Good morning, welcome to our 2020 interim results presentation. I'm going to give a short presentation on the progress the bank has made in the first half of 2020, after which I will provide a more detailed review of our financial performance. I'll be happy to take any questions after that. If we turn to slide three, with regard to the highlights.
The first half of 2020 has been an unprecedented period of time, where customer and colleague experience have changed so profoundly. The sudden outbreak of COVID-19 in March of this year has impacted the bank's operational and financial performance. The strength built up in the bank's balance sheet and business model has ensured that we are able to support our customers and the Irish economy.
We've approved more than 10,500 mortgage payment breaks, equating to EUR 1.6 billion in loan value, and that represents 10% of the bank's gross loan book. The average loan size of a payment break is around EUR 152,000, and the average yield is 2.8%. At the end of July, we've seen a 50% reduction in the number of active payment breaks since they peaked in May of this year.
Business performance started the year very well, in particular in mortgage lending, before the country's response to COVID-19 impacted all new lending activity. The bank wrote EUR 600 million in total new lending in the first half of the year. This is a reduction of 16% when compared to the same period in 2019. Total new mortgage lending of EUR 530,000 reduced by 14% year-on-year.
The mortgage market itself reduced by 16%, and as a result, our market share increased to 15.2%, up from 14.7% in the first six months of 2019. In recent days, we've announced significant changes to our mortgage pricing for both new and existing customers. These rate reductions go a long way to addressing the discrepancy which traditionally existed between the bank's pricing for new and existing customers, and combines enhanced competitiveness with increased fairness.
The bank is reporting a loss before tax of EUR 530 million, which compares to a profit before tax of EUR 28 million for the same period last year. Operating profit of EUR 23 million for the first half, compares to operating profit of EUR 47 million in the prior year, with net interest income reducing by 6% year-on-year.
The bank's net interest margin of 175 basis points is showing a decrease of seven basis points on the previous six months of 2019, and a five basis points reduction versus the 2019 outturn. I'll cover this in more detail in the financial summary. Underlying operating expenses, excluding regulatory costs and costs directly associated with COVID-19, were EUR 142 million.
That's EUR 3 million or 2% lower year-on-year. As the bank continues a strong discipline and cost management, reflecting their lower cost. Regulatory charges were EUR 20 million for the first half. This is EUR 2 million higher than the previous period. This is due to the higher level of insured deposit balances. The total impairment charge for the first half was EUR 75 million. This compares to a EUR 5 million charge for the same period in 2019.
The impairment charge is largely driven by the update of the macroeconomic inputs to reflect the impact of COVID-19 on the longer-term economic outlook. Non-performing loans were EUR 1.1 billion, and that remains broadly in line with the balances as at the end of 2019. The NPL ratio increased slightly to 6.8%, from the 6.4% level at the end of 2019.
The bank continues to actively manage the NPL portfolio and is still committed to reducing the NPL ratio to mid-single digits in the medium term while protecting capital. The Common Equity Tier 1 ratio was 13.9% and 16.5% on a fully loaded and transitional basis, respectively.
This compares to the bank's proforma CET1 ratio of 15% and 18.1% as at the end of 2019 on a fully loaded and transitional basis, respectively. Capital ratios remain above management and regulatory minimums.
The reduction in capital ratios is primarily driven by the increase in the impairment charge and a prudent increase in the bank's Risk-Weighted Assets associated with the payment break population. The Central Bank of Ireland has provided additional flexibility to the banks under their supervision in the context of the COVID-19 crisis.
This is designed to support the sustainable provision of credit to the economy. We now turn to slide four. COVID-19 has caused a sudden and severe contraction in economic activity across the world.
The global health pandemic quickly became a global economic crisis. Job losses came in waves aligned to the increasing levels of public health restrictions, the greatest impact coming from sectors such as construction, retail, hospitality, and leisure.
The number in receipt of the Pandemic Unemployment Payment peaked in early May at more than 600,000, has declined over the last eight weeks to around 290,000. Following a sharp increase in job loss across all sectors, the labor market is expected to begin to recover in line with the phased reopening of the economy.
However, the labor force is expected to be smaller over the forecast horizon, with unemployment estimated at around 12% by the end of this year. Employment growth is estimated to be at 9% in 2021, bringing the forecast unemployment rate back to around 8% by the end of 2021, These are still well above the pre-COVID-19 levels. We now turn to slide five. Household deposits now stand at an all-time high, recently reported at EUR 118 billion.
This suggests that households have a significant source of funds to support a future recovery in consumer spending. Demand for credit declined in March following the introduction of the initial containment measures, with a significant low reported in mid-April. Demand since then has picked up, showing signs of recovery, especially in consumer credit.
Mortgage inquiries remained subdued through April and May. There's been a good recovery in applications since early June. The latest data on residential property market transactions suggests that activity is returning to more normal levels. Updates to the property price register at the end of July showed an increase week-on-week. However, activity is still 30% below the 2019 levels.
The mortgage market, having grown to EUR 9.6 billion in 2019, is now expected to decrease by 26% to around EUR 7 billion in 2020, before expected growth of about 20% in 2021 to a market size of EUR 8.4 billion. House completions of 21,800 in 2019 are expected to be much lower, with estimates of 13,800 house completions in 2020, and that's a decrease of 37% year-on-year.
House prices were forecast to reduce by up to 10%, with some recovery in 2021. However, we've yet to witness these reductions in the market, with some commentators suggesting a lower impact. If we now turn to slide six. As mentioned at the outset, the bank is fully committed to supporting our customers, colleagues, and communities through the COVID-19 pandemic. Proactive measures were undertaken from early 2020 to protect the health and welfare of our colleagues and customers.
We've put in place a range of supports for our customers, including the approval of 10,500 mortgage payment breaks to give our customers the financial breathing space they needed at a time of crisis, the introduction of an online portal to facilitate mortgage and term loan payment breaks, in the coming weeks, this portal will also offer online statements of financial suitability or SFS returns.
That's required for processing customers who require assistance at the end of payment break, too. Excuse me. We've also offered customers temporary overdraft and credit card limit increases, we've given over EUR 1 million in cash back in incentives and rewards to Explore Account customers. We've increased the limit on contactless payments from EUR 30 -EUR 50 per transaction, facilitating customers to pay using their card as a safer option during these unprecedented times.
Arising from this, 92% of customers are now using contactless payments over cash. Around 40 million contactless payments were made by customers since the beginning of the year, and as a result, we've experienced a 60% reduction in over-the-counter cash during the first six months. In addition, we've kept all of our branches open to serve our customers.
We deployed over 100 staff and mobilized four new regional centers to further support in answering customer queries. Our colleagues' response to the COVID-19 pandemic is a reflection of the positive customer-focused culture in the bank, as over 100,000 of our branch colleagues worked face-to-face with customers daily to provide an essential service to people right across the country and with no bank location closing.
We also introduced priority banking hours for elderly and vulnerable customers and kitted out all our branches with social distancing and hygiene measures. COVID-19 has accelerated the move towards digital channels for both our customers and our colleagues. Personal service will remain at the heart of everything we do.
However, as both customer and colleague experience have changed so profoundly, digital will play an ever-increasing role in our service offering and our future ways of working. 72% of customers are now choosing to bank using online channels, and we've seen a 43% increase in mobile app logins versus last year.
The teams across technology were focused heavily on providing a quick response to both customers and colleagues, building a COVID-19 portal on our website and enabling over 1,200 of our colleagues to work from home within a very short period of time. We introduced Zoom and Webex functionality as well as Skype for Business with instant messaging and chat, enhancing communication from remote sites.
Communication was indeed a main focus of the bank because we kept colleagues informed as the weeks progressed, and the bank issued more than 150 internal communications, which was welcomed by all during these unusual times. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated many trends that we were already seeing, and we will be looking over the coming years at how both the workforce and the workplace may change in the future.
The immediate actions taken by the bank to support customers during the pandemic has been recognized by our customers, and we're pleased to say that the bank's relationship Net Promoter Score, or NPS score, and that's the degree to which our existing customers recommend us to potential customers, has increased to a score of plus 14, and that's a clear first in the market as at the end of June. If we now turn to slide seven.
When I was appointed chief executive some weeks ago, I spoke of my pride in the community roots of this bank, roots that stretch back over 200 years to the building society and trustee savings bank movements of long ago. Despite these unprecedented times, I do believe that we have all the ingredients to become a clear number 3 in the market.
In my first six weeks as CEO, I've set out a new purpose for the organization, which is centered on building trust with our customers and connecting with the bank's community heritage. Our purpose is to work hard every day to build trust with customers and to ensure that we live up to our promise of being a community that serves the community.
We will do this by building a sustainable organization that is transparent and fair with customers. Our ambition is to be Ireland's best personal and small business bank. Best doesn't necessarily mean biggest, but it does mean being the best at what we do for both our personal and business customers.
To achieve this ambition, we will be focused on a number of key priorities, including increasing loyalty with our customers, enhancing our digital capability, embedding an open, inclusive, and risk-aware culture, simplifying our business.
By focusing on doing the right things, I've no doubt that we can build a successful and profitable bank that we can all be proud of. To achieve these priorities, we need to focus on building trust and loyalty with our customers and to work on transforming some key elements of the bank to build a sustainable future for the bank.
If we now turn to slide eight. Since my appointment, I've been focused on putting our purpose into action for our customers, and clear examples of this are major changes to our mortgage interest rates announced last week and our recent three-year partnership with Ó Cualann Housing.
The positive customer focus changes to our mortgage interest rates goes a long way to addressing the discrepancy which traditionally exists between our pricing for new and existing mortgage customers.
We will continue to evolve our mortgage pricing strategy in this direction as we move forward, and that's in line with our ambition to build trust with customers and to reposition the bank as a customer and community-focused bank. We are also supporting valuable societal projects in communities, such as our recent partnership with Ó Cualann Affordable Housing.
The Ó Cualann Cohousing Alliance is an approved housing body who develop fully integrated, cooperative, and affordable schemes in communities across the country. As part of our partnership, the bank will donate EUR 350,000 in funding, which Ó Cualann will use to fund the resources required to accelerate their development plans, including more than 1,800 affordable family homes across the country.
As I previously mentioned, COVID-19 has accelerated the move towards digital channels for both our customers and our colleagues, evolving the way we work, and the way we bank. Personal service will remain at the heart of everything we do. However, as both customer and colleague experiences have changed so profoundly, digital is playing an ever-increasing role in our service offering and our future ways of working.
In the first half of 2020, we had 47 million successful logins online, with customers accessing their accounts via desktop or using their mobile device. This is an increase of 30% year-over-year. The bank has now more than 650,000 active online customers. This is an increase of 8% year-over-year.
Most importantly, 94% of term lending applications have now been completed online. As previously referenced, despite Irish sentiment being at its lowest level since recessionary times, the bank has made significant gains in relationship NPS, with an increase to a score of 14 at the end of June. This compares to a score of +3 at the end of 2019. The main drivers here have been around customer care and how relevant the bank is for what the customer needs.
Our purpose is centered on building trust with customers, and we've worked hard in this regard and are pleased to see our trust score move from 50 at the end of 2019 to 55 at the end of June 2020. This is an increase of 10% in the first half of this year, placing the bank joint first in the market.
Trust here refers to the proportion of main bank customers who would endorse the bank as being trustworthy. The source of this comes from the RED C research poll, which was commissioned by the bank in June of this year. Customer focus is a key priority of the bank, and our aim is to enhance customer journeys, both on and offline.
These will be leveraged by digital capabilities to improve our service offering and to reposition our brand to ensure customers are enabled to bank at any time and place of their choosing with a product and service that they need.
We expect success in the medium term with further significance in customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty by being the clear number 3 mortgage provider in Ireland, being the best bank for small businesses in Ireland, having a simple, digitally enabled customer journey, providing products and services and processes that are easy to use and simple to access, a repositioned brand where we are known for meeting changing customer needs as their expectations evolve, and in essence, being a customer-focused bank.
We're making good progress in building a valuable franchise while respecting that we, like others, have a way to go before we build the trust and respect needed for a fully functioning banking market. If we turn now to slide nine. We are making good progress on our multi-year digital transformation program, building digital capability for our customers that will enable them to bank at a time and place of their choosing.
Together with enhancing our IT infrastructure, we are simplifying our processes all the time as a means to driving out sustainable cost efficiencies, for example, with the introduction of robotic process automation. Later this year, we will be bringing to market an end-to-end current account. This is a new digital onboarding journey that will allow customers to open a current account from the safety of their home in approximately six minutes.
In addition to enhancing personal customer journeys online, the bank is also building digital services for our business customers. This is a priority focus for us for the remainder of 2020 and beyond. We now can confirm mortgage applications within 72 hours, and we will extend approval in principle to 12 months in the near term.
We will be following our end-to-end current account delivery with the introduction of a digital mortgage journey and the rollout of mobile payment capability later this year as well. The SME market is the key focus of the bank, and I'm pleased to announce that we will be working with the SBCI and participating in the government-backed Future Growth Loan Scheme. This will be live for customer applications from October onwards, and we obviously welcome those applications.
The bank has been on a journey to improve its culture for the last number of years. This has included a bank-wide organizational cultural program. Positive indicators of cultural change are evident, with 98% of our colleagues believing that the bank continued to support the well-being of our customers through COVID.
In addition, the employee Net Promoter Score of +13 was very positive in the first half of 2020. We are also actively involved in improving the culture across the banking industry as an active member of the Irish Banking Culture Board. We are absolutely focused on rebuilding trust and improving our culture for the better of our customers and all of our stakeholders.
Our ambition in the medium term is to deliver a strengthened culture that is diverse, inclusive and risk aware, a positive impact in the communities in which we operate, a streamlined organization with effective organizational design, delivering capability and efficiency with a clear reduction in both product and process complexity.
We want to grow quality earnings across diversified income streams, with the three main streams being mortgages, consumer finance, and SME loans. Provide our customers with the choice they require through a direct banking proposition which will enhance the customer's experience.
If I turn now to slide 10. As previously mentioned, the environment in which the bank operates has changed materially and is more challenging. However, the strength built up in the bank's excuse me, balance sheet and business model has ensured that we are able to support our customers and the Irish economy.
Our ambition in the medium term is to grow our business through diversified income streams, reporting net loans, book growth, and increasing non-interest income from a loyal customer base. Balance sheet management with lower cost of funding, acquisition, servicing, together with new propositions for small businesses, targeting underserved customer segments will be a key focus for us going forward.
We will also provide our customers with competitive commercial pricing that is within the bank's risk appetite and will ensure asset quality is of a good standard. We will drive efficiencies, transforming the bank's cost base and reporting absolute cost reduction year on year. Efficiency will be a critical success factor. Our goal is for improved returns with a robust capital position. I'll now bring you through the financial summary. If we just turn to slide 12.
The key message I want to convey today is, despite a good business and financial performance in quarter one, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on quarter two performance had a material impact on the bank's profitability. We are reporting an underlying profit before impairments and exceptional items of EUR 23 million.
The top line income is reduced by 6%. We'll look at net interest income in more detail on the next slide. Fee and commission income of EUR 16 million represents 9% of total income. That is 6%, or EUR 1 million below the prior year.
This is due to reduced transactional banking activity as a direct result of the impact of COVID-19 in the economy, together with the additional rewards the bank has paid to customers during quarter two. This was supporting them through what has been a difficult time for everyone.
Net other income is showing a loss of EUR 2 million. This is driven by a prudent revaluation of the stock of properties and possession that we have available for sale. It compares income of EUR 12 million in the prior year.
This was actually due to primarily gains on the disposal of properties in possession, which we effected during 2019. Operating expenses have reduced by 2%, or EUR 3 million, as efficiency savings offset investment and inflation pressures.
This reduction in cost is evidence that the bank is maintaining a steady cost discipline. The most significant impact of COVID-19 is seen in the net impairment charge. Our H1 charge of EUR 75 million reflects a significant deterioration in the economic outlook during the second quarter.
Under IFRS 9, the bank is required to look forward and estimate future expected credit losses based on a range of potential outcomes using multiple economic scenarios. As a result, the overall balance sheet impairment provision has increased as we build additional balance sheet resilience. Given the economic outlook, the bank assumes a prudent approach to provisioning.
The full-year loan loss experience will be directly linked to the emerging macroeconomic indicators and the impact of payment breaks issued in 2020. Exceptional items of EUR 5 million for the first half primarily relate to costs incurred in the bank's immediate response to COVID-19 and ensuring the continuity of service in a safe and secure way as the country embraced the government-imposed lockdown. We'll turn now to the net interest income and net interest margin slide, which is slide 13.
Net interest income reduced by 6% or EUR 10 million, and this was due to lower income on the maturity of higher yielding treasury assets, which had an impact of EUR 11 million, and lower income from NPLs, and this had an impact of EUR 5 million. These were offset by increased performing loan income and lower funding costs.
Net lending income, which is performing loan book income less deposit costs, grew by 5% to EUR 177 million in the first half of the year. The net interest margin was 175 basis points, which is five basis points lower than that reported in 2019. The total asset yield was 1.95%. This is a 10 basis point reduction when compared to the same period of 2019.
This reduction in asset yield was due to the continued maturity of high yielding legacy treasury assets, the cost of excess liquidity, also with price reductions to the bank's fixed rate mortgage product offer. We continue to actively manage the cost of funds with the first half cost of at 22 basis points, this is a five basis point lower cost when compared to the same period in 2019.
This reduction was achieved primarily through continued active management of deposit costs which offset the impact of an MTPN issuance in the second half of 2019. Overall, we expect the NIM trajectory to be in the low 170 basis points area for 2020. If we now turn to the loan book slide on slide 14. Total new lending reduced by 16% year-on-year.
Mortgage lending, which represents almost 89% of total new lending, reduced by 14% when compared to the same period of 2019. The mortgage market itself reduced by 16%. We are pleased to report that the market share of new mortgage drawdowns increased from 14.7% for the first six months of 2019 to 15.2% for the first six months of 2020.
While our share of application has been slightly lower through the early parts of this year, it has improved to 14.4% for the month of June. As mentioned previously, we've taken action by introducing a reduced new mortgage pricing for new and existing customers.
Just to remind ourselves of that, over 70,000 customers will benefit from the reductions to the standard variable rate, which is reduced by 0.55%, and the managed variable rates, which are reducing by up to 30 basis points, and they're both from early September. We've also had a reduction in fixed rates for all existing customers, and we're aligning the front and back book rates.
We've also have a reduction in the three and five-year fixed rate for new customers for mortgages over 250,000, and these rates now are as low as 2.5%. The mortgage market is expected to reduce to around EUR 7 billion in 2020, and that presents a challenging backdrop for our business, and it's very important for us to remain competitive for our customers.
We believe that efficient distribution and disciplined pricing, coupled a strong intermediary position, the three of those together positions us well for the future, and we can continue to be a competitive force in the mortgage market. Personal term lending was EUR 46 million, and this is a 35% reduction year-on-year, with April and May 2020 seeing little demand for consumer loans.
The majority of our personal loan applications now originate through direct channels, and we've fully automated the personal term lending journey such as that real-time decisions, document upload, and payout can all be fulfilled digitally, thereby eliminating the need for manual intervention.
SME lending was EUR 25 million for the first six months, and going forward, we are confident we can build a real market presence in the business segments we choose. If we now turn to slide 15.
Our total home loan performing book was EUR 11.6 billion at the end of June, and this was a slight decrease versus the end of 2019. This movement is reflective of the quarter two COVID impact and the continued competition within the mortgage market. The performing mortgage book has an average yield of 2.59%, and that's more or less flat year-on-year.
You can see from the top right-hand side of the slide that the first half 2020 average yield on new mortgage loans was 2.86%, and this is a reduction of five basis points versus 2019. This reduction is in line with the market trends and is in line with our aim to remain competitive while maintaining price discipline.
The bank wrote over half a billion of new mortgage business in the first half of the year, and 90% of this was on fixed rates with an average yield of 2.88%. The home loan book naturally repays at around 5% per annum, and the H1 2020 outflows, and this is both repayments and redemptions, was EUR 600 million, and 42% of this was from tracker mortgages, and they had an average yield of 1.29%.
Tracker mortgages now account for 44% of the home loan performing book, and this is down from 54% at the end of 2017. Fixed rate mortgages account for 34% of the home loan performing book, and this is an increase of 25 percentage points in the last three years. Variable rate mortgages, which consist of both standard and managed variable rate products, make up the balance of 23% of the performing home loan book.
This has decreased by 14 percentage points over the last three years. Only 3% of the performing home loan mortgage book is on an interest-only product. We now turn to slide 16. In terms of our buy-to-let mortgage book, this has reduced by 4% from EUR 3.3 billion as at the end of December 2019 to EUR 3.1 billion at the end of June.
The buy-to-let mortgage book is primarily a legacy tracker mortgage book made up of 90% tracker, 9% variable, and 1% fixed rate. You'll see from the top right-hand corner of the slide that the average yield on this buy-to-let portfolio is 1.42%, and it was flat versus the same period of June 2019. 84% of the tracker buy-to-let book has an average yield of just 109 basis points.
As previously outlined, the majority of the bank's interest-only mortgages are within the buy-to-let book, and as at June 2020, 60% of the buy-to-let book are on interest only. Let's turn to operating expenses. Total operating expenses have reduced by 2% year-on-year.
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization, and regulatory charges, we refer to these as our addressable costs, were EUR 123 million in the first half of 2020, that's a decrease of EUR 5 million or 4% year-on-year.
The primary movers of operating costs were wage inflation of EUR 1 million, investment in business and technology programs of EUR 1 million, these were offset by lower costs paid to contractors, together with other savings initiatives, including lower legal and professional fees.
Staff costs were EUR 77 million, and they remained unchanged year-on-year and with a 2% increase in staff and wage inflation being offset by lower numbers of daily rate contractors and associated costs. Non-staff costs reduced by EUR 6 million or 10% year-on-year, with ongoing savings initiatives across discretionary costs allowing for reinvestment spend.
The three-year investment program technology, which known internally as Project Forte, together with some other investment initiatives remain on track with continued cost reduction efficiency gains being realized.
As a result of this, you will see the underlying depreciation and amortization cost has increased by 12%, and you can expect this line to continue to increase in the medium term as progress is made in completing our investment programs.
We will continue our rigorous focus on cost management, we expect underlying addressable costs to continue to reduce over the medium term as the cost of investment is funded from sustainable operational efficiencies within the bank's cost base. On a like-for-like basis, the underlying cost income ratio, this is when you exclude regulatory costs, was 78%, which is 9 percentage points higher than the previous year, this is actually due to lower total income.
We now turn to slide 18. For March 2020, the bank has approved around 10,500 mortgage payment breaks. The average mortgage size of the payment break was EUR 152,000. The average loan-to-value on the payment break population is around 70%. The average yields on the payment breaks is 2.8%, around 50% of payment breaks are tracker mortgages.
As at the end of July 2020, the bank has 9,400 expired payment breaks, 40% or 3,700 have moved on to payment break 2, 14% or 1,300 are in discussion with the bank with regard to the option they will pursue with regard to moving forward. 46% or 4,300 did not require a payment break and have now returned to their normal repayment terms.
The bank has 4,000 active mortgage payment breaks as at the end of July, the average yield on these is slightly lower, they're at 2.7%. Turning now to slide 19 on NPLs. Non-performing loans at the end of June were EUR 1.1 billion, this is broadly in line with the 2019 year-end balance.
When compared to the prior year, we see that the balance has reduced by 35% from EUR 1.7 billion to EUR 1.1 billion, bringing the NPL ratio from 10% to 6.8% over the last 12 months. This reduction was primarily as a result of the second half 2019 transaction called GLAS II, where we sold EUR 500 million of non-performing loans, with that transaction being capital accretive.
Organic and technical cures during the period were around EUR 100 million. Looking forward, we are committed to meeting the mid-single-digit NPL ratio. Through this, we estimate that 44% of current NPLs are on a path to cure through organic and technical cure means, and we expect that to happen over the next 12-18 months.
For the remaining 66% of NPLs, we will consider all options in connection with reducing this balance. Our main aim as we reduce our NPL position is to protect capital. As you'll see from the table on the bottom left-hand side of the slide, our asset quality and level of provision cover remains at an appropriate level, with an Expected Credit Loss of EUR 350 million on EUR 1.1 billion of that non-performing assets.
From that, we have an overall 31.9% coverage ratio, which we believe is appropriate. The guidance from the regulator under the stress process and coverage levels on secured NPLs over seven years still remains unchanged. For the end of 2020, the requirement is to have 40% coverage on these NPLs over seven years. That coverage ratio increases to 100% on a linear basis to 2026. We move now to slide 20. To cover our funding position.
Our funding positions have remained strong in spite of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our strategy is to continue to fund our balance sheet by customer deposits while keeping other funding lines open and accessible. That's exactly where we are today.
As you can see from the table on the top right-hand side of the slide, at the end of June, the bank's liquidity and funding ratios have continued to move positively since the year-end. We are now 95% funded by customer deposits, with retail balances remaining stable year-on-year.
The Central Bank has revised the bank's current MREL requirement in order to reflect a reduction in the countercyclical buffer, which reduced from 1% to 0%, and has extended the transitional period to comply with the requirement by six months to June 2021.
We expect confirmation of a revised target, with a new MREL decision, in the first half of 2021, and that's using the bank's Resolution and Recovery Directive II framework. I should also note here that the bank's excess liquidity held with the central bank as of the 30th June was around EUR 300 million, and it was attracting a negative 50 basis points cost.
At the end of July, that has now reduced to around EUR 200 million, and we will actively manage our liquidity as we move forward. If we just move now forward to slide 21 and cover capital.
Our regulatory capital ratios remain comfortably above the regulatory minimum requirements. The CET1 ratio on a fully loaded basis has decreased by 1.1%- 13.9%, at the end of June 2020, and this compares to a pro forma level of 15% at the end of December 2019.
On a transitional basis, we also decreased our core CET1 ratio by 1.6%- 60.5% when compared to the pro forma level of 18.1 at the end of December 2019. The reduction in capital ratios is primarily a result of the net impairment charge of EUR 75 million in the P&L, together with a prudent approach to reflecting higher risk weights on the payment break population.
Risk weights have increased from EUR 9.7 billion as of the end of last year to EUR 10 billion at the end of June, capturing the risk which has not yet materialized with regard to the payment break population.
As mentioned in an earlier slide, the Central Bank, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, have introduced measures to support the sustainable provision of credit in the economy and specifically the removal of the countercyclical buffer of 1%, but also the early introduction of the CRD V regulatory amendment, which lowers the CET1, on a transitional basis, by 1.51%.
The CET1 minimum SREP requirement is now set at 8.94% and having reduced from 11.45% since the end of 2019. The total capital ratio requirement was reduced to 13.95%, and that's from a level of 14.95%, and both of these on a transitional basis. Our management target, for fully loaded core CET1 still remains at a 13% level.
The bank maintains a robust leverage ratio with the Tier 1 capital fully loaded ratio at over 7% and the Tier 1 transitional level at over 8%. It's just quite safe, at those levels. The outlook, let's talk about 2020. The first half of 2020 has been challenging, not only for the bank, but also for the Irish economy and for society as a whole.
The outlook remains uncertain. Recovery is dictated by the containment of the COVID-19 virus and the government-led phases of reopening the economy. As previously indicated, lower business activity in quarter two has impacted gross lending volumes. However, July has shown more positive signs of recovery, and therefore we anticipate the 2020 new lending volume could be 40% lower than the volume in 2019, and that was at EUR 1.7 billion.
Interest income will be lower, as the remaining higher yielding treasury assets mature. Our net interest margin is expected to decline to the low 170 basis points level. This reflects the low interest rate environment and slight growth in liquid assets. We will continue to review non-interest income. It currently represents 9% of total income.
We will look to grow this in terms of it being 10%, greater than 10% of total income in the medium term. Achieving cost reductions in the current economic environment will prove challenging. However, the bank retains its outlook that operating costs will remain stable for 2020. We're committed to delivering cost savings in the medium term.
To be noted that 97% of total performing assets are secured by residential mortgages, and as such, the full year loan loss experience will be directly linked to the emerging macroeconomic indicators, the impact of the payment breaks issued in 2020, and house price inflation.
The reopening of the economy, recent declines in unemployment data and the resilience of the housing market and a government stimulus program now in place shows more encouraging indicators than would've been previously anticipated.
The bank will keep the Expected Credit Loss under constant review throughout the second half of the year. Our capital remains strong, having access to a range of scenarios. Having access to a range of scenarios, the CET1 ratio will remain well above the bank's minimum regulatory requirements. Just turning to slide 23, which is the final slide.
In summary, we continue to maintain strong funding and liquidity positions, and our capital ratios are well above the regulatory minimum requirements. We remain competitive in the mortgage market with our ambition to be the clear number 3 in the market, together with targeted growth in both SME and consumer lending.
We are implementing a bank-wide initiative to reduce complexity and improve efficiency. As a result, we are making cost savings to pay for our digital transformation program, and we are focused on reducing costs over the medium term.
Lastly, we believe we're well-positioned for the challenges that have faced us in 2020 and will continue to face us through the remainder of the year. We will take opportunities as they come on which to grow our balance sheet and our profitability. Thank you very much for your time, and I'll be happy to take questions now over the phone. Thank you very much.
Thank you. As a reminder that if you would like to ask a question via the audio line, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Please ensure your line is unmuted locally, and you will be advised when to ask your question. That was star one on your telephone keypad. We do have a question coming through from the line of Eamonn Hughes calling from Goodbody. Please go ahead.
Hi, Eamonn. How are you? Eamonn Hughes, Goodbody Stockbrokers. Eamonn, can I just pick you up maybe a little bit around the revenue guidance in terms of new lending. If you think about the, it's kind of less worse in one sense, you had guided at the time of the IMS down new lending 40%-50%.
You're now saying 40%, so at the better end of that. You were down 16% in H1, and I suppose just that would imply down roughly 60%-65% in H2. I'm conscious as well, your commentary around the market being a little bit better in July and even the kind of the market guidance that you gave there, which might be an amalgam of a few figures, but it's kind of guiding down 25%-30%. Just kind of your thoughts around the momentum.
It feels like it might be even a little bit better than you're guiding in relation to that -40. That's just the first thing. Just, I suppose just to be clear on my own end in relation to the NIM guidance. You just did 175. I know kind of there's an uptick in terms of deposit number, but I think the number, if memory serves you right, was 180 at the half year.
It would feel like you're assuming kind of only a marginal decline in terms of H2 NIM. Maybe just to be clear on that, and then maybe finally, if I'm allowed, kind of one last point, just in relation to the cost side, slightly up. I'm kind of splitting hairs here, a couple of EUR million year-over-year. You're guiding kind of flat for the full year.
Would it be hopeful that there's maybe a little bit more progress around some of the costs? Maybe there was some costs in H1 around opening the branches and creating all the social distancing measures that some of that clearly probably drops out in H2. That might help terms of the cost momentum, maybe a little bit in H2. Okay.
Thanks, Eamonn. Thanks for those questions. What we've seen, particularly since early June, that applications have recovered. They're not to the level that we would have expected, but they are close. They're 80%-90% what we would expect. We are seeing momentum in the housing market.
I think also, while it's too early to say we would sense some momentum outside the urban locations, particularly as people get used to working from home and see the ability of maybe a different work style in that regard.
Obviously with our branches spread across the country, we are very well positioned to take advantage of that more regional spread of potential mortgage growth. The key message here is that we've seen momentum as the lockdown requirements have released.
We obviously have to be very careful in case there's further lockdown measures as the pandemic maybe rears its ugly head again. We are relatively positive, and I would say that maybe it may not be as bad as 40% lower. We could beat that. We are being slightly conservative in that regard. Around the 170 basis points.
Naturally, we have cut some back book pricing on our SVR and our MVR. That equates to around one to two basis points annualized. Those savings will arrive for customers from early September, we'll have four months of those savings in our impact in our NIM guidance this year. We also have some excess liquidity, as I mentioned. We have reduced it to around EUR 200 million. We have to be conscious that people are saving.
My own desire is to beat that NIM number, so we will be doing our best to try and do it. Also, the MREL will help us by way of, next year now, we expect that the level of MREL that we require will be lower than we would have indicated in the past, but we've yet to see that. The NIM number is all to play for, and we're working hard to maintain it.
By way of cost, the geography in our presentation there has COVID costs in exceptional items. If you look at our financials, and we presented that to show the underlying cost reduction, we've something in the region of EUR 4 million associated with the COVID costs in the first half. Our transaction costs are reasonably positive. While our headcount has increased, our level of daily rate contractors have decreased significantly.
We're really working closely with regard to how we manage those resources. How we manage project resources and how we're making sure that we get the proper return from the spend we're making. In previous years, I would've talked about saving EUR 20 million last year in costs and the previous year that we reinvested into the business.
As we progress our digital programs, our level of reinvestment will reduce because we're making progress there. I mentioned the online current account will go live in the autumn, which will allow customers open an account within six minutes. 94% of term loan volume is now going direct. We will have a direct overdraft offering in the autumn as well. We've a significant number of our deposit customers who are also transacting online.
That in itself is bringing its own cost savings, and we will be looking to reap those savings over the coming years. I would be hopeful, based on our experience, that we can demonstrate a continued debt reduction there.
Okay. Thanks, Eamonn. I just want to follow up. I know, look, the world has kind of changed in the last four months or five months or whatever, but there was some kind of initial targets that were set out there back in early March, late February, and the loan book is clearly shrinking, and that's going to change the whole kind of revenue cost trade-off dynamic and all that.
Any sort of sense in terms, and you're only in the job a few weeks as well, but could we be thinking, maybe when we see again in February in terms of FY 2020s that you'll have thought or worked through in terms of all the number crunch and as well we'll know exactly where we've hopefully ended up in terms of COVID-19 if things flow through, that we'll have a better sense in terms of medium term targets from yourselves or, I presume it's still work in progress?
Eamonn. I would intend to provide that clarity at the next set of results. Naturally, the COVID-19 impact is still uncertain. If there's ripple effects coming from that either globally or in Ireland, we have to be conscious of that. It would be my intention at the next set of results to provide that direction over the coming years. That's something we'll be looking quite closely on through the autumn as we lay out our plans for the next three years. The answer is yes.
Okay. Thank you.
Thanks, Eamonn. Thank you.
The next question comes in from the line of Ibrahim Sayed calling from DB. Please go ahead.
Hi there. Good morning. I just had a couple of questions. First, on your capital, does the capital position reflect sort of the regulatory relief measures provided in Q1, Q2, including for software intangibles and so forth? Secondly, should I go through all my questions or should we go one by one?
Well, maybe it's easier for me to answer one by one.
Yeah. Okay.
It reflects about a 25 basis points positive impact with regard to those measures.
25 bps?
Yes.
Okay. that's already included in the EUR 13.9-
Yes
fully loaded. Okay.
That's right. Yeah.
All right. Fine. On the 40 basis point increase in your NPL ratio, could you explain that? Is that due to recent impairments or I didn't quite understand the standard execution reference that was made?
Yes. It is a net increase by about EUR 50 million, by way of our NPL level. We're now at EUR 1.1 billion. We were EUR 50 million lower than that at the end of last year. We've had some organic cures in that population, which is around EUR 100 million. We've had some default flow through the first half of the year. That makes up the difference there.
Okay.
The key thing here is, we believe around 44% of that EUR 1.1 billion will cure either by way of organic cure or technical cure over the coming 12- 18 months. Indeed, we were hoping to be slightly further ahead on technical cures in the first half of the year.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our resources in this area were looking elsewhere naturally, with regard to payment breaks and ensuring we looked after customers. That's something we'll get back at in the second half of the year. I would expect to see a reduction as we move into the second half of the year, as we move through those organic and technical cures. That's the answer there.
Okay. Obviously, you had some very successful NPL disposal transactions over the last few years. Are there any in the pipe in sort of the latter part of this year? Do you find that sort of revenue pressures might push that further out in terms of your ambition to get to low mid-digit?
The answer is there's nothing in the pipeline at all. I think it's fair to say that of any Irish bank, we've made significant progress in this area over recent years. When we look at this crisis, if we had not have made that progress, I think our discussion today would be slightly different. That has been quite a positive outturn for us. We are relatively confident with regard to how we think about NPLs.
We've the lowest nominal level of NPLs in the Irish market at EUR 1.1 billion. I've already communicated that a significant portion we believe will cure. The remaining portion can be dealt with through in a professional and proper manner.
The market itself, I'd suggest, is slightly closed at the moment, given the uncertainty with COVID and the uncertainty with property prices. We are not active in this area. We naturally keep all options open. As I mentioned, I believe we're in a relatively good position at this moment.
Okay. Thank you. Just the final one. On the MREL, I appreciate you raising guidance on your updated requirements. If I recall correctly, it was EUR 1 billion previously, and you'd issued, I think, around EUR 300 million or EUR 400 million last year.
Yeah.
Is there any intention to issue a further Volcker instrument this year, or do you think it gets pushed to next year or further out?
Our MREL requirement was EUR 1 billion then. We actually reported it had reduced to EUR 800 million, and indeed, of which EUR 300 million was issued last year. We expect it to reduce even further as we get the new guidance next year. We await that guidance, but it could be that we're required to issue about another EUR 300 million of MREL.
That is yet to be confirmed, but it just shows you that our demand is not enormous in that area. Naturally, that does assist our P&L as we move forward. With regard to other instruments, we actively manage our capital.
We do have an AT1 instrument in the market which is due to call, or we have an option to call, I should say, in April of next year, and that's something we will consider in due course, but it's not something that for today. We consider all the instruments that we can put into the market. We will suggest you wait for the next results, and we'll update you then.
Okay, fine. On the AT1 specifically, because it is issued out of the OpCo and it is not fully included, is there any possibility, like one of your peers to potentially buy back partially instrument, or is that something you have sort of discussed with the regulator?
No, we're not at that stage yet. It's slightly early in our discussions. The clue is probably in the earlier part of your question, which is the current structure of that AT1 is not at a level that is efficient, and that's something we have to consider as we look at the wider market conditions and where we are from a capital perspective. These are things we will deal with through the autumn, and we'll be back to talk to the market early next year about how we will progress them.
Okay. Thank you so much for taking all my questions.
Thanks. Thank you.
The next question comes in from the line of Diarmaid Sheridan calling from Davy. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Thank you, Eamonn, for the presentation. A couple questions, if I may. Firstly, around the impairment line and maybe your expectations for the rest of the year. I assume given the significant charge in the first half, we should assume that it should be lower, given that you've now put the significant changes in the macroeconomic assumptions into your model.
The second question then around Risk-Weighted Assets and how we should think about those stage 2 loans, particularly those where the payment break, where they've migrated. As they move back onto repayment, should they move back to stage 1? Is there a time frame that they would move back, and what type of impact might that have on your Risk-Weighted Assets in the second half of the year, perhaps?
Maybe finally, just a comment around the SME market, and maybe just tease out a little bit your ambition for that market going forward, particularly now that as you've announced your acceptance into the guarantee scheme at the SBCI, which is obviously very helpful. Thank you.
Thank you very much. The EUR 75 million charge is based on our models, based on IFRS 9 models, which reflect the updated macroeconomic environment. As those models work, if the macroeconomic environment does not deteriorate, we would expect that the lion's share of provisioning has been reflected at this moment.
Naturally, we have to be cognizant of two key things in that. With 97% of our balance sheet secured by property, we obviously have to be aware of where property prices are going. In our models, we're showing a 9% reduction in house price inflation. That's something we have to keep an eye on closely. The second thing relates to the payment break. This is how the actual payment breaks will end with regard to payment break 2.
If they actually remain performing and indeed their situation associated with the request for a payment break will be clear in that regard, they would move into stage 1. We would have to consider the level of provision that would be required for customers who are in default NPL classified coming out of the payment break population.
I just go back to a point I made in the presentation, which is the average LTV on this customer base is 70%. It is quite a healthy LTV on average with regard to how those payment breaks will end up.
We will be working closely with customers to try and reach solutions that make sense for them, and being very conscious of vulnerable customers within that group. With regard to RWAs, we've taken a very prudent approach here to RWAs, in that we are reflecting in the region of EUR 500 million of additional RWAs on the stack.
That equates to about EUR 65 million in provision, if you think of it from a capital perspective. This relates to while the EUR 75 million covers Expected Loss, we believe the RWA increase covers unexpected loss.
I'm giving you to the level of provision amount there as an equation to equate that. As those customers remain performing by way of the payment population, you would see that RWA level reduce, and indeed our capital position to improve on that basis. As I say, this is really safe. It's very conservative.
It's belt and braces by way of our approach from a capital perspective. As I believe, we'll wait and see how the payment breaks work out, but we believe we've reflected the downside scenario in our capital numbers at this moment. With regard to SME, through our 76 branches, we actually have quite strong relationships with customers who come to us for mortgage and personal business, but they actually do their business banking elsewhere.
We believe there's a significant opportunity within the market to have a competitor that's credible, that's in the locality, that's in the community, and can provide competition to the other players in this area. Our ambitions here, really, we've undertaken EUR 25 million in the first six months. We have a relatively strong pipeline as we move into the second six months. This excludes the SBCI engagement.
This is an area that we'd like to build over the coming years. We would like to get in excess of 5% of new business, new SME origination going forward. That's something that we want to build for the next number of years. It's something I will give more guidance on and clarity on at the next set of results as regards our approach.
We're building a team. We believe we can be competitive, and we believe we can be relevant to customers and provide them with another option by way of a bank that they can go to in their local community to do business with. I hope that answers your three questions, Diarmaid.
That's great. Thanks, Eamonn.
The next question comes in from the line of Jakub Gliszczynski calling from RBC. Please go ahead.
Hi there. Thanks for holding the call. One question I had is around coverage, page three 32%. You're saying it remains appropriate. Just to clarify for me, does that already reflect the 40% guidance from end 2020, and it's just a result of some younger vintages in there, and that's why they're not provisioned as high at 40%?
Given that you've made a comment that NPL market is a bit closed, I know it can be temporary, but I'm thinking whether you will have to be booking the provisions as per the schedule if you cannot actually work out well, sell them externally.
Thank you, Jakub, for your question. Obviously, the 31.9% coverage is across whole book. Not all of the book is over seven years. The coverage on the exposures that are over seven years is at a much higher level and much closer to 40%. We believe the distance to get to 40% is not a challenge for us with regard to 2020.
Naturally, as you move into the future years by way of the straight line coverage on those NPLs, it becomes less attractive from a capital perspective. For 2020, we're in good shape. As I mentioned, and as we've evidenced in recent years, we've been very efficient around NPL deleveraging, and we've a proficiency in the bank to manage that. As and when that bank market comes back, we will look at all options with regard to our NPLs.
I believe we're quite well provisioned and covered in that regard. It's also worth noting that a significant portion of our NPLs are not past days due, so they tend to have a technical stamp by way of NPL exposure rather than being deep in arrears, and you can see that in our financial statements by way of the breakdown.
Just the last point here is that in our NPL deleveraging that we've done, you will see that in those transactions, we have sold at net book value or slightly above. Again, that gives us additional confidence that we are well provisioned and well covered with regard to those assets. I hope that answers your question, Jakub.
Yes. Thank you.
Thank you.
The next question comes in from the line of Guy Stebbings calling from Exane BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.
Morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Just had a couple around risk. Firstly, coming back to Risk-Weighted Assets and the treatment for payment holidays. Just trying to understand what assumptions are being baked in here. Is it kind of a certain proportion moved to permanent arrears?
Also, how much of this is yourselves being particularly prudent in your treatment here, and how much was this sort of encouraged by the regulator? The second question was just on coverage of stage 2, which fell over the half year.
Which on the face of it looks odd. I'm sure I probably just missed it in disclosure somewhere, but can I just check, is that just mix working through and perhaps more home loans entering stage 2 and lower LTVs? Does that sort of explain the move in the first half? Thanks.
Okay. Just to take your second question first. We have moved about EUR 700 million of exposure relating to payment breaks into stage 2. Again, a conservative approach, and that highlights to you why it appears that the coverage level has reduced. It is purely just related to that point.
With regard to what we have done on our RWA, it is a prudent approach, and we are adopting a very prudent approach with regard to capital. We believe our capital is quite strong, and we want to highlight to the market that covering more severe eventualities, we still have a strong capital position as an organization. That has obviously been supported by the capital we have generated through de-leveraging over recent years, together with underlying profitability.
By way of the what does it represent by way of how much by way of default, I don't have that number to give you, but I did mention that it does equate to about EUR 65 million of provisioning. If you look at the customers that are left on payment break 2, it's about 50% or between EUR 700 million and EUR 800 million of exposure that has moved onto payment break 2. I also mentioned that there's about a 70% LTV on that book.
I would suggest you taking those various price points and various piece of information into view that we are conservatively provisioned from a capital perspective, and we take account of not only the expected loss, but also the unexpected loss that could occur on this book, and we wait and see how that plays out. They're very simple.
Okay. Thank you. Very helpful.
Thank you.
There currently are no further questions coming through. As a final reminder, that if you would like to ask a question on today's call, please press star one on your telephone keypad now. Okay, we do have some additional questions coming through. The next question comes in from the line of Jakub Gliszczynski calling from RBC. Please go ahead.
Hi there. Apologies. Just to follow up. The guidance on NIM, does that actually incorporate the potential issuance of MREL debt or no?
It doesn't because it refers to 2020, and we have achieved an extension of the MREL debt issuance out to June 2021. While we are looking at the market to see the opportunity of market conditions, I would see that MREL issuance as being more in the earlier part of next year rather than the later part of this year.
Well, very clear. Thank you again.
Thank you.
The next caller in queue is Eamonn Hughes calling from Goodbody. Eamonn, please go ahead.
Sorry, Eamonn. Just to be back again, one more. Just to be clear in my own mind, is the RWA pickup is in relation to payment breaks. As with the impact on capital, is that reflective of the figure at the end of June or is it at the reduced figure at the end of July? Just to be clear.
It's June, Eamonn.
It's June. All other things being equal, you should already be starting to see some relief from that as customers move back to payments.
Yeah.
Yeah. Okay. Thank you.
Okay, the final question comes in from the line of Stephen Lyons calling from Davy. Please go ahead.
Morning, Eamonn. Just a couple of questions from me, if I can. First, just a point of clarification. I think you were quizzed on the regulatory relief from the changes in tangible software treatments. I think you mentioned 25 basis points. Is that the benefit that is to come? Separately, just on margin, there's quite a step down in the running yield on the treasury book during the period. Just trying to get a sense of what that might trend into next year and what might that represent by way of kind of an additional drag on the NIM. Thank you.
On your first question, the 25 basis points benefit is reflected in the 13.9 level of fully loaded CET1. It is reflected, so it's there. With regard to treasury yields, we've seen a significant reduction in income from treasury assets due to the maturity profile. I don't expect that reduction.
We'll see some further reductions in income in the second half, naturally as the year moves on. Next year we would see that flattening it out and not having such a material impact on our net interest margin moving forward. I don't have the number for you, Stephen, at this moment, but I can come back to you separately on that question.
Okay. Maybe just one final question. Just on the CET1, we've seen a lowering of buffers during H1, and we've seen the P2R composition change, and yet you still have the CET1 target of 13% plus. Is it feasible that as we move into next year and market conditions are favorable and you optimize your capital structure further, particularly I'm thinking about the AT1, that that 12% could move lower?
I wouldn't see it at this moment. All banks across Europe now have the dividend restriction by way of how we think about that capital structure. There's still naturally uncertainty with regard to how the market is going to, and how the wider economy is going to operate over the next six to 18 and 24 months.
We can just see the impacts on aviation and other aspects of what was normal business life. We just have to wait and see. I wouldn't be suggesting that we would be reducing at this moment until we get a better view of how things are going to play out across the board.
Okay. Thanks very much.
Thanks for that. Thank you.
Thank you. That does conclude today's question and answer session. I shall turn the call back across to yourselves for any closing remarks.
I'd just like to thank everyone for the wide range of questions and interest, and for listening to us this morning. Thank you very much.
Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect your handset.