Hello, and welcome to the Nokia 4th Quarter and Full Year 2017 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen only mode. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Matt Shimau, Head of Investor Relations.
Sir, you may begin.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Nokia's 4th quarter and full year 2017 conference call. I'm Matt Shimao, Head of Nokia Investor Relations Rajeev Suri, President and CEO of Nokia and Christian Palola, CFO of Nokia are here in Espoo with me today. During this call, we will be making forward looking statements regarding the future business and financial performance of Nokia and its industry. These statements are predictions that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may therefore differ materially from the results we currently expect.
Factors that could cause such differences can be both external, such as general economic and industry conditions, as well as internal operating factors. We have identified such risks in more detail on Pages 67 through 85 of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 20 F, financial reports for Q4 and full year 2017 issued today, as well as our other filings with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Please note that our results release, the complete interim report with tables and the presentation on our website include non IFRS results information in addition to the reported results information.
Our complete financial report with tables available on our website includes a detailed explanation of the non IFRS information and a reconciliation between the non IFRS and the reported information. With that, Rajiv, over to you.
Thanks, Matt, and thanks to all of you for joining. There are 3 key topics that I would like to cover today. 1st, a high level overview of our Q4 and full year 2017 performance. 2nd, an update on some select parts of our company's strategy. And third, expected market conditions between now 2020 and how we expect Nokia to perform in those conditions.
I will do my best to be concise in each of these, so we have for Q and A as well. So jumping right into it, let me start with Q4. And I was pleased with our strong performance in the quarter, as well as with the fact that we delivered on our guidance for the year. At a group level, Q4 sales were up 5% in constant currency year on year. Group level operating margin was 15%, up 1 percentage point.
Group gross margin was a solid 41.4%. As you will recall, we said that net sales in our networks business would decline in line with our primary addressable market. For the full year, we ended with a year on year decline in network sales of 4% in constant currency versus an estimated market decline of a roughly similar magnitude. We said that we would deliver a Networks operating margin of 8% to 10% for full year 2017 and we landed at 8.3%. While we would have preferred to be closer to the high end of the range, we were constrained by a number of factors, namely robust competition in China increased investments we are making due to the opportunity provided by the accelerated timeframe of 5 gs deployments.
We said that we would deliver €1,200,000,000 in structural cost savings in full year 2018 and we remain on track to do just that. In the Q4, our network story was a good one. Year on year sales growth of 2% in constant currency, solid profitability despite the issues that I just mentioned, strong cash flow and significant progress with both our mobile portfolio and product migrations with key customers. Nokia Technologies also performed well in the quarter with strong year on year improvement in both net sales and operating profit driven by our licensing activities. We continue to move fast along our strategic roadmap for licensing and in the quarter successfully extended further into China, reaching an agreement with Huawei following an earlier deal with Xiaomi.
I was also pleased that we effectively addressed the net working capital issues that we saw in Q3 and ended the year with positive free cash flow, sharply reduced inventories and overdue receivables at the lowest level since we closed the acquisition of Alcatelucit. Our net cash increased in the quarter by €1,800,000,000 ending at €4,500,000,000 With that as an overview, let me take a minute or 2 to go a bit deeper into our Networks business groups and regions. Demonstrating the strength of our portfolio, 3 of our 5 Networks business groups, mobile networks, IP optical networks and applications and analytics grew in the quarter year on year on a constant currency basis. As you know, I flagged some issues related to product integration challenges in mobile networks in previous calls. Looking at the situation today, I think it is safe to say that we are coming back very fast.
Recent software releases have been at our highest quality levels ever. The performance of our Airscale product is extremely good. We announced recently that we will be working with NTT DOCOMO on 5 gs, the only foreign vendor to do so. And just yesterday, our 5 gs team made a true end to end call using 5 gs New Radio, the commercial version of 5 gs, not the pre specification test version. We believe that is an industry first and a remarkable achievement given that the spec was only finalized on December 21.
As further proof of our progress, we gained market share in 2017 in both 4 gs LTE and small cells, announcing important wins such as Altun Redas in Mexico, TIM in Brazil and China Unicom. Altun is a particularly pleasing project as it is truly end to end. We also see that we continue to win a disproportionate share of deals where we compete head to head against our major European competitor. These gains matter as 4 gs LTE footprint will have an impact on 5 gs market share. Of course, your 4 gs LTE installed base needs to be truly 5 gs ready and that means delivering the throughput that 5 gs will require.
As far as we can tell that will be a significant challenge for others, but easily addressed with our Airscale solution. You may have also seen the announcements on Monday about our end to end 5 gs Future X network architecture and our new ReefShark chipset. Both of these provide significant differentiation for Nokia as we head fast towards the transition to 5 gs. Take the 5 gs Future X architecture. Unlike 4 gs and previous generations of technology, 5 gs is very different.
It is not just about radio. In fact, it spans across the full network from mobile access to cloud core, from software defined networking to all forms of backhaul, fronthaul, IP routing, fixed networks, software and more. Customers know that in the face of this, they need to fundamentally reinvent their networks and do so by taking an architecture driven approach. Addressing individual parts of the network in isolation will simply not work. It requires a coordinated, holistic approach across all elements.
And that is where Nokia's 5 gs Future X architecture and end to end portfolio really become powerful differentiators. Then ReefShark, which is something that will be hard for competitors to match. It is the mobile network equivalent of our leading SP4 routing chip and has variants for both radio and baseband. While others can design their own silicon, it takes time and expertise. So if you get it right and we are confident that we have, you can deliver superior performing products that have a sustainable advantage for some time.
Why do you think we have it right with ReefShark? Well, we think because of several things. First, it is extraordinarily powerful, capable of meeting the densification needs of operators in the world's largest cities, increasing cell site throughput by a factor of 3 or when chained together, ReefShark can provide base stations up to a massive 6 terabits per second of throughput. 2nd, it is extraordinarily smart, leveraging Nokia Bell Labs artificial intelligence innovations to optimize radio resources and support network slicing. This will be critical to manage the 1,000 and even millions of end to end network slices that will come with 5 gs.
3rd, it is extraordinarily efficient, able to slash massive MIMO antenna size and power consumption in half and cut baseband power consumption by more than 60%. 4th, it is open with common interfaces and toolkits allowing customers the opportunity to access its AI capability, implement machine learning and deploy their own algorithms in their networks. Finally, it is easy to deploy. To upgrade your baseband, just plug it into our commercially available Airscale unit and off you go. Fast and effective capacity when you need it, truly powerful.
And you should know that it will start to ship in the Q3 of this year. I now want to move to other parts of our portfolio where the state of affairs is excellent. As you know, our SP4 based IP routing products are continuing to roll out and we believe they're at least 12 to 18 months ahead of competitive offerings. Our IP routing business grew in the last two quarters when you exclude the sales of third party products that we have been ramping down. We also have a strong optical portfolio range where we saw solid growth in the 4th quarter and we see that momentum continuing in the Q1.
In applications and analytics, which we are now renaming Nokia Software to reflect both our progress in and our longer term ambitions for that business. We have some unique assets. Our customer experience management capabilities are just one example. We are seeing customers abandon their existing suppliers to switch to us and this business closed 2017 with a solid order book and backlog going into 2018. On the Global Services side, our focus on discipline, automation and execution continues to show its power.
We have strong momentum in our high value professional services. We announced a large managed services deal with Optus after the end of the Q4 and we are moving quickly into new innovative service offerings. For example, consider Nokia's Worldwide IoT Network Grid or Wing, which is basically IoT as a managed service for service providers. We won our 1st significant Wing deal just after the quarter closed and you can expect to hear more about this at Mobile World Congress. In fixed networks, we are leading the way into virtualized access, having won the world's 1st major software defined access network or SDAN project in December.
Working with NBN in Australia, our solution will be used to manage Nokia nodes in the network as well as those of other suppliers. Now on to a regional view. And pleasingly in networks, we saw year on year constant currency sales growth in Q4 in 4 of our 6 regions. For the other 2, Middle East and Africa was roughly flat and North America was down 2%. For the sake of time, I will just comment on a few of our regions starting with North America.
Despite the decline in North America in Q4, year on year net sales improved significantly from Q3. We see some positive signals coming from North American customers and the desire to move fast to 5 gs is certainly there. India with a reported Asia Pacific market continues to be a standout performer with strong growth for the full year. The market has been strong with an intense battle between operators driving the need to invest in networks and Nokia is now the leading network vendor in India. Even as we gain share in the market, profitability remains strong.
As you know, we are not about share gain at any cost. Our Europe region delivered Q4 constant currency growth of 1% year on year, the first such performance in some time as we saw a pickup in parts of our end to end portfolio like routing, optical and software. While Europe is likely to remain soft given declines across 2 gs, 3 gs and 4 gs, we have a strong position in the market across our full portfolio and have made a number of underlying improvements to our operations that should benefit us in the coming months and years. In China, we saw good year on year growth in the 4th quarter. Given the robust competition in this market that I've talked about before, we continue to watch things closely with a focus on getting the right balance between market share and financial performance.
Now on to strategy, where we are progressing well and I would just like to highlight 2 areas. As you will recall, one pillar of our strategy is about creating new business opportunities in the consumer ecosystem. Execution in that area has been driven by Nokia Technologies, which is focused on 3 primary areas, digital media, digital health and licensing that covers our patents, technology and brand. We remain laser focused on those licensing licensing areas and are lowering our costs as we put less focus on consumer incubation. As you are aware, in early Q4, we announced that we would stop development of our primary product in digital media, the OZO professional virtual reality camera and shift to a technology licensing model.
With these steps, we expect to meaningfully reduce costs in Nokia Technologies in the near term. 2nd, a few comments on the good progress we are making in expanding into new segments beyond communication service providers. These segments spanning webscale companies, extra large enterprises that use technology as a competitive advantage and large players in transportation, energy and the public sector make up roughly 5% of our total sales today. And we are really gaining momentum in this area with year on year net sales up by 21% in Q4 and up by 13% for the full year when you exclude the Pomerall get loosened third party integration business that we are exiting. We ended the year with almost 100 new customers ranging from Phillips to Fujitsu and Korea Railroad Corporation to Accor Hotels.
Overall, we are tracking well against our strategy and we will continue to execute with focus and discipline in 2018. Now to the last topic I want to cover, market conditions and how we expect Nokia to perform in the context of those conditions. We are forecasting a decline in our primary addressable market in 2018, although at a slightly slower rate than our previous estimate, given early signs of improved conditions in North America. For 2019 2020, we expect market conditions to improve markedly, driven by full scale rollouts of 5 gs networks. In order to seize the opportunity presented by the acceleration of 5 gs, we plan to invest approximately €100,000,000 in 2018 to meet near term customer requirements for early 5 gs trials.
This investment combined with overall market conditions this year will mean that our operating margin will come under some pressure in 2018, but we see a clear path to stronger performance in 2019 and even more in 2020. Specifically, we expect an earnings per share in 2020 of €0.37 to €0.42 For full year 2020, we're also targeting clearly positive recurring free cash flow much closer to non IFRS earnings as restructuring and product migrations come to an end, as well as in non IFRS operating margin at the group level of 12% to 16% and 9% to 12% for Networks. If we execute our strategy well, the high end of those ranges is certainly possible. That is a sharp improvement from today, but there are a number of reasons why we believe it is possible. 1st, as I said, the market is expected to return to growth led by 5 gs and strong growth across all our addressable segments.
As I noted earlier, our end to end 5 gs FutureX portfolio and excellent product lineup across our business groups will serve us well in 5 gs. And in fact, I expect that we will increase our 5 gs share versus what we had in 4 gs, given the strength of our end to end portfolio and the many opportunities that 5 gs offers our portfolio. 2nd, we expect strong growth to continue in the expand part of our strategy, the path that is focused on non communication service provider customers. The need for mission critical high performance network continues to grow as companies and public sector organizations everywhere digitize their operations. The growth that we have already experienced in these segments gives us confidence about the future as there is no reason to expect the digitization trend to slow anytime soon.
3rd, we are gaining momentum in the structurally more attractive software market And while our focus today is largely on new sales to communication service providers, that is where the near term opportunity is the greatest. We will start to accelerate our efforts to provide software solutions to our other vertical markets. 4th, group support functions, information technology, real estate and the consumer incubation elements within Nokia Technologies are all areas where further cost reduction potential remains. And we see opportunities for further structural cost reductions after 2018. As we move to put integration related savings behind us, we will turn our attention to these areas.
5th, we are confident that our highly profitable licensing business in Nokia Technologies still has room to grow sales, and we expect a CAGR of between of 10% between now and the end of 2020. A combination of license renewals, new licensees in the mobile devices sector and extensions into new segments such as automotive and brand licensing will all be part of driving this growth. I know that's a lot to absorb, so just a quick recap. Nokia delivered well in the Q4 and ended the full year with improved group level performance compared to the previous year. We are moving fast and successfully to put the portfolio integration challenges in mobile networks behind us.
We have a highly competitive set of products and services ideally suited to the world of 5 gs. We expect 2018 to be challenging from a market perspective and due to the acceleration of near term 5 gs investments. We expect those investments to pay off and in 2020, we believe we will be positioned to deliver strong financial performance including significant EPS growth. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Christian for more on our financials. Christian?
Thank you, Rajiv. There are 4 main topics that I intend to cover today. 1st, cash and capital structure 2nd, taxes 3rd, a few words on financial income and expense and the value of our venture fund investments and 4th, I'll walk you through our guidance. Starting with our cash performance in the 4th quarter. On a sequential basis, Nokia's net cash and other liquid assets increased by approximately €1,800,000,000 with a quarter end balance of €4,500,000,000 Our good performance in Q4 helped us achieve slightly positive free cash flow in the full year when we exclude the one off cash flow items related to Apple, the German tax case and the premiums related to our bond renewals as we had guided for.
On a net basis, these one off items generated a positive cash flow of approximately €1,300,000,000 in the full year 2017. In Q4, Nokia's operating activities resulted in an increase in net cash of approximately €2,000,000,000 This was primarily due to an approximately EUR 1,200,000,000 decrease in net working capital. As I discussed last quarter, we heightened our focus on working capital in Q4 by introducing clear additional controls and governance, and this led to improved performance in receivables, inventories and liabilities. 1st, on the decrease in receivables. We sharpened our focus on overdue collections and increased the sale of receivables from an exceptionally low level in Q3.
As a result, we managed to bring our overdue receivables to their lowest level since the closing of the Alcatel Lucent acquisition. In addition, we also received the payment related to the LG arbitration in Q4, which we highlighted as a headwind in Q3. 2nd, the decrease in inventories. Focus on customer specific inventories and industry seasonality drove inventories in the 4th drove inventories down in the 4th quarter. However, they still remain higher compared to the year ago quarter as we have built up inventory for our planned network equipment swap outs.
As we execute the swaps, I expect inventory levels to continue to decline in 2018. And third, the increase in liabilities. While the progress was partly related to improved payment terms, it is also good to note that most of the payables increase was seasonal in nature. In Q4, we had approximately EUR 130,000,000 cash outflows related to share repurchases. With that, we completed our EUR 1,000,000,000 share repurchase repurchase program as well as our EUR 7,000,000,000 capital structure optimization program, which we announced back in October 2015.
Regarding our planned capital structure actions for 2018, as discussed last quarter, Nokia's Board of Directors will propose a dividend of €0.19 per share for 2017. While our 2018 operating performance is expected to come under some pressure, this is largely due to the acceleration of 5 gs and the investments that Nokia is making to be in a strong position to grow and expand operating margins and EPS in the following year. Therefore, the Board is committed to proposing a growing dividend, including for 2018. Also, we have today reiterated our target to distribute approximately 40% to 70% of non IFRS EPS to shareholders on a longer term basis, taking into account Nokia's cash position and expected cash flow generation. Moving then to an update on taxes.
Our 2017 non IFRS tax rate benefited from favorable regional profit mix coming in at an unusually low 19%. Taxes were challenging to forecast in 2017 due to the implementation of our new operating model. Looking into 2018, as detailed in our guidance issued today, we expect our non IFRS tax rate to be approximately 30% 25% over the longer term. Our tax guidance for 2018 compared to 2017 is primarily driven by our expectations for Nokia's regional profit mix as well as our overall level of profits. Our guidance does incorporate the lower corporate tax rate in the U.
S, but this benefit will be partly offset in the short term by the new BEAT provision imposed by the U. S. On foreign companies. We are in the process of determining whether our current operating model is the best possible given the recent U. S.
Tax changes. Due to the lower future tax rate in the U. S, we remeasured our U. S. Based deferred tax assets.
Primarily as a result of this, we had an approximately €740,000,000 negative non cash impact in Q4. However, the important thing to note here is that this does not affect the amount of taxable profits that we can shelter in the future using our tax assets in the U. S, thus no cash flow change. Regarding cash taxes, we expect these to be approximately €450,000,000 in 2018 and over the longer term. Continuing to financial income and expenses, where we see some accounting standard related changes in 2018.
Following the implementation of new IFRS standards on revenue and financial instruments, a number of new items start flowing through financial income and expense, such as the financing component of customer contracts as well as the fees related to the sale of receivables. As a result of these changes, we expect our FIE in full year 2018 to increase to approximately €300,000,000 subject to FX and interest rate volatility and assuming that our debt portfolio remains unchanged. However, due to some non cash items, our cash outflows related to FIE are expected to come in at approximately €200,000,000 IFRS 9, the standard for financial instruments, has a meaningful impact that I would like to spend a minute on. Due to changes in this standard, we need to transfer the unrealized positive fair valuation of approximately €200,000,000 related to our venture fund investments from comprehensive income directly to retained earnings at the beginning of 2018. This means that the potential realization of these gains will not be visible in our operative P and L or in FIE in 2018 or in future years due to the IFRS 9 transition rules.
That said, going forward, the quarterly fair valuation changes on our venture fund investments will be booked through our operative P and L, potentially causing some volatility. As a reminder, the carrying amount of our overall venture fund investments totaled approximately €660,000,000 at the end of 2017. Turning finally to our cost savings target and the rest of our key guidance items. We remain committed to delivering EUR 1,200,000,000 of recurring annual cost savings in the full year 2018, of which SEK800 1,000,000 is expected to come from operating expenses. We continue to track well with our plans towards these goals.
In 2018, our €1,200,000,000 of recurring annual cost savings is expected to be partly offset by approximately €100,000,000 of incremental expenses related to 5 gs customer trials. It is important to note, however, that these expenses are temporary and are mainly related to materials and deployments and are specific to 2018 and will thus no longer impact our results in 2019 and onwards. We have today reiterated also our guidance for the overall planned network equipment swaps to total €1,400,000,000 On a cumulative basis, €600,000,000 of this amount has been recorded so far, and we expect a clear majority of the swaps to be completed by the end of 2018. For Nokia overall, we are now providing EPS and operating margin guidance. We are doing this to help you understand the progress that we are making as a total company.
In 2018, we expect our non IFRS diluted earnings per share to be approximately €0.23 to €0.27 and non IFRS operating margin to be in the range of 9% to 11%. In 2020, largely due to expectations of improved results in both our Networks business as well as Nokia Technologies, along with lower support function costs, we expect non IFRS diluted earnings per share to grow to approximately €0.37 to €0.42 and non IFRS operating margin for Nokia to improve to a range of 12% to 16%. Regarding the guidance for our Networks business, on a constant currency, we now expect the decline in our primary market to be 2% to 4% in 2018 compared to 2017. This is slightly better than our earlier guidance for a decline of approximately 2% to 5%, and this is due to early signs of improved conditions in the U. S.
Markets since October when we gave our initial market commentary for 2018. While we expect net sales to decline approximately in line with our primary market, over the long term, we expect our networks business to grow far there than the primary market as we leverage our end to end product portfolio to increase share of wallet in the 5 gs area, continue to gain traction in the targeted adjacencies and make further progress building a standalone software business. We expect operating margin in our Networks business to be in the range of 6% to 9% in full year 2018, influenced by, among factors, the decline in our primary market. Also, as I discussed earlier, we expect 2018 operating margin to be temporary affected by approximately €100,000,000 incremental expenses related to 5 gs customer trials. Looking into the future, we expect operating margin for our Networks business to improve to a range of 9% to 12% in 2020.
This margin expansion is enabled largely by growth expectations we have for our Networks business, greater R and D productivity as we implement new ways of working and cut down the number of legacy platforms and by lower support function costs. Finally, a few words on our guidance on our licensing business. Given the progress we have made over the past 2 years and the experience we have gained, we are now comfortable providing some longer term guidance. We expect our recurring licensing net sales to grow at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 10% over the 3 year period ending 2020. At the same time, we expect the operating margin for our licensing business to expand to approximately 85% for the full year 2020, partly due to operational efficiencies.
You can find a detailed description of the drivers for our expected financial performance in the outlook
For the Q and A session, please limit yourself to one question only. Nicole, please go ahead.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer Our first question comes from Andrew Gardiner of Barclays. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Mine is really around your 2020 assumptions, specifically in Networks and on the revenue side of things. The guidance you've given for this current year, 2018, clearly takes into account the final stage of the cost savings and the increase in 5 gs related spending you've mentioned. So it seems like the margin improvement you're looking for over the next 2 years to 2020 is almost entirely driven by the revenue growth.
And you guys are sounding a lot more confident there today than you did back in October or certainly at the Capital Markets Day sort of 15 months ago and again in stark contrast perhaps to how Ericsson framed things yesterday. So I'm just wondering about your own visibility there. Is this your view on the market? Is it related to visibility on contracts? Are you getting a better idea as to deployment time lines from a broader range of customers, better idea on pricing for 5 gs?
What is it that's underlining that confidence that you're presenting today? Thank you.
Maybe I'll start and Rajiv can then complement. So we do as I said in my prepared remarks, we do see that the improvement in our networks margin 2018 to 2020 comes from 3 factors: 1, the growth expectations we have for the business 2, the greater R and D productivity that we see as we implement new ways of working and cut down the number of legacy platforms and 3, by lower support function costs.
Yes. Thanks, Andrew. I'll just add. So we have a good emerging sense of what will happen with regard to 5 gs and in what countries. Yes, it will start with the lead countries, U.
S, China, Japan, South Korea, Nordics, some parts of Europe will follow. But we're getting a good sense of what that is going to be like. It is clear the demand is there on the basis of capacity increase. It is also clear that the demand is there from the B2B environment because industrial companies, utilities, transportation companies, they're really asking our operators to give them 5 gs capability given capacity, latency requirements and so on. Now of course, we look at it differently from another peer or some other peers because we have an end to end portfolio.
This really is a reinvention of the network as we know it. Our operators, if they go end to end with us, will get the benefit of a lower DCO, so total cost of ownership, a higher throughput at the network level, not just at the radio level, but at the network level. Think about ReefShark and SP4 and all that being provided together, it will give a higher throughput, higher gains, higher user experience to their customers, higher capability to manage this emerging capacity and traffic, but also much lower power consumption across the network. I give you another quick example in terms of a real opportunity for operators, network slicing. There will be thousands and thousands of network slicing, perhaps millions in the future.
And our operators will be able to tap into the demand of an SLA based business that they can give slices to industrials, group of clinics and hospitals and so on, both regionally and globally for some of the global operators. And we would be able to slice a network at the network level. Somebody else who doesn't have the end to end portfolio would only be able to supply do that at the core network of the radio and that's just simply not good enough.
Great. Thank you, Andrew. Nicole, we'll take the next question please.
Our next question comes from Robert Sanders of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Yes, good afternoon. My question is just really around a bit more on 5 gs, I'm afraid. You say that you think you can increase share in 5 gs versus 4 gs, but your 4 gs share was already pretty high. I think it's quite clearly number 1 already. So I'm just trying to reconcile that ambition with the idea that China could be a much bigger part of 5 gs versus 4 gs in the near term, probably around 50% of the market by 2020 to by subscribers.
So are you gaining in China? Or do you think you're just going to be the dominant player in markets like Korea, Japan and the U. S?
Thanks. Of course, U. S. Will be fairly big in that same timeframe. There will be Japan, there will be South Korea, where, as you know, we have a strong presence and also the fact that Nordics and some of the European markets are also going to step up to 5 gs.
But your question about market share, again, we're not trying to look at 5 gs radio market share alone. This is a real opportunity, perhaps much more than any technology in the past 4 gs or others to get a higher share of wallet with these customers by giving them that end to end network architecture benefit of which I gave a couple of examples just with the last question. It's a real opportunity. It's much different from 4 gs. We're already getting all that cross selling with 4 gs in many markets, but I'm looking at share of wallet increase with the key customers that will move into 5 gs.
Thank you, Rob. Nicole, next question please.
Our next question comes from Sandeep Deshpande of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Yes. Hi, Rajiv. Thanks for letting me on. My question is regarding this transition to 5 gs as well. We've seen your competitor being very aggressive in the market.
They have put out some press releases in the last quarter on share gains. Do you see a repeat of the scenario that occurred from 2010 to 2012, where there was a lot of price based competition in the market and that caused a significant margin impact to all the companies in the space? And secondly, does this have any impact on your gross margin?
Thanks, Sandeep. It's all a question of balance. So we don't want to lead with price. We will lead with our end to end portfolio. Again, again, the points I just made earlier.
And this is really compelling. We'll lead with FE4, Reef Shark, because ReefShark, this chipset that's coming later in the year gives very tangible benefits. For instance, massive MIMO antennas will be halved in size, which means you can do volume MIMO antennas that you can't do today. So of course, it's a question of balance. We have this pricing discipline.
We've got a centralized limits of authority. Yes, it is true in some markets, it could happen with the new technology that every time you go in, it could get aggressive in some parts. Having said that, we have to remember that 4 gs and 3 gs and other technologies as they mature at this stage, margins expand because there isn't that same competitive intensity in that business. So it's a question of using the end to end, the 4 gs, 5 gs balance, but you know that we will not take share at any cost. We have to be very disciplined there.
Thank you, Sandeep. Nicole, next question please.
Our next question comes from Richard Kramer of Arete Research. Please go ahead.
Thanks very much. Rajeev, the logic of buying Alcatel nearly 3 years ago was both to add products and customer footprint. And I think you can accept that even for us analysts, it's been a confusing picture and a lot of fits and starts. Can you now back up your sort of apparent confidence by committing to having a reckoning of the Alcatel deal, not just as a defensive move, but proving the sort of positive case for the acquisition, balancing the swaps and the restructuring costs, which have gone up, but also reflecting maybe by the end of the year at a CMD, what you see as the expected cash flows and the opportunities in routing and optics and also specifically to the way in which you've added to your radio footprint, especially in North America?
Yes. Thanks, Richard. So perhaps Christian can add. But we are seeing a lot more cross sell now. Altair and Redas was a case that was truly end to end.
It is an example of someone that goes in and starts a whole new network that end to end is beneficial. So we got full end to end in the areas we are present in. We are seeing in Japan, recently won a meaningful fixed deal on the back of being there in mobile. The Entybe DOCOMO 5 gs business that we're doing, we're providing transport, we're providing routing, and then we see fixed opportunities in South Korea where we've been very strong in mobile. And again, India is already demonstrating whether it's Varti or Reliance or others that our end to end is getting more traction.
And as I said, given that 5 gs is a fundamental reinvention, the opportunity becomes greater in that case as well. And then of course, we are getting expansion into web scale. That's a real opportunity in terms of cloud providers with the IP routing business as you go into SP4. And then there's also the enterprise opportunity where we're doing well with 21% growth in Q4, 13% overall last year. So we are now well positioned for structurally attractive market expansion.
And some of the hassles we've had around the mobile network roadmap that I've talked about in the past, we're significantly making progress. The Airscale product that's out there in the field is getting much better throughput, uplink and downlink, and the migrations are in full swing. So when we get to the other side of the hump, we will have a lot more capacity in R and D and mobile alone just to compete with everybody else in the marketplace too.
No, I think you said it, Rajiv, well. So clearly, kind of the truly global footprint now gives us scale. The end to end portfolio gives us that competitive advantage going into 5 gs. It enables us to go after the adjacencies and leverage the R and D spend that we do for the operator customers outside of that customer space when connectivity becomes more relevant also for enterprises in general. And clearly, the 1st years of the integration has also happened in a market environment, which has been much slower than what we anticipated when going into the deal.
And with 5 gs, we do expect that, that will reverse some to some extent.
Okay. Thank you, Richard, for your question. Nicole, next question, please.
Our next question comes from David Mulholland of UBS. Please go ahead.
Hi, thanks very much. So just to change tack a little bit into the Technologies business. Obviously, the first time you're giving a more longer term comment on the growth in the licensing side of it from €1,300,000,000 to grow 10% per annum. Can you maybe just help us to understand the building blocks of that in terms of what of the $1,300,000,000 base needs to be renewed at some stage? What of it might be expiring and not returning?
And how much of it is kind of new opportunities that gives you the confidence in growth over that time horizon?
Yes, let me just thanks, David. Let me just start with giving you the roadmap first. So we have made our first entries into China with Xiaomi and then Huawei. We see more licensees to be signed up in China, players that are growing fast in the mobile devices space. India is next, again similar sort of opportunities with moving into mobile device players.
India is smaller than China, of course. And then there is the automotive sector, where we've already started to do a lot of groundwork. And then comes the IoT, consumer electronics, broadcast, that sort of space. And then there's brand licensing. So that's the overall roadmap.
And again, I think as we said in our guidance, the 10% CAGR takes into account the fact that, as Rajiv said, it's about the new deals, but it's also about renewing the ones that will expire during that time period. So there are some that will expire, and there are some that will not expire. We have decided not to go into detail on when our deals expire and when not.
Thank you, David. And the call next question please.
Our next question comes from Simon Leopold of Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Great. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to shift to the IP Networks and Applications segment and see if we can get a better understanding of the longer term trends in light of the fact that routing was a bit weaker in the Q4, but optical much better. I don't want to necessarily make the assumption that 4Q paints the picture for the next 2 years. Can you help us understand how you see those two particular business units trending in 2018 and what the drivers are?
Wondering when routing returns to year over year growth? Thank you.
On an underlying basis, Simon, IP routing grew in Q4 if you exclude the 3rd party resale that we've been winding down and also grew in Q3. So we've now had 2 quarters of growth in constant currency excluding third party. Optical was stronger in Q4. So for IP routing, for us, FP4 now gives an opportunity. And of course, when FP4 is out there, FP3 also gains momentum because you now have a competitive offering.
So we see cloud players as the option for core routing in particular with SP4. We see enterprise, so utilities, transportation, public sector, these are all areas we're getting traction. Larger enterprises that use technology as competitive advantage think banks or financial institutions. Then of course service providers and as I commented mobile backhaul, edge routing access, all of that will get a possible tailwind when 5 gs comes on stream. And this comment is a little bit beyond 2018.
On software, Nokia software, which is ANA, which is the other part of IP Networks and Applications, there we have a good order backlog. We've had good growth recently. The Comtel portfolio is really helping. The software sales force is in place. The quality of that sales force is high.
And the fact also that this we are putting all of our software portfolio in that business unit on a common software foundation, which makes the product faster to sell and also more capable to deliver. And all of these things will help that business, especially with the stronger order backlog.
I think then on the optical side, clearly, good quarter in Q4. It's still a business where we drive for further scale to drive up the profitability. It is a market which will benefit from the investments needed for 5 gs. It's also a market where we feel good about the competitiveness of the product offering that we have. And it's those two things that helped execute a good Q4.
Great. Okay. Thank you, Simon. Nicole, next question please.
Our next question comes from Sebastian Tablitz of Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead.
Hello. A question on Networks margin. You've targeted in the past in Networks 10% to 15% clean operating margin for the midterm. Is it still a valid target or valid objective beyond 2020? And also on the 5 gs fixed wireless access technology, have you noticed any cannibalization impact from this technology on your traditional fixed access business and notably in the U.
S. Where one big operator will deploy this kind of technology in the coming months? Thank you.
Yes. So the 10% to 15%, yes, absolutely, that remains a long term objective. We have been specific about 2020 in terms of guidance, but we will continue to aim for more. On the fixed wireless access, no, in fact, we think that 5 gs will provide momentum to fixed business in general, fixed wireless access as well. We have actually a combined fixed wireless product in that space.
It's a new portfolio for us to diversify into. And then if you look at fixed, we are fortunate to have multiple forms of backhaul. PON is an interesting way to do backhaul, especially in countries like Japan. And then there's optical and then there's microwave. And by the way, also the IP routing portfolio has mobile backhaul.
So and then there's fronthaul with optical as well. So all of those could get momentum with the oncoming expansion into 5 gs.
Gs. Thank you, Sebastian. Next question please.
Our next question comes from a call of Satanya of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.
Hi, good afternoon. Just one clarification on the technologies or rather licensing targets for 2020. So if I understand this right, you've got $1,300,000,000 of revenues last year, which is non recurring in licensing, probably $150,000,000 of that is Microsoft, which is all paid for the next like few years. So like to grow 30% from that base in spite of a huge FX headwind, you probably need to grow like almost like 40%, which is like another €400,000,000 €500,000,000 on top of €1,100,000,000 So I'm just trying to understand that given you've already signed deals with almost like top 6, 7 brands in handsets who account for like maybe 70%, 75% of industry revenues, like what gives you that kind of visibility that especially that we haven't seen instances of licensing model work in consumer electronics or IoT or automotive so far? Like are you already in advanced stages with some of these customers or negotiations, which gives you that kind of confidence?
Thank you.
Yes. Let me just start by making sure that we are talking about the same numbers. So you're right that the 10% growth guidance in is on top of that $1,300,000,000 number that includes Microsoft now and is expected to include Microsoft also in 2020 because if you recall, the Microsoft deal is the only one where we have been very specific on the term, and it was a 10 year deal at the time of the sale of the devices business to Microsoft. So that's going to be included in both numbers, both the base as well as the number in 2020. And then as Rajeev said, the growth we see coming from additional opportunities with the Chinese vendors from India, from automotive, from IoT and consumer devices as well as then the opportunity we see in brand licensing.
And it is true that when automotives get connected, the connected car opportunity is there. And I think there is we have momentum to prove that there will be a clear opportunity to sign up those licensees in due course. Good.
Yes. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I'd just like to have a little update on CapEx. This is the 2nd consecutive hike.
Could you tell us where this extra funding is going? Because we previously had like €500,000,000 run rate around €700,000,000 for this year. So it's quite substantial. So if you could be a bit more precise on that. And just a quick update as well on FirstNet.
What's your share there in the U. S? Is it going to make a meaningful impact in 2018? Thank you.
I think on the CapEx side, I don't think there is any drama on that. I think we do see that CapEx and depreciation is going to be at equal levels. Then you have some kind of annual uptick there from time to time. Now we have an additional €100,000,000 planned for this year, which is not in the longer term €600,000,000 number, but no, nothing specific.
Yes. And on FirstNet, Alexander, that one, yes, it could have an impact in 2018. All states are opting in, so that's good news. And effectively, we would get our typical market share with AT and T, at least that's our target as those things progress.
Thank you, Alex. Nicole, next question please.
Our next question comes from Tim Long of BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Rajeev, just wanted to ask on the standalone software business. I think that's one of the goals to get that business ramping a little bit more. Could you talk a little bit about the investment needed or the go to market that might need to shift to get that business to become more relevant? And do you have all the technologies in house that you need to make that business successful?
Thank you.
Thanks, Tim. Yes, clearly, we have spent much of 2017 to put that sales force in place to get the right talent from outside from companies like Oracle and Amdocs and NICE Systems and so on. So we're in the right space. These people go and sell to CMOs and CIOs in the operator community, not just to the CTO. And of course, we have that end channel.
So that's in place. And we continue to renew and refresh that talent to where needed to ensure that it's of the right quality. So I'm feeling good about the software sales force. And then of course, what's very important for us is the common software foundation so that all of our portfolio can sit on that one common software foundation that's what best in class software companies do and we're well on track to get all of our portfolio on that software foundation. And yes, so it's looking good.
The order backlog was good as I said. We came into growth in Q4 again. There are bolt on type acquisitions we might look at in that space to continue to fill the portfolio. We're seeing more interest in OSS transformation deals. We're seeing interest in IoT platform plus application enablement type deals both towards verticals as well as towards operators.
We're seeing VSS transformation deals. So our portfolio is in good shape and the Comtel acquisition actually has really moved the opportunity. The pipeline is pretty strong with regard to Comtel on the base of our customers
that Comtel didn't have. Okay. Thank you, Tim. Nicole, I think we have time for one more question today.
Our next question comes from Amit Harshindani of Citigroup. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon, everyone. Amit Harshandani from Citi and thanks for taking my question. My question relates to your 2020 outlook. I was curious to understand what are the assumptions you have made with respect to the customer landscape the landscape for communication service providers as you take this vision out to 2020? What are your assumptions efficiency measures, potential consolidation activity?
I know it's a difficult task, but I'm just trying to understand the level of conservatism baked in at the 12% versus optimism baked in at 15%. Your latest thoughts on the consumer landscape would be helpful. Thank you.
Thanks, Amir. Yes.
So again, I think it's a relevant question. It's one of the things that we have looked at when thinking about kind of who will we sell to in that time frame, that's where also the strategy comes in. There are, of course, assumptions baked in when it comes to how much of the overall connectivity spend will be done by operators and done by enterprise and web scale outside of that as well as then in which markets we will see what type of moves. But that's kind of a put and take assessment and part of the overall assumptions that we've used. I don't think we can go into much more specifics there.
Okay. Well, in that case, thank you for your questions today. And I'd like to turn the call back to Rajiv for closing comments.
Thank you, Matt and Christian, and thank you to all of you for your questions. To briefly summarize, I'm pleased with where Nokia landed in Q4 and closed the year. The fact that we were able to turn around the networking capital issues that we experienced in the Q3 demonstrates the execution power of Nokia, as does the speed at which we have addressed the portfolio integration challenges in mobile networks. 2018 will be another challenging year and tapping the opportunity of 5 gs requires additional near term investment. I am confident, however, that our investment will deliver the right future results.
We are not interested in investments without returns nor in gaining share without profits. That approach is embedded in our DNA. So while we will compete aggressively and expect to continue to win more than our fair share of deals, we will always stay focused on creating real value for our shareholders. And we believe the value is there to be created and have a high degree of confidence that the guidance we gave for 2020 is achievable. Now we will go and get it done.
With that, Matt, back over to you.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our conference call. I would like to remind you that during the conference call today, we have made a number of forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may therefore differ materially from the results currently expected. Factors that could cause such differences can be both external, such as general economic and industry conditions as well as internal operating factors. We have identified these in more detail on Pages 67 through 85 of our 2016 Annual Reports on Form 20 F, our financial report for Q4 and full year 2017 issued today as well as our other filings with the U.
S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Thank you.