I would like to inform all parties that today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. I will now hand it over to you, Mr. Amit Bhalla.
Thank you very much, and hello everyone. Welcome to our Q1 revenues release. I'm joined here by Hilary Maxson, our CFO. We'll go through a short presentation that you should already have seen, and then we'll move it on to questions. I might just make a reference to, as always, to slide number two, which is the usual disclaimer. With that, I'll hand the floor to Hilary.
Thanks, Amit, and good afternoon, everyone. Happy to be here with you today to comment on our Q1 2025 revenues and to update you on our expectations for the rest of the year. Starting with slide three, I'm happy to report another strong quarter with sales of $9.3 billion. In Energy Management, we continued with double-digit growth in revenues, up 10% for the quarter, and we continue to see strong demand, particularly in Data Center and infrastructure, but not only, driven by trends in electrification and digitization. In Industrial Automation, we were close to flat for the quarter, with sales impacted by seasonality at AVEVA, and we continue to see signs of turnaround in demand in Discrete.
Overall, we were up 7.4% organic in sales, reflecting our strong portfolio positioning tied to structural growth trends, plus the benefits we have from our multi-hub setup, our diversification across geographies, and our business models. In terms of business models, in products, which reflects our shorter-cycle business and sales through partners, we were up + 1%, primarily driven by volume and not price, despite a fairly sizable working-day impact for us in Q1. In Energy Management, demand and sales for products remain solid, with the exception of residential, where uncertainty and higher interest rates are impacting consumers. Our systems business continues with strong double-digit growth, driven by continued strong demand trends, particularly in Data Center and infrastructure. Software and services was + 5% for the quarter, with reported revenues at AVEVA impacted by timing and its continued transition to subscription. ARR at AVEVA was + 14%.
In energy management software, where our pace towards subscription is a bit more measured, we saw strong growth at both ETAP and RIB. Digital and field services were together up high single-digit, tied to strong demand in our suite of EcoCare offerings. Turning now to our own sustainability performance. As you know, this is our final year of our current Schneider Sustainability Impact Program, and we aim to finish with a high achievement of almost 9 out of 10 progression versus some very aggressive goals we set for ourselves at the end of 2020. Of note, in Q1 is a 12-point improvement in reduction of CO2 emissions at our top 1,000 suppliers in North America, driven by the deployment of energy efficiency solutions and electricity sourcing from renewables.
I'll also note our intensity building in Grenoble, France, where we've deployed our own solutions, achieved an LEED Platinum certification for becoming one of the world's most sustainable buildings. On this slide, we've highlighted just a few of our many customer examples from Q1. The first two are demonstrating the continued traction we have with our ADMS, or Advanced Distribution Management System software, providing real-time network monitoring and control. One customer is an airport that many of you likely know in Amsterdam, and the second, a grid operator in Italy. The third example is a customer you also likely know, ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, where we'll provide medium-voltage switchgear and PDUs, as well as ETAP's digital modeling software to ensure accurate electrical data at the beginning of the project.
Getting into more details on our Q1 performance, while we do not usually report on our orders, here we are giving you a sense of the order trends we have seen both year-over-year and in the Q1 2025 versus Q4 of 2024, as I know there have been a lot of questions about what is happening in some of our end markets and segments. First, in Data Center, we continue to see strong double-digit demand with continued strength in North America and East Asia. This strong growth trend already starts to include adjustments made by certain customers and is indicative, we believe, of the true underlying trend for data centers, which we expect to continue aligned with the expectations we shared at our Capital Markets Day and again in 2024.
In building, we do see some weakness in residential, confirming the potential trend we mentioned in February and driven by low consumer confidence and sustained higher interest rates, particularly in Europe and North America, as well as continued weakness in China. Non-residential building continues relatively stronger. In industry, where we sell the full portfolio of Schneider , we do continue to see positive trends in manufacturing and OEM, whereas mining and energy and chemical continue fairly weak, in part driven by lower oil prices and uncertainty. In infrastructure, really power and grid a lot for us, we continue to see strong demand trends. Overall, we remain in a primarily strong demand environment for electrification and digitization, with positive trends in industry. Of course, we do recognize we're now in an environment of heightened uncertainty, and I'll address that in our expected trends later in the call.
Turning now to the details of our Q1 revenues. We finished the quarter at EUR 9.3 billion in revenue, up 7% organic year-over-year, with a particularly strong contribution from systems, as I mentioned prior. In terms of geographies, we had North America as a continued strong double-digit contributor, driven by Data Center and Data Center services. Asia-Pacific is at close to double-digit growth, with continued strong growth in India, where both of the two brands we mentioned at our India Investor Day are driving strong double-digit growth. We have updated in the appendix of this presentation the size of our total India business in 2024, as well as the piece we today own at 65%, together with Temasek as a 35% partner. India is now solidly our third-largest country. We returned to growth in China, up low single-digit for the quarter in both businesses.
Western Europe shifted to negative, and rest of the world continued with solid growth against a strong base of comparison. Foreign exchange impacts were positive for the quarter, driven by strength in the U.S. dollar. Without taking a view on where rates may go in the future, based on today's situation, we would estimate a full-year impact on our top line of -EUR 1.15 billion-EUR 1.25 billion, with estimated impacts on our adjusted EBITDA margin of around - 40 basis points due to the significant depreciation of the U.S. dollar, also impacting currencies related or tied to the U.S. dollar, and the depreciation of the Chinese yuan, all of that being translational effects. Turning now to Q1 revenues by business and geography. Energy Management was up 10% organic for the quarter to EUR 7.6 billion.
We saw continued double-digit growth in North America, up 17%, with growth across all three countries and continued strong double-digit growth in the U.S. due to strong demand in Data Center and in services. In products, the picture is a bit more mixed, with continued weakness in demand in residential due to uncertainty and high interest rates, with non-residential building relatively stronger. Western Europe was down 3% organic, with demand for products impacted by weakness in residential, with relatively stronger performance in non-residential building. System sales were impacted by the delays in data center projects we've been mentioning for quite a few quarters in this geography due to issues in permitting and some design and go-to-market discussions. Asia-Pacific was up 13%, with China up low single-digit, driven by continued acceleration in data center and growth in new energy.
India was up strong double-digit, with continued strong demand dynamics across end markets. Australia was up double-digit, driven by demand in data centers, with some weakness in residential. The rest of the region delivered double-digit growth, driven by projects in Data Center and infrastructure. Rest of the world was up 3% against a strong base of comparison, with growth primarily driven by South America. Turning now to industrial automation, revenues were down 1% organic to $1.8 billion, impacted by timing and the transition to subscription at AVEVA, and continued weakness in Discrete. We did see a strong sequential improvement versus Q4 in Discrete, particularly in China and key countries in Europe. North America was flat, with strong growth at AVEVA offset by continued weakness in Discrete, although we do start to see some improving demand trends in the Discrete markets there.
Western Europe was down 5%, impacted by timing of bookings at AVEVA. Discrete markets were close to flat and sequentially improved versus Q4, particularly in Germany. Asia-Pacific was down 1%, with China up low single-digit, supported by continued growth in some early-cycle products and a return to growth in OEM. The rest of Asia-Pacific was down due to software and process, with Discrete automation flat due to growth in Australia. Rest of the world was up 5%, supported by process and in software. Before I move to our expectations for the remainder of the year, I wanted to mention we closed the Motivair transaction, a great addition to our Data Center offering, as we continue to be convinced of the significant demand opportunity for liquid cooling, and we start to see that in Motivair's expectations for 2025.
Plus, we closed the joint venture with StarCharge, through which we'll address the market in Europe for EV charging and storage. In terms of capital allocation, our priorities remain unchanged. Moving now to slide 12 with an update on our market dynamics. First, despite the heightened uncertainty, we expect continued market demand to drive growth in 2025, with contributions across our end markets and from all four geographies, despite weakness in residential buildings. We also expect continued strong demand for systems led by Data Center and infrastructure projects. We continue to expect a demand recovery in Discrete automation, with sales growth weighted towards the H2. In software and services, no change in our expectations there, with expected double-digit growth in ARR at AVEVA and strong growth in services. We already gave you information regarding our supply footprint in North America at our full-year call.
Nothing's changed there, and we're already taking commercial and supply chain actions to counter the impacts of tariffs. Recognizing the heightened uncertainty, we're focused on ensuring we remain agile and take responsible actions to manage our profitability, our capital investments, and our cash flows. With this backdrop, we're reiterating our full-year 2025 guidance of growth in our adjusted EBITDA of 10%-15% organic, driven by revenue growth of between 7% and 10%, and adjusted EBITDA margin improvement of 50-80 basis points. I will mention we do expect to see strong seasonality in our free cash flows this year, partly as normal, but also impacted by a payment of the EUR 200 million fine imposed by the French Competition Authority disclosed in Q3 2024. We're appealing that case, but we're required to make full payment upfront.
No change to the expectation I mentioned in February that our cash conversion ratio will trend towards 100% for the full year. Given the tariffs, we also expect to be back to more normal seasonality in our profitability, with higher margins in the second half. With that, I'll turn the call back to Amit for the Q&A.
All right. Thank you very much, Hilary. Let's move to the Q&A. We'll keep it to one question, please, per analyst. Let's get to the first question, please, operator.
If you'd like to ask a question, please press star and one. To withdraw your question, press star and two. The first question is from Alasdair Leslie of Bernstein.
Oh, yeah. Thank you. Good afternoon. Energy management weaker than expected in Western Europe. Just maybe if you can elaborate more on Data Centers specifically there. You cite several factors behind sort of, I guess, a negative impact on demand. Given some of those seem to be more structural in nature, I think you flag power availability, AI design. Realistically, how quickly does that turn? How quickly can you overcome those issues and return to growth there? Thank you.
For me in Western Europe, probably nothing new on Data Center. We've mentioned for the past multiple quarters, probably even a bit more than a year, that we see some delays, particularly associated with permitting, associated with energy, electricity connections, this type of thing, and a few other factors, like you mentioned. Not a big change for us, including in the Q1. We do expect Data Center growth to happen in Europe. I think it's something that the governments are focused on, for example. At the moment, that delay continues, again, somewhat as expected. In terms of where we were a little bit lower than expectation, I would say residential building, but a bit prefaced in the full-year call.
Thanks, Alasdair. Next question, please.
Next question. It is from Simon Toennessen of Jefferies.
Yes. Good evening, Hilary and Amit. I've got one on your guidance, Hilary. After this Q1, you clearly need to see an acceleration to reach the midpoint or even the high end of your organic guide when Energy Management is facing a 400 basis points tougher comp, I think, in the second half. Can you elaborate a bit more on how you're seeing the sort of the major building blocks at a time when it seems resi and process markets are weaker and Discrete, I guess, not strong enough yet to offset? Is your guidance base case entirely driven by AA growth improving in H2, i.e., just based on a cyclical pickup, or do you see any other drivers, for example, in Energy Management where growth could improve versus the Q1? Thank you.
For us, a couple of points there. First, there is some timing in the Q1. Of course, w e would have thought about that from a guidance scenario standpoint already. In terms of what gives us confidence for the full year, first and foremost, probably our pipeline and backlog. I think we continue to see good progression in terms of pipeline. We also have the backlog in front of us.
Those are sort of underpinning the guidance that we gave at the full year and reiterating today. We also continue to see the positive signs in Discrete that we talked about on our full-year call. We do expect, like I said, to see a pickup in sales there in the H2. Of course, we do not know perfectly the size of that uptick, but we built already the three-point guidance range in order to reflect different scenarios.
Thanks, Simon. Next question.
The next question is from Jonathan Mounsey of BNP Paribas Exane.
Hi. Good evening. Thanks for letting me ask the question. Maybe on the tariff side, I think there's some helpful slides there in the back talking about 83% region-to-region sourcing in the U.S. and North America, rather, and hope to go to 90%. Obviously, none of us expected the last time we spoke that tariffs on China would be 145%. With that kind of elevated level of tariff, it feels like even if only a small part of your sourcing comes from China, it's probably going to require a meaningful price increase to recover the headwind. What have you got planned there? Give us any feeling on what has to happen to pricing to recover the margin, and will there be a lag around that? I did mention that maybe margins would be higher in the second half.
Is that purely seasonal, or is it somewhat linked to this? Just a very short one, group orders and the backlog. Are we still growing the backlog? Are orders still ahead of sales? That would be really helpful as well.
Okay. Quite a few questions. Maybe I'll take the last one first, which is, are we growing the backlog? Do we have a positive book- to- bill in Q1? I think there we can say yes. In terms of tariffs, that's right. Last time we gave the 83%, and we were a little bit more focused on the Mexico tariffs, whereas today, I think that we continue to have a pass on the USMCA tariffs that are there. Post the liberation day, and assuming everything remains as it is today, so all those tariffs remain in place, the impact is still in probably just the hundreds of millions at the group level. We're already taking commercial and supply chain actions, like I mentioned, to offset this and protect our profitability.
That said, no different than when we had the inflation in front of us, for example, in 2023. It takes a bit of time for the tariffs flow in day one, and then it takes a bit of, well, post-inventory, etc. It takes a bit of time on the pricing side. We may have some timing, whereas overall, over quarters, we'll protect in full our profitability.
Thanks, Jon. Next question, please.
The next question is from Daniela Costa of Goldman Sachs.
Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. I just wanted to follow up on capital allocation, and now you just completed Motivair. What are sort of the main areas of focus on how you think about M&A versus buyback at the moment?
I mentioned no real change in terms of capital allocation. We're focused, obviously, first on organic, then inorganic, and then share buyback, probably, to make it very simple. Yes, we're excited we completed Motivair in terms of where we would focus our portfolio on any potential M&A. I think looking at the things that we've done more recently, like Motivair, where we find an opportunity to accelerate from a technology standpoint, what we have in terms of offer to the customers in an exciting demand environment, that's the type of thing that we're always looking for. You can take a look at we double down in some cases in geographies like India in the past years, or we continue to look in digital, of course. We've been interested in digital and software as well.
Those are the types of categories that I could point to, just looking at examples of what we've done in the past. I think those are the same types of things that we would anticipate doing in the future.
Thank you, Daniela. Next question.
The next question is from Gaël De Bray of Deutsche Bank.
Good afternoon. Thanks very much. Can I have two quick ones, please? Firstly, in which countries specifically did you see the greater than expected sequential deterioration in residential buildings? I mean, any news specifically on the Indian joint venture with Temasek? Specifically also, could you provide maybe an indication on the size of the new joint venture in Europe in the EV charging segment? Thank you.
Okay. Sure. In terms of where I think you can actually see quite a bit of detail in our press release around where we have some weakness in residential. The two areas that I would point to would be Western Europe and North America. Again, a bit as prefaced in the full-year call, where we said that we started to see some potential weakness in demand there. In terms of capital allocation, no news to share today on India. We have the good partnership there with Temasek. They've actually been a great partner to us. We're at 65%. They're at 35% for one of the key legal entities that we have in India. Of course, when we entered into the transaction, it was clear that they would look to exit at some point.
Of course, I think that this investment has probably been doing well for them the same way that it's been doing well for us. We don't think of it as an investment, obviously, but it's doing well. We'll let you know in the right time frame whether we have any potential that we would look at how they would take that exit. We did mention on the India Investor Day that we probably wouldn't be terribly excited to do an IPO of that business.
When and if they choose to exit, we'll take a look ourselves and then see if there's other options from an exit standpoint for them. The size of the JV with StarCharge, this is a fairly nascent market. It' s not a large size starting today, but we think there is quite a bit of potential in the EV charging inverters and storage market, and we are excited to have them as a partner.
All right. Thanks, Gaël. Next question, and let's keep it to one, please.
The next question is from James Moore of Redburn Atlantic.
Give it to one. Could I just clarify on China? Are we talking how much percentage of the U.S. businesses, Local, China, and Mexico? I was assuming 75% for China, 25% for Mexico. Could you just comment on April orders as to whether in the last three weeks you've seen any significant change in market dynamics post-tariff?
Sorry. You're asking in terms of exposure to imports into the U.S., which I think is your first question. We're 83% North America for North America, but we caveated on the last call that that does include a good portion of imports into the U.S. from Mexico, but most of that in those special tax and trade zones that we have today. Of the remaining 17% that comes from other geographies outside of North America, we mentioned that there's no single particular contributor there. It's across quite a few countries, including a small bit China, a small bit India, a small bit Philippines, these types of areas. We've put all of that together, and that's the impact in terms of tariffs for us that I'd quantified not exactly, but I said it's several hundreds of millions for us at the total level in terms of North America.
All right. Next question, please.
The next question is from George Featherstone of Barclays.
Hi. Thanks for taking the question. I just want data centers. I wondered if you could just help us with how orders in that segment performed year-over-year. Some of your peers have cited mid-teens growth, and I just wondered how you compared to that level of activity, please.
Here I mentioned that we continue to see strong double-digit growth, both in demand, which you can basically impute as orders, as well as sales. We also continue to see strong double-digit growth in this end market.
Thanks. Next question.
The next question is from William Mackie of Kepler Cheuvreux.
Yeah. Good evening. Thanks for fitting me in. My question relates to the flexibility to price the backlog. You're implying your backlog is close to a new record. In the event that some of the tariffs and other factors create greater inflation within the cost structures for those contracts, what ability do you have to go back to customers and reset or reprice some of the backlog to mitigate the potential margin headwinds?
First, I'll say that we've taken everything into account into the guidance that we've given or the reiteration of the guidance that we've given. We do expect to be able to take commercial actions in order to protect our profitability, including we included into many commercial contracts the ability to reprice in the case of tariffs. It's not like this was a new item that came up, I would say, over the past only months or something like that. Maybe the magnitude was different than the world expected, but the concept itself was not new and was discussed quite a bit in the U.S. presidential elections throughout 2024. We do anticipate that we'll go back to the backlog and either automatically or through some discussions reprice a decent portion of it.
Thanks, Will. Next question.
The next question is from Max Yates of Morgan Stanley.
Thank you. Just sorry to go back on tariffs. You've talked a lot about kind of the finished product that you export from outside of the U.S. into the U.S. I guess what I was really curious about is some of your competitors, we kind of all know who I'm talking about, Legrand, have said that of their North America supply chain, around half of the components that they buy to manufacture in the U.S. come from outside of the U.S., including quite a major portion of China. I guess my real question is, is there an impact from buying components and shipping them into the U.S. where you have to pay, obviously, sort of tariffs on that and potentially higher prices for components? If not, do you think your competitive position versus someone like Legrand will give you an advantage and possibly an opportunity to take share?
I guess you're not that differently positioned to, say, an Eaton. I'm just curious, A, on the competition, and maybe B, on I'm surprised given what others are saying that you don't have a reasonable amount of components shipped in for your North America production.
Okay. In terms of what we're looking at in imports, I think we are looking at everything that we bring in, if that's what you're saying. In terms of our own supplier network having issues within their own production and their own components, this is something that we've done our best to take a look at. We don't see anything in particular that wouldn't be covered, again, by the guidance that we reiterated today. Versus competition, to be honest, I'm not entirely aware of exactly what Legrand said, but in general, we feel that versus the large competitors, which for us would probably be others, we're probably not so different.
Thank you, Max. Next question, please.
The next question is from Jeff Sprague of Vertical Research.
Thank you. Good day, everyone. Just on the machine OEM commentary, I wonder what end markets and use end markets, if any, that you're actually seeing a visible change in demand versus just kind of the end of inventory liquidation. Does any particular end use demand look like it's turning?
For us, the key customer segment that we generally look at is the OEM segment themselves. Within that, we start to see a good turnaround in general, if you want to look at lower segments, both sequentially. In some places like China, we actually start to see, I'd mentioned, some positivity even into the sales side. In general, just machine builders, we start to see decent positivity. We do associate that in some ways with the end of the flood of additional inventory that was in there, but now in our mind is reflective of the underlying demand that we've actually seen for some time, but that was not reflected in orders or sales because of the inventory that was sitting in the system.
We think that that inventory is largely finished and that now we're back to reflecting in general underlying demand. That said, of course, it's against a low base, but that's where we start to see actually green shoots quite across the board in China and particular countries in Western Europe in terms of demand and machine builders.
Thanks, Jeff. Next question, please.
The next question is from Jonathan Day of HSBC.
Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. I was just wondering if you could comment on in terms of the order trends, whether you've seen any pre-ordering in Q1 ahead of tariffs embedded in those order trends or whether they're all, if you like sort of underlying organic reflective of their market developments. Thanks.
As of now, we don't see anything in the Q1 that we think was associated with pre-ordering tied to tariffs. We don't actually see any impacts today, even today, in our own pipeline and expectations in terms of demand and speaking with customers. We just expect with the heightened uncertainty, which I'd mentioned a couple of times, that of course, we were trying to anticipate different scenarios. No, we didn't see any particular pre-ordering. Even today, we don't see any big differences in terms of pipeline opportunities and expected demand.
Next question. Thank you.
The next question is from Delphine Brault of ODDO.
Yes. Thanks. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. How did your Q2 activity start? The first weeks of the quarter, did you see any inflection, either positive or negative?
Again, nothing I would really call out here. We do not see anything particularly different than the trends that I already outlined in the Q1. We do not see any impacts so far to our own pipeline, for example, associated with, let's say, the heightened uncertainty post-Liberation Day.
Thanks, Delphine. Next question.
The next question is from Martin Wilkie of Citi.
Yeah. Thank you. Good evening. It's Martin. A question just coming back to software. When you outlined the outlook at the capital markets, you obviously talked about the phasing of SaaS and how that could obviously impact the earlier part of the four-year planning period. Could you let us know where we are in that process? Obviously, it's still a drag this quarter, but does that get less of a drag as the year progresses? Should we expect the sales growth to trend up towards the ARR as the year goes on, or is it a much later timescale when we can think about software in terms of reported organic beginning to accelerate? Thank you.
We mentioned that it was in 2027 that we'd primarily be outside of the impacts of the transition to subscription. That said, I think in this Q1 in particular, we also spoke to timing. It is not just the transition to subscription. We also have some timing issues, I would say, in the Q1 for software. Into 2027, we would expect to start to see very little impact from the transition.
Thanks, Martin. We'll probably take a couple more. Next question, please.
The next question is from Alexander Virgo of Bank of America.
Yeah. Thanks very much. Good evening, Hilary, Amit. I wondered if you could just talk a little bit about the sequential development in Europe and how we should think about that as we layer that in, I guess, over the coming quarters because + 7% in Q4 to - 3% in Q1 is a big move. I'm just wondering, I guess, I'm wondering how big an impact that Resi business really has had and how much of it is data centers being pushed to the right and at what point we might expect that to normalize or come through into the back end of the year. Thank you.
Sure. I think a couple of things there. There is a differential in baseline, I think, in Europe throughout the year. You will see that a bit in, for example, Q4 of 2024 versus Q1 of 2025. There is an impact from residential, but we also have some timing with various projects. I mentioned Data Center, b ut that is not the only timing I think I would necessarily call out if we are looking at just Western Europe. I did mention that we do expect that all four of our regions will contribute to growth for the full year. That is our expectation in terms of forecasts, including taking into account quite a few scenarios.
Thank you.
Thanks, Alex. Let's take one more.
Thank you, sir. The last question is from Ben Uglow of Oxcap.
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. I guess, can we just step back and look very, very high level at the kind of customer conversations that you're having? I think the press release kind of mentions on the system side one or two delayed investment decisions. I guess, Hilary, it doesn't sound as if things have massively changed despite the Liberation Day tariffs. Can you just give us a bit of color from your conversations? Is it just business as usual, and we should expect the second quarter to look pretty much like the first quarter? Is that a fair assumption?
I'd mentioned a couple of times, indeed, we don't actually see anything particularly different in the business that I would call out aside from we called out some weakness in residential. That's the only area that we would call out that we actually see a difference from a business standpoint where we actually see that conversations are different, where we see there's not much pipeline in residential, but where we see a bit of a difference. The rest, where we do have quite a lot of pipeline, for example, it's true that we don't yet see an impact post-Liberation Day. Now, we took into account many scenarios like we did on the full year because we recognize an environment of uncertainty.
Like you said, taking a step back, at the moment, there's nothing particular to call out to in our mind associated with the Liberation Day, aside from, of course, the commercial actions and the supply chain actions that we'll take as a company and that we've talked through already a few times.
Interesting. Thank you.
Thank you, Ben. I think on that note, we'll probably stop the call. Thank you all for the after office hour time that you spent with us, and we are available in the coming days to discuss further. We stop the call here. Thank you all very much.
This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may disconnect at this time.