Welcome to the Xylem first quarter earnings conference call. At this time, all participants have been placed on a listen-only mode, and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. If you would like to ask a question at that time, please press star one on your touch-tone phone. If at any point your question has been answered, you may remove yourself from the queue by pressing the pound key. We ask that you please pick up your handset to allow optimal sound quality. Lastly, if you should require operator assistance, please press star zero. I would now like to turn the call over to Matthew Latino, Manager of Investor Relations.
Thank you, Paula, good morning, everyone, and welcome to Xylem's first quarter 2017 earnings conference call. With me today are Chief Executive Officer, Patrick Decker, and Chief Financial Officer, Mark Rajkowski. They will provide their perspective on Xylem's first quarter 2017 results and discuss the full-year outlook for 2017. Following our prepared remarks, we will address questions related to the information covered on the call. I'll ask that you please keep to one question and a follow-up and then return to the queue. As a reminder, this call and our webcast are accompanied by a slide presentation available in the investor section of our website at www.xylem.com. A replay of today's call will be available until midnight on June 2nd. Please note the replay number is 800-585-8367, the confirmation code is 41774098.
Additionally, the call will be available for playback via the investor section of our website under the heading Presentations. Please turn to slide two. We will make some forward-looking statements on today's call, including references to future events or developments that we anticipate will or may occur in the future. These statements are subject to future risks and uncertainties, such as those factors described in Xylem's most recent annual report on Form 10-K and in subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Please note that the company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, actual events or results could differ materially from those anticipated. Please turn to slide three. We have provided you with a summary of our key performance metrics, including both GAAP and non-GAAP metrics.
For purposes of today's call, all references will be on an adjusted basis unless otherwise indicated, non-GAAP financials have been reconciled for you and are included in the appendix of the presentation. Now, please turn to slide four, I will turn the call over to our CEO, Patrick Decker.
Thanks, Matt, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us to review our first quarter results. We started off the year well, delivering solid results in the first quarter that were in line, if not slightly better than our expectations. Once again, our diversified product portfolio and end market exposure helped to balance our performance. This positions us well to deliver on our full-year commitments. We entered the quarter facing some challenging year-over-year comparisons, namely in our businesses serving the public utility sector. While those tough comps are reflected in our results, we remain encouraged by the underlying fundamentals in that end market, which I'll get to in a few moments. Our Sensus business is off to a great start this year, delivering strong top-line growth.
We are continuing to integrate this business with early work underway to begin executing against the promising revenue and cost synergies we discussed at our recent Investor Day. Our teams executed well. Our focus on driving productivity initiatives delivered a 33% year-over-year increase in continuous improvement savings in the quarter, further demonstrating that we are still in the early chapters of our self-help story. This progress enabled us to offset cost inflation and continue to invest in strategic growth initiatives. At our Investor Day last month, we had a comprehensive discussion about our objectives and long-term plans as well as market outlook. For the benefit of those who weren't able to join us, I thought I'd touch on a few of the key points we made there and talk about our results for the quarter in that context.
A primary theme of our discussion in Raleigh was how we are driving growth. This is a critical lens through which we are prioritizing our activities, and we have a number of actions underway to accelerate profitable growth. First, as we discussed there, we've made two significant organizational changes that are realigning sales teams and businesses to take better advantage of our scale and our broad product and service offerings. We've combined Xylem Analytics, Sensus, and Visenti to create one optimized business that focuses on sensing technologies. This is a powerful combination that will enable us to better leverage the strengths and capabilities of each entity and move faster in developing smart solutions for customers. Second, we've consolidated our various Water Infrastructure and Applied Water sales teams across North America into one commercial team that is now organized around what we refer to as industry verticals.
Said another way, common customer sets. This structure will make it easier for customers to do business with us because they have one point of contact who can provide easy access to our full portfolio of solutions that are relevant to their business. We've already done this in Europe and the emerging markets, and the results give us confidence in the value of this structure. These organization moves are well underway, and we expect both to be growth accelerators. As I mentioned earlier, our diverse end market exposure continues to benefit our overall performance. During the quarter, our total pro forma organic revenue growth, which includes Sensus, was up 1%. Our Sensus business delivered a 7% increase with growth across the water, electric, and gas sectors.
On an organic basis for base Xylem, revenue was down 1% for the quarter, primarily reflecting a particularly difficult year-over-year comparison as we generated a 12% increase in the public utility sector globally in the prior year period. We do continue to see signs of strength in public utilities. Orders were up 3% in the quarter, primarily driven by public utilities, and treatment orders more than double that. In fact, the treatment bidding pipeline was up double digits, and as I've mentioned before, this project pipeline is a strong leading indicator for the longer-term health of the public utility sector. Mark will give some more details on this in a few minutes. The demand in public utilities continues to be robust, and we expect that to manifest in stronger revenue growth later in the year and in 2018 and beyond.
With the increased exposure to this end market that Sensus provides, we're better positioned to benefit from what we believe will be a period of sustained growth. Another pillar of our strategy is to drive growth in emerging markets. This is an area where we see momentum building after a period of softness, importantly, we're very encouraged by the longer-term growth prospects. During the first quarter, orders were up 14% in emerging markets and revenue grew 3%. This is building off the early signs of growth that we saw in the fourth quarter and bolsters our confidence in being able to achieve our objectives for the year and longer term. In China a year ago, we faced very challenging conditions, our team remained focused on our long-term objectives, and now we're realizing the benefits as conditions are beginning to stabilize and our business returns to growth.
Revenue was up 4% in the quarter, momentum is picking up in orders. We're also continuing to increase our product localization, we've expanded our supply chain there. India continues to be a standout, we are growing our team there to take full advantage of the opportunities. Momentum in both revenue and orders continues to grow as the government's commitment to investing in infrastructure supports the longer-term growth thesis. The Middle East continues to be a challenged market, we remain positive on the long-term prospects given the obvious needs there. Water scarcity, infrastructure demand, continued growth in construction, and more. In fact, the project pipeline funnel in the Middle East is strengthening, particularly in the areas of construction and building services. Orders in the quarter were up 9%, we see that momentum continuing.
Shifting gears, another part of our growth strategy that we discussed at Investor Day is our focus on strengthening innovation and technology. One of the ways that we're accelerating our progress in this area is by building a broad-based ecosystem of partners to bring together ideas, capabilities, and new products to help solve our customers' challenges and add value to their operations. We're doing this with a more integrated approach to our own internal R&D efforts by partnering with a wide range of academic and research institutions and by working directly with customers and other partners who can help us bring value-add solutions to the market more quickly. Let me provide a couple of examples. Last week, we announced a new agreement to be the exclusive distributor of Pure Technologies's water applications in key emerging market regions.
We will sell these advanced solutions in the Middle East, India, Singapore, and Malaysia, primarily in the public utility and industrial sectors. Pure Technologies' portfolio of solutions is designed to address several of the more challenging pain points we know our customers are struggling to solve, such as non-revenue water, operational efficiency, and asset utilization. Another example is the agreement we entered into this past quarter with our customer, DC Water, a widely regarded thought leader in the water utility space in the U.S. This agreement outlines specific areas of collaboration on a wide range of research and future innovation initiatives. This includes field-driven pilots that focus on new treatment technologies and increasing the productivity and resilience of their operations. We kicked off the collaboration by delivering their first Flygt Concertor pump for installation at their flagship treatment plant. This serves as an important reference case in North America.
Finally, our Sensus integration is well on track to accelerate our work in the area of smart water infrastructure. As we discussed in Investor Day, we are confident that we will deliver significant revenue synergies by leveraging the systems intelligence capabilities of Sensus to develop new offerings for Xylem's customers. Our teams are making good progress, and we expect to be piloting prototypes of new solutions at customer locations sometime during the summer. To finish up on our first quarter results, let me quickly touch on our ongoing progress in the area of continuous improvement. As I already mentioned, our teams delivered a substantial increase in cost savings in the quarter, which enabled us to fund the investments needed to achieve our longer-term value creation objectives. We are expanding training in various continuous improvement practices, which will further drive a productivity for growth mindset deeper into the organization.
We are well on our way to achieving our full-year goals in this area. Our adjusted EBITDA was up 100 basis points to 16.2%. At the bottom line, we generated adjusted earnings per share of $0.39 in the quarter, an increase of 17% year-over-year, excluding the impact of foreign exchange translation. We delivered solid improvement in free cash flow, which positions us well to deliver another year of free cash flow conversion in excess of 110% of net income. Finally, we are raising our full-year earnings guidance to reflect our updated assumption for foreign exchange impact, which has strengthened recently. We increased our adjusted earnings per share by $0.03 at both ends of the range to $2.23-$2.38 per share. We're off to a good start in 2017.
Our teams have made good progress, and we're encouraged by the momentum that we see building in the marketplace and across our business. This gives us confidence in our ability to deliver on our full-year commitments. With that, I'll now turn it over to Mark for more details on the quarter.
Thanks, Patrick. Let's turn to slide five. I'm very pleased that we got off to a good start in the first quarter, and we've built solid momentum heading into Q2. Overall, revenues were up 26% in the quarter. On a pro forma organic basis, this represents 1% growth, with Sensus contributing 7% and the base Xylem business down 1%. Additionally, foreign exchange reduced revenues by $11 million, or one point. From an organic perspective, the 1% decrease in base Xylem revenues largely reflects a 4% decline in the public utility end market, versus a strong prior year comparison that was driven by timing of project deliveries and favorable weather conditions. Partially offsetting this decline was strong growth in residential, up 14%, and a modest increase in commercial of 2%. Industrial revenues were down 2% overall, roughly in line with our expectations entering the quarter.
Market conditions were soft in our Applied Water business, and last year's results also benefited from a few large equipment shipments in Water Infrastructure. We started to see some positive signs in this end market with improving order rates and revenue trends as we entered the second quarter. Regionally, the organic decline for the quarter occurred in the U.S., which was down 4%. Western Europe performance was flat as expected, and as Patrick mentioned, our momentum in emerging markets continued to build as revenue was a bright spot, up 3% year-over-year. Moving to operational performance, we increased our adjusted EBITDA margins by 100 basis points to 16.2% in the quarter. This increase was primarily driven by the strong operating results of Sensus and the continued ramp-up of productivity savings.
Adjusted operating margin declined 40 basis points to 10.5%, which includes 70 basis points of non-cash amortization related to purchase accounting for the Sensus acquisition. Our teams continued to gain traction in the area of productivity, where we delivered $33 million in cost savings in the quarter, which is up 33% from the prior year. This 310 basis point improvement enabled us to offset inflation and fund strategic investments for growth. Excluding the 70 basis points of dilution from the Sensus intangible asset amortization, our operating margin expanded by 30 basis points. Given the tough prior year comparison we faced this quarter, I'm pleased with our team's performance in delivering earnings per share of $0.39, an increase of 11% year-over-year and 17% excluding foreign exchange translation. Please turn to slide six, I'll provide additional details on our segment performance.
I'll start with our first quarter order activity and backlog position at the end of the quarter. Water Infrastructure recorded orders of $546 million in the quarter, up 3% organically year-over-year. This reflects growth in all applications within the segment and was led by treatment orders, which were up 8%. This performance builds on a positive upward trajectory that we've seen in our pipeline and order activity. However, a majority of the treatment projects require longer lead times and will not ship until 2018 or later. That said, we exited the quarter with total backlog for the segment of $584 million, up 4% organically year-over-year. Of this amount, $262 million is due to ship in the second quarter, also up 4% year-over-year on an organic basis, which gives us good confidence on returning to positive revenue growth in the second quarter.
Water Infrastructure revenue of $496 million represents a 3% year-over-year decline on an organic basis. Foreign exchange was a $7 million headwind. In the U.S., the segment declined 8%, primarily driven by declines in the industrial end market. On a positive note, we're seeing some stabilization in the U.S. oil and gas markets, and for the first time since the fourth quarter of 2014, we saw oil and gas revenues grow year-over-year in the dewatering business, which is an encouraging sign. Our public utility business also declined in the U.S. by 4% as we lapped the 22% growth in last year's first quarter. Further impacting revenue was an interruption at our manufacturing facility in Sweden, which was caused by a vendor supply issue that resulted in some shipping delays. We are addressing these issues but expect some modest impact in the second quarter.
Western Europe decreased 2% overall, primarily driven by the timing of shipments in the U.K. We continue to expect solid mid-single-digit growth in the U.K. for 2017, largely due to the AMP6 public utility investment cycle. Emerging markets results were mixed, but up 2% overall. We had 11% growth in Asia, which was primarily driven by the timing of revenues on several large projects. Growth in China was up mid-single digits. This was largely offset by the ongoing weakness in the Middle East, where the level of government spend for infrastructure continued to be constrained, resulting in a 20% decline in year-over-year segment sales. Operating margin for the segment decreased 160 basis points to 10.5%, driven by lower volumes, unfavorable mix inflation, as well as increased strategic investments for growth. These items were partially offset by cost savings of 380 basis points, driven by our productivity programs.
Please turn to Slide 7. Our Applied Water segment booked orders of $354 million in the quarter, which was up 2% organically. Our book-to-bill ratio was 1.06 in the quarter, which is in line with our historical performance. We exited the quarter with backlog of $178 million, which is down 7% organically compared to last year. However, of this amount, $108 million is due to ship in the second quarter of 2017, up approximately 6% on an organic basis, providing another proof point for our confidence in achieving year-over-year revenue growth in the second quarter. Revenue for Applied Water was $333 million, up 2% organically versus the prior year quarter. In Europe, revenue increased 6%, with particularly strong growth in Germany, Italy, and the U.K., where our recent investment in sales capabilities and channels continues to pay off. Continued traction with new products also bolstered performance.
Emerging markets revenue grew 4%, reflecting growth in Asia and, to a lesser extent, Eastern Europe, partially offset by weakness in Latin America and the Middle East. In the U.S., segment revenue was down 1%. This decline was primarily driven by the segment's industrial vertical, which declined 8% from continued weakness in its oil and gas business, soft general industrial applications, and a challenging year-over-year comp in revenues from fire pump projects. Largely offsetting the industrial decline was 15% growth in the residential vertical, which was largely driven by the timing of promotions as well as modest share gains. Our U.S. commercial and building services business also grew 1% in the quarter. Segment operating margin in the quarter increased 90 basis points to 13.5% year-over-year. Strong productivity drove a 390 basis point margin improvement, which more than offset 180 basis points of cost inflation, unfavorable mix, and other minor headwinds.
Now let's turn to Slide 8 to discuss the performance of Sensus. As a reminder, these first quarter results reflect only our Sensus and Visenti businesses. When we report our Q2 results, we'll report the new segment that we announced at our Investor Day, which is a combination of the Sensus, Visenti, and Xylem Analytics businesses. We will provide restated historical segment financial information in advance of our second quarter earnings call. Revenue for Sensus was $242 million, up 7% on a pro forma organic basis versus 2016. In the U.S., revenue increased 9%, with growth primarily attributable to the deployment of several large electric projects. Further driving the strong performance was demand for new products, including the Stratus meter for our electric customers and the iPERL water meter. Our emerging markets business grew 20%, predominantly driven by smart water applications in the Middle East.
Western Europe was down 5%, which primarily reflects the lapping of significant service fee revenues related to the deployment of the Thames Water contract in 2016. As a reminder, the timing of project deployments in the Sensus business can create some lumpiness in quarterly growth rates. While we saw growth at the high end of our guidance range in Q1, we expect that to temper in Q2, which we'll cover in our outlook discussion. Adjusted EBITDA margins increased 50 basis points to 19.8%. Margin expansion was driven by higher volumes, improved mix, and productivity savings, partially offset by inflation. Adjusted segment operating margin in the quarter decreased 160 basis points to 10.7% year-over-year. This decline is directly attributable to the non-cash impact of incremental purchase accounting, depreciation, and amortization. Excluding these non-cash items, margins expanded by 170 basis points.
Now let's turn to Slide 9 to discuss cash flows and the company's financial position. We closed the quarter with a cash balance of $287 million. As you may recall, the first quarter is our seasonally weakest period for cash flow. However, the $26 million of free cash flow in the quarter increased significantly from the prior year and was driven largely by the addition of Sensus. Free cash flow conversion was 39% in the quarter, compared to 6% conversion last year. During the first quarter, we invested $43 million in capital expenditures and also returned $33 million to our shareholders through dividends. In February, we announced a 16% increase to our dividend payout, our fifth consecutive annual increase. While working capital increased overall, the improvement as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects the addition of Sensus versus 2016.
As a reminder, Sensus positively impacts our working capital performance with their very efficient working capital model. We remain committed to maintaining our investment-grade credit rating, which will require that we primarily focus our capital deployment on debt repayment over the next 12 months. Please turn to Slide 10, Patrick will cover the update to our 2017 outlook.
Thanks, Mark. As I said earlier, we're off to a solid start in 2017 and are well-positioned to deliver on our financial targets. With the exception of our foreign currency assumptions, our full-year 2017 guidance has not changed. On a pro forma basis, we continue to anticipate organic growth of 2%-4%, which includes organic growth from the base Xylem businesses of 1%-3% and Sensus organic growth of 6%-7%. As we drive our continuous improvement work deeper into the organization, we continue to accelerate our lean and global procurement initiatives and expect to realize $130 million in savings for the full year, a 10% year-over-year increase. With our Q1 results in this area, we're on pace to meet that target.
Our adjusted operating margin is expected to grow in the range of 20 to 70 basis points, excluding roughly 60 basis points of margin dilution from acquisitions. As I mentioned earlier, we've updated our foreign currency translation assumptions. As a result, we now anticipate generating earnings per share of $2.23 to $2.38, which excludes integration, restructuring, and realignment of cost of about $30 million. Excluding foreign exchange impact, EPS growth is expected to be in the range of 12%-20%. Finally, as we've outlined previously, we expect to deliver free cash flow conversion of at least 110% this year. This contemplates expected capital expenditures in the range of $190 million-$200 million. Please turn to slide 11 and I'll walk you through our end market assumptions.
Please note that our commentary and growth estimates on this slide reflect pro forma organic revenue from 2016 for Xylem and now includes the impact of Sensus. Public utility constitutes 47% of total pro forma 2016 revenue. In 2017, we expect pro forma organic revenue to grow in the low to mid-single digit range. Sensus is expected to generate organic growth of 6%-7%. We anticipate 2017 organic growth of the base Xylem business to moderate after a very strong 2016, but to continue growing up low single digits. As mentioned previously, we face a challenging comparison in the U.S. market, given the exceptional 17% growth we delivered in 2016. As a result, we believe growth in this region will be in the low to mid-single digit range. We expect large project activities to drive mid to high single-digit growth in the emerging markets, especially in China and India.
In Europe, we anticipate low double-digit growth. Our industrial end market represents 37% of pro forma revenue. In 2017, we continue to expect that full-year organic revenue will be flat to up low single digits. The soft market conditions in general industrial that occurred in the U.S. last year are continuing into 2017, though we do expect modest growth over the second half of the year. We expect emerging market performance to be mixed, with some strength in China and Latin America offset by continued weakness in the Middle East. Moving to commercial, which represents 11% of pro forma revenue, we expect organic growth in the low single-digit range in 2017 with a solid U.S. market and a tough prior year comparison in Europe. Residential revenues reflect 5% of pro forma revenue, and we expect 2017 organic growth in the low to mid-single digit range.
In the U.S., we continue to expect a flat to low single-digit growth rate despite a stronger-than-expected first quarter. The European market looks to be modestly stronger as residential building permits increase. Now please turn to slide 12, and Mark will walk you through more details on the outlook.
Consistent with what we disclosed last quarter, we're providing the seasonal profile of our business as well as highlights of our 2017 planning assumptions. For the second quarter, we expect modest improvement in both the public utility and industrial markets sequentially, with both returning to low single-digit growth. We continue to expect commercial to grow in the low single-digit range for the quarter, and we anticipate moderating growth in residential, up low single digits, reflecting the impact of the first quarter promotions. All in, we anticipate this will result in organic revenue growth in the range of 1%-2% for the base Xylem business. We also expect foreign exchange translation to unfavorably impact revenue by $20 million. Acquisitions are expected to add approximately $230 million-$240 million, with Sensus growing organically at 1%-2% in the second quarter.
Sensus has a tough comparison to the prior year primarily due to the timing of distributor stocking of iPERL meters in North America last year, as well as higher prior year revenues from rollouts for two large U.K. contracts. One other note regarding Sensus. One of its primary battery suppliers had a significant incident at its manufacturing facility, which has shut down production. We are making arrangements with other existing and alternate suppliers to minimize any potential disruptions in serving our customers. Given our current inventory of batteries, which substantially covers our needs through the second quarter, and the initial commitments received from additional suppliers, we currently do not anticipate any material disruption in our ability to fulfill customer orders. Our teams are on top of this issue, and we're tracking the progress very closely.
As for our second quarter segment operating margin, we expect margins to be up 50-70 basis points, excluding the 70 basis point reduction due to the non-cash amortization of Sensus purchase accounting. Finally, please note that the summary of our FX assumptions on this slide, which includes our updated EUR guidance assumption at 107 from 104, which puts us in line with the year-to-date average actual rate of 107. Aside from our currency assumptions, all other assumptions remain unchanged from our previous guidance. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Patrick for some closing comments.
Thanks, Mark. A good start to the year, and we're encouraged by the growing momentum we see in our businesses. The market fundamentals are solid, and our teams are executing well. We remain focused on our long-term strategy while continuing to deliver on our full-year commitments. With that now, operator, let's open it up for questions.
The floor is now open for questions. At this time, if you have a question or comment, please press star one on your touch-tone phone. If at any point your question is answered, you may remove yourself from the queue by pressing the pound key. Again, we do ask that while you pose your question, that you please pick up your handset to provide optimal sound quality. Thank you. Your first question comes from Deane Dray of RBC Capital Markets.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone.
Good morning, Deane.
Good morning.
Hey. Would like to address first some of the issues going on in municipal, both U.S. and Europe. Maybe we can start with, did you see any of the project delays or some hesitation on project releases in both U.S. and Europe? Then on the second quarter outlook, you are facing another tough comp, especially in the U.S. Is the expectation that you would post another negative organic in U.S. muni for the second quarter?
Thanks, Deane. This is Patrick. Let me take the second question first. Our outlook for Q2 is to be flat to up low single digits. That's a global number. That does reflect some flatness to up low single digits in the U.S. as well as in Europe. We don't see it presenting the same kind of comp that it did for us in Q1. In terms of what we're seeing in both the U.S. and Europe, let me start first with Europe. Really the only timing issue that we saw there was really in the U.K., in the AMP cycle. There was nothing for us to be alarmed about. It really was just timing of shipments that hit us there in the first quarter.
We're still expecting that to be mid-single digits for the full year as we'd originally guided to. In the U.S., again, nothing noticeable that we've seen in terms of any delay in projects being awarded or in the day-to-day activity. It really is simply the fact that we had such a tough comp versus last year, both due to, again, heavy spending activity, timing of projects, but also you'll recall we had unusually warm weather last year that drove some higher shipments and install in the quarter.
My follow-up on given all the items going on at Xylem today, the Sensus acquisition closing, the analyst meeting, raising all your long-term targets. We got the most questions and the most excitement around this announcement with Pure Technologies. Maybe you just spend a moment there. How did this partnership come together? Specifically about the go to market, how will you coordinate your technologies? Is there any interoperability within your technologies and any plans to expand beyond these initial emerging markets?
Sure. Well, thanks, Deane. We're certainly very excited about the opportunity to partner with Jack Elliott and the team there at Pure. We've known them for a long time. Obviously, we see them in the marketplace. We've been impressed by what their capabilities are. We've been talking about this for a little while. They've got some capability gaps in very specific emerging markets, most notably Middle East, India, Singapore, and Malaysia, which is really where we're starting because we've got a strong set of channels to market there. I think this really makes sense now in terms of complementary technologies now that we've got both Sensus and Visenti in the portfolio, and we put those businesses together. We're going to be exploring to see what other opportunities there are in terms of the complementary nature of those products in those markets. Again, right now it's really exploratory.
It's really focusing on a few key markets here, and helping customers again with those very specific pain points that we laid out.
How about from the technology standpoint?
Remains to be seen. I think there clearly is some interoperability there that we'll explore over time, but still very much in the early stages here.
Understood. Thank you.
Thank you, Deane.
Your next question comes from Scott Davis of Barclays.
Hi. Good morning, guys.
Good morning, Scott.
I feel like I need to ask about this battery problem, because you mentioned at the end, but sometimes when we've seen supply chain challenges, they tend to linger and cause problems that are beyond sometimes what people anticipate. You commented that you've got inventory and such for 2Q, and you don't see any customer disruptions. How about the cost side of it, though? Are there concerns that your cost of procurement are going to go up meaningfully in the back half of the year? How long do you think this battery problem, or how long does your supplier think this is going to linger or take?
Sure. No, it's a great question, Scott. A couple of pieces there. One would be, so we have a qualified backup supplier already, and we were in the late stages of qualifying a third source already. Obviously the teams are very much focused on accelerating that third qualification. We think the combination of getting them both up and running, as well as the inventory that both we and our current supplier have on hand, that certainly will help us bridge any of the supply chain gaps that we've got there. To your point around the cost side, very minimal impact from a cost standpoint. There'll probably be a little bit of maybe freight expedition in some areas. The suppliers that we've got there have been very good with us in terms of remaining true to previous negotiations, et cetera.
Obviously, don't want to get into many more specifics other than that, just given the competitive dynamics and negotiations.
Yeah. No, fair enough. Just as a follow-up, since there's 10,000 water utilities out there, and we can't talk to very many of them, quite frankly, it's tough for us to get a view. Do you get a sense from your customers at all that they're thinking about projects in terms of waiting until there's a federal infrastructure bill, that waiting to see if money's available and potentially kind of delaying things until you get into 2018?
We don't see a common thread there, Scott, of people necessarily slowing down. If anything, we've seen quoting activity up double digits again and our bidding pipeline up very strong. Obviously your question is more around when those things come to market. I think certainly maybe in some of the smaller utilities where they're reliant on state funding and maybe to a lesser extent the possibility of federal funding, it's less about the money that may come to water projects, and it's more about the money that may come to other infrastructure investments that takes a little bit of pressure off of their budgets and therefore easier for them to go ahead and move forward with the water spend. We're really not seeing a lot of that. That's really not what's impacting us here going through Q1 and into Q2.
It really is simply the very tough year-over-year comp of last year.
Yeah. In fact, our pipeline for treatment orders is up 16%.
Yeah. No, I'm just trying to reconcile that and just thinking in terms of how they think about things like this. Anyways, that was very helpful. Thank you, and good luck to you guys.
Thanks, Scott. I appreciate it.
Your next question comes from Nathan Jones of Stifel.
Morning, everyone.
Good morning.
Good morning.
If we could go to the margins in Water Infrastructure. You were down, I think, 160 basis points there, which is mid 50s detrimental, but you did call out some additional strategic investments there. Can you kind of quantify what the level of those strategic investments were and how long we should expect those to continue?
Yeah. Nate, it's Mark. In terms of the investment specifically, it was around $5 million, and a lot of that was focused on continuing to add commercial capabilities, particularly in our emerging markets. Some product localization as well. That was the bulk of it. There was also a little bit of investment in Europe as well, but that was roughly 100 basis points. The big impact on the margin profile was really a function of volume and mix. We had a very rich mix of projects last year, particularly in our dewatering business, one of our highest margin businesses, and also had a lot of aftermarket business as well with the warm weather. It was more of a volume and mix story there.
Yeah. Nate, as you can appreciate, any time, especially Q1 being one of our slowest quarters of the year, and given the fixed costs that we've got, especially on the Water Infrastructure side, any kind of volume softness there magnifies at least within the quarter. We're very confident about getting to our margin expansion goals for the full year. As Mark mentioned in his prepared comments, we had some self-inflicted issues from a supplier in our Emmaboda factory, that revenue is very rich in terms of margin, and we'll get that back here partially in Q2 and certainly in Q3.
How long should we expect the investments to continue?
I'd say modest here through the rest of this year. The only investments we'll be making for the most part would be, we'll continue to invest in some emerging market sales expansion, a bit more on the product localization, given that we do see a full-on recovery in some of the emerging markets. We've got a little bit that we'll be investing in the integration of Sensus in terms of going after some of the revenue synergies that we talked about. There'll be a little bit of an uptick in R&D, all of that's been reflected in our guide for the year. There's no change in outlook.
Okay, my follow-up. You've talked about treatment orders being the leading indicator. We've seen the treatment pipeline be pretty strong for probably a year and a half now. Can you talk a little bit about if you're seeing some of the transport and test stuff that's supposed to come behind that strengthening in the pipeline as a result of those treatment orders leading that kind of revenue?
Yeah. We would normally see about probably an 18-month, kind of 12-18 months kind of lag between orders actually being received on a treatment. Our comments here are as much about bidding pipeline being up. Obviously, we did see good treatment orders in the quarter at 8% growth. We do think that bodes well for the test and transport piece of the business here. I think we're seeing some of that now in terms of our orders lift here in this last quarter. That would really, I think, buoy us even more strongly for the latter part of this year into 2018.
Okay, that's kind of the timeframe that we should think about those orders ramping up would be mid to late this year?
That's correct. I'd say late this year into early 2018.
You might recall, Nate, we had a bit of a hole in our orders in the first half of last year. First and second quarter, we were down organically 2% and 4% respectively, that momentum has been building up in Q3 and Q4 of last year, Q1. Some of that is treatment, which does, as Patrick said, have a little bit longer incubation period in terms of actually manifesting itself in revenues.
That's very helpful. Thanks, guys.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Jim Giannakouros of Oppenheimer.
Hey, good morning, Patrick, Mark.
Good morning, Jim.
Hey, Jim.
Question on Sensus revenue increased 9%, I think you said in the U.S., those large electric projects. I'm sorry, they weren't on my radar, and I apologize if you had telegraphed it before. Does that mix, I guess, well, first that aspect, is that set up for tough comps or is there acceleration elsewhere in Sensus that 6% or 7% growth in 2018 is in the stretch? I guess any and all comments on mix, both organic growth contribution by component within Sensus and any impacts to margins we should be aware of.
Sure. We'll take into pieces here. In terms of does it set up for a tough comp, let me start first with even the rest of this year. You'll recall that we've got a rather easy comp in Q4, because we had lower growth last year because of some delays in Saudi on their shipments due to lesser credit, et cetera. That sets up for an easier comp in Q4 that gives us confidence of getting to that 6%-7% growth. We remain confident about the growth outlook over the planning period of that 6%-7%. We've got some large project deployments that are front-end loaded as we head into 2018. That will help us with this comp in Q1 next year, but also through the entirety of 2018.
In terms of margin mix, I'll share a few comments here, and Mark can certainly chime in. Not an unusually large mix issue organically within Sensus in terms of margins between, say, the water deployment versus electrical or gas. You get a little bit higher margin on the water side than electric, but given the fact that we had a large deployment here, that also tends to be favorable from a margin standpoint. It kind of blends out to where there was no noticeable shift from my perspective.
You look at their margins quarter-over-quarter, they don't move that much. They're fairly consistent because you might have a richer mix in terms of some of the roll-outs of large projects, but you can also have some mix coming from software-as-a-service too, depending on the timing of that. While the volume can be a little bit lumpy, the gross margins are fairly consistent.
Got it. Thank you. I guess just sticking on Sensus or I guess the projected revenue synergies with Water Infrastructure, how should we be thinking about, and I apologize if I should know this, how should we be thinking about bucketing the growth between Sensus and Water Infrastructure? Is it pretty balanced over the next few years, or is there greater potential in one or the other?
I'd say it remains to be seen. We haven't given that level of specificity yet. We're obviously still working through some of the prototypes. It'll be a combination of the two. The way to think about that is where we are getting synergies by connecting our equipment in the field on the wastewater side, those revenues would flow through the Water Infrastructure. Where we are winning any of these large international deals by way of Xylem helping pull them through, that obviously will impact Sensus and Xylem Analytics as we go forward. That's the way to think about it. We haven't yet split the dollar amounts that we teed up at Investor Day amongst those buckets. We'll have certainly more to share on that as we get later into the year and we get some of these prototype deployments out in the field.
Great. Thank you, guys.
Thank you.
Thanks, Jim.
Your next question comes from Chip Moore of Canaccord Genuity.
Good morning. Thanks.
Morning, Chip.
Morning. Obviously not a big part of the portfolio, oil and gas markets. Maybe we could talk a little bit more. Nice to see dewatering turning positive. What sort of trends, I guess, you've seen into Q2, and has your outlook changed at all?
Yeah. On dewatering, while as I had mentioned, it was nice to see growth for the first time since the fourth quarter 2014. It was pretty modest. Okay? The trend line has definitely changed. We're seeing some of that growth in pockets in some areas of fracking. Certainly, Permian Basin continues to be a pretty hot area. While the inflection point is good, we don't see any significant takeoff in that part of our business. Although the comps get a heck of a lot easier in the next several quarters.
Yeah. Just to parse it a little bit more as well. You'll recall probably, I think it was last quarter's call or even at Investor Day, we talked about the biggest challenge that we faced in the dewatering sector from an oil and gas and mining standpoint was more on our indirect channel side with our distributors. We've seen flat to a little bit of growth in our direct channel for the last quarter or so, but it was being more than offset by double-digit declines continuing in the indirect channel. The good news was the indirect channel flat-lined for the first time in Q1. That's really what helped us get to a net positive growth on that piece of the dewatering business.
Great. Thank you guys.
Thank you.
Thanks, Chip.
Your next question comes from Joe Giordano of Cowen.
Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question.
Hey, Joe.
Morning, Joe.
Unfortunately, I had to jump on a little late, apologies if I go over something that was already discussed. I wanted to talk a little bit about the industrial outlook here. Flat to up low single digits. I know you have some oil and gas and mining and stuff in there that's not your general industrial, can you scale that versus what we've seen earnings season so far seems to be an acceleration there. That flat to low seems pretty modest versus what we've heard so far the last couple of weeks. What are your thoughts there? Does that feel more conservative to you than the other outlooks for the rest of the end markets?
Joe, this is Patrick. It's hard to call at this point. That business is rather short cycle for us. It's largely a replacement business through our Applied Water segment. Because it is general light industrial being the lion's share of that, at the end of the day, we've always said that it is very much a GDP at best kind of business. Typically grows around that kind of 2%-3%. We've baked in the flat to low single digits simply because of what we saw in Q1, and therefore, what would one have to believe for the next three quarters to get to a solid low single digit. There are some early positive indicators that we're seeing, but it is still early.
This is, again, a light industrial business, it's not going to be nearly as volatile and ramp as you see in some of our peer companies.
Yeah, no, that's fair. Maybe just a higher-level question, maybe this is too high level for this call. When I think about your portfolio now moving to Sensus, stuff with Pure, how do you see Xylem becoming positioned over the next, call it, over your time as CEO there as more of a smart city provider and fitting that niche more than a traditional equipment provider. How do you see the business evolving into that sort of discussion?
That's a great question, Joseph Giordano. I think that the way I would describe it is we believe strongly that there is clearly a number of large unmet needs from helping our customers both in water, but also across other elements of the utility space provide smart solutions to them. We think we're building a very nice suite of offerings here and capabilities, including the data analytics side. There are still gaps in those offerings that we will either get through acquisition or through commercial partnerships like we announced with Pure Technologies. There are more to come on those types of partnerships that are out there.
I would want to make sure, though, that no one ever be confused around the fact that I think it's critically important that even though we are looking to build that kind of smart solution, we are not going to move away from our OEM heritage as a business because it's my experience that you really need to have the subject matter expertise around the equipment itself as well, so you can really bring a holistic solution to the customer as opposed to only becoming a software-as-a-service or data analytics kind of provider. We'll continue to invest in making our equipment smart and much as other industrial companies are doing. It'll be a mix of those two. Then lastly, I would say it's not limited to the smart infrastructure around systems intelligence. We've talked before about advanced industrial treatment.
We've talked about industrial services being a bigger part of our offering. There's more to it than just the smart infrastructure element, but that is certainly what mine and our primary focus is right now in terms of where we invest our money, both organically and inorganically.
Great. That's a good answer. Thanks very much, Patrick.
Thank you, Joe.
Your next question comes from Brian Lee of Goldman Sachs.
Hey, guys. Thanks for squeezing me in here.
Sure. Good morning.
Good morning. Given the year-over-year decline is due to mostly tougher comps, particularly in the U.S., just wondering if you can maybe comment a bit on how much of the bookings pickup you're seeing is in the U.S. versus elsewhere. What trends you can talk to geographically on bookings specifically.
I would say a lot of the booking momentum has been in emerging markets. We are also seeing solid order growth in the U.S. as well. Low single digits. Good momentum. I'd say the biggest source of order growth has been in emerging markets. A nice upward tick in the U.S. as well.
Okay, great. That's helpful. I'll just do a quick housekeeping one if I can. The Sweden manufacturing issue you mentioned, could you quantify if there was any impact in the quarter? I think you had mentioned there may be a little bit of residual impact into Q2, maybe what exactly that impact was. What the remediation steps are from here. Thank you.
Yeah. Brian, it was roughly $3 million in the first quarter on the revenue side. We're managing it as best we can. We think it's going to continue into the second quarter. We'll get it nailed down. Probably a similar impact in Q2 as well from a revenue perspective.
All right.
The good news is here, we're not losing business, so the business comes back. It's simply a matter of the timing of the shipment deliveries.
Okay. Super helpful. Thank you.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from John Walsh of Vertical Research.
Hi, good morning.
Good morning.
Hey, John.
Questions around the margin. Clearly, you've been able to more than offset cost inflation pressures with cost reductions. Given what we're seeing in raws, can you talk about your ability to capture price in this environment?
Sure. Yeah. This is Patrick. I'll start here, and then Mark can chime in. We're very much focused on marrying up the views on cost inflation with pricing in the market. Our supply chain teams and our commercial teams are joined at the hip kind of country by country, understanding what the dynamics are. Obviously, in those businesses where we have a share leadership position, we're being very disciplined in terms of being the price lead and preserving that. That's much more the case in elements of Water Infrastructure, where we are seeing a more favorable supply-demand dynamic coupled with inflation. A little bit easier. Never easy to get price pass-through, but a little easier there. A little tougher in Applied Water, just given some of the competitive dynamics there and a little bit more softness in markets of industrial, but also the resi business.
You saw where we did some promotions there to drive share gain in that part of the business, albeit small. It's a mixed bag, but it's something we're very much on top of. I would say, again, mixed results up to this point.
Yeah. We're making sure the teams get out ahead of it. We saw a modest bump on the raws when you look at it in Q1 compared to last year. 10 to 20 basis points in our two operating segments, Water Infrastructure and AWS. The first step is awareness, and we're making sure that the commercial teams are getting good information from global sourcing so they understand, in terms of specific product lines, what that impact in terms of the creep in raws is, so they can be more effective in the marketplace.
I would just maybe wrap that up with the fact that when I look back over the last 3 years, certainly since I've been here, I talk to the leaders in the business that have been around, I would say historically, they've been very effective and very disciplined at understanding the inflationary dynamics and driving price discipline where they need to. What's simply gotten better, I think, is both our focus on cost out productivity, but also having enhanced and developed our procurement capabilities through Tony Milando and that team. We've got a lot more awareness now earlier on, I think, than we would have had historically.
Got you. Thank you. Just a quick one on Sensus. Obviously, directionally, you helped us with the comps on the back half, but wanted to know if you can provide the explicit organic growth comps for Sensus in Q3, Q4. In terms of the margin, should we build off of the 10.7% in Q1, or you called that there was the benefit of that large project. Does this maybe, from an operating margin perspective, take a sequential step down and then build in the back half of the year for Sensus?
Yeah, let me take that one. What we've provided to date is we've provided the full year Margin profile for Sensus. We don't see that changing. We still expect EBITDA margin to be in that 19.5% range and adjusted operating margin for the full year to be in the low 10s. As I said, while there's modest movement from quarter to quarter, it's not all that significant. Although I would say, given some of the mix that we had in the first quarter, it's probably a little bit higher margin mix than what we'll see throughout the remainder of the year.
Got you. Thank you. Very helpful. Yep. Thanks, man. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Robert Barry at Susquehanna.
Hey, guys. Thanks for fitting me in. Good morning.
Sure. Good morning. Good morning, Robert.
Just a couple of things. We've covered a lot of ground. I think last quarter you talked about core growth on the legacy business of flat to low single. Is that refined slightly better to one to two now? Or is it-
I think we-
No change?
Which periods, Robert?
In 2Q.
Full year?
I think it was flat to low. 2Q.
That's right. Yeah. Yeah. For Q2, Robert, yeah, it's up about a point from where we had guided before, and that's really just baking in the momentum that we saw coming out of Q1. When we talk about what our shippable backlog within the quarter looks like, would support that number as well.
Got you. Any change to the back half? I think it was 3%-4% in 3Q and a little better than that in 4Q.
Yeah, I'd say it's in line with what we said before. Obviously, we'll take a look at that again as we get through Q2 and see what the momentum is. Right now, we've held the back half as where we had it before.
Okay. Just conservatism or anything you are seeing in the backlog?
No, I think it is just still early and, it is again, we are still a relatively short cycle business other than the visibility we have on treatment. We are just trying to be prudent here.
Fair enough. If we could just chat quickly about this promotional activity in resi, up 14%, added almost a point of growth to the quarter. Just are you getting more aggressive there? Do not usually see that kind of growth in the resi looking back.
Yeah. It is timing. Some of it is terms. It is not all price. We are trying to be aggressive commercially without giving away the store on price. Yeah. I would say, Robert, to me, there has been a lot going on in that part of the market as you know, as you follow other companies. I think just keeping our teams focused on, let us win share. Let us leverage things beyond price to do so. There is always some timing issue. It is a relatively small piece of our business, so even a little bit of absolute dollar impact there can swing it pretty significantly either direction. I wouldn't get too focused in on the 14% number in one quarter. I think what we are encouraged by was the fact that it was a good growth and we saw good backlog build in that business.
Hopefully it helps us normalize for the year. We've had a couple of lumpy years, the last couple of years due to weather and other things. We hope we're smoothing things out now.
Yep, fair enough. Yeah, I was more focusing on the promotional activity and just whether there was any change in the pricing.
No. No. It's not a margin or pricing thing. It was really more on the payment terms.
Got you. Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Your final question comes from Jose Garza of Gabelli.
Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for fitting me in.
Good morning, Jose. Good morning.
I guess going back to that, one of your competitors purchased some distribution recently in the U.S. on the groundwater side. Just wondering if you could give us your thoughts on any kind of impacts that you foresee and how you're thinking about that business in the longer term, Patrick.
Sure. No, thanks, Jose. We were aware of this move coming for quite some time, we had been already building in backup plans in terms of what the future would be for us. Just to put it in perspective, the impact on us on this one bit of disruption, it's less than 1% of our total Applied Water segment revenue. Even less than that for the total company. We've already got backup plans in place. We're working with Franklin on this. We have some other alternatives that we're working through as well, we don't expect any disruption at all on that part of our business. In terms of other questions that we've gotten in the past have really been around what's our strategy between direct and indirect, does this move kind of change that?
I think it's important that I state here that we are absolutely committed to support our channel partner relationships. They're valuable. They've got long-term relationship with us. They've got a lot of reach in the marketplace, we place a value on that, at least certainly within that part of the business. We think making sure that we've got a broad and diverse network, both direct and indirect, is our best way to serve the market, both from a access standpoint, but also from a cost to serve standpoint.
Okay, that's very helpful. Appreciate it.
Okay. Thank you.
This concludes our question and answer session of today's conference. I will now turn the floor back over to Mr. Patrick Decker for any additional or closing remarks.
Great. Well, thank you. Thanks, everybody, for your continued interest in joining the call. A lot of good questions. Look forward to seeing you guys on the road. In the meantime, we'll catch up with you on our next earnings call. Thank you all very much.
Thank you. This does conclude today's Xylem First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call.