Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A.'s first quarter of 2025 earnings conference call. Today with us are Mr. Raphael Horn, CEO, and Mr. Miguel Mickelberg, CFO and IRO. This call is being recorded and simultaneously translated. You can hear the translation by clicking the interpretation button. To those hearing the English translation, you can mute the original audio by clicking Mute Original Audio. Also, you can find the slide deck in English on the company's investor relations website at www.ri.cyrela.com.br. During the company's presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. After the presentation, we will hold a question-and-answer session. To ask a question, please click the Q&A button and enter your name and organization. When your name is called, a request will pop up on your screen to unmute your microphone before asking your question.
We would like to inform you that any statements that may be made during the call related to Cyrela's business perspectives, operating, and financial targets are projections made by the company's management that may or may not occur. Investors should understand that political, macroeconomic, and other operating factors may affect the future of the company and lead to results that differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. To open Cyrela's 1Q25 earnings call, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Raphael Horn, CEO. Mr. Horn, you may proceed.
Good morning. We started 2025 amid global uncertainty. Recent geopolitical developments have added volatility to the international economic scenario. In Brazil, the context remains challenging, with interest rates at a high restrictive level, requiring greater prudence and selectivity. In this context, Cyrela reported a positive performance in 1Q25, with year-on-year growth in the main operating targets.
We launched 18 projects in the quarter with a PSV of R$ 3.4 billion, 183% higher year-on-year. Sales came to R$ 2.1 billion, up by 34% year-on-year. Sales speed remained at a healthy level, 52%, confirming the good customer acceptance of Cyrela's products. We posted net revenue of R$ 2 billion, gross margin of 32.5%, and net income of R$ 328 million, all of which grew on a year-on-year basis. Last 12 months, ROE was 20.9%, reflecting the continued growth trajectory with profitability and value creation for shareholders. Even with the increase in the size of operations, the company achieved positive cash generation of R$ 71 million, reducing its net-to-debt equity ratio to 9.3%. Cyrela ratifies the strength of its capital structure and reinforces the commitment to keeping this ratio at healthy levels. Cyrela will remain committed to the customer's journey, developing projects that offer high-value experiences to our audience.
We are deeply grateful for the trust and relationship with the customers, as well as employees, shareholders, and partners. Now, let's talk about the operating results.
Thank you, Rafa. On the first slide, I'd like to give you some color on our launches. We had 18 new products launched with a PSV of R$ 3.4 billion, 183% higher year-on-year and 31% lower quarter-on-quarter, excluding swaps and considering only the company's stake. Slide 5 shows the launch of Cupid Tower in the city of Rio de Janeiro, a major success in the beginning of the quarter. Now, let's talk about our sales performance on slide 6. In the quarter, pre-sales, excluding swaps, came to BR$ 2.1 billion in Cyrela's stake, 34% higher year-on-year and 40% lower quarter-on-quarter. Now, let's take a look at the sales speed. The company's SOS in the last 12 months was 52.6%.
On the right-hand side, we can see the evolution of sales per launch vintage, and we can see that the projects launched in 1Q2025 have been 33% sold. On slide 8, let's talk about the inventory. Inventory and market value totaled R$ 12.4 billion and in the company's stake, R$ 9.3 billion. There was an increase by 18%, reaching R$ 12.4 billion at the end of the quarter. Now, finished units. We had R$ 1.5 billion, R$ 1.3 billion in the company's stake, with an increase of 2% from R$ 1.515 billion to almost R$ 1.54 billion at the end of the quarter. Now, delivered units. We delivered six projects with a PSV of R$ 700 million, very similar to 1Q2024 and a sharp drop quarter-on-quarter where we had R$ 2.3 billion, a 70% reduction. Now, let's take a look at the financial results, starting with revenue.
Our revenue was R$ 1.9 billion, a 24% increase year-on-year and a decrease by 22% quarter-on-quarter. The gross profit was R$ 634 million, with 32.5% of margin, with 60 basis points in gap in comparison with Q4 2024. Our net income in the quarter was R$ 328 million against R$ 267 million in Q1 2024, and our return on equity, net income of over the last 12 months over the average shareholder's equity was 20.9%, which is the same as we had in Q4 2024. Now, liquidity and debt on slide 14. Our leverage was 9.3% in the period, net debt over equity ratio, with a cash position of R$ 5 billion. Therefore, our net debt is R$ 917 million. 86% of the total gross debt is long-term. Now, cash generation. We generated R$ 71 million in the quarter in comparison with R$ 130 million year-on-year and R$ 61 million quarter-on-quarter. With that, we can go to the Q&A session.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. We will now begin the Q&A session. To ask a question, please click the Q&A button and enter your name and organization. When your name is called, a request will pop up on your screen. Unmute your microphone before asking your question. The first question comes from Mr. Gustavo Cambaúva with BTG Pactual. Please go ahead.
Hello. Good morning. I have two questions. First, can you give us more color on the sales performance in the second quarter? In the first quarter, you had strong launches and sales. I would like to know if there is any slowdown in your sales at all or if you are still selling well, your finished units and launched units as well in the beginning of the second quarter. The second question is about your expectations for launches throughout 2025.
When we look at Cyrela and the competitors, your pipeline, do you still have expectations to exceed the launches that you had in 2024, or are you more careful, more cautious now? I'd like to know more about your expectations for launches in 2025.
Hello, this is Rafa. We can't really predict the future, but I believe that we are going to launch all the projects foreseen for this year, and that's going to exceed last year's launches. Everything indicates that the conditions are good. Of course, the market is tough with such high interest rates, but sometimes it's even easier when the market is so challenging. Cyrela sometimes is more recognized because of our quality and sales force. We are more renowned in the market, so in difficult situations, sometimes we perform better.
If we have to change our minds, we can do it and shut down some launches, not go ahead with them. I am not going to give you the details about the launches in the second quarter, but again, the conditions are compatible with the launch pipeline that we have for this year. I continue to be moderately excited to make our pipeline happen. If I tell you that I am 1,000% sure that it is going to happen, I would be lying to you, but that is the baseline scenario that we work with, and I reasonably believe that it is going to happen, but we do not have any guidance to give you. This is a family business. We are the owners of the company. If we think we have to cut launches, we will do it, but I do not think that is going to be the case.
Thank you, Rapha.
Very clear. Have a good day.
Next question, Mr. André Mazini with Citi.
Hello, Rapha and Miguel. Thank you for taking my question. My first question is about the land bank that you bought from the Safra Group. We know that there is no exclusivity, but it is probably the third plot that you bought from them. It is a big one, high-profile plot of land. Can we expect you to buy more plots of land in that partnership, considering that they have been successful? The second question is about transfers to banks with high interest rates. Are customers struggling with transfers and having a higher launch value, considering that the interest rates will probably plateau now, but still they are at very high levels?
Hello. Specific partnerships for land bank or commercial partnerships. This is not the right forum for us to talk about that, really.
We have a great relationship with Safra, but we shouldn't be gossiping in public. Now, Miguel will address your second question.
Good morning, André. About transfers. In the first quarter, the behavior was healthy. We did not have any increase in cancellations. The transfers team has reported that customers have been looking for better rates. They are shopping around banks. When it comes to LTV, we saw slight reductions with lower LTVs, but the level is still below our table. It's below 50% LTV. In the past, the average was 55% in the units that were transferred. The level is still healthy, not because the customer is having to pay more for transfers. That's because the customers see the opportunity of making advance payments when they make the purchase or right after it. The transfer amount is much lower than the full amount for the unit.
I think that is a result of the healthy customer portfolio that we have, and we believe that we are going to keep the same performance level throughout the rest of the year.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Fanny Oreng with Santander. Please go ahead.
Hello. I have two questions. First one about costs. What is the trend right now for costs, materials, and services in general? Also, do you know what the salary adjustment will be in São Paulo? I think that will happen in May, right? Also, I would like to know the impact of net present value in the quarter. Those are my questions.
About costs. For labor, we know how difficult it is. It is a chronic issue, but we have been able to navigate it well.
I believe that the most acute part of this problem is behind us. We have not seen any disruptions in the construction sites due to labor. We have been adjusting our productivity, and we have kept the same cost levels that we had before. When it comes to materials, FX appreciated a little bit, and that has not impacted us. About the salary adjustment, that has not been calculated yet. The INPC inflation rate last year was 5.3%. It should be a little bit higher than that because of the labor shortage, but we have not had any formal result yet. The unions are still discussing it. When it comes to adjustment to net present value, we had an impact of 100 basis points on the margin.
Last quarter, we told you that the impact was 190 basis points on our gross margin, and we also told you that the seven months from January 2023 to September 2024 had an average impact of 40 basis points on our gross margin. It's very hard to predict what's going to happen looking forward because it involves two factors. The first one is the receivables portfolio and NTN-B, which is the Treasury bonds in Brazil. Of course, I'm not going to try and even predict or guess what NTN-B levels will be. When it comes to our receivables portfolio, it should increase a little bit because we aim to grow in the year, but 40 basis points should be the level to be expected. Of course, we can see some fluctuation here and there over the quarters.
Okay, thank you, Miguel.
The next question comes from Pedro Lobato with Bradesco BBI. Please go ahead.
Hello, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. The first question is about the fourth tier. The projects that are in Vivas's pipeline, are they eligible for price increases without having to make major changes to the project? Maybe the fourth tier could give you an upside in prices and margins for Vivas, of course. Now the table that you showed in the quarter, when we look at the projects with partnerships, there was a sharp decrease, considering that this line is very significant in the company's result. I'd like to know if there's any project in your pipeline and maybe that line item can increase, or should that be the trend for the rest of the year?
Good morning, Pedro. Thank you for your questions. About the fourth tier, that's a good change for us. It improves customer affordability.
For customers that are in that bracket, the impact is positive in terms of affordability. We should remember that in São Paulo we have some zoning restrictions which reduce the units where we can have that benefit, but it is a positive impact. We cannot quantify the impact yet, but this is good news for the segment. About the equity method income, I'd like to thank you for what you said about the table. Actually, we have two main effects here. First, the joint venture with SKR, with a non-recurring effect in the first quarter. The second one is a partnership with a local company in Goiânia, in the state of Goiás. We expect to keep the same level that we had in Q4 2024 and Q1 2025.
Of course, when we launch big projects with partners and when partners launch products, we can see fluctuations in that line item. However, 1Q24 was unusual and not this year's quarter.
The next question comes from Mr. Rafael Rehder with Safra.
Hello. Thank you for taking my question. About Vivas's fourth tier, now with the Minha Casa Minha Vida program, with more positive conditions, do you consider changing your launch mix going forward? Vivas should be accounting for one-third of your launches. Is that number going to increase at all? The second question is about deliveries for 2025 and cash generation as a result. Thank you.
Good morning, Rafael. First, about the Minha Casa Minha Vida program, it is not changing our strategy. We like to grow steadily, slowly but surely.
Minha Casa Minha Vida, as we announced earlier, should account for 30% of our launches, which is a high number. Yes, we are very excited about this segment and Vivas. Vivas has a great team. They are performing very well. About deliveries, this year we are going to see a significant increase in deliveries year on year, and that can help cash generation. That is why in the previous quarter, we told you that we expect to generate cash. In the second quarter, we are going to have more disbursements with land bank. Let's see how the quarter ends, and then we will be able to give you more precise information. Maybe in the next quarter, in the next call, we will be able to give you more information about this.
What about the LTV for the 2025 portfolio?
The LTV is similar to 50%, as I said earlier.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Mr. Tainan Costa with UBS.
Good morning. First, about provisions. You made a provision this quarter for the same amount as last year. And looking at 1Q2024, it concentrated most of that amount. I would like to understand the seasonal effect. Should we always expect a stronger first quarter and why? Was there anything structural related to this, any accounting changes? In other operating expenses, I would like to understand why it was a little bit higher than we had in the past quarters. Of course, in the recent past, you had Cury, and that had a positive impact on those lines. I would like to know if there was any one-off effect and what to expect going forward. Thank you.
Morning, Tainan. About provisions, are you referring to indemnification?
No, no, for cancellations.
Oh, okay. This year, it was a little bit higher in the first quarter. Whenever we design the plans for the quarters, in this quarter, we had a high delivery volume. This year, it was a little bit higher because of the seasonal effects, because we review the plan, because at this point, we stop looking back to see what happened, and we look at the portfolio that we have. It also happened because of the launches. We have the provisions for cancellations every time we launch products. In this quarter, we repaid the goodwill. We have goodwill in one of the land banks. As the construction evolves, we will have that. Another effect is that we did not have any sales of Cury stock. Last year, we had about R$ 30 million coming from that, from selling Cury stock.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Carla Graça with Bank of America.
Thank you very much for taking my questions. I have two. What is the competition for land bank right now? Some competitors are accelerating launches. Do you see any impact on that at all? And about selling expenses, they went up this quarter. They are now accounting for 7% of sales in comparison with 4% in the previous quarter. Is there any one-off effect related to that, or is it just related to a higher launch volume in the quarter?
Hello, Carla. Competition for land bank, I think it's been worse. It's been worse in the past. Competition is usually reasonable or very tough. It is reasonable right now. When it's too tough, that's when we have foreign funds coming to Brazil and IPOs. I think it's at a reasonable level right now.
It's a scenario where we can operate well.
Carla, about selling expenses, this is Miguel. In the first quarter, it is common for us to have a slightly higher volume. Usually, we have many launches in the fourth quarter of the year, and we have more expenses with sales stance. That is why selling expenses are usually higher in the first quarter. That effect happens in a number of first quarters. Last year, selling expenses over net revenue was close to 10%, which was this quarter's number. In the fourth quarter, it was 4%, and at the end of the year, it was about 8%. This year, we should be at the same level. It's about seasonality than anything else, really.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Mariangela Castro with Itaú BBA.
Hello, good morning.
I'd like to know more about the decrease in net revenue this quarter. Was it related to the POC method in any specific project? Is it just related to the evolution of the construction? What are you going to do to increase the net revenue in the coming quarters? How do you see this indicator developing?
Good morning, Mariangela. This is Miguel. Actually, the POC was good. It was actually the highest amount that we have ever had. If you look at our past revenue, it was R$ 1.5 billion, and the difference that happened right now was just the increase in construction and also the recognition of launches. We had many of those this quarter because the fourth quarter was a very strong quarter in terms of launches.
Now, looking forward, if we look at the past 12 months, the sales that will be recognized by consolidation accounted for R$ 10.6 billion, and the accounting revenue was R$ 8.4 billion. That gap is related to the launch volume. Our average POC decreased. That is a symptom, quote unquote, of the growth. With time, the revenue will increase, and our backlog revenue increased by over R$ 2 billion year on year. That is basically that. That is related to the high sales and launch volumes. That revenue has not been recognized in our result yet. It is going to happen over the year. The revenue is in line with our expectations. Indeed, we have the position for cancellations in R$ 113 million, slightly higher than usual, reducing the net revenue for the quarter. The R$ 113 million did not impact the P&L. The impact on the P&L was R$ 31 million.
But that will be recognized back in our inventory. Excluding that effect, the revenue is in line with our expectations.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Mr. Jorel Guillotty with Goldman Sachs.
Good morning. I have two questions. The first one is about CashMe. You said that CashMe was a significant part of your financial results, R$ 58 million- R$ 59 million. I would like to know where that came from. Is CashMe performing better than your expectations? What do you expect for CashMe in the next 12-18 months? The second question is about your ROE. You said that it came to 20.9% this quarter over the last 12 months. In the quarter, it was 14%. When you think about your ROE, do you think it should be kept at 20% throughout 2025? Thank you.
Hello, Jorel. How's it going?
CashMe is going according to our expectations. We expect it to generate R$ 100 million in the year. Again, this is a niche market, a small one. We do not expect to double its profit in the short term. It should grow by 10%-15% per year, but we should not expect more than that. The ROE should be 17%-18% this year and R$ 100 million in profit. Now, Cyrela's ROE, we hope and work to get the 20%. If we keep our launch pipeline and if we sell according to our plans, it should be 20%. It should not be close to 14% or 15%. It should be closer to 20%. Again, we need to launch and sell and see what happens. We reached 18%-19%, and that is where we want to stay, not go back to 15%.
If we sell well, I think we can do it.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Mr. Marcelo Motta with J.P. Morgan.
Hello, good morning. The first question is, we've seen a number of great announcements in the low-income segment. Do you think we're going to hear more good news? I don't know. What do you think is going to happen? Do you think we're going to see more good news, or have we peaked already? I would also like to know more about the productivity. Are you using the six-month period that you have to deliver the projects?
To address your first question about low income, the low income segment, the players that operate in this segment will be able to answer that question better than we are. We are very small in that segment. We are in this game for the long run.
We like the segment as well, and little by little, we are going to grow in the segment as well. I do not know, really. I think the situation is good, and it should continue to be good for a while. The second question is about labor, right? We are not going to use, we are not using the six-month period. We can use it in some projects, but our average is much lower than that. Labor is a chronic pain in Brazil. Our average term is very low, much lower than that, and it is going to continue like that. We do not want to ever use that period of six months because our company has a very strong reputation. We have contractors that have been with us for a long time.
We are very used to working in this context, and we do not think it is going to be chaotic. It is a chronic pain, but it is manageable.
Okay, thank you.
The next question comes from Mr. Ygor Altero with XP.
Hello, good morning. My first question is about production funding, considering the funding scarcity with savings accounts and growing rates. Are the banks more selective now in picking players like Cyrela to provide funding to? The second question is about the second phase in the Jockey project. How is demand like for this project right now?
Hello, Ygor. The Jockey project was according to our expectations. We are very happy about the results there. I am not going to give you details about the two towers, but it is exceeding our expectations. We are very happy and excited about how it has been developing.
Ygor, this is Miguel about funding.
Indeed, the rates increased a lot since the beginning of the year. Many banks changed their strategy, focusing more on individuals to the detriment of corporations. Cyrela has a much better risk, credit risk than competitors. Also, our project performance is a lot higher, a lot better than the competition. That puts us in a good position to get the best conditions in the market. That is a positive factor that favors us in terms of competition. Indeed, the rates have increased, and that's going to have an impact on results going forward.
Okay, thank you.
This concludes the Q&A session for today. Now, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Raphael Horn for his closing remarks.
Thank you very much for your presence, your attention.
We're going to continue to work hard to get another good year as we did in 2024. See you next time.
This concludes Cyrela's 1Q25 earnings call. If you have any questions, please contact the IR team at ri@cyrela.com.br. Thank you very much. Have a good day.