, I guess, like the co-pilot or assistant-based AI to more of an autonomous workflow product? I guess one thing I'm trying to get at is, you know, do you have all the everything in your tech stack inside the four walls of Trimble, or do you need to go out and acquire some of those capabilities? Then, you know, where is, you know, some of the low-hanging fruit today to deploy autonomous workflow in your products?
Chad, let me come at that from a couple of different angles. It's an interesting, it's an interesting question. In terms of our own agentic AI development, we have multiple teams in the company that are working on it. But really twofold. One, from the engineering construction, which is the intersection of Field Systems and AECO, and the second in transportation. Each of those teams have agentic AI teams, and we believe we don't need to go acquire, let's say, an agentic AI platform because we're doing it ourselves. We wanna do that organically. Now, the Document Crunch example is one where we acquired to create a new category.
In this case, an AI-powered risk management category, where we see through Document Crunch that we can link contract intelligence and compliance automation, and link that with the project management that we deliver at Trimble, with estimating that we deliver at Trimble, and with the ERP workflows we have at Trimble. That's singularly unique. It's bespoke. It's domain specific. That creates a new category. We're open to that. The last example I'll give you is really coming more at it from a Field Systems perspective. I'm gonna sort of maybe take a play on the word of autonomy. You know, Trimble's been an autonomy company for decades. We happen to call it machine control and guidance. It's between level 2 and 3 autonomy today.
We already are an autonomy company. We see what underlies that is a grade control engine. We see autonomy as a feature extension of the grade control engine that we take to market today. We will, on our own, continue to work up the stack of in autonomy because we see autonomy as a progressive series of automation, and we'll create extensibility on top of our grade control engine platform. That's how we reach these new categories, whether they're safety applications, whether they're ground-penetrating radar applications, whether they're new machine-type integrations. A lot of which we can believe we can deliver when we focus on the underlying platform and extensibility of that.
Your next question comes from the line of Clarke Jeffries with Piper Sandler. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hello. Thank you for taking the question, and I apologize if I missed this, but I believe reported ARR for AECO was 17% versus the 14% organic. Was there something driving that? I'd assume Document Crunch is gonna be in a future quarter, when that closes. Am I missing something there?
Hey, Clarke. No, the difference is the FX. There's still a benefit with the weaker dollar for the first quarter of this year. That's the difference.
Understood. Okay. Second question, maybe just following up on one of the questions around operating margin. I mean, it does seem pretty exceptional what happened in AECO and transportation and logistics from a gross margin and operating margin perspective. Just maybe could we talk about the OpEx timing that did affect Field Systems? To what extent is that one time and may resolve itself in future quarters in terms of not have that lump of OpEx? Anything to kind of speak about whether or not we're really getting to a point where the leverage of the recurring revenue across these portfolios are starting to really pick up on the margin benefit here? Thanks.
Yeah. Hey, Clarke. Phil again. At the company level, really good progress on the margin expansion. What I really like about the company model is there's an and in there. We're able to expand margins, and we're able to reinvest in the growth. I think the teams have done really well. As I think about I think you asked this specific question in Field Systems. We did have some CONEXPO Rob had mentioned, trade shows in Q1, so we had had some additional expenses, and that's where I was saying some of the timing when I mentioned that. There's a couple other things on the innovation side, particularly in FedRAMP for our certification that we're investing in and what I mentioned about the investing in future growth. That's one of the additional expenses.
If you look at what we guided for the year, we ended up in Q1 about 28.8% on OI, and we're guiding toward 31% for the rest of the year. We see improvement.
Your next question comes from the line of Jonathan Ho with William Blair.
Hi. Good morning. I wanted to start out with Document Crunch. Can you give us a sense of how you can cross-sell this to your base? You know, maybe what does the economics sort of look like in terms of that incremental add-on?
Hey, Jonathan. Good morning. You know, I think as you heard me say in the prepared remarks, it creates a new high value category for us in AI-powered risk management. To think about the billions of construction that runs through our ERP today and the tens of millions projects we have in Trimble Connect, the project management capabilities, think about the tools we have in the field. There's an enormous amount of data when we think about linking that contract intelligence and compliance automation that comes from Document Crunch into those project management estimating and ERP workflows that we already have today. The value proposition is pretty clear in terms of the risk that comes with the construction industry, which I think is relatively well understood.
It's a, particularly in North America, it's a litigious industry. Claims are high dollars, in an industry that happens to already be low, low margin. This goes, you know, well beyond any kind of document review in order to really power that risk management for our customers. Now, okay, with that value proposition, how we take it to market, we'll bundle that inside of Trimble Construction One. Out of the gate, we go about it through, I'll call it, traditional cross-selling. We'll build the motions to more tightly integrate it with Trimble Construction One, in other words, that it's on one piece of paper coming from Trimble.
We like what we see out of the gate, relative to customer inquiry in terms of the press that the deal has generated. It's getting nice coverage. Our selling teams are excited to have it, and customers are telling us this is exactly where they wanna go. That intersection of gotta have the right product, meet the right go-to-market motion, feeling good about the, this one, and stay tuned, and we'll keep you updated how it's going.
Great. Just as a quick follow-up, with the use of AI potentially, you know, maybe displacing some workers, do you see any threat to any of the seat-based licensing models that you have as well? Or, you know, is there the opportunity to shift to, you know, maybe more value-based pricing over time? Thank you.
You know, we go back to that monetization conversation we've had in the prepared remarks and through some of the Q&A. That's one of the reasons you see us talking about hybrid models. We do have a belief that we'll see more hybrid models, hybrid at the intersection of the named user license and consumption. At the same time, we have some consumption-only businesses and capabilities as well. There's multiple tactics that we can deploy in that respect. Our industry today is not demand constrained. We have our customers have significant backlog. There's a labor shortage. You know, we're hundreds of thousands of workers short in North America alone.
In the near term, it's hard to see any kind of fundamental worker displacement. We'll always wanna anchor to what's the value that we're delivering for our customers, and then to me, back into the monetization, which is a tactic. We're not shelfware. We're not a nice to have thing that you use every once in a while. We are fundamental to our system, to our customers' work. If you're a worker out in the field, you're using our tools all day long. If you're a project manager, you're managing an ERP, you're a civil designer, you're a mechanical estimator, you're an architect, you're working inside of Trimble all day long.
Long as long as we've got these labor shortages, as long as we continue to provide the value, I feel good about our ability to continue to drive the revenue in the business.
Your next question comes from the line of Guy Hardwick with Barclays. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning. Hi, Rob, Phil, and Michael. Maybe I missed this earlier, apologies if I did, but it looks like you beat your Q1 guidance for revenues were about $35 million, and you've raised your full year guidance for revenues by only $15 million. I look at the supplementary information, it looks like Q1 2026 is gonna be a higher proportion of total revenue than you and half by about half a point for both quarters. Is it really a pull forward you saw in Q1, but at this point you don't feel you can raise the full year as much as you beat in the first quarter? That's the first part of my question. The second part, you also took the top end of your EBITDA guidance down 20 basis points.
Just wondering, was that really mix-driven or was there anything else for reason for that?
Hey, good morning, guys. This is Rob. I'll add color to what Phil has already talked about in the call, in the prepared remarks and in the Q&A. Answer, no pull forward in the quarter. Really by our own policy, I do not like to raise guidance after the first quarter, to be three months into the year. That's the standard way I wanna approach it. Given the strength of that Q1, we did flow $15 million of that into the year. I'm thinking about it from the perspective of the year. I feel good about where we're positioned now, feel good about the rest of the year.
As we all know, there's volatility, uncertainty out in the world. We'll update you in 3 months where we are there. Really just think about it as there's a beat and a raise, and it's within the frame of wanting to hold that model for the year.
Just as a follow-up, looks like you're getting very close to 2027. Potential for meeting some of the 2027 targets this year, potentially on the EBITDA margin line. You're probably getting questions from investors about future targets. What could we hear about 2028 targets or beyond? Is that something you would look at maybe later this year?
A good question. I think that's important to re-reiterate that the 30/40/30 model, $3 billion ARR, $4 billion revenue, 30% op margins in 2027. Look at the numbers that are in the guide that Phil put forward, we are well on track for that play forward operating leverage on top of revenue growth into 2027. It stands to reason that, you know, why we are affirming our path to that 2027 model. We're continuing to deliver and balance the short-term and the long-term progression of Trimble. We're not yet ready to talk about 2028 or to set a frame on that. We haven't yet even thought about when would be the next logical Investor Day to have.
That we think it would be smart to put something together for our user conference in November to invite the analyst community investors to see Trimble in action at the Trimble Dimensions in Las Vegas in November. See that, and I think you can get renewed appreciation for the uniqueness and the quality of what we're doing and why we would continue to have conviction that 2028, you know, would continue the path of growth and margin expansion that we're delivering today.
With that, we have reached the end of the Q&A session. This concludes today's call. Thank you all for attending. You may now disconnect.