Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to JSW Steel Limited Q3 FY21 results conference call hosted by IIFL Securities Limited. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star 100 on your touch-tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Anupam Gupta from IIFL Securities Limited. Thank you and over to you, sir.
Thanks, Aisha. Good evening, everyone, and thanks for joining in for JSW Steel's 3Q21 earnings call. Firstly, I'd like to thank the JSW Steel management for giving IIFL Securities the opportunity to host the call today. I would hand over the call to Ashwin Bajaj, Group Head Investor Relations for JSW Group, to introduce the management and take the call forward. Over to you, Ashwin.
Thank you very much, Anupam, and thanks for hosting the call. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. This is Ashwin Bajaj, and it's my pleasure to welcome you to JSW Steel's Q3 FY2021 earnings call. We have with us today the management team represented by Mr. Seshagiri Rao, Joint Managing Director and Group CFO, Dr. Vinod Nowal, Deputy Managing Director, Mr. Jayant Acharya, Director Commercial and Marketing, and Mr. Rajeev Pai, CFO. We will start with opening remarks by Mr. Rao and then open the floor to Q&A. With that, over to Mr. Rao.
Good evening. Welcome you all to the briefing of financial performance for the Q3 FY21. I'm very happy to share with you that JSW Steel has been rated by CDP for climate action to the leadership level of A- when Asian companies' average was D. This is in recognition of the focus which JSW Steel is giving on sustainability. It is into our core of our business where we know we can create some significant impact, and we have set fairly very ambitious goals. These goals are aligned with what India has committed as a part of the Paris Agreement. We have set the ambitious target to reduce our CO2 emissions by 41% by 2030 from 2005 levels and achieve a net carbon neutrality at our Coated operations.
Over and above this environmental target, on the social front, safety at all our sites is very, very important for us, and we are focused on zero harm for all our people and employees. We continue to strengthen our safety programs and training, leading to 330,000 safety observations this year. There has been a 12.5% reduction in LTIFRs this year versus FY2020. Through JSW Foundation, we empower communities located around our plants across 15 districts in 11 states. It works within the areas of health and nutrition, education, youth empowerment, ensuring water security and sanitation. Today, JSW Foundation positively impacts one million lives on a daily basis. We have attached two slides on sustainability in our presentation, which gives a lot of details on also the importance and trust as a company we are giving on sustainability.
Coming back to the global economic situation, after the COVID-19 crisis where global economic activity has come to a grinding halt, a slew of measures have been taken by various governments and the central banks. A very large fiscal stimulus, which is equal to 12% of global GDP, has been given by the various governments, further supported by huge liquidity infusion by central banks where their holding of government debt is over $25 trillion today. There is a lot of liquidity that has been provided, a lot of support that has been given by the governments to tide over the coronavirus issues. With that, the rebound in economic activity which we are seeing, it is expected in the year 2021, there will be a positive growth of 4%, as it is 4.3% in the year 2020. This positiveness is coming based on two assumptions.
The huge liquidity which is there today is not expected to go down or be withdrawn in the near future, and the COVID vaccine application will be accelerated, and the fear of COVID will be behind us. These are the two major assumptions based on which the global economy in the year 2021 is expected to show a growth of 4%. The recovery in the overall economic activity has also got reflected in the way of very robust recovery in the steel demand. The underinvestment in the construction and infrastructure sector across the world, that picked up. That is translated to very good recovery in the overall steel demand in the global markets that is also seen by way of the good realizations and increase in steel prices.
In India, after having seen the worst contraction in the steel demand in the overall GDP in June 2020, because of, again, measures taken by the government and also accommodative policy followed by the Reserve Bank of India, we have seen a good recovery in the auto sector. Large infrastructure projects have restarted. Real estate, there is a traction. The government announcement of PLI scheme for boosting manufacturing in India also has some impact. Government has also announced that the manufacturing overall they want to take to $1.175 trillion by 2030. That way, this year, that is FY22, there will be a very good growth, a very good recovery, and the momentum to continue as far as India is concerned. If I see the steel demand in India, in the month of April, it was just 1 million tonnes.
In the month of December, it went up to 10.28 million tonnes, which is 10 times of what we have seen in April. That is a kind of robust recovery in the steel demand in India. It is starting from rural India to every sector, packaging sector, large infrastructure projects, white goods, warehousing. In several sectors, we have seen a very good traction that is reflected by way of a growth of 19% in the month of December, year-on-year basis in steel demand in India. If I see from that angle as far as JSW Steel is concerned, this is the best quarterly consolidated EBITDA. We could achieve this number majorly due to improvement of iron ore supplies. Iron ore integration in the last quarter went up to 49% compared to 26% in the Q2.
This enabled us to improve our capacity utilization to 91% in quarter three from 86% in quarter two. In the month of December, the capacity utilization was over 94%. The integration of captive iron ore mines and easing of logistics constraints enabled us to get iron ore to our plants and improve the capacity utilization in the last quarter. In line with the improvement in the domestic demand, we have also moderated our exports. Our exports in the last quarter were 12%, as against 28% in Q2. We have also completed the acquisition of Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited on the 19th of October 2020. These results will include the two and a half months' performance of Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited. The blended net sales realizations for the quarter went up by 20% quarter-on-quarter, and year-on-year, it went up by 26%.
The iron ore prices went up in India. They went up from INR 1,960 in the month of June 2020 to INR 4,610 in December and further up by another INR 200 later. There is a 135% increase in the iron ore cost. When international prices went up by 94% in the same period, Indian iron ore price in percentage terms went up much steeper relative to what happened in the international markets. Due to this, the costs have gone up on a quarter-on-quarter basis by 8% and year-on-year basis by 2%. In view of higher capacity utilization, lower fixed cost, good product mix, moderation of exports, and higher domestic sales, all this led to higher margins in the quarter. On a standalone basis, the margin per tonne was INR 14,449, which is 29.3%.
The production for the quarter is 4.08 million tonnes, and the consolidated sales were 3.95 million tonnes. As I mentioned, the domestic sales are 3.48 million tonnes, which is 13% higher. We could increase our domestic sales as the auto sector has done extremely well. Our sales to the auto sector on quarter-on-quarter basis went up by 30%. Our retail sales went up by 35%. Our value-added steel sales as a percentage of the total sales went up to 57%, which is a 7% growth quarter-on-quarter. The EBITDA on standalone basis, we reported INR 5,633 crore, again, with a 35% growth. The profit after tax on standalone was INR 2,829 crore. Our overseas subsidiaries could reduce the overall operating cost further down. If I take out one- off the items and then look at the operating EBITDA for the Q3, it was INR 84 crore from overseas.
Including the one- off the items, it comes to INR 208 crore. The Indian subsidiaries, Coated, Asian Colour Coated Ispat, Industrial Gases, ARCL, all together contributed cumulatively INR 702 crore. After taking the losses in the overseas subsidiaries and the positive EBITDA from Indian subsidiaries, the consolidated EBITDA was INR 5,946 crore. It is the highest-ever EBITDA for the company. It is INR 15,070 per tonne, which is higher by 35% quarter-on-quarter. The profit after tax was INR 2,669 crore. This is how the performance of the quarter unfolded. As regards to the projects which are under implementation, the Vijayanagar project is under implementation. The pellet plant is under heating. It will get commissioned before the end of this month. Part of the pellet produced can be used in this quarter.
That benefit also will come by replacing the lumps which we are buying in the market and also in increasing the productivity at the Vijayanagar plant. The CRM-1 will get completed by March 2021, as we have been guiding. coke oven plant and the colour-coated line, balance all units will get commissioned in this quarter at Vijayanagar. At Vasind, Tarapur, and Kalmeshwar, one galvanizing line, the tin plate and CAL line, they will get commissioned in the next year. Balance all units will get commissioned before 31st of March 2021. Dolvi, we are very close to commissioning the units. More or less, they are all ready. The only concern which we have is getting visas for foreign technicians and equipment suppliers who have to be necessarily present at the site to help us in commissioning of the units.
Some of the places, particularly China, where we have some issues in getting the visas for them, we are working very hard to see that this project is completed. What we can guide right now is that the integrated operation may slip to the quarter one of next year, particularly the melt shop. That is the area where we have some issues in commissioning in this quarter. That may get postponed to the quarter one of 2022. The total debt of the company is a leveraging story as far as this quarter is concerned. We have brought it down to INR 51,793 crore. The debt to EBITDA has come down to 3.53, and the debt to net worth is 1.29. We could reduce the debt by INR 1,100 crore in this quarter, and for nine months, it is INR 1,680 crore.
The reduction in the debt has happened after completing the acquisition of Asian Colour, where we have made investment of INR 1,550 crore. The EBITDA for nine months is close to INR 11,700 crore, which is almost equal to what we have achieved for 12 months in the last financial year. The incremental cash generation in the operations and also release of close to INR 2,600 crore from the working capital in the nine months we have used for reducing the debt of the company. The total capital expenditure which we have incurred for nine months was INR 6,318 crore. We will be within the guidance of INR 9,000 crore for the year that we have provided in the beginning of the year. We have given the guidance of 16 million tonne production and 15 million tonne sales.
As again, as 16 million tonne, we have achieved 10.89 million tonne for the first nine months. If we have to complete the guidance of 16 million, then we have to produce close to 5 million tonne in the Q4, which is not possible. When we gave the guidance of 16 million tonne, we thought whatever we have lost in the Q1, 1.2 million tonne, we'll be able to make it up in the Q2, Q3, Q4. Because of iron ore shortages, even though we produced in line with last year, we could not make up the loss that has happened in the Q1. That is why we will be at 95% of our guidance in this financial year in terms of production. As far as volume of sales are concerned, 15 million tonne guidance we have given for the year.
We have achieved 10.95 million tonne on a consolidated basis. We should do around 4 million tonne for the Q4. We are very confident that we will be able to achieve our guidance for the sales. One more important achievement in this quarter is that the turnaround of Monnet Ispat. The company's name has been changed as JSW Ispat Special Products Limited . We have been guiding that within two years, we'll be able to turn around this company. This is the first quarter after we took over. The company made an EBITDA of INR 152 crore and a net profit of INR 29 crore. With that, I request any questions are there, we'll be able to clarify. Thank you.
Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touch-tone telephone.
If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. The first question is from the line of Amit Dixit from Edelweiss. Please go ahead.
Thanks a lot for the opportunity and congratulations for a very good set of numbers. I have two questions. The first one is on a debt reduction plan in Q4. We see that the operating environment is quite conducive, and we might have good cash accretion. What kind of debt reduction plan do you have in mind for the current quarter?
We have certain inorganic growth, as you know, Bhushan Power and Steel. BPSL has to be done in case the Supreme Court adjudicates the pending litigations.
We will not be able to guide about reducing the debt in this quarter. Assuming that BPSL is not there as we exclude the cash required for BPSL, then the overall debt levels will come down in this quarter. I do not want to give a number how much it will be reduced, but it will be lower than what you have seen as of 31 December 2020.
Great. That is helpful. The second question is on Dolvi. Now, since you have indicated that the integrated operation has been pushed to Q1, is there any quantity or the production of steel that you can guide from Dolvi in next year?
That we will be able to come back in the month of May 2021 with the final numbers. Integrated operation is pushed to Q2 does not mean that we will not get production from the expansion facility at Dolvi.
It will be available for a significant portion of the next financial year. Only one unit like melt shop, there are some delays. Delays in the sense in getting the foreign technicians, visas for them. That is the area where we are finding some difficulty. We are working very hard to see that even that is commissioned as early as possible. If at all it is not workable to get the visas and get the technicians at site, then the integrated operation will be done in the Q1 of next year. Actual guidance about the quantum of production accurately we'll be able to give in the month of May 2021.
Okay, sir. That's helpful. Thanks and all the best.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Vineet Maloo from Birla Sun Life. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Good evening, Mr. Rao.
My question is regarding raw material availability. Could you guide in terms of ramp-up of captive mines that we had run in Odisha? What kind of volume we've done and what is the outlook in terms of Q4 and for the next year?
Ramp-up of the iron ore production started happening from November, where we got logistics availability and easing of the constraints that were there prior to that. We also got the siding into our custody from November onward. With that, we could increase the ramp-up production and dispatch also more. We are at a level of close to 1.8-2 million tonnes. That is the level at which we are producing and dispatching right now. I think we should be able to maintain that going forward.
Okay, sir. Should we assume for next year and on an annual basis?
Yes.
Okay.
My second question quickly is that you mentioned that you've seen a sharper increase in domestic iron ore prices. In that situation, does it make sense to import for us? I know we've done that in the past, but is it feasible for us to import at this stage for grades and impurities, etc.?
No, in India, the steel plants are set up not to import iron ore except in exceptional circumstances. Only the advantage that is available to Indian steel companies is domestic iron ore. We have anyhow to import balance all raw materials. Whether you take steel grade, limestone, or you take any ferro alloys, or you take refractories, or you take coking coal, they all have to be imported. Therefore, the intention is to make iron ore domestically available to the steel sector, either captive or to buy in the market.
Sure.
No, in a sense, it's because, sir, there has been in specific situations, there are shortages and price shoots up too much. That's why I was asking, I mean, does it make sense to import in commercial sense to import based on grades and impurities adjustments? That's all.
It is a dynamic situation. We can't say we will not do. We continue to evaluate for different units of JSW. The port-based plants like Dolvi, we continue to evaluate whether to get from Odisha or to get from NMDC, Chhattisgarh, or to import. Based on that, we continue to take the calls on that. It is a dynamic situation.
Sure. Sure. Understood, sir. Thank you so much.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Pinakin Parekh from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much, sir. Good evening, everyone.
My first question is just to understand the steel market at this point of time. What we understand is that different export prices in the world are quoting at different levels. Japan is over $700, Russia is over $700, China is at $640. For an Indian consumer today, what will be the landed price of steel, and what are the domestic mills charging at this point of time?
Yeah. The prices internationally over the last month have gone up substantially, I think, by and large across all geographies of the world. That has been reflected in India as well. The primary reason for that has been, I think, the supply gap which was there due to production cuts in the first half, a reduction in inventories which were carried out by customers across the globe.
When the demand came back, there was a gap in the system, and the prices have reflected that also on the back of a high iron ore price globally. I think India has been, by and large, following the international market with respect to the price increases. We have increased the prices on a monthly basis depending on the international price movements. For the month of January, I think the spot prices for hot rolled coil, for example, went up by about INR 2,000 per tonne. For long product, it went up by about INR 2,500 per tonne on a spot market basis. Contractual prices, as you're aware, continue to be constant on a quarterly basis or on project basis, as the case may be. That is held for the period of the contract, except in certain cases where there are some moderations which are required.
Other than that, contractual prices are held for the period of the contract. By and large, movement reflecting international numbers in India as well.
Sure, sir. My second question is on Mr. Rao's initial comments that if the BPSL acquisition goes through, the payment would have to be made, and hence the debt would change accordingly. Does it mean that if the Supreme Court were to allow the structure that was originally thought has undergone a change and JSW would look to acquire 100% fully of BPSL, or would it remain an off-balance sheet item for the company?
The Supreme Court is not going to decide what structure we need to do. The resolution plan, whatever we have submitted, and the intention of the company not to consolidate once we acquire BPSL will remain. I don't think that will change.
The issue is only equity investment. Part of it has to go from JSW Steel. To that extent, my cash balances that are available will come down. To that extent, net debt goes up. That is why when I talked about deleveraging, we talked excluding BPSL, which is uncertain even today that it will happen in this quarter or not.
Understood, sir. The last question is that the three moving parts between steel prices, the company's iron ore cost, and we have seen some increase in coking coal prices. If steel prices were to stay constant at January levels, would margins still expand in the March quarter, or the cost pressures are too high and margins would not be we would not see margin expansion on a pertinent basis?
See, the way the iron ore prices in India have moved up when the international prices of iron ore went up.
If $170 prices go up further in the international markets, then we can expect further cost pressures that may emanate from iron ore. At the same time, what is interesting here is more iron ore availability we are seeing in the marketplace. One is increase in iron ore production within Odisha itself, either from captive mines or otherwise. Number two, Government of India also permitted some of the mines which were auctioned and not became operational, asking Odisha Mining Corporation to operate those mines through MDO. Some of those mines will come in. Similarly, the mines where it is captive, they are allowed to sell in the market up to 50%, and the sale has been asked to auction the iron ore. A lot of steps have been taken to ease the current shortage of iron ore.
That may cool down the increase in iron ore prices in the domestic market. As regards to the coking coal is concerned, the impact part of it may come in the second half of March or early April. Otherwise, we have already booked more or less for the quarter. The increase in coking coal prices will get reflected in the next quarter.
Understood. Thank you very much, sir.
Thank you. In order to ensure that the management is able to answer questions from all participants, we would request the participants to please limit their questions to two per participant. The next question is from the line of Amit Murarka from Motilal Oswal Financial Services. Please go ahead.
Hello. Good evening, yeah. My first question is around the contracts or the contracted volumes.
The auto contracts, I believe, were for a six-monthly basis, and they were contracted at a much lower price. As you said, generally the price does not move during the contract. Just to understand, given that the price hikes have been so sharp, is there any scope? Also, given that there is raw material inflation, also like iron ore, is there any scope for renegotiation during this period, or is it a watertight contract? Hello?
Yeah. Sorry, Amit. Yeah. Your automotive question, basically, automotive usually is on a half-yearly kind of pricing contract. This time, the prices were finalized again in the month of October, where the price movements for the previous periods were taken into account.
Since the movement of steel prices globally has happened mostly after that, there is a substantial difference which has come between the spot prices and the automotive prices, as you also rightly pointed out. While the automotive quantity requirements have gone up from all our auto majors, our customers, and our supplies also we have increased to them in October-December, in spite of the fact that they were on a contracted lower price, we have made requests to them to basically, for this period, break the increase which would be applicable from 1 April in two parts, one from 1 January and one from 1 April, so that the load does not come on any of us in one go.
If you recall, during the April-September period, also when the pandemic was there, while there was a price increase admissible to the steel majors, in view of the COVID situation and the request by auto majors, we had also deferred the increase for the period of April to September. In view of the current exigencies of gap which has come in, we have made a request with the auto majors to look at it in two parts, one from 1st January and the balance from 1st April.
Okay. Sure. That's very clear. Thanks. Also, just one clarification on the BPSL acquisition. I think there was still some confusion around whether the BPSL EBITDA that has been earned since the resolution happened, would it come to JSW, or it is still a gray area because it's not yet resolved?
No, as far as our understanding is concerned, we submitted resolution plan which is approved by the COC and also by NCLT and NCLAT as a going concern. As a going concern, every one of us understands what it means with regard to EBITDA, to whom it has to get, to whom it has to come. Anyway, it will not come to JSW Steel. It will remain with BPSL. Only some litigations are there in the Supreme Court saying that this EBITDA should belong to lenders. There is already a Supreme Court adjudication in the matter of Essar Steel that the distribution of EBITDA that accrues during the CIRP period is governed by the terms of the process document.
Based on that and also precedents which have happened so far, I don't find any clause in the process document of that nature which specifies that it belongs to lenders. The litigation is still pending, so we have to wait for that. As on date, yes, there is a litigation on this particular item. Sure. Just quickly also, in the top line, what would be the kind of iron ore sales that are booked in the top line? Could you quantify that? This amount, approximately INR 550. EBITDA also, if you could? EBITDA, we will not be able to do that because it is almost equal to the market price. The IBM price and market price is same, so we sold at the market price.
Thank you.
We would request the current participant to please come back in the question queue for any follow-up questions as we have several participants waiting for their turn. We would request the participants to please limit their questions to two per participant. The next question is from the line of Sumangal Nevatia from Kotak Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Good evening, everyone. First question is to Mr. Acharya, with respect to steel prices, is it possible to share what would be the exit price of Q3 versus the average of Q3, and also some color on the recent price trends on the ground given the correction in the secondary market, what we've seen in the last week, and also in case there are any demand pushback at such high prices which we are sensing from consumers?
Absolute numbers, we usually do not discuss, as you are aware.
I gave basically two things here as important as that. Primary steel prices are global prices, and whatever is happening in India is by and large reflecting that. There are still maybe some gaps in flat products because flat is more led by global prices. There are still some gaps in the domestic market in some products vis-à-vis international. That means international prices are still higher in some of the flat product categories. As far as longs is concerned, I think the long prices here is again a factor of the availability. 35% of the long products by and large is from the primary producers, and 65% comes from the secondary producers.
There was a gap in supplies of iron ore in the first six to seven months, which has created a supply shortage as far as from the secondary sector, and that has created some pressure in the supply demand. I think we are seeing that evening out with iron ore price, sorry, with the iron ore quantities increasing from December. We are seeing that reflected in the market as far as long products is concerned. You are seeing that long product prices again also went up in line, but there has been some moderation in the last one or two weeks based on improved availability from the secondary sector, which is okay. I think from a perspective of a price pattern, it's fine. The demand overall continues to be strong.
We see the demand in quarter four driven by infrastructure, automotive, consumer durables, retail quite strong. In the next year as well, we are seeing a strong economic growth, also a strong steel growth. Therefore, from a demand perspective, it should be good. Prices may be rangebound depending on how the movement of supply, raw material, and global steel prices are.
Understand. Continuing on this prices, there has been some comments by government officials on the higher steel prices, mainly on the back of complaints by a few segments of consumers. Do we foresee any risk of any policy action in terms of, say, a reduction in export duty or import duty or restriction in some sort of exports being imposed by the government?
No, I don't think so. From a perspective of availability, the comment which was there was primarily, as I explained, in the long products where the supply from the secondary sector was the main issue, which was on account of iron ore. Once that iron ore production is improving, you are seeing availability from the secondary sector in long products improving, and that will automatically take care of the supply-demand and therefore the pricing. As far as movement of price and any action is concerned, I don't anticipate, I don't see any of those coming. You will also see that steel is a cyclical industry. In the first quarter of this year, the steel industry went through a loss, cumulative globally as well as in India.
At this point of time, it is going through a correction cycle, but prices are volatile, and it will continue to be cyclical. I do not anticipate any action based on one to two months' price differences in the market.
Thank you. We would request the current participant to please come back in the question queue for any follow-up questions. The next question is from the line of Ritesh Shah from Investec. Please go ahead.
Hi, sir. Thanks for the opportunity. My first question is, if you could provide some light on ACCIL, what is the effective EBITDA on a trading basis? Any accumulated losses over here, synergies with JSW, and capacity volumes? That is the first question. Secondly, any timelines on JSW Ispat Special Products ? By when will we fold into JSW Steel going forward?
Lastly, if possible, what would our take be on the mining regulations, specifically the National Mineral Index? There has also been a talk about the double taxation issue being taken up, how it can help us. Two questions from my side. Thank you.
As far as Asian Colour carry forward losses are concerned, the approval when it was accorded by NCLT, they did not permit carry forward losses for ACCIL, even though it was clearly mentioned in the resolution plan. We went for an appeal to the NCLT, it is pending. We are awaiting the outcome from the NCLT. A similar instance also happened in the case of Vardhman Industries Limited . We went to NCLT and got a favorable judgment from there. Hopefully, in ACCIL, we should get a favorable judgment from NCLT. Assuming it will happen, the accumulated losses will be close to INR 1,200-1,300 crore.
INR 1,000 crore. The accumulated losses will come to us in case it is allowed. The second point which you raised about the performance of ACCIL, there is some litigation which is pending by one bidder who came in late and then is making a lot of claims. We do not want to give at this stage too many details about ACCIL unless that litigation is resolved. As regards to Monnet Ispat is concerned, the company just turned around. Eventually, we are subject to necessary approvals once turnaround is complete, when debt to EBITDA and all is favorable, then it is at a level which is okay for JSW Steel at the time we initiate. Otherwise, in the near future, we are not looking at bringing Monnet into the fold of JSW Steel. Long term, yes. Medium term to long term, yes.
Mining regulations and taxes, there are certain amendments that are being contemplated. They're yet to come. Only we have seen that cabinet has approved. We have to see the details when it is approved by the Parliament. Then we'll be able to comment on that.
Okay. Thank you so much for the answers. I'll jump back with you.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Sanjay Parekh from Nippon India Asset Management. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Congratulations to the whole team for a great number. I have two questions. One is, given the impact on demand at higher prices, do you think it's having an impact on the demand, particularly on the long side? The second question is, coking coal has been quite benign this time in the cycle. It's recently gone up, but by and large, it's quite benign.
Of course, that's to do with the stress between Australia and China. What would be your perspective on this? What would be your reading on terms of coking coal prices, if you can guide please?
Coking coal prices have basically remained at a level of $100 FOB for some time, primarily post-China imposing a ban on Australian coal. When I say FOB, $100 ex-Australia. However, after the pickup in production in rest of the world in October, November, December from the blast furnace BOF route, we have seen high-grade Australian coking coal demand coming up again, and the price in the recent weeks have shown an increase. China continues to buy coking coal from Canada and US at a premium.
There would be a tendency for coking coal to have an upward bias due to increase in production, which we see from rest of the world coming in. As far as the impact of price on demand, which you mentioned, the second question, as far as flat steel is concerned, and because you are seeing this probably from a lens of one or two months, from a longer perspective, if you were to see from a medium term, I think the demand is much stronger because combination of pent-up demand coming in, sharp improvement in the business sentiment on reduced cases, especially in India and the vaccination program starting, infrastructure push by the government across various projects which they have announced, and continuing good demand from the automotive side. We expect the demand in general to be quite robust in the next year as well.
As a matter of fact, we probably are looking at 10%-12% growth as far as steel demand is concerned in the next financial year also. From a medium perspective, if you look at it, on a week 2020, I think the demand going forward will be quite robust.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Bhavin Chheda from Enam Holdings. Please go ahead. Yeah.
Good evening, sir. What was the number of the revenue and capital acceptances at the end of December? Revenue was INR 947 million, and CapEx is INR 491 million. Capital is INR 491 million. Okay. Regarding the overseas subsidiary, the losses have reduced, I think, and you mentioned the operating cost has gone down.
Are we at breakeven now, mainly in the US, Italy, and the plate mill pipeline, or do we still have some losses going into quarter four?
No, there are losses. Operating losses are there. The way I mentioned is operating losses are reduced, but there are one-off item provisions. If I add those provisions which are made in this quarter, the total loss works out to INR 208 crore operating loss, all overseas operations together. If I take out one-off items, the last operating loss was INR 84 crore. In Q4 also, these losses will continue to be there. The actual operations in the US, both Baytown and also Mingo, will start in the month of March 2021. We have to see for next financial year to make these operations at the operational level profitable.
Okay. Okay. Okay. Thanks a lot, sir. Yeah.
Thank you.
The next question is from the line of Gaurav Rateria from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Sir, thank you for taking my question. Sir, firstly, you explained the whole dynamics of demand supply on long products. With improved availability of iron ore and the secondary producers' production going up, do you think that there is a fraud element in the pricing and that can come up and the prices can settle down lower than the current level?
As I was explaining, I would look at the long product demand on a medium-term basis, and with infrastructure projects sharply improving in this coming year and this quarter as well, I do not think that the demand will in any way be impacted. Prices would be range-bound.
I think if the secondary sector operates in a different segment and the primary sector operates in a different segment, I think they will continue to coexist. The prices may be range-bound. If the availability from the secondary sector improves because of iron ore, the supply from there may increase in certain segments, which may moderate the prices as has happened in the last one or two weeks, which is on TMT in particular. If you look at other long products, specifically wire rods or alloy steel, we do not see any impact.
Okay. Sir, secondly, on the new mining regulation, there is some provision which mentions that the independence to decide premium over and above what royalties are being paid at the time of the renewal.
Do you think this will have an impact on fundamental cost structure, cost curve of even the low-cost miners and the country's iron ore cost curve will continue to hinge upon you? Lastly, a data point on coking coal cost reduction versus last quarter. Thank you.
As I mentioned to you, the mining regulation amendment, which is approved by cabinet, finally it has to be approved by the Parliament. One or two points which we picked up from there is there is a double taxation, royalty on royalty. Similarly, there are certain amendments relating to stamp duty, rationalization of stamp duty. Like that, there are certain issues. Today, what we are suffering is royalty on royalty. This is one area where we are expecting some amendment which will come in. We have to see the fine print, what it contains.
Okay.
Sir, data point on coking coal cost reduction this quarter versus last quarter. Thank you.
Around $6.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Abhijit Mitra from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Yes. Thanks for taking my question. The first question is on iron ore. As far as our mines are concerned, present EC is 25 million tonne, and there are talks of increasing the EC to 35 million tonne. What is the sort of timeline for this increase, and what kind of CapEx, if any, have you already sort of kept towards it?
The operations are run based on MDO basis, so there is no CapEx involved. The existing approvals are valid for two years.
Within two years, if you want to increase the capacity or renew the existing approvals, we have to apply within four months from the date of signing of the lease agreement, which we have already done. Anything that can happen will be at the end of two years. By the time we get the clearances and make it operational, I don't expect any big CapEx there. It is operated through MDO.
Right. What's the thought process, as in, are you also planning for a separate sort of steel plant to sort of augment this? As in, this has been done kept in mind of a new investment in Odisha. Is that the thought process?
That is a long-term plan, which we already announced that we would like to set up a greenfield steel plant in Odisha.
Right now, the focus is on completing the brownfield at the locations where we have already started. We would like to complete that. We look at the greenfield, not in the immediate future.
Okay. Okay. The further expansion in Vijayanagar should precede that CapEx in Odisha, right?
Yes. Brownfield, whatever possible is there, we would like to focus on brownfield where it is cheaper and quicker. Thereafter, we look at greenfield.
Right. Right. Also, one last question. Out of this 35 million tonne, what is the plan for external sales? I mean, you plan to sell 50% of it or sort of optimize the mix thereby?
No, our capacity at Dolvi is coming into production in the next year. With that, our iron ore requirements are going up.
We will just review and then see whether any surplus is available for sale in the market. If it is required, we will sell that.
Okay. Okay. Thanks. That is all from me.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Vishal Chandak from Emkay Global . Please go ahead. Vishal, your line is in talk mode. You can go ahead, please. We would request you to please unmute yourself if muted from the handset. The next question is from the line of Indrajit Agarwal from CLSA. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good evening. Thanks for the opportunity. Couple of questions. One, after all our capacities are commissioned in whatever is in pipeline right now, what would be our value-added capacity or value-added sales as percentage of total?
Value-added capacity total will be 12 million tonne, including Asian Colour, plus expansions which are going on right now.
Once all are completed, then it will be 12 million tonne.
Okay. So roughly about 50% of our total steel capacity. Secondly, what is your sense on steel inventory in India at various levels, both at mill level and at trader level? Do you think whatever the inventory draining that has happened in the past six, nine months, has that been refilled, or there's still some scope of inventory getting refilled into the channel?
The inventory, if you look at the equation of demand, production, imports, exports, we are seeing that in the nine months, inventory in India has gone down by 3.2 million tonnes. In the last quarter alone, we are seeing an inventory reduction of 1.3 million tonnes. The supply chain, I think the inventory reduction has taken place substantially.
The restocking demand, I think, would probably sustain in some of the products for this quarter also. Thereafter, I think the supply chain will be able to come back to normal levels.
Sure. Last one if I may, is there any logistics issue that you are facing in iron ore anymore, or most of that is sorted right now?
It's not possible to sort out everything. Today, why we are more comfortable than last quarter is that we have two sidings. One siding, we own as a part of the mine. The second, we have an arrangement with that. We are able to dispatch more iron ore. Otherwise, still the Odisha roads and transportation to the port, availability of rakes remain a constraint which we have to manage on a daily basis.
The Government of India's latest announcement that the domestic movement of iron ore will have priority over exports is a great welcome step. Also, on the siding side, we get priority. These things are good for easing of constraints that are there in the movement of iron ore. As of now, constraints are there, but we have to manage.
Sure. Thank you for the answers. All the best.
Thank you. We take the last question from Satyadeep Jain from Ambit Capital. Please go ahead. Hello. Yes.
Hi. Thank you for the opportunity. Just a couple of questions.
One on the iron ore, if you're producing at 2 million tonne monthly run rate, in this quarter till Dolvi ramps up, would you be looking at stockpiling some for Dolvi, or is it going to be mainly in merchant sales, whatever extra you're producing till Dolvi expansion comes up?
No, today there is a shortage of iron ore even in Karnataka because Dolvi is still not started. Part of the iron ore we are supplying to our Vijayanagar plant and also to Dolvi. Plus, as you rightly said, we have to now stock up for the expansion of Dolvi plant. Altogether, the majority of the iron ore that is produced will get shipped either to Salem or Dolvi or Vijayanagar. If any surplus is there, we are selling in the market either to Monnet or other companies.
Okay.
Secondly, thank you for all the details on the BPSL front. On the carbon emissions, any more concrete details as to how you plan to achieve less than 2 tonne of CO2? Also, on the specific energy, is there a possibility that the target that you have for 5.91, I think, is there a possibility of that being more aggressive? That still seems somewhat high compared to what some of the other players report.
Yeah. We have benchmarked with what we were in 2005 and what we would be in 2030. As you rightly said, energy intensity is an ongoing exercise. This is the goal. It does not mean that we do not improve beyond 5.91. Similarly, on the CO2 emission side, we can give a lot of details from 3.39, what we are today, and how we can become 2 going forward by 2030, if not more.
We have the details either solid waste utilization or water or waste usage or air pollution. All the areas we have the details which we can provide.
Okay. Thank you so much.
Thank you. That was the last question. I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments.
We are at the fag end of commissioning several projects that are ongoing in various locations. This will double our downstream capacity and also increase our upstream capacity by 35-40%. We are coming up with this incremental capacity when overall there is a shortage of supply and the demand for steel is expected to be robust for next year. A total base of around 91-92 million tonne of steel consumption in this financial year is expected to grow, if not more than 10%, at least by 10% in the next year.
JSW Steel is in a very good position with incremental capacity and also very high-end value-added steel products and very high integration in terms of iron ore from the captive mines. A lot of cost-saving projects like pellet plant, coke oven plants , power plants getting commissioned in this year. There is a great future in my view for JSW going forward. Thank you.
Thank you. On behalf of IIFL Capital Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.