Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to Bayer's Investor and Analyst Conference Call on the Q1 2022 Results. Throughout today's recorded presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. If any participant has difficulty hearing the conference, please press the star key followed by zero on your telephone for operator assistance. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Oliver Maier, Head of Investor Relations of Bayer AG. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, Stuart. Good afternoon, and thanks everybody for joining us today. I'd like to welcome all of you for our Q1 2022 conference call. With me on the call today are Werner Baumann, our CEO, and Wolfgang Nickl, our CFO. The businesses are represented by the responsible management board members. Werner will begin today's call, as usual, with an overview of the key developments in the Q1 . Wolfgang will then cover the performance of our business as well as the outlook for 2022 before we open up the Q&A session. I would like to start the call today by drawing your attention to the cautionary language that is included in our safe harbor statement, as well as in all the materials that we have distributed today. With that, Werner, I hand it over to you.
Thank you, Oliver, and good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. It's my pleasure to welcome you to our conference call for the Q1 . Before we look into our business performance, let me start with commenting on the Russian invasion in Ukraine, its implications, and how we as a company deal with it. With the war in Ukraine, living up to our social and humanitarian responsibility is one of our top priorities. We continue to ensure the supply of life-saving medicines and agricultural products to the civilian population. At the request of the Ukrainian government, we have donated both medical and seed products. We have delivered antibiotics for 27,000 people in Ukraine.
These days, we are providing more than 1,000 smallholder farmers in Ukraine with 41,000 bags of corn seed free of charge, which will hopefully contribute about 180,000 metric tons to the corn harvest. We have also provided monetary contributions to aid organizations and help refugees to find shelter. The implication of the Russian invasion into Ukraine go far beyond. Both countries play a major role for global food supply, specifically into the world's poorest regions. Food security is already under massive threat, specifically in the Middle East and Africa, and prices for food are increasing. As a global leader for agricultural products, right now, we work on securing supply of our products, help maintain global agricultural supply chains, and build on our increasing access to smallholder farmers.
In the longer term, our innovation power will help to make agriculture more productive and sustainable, securing global food supply with less resources. This shows that we at Bayer have a systemic relevance and distinguished responsibility for human health and nutrition these days, even more than ever. Let me now give you a brief status update on litigation. On the glyphosate litigation, we continue to execute our five-point plan. As you know, the U.S. Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General representing the U.S. government to file a brief in the Hardeman case, which we are waiting for. We are prepared for any outcome of the final Supreme Court decision. Regarding the PCB water litigation, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California recently granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreements we announced with the class of municipal entities in June 2020.
We have also reached agreements to resolve cases with the attorneys general of several U.S. states, but still, there are trials scheduled in the upcoming weeks, both in personal injury and environmental cases, including one involving the state of Oregon. Let's now move to our operational performance in the Q1 . We have had a very successful start into the year and achieved excellent growth in sales and earnings, particularly driven by the positive market environment for our Crop Science business. In addition, Consumer Health continued its broad-based growth trajectory, driven by strong demand in nutritionals and recovery of growth rates in the allergy and cold category. Our Pharmaceuticals business continued to increase volumes, particularly for our blockbuster Eylea. Our launch products also continued to perform well. Which brings me to an update on innovation. We made further important progress on our innovation agenda.
For Kerendia, we have received approval to treat adults with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes in the EU and Japan. For NUBEQA, we have submitted applications for the additional indications in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in the U.S., the EU, Japan, and China, and we were delighted to see the U.S. FDA granting priority review last week. With the submissions for this label extension, we have already delivered on one of our key pipeline catalysts for this year. Beginning of April, we also presented positive results for the first phase IIb trial on the safety of asundexian in patients with atrial fibrillation. In the further course of the year, we plan to decide on phase III for our Factor XI program and expect phase III data for the Eylea 8 mg dose, as well as the interim analysis of our BlueRock phase I Parkinson's program, BRT-DA01.
Looking ahead, there are certainly a few variables from a macro perspective for the remainder of the year. The COVID pandemic already led to stretched global supply chains, to which we are now seeing elevated pressure from the war in Ukraine. As for most other companies, one of our major focus areas is energy security, both for our own operations as well within our supply chain. We work intensively on the supply security of our production sites and develop different scenarios and action plans for reduced gas availability and potential disruptions at supplier level. On the cost side, we continue to see significant cost increases in materials and services, which is a common theme across countries and industries. As outlined in our full year guidance and the conference call, we are countering these effects with continued cost and pricing management.
On the macro variables, we will certainly have a clearer picture as the year progresses, and we'll keep you updated accordingly. Overall, let me re-emphasize that we had a very, very good start into the year, and we are also optimistic for full year 2022. Of course, the environment continues to be quite volatile. From today's perspective, we are very confident that we will achieve our full year ambitions. With it, I'll hand it over to you, Wolfgang, for more details on our business performance and the underlying assumptions for our outlook.
Yeah. Thank you, Werner. Hello, ladies and gentlemen. I will now walk you through our business performance in the Q1 , followed by our financial outlook for the full year 2022. In the Q1 , we substantially grew group sales by 14% on a currency and portfolio adjusted basis to EUR 14.6 billion. The biggest contributor was our Crop Science business. Our group EBITDA before special items reached EUR 5.3 billion, representing a 28% increase year- over- year. The EBITDA margin before special items came in 250 basis points above prior year at 35.9%. Let me briefly comment on the foreign exchange effects that we saw in the quarter. Whereas sales include a material tailwind of EUR 529 million, the impact on EBITDA is less pronounced at EUR 67 million.
The main reason is the appreciation of currencies in countries where we have a relatively higher cost footprint, like the U.S., compared to the depreciation of currencies for countries with a lower footprint like Turkey. While positive in absolute terms, this leads to a margin dilution of 90 basis points. You will also see these effects in the divisional results, however, in different magnitudes, depending on the respective business footprint and FX exposure. Core earnings per share reached EUR 3.53 in the Q1 , which is a plus of EUR 0.94 compared to previous year, driven by the strong Crop Science and Consumer Health performance. The core financial result was roughly at previous year level, with −EUR 419 million compared to −EUR 385 million last year.
Our core tax rate came in at 22.1%, versus 24.3% in the Q1 of last year, due to one-time benefits from revaluation of deferred taxes in the United States. For the full year, we continue to expect a core tax rate of around 23% as guided. Our free cash flow amounted to -EUR 1.2 billion in the Q1 of 2022, compared with -EUR 3.2 billion in 2021. The improvement is largely driven by lower settlement payments for glyphosate and Assure of EUR 470 million in the Q1 this year, compared to EUR 2.2 billion last year. Increased top line, particularly from our Crop Science business, led to the related accounts receivable build up, which will be collected in the subsequent quarters.
Consequently, and as expected, our net financial debt increased to EUR 34.5 billion in the Q1 due to free cash flow seasonality as well as the strength of the US dollar. Let's now look into the performance of our three businesses. Our crop division had an outstanding Q1 and achieved sales of EUR 8.4 billion. This represents a currency and portfolio adjusted sales growth of 22%. Approximately three quarters of this growth is related to price and roughly one quarter is coming from higher volumes. If we look specifically at the segments, herbicides were the single largest contributor, with growth of 60% on a currency and portfolio adjusted basis. Around 75% of this growth came from strong price increases for our glyphosate-based products, and the remainder came mostly from volume expansion.
Our corn seeds and traits franchise grew by 10% currency and portfolio adjusted, with growth in all regions, mostly from price. Volumes also increased, except in North America, where planted acres are expected to decrease. Sales in soybean seeds and traits were on the prior year level at +1% currency and portfolio adjusted. In North America, we realized stronger pricing as more growers continue to trade up to our newest XtendFlex soybeans. However, this was offset by a volume decline in Latin America following the previously announced discontinuation of our Argentine soy business, which had a minor effect on our bottom line. Our fungicides business expanded by 19%, mainly related to higher volumes in every region. Particularly, we saw early demand as growers seek to secure the supply in uncertain times.
From a profitability perspective, the substantial pricing growth in herbicides as well as in corn and soy led to an all-time high margin of 43.4%, an improvement of 660 basis points year-over-year. EBITDA before special items grew by 50% to EUR 3.7 billion, with improved pricing and efficiency measures more than compensating for a cost inflation impact of approximately EUR 200 million in the Q1 . Foreign exchange effects led to a tailwind of EUR 98 million year-over-year. Currency and portfolio adjusted sales for our pharma division grew by 3%, mainly driven by continued volume expansion. Our blockbuster drug Eylea continued its strong trajectory with 14% currency and portfolio adjusted growth, particularly gaining market share in growing markets like Europe and China.
Furthermore, the ongoing launch of Eylea pre-filled syringes and the recovery from COVID-19 restrictions added to the top line growth. For pharma overall, we see a slightly negative price trend of -1% year-over-year, particularly driven by price reductions from volume-based procurement for Xarelto in China. This led to a total Xarelto sales decline of 5% in the Q1 on a currency and portfolio adjusted basis. Our new prostate cancer drug, NUBEQA, showed continued strong rollout momentum and achieved sales of EUR 76 million. While new patient starts and market share gains in the approved non-metastatic prostate cancer indication drove sales in the Q1 , we are already preparing for the launch in the metastatic cancer setting.
Top line growth in the Q1 also benefited from the ongoing strong performance of our radiology business and continued its recovery from COVID-19 related restrictions in the prior year. On the bottom line, EBITDA before special items for our pharma division decreased by 7% to EUR 1.4 billion, translating into a margin of 30% compared to 34.3% in the Q1 of 2021. Key driver for this development were our continued investments into innovation and future growth, specifically for the Kerendia launch and the ongoing rollout of NUBEQA and Verquvo. In addition, higher R&D expenses related to the termination of pipeline projects, as well as the non-recurring EUR 52 million proceeds in Q1 2021 linked to the sale of a priority review voucher.
Due to the regional setup and foreign exchange exposure of our pharma business, FX changes resulted in a headwind of EUR 34 million or a 160 basis point margin dilution year-on-year, mainly driven by the US dollar. We close out the divisional updates with our consumer health business. Sales there increased 17% on a currency and portfolio adjusted basis, with continued growth across regions and categories and cycling over a soft prior year quarter. Our allergy and cold category showed a 39% rebound after very low demand for cough and cold products due to COVID-19 restrictions in the Q1 of last year. Nutritionals continued the strong growth trajectory backed by the general preventive health trends and achieved 15% growth. Our product line extension, the Bepanthen Dry Skin, contributed to dermatology growth of 12%.
Partially, we also saw demand shifts into the Q1 driven by price-induced buying behaviors across categories and COVID-19 related insecurity on future supply. Our EBITDA before special items for Consumer Health increased by 33% to EUR 388 million, with a substantial margin expansion of 240 basis points to 25.7%. Strong top line growth, continuous spending discipline, and price management could offset inflationary cost pressures. The Q1 also included a divestment income for the sale of a small non-strategic brand. Year-over-year foreign exchange effects led to a marginal tailwind in earnings, but a 30 basis point margin dilution. Let's now look at our guidance for the full year.
As already mentioned by Werner, we are off to a strong start with very good growth and earnings progression, and we are optimistic for the year. Still, there is a lot of uncertainty and volatility we'll have to deal with, be it the Ukraine war, COVID-19, or the supply and energy-related challenges we might face. Against that backdrop, we maintain our full year operational guidance at this point in time, and we'll review it once we have more visibility. Therefore, the update today is limited to exchange rates. In the light blue column on the right, you see the latest estimate on the currency impact based on month-end exchange rates from March 2022 versus the constant currency scenario. Please also note that our currency adjusted guidance still assumes the divestment by mid-year of the environmental science professional business as going concern.
With that, Oliver, I hand back over to you to start us on the Q&A.
Great. Thanks, Wolfgang. Thanks, Werner for your overview. I think Stuart, we can start right away with the Q&A and open up the lines.
Thank you, Oliver. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll begin the question and answer session. If you have a question, please press the star followed by one on your telephone. If you wish to cancel your request, please press star followed by the two. If you're using speaker equipment today, please lift the handset before making your selections. One moment for the first question, please. First question is from the line of Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you and good morning, everyone. Rodrigo, if I could ask you know, obviously, glyphosate pricing was a big feature, as expected, when we last spoke. At Q4 results, you talked about anticipating probably some correction in pricing in the back half as supply improves and the sort of supply from China was gonna be the big wild card. Could you give us an update on what you're seeing in terms of competitors' production, and what your sort of anticipation is for glyphosate pricing trajectory in the back half of the year?
Thank you, Vincent. Yeah, you are very precise on the discussion that we had on the guidance. 50% of our growth of the Q1 comes from glyphosate. 75% of our herbicide is coming from glyphosate. We see the Q2 is still having a good price as we anticipate, but the second half of the year, we're gonna see a normalization, right? We see an increase of inventory in China. This is what we have in the plan. Of course, we are ready to capture the opportunity that may happen depending on how we monitor that one. We're keeping our plans in place in the market, and hopefully, we can capture more opportunities on the second half, but we plan for a more normalization price for the second half of the year.
Okay. As a follow-up, for the second half of the year as well in the seed business in South America, and I guess in particular in Brazil, where the currency's moved a fair amount, have you already priced the seed for the second half in line with the sort of expectations that you already gave us, or has anything changed on your pricing expectations for Lat Am for the second half in seed?
No, it's already priced and it's in line to what we shared here, Vincent. Just to share with the others here, we plan for this year around 6%-7% price increase on our corn businesses, on our fungicides, insecticides, and that's what we are executing on the market.
Okay. Thanks very much.
Thank you.
Next question is from the line of Pete Verdult from Citigroup. Please go ahead.
Pete with Citigroup. Two questions. Firstly, Werner, Wolfgang, you've effectively delivered most of the 2022 guidance in Q1 alone. You've made some comments about being very optimistic to meeting guidance. The lack of change, is that simply due to being so early in the year and an abundance of caution, or have you seen any worrying signs in terms of volume price trends during Q2? Second question is on asundexian for Stefan.
Realize you can't go into the details or quantitate quantitatively talk about the PACIFIC-Stroke and PACIFIC-AMI data that you've got in-house, but just following and building on to the AF data we all saw at ACC, can you make any qualitative comments on your enthusiasm for the program and how that's changed, and how your ambitions going to phase III have potentially molded as you see more data? Thank you.
All right, Pete. Good morning. I'll answer the first question on guidance and Q1 before I hand it over to Stefan. In brief, of course, we have seen a very, very strong Q1 , and you rightfully point out that, you know, quite a bit of, you know, the earnings progression for the year has already materialized in Q1 . That was also planned. Yeah, we said that we are going to have a very, very strong first half of the year based on the assumptions taken, in particular in crop, with a first half of the year that is going to see strong glyphosate pricing, with, you know, the points that Rodrigo just touched on.
We assumed for our planning a normalization in the second half of the year. It goes without saying that to the extent that these assumptions would be conservative, there would be upside. At the same time, you heard it from me and you also heard it from Wolfgang, there's quite a bit of volatility out there that we see. Hence, we have decided to stay with the guidance that is out there for the time being, and we'll review it as we move further into the year. Let me now hand it over to Stefan.
Hi, Pete. Thanks for the question. Of course, we're excited with the results from the PACIFIC-AF trial. Just as a reminder to everyone, two-thirds of bleeding reduction is something that we feel obviously very, very good about. Also what we've seen from a mode of action, the strong inhibition of factor XIa activity that goes above 90% in the high dose and 80%-90% in the low dose in our dosing studies. You're right. Or I guess you know, we can't conclude efficacy from that. Bleeding is seen in AF patients as today one of the most important side effect, if not the most important side effect that is seen by physicians.
We think this is very significant. I wanna leave it at that. We're currently analyzing the data in-house of the stroke and the AMI data. We're crunching the numbers right now. We'll be presenting this
At a scientific meeting after the summer, and then we will have clarity on how we are going to drive the phase III program.
Thank you.
Next question is from Sachin Jain from Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Hi there, Sachin Jain, Bank of America. Two topics, both actually just clarifications of prior. Werner, on the macro factors and the volatility you've referenced, just to get a bit more color, I'm just checking if the current macro factors that you see continue, we should think of guide as conservative and macro factors have to worsen not to see guide upgrade later in the year. Just, you know, just to clarify the volatility reference. Then Stefan, apologies for some further on asundexian, if I may. Just firstly, how are you thinking about should you make a phase III decision partnering this asset versus progressing it on your own? Then you've referenced making a phase III decision in the back end of the year. I just want to be super clear on this.
The NEJM paper on PACIFIC-AF pretty much said a phase III in SPAF was warranted. Is the debate you're having whether you go broader than SPAF into non-embolic stroke ACS, which is the data you have in-house, or is SPAF still a debate? Thank you.
Let me start again with the first question before I hand it over to Stefan again. On macro, what we've seen in Q1 , assuming that would be stable would, of course, provide upside. Yeah, there's no limits that we have seen in our ability to manage that volatility in Q1 . You've seen us take strong action on pricing. Rodrigo referred to it earlier, and you also see it, you know, in the reported numbers. We have coped well with the supply chain stress that we see across our businesses. We are managing our product supply organization.
Our people, you know, go out of their way and jump through fire rings in order to make the stuff that we can sell because, you know, demand is really very, very strong. My comments and also Wolfgang's comments were related to the volatility that is out there without us knowing what's going to materialize. If we see a relatively stable environment the way it is right now, things would be actually, I think, very, very good. As a matter of caution, due to the fact that we don't know what's going to happen in the next month to come, we have stayed with the guidance, and just let me repeat what Wolfgang said, for the time being.
Hi, Sachin. Again, on asundexian, whether we can go broader than AFib, that is precisely what we're looking into right now based on the other two studies. This is a very broad study program that we did in terms of patients that we enrolled. Lots of data to look at both in stroke and PACIFIC-AMI. Yes, we're encouraged by the results from the AFib trial, as I said, and we see ourselves phase III ready for decision-making in the second half. In terms of partnering, you know, we have full global rights to asundexian. It's ours. We have been building a U.S. footprint for the Verquvo launch, and we're also supporting Merck in their Verquvo launch in the U.S.
We have a good presence that we can build on. We have not currently made any determination whether to partner or not, but that is obviously always an option, that we have. We feel also strong enough, if need be, to go alone.
Thank you. Very clear.
Next question is from the line of Michael Leuchten of UBS. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much. Two questions, please. One for Rodrigo. Just going back to the beginning of the year where you made it very clear that the guidance for this year was mostly based on price. Now you had almost 6% volume growth in the Q1 . Was that ahead of your expectations, or was that volume contribution in line with how you thought the year was going to progress? A question for Stefan. I think it's been a while since we've seen some pipeline pruning at Bayer in pharma. Just wondering if you could talk to the timing of the discontinuations, the decisions, and what would have been the underlying pharma EBITDA margin in the Q1 had there not been the R&D charge for the quarter. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you for the question. Let me start on the Crop Science here. We saw 75% of our growth driven by price and 25% by volume. We are pleased to see some of the volume increase, especially in corn, as was mentioned by Wolfgang, that we had almost globally, with exception of US because of an acreage reduction, that we are seeing a shift to soybean, to be more precise. Also we saw some anticipation of volume for the fungicide, as an example. We could see a little bit of that, and that's why we still see some growth on the Q2 , but probably half of what we saw in the Q1 . That's a little bit of the plan that we have, and then Q2 , second half of the year as we mentioned.
I think for the full year, price will be the major contribution of growth that we're gonna have for the Crop Science division. I'm glad to see the execution and the discipline that we're putting in all the markets, in all the business lines for that one. With that, let me pass the ball to Stefan here.
Thanks, Michael. Bad data from clinical research is never a good thing to have. Thank God we don't have much of that lately. The effect on the Q1 is not that much. If you look at our margin, it's mostly currency headwinds that we've been getting. Also that we had, on the bright side, the PRV last year in the Q1 that we don't have this quarter. Pipeline is relatively minor. We should be on our target margin for the year.
Thank you.
Next question is from the line of James Quigley from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Hi there. Thanks for taking my questions. A couple product questions and a provision question. NUBEQA got fast track designation in the metastatic setting. What's the feedback been from the ARASENS trial data so far? And based on the feedback, how are you thinking about the pace of the launch? And what are the key areas or issues that you need to overcome with potential prescribers in terms of using chemo combined with NUBEQA? On the broader Factor XI portfolio, sozumab and fisimersin, the trials completed in end-stage renal disease per clinicaltrials.gov back in the last year or early this year. What's the latest with these two assets? You know, when could we potentially see some data?
Are there any particular advantages of using the antibody or mRNA approaches in, or RNA approaches in end-stage renal diseases? Just a clarification on potential data timing for asundexian. You said, medical conference after the summer, ESC is right at the end of the summer. Are you expecting to miss ESC or potentially get into ESC? Very quick final one on provisions. On the glyphosate provision at the end of last year, you said there was $7.5 billion left, and you're gonna be paying out EUR 2.5 billion in provisions this year. What proportion of that EUR 2.5 billion relates to the glyphosate liability, just so we can get an idea of where the provision could be at the end of the year? Thank you.
Okay. Thank you, James. So those were quite a number of questions. I hope I got everything of what you asked there. The sound quality was not ideal. Please feel free to complete my answer with more questions. On NUBEQA, your question on how we see the feedback that we're getting on the ARAMIS trial from regulators, obviously positive, because we got a priority review from the FDA. We should get very soon approval to commercialize this in the United States.
What we're hearing from the KOL community on ARAMIS is extremely positive and encouraging because we sort of like now cover the two bookends of prostate cancer from the non-metastatic castrate-resistant patient to the metastatic that is also treated with chemo. Very encouraging from a data perspective, and you know that's what counts in oncology. We believe that this will further boost our already positive launch trajectory on NUBEQA. Factor XI. You asked me a really good question. When does the summer end? Let's say that the summer ends somewhere in the month of July and August in our neck of the woods. That may include some congress in Europe.
I think or let's say that summer ends before, and it will be in some congress from thereafter. I can't give you the name of the scientific meeting because I'm not allowed to. Yeah, there was a part of your question that I couldn't really hear in terms of other things on asundexian. You may wanna ask that again, please. I couldn't.
It was more just an update on the Factor XI antibody and the RNA therapy.
Oh.
When could we see some data on those two?
Yeah. It's just like asundexian. We're crunching through the data, and we expect to take one decision in the second half in terms of what we do with all three of them. You know, we have an antibody, an antisense, and an oral, and we'll take it from there.
Great.
Yeah. James, I'll take the provision question. You may recall at the end of the year with about EUR 9 billion on the books in total for provisions on the legal cases. You saw us paying out about half a billion EUR in Q1. Just as a reminder, these are not new settlements. These are just.
Okay
agreements that we reached last year, and they're just coming to a payout. That leaves us somewhere in the EUR 8.5 range. In general, it includes, of course, glyphosate, but also PCB and a little bit of Isure and dicamba. But you can work under the assumption that the vast majority is glyphosate. Think somewhere around 80% of that. You heard that
We just got the preliminary approval on PCB for the class settlement. You can assume that once that gets finalized, there are also payouts from there. It's still our assumption based on the pre-agreements that we had for the year that we'll have total in our cash flow and in our net debt forecast around EUR 2.5 billion. Some to come for the remainder of the year.
Great. Thank you.
You're welcome.
Next question is from Keyur Parekh from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thank you for taking my questions, two, if I may please. One, kind of given the growth in crop and given you're expecting about 11% growth in the Q2 for the crop business, wondering how much glyphosate pricing needs to decline in the second half of the year for you to achieve that 7%, guidance for the full year? Because kind of on my math, glyphosate pricing would have to be down kind of north of 25% for that to be real. So just wondering, if that is indeed the correct math, and do you have visibility on the, reopening of Chinese production there? That's kind of question number one. Secondly, wondering if you're able to provide any update on the, on the situation with SCOTUS.
I know that there's nothing kind of publicly available, but just how confident you are that you will hear back from the Solicitor General during the middle of 2022. Thank you.
Thank you for the question. Let me start on the pricing of glyphosate and the plan that we have. When we guide, and Vincent was referring to that, right, at the beginning of the call here. When we guide for the year, we plan the year that we would have a very strong first six months, and we would have a weaker second half of the year. That was part of the plan. By the way, consistent with that's execution that we are doing probably a little bit better than that. What we planned for that, and again, working 25 years in this industry and with glyphosate, we saw those scenarios before, right?
What we planned for the second half of the year is more a normal price of glyphosate as we compare to the historical level with some additional costs that happened to all the industry. That's what we have on the plan. As Werner referred, we're gonna continue executing. Hopefully, we can do better than that, but that was the plan that we put in place to the second half of the year. With that, I'll pass to you, Werner, on the second part of the question.
Yeah. Thanks, Rudy. Okay. On SCOTUS, the delivery of the government's opinion through the Solicitor General is not time-bound. There is no deadline that we can, you know, put our heads on, and hence, we are just waiting for that opinion to be released. Yeah, for the time being, there's really no further update that we can give because there are no deadlines set.
Mr. Parekh, are you finished with your questions?
Yes, please. Thank you.
Next question is from the line of Falko Friedrichs from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Two questions, please. My first one is on Xarelto, right? It declined 5% in the Q1 . How much of this was really driven by China? Or putting it differently, how would it have performed in Q1 without this China headwind? My second question is on your soybean business, and whether you feel that you're catching up in the market again and gaining market share again, or whether that is still too early. Thank you.
Hi, Falko. Let me try to give you an answer. We've seen positive growth across all of our regions in Xarelto in the Q1 , except for China. China was basically a 50% reduction of our sales, which is a combination of price and volume in the Q1 as a consequence of VBP. Europe still strong growth. Japan about at previous year. That was where we stand.
Let me go to the second part of the question on the market share in Crop Science here. Normally, working on this market for so many years, I'm very cautious about market share on Q1 , especially because in U.S., we are just about initial planting. Just to give you a data, I was looking on Sunday. The planting is very late in U.S., right? We have 22% planting in corn by the weekend, when normally a five-year average would be 50%, or in soybean is 12%, when normally five-year average is 24%. We are late. It's hard to make a precise number of market share.
What I can tell you is that we see and we projected for this year that we're gonna be the leading platform in soybean, and I think we're gonna be the leading platform in the industry in U.S., and that's what we're seeing on our numbers as well. I'll give you more details on market share on Q2 as we get more the planting and the data real, but that's, we're still very aligned with the plans that we set for the year for soybean.
Okay, thank you. Are there any specific reasons why the planting is a little bit delayed this year?
It's weather-related, right? You have cold weather in some regions, some dry weather as well. That's a little delay. That's about the shift that we are seeing in terms of soy and corn that was announced. 2-4 million acres from corn to soy is related to that as well. That remains to be seen at the end of the day. Thank you.
Okay, thank you.
Next question is from the line of Joel Jackson from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Hi, this is Alex Chen on for Joel Jackson. Thanks for taking my questions. For my first question, could you maybe talk a bit about the challenges, if any, of pushing through inflation into crop chemicals pricing and how this might differ for glyphosate and non-glyphosate products? For my second question, maybe you could provide us a bit of color on sales to Ukraine so far and how or what is your projections or how much of Ukraine's acreage has been or will be planted? Thank you.
Let me share. Well, we projected for the year, overall, as we mentioned for the corn fungicide, insecticides, a price increase of 6%-7%, and we are executing that above the inflation, so we are able to drive the growth that we planned. I'll reinforce some of the numbers that was mentioned by Wolfgang. On the Q1 , we saw a 19% increase in fungicide, 12% insecticides, 10% in corn, mainly driven by pricing, and we are able to capture that based on the value of the technology innovation that we are bringing here. This is the main driver of the value here, the innovation and the technology that we're launching in the market. We are seeing that.
That's also, when I look to the plans, for the next years, the reach of the pipeline that we have, we just announced this year. This is the year that we announced the most prolific pipeline that we've seen in many years. We are seeing that a lot of the Precision Breeding that we are doing on soybean, corn, cotton as well. We are seeing new launches of biotech as well. That's a little bit about that. Just one information about Ukraine, and then I'll pass to Werner to complement. We are seeing around 75% of the crop in Ukraine in the Crop Science to be planted by the farmers. Werner?
Thanks, Rodrigo. Just let me add maybe a couple of points. Beyond crop, you've also seen probably in consumer that we have taken strong price. Yeah. To the extent possible, we are passing on inflation with pricing that we are taking. On top of that, for Q1 , we haven't seen any impact that would be material in our numbers from Ukraine and actually, as a matter of fact, also from Russia. Yeah. You know, the Ukrainian business is mostly, as Rodrigo mentioned, an ag business with two-thirds plus being ag.
You know, we've been, I think not only us, but all companies, you know, that operate in the ag inputs area, have gone out of their way in order to make sure that they can supply and do quite a bit of planting has actually happened. Yeah. Which is, I think, you know, given the circumstances, good news.
Mr. Jackson, are you finished with your questions?
Yes, thank you.
Next question is from the line of Christian Faitz from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you. Good afternoon, gentlemen. Congrats on the results. Question for Wolfgang. You mentioned the EUR 200 million cost inflation in Crop Science in Q1. What was the cost inflation in the other two segments, roughly? Is it fair to assume the similar cost effects for Q2 with a decreasing year-on-year effect into Q3 and Q4 at current input prices? My second question is, any impact from the current China lockdowns on your activities, as you can judge from here on? Thank you.
Thanks. Let me be rather generic here because we don't wanna break it out everywhere. We did it in Crop Science because it has by far the biggest COGS portion. As Werner said, we have inflation everywhere. It's one of the macro trends. It's in energy, freight, active ingredients. It's also on labor. The job is really to pass that on to the market. That is working pretty well in Crop Science and Consumer Health. It's a bit more difficult on pharma, where most of it is pre-negotiated. I'll let my colleagues comment on China probably. Or Werner, if you take a first stab at it, and the effects there.
Yeah. Hi, Christian. On China, Q1 virtually no impact, but more in the making. You know, China is clearly impacted by the lockdowns. We see it in our consumer, but also in our pharma business. You know, to which extent this is going to have a bearing on our number, way too early to tell, because there's no clear perspective on how long and how severe the lockdowns you know will continue to be. Yeah. For the time being, you know, I think everything is set in terms of our perspective on the year.
Okay, great. Thank you. Very helpful.
Next question is from Steve Byrne of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thank you. Rodrigo, we heard from a couple of ag channel checks that you were selling some Enlist soybeans this year. Might you shift in that direction, or is this just certain geographies, or would you characterize this as kind of testing the waters ahead of your own next generation herbicide tolerant stack that's gonna have 2/4-D tolerance in it? When might that happen?
Very hard to understand. Are you using a headset or anything? Any chance to improve that? Because we had a hard time to get that question.
Maybe this would help.
Yeah, a little bit better.
Can you hear me now?
Yeah, let's try that.
All right. My question was to Rodrigo about some channel check comments that said that Bayer was selling some Enlist soybeans this year. I don't know if that's just kind of a testing the waters ahead of your next generation soybean stack that's gonna have 2/4-D tolerance in it. When do you think that might be available?
Let me talk a little bit about the platforms here in soybean. That's a great question about our soybeans. We are seeing a great transition, and that's the price impact that we saw in Q1 for XtendFlex. That's the first migration that we are seeing. We have HT4 that you're mentioning that we are planning to launch by 2027, 2026, 2027, depending on the regulatory scheme, right? We are following that one. What we have today is the migration for XtendFlex. Xtend will continue to be our main platform.
As we talk also previously, we're gonna have Enlist in some specific situations in markets, but we are planning the full launch of HT4 that we're gonna have our own two, 4-D resistance in the future, and that's a very good platform, and that will be a major breakthrough in the market as well.
One follow-up for you, Rodrigo, on the Intacta2 launch in South America. I know the harvest is still underway, but any comments on how your Intacta2 compared to Intacta1 with respect to yield, and maybe more importantly, the requirements for insect protection applications, how did those compare? Any changes to your expectations on that ramp?
Well, thank you for that question. That's a great question. We are very excited about Intacta2 Xtend. I was in Brazil three weeks ago in Mato Grosso, visiting some farmers, and it was really amazing to see some of the performance that. You nailed it, right? We are seeing great yield results. We are seeing a yield improvement. That's the main driver for the farmers to select the technology. We're also seeing a broader spectrum of control of worms there as well. It's a little bit above what we were expecting, and we are seeing a great shift from Intacta to Intacta2 Xtend in Brazil. It's going extremely well so far.
Of course, it's still harvesting time, and we're gonna see more of that, but it's going very well.
How do you prevent those seeds from being transferred to Argentina illegally?
Well, there is several actions here. First of all, there is no regulatory in Argentina, right? You don't have an approval different from the past that you'd have an approval in the country to plant. There is no regulatory approval in Argentina. Also there is other actions that you can take, legal actions, and also in terms of agreements in place. The major one is that there is a regulatory, and there is no breeding effort in Argentina. There is no varieties that are being developed for Argentina as well. That's. There are several elements of that, but I would say that we are confident that different from what we saw probably on the first generation many years ago, this case now here we have all the patent protection.
There is no breeding efforts for Argentina today, and there is no regulatory approvals as well.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next question is from Richard Vosser of JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
Hi. Sorry, excuse me. Hi, thanks for taking my question. Just to follow up on Sachin's question, first of all. Just, it seems to me that one of the strategic things that you mentioned lacking in pharma was a credible, strong U.S. business and building that up. You've been doing that with Kerendia. Just a clarification on the comments on the Factor XI, because that would seem to really bring you to the first rank in terms of having a U.S. business and the comments on partnering leaving that open. It seems that would address some of the strategic issues. Just your thoughts there. Then just, secondly on ag. It probably a little early, but you know, should we be anticipating currency environments?
You mentioned the weather leading to late planting, but pricing for next year in terms of the North American season, you know, we've obviously had increasing price cards this year and in August you will have a chance to think about that again. Should we anticipate with input costs rising, pricing being raised again for 2023? Thanks very much.
Hi, Richard, and thank you for sharing our enthusiasm around asundexian and around our strength in the U.S. position. Yes, we are building for success in the U.S., and yes, we're ready to do this on our own.
I just said that I want to never exclude an option as we have it. Let's stay tuned for our phase III program, but we are ready to do this ourselves.
Richard, let me tackle the second one also. Thank you very much for the question. Let me share a little bit of perspective here. That's a great question. I've been working in this innovation industry for 25 years. Let me share one thing. When we are planning prices, the first thing that we see when we take a deep look on an innovation like our engine here is our performance. Performance of our technology, our innovation, and I'm very excited what I'm seeing. That's something that is important. We announced that we launched 500 new varieties and hybrids coming from the Precision Breeding that we set up. We are launching SmartStax PRO in U.S., FT Pro4 in South America. We just talk about Intacta2 Xtend and XtendFlex, and we have TriVolt launch in cotton.
Long story short, when I see our plans for 2023, I'm confident. It's early to say what would be the price cards for that for next year. Of course, that's a very important element when we see the guidance that we set for the EBITDA margin for the next years will be the pricing. I think we have a good engine in terms of innovation. We have a good discipline on pricing, so I feel confident about the plans that we're gonna probably launch by June, July, as you mentioned. I see today it's too early to talk about 2023 and 2024, but the fundamentals are very strong. Let me say like that. Thank you very much.
Vosser, are you finished with your questions?
I am indeed. Thank you very much. That's very kind.
Ladies and gentlemen, we kindly ask for your understanding that we have to close this call now due to time constraints. Excuse me, Mr. Maier. Please continue with any other points you wish to re-raise.
Great. Thank you very much, Stuart. Thanks to all of you for your time and attention today and for the great questions. Greatly appreciated. This closes our call for Q1, and talk soon. Thank you. Stay safe.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the Q1 2022 investor and analyst conference call of Bayer AG. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.