Hello, welcome to the Randstad third quarter results 2021. My name is Josh, and I will be your coordinator for today's event. Please note that this conference is being recorded, and for the duration of the call, your lines will be on listen-only. However, you will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of the call. This can be done by pressing star one on your telephone keypad to register your question. If you require any assistance at any point, please press star zero and you will be connected to an operator. I'll now hand you over to your host, Jacques van den Broek, to begin today's conference. Thank you.
Yeah. Good morning. Thank you, Josh. Good to talk to you all. We're here with Henry and Bisera, Akshay from Investor Relations. Yeah, we sent you two press releases this morning, the regular one that you recognized and the other one on me stepping down as of end of March next year. Lots of questions, of course, why now? Well, as a CEO, I think you've got two responsibilities. The first one is to manage the company for the long term, to create a winning strategy that will last for many years to come. I've always seen that as my foremost duty. I think we are in that phase. We have a strategy that works. It's never finished, always goes slower than you expect. Definitely with my team, with the whole Executive Board, Supervisory Board, very happy with where we are and looking into the future optimistically.
The second one is to then time your going away at a moment when the company, on the more shorter term, is also in good shape. Of course, last year was a different picture, certainly in the midst of the year. As you've seen, we bounced back quickly and we bounced back better than expected and better than market. The company's in great shape, and that is then the moment for me to say, okay, I got a great successor in Sander van 't Noordende. Sander has been with our supervisory board for six months now, so he's had the opportunity to look around the company. He has background with Accenture, which has a lot of aspects of where we are going as a company, predominantly in the solution space.
Take the time to break him in in first quarter of next year, and then, yeah, we'll see. That was the first press release. The second press release is on our numbers. Well, we are very happy to report those numbers, because we're very happy with the performance of our people this year. Market-leading growth. 20.7, almost 21% growth to 2020, but 5% more to 2019. Henry will talk a little bit more about that, but very good. Also surprisingly, honestly, is perm. I'm very happy that we invested timely in perm. I would have expected, based on my knowledge, that perm would be later, but we saw very early in the year already in our Randstad Sourceright and our American RPO business, very, very strong demand. Fortunately, we have the people to handle that demand, and you could see that.
After the financial crisis in 2009, we bounced back later in perm. If you look at the numbers of perm players are actually even better than they are, and 15% ahead of 2019, where this was just 1% in the second quarter. Good. Outperformance in almost every market, also again, in the important markets in the U.S. and France, but also in the Netherlands. Very happy with that. I'm on the road again, visiting clients. That's good because that's what I like most. Yeah, we're talking to them because the mind shift they need to make is from going with an abundance of people in the midst of COVID to all the trends on scarcity which are back. We know that. Our strategy is based on that. We're going to talk more about it at the Capital Markets Day.
Less and less the regular recruitment model will hold true, that you have a job opening, job posting, then people react, you make a selection. That's why we are creating this big database so that we can go in and with our clients discuss what's still available and how they need to change their demand, maybe train, maybe put business elsewhere, maybe get two part-timers, maybe get all the people, whatever. We're very well positioned. As I said this morning in an interview, we are part of the solution of what is happening in the labor market today. We also made an acquisition, Cella. This adds to our IT portfolio and very welcome that they are. It's going to be already in our numbers in Q4.
Let me take you to slide seven. We mentioned that in Q2, we were already above 2019, but you see the trend increasing. September was 6% higher than 2019, a light improvement throughout the quarter. The trend in early October, mind you, these are two weeks, of course, but still, we see a good trend, yeah, hopefully for the rest of the year. Although, of course, you do see COVID flaring up now and again. It's still a volatile market as always, but yeah, we're optimistic for the remainder of the year. Let's go to the countries. North America, very strong outperformance again, 17% growth, up 5% versus 2019. Actually, all our markets are above 2019. Exception is France, but also improving towards 2019. Perm, a record with 30% versus 2019.
Again, you see in this American market that there's a lot of demand. U.S. Profs grew 11%, but they have much tougher comparison because, of course, that business dropped way less than our staffing business did, so a great performance there. Our Canadian business, 28%, 12% above 2019. Again, our Canadian business, very strong run business with an experienced team. EBITDA margin up 40 basis points, so good stuff there. You're going to be asking about wage inflation. We do see wage inflation in the U.S. Overall, that's good for us, and we can pass on higher bill rates well in that market. Our French business, 12% year-on-year growth. 3% still below 2019, was 6% in the second quarter, but very positive momentum. 5%, sorry. Positive momentum. Looking at employees working in France, we do see a steady improvement also in this quarter.
Yes, supply chain issues. I mentioned that also in the second quarter, automotive related, chip related. We do see that. We move to other sectors. Effectively, this might be, again, hopefully short-lived and maybe a promise for 2022. In markets like Spain, Belgium, France, Germany, we do see that. As we've shown also last year, we pivot towards other sectors where there's demand. Again, on our French business, Professionals, very strong, 13% growth. Also our Ausy business, tough time last year. Of course, many sectors down, they're doing a great job. As you know, we put in a new global management team, very happy with their performance, their profitability is also strong this quarter and improving every quarter as we speak. Our Dutch business, again, there, a little over two years ago, we changed management team.
Very happy with also this team. Very market-driven, very much into the basics of our business, and that pans out. It's a good market outperformance in the Netherlands. Also very happy that we were able to help the Netherlands as a country with supplying many people for testing, for call centers. Many people that didn't have a qualification to do this, but that is where our sector is good to get 1,000, 2,000 people on a short notice to test from all sorts of sectors. Well done here. Now Profs, our Yacht business, 20% up, and then an exceptionally high EBITDA, not so much one-offs, but a very good quarter. This is not the run rate that you should pencil in for the Dutch business in your Excel. Still, very happy with what we delivered this quarter.
Our German business, also up towards 2019, good 27% growth. You see that across the board, also in Germany, e-commerce, logistics, a lot of demand. We're well-placed, predominantly through our in-house, but also our staffing. We do that well. Also Perm here doing well. Automotive, it's a bit up and down. I was talking about Germany, our Belgium client, where a few weeks we have 500 people out at one location, and then four weeks later we got 500 people in. That's what we're seeing right now, which again, is a relevant service for our clients, and we can manage. Automotive in Germany is still spotty but still improving. A good, better EBIT. As I mentioned earlier, Germany is still, in terms of EBIT, below group average.
We in Germany already started going down in 2018 as a market through legal changes in the automotive sector. We kept our infrastructure in place in Germany because we believe in this market in the years to come. Belgium, solid performer as always. 1% up, but still challenges here also. 14% market outperformance still, which given their market share, is an impressive performance. Very broad-based there. We have a very broad-based portfolio. Healthcare, for example, also important in this business. Belgian Professionals, which is Ausy predominantly, but now with Randstad, well ahead of 2019. Italy. Never tired of saying that. A star performer. Italy, Spain, these are markets where we have a great position with relatively low penetration rate in the labor market. Italy is modernizing its labor market at a quick pace.
I also very much, by the way, as a side note, like the plan that the Draghi administration has for Italy on modernizing and also the labor market. This will help. Again, 34% growth, 21% above 2019. What can I say? Perm up 86% and 42 against 2019. They invested well and ahead of the cycle. We did that in general, but they really picked it up, and we see very quick returns. Well done, Italy. [Foreign language]. Iberia. Very happy to say that our Spanish business was above 20% market share, first time in history. Compliments to the Spanish management team. Our Spanish business is from a, call it tech and touch, field steering, one of the best businesses we have. They're constantly also experimenting with new stuff that we learn from as a group. Well done.
Here, supply chain issues still, but they perform very well. I mentioned last quarter that they had a strong pipeline of new clients, which is coming through perm up. They have RPO, which is working well, and a great profitability development. Rest of Europe, by and large, similar trends to what we see in the other countries. Poland's still up. Poland was one of the first movers, so to say, in terms of growth on the back of COVID. They keep that up. U.K., very strong, 57% growth year-on-year, predominantly again in logistics, e-commerce, also very much in what you might call the gig economy. We're going to talk a bit more about that at our Capital Markets Day again. The rest of the world? Yeah, the rest of the world is like Italy, always performing well.
Firing from all cylinders. Great to mention that our Argentinian business, again, like Spain, by the way, crossed the 20% market share. They became market leader last year, and they now cross 20%, they're really gunning for it. Brazil, great performance, predominantly in RPO. We almost doubled our headcount in Brazil this year, very much investing for growth, and it's working. India, of course, country very much touched by COVID, late in COVID, unexpectedly but huge. You might remember we created this fund to help our own people and our temps who were touched by it. 13% year-over-year, 18% above 2019, and profitable. Biggest challenge in India is to get parts of the market which are profitable. Very well done, Vishy, who moved from CFO to CEO, is doing very well with his team. Well done.
Overall, a great EBITDA performance. Our global business, I mentioned it already, our Randstad Sourceright business, 48% up year-on-year, predominantly in the U.S. This is really for us a challenge how many people we can throw at it, actually, to serve and help our clients. Monster turned the corner at 1% year-on-year. We do expect the growth for Q4 to be stronger. On Monster, we're going to talk to you again at the Capital Markets Day because the more our technology becomes solid, the more we can invest in marketing. We already invested in marketing in Monster in this quarter, because we do believe that that will yield fruit. More to come on that one at the Capital Markets Day. The numbers in detail. Henry?
Thanks so much. Good morning, everybody. Let me start by expressing my appreciation for your outstanding leadership, Jacques.
Thank you.
We have a few more quarters to go together, and we'll definitely make them count. With that in mind, I'm excited to also report back on yet another strong set of results. As Jacques mentioned, despite some significant macroeconomic challenges, revenue growth in quarter three came in at 21% year-over-year and 5% above quarter three 2019 levels. The recovery of volume and revenue is broad-based in all countries across all concepts. We continue to see some regional differences still due to ongoing COVID-related restrictions. We continue to gain market share in significant parts of our portfolio without compromising our overall pricing discipline. Whilst we would never take market-leading growth for granted, delivering it with further significantly improved profitability is setting us up well for an overall strong year.
Reported gross margin came in at 19.9%, 100 basis points improvement year-over-year and 40 basis points up sequentially. We will go more into detail on the next page. The strong gross margin gave us some extra room to accelerate our investments into growth capacity, marketing, and digital transformation. However, let me also reiterate how important it is for us to safeguard attractive returns. We keep a close eye to orchestrate the right balance of growth and its conversion into EBITDA and cash. Talking about EBITDA, EUR 298 million, 4.7% EBITDA margin, up 40 basis points sequentially with an incremental conversion rate of 37% in line with guidance. Integration one-off costs came in at EUR 15 million this quarter, reflecting some minor fine-tuning of operational structures across some geographies. The reported effective tax rate sits at 26% for the first nine months of the year.
For the full year, we expect it to be 25%, between 25%-27% as guided before. With that, let's look into the gross margin on page 15. Here you see it year-over-year, the gross margin improved by 100 basis points from 18.9% to 19.9%. As you can see in the graph, 20 basis points of improvement can be attributed to the temp margin, which suffered quite severely from COVID-related inefficiencies like idle time and sickness a year ago. The middle blue bar reflects the margin effect of the strongly growing perm business. 60 basis points improvement year-over-year. Our perm business continued to do very well and increased by 74% year-over-year and is up 15% over 2019.
Lastly, our business reported on the HR solutions improved our overall gross margin with 20 basis points year-over-year, and here our excellent growth momentum in RPO is playing a key role. Whilst our gross margin path remains difficult to predict, we reiterate the importance of safeguarding attractive gross margins in all our business activities. Smart value-based pricing is fully back on the agenda as is strategic mix management and winning must-customize digital support. With that, let me turn the page to the OpEx bridge on page 16. Reported OpEx came in at EUR 953 million, EUR 25 million higher sequentially, mainly to support significantly accelerated RPO growth at attractive EBITDA margins and increased marketing support for our talent acquisition engine Monster. We kept the overhead to revenue ratio stable at 15.2%.
Of the 2,600 FTEs added in quarter three, a significant amount of consultants have been hired to support the strong RPO and perm growth. As mentioned earlier, excellence in conversion is a non-negotiable operating principle at Randstad and requires us sailing as close to the wind as possible for the best outcome in terms of growth and profitability. As reported also in the last quarters, we continue to work relentlessly to identify less productive spend to support our investments into growth and winning capabilities. That productivity journey has become part of our DNA, will provide ongoing self-help to secure sufficient fuel for growth and market-leading profitability. With that in mind, let's now move on to cash flow and balance sheet on page 17. Our free cash flow for the quarter also came in strongly at EUR 297 million.
It's purely a function of significantly improved EBITDA and a very tightly managed operating working capital. DSO came down another 1.4 days year-over-year to 51.4 on the last 4 quarters moving base. The reported year-on-year free cash flow decrease is mainly explained due to the EUR 360 million CICE cash inflow, out of which EUR 265 million was sold to third parties in Q3 2020. Our balance sheet remains to be very strong, showing a EUR 346 million net cash position and a leverage ratio of -0.3 excluding IFRS 16. This already includes the payment for the Cella acquisition. As scheduled and announced at the beginning of this month, we paid a special dividend of EUR 1.62 per share, totaling about EUR 300 million. This is not reflected in the Q3 net cash position, of course it will affect our net cash position in the 4th quarter.
That brings me to my last chart already, the conclusion outlook on slide 18. As explained, the volume recovery sustained throughout the third quarter and is broad-based across our portfolio. At the same time, visibility remains limited with ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty. Quarter three 2021 organic revenue per working day increased by 21% year-over-year and 5% compared to quarter three 2019. In September, organic sales growth was up 6% versus 2019. The development of volumes in early October indicates continued positive momentum. Steering the business in the longer term towards an ICR of 40%-50% has served us well in the past and continues to be a relevant steering principle into the future. Hence, overall, we are also aiming for an incremental conversion ratio of 40%-50% for this full year.
Quarter four 2021 gross margin and operating expenses are both expected to be broadly in line sequentially. Lastly, I would like to mention that there will be a positive point to working day impact in quarter four 2021 . That concludes my remarks. Back to the operator.
Thank you very much. If you would like to ask a question or make a contribution on today's call, please press star one on your telephone keypad now, please. Please ensure your line is unmuted locally, and then I will introduce you into the call. That's star one on your telephone keypad now, please. We do have some questions coming through. Our first question comes from the line of Hans Pluijgers from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is now unmuted.
Yes.
Hello, Hans Pluijgers. Nice.
Yeah.
I know it's also difficult for some people to pronounce, but no problem. You know who I am, so that's the main point. Jacques, a few questions from my side. First of all, on price and volume. Do you see any change in the mix? Especially looking compared to 2019, you indicate that's 5% for this quarter compared to 2019 and 6% at the end of the quarter, and Q2 was 3%. Do you see any change, is price becoming a bigger part of that development? Do you see any material change there? Secondly, on the gross margin, 20 basis points improvement compared to last year. If you compare to peers, because also you're gaining clearly market share.
On what are you winning really in the temp business? The contract, is it on execution? Also do you see that you believe you're a little bit more aggressive on pricing? Could you give maybe some feeling where do you believe you are winning it on compared to peers, especially in the temp business? Lastly, a more detailed question on the Dutch margin, the 7.5% you said is exceptional. Could you give maybe some feeling what you see as the normalized margin there?
Yeah. Normally we do two questions at once. Okay.
Sorry about it. Yeah.
There's no material change towards 2019 in pricing and volume. It's very much volume. We just have more people at work. Of course, a slightly different mix, 2019, a little bit more SME. What we, for example, now see is we're getting to in-house was growing faster. Now we see staffing growing faster than in-house, which I feel is logical. I've been with this company for 34 years, on the board for 18, and we've never competed on price. I still am called by clients who say, "I've got some bad news. You're the most expensive one of all the bidders.
That's still the case. I know that some companies who are growing less say that they are walking away from contracts. I'm not seeing it. We hired a lot of people. We were quick on the draw. We recognized market trends. We also bring our people to where the market is. We train them in our New Ways program on selling remote with digital marketing support. Already in September last year, we were in contact with all of our database to see when they would be hiring. We're just with more people, quicker and better. On the Dutch margin, it's normalized. It's not 7.5%. Anywhere around six.
Okay, thanks.
Depending a bit on the mix.
Yeah. Okay. Thanks.
Our next question comes from the line of Rory McKenzie from UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is now unmuted.
Morning, all. It's Rory here. Just two from me, please. Firstly, can you just talk about the exit rate across the regions? Within the quarter, obviously momentum slowed a little bit in France and the Netherlands compared to Q2 versus 2019. Can you just talk about the, I guess, exit rates there and what was behind that slowing specifically? Secondly, on this strong perm growth that you've seen, is that just a catch-up from a year before of little permanent hiring, or is that at all some kind of substitution from temp in some areas or other types of hiring? Jacco, you talked about the changing availability of workers and how clients need to adapt to that. Just wondering after a decade of falling worker power with things like the gig economy, whether this is kind of maybe driving a reversal in some of those trends. Thank you.
Yeah. Exit rate for country, we're not doing that, of course. We see a strengthening trend, and yeah, that actually goes for all countries. We don't see any weakening or some countries picking up more than others. Very much broad-based again, as our growth is in general. I don't think the Perm is a catch-up, Rory. What you will see, if scarcity persists, that clients will be prone to hire sooner. For us, the negative effect is then that it takes more work to keep volume growth up. Yeah, there's pricing power, so it reflects in the margin. Yeah, and then it's going to be more of a candidate market. I also think you mentioned the gig economy.
It will support further the fact that you cannot have a business model that hinges on hiring people with a salary system, which means that you're not insured, you don't do anything long-term, hence more towards employership, and of course, that's where we come in. Again, this is a theme at our Capital Markets Day, so bear with us on that one. We do think that this will, of course, drive penetration rates for temp up further. Again, more detail on that in a few weeks.
Sure. You mentioned that you've been adding more capacity to areas like perm growth. What types of sectors or specific roles are you targeting? Obviously, it's hard at the moment to work out what's going to be a long-term growing trend and just kind of the short-term adjustment of the labor market. Can you talk more about where you've put in more capacity in these high-growth areas today?
Yeah. Well, we leave that very much to the countries, and it's a slightly different setup per country. What we did is we gave them room to invest, and we asked them, ideally, it's in higher margin segments, and perm, of course, is a higher margin segment. Well, the RPO business, which is a business in itself that takes care of large clients and outs or insources the whole process or parts of the whole recruitment process, that is firing from all cylinders, not necessarily towards one sector, so to say.
Our French business, Dutch business, Italian business, very broad-based. Certainly in the staffing profiles, we have a hybrid model, as we call it. The staffing consultant also sells perm. It's a similar discussion of just asking the client what they would like. Very broad-based, not specific, but benefiting from the fact that we put in more perm consultants early.
Perfect. Okay. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Marc Zwartsenburg from ING. Marc, please go ahead. Your line is now unmuted.
Thank you. Good morning, everybody. Two from my side. First, maybe drilling in a bit on the balance of your top line versus your OpEx growth, because OpEx is up 22%. Is that still a reflection of still putting some extra investments in there and at the same time also having unit steering model at work, given your strong top line? How do you see that moving forward? Are the people that are in now fully productive already, or should we still see a sort of extra acceleration from the investments becoming more productive in the next two quarters, that your top line continues and the strong momentum like you guide for, but at the same time that your OpEx is coming down a bit in terms of year-on-year growth? How should we see that balance going forward? That's my first question.
Yeah, Marc, let me take that. Good morning. Thanks for your question. Yeah, we definitely have strong steering principles. You've seen that we are on the fourth quarter moving at 51%. We guided for 40%-50% for the rest of the year. Yeah, it's a tight balance. We get weekly data through. We are steering in such a way that we are fully supporting organic growth, also supporting the long-term investment required for also having really good quarters in many years to come. We are very close to it. That's what I said in my remarks, the long-term 40%-50% ICR is the golden principle. We keep at it.
Maybe to touch base immediately also on the ICR, because it was my next question. You're guiding for the full year, which is quite a broad range. If you translate that back to Q4, what is the reason for not giving a more detailed guide than, say, 30%-40% for Q4, for example?
Yeah. Well, we still need to make decisions. We talked about our RPO business, and if clients give us more demand for Q4, we're going to put in more people, and we don't know that. Again, the visibility remains at this four to six weeks. The supply chain issue in automotive. If a client all of a sudden, and I mentioned a Belgian company all of a sudden wanting 400, 500 people more, then we put in people. Yeah, e-commerce. On the one hand, you have rumors that the stuff won't be on the shelves for the Christmas season.
That will affect the planning of our e-commerce clients, and sometimes this goes up and down with a few hundred people. That's what we need to navigate. I think we're pretty transparent given the size of our company. I don't even know what the ICR will be for Q4 because I don't know how many people we need to put in. Maybe we can do it with the current set of people. I don't think so. That's why we said broadly in line. We will not miss any chances that we see in the market, which give us long-term returns.
No, that's good details, Jacques. Thank you for that, and well done on the quarter.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Our next question comes from the line of Konrad Zomer from ABN AMRO. A-M-R-O. My apologies. Konrad, please go ahead. Your line is now unmuted.
Konrad.
Good morning, all.
Konrad, you need to rebrand. It's either ABN or you got to dump the AMRO because that doesn't work as you hear.
Well, maybe we should call it ONO from now on then. Good morning, all. First of all, Jacques, you've worked at the company for more than half your life, and I have a lot of respect for what you've done. You don't need my compliments, but I just wanted to say very well done from my end.
Thank you.
Just one question. We hear about staff shortages and the lack of enough skilled labor in many markets. Could you maybe rank the top three countries where you start to feel the impact from tightening labor markets? Can you also maybe rank the top three industries where you feel the tightening labor markets the most?
Yeah. Well, that's a tough question. Because for example, in the U.S., there was also short-term tightening. Yeah, sounds a bit funny because it's at the end of the day, not a lot of money, but the COVID support. The COVID support at the blue-collar part of the market was too close to the actual wages when you work. We also see that in Europe sometimes, then in the perception of people, it doesn't pay to work. That is addressed now in the U.S., so most states have turned that back. The federal part is out. What remains is the state part. That means that roughly you go from $13 an hour to $10 an hour in support. We do see, although slowly by the way, because people take their time for whatever reason, we do see people getting back to the workplace.
How structural is that shortage? We don't know. There's also this, of course, a bit like many companies at the same time are seeing demand and they want to fill that. On the other hand, we have supply chain issues that still dampen demand. It's very tough for me what is the case. What is the case in Europe is, but that's more of a philosophical thing, it's really true. The increasing mismatch and the fact that in a country like the Netherlands, there are still 1 million people that want to work or want to work more, but they can't find the access to work, so to say. That's what we need to work on. The public employment services doesn't work. Same in France, same in Belgium, same in Germany. Italy and Spain, even worse, by the way. That's something we need to address.
We need to untap these resources. Otherwise, we might have scarcity, which is not necessary, and at the same time, people are unemployed. Very much on our plate. I'm spending a lot of my time talking to governments on how to address this, but also companies to change their demands. Sometimes we see demands which are, in current labor markets, not relevant and not achievable anymore. Companies need to have a talent strategy and change that. There's a lot of moving panels, and I cannot just simply say, "This is a country where it's most relevant," so to say.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Our next question comes from the line of Dominic Edridge from Deutsche Bank. Dominic, please go ahead. Your line is now unmuted.
Thanks so much for taking the questions. A couple from myself. Probably leading on from some of the questions beforehand, in terms of the labor shortages that you're seeing versus obviously healthy demand for those services, and where do you think you are in terms of the, if I was to think of it in terms of a dial, are we sort of in the red zone anywhere yet, particularly in the U.S. where it becomes a net negative for you, in terms of trying to fill vacancies? Maybe could you say where we are in other jurisdictions, particularly in Europe, on that balance? Secondly, on the restructuring, obviously most of your units seem to be doing pretty well at the moment.
Can you just discuss where you've had to do that restructuring? Lastly, I know this may preempt the CMD that you're going to be holding, but in terms of M&A and the focus, I know you've obviously done a deal with Cella in the U.S. Can you just say, is that sort of the areas where you're looking at, or should we not read too much into one particular deal? Thanks so much.
Yeah. I'll do the first and the third. Henry will do the second.
Yep.
I don't know where we are on the dial, because it very much depends on the reaction of talent and the reaction of clients. We're working very much, again, data supported, with our clients on what's available in the market. Clients can still get work done if they change their profiles, if they go into skilling, if they are willing to upskill their own workforce and create room at the bottom end of their workforce, if they're willing to put work on platforms. Lots of stuff that we've had discussions with them before COVID, even. Well, some picked it up, some were lukewarm. That depends. That's the short-term dial. There's still a lot of up dialing possible, but it needs some work.
Again, given our data, because we saw this coming, we can support, can really show that it doesn't make sense to put in more job postings, to take in another supplier, because the labor market or the position that the client has as an employer brand won't change that unless they do something else. Very interesting. The long-term dial looks rather bleak. This is not Randstad. This is labor market and economic growth as such. We need to look at all sectors in a public/private fashion. What is the available labor? There is a big reserve, potentially, of labor, and that is currently in white collar jobs, at banks, at insurance companies, at the government. Those jobs will disappear in three to five years.
We need to start re-skilling those people towards the sectors that matter and sectors that will have demand. That is very tough. I've shared our Boost program, where we offered free coaching for people who were, due to COVID, not working in a sector that we deemed not to bounce back quickly. Less than 7% fixes up on that offer. This is a one-to-one, very labor-intensive move of people that we need to do, again, publicly, privately, together, data supported. Interesting time. Again, spending a lot of my time on that. The ones who get it first, countries or companies, will be the winners. That's the first question.
Yeah. The second one, Dominic, good morning. Restructuring is literally fine-tuning of our organizational setup, small, minor things across the portfolio. Nothing really worth mentioning, and also not very material.
Additional people, actually.
No, there's a lot of little positions in there. EUR 15 million in total, so not really material for the business.
Yeah. I forgot the third question.
M&A.
Yeah. M&A. This is not preempting the Capital Markets Day. It's basically unchanged. Geographically, we favor U.S., Japan, big markets, relatively low market share, very profitable markets. We are looking at deals in the IT/staple of work space, of which Cella is a good example. There's one drawback of COVID. I would've hoped that there would be some bargains to be had. Well, apparently that's not the case. That's too bad. We never shy away from a deal that might come our way that we like, even in staffing. Yeah, that's roughly the portfolio. Mid-size, bolt-on deals, no big transformative stuff. In that sense, Cella is, yeah, I think a good example of what we are looking at.
Great. Thank you very much for the answers.
Just as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question or make a contribution on today's call, please press star one on your telephone keypad now, please. Our next question comes from the line of Oscar Val Mas from JP Morgan. Oscar, please go ahead. Your line is now unmuted.
Yes. Good morning, Jacques and Henry. Just one question from my side. On, I think this time last year in Q3 and Q4, logistics and e-commerce was growing very strongly. Could you update us on where those end markets are today, and are you still growing on a year-on-year basis in those end markets? Thank you.
The answer is yes. That is partly because of the growth of these companies, because of course, economies are opening up. We do think that the shift towards e-commerce, which of course was happening vis-à-vis regular retail, is continuing. At the same time, we're also very well positioned. We have strengthened positions with quite a lot of e-commerce players. We're taking market share. Therefore, there's also remaining growth.
Okay, great. Thank you very much.
Okay, we have no further questions in the queue at the moment. As a final reminder, it is star one if you would like to ask a question.
Okay. Well, that's it then. Thank you very much. Thanks for calling in, and we'll see you at the Capital Markets Day, and certainly also at the next quarter. Thank you.
Thanks much.
Thank you very much for joining today's call. You may now disconnect your handsets. Hosts, please stay on the line. Thank you.