Anthropic loses court ruling, allowing Pentagon blacklist to proceed
The Department of Defense is allowed to blacklist Anthropic, a federal court ruled, in a stinging loss for the AI giant. If the ruling holds, Anthropic would be considered a national security risk, which may jeopardize government contracts and millions of dollars in revenue (1, 2).
- The long-running dispute began in February 2026, when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth demanded that Anthropic permit unrestricted use of AI models by the Pentagon (2).
- Critics charged that such permission would allow the DoD to pursue wide-ranging surveillance of U.S. citizens and develop fully autonomous weapons (3).
- Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refused to comply with the demand. In response, President Trump ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's products, and Hegseth designated the firm a supply-chain risk — meaning that military contractors and suppliers cannot work with Anthropic (2, 4).
- Such a designation had previously only been used to target foreign companies that the government believed threatened national security. Hegseth's order represented the first time it had been used against a domestic, U.S.-headquartered company (4).
- In March, Anthropic filed two lawsuits against the government seeking to overturn the supply-chain risk designation — one in California, where the company is based, and one in D.C. (2).
- It won the former challenge last month, with a judge ruling that the government's retaliation against Anthropic was illegal (5).
- However, the D.C. lawsuit resulted in defeat. The D.C. Court of Appeals claimed that the DoD "had ample support for its conclusion" that using Anthropic could risk national security (1).
- As such, Anthropic remains banned from working with the Pentagon or any Pentagon contractor (4).
- The court also threw cold water on Anthropic's assertion that its due-process and First Amendment rights were violated, labeling its claims "without merit" (1).
- The court split 2–1 in the ruling. Judges Neomi Rao and Gregory G. Katsas — both appointees of President Trump — formed the majority. Judge Karen L. Henderson, a George H. W. Bush appointee, dissented (1, 4).
- Anthropic may appeal the decision or ask for a review by the full panel of 11 D.C. appeals court judges (4).
Sources & Further Reading
- Anthropic v. United States Department of War. D.C. Court of Appeals. September 25, 2026.
- "A Timeline of the Anthropic-Pentagon Dispute." Tech Policy Press. February 25, 2026.
- "Anthropic boss rejects Pentagon demand to drop AI safeguards." BBC. February 27, 2026.
- "Trump Administration’s Blacklisting of Anthropic Was Legal, Judges Rule." New York Times. September 25, 2026.
- "Trump Administration’s Blacklisting of Anthropic Was Illegal, Judge Rules." New York Times. August 27, 2026.