Welcome to the Knorr-Bremse AG earnings call for Q3 2020. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Andreas Spitzauer, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, as well as good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Andreas Spitzauer, Head of Investor Relations of Knorr-Bremse AG. I want to welcome you to Knorr-Bremse's conference call for the third quarter 2020 results. As a reminder, the conference call will be recorded and is available on our homepage, www.knorr-bremse.com, in the Investor Relations section. Here, you can find today's presentation and later a transcript of the call as well. It is now my pleasure to hand over the call to Frank Markus Weber, CFO of Knorr-Bremse. Please go ahead, Mr. Weber.
Thank you, Andreas. Dear ladies and gentlemen, I do warmly welcome you to our conference call for the third quarter results of Knorr-Bremse in 2020. We appreciate you joining us today and hope that you and your families remain healthy and safe. Today's call is made up of two parts. First, I will present the financial results of the last quarter, followed by an update on the guidance for 2020 and an initial view on the coming financial year. Thereafter, together with my two colleagues in the executive board, Dr. Jürgen Wilder and Dr. Peter Laier, we will answer your questions. Before we start the presentation, I would like to say a few words about our employees at Knorr-Bremse. The whole executive board is very proud of the strong engagement, motivation, and execution by the team in the last months, despite an ongoing challenging environment.
Everyone remains very focused and is highly committed to serve our customers and Knorr-Bremse as good as possible. We think that is outstanding and worth mentioning before everything else. We are continuing to focus on health and safety as number one priority at Knorr-Bremse for our colleagues, our customers, and our business partners. Let me start with the main topics of the third quarter on chart two. In the third quarter 2020, again, financials were strong in both divisions, and Knorr-Bremse was able to give an impressive demonstration of its superior performance and the high level of resilience. In CVS, we saw a strong market recovery and managed to outperform the market once more. Our RVS division also proved its resilience, driven by a stringent implementation of the defined measures. In terms of earlier reporting, we now made considerable first progress on our path.
Compared to the same quarter in 2019, we already achieved an improvement by eight days. As mentioned before, earlier reporting and the IFRS migration will be a core focus of Knorr-Bremse going forward. More to follow in 2021. Last but not least, I am happy to inform you that Dr. Jan Michael Mrosik, currently COO of Digital Industries at Siemens, will be joining the executive management team of Knorr-Bremse as of January 1st, 2021. The whole leadership team is very much looking forward to having him on board very soon. We believe that he is a great addition, and we will now complete our team. Let me continue with chart three and the market development in the third quarter. On the rolling stock side, global markets further recovered in the last month.
The whole rail industry was spared from cancellations, but we still see postponements, which will have an impact on the revenue development of RVS in 2020 and also in 2021. Overall, OEM production capacities in almost all countries further improved to more normalized, almost pre-COVID-19 levels. We are still in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and have to monitor the impact of the currently rising number of infected people, basically all over the globe, very closely. Stimulus packages with promising links to green mobility are in planning in several countries, which strongly support the mood and the expectations within the rail industry. The aftermarket business is also affected by the pandemic to a certain extent. We have seen pull-ins from the second half of 2020 into the first half of the year due to the rapid COVID-19 development at the beginning of the year.
Due to the ongoing restrictions and lockdowns over the past month, a low ridership in trains is recorded as passengers make adjustments due to social distancing. Nevertheless, we have realized encouraging signs of improvement ridership due to lower number of infected people during summertime. Unfortunately, number of people in trains decreased again recently because of the increasing number of infected people. After the very negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for trucks and availability of production capacities in the second quarter 2020, markets for our truck business strongly recovered in the last month. All major markets, for example, North America, Europe, and China, significantly improved and short-time work consequently could be suspended.
China, where we saw record levels of truck production rates in the second quarter, still shows a solid performance, which is expected to be ongoing for the rest of the year, supported by pull-in effects from 2021. The ongoing pandemic still challenges the whole industry, and significantly increasing infection rates could influence the currently positive truck demand and therefore must be watched very closely. Let us proceed to chart four. I will walk you through the most interesting recent events in Knorr-Bremse in quarter three, especially. We launched a new EUR 3 billion debt issuance program in order to increase our financial flexibility quickly if needed. In October, we paid back EUR 250 million out of the EUR 750 million, which we drew at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, because the negative financial impact by the pandemic was less than expected so far and also beyond.
The rail division won a major contract from Siemens for entrance systems for 94 underground trains in London. In addition, it has prolonged the contract with Bombardier regarding the maintenance of braking systems on TRAXX locomotives by five years. RVS announced that it will equip 30 high-speed ICE trains for Deutsche Bahn with an option of additional 60 trains. In order to meet the strong demand, the truck division expands manufacturing capacity in China by building a new plant and continues the strategic cooperation on automated manual transmission, advanced driver assistance, and highly automated driving with Dongfeng. Our spearhead in the North American truck market, Bendix, acquired full ownership of Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake LLC, a joint venture formed with Dana in 2004. Let me continue with the financial highlights overview on a nine-month basis before diving into the details of the third quarter results.
On chart five, you can see the summary of the key figures nine months year-to-date. Considering the uncertain economic environment around the world in this very unusual year, Knorr-Bremse's overall performance and resilience since the beginning of the year has been remarkable. The numbers confirm the special robustness that is embedded in Knorr-Bremse's business model, even if some segments are more affected by the crisis than others. Nevertheless, KB's results were negatively affected by the pandemic, too, even though to a significantly lesser extent than other companies in the industrial sector. During the first nine months of 2020, revenues came in at EUR 4.6 billion, 14% lower year-over-year. The EBITDA margin reached strong 17.5%, the upper end of our full year guidance for 2020. The free cash flow of EUR 169 million saw a sharp decline versus the previous year's period.
Especially the first quarter 2020 was weaker than 2019 and even negative. Free cash flow improved strongly in the last quarter, and we expect so also in quarter four. Let me continue with an overview of the financial highlights of the third quarter on chart six. Overall, COVID-19 still had an impact on business development in the past quarter, even though performance has already improved significantly compared to quarter two 2020. Order intake was at EUR 1.6 billion for the group, and our order book of EUR 4.5 billion remained on a high level and provides good visibility for the coming quarters. At EUR 1.5 billion, revenues decreased by -10% compared to the third quarter of last year, driven organically by both RVS and CVS, but also FX headwinds were recorded.
Our EBITDA margin, nevertheless, decreased only slightly from 18.3% to 17.5% in quarter three, which we consider to be a very good level of profitability. It is a further proof of our resilient business model at Knorr-Bremse. The free cash flow in the third quarter amounted to EUR 182 million and was up by nearly 10% compared to the previous year's level. Our cash conversion rate reached 129%. Let me dive deeper into our quarterly results on chart seven. Order intake on group level in Q3 increased by 4% to EUR 1.63 billion compared to the same period in the previous year. On an organic basis, the increase was even higher at around 6%.
Compared with the development in the second quarter of 2020, in which we still had to record a decline in order intake of almost 1/3 year-over-year, the performance in the past quarter was extremely strong. This result was mainly driven by CVS, which was positively affected also by a lot of pent-up demand in Europe and in North America after a very sharp decline before. Our book-to-bill ratio in quarter three was positively impacted as well, reaching 1.06 versus 0.92 in the previous year's quarter. The development of the order book at the end of the third quarter was particularly pleasing. Despite the ongoing impact of the pandemic, compared with the previous year's order backlog, it increased by 1.2% to EUR 4.46 billion. This level is only 5% below pre-COVID-19, which we showed at the end of 2019. Let me continue with our revenue development on chart eight.
In the quarter July to September 2020, revenues on group level decreased by -10% or in absolute numbers by EUR -178 million to EUR 1.54 billion. On an organic level, we saw better development. Organic development was better, with a decline of only 7%. Compared with the development in the second quarter of 2020, with a revenue decrease of more than 20%, the drop in quarter three more than halved year-over-year. As in the second quarter, the APAC region must be explicitly mentioned. It entered the COVID-19 pandemic first. This region was able to continue the good recovery from the previous quarter. As a result, APAC was able to grow by 1% year-over-year and kept the solid demand across quarter three.
The regions North America and Europe recorded double-digit sales declines in the third quarter year-over-year, but these decreases were significantly lower than in the previous quarter. Nevertheless, North America still stood at -23% versus the levels of 2019. Let me continue with the development of our profitability on chart nine. In the third quarter of 2020, group's EBITDA was EUR 260 million, after EUR 313 million in the previous year's quarter. The EBITDA margin amounted to 17.5% after 18.3% in quarter three 2019. This slight decrease continuously resulted from CVS. Volume effects of a declining OE business with corresponding impact on the operating leverage and by a lower aftermarket share. Compared with the second quarter of 2020, with an EBIT margin of 17.2%, we were able to post already an increase in the last quarter again.
The margin impact of declining OE business was predominantly mitigated by cost initiatives in both divisions and on group level, which continued in the third quarter 2020. We were already able to reduce some of the measures in the past quarter as the demand situation recovered faster than expected in some segments. For example, RVS was already able to end short-term work in July, and CVS ended short-time work at the end of October. The aftermarket share slightly decreased from 38% in the third quarter of 2019 to 36% in the third quarter of 2020. In absolute figures, too. Aftermarket was not immune to the effects of the pandemic and recorded a decrease of 15% to EUR 551 million. This decrease was driven by both divisions.
The group's EBIT of EUR 195 million also saw a decline of EUR 55 million, which is less than half of the loss we did face in the second quarter year-over-year. At 12.7%, the EBIT margin was below the previous year's level of 14.6%. The higher deviation compared to the EBITDA of the previous year quarter comes basically from higher depreciation due to increased investment activities. In summary, we consider quarter three 2020 to be a good proof of Knorr-Bremse's business model in the continuously challenging market environment. Turning to slide 10. We have initiated a CapEx management program in the recent months and watch ongoing spending very closely. In the third quarter 2020, we realized first effects from these measures. Accordingly, investments did not only increase slightly compared to the previous year in relation to sales, investments were above our target range of 4.5%.
We expect that with increasing sales, we will again be in this range of 4%-5%. A substantial amount was invested in future growth options for both divisions. We continued to expand the capacity for air disc brakes in North America to support our market-leading position in this segment. We also made strategic investments in further software development for our global steering business and continue to invest what's necessary in technology and innovation. Net working capital at the end of the past quarter showed an increase to almost EUR 1.2 billion. The year-on-year increase was around EUR 100 million, which is less than in the second quarter, where we had a plus of EUR 150 million year-over-year. This development was mainly driven by measures to ensure the ability to supply our customers.
Our corporate policy, customer first, is very important to us and has been a cornerstone of our business success for decades. Accordingly, we have kept a higher level of inventory to support our customers in those difficult times and prevented a potential disruption of their supply chains, as well as granted longer payment terms for some customers. We also accepted a higher level of working capital. Nevertheless, we are continuously working on further optimizations and will reduce our working capital during the last quarter, but will still be prepared for a quick ramp-up of a business in the first quarter of the year 2021. Annualized operating ROCE was impacted by both lower EBIT and increased working capital, but still with 22.2% well above most other companies in the capital goods sector. On chart 11, I would like to continue with the cash flow KPIs.
Our free cash flow in the third quarter 2020 reached EUR 182 million, which is 10% higher compared to the third quarter 2019. It is more than 3x higher compared to the second quarter of 2020. The significant increase is predominantly driven by stronger profit quality of our underlying projects and products and effective countermeasures regarding cash preservation, such as optimization of CapEx and inventory, but also on reduced tax prepayments in regards to the tax authorities. Based on the ongoing installed measures and driven by a normal seasonal pattern, e.g., projects tend to be finished at year-end, we expect free cash flow to be significantly strong in quarter four 2020 as well. As mentioned in the second quarter presentation, the cash conversion rate is a very important KPI for me and for us.
As a reminder, our definition is free cash flow before M&A in relation to the net income. In the third quarter 2020, Knorr-Bremse reached a cash conversion rate of 129%, following 90% in the previous quarter and 41% achieved in the second quarter 2020. While it was strongly negative in quarter one with a minus of 43%. On chart 12, I would like to give you an update of the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our two businesses. Our Knorr-Bremse team is very closely monitoring the market situation, is prepared to act quickly if necessary. Overall, we have seen a good market recovery in the third quarter, both in the rail, but even more so in the truck industry. The major rail markets in Europe and APAC have further recovered. Even though pre-COVID-19 levels have not yet fully been reached.
We have not faced any cancellation of projects, but several projects are still subject to shifts and postponements. Therefore, also order intake, revenues, and earnings might fluctuate from quarter to quarter. In North America, the freight market still faces challenges such as a lower number of built rail cars or parked locomotives. Ridership remains again on lower levels, but the development in the recent months was encouraging. The long-haul passenger traffic of Deutsche Bahn in Germany, for example, was down to 15%-20% at the peak of the first wave of COVID-19, compared with the pre-corona timing. In the summertime, this level improved to around 75%. Currently, Germany, like many other countries, is in the middle of a second major lockdown wave. The capacity utilization of trains in the German long-distance passenger traffic is again down to around 20% of the pre-corona level.
This development shows us that passenger numbers on trains will recover very quickly when the impact of the pandemic is reduced. What does this mean for our rail division? Our suppliers have showed a stable development in recent months and have more or less returned to pre-crisis levels. Our own plants currently are at high capacity utilization and productivity as well. The key sales markets of our truck division have recovered significantly from the lows and are still showing continuously ongoing improvements. Currently, our U.S. customers are back to approximately 90% of pre-COVID levels and the European ones on levels of 90%-100%. Towards the end of the quarter, transport activity was back on roughly the same level as a year ago in most markets.
The Chinese truck market remains a class of its own, with a market development on a high level, even after record levels in quarter two of 2020. Japan and India further recover on a moderate level. In order to meet the increasing demand of the industry, we have taken precautious measures with our suppliers and at our own plants, e.g., securing the parts supply and increasing the safety measures at our own production plant even more. Let's move on to the divisional view, starting with RVS on slide 13. In the third quarter of 2020, order intake of Rail Vehicle Systems was at EUR 726 million, a decrease of 24% in total and 20% on an organic basis. Impacts by the pandemic, which led to tender shifts and postponements, were the main driver for this development.
I would like to remind you once more that developments in the rail industry with its long cycles do not go well with quarterly reporting, so to say. There are always fluctuating large orders in individual quarters which make comparisons difficult. The low order intake in the third quarter of 2020 also resulted from a major order in Germany in the amount of significantly above EUR 100 million, which Kiepe Electric was not able to sign. In addition, there was the postponement of the EUR 20 million contract in Taiwan. We firmly believe that RVS order intake in the fourth quarter 2020 will be meaningfully higher than in the last quarter. The book-to-bill ratio developed accordingly to the lower order intake and moved from 1.04 in the third quarter of 2019 to 0.88 in the third quarter of 2020.
The order book, on the other hand, increased by 3% year-over-year and finished the third quarter at EUR 3.4 billion. This level of order book is only 5% below the record level we have achieved in recent years. It provides a good visibility for the revenue development in the coming quarters, and it shows the overall stability of our business. I am now moving on to the revenue and profitability of the rail division on chart 14. In the third quarter of 2020, RVS recorded revenues of EUR 822 million, which only decreased by -5% organically year-over-year, but -10%, including FX and M&A effects. RVS recorded slightly declining sales in both the OE and the aftermarket business in the third quarter of 2020 year-over-year.
As already mentioned in our last call, RVS recorded pull forward effects from the second half of 2020 into the first half of the year in the aftermarket segment. Accordingly, revenues in this segment in the third quarter of 2020 were overall around 10% below the previous year's figure. Europe, which was affected by the pandemic, contributed about 40% of the year-on-year decline in the divisional sales. Predominantly, the OE business was affected by lower revenues for metro and light rail vehicles. The divisional passenger business overall grew and the aftermarket business mitigated the decline of the European business. APAC, including China, also declined overall, but less than Europe. We see that this region has already recovered significantly from the pandemic, but please keep in mind, it will take time for the process speed to return to normal levels. Almost all revenue segments declined year-over-year.
Despite this, our metro and locomotive business stood out positively, recording growth, particularly in China. In North America, we recorded an overall decline. Lower revenues, predominantly in freight could only be mitigated by the development in the service business. The profitability of RVS in the past quarter was certainly remarkable when considering the respective revenue drop. EBITDA of RVS came in at EUR 178 million in the third quarter 2020 and was down only -6% compared with last year's level. The EBITDA margin increased from 20.6% to 21.6%, and EBIT margin too increased from 17.3% to 17.8%. These margin improvements are also based on the following topics. First of all, the COVID-19 measures had a large impact in supporting profitability in this third quarter. Please keep in mind that the measures are predominantly of a short-term nature.
Nevertheless, we intend to make the biggest part of it possibly sustainable also for further years. Second of all, we sold the loss-making Powertech unit, which supports our business beyond quarter three 2019. I would like to continue with the development of our truck division on slide 15. Incoming orders of CVS were exceptionally strong and one of the highlights of the key figures in the third quarter of 2020 overall. At EUR 902 million, the overall figure was 45% higher than in the previous year and fully in line with the organic development. This development is very pleasing after the severe negative impacts on demand throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in Europe and North America. Both regions benefited from catch-up effects in the last quarter. In APAC, the development of order intake was again supported by China, already after a record demand in quarter two 2020.
Japan and India also saw a solid recovery since the very low levels in the first half of 2020. The order book of our truck division amounted to EUR 1.1 billion at the end of September 2020, which is a slight decrease year-over-year. The order book level of CVS, therefore, has almost reached pre-COVID-19 levels, among other things also supported by the acquisition of Sheppard. Let's move on to slide 16. CVS posted EUR 712 million in revenues for the third quarter of 2020. Compared with last year's figure, this is a decrease by nearly -11% and on an organic level of -10%. In North America and Europe, the decline in revenue in the last quarter was more than halved compared to the development in quarter two 2020. Both regions were nevertheless still strongly affected by the pandemic, but we saw a steady improvement in the general conditions.
The North American truck market also improved in quarter three, although a little bit lower due to tougher comparable figures last year. The APAC region again recorded revenue growth in the third quarter year-over-year, well supported by China and market share gains from our commercial vehicles division. The share of aftermarket slightly decreased from 30% in the previous year to 27%, which is due to a very strong OE business in this respective quarter three of 2020. In the third quarter, CVS achieved an EBITDA of EUR 102 million, which is significantly lower compared to the previous year, but is a doubling versus the second quarter of 2020, with only EUR 51 million. The EBITDA margin amounted to 14.3% compared to 16.3% a year ago. Also here, compared to the second quarter 2020, it is a margin improvement by almost 600 basis points.
In the past quarter, CVS also benefited from the successfully implemented cost measures. In addition, better capacity utilization supported profitability compared to the second quarter 2020. On chart 17, we compare the regional sales development of CVS with the regional development of TPR. In addition, we would like to give you our assessment of the TPR in the key regions until the end of the year 2020. Basically, we are quite confident regarding the truck industry in the foreseeable future. CVS once more strongly outperformed the underlying truck production in all major regions and markets year-over-year in the third quarter 2020. The CVS performance, driven by further growth in content per vehicle and market share gains predominantly in the APAC region. Until year-end, we expect an ongoing positive trend in truck production rates in Europe and in APAC.
The rate in North America should be able to experience a stable development in quarter four versus quarter three. The truck production rates in China are also expected to continue strongly, driven by subsidies to accelerate replacement of vehicles with higher emission standards, as well as further governmental support. Let's move on to chart 18, which shows our management agenda and things we are on the way to change to support our future development. Please let me dive deeper into five rather important topics for us. First, as announced in the second quarter 2020 conference call, cash flow has and will have an even higher priority at Knorr-Bremse. In the third quarter 2020, free cash flow already improved to EUR 182 million after EUR 48 million in the second quarter 2020.
In order to underline this focus, we are planning to include free cash flow targets too, consistently into our management and staff bonus system. Second, the world is changing, and sustainable management is becoming increasingly important. We see no contradiction here with the interest of our shareholders. On the contrary, only those who grow profitable have the freedom to successfully implement sustainability topics. We also see opportunities here. Our rail division, in particular, is clearly benefiting from the desire for more sustainable and greener mobility. In order to strengthen the rising importance of ESG topics within Knorr-Bremse, we are also planning to integrate concrete ESG targets into the compensation package as soon as possible. Third, earlier timing reporting is one of the focus topics going forward. We completely changed the setup of our IFRS migration project to strengthen our effort and ensure respective go live of the project.
As an example, we also intend to include the IFRS migration project into the management bonus system. Number four, as a relatively young company at the capital market, we want to raise the capital market thinking and understanding within Knorr-Bremse further. Therefore, we will expand the stock-based long-term incentive program for our middle management and implement a share program for all our global employees, where Knorr-Bremse would subsidize a certain purchase of Knorr-Bremse shares of our employees. Last but not least, overall, we believe that Knorr-Bremse has a very efficient and lean overhead and administrative setup. As in every other company, there is always room for improvement. We want to further optimize our internal processes and digitalize our activities to a higher extent. For example, we are currently organized on a regional basis to be as close to our customers as possible.
Why shouldn't it be possible in the next step for efficient regional locations to take over overlapping administrative tasks on a global level? That is, for example, what we mean with the acceleration of global business services at Knorr-Bremse. Let's move on to chart 19, the outlook for 2020, and for most of you, also quite important. Overall, Knorr-Bremse performed strongly in the first nine months of this extraordinary year. Our rapidly implemented countermeasures were well able to mitigate the market turbulences in both of our divisions so far. Due to the positive development in the past three months and the expected development in the fourth quarter, we confirm the guidance given in July 2020. Despite the fact that we did face some FX headwinds, especially in last quarter.
Subject to further lockdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic and any related negative effects on the course of business until end of the year, we continue to expect revenues between EUR 5.9 billion and EUR 6.2 billion, and operating EBITDA margin between 16.5% and 17.5%. Overall, we feel comfortable with the upper end of both ranges. I would like to end the presentation with chart 20, which gives you our first thoughts for 2021. We are currently in the planning process here at Knorr-Bremse for the next year. We should be completed over the next few weeks. In a nutshell, we would like to share with you our market outlook, our strategic focus, and the resulting first high-level indications for financials in 2021.
For the rail segment, we expect the passenger market to develop strongly, and the aftermarket overall should only be partially influenced by lower ridership in trains next year. In Europe, we expect more details regarding the Green Deal initiative, which clearly was positive for the rail division mid to long term. On the other hand, we also expect that the autonomous policy in China will continue to grow, which will affect our rail business in the medium to long term as well. Overall, however, the opportunities in Europe should be much greater than the potentially negative effects in China. According to our initial assessment for 2021, this should lead to a solid increase in RVS revenues, as well as even a slight growth of the EBITDA margin. On the CVS side, initial European and North American data for the truck market suggest significantly higher volumes for 2021.
The development in China should be negatively influenced by pull-in effects from 2021 into 2020. The overall aftermarket is expected to recover based on the assumption that transport volumes will recover, too. Our strategic focus in the truck segment will concentrate on further increasing the content per vehicle, further integrating the acquired companies in the steering sector, and further expanding of our Chinese business in general. We currently expect CVS should be able to deliver solid growth in revenues and solid EBITDA margin improvements in 2022 compared to 2020. Once again, these statements do not represent a guidance. They should help you understand the market and the conditions in 2021 as we see them at this point in time. Please note that these first indications for 2021 are subject to two important conditions. First of all, a generally stable market environment in rail and truck.
Second of all, the negative financial impacts of COVID-19 are limited and manageable. With this, I would like to thank you very much for listening and for your attention. Mr. Laier, Mr. Wilder, and myself are looking forward to your questions from now. Thank you.
Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Please ensure the mute function on your telephone is switched off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. If you find that your question has been answered, you may remove yourself from the queue by pressing star two. Again, please press star one to ask a question. We will take the first question from Lucie Carrier from Morgan Stanley.
Hi. Good afternoon, gentlemen, and thanks for taking my question. I have three question, and I would go one at a time, please. The first one was around the indication you provided very kindly for 2021. Can you maybe help us to think a bit more precisely about the terminology when you look about strong and modest in terms of improvement? I think it may have slightly different meaning for different people. Are you able maybe to provide a range when you talk about strong and modest?
Was that one question, or was that already the three?
It's just one question, please.
Okay. Yeah. As we have said, we don't expect this to be a quantitative guidance at this point in time, as I outlined that we are in the midst of a comprehensive planning process right at this point in time. We thought a qualitative kind of explanation would be already helpful for all of us somehow to understand where we are going. It's needless to say that we think that solid is better and stronger than slight. I think that is very clear. I think slight is, for us, a lower single-digit growth number somehow, and solid, therefore, would be better than only slight.
Okay. Thank you very much. This is helpful. My second question was related to the rail business, and I guess I have two questions to that. One is, you've mentioned some delay and postponement in terms of the tender activity. Do you have visibility on when those tenders are supposed to be awarded? Is it soon, or is it kind of indefinitely delayed? Then one comment you've made about the ridership being down and impacting your business. It seems to me that a few months ago, or at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, we were discussing that the ridership was not that much of an importance, but what was more important was the number of train on the track rather than the number of people on the train.
Is there a change to that in your view, or simply you expecting the train on the track itself to continue to be quite low because of the ridership?
I'm happy to take that question. It's Jürgen here . There's no change in that interpretation like we said a few months ago. It is more important, of course, that the trains are running, and we also continuously see the trains running, or the ridership is down a little bit. Of course, we do see an increased cost consciousness, for example, in Asia or China in terms of maintenance and maybe looking for to stretch a little bit maintenance cycles that might have a little bit of an impact. The interpretation that you rightfully heard a few months ago, that it mainly depends on the trains on the track and they are running, that is still very valid and will be valid in the future.
We have just seen, for example, that there is a certain impact to it, for example, in France now with the second wave. There's a little bit of a thinner schedule of trains running, and we might see that in other countries as well, but the interpretation is correct. Your first question regarding RVS with the tender activity. We have a good visibility of when what tenders will be awarded. Of course, there's always a little bit of fluctuation around when will it really happen. That's why we also said we do expect a stronger order entry in the fourth quarter than in the third quarter, where we had a little weak numbers. That is also due to, like Mr. Weber pointed out earlier, one project, especially for Kiepe, which was awarded in Q3, and we were not awarded that order.
I can tell you that is always large orders in the three-digit million range. I can also say that there's another order in the pipeline where we have very good chances to win in the next few weeks. We have already gotten feedback from the customer, there's always a timeline for peers, we need to wait for that. That will expire basically next week. If that goes through, we would be able in Q4, instead of Q3, to book a major order for Kiepe, that will turn around that situation. If it had been differently, you lose an order, you win an order. If it had been differently, that we had won Düsseldorf and not the other one, for example, Q3 would have been much stronger, that's how those fluctuations between quarter and quarter are always there.
You've also heard, maybe to add that briefly, that also the car builders expect an enhanced order entry over the next half a year. With some delay that then goes to the sub-suppliers like us. We expect from that also that we see, in the midterm, an increased order entry level again compared to how we have seen it in the past two quarters.
Thank you very much for the color. I guess my last question was around the free cash flow. Very impressive rebound in the third quarter and high conversion. Obviously, the beginning of the year had been a little bit weaker. When we think about the fourth quarter, that seasonally obviously is always quite strong, how much should we think in terms of what's sustainable in terms of what we saw in the third quarter and what was maybe more of a catch-up effect from the previous quarter, which were a little bit more on the low side?
First of all, I think, yes, you are right. The first quarter was rather weak. We usually have the tendency, so to say, to improve or to increase the working capital levels at the beginning of the year, that basically hits then the free cash flow line in the very first quarter. That was also this year the reason somehow why these negative results came up. Quarter three, we had some catch back effects, of course, but also significant cost measures that we have implemented. What also needs to be said that the underlying cash flow richness of the individual projects and products have been quite good. Underlying a good quality of the earnings in the quarter also plays in this quarter, which should be definitely sustainable. Yes, I would say, in addition to your question, there were some effects.
We have also, like all other companies as well, reduced the prepayments to the tax authorities, Germany, North America. I would say this did help us with maybe a not sustainable amount of maybe EUR 40 million, EUR 40 million, EUR 50 million. We, despite that, basically think that the free cash flow in the fourth quarter should be at least on this level that we have seen.
Thank you very much.
You're welcome.
We will now take the next question from Sven Weier from UBS.
Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions. Good afternoon, gentlemen. The first one is a follow-up on the rail comments you've just made. Obviously you're quite confident it seems on Q4. Would you be overall happy to expect the book-to-bill of around 1 for the unit this year? Associated to that, I remember in H1, in the report, you were indicating that you expect the backlog for the whole group at the end of 2020 to be higher than at the end of 2019, which means that in Q4, your order intake needs to be quite a bit above sales. Is that still your expectation on the group level? That's the first one. Thanks.
Yeah. Let me start with the rail portion there. Indeed, we expect that the Q4 will have, as I said before, a meaningful higher order entry than we had in Q3, which is even above where we see the sales. There should be a positive book-to-bill rate in Q4, which then would indeed increase the order book above what we see today. That's what I indeed would expect. Yeah, that would be my answer to your question.
That's good. Thank you very much, Mr. Wilder. If this then comes true, coming to your second question, I would then based on these assumptions, also still confirm what we have written in the second half year report, that our order book would then be slightly above the levels of end of December 2019. We can still confirm that. Would be also nevertheless than true for RVS per se and for the group.
Okay. Thank you for that. The other one is another rail question. Obviously, you've been mentioning the structural outlook for China, where maybe in the medium to long term, you might lose some share over there. On the other hand, obviously we're now seeing in Europe, you're constantly winning business from Alstom. Is that the right impression that you're gaining share in France on the back of these contracts, or how should we look at that situation?
Indeed, we see that there's a lot of opportunities for us in Europe, also in the upcoming years. The European market is actually growing quite a bit. That has something to do with replacement needs, and it's also quite right what you said, that we improved our position in France with some of the contracts that we have just recently and also last year won there. We can participate in a lot of replacement needs in Europe that we currently see. It's also the right interpretation, I would underline that what you implied, that maybe some headwinds that we might see in China because of an enhanced autonomous policy, which was always there, but it might be underlined a little bit because of trade war and also COVID impact, is something that we need to watch, that we need to react on.
Also, like stretched maintenance cycles that the Chinese, for cost consciousness, would apply to their fleet is compensated by better outlook in Europe that we see. I would confirm what you implied in your question, yes.
Okay. Thank you, Dr. Wilder. The next one is another follow-up from Mr. Weber. You mentioned that you're happy to confirm on the upper end of the guidance range for this year, and we had a few companies already making some positive comments how trading has held up in November despite the lockdowns. I suspect that is what you're currently seeing as well, that there's, at the moment, still no impact from the lockdowns we've saw.
Thank you. Yes, I can confirm that at this point in time, we don't see any impact and currently also don't anticipate in our forecast figures internally any headwind from that.
Okay, thank you. Maybe one final question, if I may. It's just coming back to your point about the temp costs and how you make them permanent, at least that's the intention. Can you just quantify in terms, I guess, in Q2, you probably had the maximum temp cost saving. Could you say that were relative to that, where you stood in Q3 percentage-wise? Was it still 80%, 90% of that? How do you see that developing then for Q4? Thank you.
Thank you. I think important question when it comes to, of course, also planning discussions internally. We have reached indeed the peak of our savings in the second quarter as also outlined with more than EUR 50 million in both divisions combined of savings. We still see a level of 70% roughly out of that in the third quarter. Already, as you can see, already significantly lower than in the second quarter due to some of the aspects I just mentioned. Nevertheless, I think there is potential still in there, that this number will not completely go down to 0% because you have, on the expenses side, quite a lot of stuff if you consider traveling, if you consider consultants cost, et cetera. There is quite a lot of even infrastructure cost if more people are working in home offices, et cetera.
A lot of potential, at least in that would be sustainable also for the next year to come, whether they will be ultimately sustainable, this we have to answer at a later point in time. There is potential in there to maybe 20%, 30% out of that as my very first guess this point in time.
But you bet you see another step down in Q4 from the 70%. Does it go down maybe to 50% or what would be ballpark there?
Ballpark would be maybe 50%, right.
Mm-hmm. Then 30%, as you said, is then sustainable then in the next year. Okay.
This would be the-
That's all from my side.
You're welcome.
Thank you very much for that. Thanks.
Thank you.
We will now take the next question from Felicitas Bismarck from Deutsche Bank.
Yes, thank you very much. I have another question on the order intake in rail. I'm sorry. I was just wondering, when I look at your solid growth assumption there, do you expect order intake to return to strong growth in 2021 and basically catch up on those postponements that you were seeing now that we have the news on the various vaccines? Does the low ridership still outweigh the better sentiment and you only expect a slight growth here?
We expect to return to a higher order entry. In 2021, even as I said before, we expect a stronger order entry in Q4. There is different aspects to it. First of all, if you look at the overall order entry this year, then I want to remind everybody that in Q4 2019, we had a really strong order entry.
Yeah.
Really strong order entry. Again, I think I said it last time, whether those orders come on 30th of December or on 2nd of January or something like that, makes a substantial difference to the fiscal year order entry. Then, of course, what I said earlier, that it really depends on when and what quarter do some larger contracts come. We always planned for, also in our business plan for Kiepe, that we win, let's say, one of those large orders in this year that I referred to earlier. Now we have lost the first one that was given, of course, you always prefer to win the first one, which was awarded in the industry, but we have lost it. Now it looks very, very positive that we win the second one that is out there, waiting for the appeal. That is the one thing.
If we had one that in Q3 or so, then the numbers would not look very, let's say, remarkable or something like that, or those questions would be asked. It's always the question, which quarter you get that. Of course, what we always also see is that with the COVID-19 crisis, there is of course, a little bit of a delay of tenders and a little bit of a delay of when car builders award the orders to us because they need to stretch their manufacturing schedules. They had some closures in the spring, and that will recover. The OEMs report that they expect, and we see the same in the market, an enhanced order entry, which will then come down to us in the future. That's why I would say, indeed, we'll see a better year in terms of order entry next year.
I have to say, I'm not really nervous about that. That has something to do with when do the orders come in, and of course, a little bit of a dip. The general trend that we see a positive book-to-bill and continue on our growth path also after this COVID-19 crisis, I don't question that. I strongly believe in that.
Okay, thanks. That's very helpful. The second question I had was also on rail, you had very strong margins. I think you originally actually guided for worse product mix in H2. Can you maybe indicate how you would see this developing going forward? Basically, why do you expect only slight growth in EBITDA margin in rail in 2020, despite solid growth in revenue? Is there a certain effect that comes into mind, or is that just basically a base effect?
Essentially, we see already in H2, we see a little bit of a different mix that we have pointed out before. What we have seen, for example, in H1 is that all the operators kind of were a little scared at the beginning of this crisis that they couldn't keep up their operations. Of course, that's their major task to do. They cannot afford to report like Deutsche Bahn or anybody else, like saying, "We don't have enough spare parts," or something like that. They started an initiative to basically order more spare parts at the beginning of the crisis, which we really benefited from. That's a little counterintuitive because you think once the crisis sets in, it hits us immediately, but it didn't.
We could deliver on those spare parts on the rail side right there, and that's why we had a very strong order entry in the first half. In the second half, it's a bit different because you can imagine that their stocks are filled more with spare parts. Now they need to use it before they buy new ones. When it comes to the outlook to next year, don't forget that we had a very strong reaction because we didn't know how this all works out. We know now much better at the beginning of the crisis, with one-time measures on our cost position. We really hit the brakes in spring of this year, and we still benefit from those measures that we have taken. Those are one-time measures. They are not necessarily sustainable.
We need to step off the brake a little bit in order to be ready for growth in the future. That's why we say we see a good growth on the revenue side and more or less slight growth in the margin.
Yeah. Okay.
That explains it, basically.
Yeah, absolutely. The last question I have is on CVS, actually. When you were talking about taking market share gains and content per vehicle, but especially the market share gains in Asia, from whom do you think you're actually taking that share?
That's a mix, to be honest. This is Peter Laier speaking. Thanks for the CVS question, by the way. On the one side, the market or the content in the vehicle is growing. That is why the market itself is growing. That is helping us. We are gaining here maybe over-proportionally. On the other side, yes, we take some share in the market from others, but it's a mix of competitors. It's not only one.
It's not your big competitor, but it might also be some lower quality ones?
Yeah. Exactly. It's a mix.
Okay. Thank you very much.
You're welcome.
The next question comes from Akash Gupta from JP Morgan.
Yes. Hi, good afternoon, everybody, and thanks for your time. My first question, also on RVS. I am wondering if you can discuss aftermarket business and particularly unit rate in a bit more detail. You said Q3 was down, maybe double digits in terms of aftermarket revenues in RVS. That comes after a strong H1. Maybe if you can tell us how much growth or decline you have seen in rail aftermarket year to date. What are your current expectations going forward?
If I understood that question correctly, it was how much growth we have seen on the aftermarket, right, this year. Well, the aftermarket-
Year to date, what's your assumption for Q4? Yes.
Yeah. The aftermarket so far it's a little down. We see some decline compared to last year on the aftermarket arena as well. It is somewhat affected, but it is also regionally quite different. We see continuously, let's say, rather strong performance or performance continuous like last year, for example, in Europe. We see, for example, in Asia, that we go down a little bit in the aftermarket business due to two reasons. First of all, that was also, of course, at the beginning of the year, or now, it's the impact, as I said, they also ordered some spare parts at the beginning of the year, COVID related. The other thing is that we face in China, a little bit of a tendency that the Chinese rail operators, they stretch the maintenance cycles a little bit by, let's say, 10%, 15%.
That this cost consciousness they have there, that also hits us to a certain extent in supplying spare parts and also services, compared to the past few years. That is an impact, some sort of one-time impact, if you make a decision to stretch those cycles because you have maintained those cars in the past according to recommended schedules by OEMs, which generally are on the safe side, and now you optimize it a little bit. We see a little bit of a stretch there, and that's where we mainly see a certain decline. We also see a certain decline and that's market related, really on the freight market in North America, because we have seen that the freight market and the logistics market is going way down.
There's a lot of cars that are in storage. There's a lot of locomotives that are in storage, and of course, there will be a catch-up effect once they get out of storage, back on the tracks, then they need some service in order to do so. We see that, let's say, probably later next year or even after that effect will set in North America. That's how the aftermarket business is distributed. In Europe it's still rather strong.
Thank you. My second question is on CVS side. In your recent investor presentation, you have shown your CVS offering in details. The question I have is, given the way how some of your customers are developing hydrogen fuel cell-powered trucks, is it fair to say that your entire product offering can be used in hydrogen-powered fuel cell truck, or are there any components that can't be used? Are there any other components that you are working on and you can increase your content in those hydrogen-powered trucks? That's question number.
Yeah. Thanks for the question. I would say in that way, we have a smaller part of our portfolio, but really in comparison to the overall revenue, negligible, which is combined with combustion engines. That is EGRs, exhaust gas recuperation valves and dampers for huge diesel engines. That's in some maybe double-digit million revenue, so small in comparison to the rest. The rest of the product portfolio is usable as well in e-mobility trucks, anyhow, if they have a fuel cell as a power generator or a battery. For sure, there are some adaptations necessary of the products, but as well, those new technologies, the fuel cell or battery electric vehicles are giving us growth opportunities. We have introduced for that a new R&D center, which we call the eCUBATOR, where we have the intention to bring somehow 50 engineers together.
We are actually maybe, I don't know, between 20 and 30 in there, and we'll enhance it there further, which is fully focusing on additional business opportunities in those new vehicles. Giving you some examples where we are already in compressed air in an e-mobility vehicle, cannot be produced by this classical piston compressors, which are mounted to the combustion engine, need to be produced by new compressor types. We have a screw compressor successfully introduced into the market. By the way, technology which we carried over from the rail division , they use it since decades. We have now developed a new technology, which is called the rotary vane compressor, which we are offering on the market and have received first awards for that. That's typical growth opportunities, just to name one example.
Thank you, Dr. Laier. I have two follow-up housekeeping questions. The first one is on slide number 17. The truck production outperformance that you have in your revenues versus TPR, is that revenue only OE? Does that also include aftermarket? It's the revenue growth that you have on slide number 17.
There is the aftermarket included.
This outlook for truck production, is that sequential or year-on-year?
Again, can you repeat? I didn't get it acoustically. Is it?
These bar and these arrow charts that you have for outlook TPR.
Yes. Yeah.
In 2020, are they sequential or are they year-on-year?
That's a year-end. That means this is our outlook basically for the fourth quarter.
Okay. Final one is on tax rate. For nine months, we had tax rates slightly below 28%, which is lower than 30% we have in last few years. Maybe comment on what should we expect for this year and next year tax rate? Thank you.
Yeah, you're right. The tax rate is on a level that we currently foresee on below 28%. This is absolutely true. The forecast you were asking for is what tax rate I see for fourth quarter or for the next year? Sorry, I didn't get it properly.
Yes. What should we assume for this year and next year models?
Yeah. I would basically say for this year, I would assume the just discussed tax rate, as we just said, 28%, slightly below. For next year, I would expect a higher one at this point in time, coming from the 28% towards the 30%, maybe in between somewhere. This is what I currently see.
Thank you.
We will now take the next question from Iris Zheng from Credit Suisse.
Oh, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. I've got two and I will do it one by one. Firstly, is on the monthly trends. If my memory is correct, I think in the last call, you've mentioned that over the summer, i.e. July and August, the order intake was up at 20% year-on-year, so very strong. If we look at the Q3 results, then it implies a quite significant slowdown in September. I wonder if maybe July to August was mainly driven by very strong pent-up demand, followed by a smaller September, and then how did October and November perform, if we can have some indications. Thank you.
Yes, of course. I do remember well. First of all, I also clearly mentioned that the positive development year-over-year on group level, July and August was only driven by CVS, where we mentioned somehow after the eight weeks order intake that it was somehow up in the range of nearly 50%. I remember that well. Second of all, it's the vast majority of the effect is driven by September and the RVS Kiepe deal that didn't come in, so to say, that brought the level significantly down overall and unexpected postponement in Taiwan, as I also outlined already before. If you take those two together, this is basically the explanation. In addition, but this is only minor, also some negative FX effects came in, but this is really only minor.
To have the full effect in total, that is the reason why, so to say, the 20% July offer in the end ended up with a 4% for the whole quarter.
This is very helpful. What about October and November? If we can give some sort of indication.
Also, as already outlined a little bit by Dr. Wilder, so we expect definitely fourth quarter to be stronger on the order intake side than what we have seen in the quarter three, which in the end should, given the respective revenues, needless to say, should give us this stronger order book by the end of the year. It's challenging, what we have there in our planning, especially also on the rail side, but we are, as Dr. Wilder said, we are fighting, so to say, for each and every contract here. For October, I would say-
Me on the rail side, I can say for October, in that context, it was as expected, yeah. We expect a strong Q4 and October within that was as expected.
For the October month, maybe to answer your question indirectly, but October looks better. On group level, we should be higher than September, and we are higher than in September, so it looks getting upwards again.
Great, thank you for the indication. My second question is on the rail diversion. Because you've mentioned that some of the aftermarket was pulled forward to the first half and therefore has had a negative impact in the second half. If there's any possibility that we can look at this, excluding the put-forward impact, then the underlying market, how do you see it? I'm asking this because I think for one of your major customer, a rail OEM, they've mentioned for their service, for example, in the last quarter, Q3, their service business grew mid to high single digits, and they see the market to be pretty much back to the normalized level. Therefore, I just want to have a sense of the underlying market, excluding the put-forward demand impact.
If you do allow before Dr. Wilder also gives you his insight. We have discussed, I think, several times that it's, of course, hard to grasp what the real pull- ahead effect really is in the end when it comes to your bookkeeping. How much of revenue was exactly pulled forward and whatnot, and what was pulled ahead, and so on. It's very difficult to figure out on the revenue side as well as on the profitability side. We are also not doing that to the most detailed account internally as it's nearly impossible to grasp.
It's also not that those impacts are huge or so. They are visible, but they are not really huge. It doesn't really suggest that there's a total remarkable thing going on in the market. Others might say that the maintenance market is back to normal. It also always depends on what you're looking at. Are you looking at basically the maintenance work that is being put into the trains that might have been less in the second quarter than in the third quarter? If you look on the other hand then to spare parts, which is the bulk of our aftermarket business, where operators say, "Better to be on the safe side and put them on stock," and therefore using them up while the maintenance work is done a little later.
We have all those kinds of dynamics and like Frank Weber already said it. Really difficult to say exactly what's going on where, but we see on our books that we added good, especially on the brake side, good orders and also deliveries in Q2, especially on the brake side and to a certain extent, those operators are living on that right now. When it comes to maintenance work and things like that might look slightly different.
Thank you. It sounds like the swing factor here is the spare parts of the business rather than the maintenance part.
Not sure whether I understood that question.
Could you repeat the question, please, Iris?
Oh, yeah. Sure. I just want to double-check, because it sounds like it's mainly the spare parts business that is currently moving the needles or is causing the volatility of the aftermarket. It sounds like the underlying maintenance business is not having or causing a lot of volatility.
No, all I was saying is that, of course, the bulk of our aftermarket business is still the spare parts business. If we saw some pull into second quarter, we basically refer to that.
Understood. Thank you.
As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one. We will now take our next question from Alfred Glaser from ODDO.
Yes, hello. Thank you for taking my questions. I had two questions. The first one on maintenance and aftermarket service in rail. You said previously that some operators are stretching out maintenance in China over longer periods. Do you see any kind of indications of this also in other countries? Do you think that this might be anyhow sustainable or is it just a one-off effect? I'll ask my second questions afterwards.
Yeah. Okay. First answer to that, yes, we do see that. It has something to do, if you recall how China developed and the way business in China developed, there were a lot of new trains that were ordered over the past 10 years. Expanding that fleet to that extent was also new to China, and of course, there's an underlying maintenance regime that is also unique for China because the kilometers that those trains run a year is much higher than in other parts of the world. Therefore, of course, when those new trains are ordered, there's always a maintenance schedule that comes with it that is basically recommended, of course, also by the car builders.
They are generally on the safe side, and since there was a lack of experience over the past few decades in China, how this maintenance regime works, of course, it's also not a surprise that they now start to optimize those maintenance plans to a certain extent. There is a lot of more experience in other parts of the world where this optimization is a constant thing. I would not say no to the question if that's a model for other parts in the world and do we need to see the impact of that in other parts of the world. The other part of your question was, will that be a one-time effect or will that be a continuous effect? You can only stretch it by so much. That also has its limits.
Once you did that and stretched it by, let's say, do you do a major overhaul after 1.2 million kilometers or let's say after 1.3 million kilometers? That's what we are talking about to be very concrete in those terms. You cannot extend it every year by another 100,000 or some point in time. I would rather say, of course, there is further optimizations going on, but it's more so a one-time impact to stretch those time maintenance side rather than a continuous impact. Therefore you can, of course, translate the stretches of those cycles into maybe a little bit of slowdown of the market growth that comes then with it, but it cannot be a continuous thing going on forever.
Thank you. That was very clear. My second question was actually on cash, free cash generation. You indicated in your slides that you will integrate free cash criteria into the remuneration of managers throughout the group. Do you think that going forward, this can structurally and permanently improve your cash conversion ratio? Currently, you're targeting 80%-90% on a recurring basis. Do you think that these measures could improve this target somewhat?
First of all, we do believe that by implementing this, we shift even further focus of each and everybody at Knorr-Bremse to this important figure of free cash flow.
In the end, we just think it will make it more a general pattern at Knorr-Bremse to also strive for free cash flow the same way they are striving for good EBITDA margins. It's just bringing it up to the level of importance within the group. Do I, at the same time, intend to raise the targets because of this effect? I doubt so. I think we will make the targets or the achievement of our targets then hopefully achieved easier with that additional view on things. I will not raise the 80% to 90%. I also said last time that I somehow see the floor of Knorr-Bremse at rather levels of 70%- 80%. In no case we can imagine a company, Knorr-Bremse, to fall below these levels of 70%- 80%.
This is what's also out there as, so to say, our direction going forward. Long story short answer, I don't see immediately the effect to link that to a target increase. It's hygienically, I think, important to do that consistently, and therefore we are also not implementing that also in the middle management bonus system, but comprehensively in the overall management, including board members, middle management, and employees. That's our intention.
Okay. Thank you very much.
You're welcome.
As there are no further questions in the queue, I'd like to hand the call back over to your hosts for any additional or closing remarks.
Thank you, operator. Thank you for all the questions. We hope that you stay healthy. We wish you a lovely Christmas time as much as possible as is here, and we're looking forward to staying in contact with you going forward. Thank you and bye-bye.
Thank you. That will conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, ladies and gentlemen. You may now disconnect.